Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
experiments (9, 13, 15). However, no novel cloned gene has been
reported to increase grain yield in indica cultivars (17). Here, we
identied a gene in a tropical japonica landrace and used the
allele to increase the grain yield of modern indica cultivars at
the crop level through a breeding concept developed by International Rice Research Institute (IRRI) breeders more than
20 y ago.
In 1989, a breeding program for New Plant Type (NPT) rice
was launched at IRRI to increase the yields of modern indica
cultivars by using genetic material from tropical japonica landraces (18). Several Indonesian tropical japonica landraces
which are characterized by large panicles, large leaves, a vigorous
root system, thick stems, and few unproductive tillershave
been used in international breeding programs. However, despite
these features, the NPT cultivars yield less than modern indica
cultivars, mainly because of low grain fertility and low panicle
number (19, 20). To genetically dissect and elicit the valuable
traits of NPT cultivars, we backcrossed the NPT cultivars including YP9 (IR68522-10-2-2) against modern indica cultivar
IR64 to develop introgression lines (ILs) (Fig. S1). BC3-derived
ILs, which had favorable yield-related traits and few undesirable
Signicance
Author contributions: D.F., Y.F., I.H.S.-L., T.I., and N.K. designed research; D.F., K.R.T., A.G.T.,
M.V.S., Y.K., K.S., N.T., R.B.G., S.Y., and T.I. performed research; T.N., T.K., and I.H.S.-L.
contributed new reagents/analytic tools; D.F., K.R.T., A.G.T., and I.H.S.-L. analyzed data;
and D.F., I.H.S.-L., T.I., and N.K. wrote the paper.
The authors declare no conict of interest.
*This Direct Submission article had a prearranged editor.
Freely available online through the PNAS open access option.
1
Present address: Indonesian Center for Agricultural Biotechnology and Genetic Resources Research and Development, Jl. Tentara Pelajar 3A, Bogor, West Java 16111,
Indonesia.
Present address: The Hakubi Center for Advanced Research/Graduate School of Agriculture, Kyoto University, Kitashirakawa, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606-8502, Japan.
AGRICULTURAL
SCIENCES
Edited* by Gurdev S. Khush, University of California, Davis, CA, and approved November 4, 2013 (received for review June 11, 2013)
Results
Characterization of NIL-SPIKE. We characterized qTSN4, designated here as SPIKE, by using an NIL for SPIKE, NIL-SPIKE
(Fig. 1A). NIL-SPIKE had larger panicles (Fig. 1B), leaves (Fig.
1C), and panicle necks than IR64 (Fig. 1D). Among yieldrelated traits, it had higher TSN (Fig. 1E), ag leaf width (FLW;
Fig. 1F), root dry weight (RDW; Fig. 1G), and rate of lled
grain (Fig. S2A), but had lower panicle number per plant and 1,000grain weight (Fig. S2 B and C). Notably, along with the rate of lled
grain, the grain appearance was improved (Fig. 1H), presumably owing to a strengthening of assimilate supply to the
larger number of spikelets by an increase in vascular bundle
number (VBN; Fig. 1I). Consequently, the grain yield per m2
(GYS) of the NIL was consistently higher than that of IR64
over four cropping seasons, signicantly so in three of the four
seasons (Fig. 1J). The average GYS of the NIL was 28%
higher in the dry season and 24% higher in the wet season
than that of IR64 (400 g/m2). Therefore, the increase in
GYS in the NIL without a decline in grain appearance was
achieved through the enlargement of sink size (high TSN),
source size (broad FLW and high RDW), and translocation capacity (high VBN). Additionally, days-to-heading was unchanged
(Fig. S2D). Thus, SPIKE is highly useful for improving yield without changing locally adapted traits.
D
IR64
***
Root dry weight (g)
1.6
150
1.2
100
0.8
50
0
0.4
IR64 NIL
12
IR64 NIL
**
10
8
6
4
2
0
IR64 NIL
14
I
Brown rice
12
10
8
6
4
**
2
0
IR64 NIL
IR64NIL
NIL-SPIKE
J
700
25
20
***
15
10
5
0
IR64 NIL
600
2.0
NIL-SPIKE
200
IR64
Chalky
Normal
NIL-SPIKE
IR64
36%
**
13%
n.s.
35%
**
20%
*
500
400
300
200
100
0
Fig. 1. Characterization of yield-related traits of a NIL for SPIKE. (A) Plant morphologies. (B) Panicle structures. (C) Flag leaves. (D) Cross-sections of panicle
neck. (Scale bars: A, 20 cm; B, 10 cm; C, 5 cm; D, 500 m.) (EJ) Comparisons between IR64 and NIL-SPIKE of spikelet number per panicle (n = 8) (E), ag leaf
width (n = 9) (F), root dry weight at maturity (n = 10) (G), rate of chalkiness in brown rice (H), number of vascular bundles in panicle neck (n = 20) (I), and grain
weight per m2 among two dry (DS) and wet seasons (WS) (J). Percentages above bars in J are yield increases of the NIL relative to IR64. Values are means, with
whiskers showing SD. (SEM in J). Signicant at ***0.1%; **1%; *5%; n.s., not signicant.
20432 | www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.1310790110
Fujita et al.
RM3423 AGT3
RM6909
220 kbp
n=7996
2 mm 6 mm 14 mm
E 2.5
Crown roots
RM3423
10
10
12
18 kbp
ATG
Root
SPIKE
Ubiquitin
RM5503
Os04g52479
SPIKE
Lateral roots
TGA
Young panicle
IR64
NIL
IR64
NIL
IR64
NIL
IR64
NIL
4L
Leaf
sheath
CEN
4S
Leaf
SPIKE
Culm
Os04g52500
Os04g52504
Lateral roots
n.s.
>21 mm
Young panicle
n.s.
n.s.
2.0
1.5
1.0
0.5
0
IR64NIL IR64NILIR64NIL IR64 NIL
NIL-SPIKE
Multi-copies
Ubi:SPIKE
amiRNA1
IR64
NIL-SPIKE
Multi-copies
Ubi:SPIKE
amiRNA1
D
c
250
200
150
100
50
161
0 IR64
G
100
177
210
Ubi:SPIKE
Single Multi
80
60
40
20
87
0 NIL
40
19
2.5
Flag leaf width (cm)
IR64
C
Spikelet number per panicle
2.0
1.5
1.0
0.5
Single Multi
H
Flag leaf width (cm)
1.6
a
b
1.2
0.8
0.4
1.5 0.9
0 NIL
1.1
Fig. 3. Transgenic analysis for SPIKE through overexpression and gene silencing. (A) Morphologies of IR64 plant and Ubi:SPIKE plant in which SPIKE is
overexpressed by the ubiquitin promoter. (B) Panicle structures of IR64 and Ubi:SPIKE. Spikelet number per panicle (C) and ag leaf width (D) of IR64 (n = 17)
and Ubi:SPIKE plants carrying a single copy (n = 20) and ve copies (n = 13). (E) Morphologies of NIL-SPIKE plant and transgenic plant in which SPIKE is
silenced by amiRNA. (F) Panicle structures of NIL-SPIKE and transgenic plants. Spikelet number per panicle (G) and ag leaf width (H) of NIL-SPIKE (n = 5) and
of amiRNA1 (n = 4) and amiRNA4 transgenic plants (n = 3). Values are means, with whiskers showing SD. Results of TukeyKramer test for multiple comparisons at the 5% level are shown in C, D, G, and H. (Scale bars: A and E, 20 cm; B and F, 5 cm.) Means labeled with different letters (a, b, c) differ signicantly.
Fujita et al.
AGRICULTURAL
SCIENCES
Fig. 2. Map-based cloning and expression analysis of SPIKE. (A) A high-resolution map narrowed the SPIKE locus to an 18.0-kbp region between Ind4 and
Ind12. The candidate gene is indicated in red. The squares indicate an artifact of gene model prediction. Numbers below the map show the number of
recombinants. (B) Semiquantitative expression analysis of SPIKE in culm, leaf, leaf sheath, and root of IR64 and NIL-SPIKE (NIL). (C and D) Production of GUS
driven by the NIL-SPIKE promoter in cross-sections of crown roots and lateral roots (C) and young panicles (D). (Scale bars: C, 50 m; D, 2 mm.) (E) Quantitative
expression analysis of SPIKE in 3- to 5-, 6- to 10-, 11- to 20-, and 21- to 50-mm stages of young panicle of IR64 and NIL-SPIKE. Expression is calibrated to the
3- to 5-mm panicle stage of IR64. Values are means of three replications, with whiskers showing SEM. Signicant at *5%; n.s., not signicant.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101112
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101112 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101112
F
Popular cultivars in Southeast Asia
PSBRc18 (Philippines), TDK1 (Laos), Ciherang (Indonesia)
200
150
PSBRc18
TDK1
TDK1
-SPIKE
P=0.0002
***
200
150
100
50
0
250
Spikelet number
100
0.4
50
0
BR11
BR11
-SPIKE
250
150
0.8
50
200
1.2
***
100
P=0.0224
***
1.6
P=0.0002
150
50
Swarna
Swarna
-SPIKE
50
PSBRc18
-SPIKE
50
250
200
100
Spikelet number
100
E2.0
IRRI146
565
IRRI146SPIKE
200
100 479
0
150
IRRI146-SPIKE
IRRI146SPIKE
400
300
200
IRRI146
500
***
IRRI146SPIKE
600
D250
Spikelet number per panicle
IRRI146
C700
IRRI146
150
100
P=0.0462
Ciherang
-SPIKE
200
250
Ciherang
Spikelet number
P=0.0184
Spikelet number
250
SPIKE
IRRI146
YP4
Spikelet number
SPIKE
Fig. 4. SPIKE increases grain yield in indica genetic background. (A and B) Gene location (blue ellipses) and plant morphology of New Plant Type cultivar YP4
(A) and IRRI146 and IRRI146-SPIKE (B). (Scale bars: 20 cm.) (CE) Comparison between IRRI146 and IRRI146-SPIKE of grain weight per m2 (C), spikelet number
per panicle (D), and ag leaf width (E) (n = 10). (F) Comparison of spikelet number per panicle between indica cultivars with and without SPIKEPSBRc18
(from Philippines, n = 10), TDK1 (from Laos, n = 10), Ciherang (from Indonesia, n = 13), Swarna (from India, n = 17), and BR11 (from Bangladesh, n = 27)
characterized in the eld at IRRI, Philippines. Values are means, with whiskers showing SE. Signicant at ***0.1%; **1%; *5%.
NIL-SPIKE, which was developed from IL YTH326, stably increased grain yield in the IR64 genetic background at the crop
level in the eld. This approach opens the way to efciently identifying genes that increase grain yield.
SPIKE had pleiotropic effects on several traits, increasing
TSN, FLW, RDW, panicle neck diameter, and VBN, but decreasing the 1,000-grain weight and panicle number. Among
components of sink size, SPIKE notably increased secondary
panicle branches as well as Gn1a (7). The consequent increase
in spikelets on secondary branches usually increases competition for assimilate supply, resulting in abortion (28, 29). To
our surprise, however, the grain fertility of NIL-SPIKE was improved compared with that of IR64. This improvement might be
explained by increased VBN contributing to assimilate supply to
spikelets on the secondary branches. NPT breeding aims at an
ideal plant architecture characterized by fewer, larger panicles
and large leaves (18). These morphological effects of SPIKE were
mostly corresponding to ideal plant architecture in NPT breeding.
The introduction of SPIKE into indica elite cultivars gave the
desired morphological effects. This study reports a gene that
increases grain yield of indica rice through enlarging sink size,
source size, and translocation capacity.
Many QTLs for morphological traits, including leaf size, spikelet
number, panicle number, and root volume, occur in a cluster on
the long arm of chromosome 4 (http://qtaro.abr.affrc.go.jp). In this
region, where SPIKE was identied, several QTLs for TSN have
been detected, among which the alleles from japonica or tropical
japonica cultivars increased TSN (3038). Hitherto, no gene for
TSN or grain yield in this cluster has been isolated (39). Through
high-resolution mapping, we identied SPIKE, which inuences
TSN and FLW. Transgenic analysis revealed that SPIKE was
identical to Nal1, which affects vein patterning in leaves and
polar auxin transport (23). SPIKE, identied from natural variation, is a unique allele from tropical japonica, whereas nal1,
identied from a mutant line, is a loss-of-function mutation. The
nal1 mutant was reduced in TSN compared with wild type, whereas
Fujita et al.
Fujita et al.
AGRICULTURAL
SCIENCES
paper reports the results obtained in an IRRIJapan Collaborative Research Project supported by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and the Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry, and Fisheries of Japan. The work was
supported by Japan Society for the Promotion of Science Fellows Grantin-Aid 23-7274.
1. Cassman KG, Dobermann A, Walters DT, Yang H (2003) Meeting cereal demand while
protecting natural resources and improving environmental quality. Annu Rev Environ
Resour 28:315358.
2. Seck PA, Diagne A, Mohanty S, Wopereis MCS (2012) Crops that feed the world 7:
Rice. Food Secur 4(1):724.
3. Zhao K, et al. (2011) Genome-wide association mapping reveals a rich genetic architecture of complex traits in Oryza sativa. Nat Commun 2:467.
4. Huang X, et al. (2012) A map of rice genome variation reveals the origin of cultivated
rice. Nature 490(7421):497501.
5. Zeigler RS, Barclay A (2008) The relevance of rice. Rice 1(1):310.
6. Fitzgerald MA, McCouch SR, Hall RD (2009) Not just a grain of rice: The quest for
quality. Trends Plant Sci 14(3):133139.
7. Ashikari M, et al. (2005) Cytokinin oxidase regulates rice grain production. Science
309(5735):741745.
8. Ikeda-Kawakatsu K, et al. (2009) Expression level of ABERRANT PANICLE ORGANIZATION1
determines rice inorescence form through control of cell proliferation in the meristem.
Plant Physiol 150(2):736747.
9. Terao T, Nagata K, Morino K, Hirose T (2010) A gene controlling the number of primary rachis branches also controls the vascular bundle formation and hence is responsible to increase the harvest index and grain yield in rice. Theor Appl Genet
120(5):875893.
10. Fan C, et al. (2006) GS3, a major QTL for grain length and weight and minor QTL for
grain width and thickness in rice, encodes a putative transmembrane protein. Theor
Appl Genet 112(6):11641171.
11. Song XJ, Huang W, Shi M, Zhu MZ, Lin HX (2007) A QTL for rice grain width and
weight encodes a previously unknown RING-type E3 ubiquitin ligase. Nat Genet 39(5):
623630.
12. Shomura A, et al. (2008) Deletion in a gene associated with grain size increased yields
during rice domestication. Nat Genet 40(8):10231028.
13. Huang X, et al. (2009) Natural variation at the DEP1 locus enhances grain yield in rice.
Nat Genet 41(4):494497.
14. Miura K, et al. (2010) OsSPL14 promotes panicle branching and higher grain productivity in rice. Nat Genet 42(6):545549.
15. Ookawa T, et al. (2010) New approach for rice improvement using a pleiotropic QTL
gene for lodging resistance and yield. Nat Commun 1:132.
16. Xue W, et al. (2008) Natural variation in Ghd7 is an important regulator of heading
date and yield potential in rice. Nat Genet 40(6):761767.
17. Miura K, Ashikari M, Matsuoka M (2011) The role of QTLs in the breeding of highyielding rice. Trends Plant Sci 16(6):319326.
18. Khush GS (1995) Breaking the yield frontier of rice. GeoJournal 35(3):329332.
19. Peng S, Cassman KG, Virmani SS, Sheehy J, Khush GS (1999) Yield potential trends of
tropical rice since the release of IR8 and the challenge of increasing rice yield potential. Crop Sci 39(6):15521559.
20. Peng S, Khush GS, Virk P, Tang Q, Zou Y (2008) Progress in ideotype breeding to
increase rice yield potential. Field Crops Res 108(1):3238.
21. Fujita D, et al. (2009) Development of introgression lines of an indica-type rice variety,
IR64, for unique agronomic traits and detection of the responsible chromosomal
regions. Field Crops Res 114(2):244254.
22. Fujita D, Tagle AG, Ebron LA, Fukuta Y, Kobayashi N (2012) Characterization of nearisogenic lines carrying QTL for high spikelet number with the genetic background of
an indica rice variety IR64 (Oryza sativa L.). Breed Sci 62(1):1826.
23. Qi J, et al. (2008) Mutation of the rice Narrow leaf1 gene, which encodes a novel
protein, affects vein patterning and polar auxin transport. Plant Physiol 147(4):
19471959.
24. Brennan JP, Malabayabas A (2011) Impacts of IRRI germplasm on the Philippines
since 1985. International Rice Research Institutes Contribution to Rice Varietal Yield
Improvement in South-East Asia. ACIAR Impact Assessment Series Report No. 74 (Aust
Cent Intl Agric Res, Canberra, Australia), pp 2543.
Septiningsih EM, et al. (2003) Identication of quantitative trait loci for yield and
yield components in an advanced backcross population derived from the Oryza sativa
variety IR64 and the wild relative O. rupogon. Theor Appl Genet 107(8):14191432.
Thomson MJ, et al. (2003) Mapping quantitative trait loci for yield, yield components
and morphological traits in an advanced backcross population between Oryza rupogon and the Oryza sativa cultivar Jefferson. Theor Appl Genet 107(3):479493.
Zhang H, et al. (2013) Simultaneous improvement and genetic dissection of grain
yield and its related traits in a backbone parent of hybrid rice (Oryza sativa L.) using
selective introgression. Mol Breed 31(1):181194.
Ishimaru T, Matsuda T, Ohsugi R, Yamagishi T (2003) Morphological development of
rice caryopses located at the different positions in a panicle from early to middle
stage of grain lling. Funct Plant Biol 30(11):11391149.
Lisle AJ, Martin M, Fitzgerald MA (2000) Chalky and translucent rice grains differ in
starch composition and structure and cooking properties. Am Assoc Cereal Chem
77(5):627632.
Wu P, Zhang G, Huang N (1996) Identication of QTLs controlling quantitative
characters in rice using RFLP markers. Euphytica 89(3):349354.
Li Z, Pinson SRM, Park WD, Paterson AH, Stansel JW (1997) Epistasis for three grain
yield components in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Genetics 145(2):453465.
He P, et al. (2001) Comparison of molecular linkage maps and agronomic trait loci
between DH and RIL populations derived from the same rice cross. Crop Sci 41(4):
12401246.
Latte HR, Courtois B, Arraudeau M (2002) Genetic improvement of rice in aerobic
systems: Progress from yield to genes. Field Crops Res 75(2-3):171190.
Hittalmani S, et al. (2003) Identication of QTL for growth- and grain yield-related
traits in rice across nine locations of Asia. Theor Appl Genet 107(4):679690.
Yamagishi J, Miyamoto N, Hirotsu S, Laza RC, Nemoto K (2004) QTLs for branching,
oret formation, and pre-owering oret abortion of rice panicle in a temperate
japonica x tropical japonica cross. Theor Appl Genet 109(8):15551561.
Takai T, Fukuta Y, Shiraiwa T, Horie T (2005) Time-related mapping of quantitative
trait loci controlling grain-lling in rice (Oryza sativa L.). J Exp Bot 56(418):21072118.
Zou GH, et al. (2005) Grain yield responses to moisture regimes in a rice population:
Association among traits and genetic markers. Theor Appl Genet 112(1):106113.
Ding X, Li X, Xiong L (2011) Evaluation of near-isogenic lines for drought resistance
QTL and ne mapping of a locus affecting ag leaf width, spikelet number, and root
volume in rice. Theor Appl Genet 123(5):815826.
Yonemaru J, et al. (2010) Q-TARO: QTL annotation rice online database. Rice 3(2-3):
194203.
Singh US, et al. (2013) Field performance, dissemination, impact and tracking of
submergence tolerant (Sub1) rice varieties in South Asia. SABRAO J 45(1):112131.
Yoshimura A, Ideta O, Iwata N (1997) Linkage map of phenotype and RFLP markers in
rice. Plant Mol Biol 35(1-2):4960.
Hiei Y, Komari T (2006) Improved protocols for transformation of indica rice mediated
by Agrobacterium tumefaciens. Plant Cell Tiss Org 85(3):271283.
Warthmann N, Chen H, Ossowski S, Weigel D, Herv P (2008) Highly specic gene
silencing by articial miRNAs in rice. PLoS ONE 3(3):e1829.
Jefferson RA, Kavanagh TA, Bevan MW (1987) GUS fusions: -glucuronidase as
a sensitive and versatile gene fusion marker in higher plants. EMBO J 6(13):
39013907.
Mori Y, Nishimura T, Koshiba T (2005) Vigorous synthesis of indole-3-acetic acid in the
apical very tip leads to a constant basipetal ow of the hormone in maize coleoptiles.
Plant Sci 168(2):467473.
Nishimura T, Mori Y, Furukawa T, Kadota A, Koshiba T (2006) Red light causes a reduction in IAA levels at the apical tip by inhibiting de novo biosynthesis from tryptophan in maize coleoptiles. Planta 224(6):14271435.
20436 | www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.1310790110
25.
26.
27.
28.
29.
30.
31.
32.
33.
34.
35.
36.
37.
38.
39.
40.
41.
42.
43.
44.
45.
46.
Fujita et al.