Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
THE PASSIVE
Complex linguistic phenomenon, which manifests itself at three levels of linguistic
analysis:
a) the morphological level the auxiliaries be and get and the past participle of the verb
b) the syntactic level a change in position and status of the active Subject and Object
c) the semantic level a change in the relation between the underlying role-structure of the
sentence and its organization. The agent (subject) no longer appears in the subject position in the
sentence, while the patient (the object) appears in subject position.
Stylistically speaking, the Passive makes the discourse more objective, what is important
is not the agent anymore, but the event denoted by the verb itself.
The Passive Morphology be + the past participle. Passive verbs behave like
unaccusative verbs. The external theta role of the verb that undergoes passivization is
absorbed by the passive morphology, namely the past participle of the verb. The verb is
generated from the Lexicon as passive, that is as an unaccusative that only has an internal
argument which has to move to [Spec, IP] in order to be assigned case and also to satisfy
the Extended Projection Principle. Being an unaccusative verb it does not theta-mark an
external argument so it cannot assign Accusative case. The internal argument moves to
[Spec, IP] and leaves behind a trace that forms a chain with the moved constituent <DP i ,
ti > The external argument of the original active verb can be recovered in the passive
sentence as a prepositional phrase headed by the preposition BY which assigns it the
theta role Agent as well as case or it can be implicit.
Eg. The professor was invited.
IP
DP
I
I0
VP
V0
VP
-ed
BE
V
V0
Invited
DP
the professor
Conditions on the Passive the adjacency constraint (the double object construction; the
dative verbs) (even with non-arguments of the verb)
Eg. (1) She gave a book to me. / A book was given to me. / *I was given a book to.
She gave me a book. / I was given a book. / *A book was given me.
(1)She wore her pullover thin.
Her pullover was worn thin.
(2)He shouted us into silence.
We were shouted into silence
- no reflexives and reciprocals (He watched himself. / *Himself was watched by him)
- no idiomatic IT ( This argument eats it. / *IT is eaten by this argument.)
they are one argument verbs, the agent is not overt in the sentence. It may be understood
as one or people in general, although it may be specific at times.
Eg. The car handles smoothly when John drives it.
Unaccusatives do not have an external argument, not even an implicit one, so they can
co-occur with all by itself, in the sense that something happens without external aid,
agentlessly, unlike middles.
Eg. The boat sank all by itself.
*The play acts well all by itself.
The meaning contribution of the subject of a middle sentence is different from the
meaning contribution of the subject in a passive sentence, as the theta roles assigned to
the subjects of a middle sentence are very different.
Eg. The book reads easily. [Theme]
Children scare easily. [Experiencer]
The truck loads easily. [Location]
Eg. The book reads easily. (It can be paraphrased as the book has the necessary properties that
allow it to read easily. Somehow the subject is responsible for the action denoted by the verb.)
The book was easily read.
In an unaccusative sentence the subject cannot be interpreted as responsible because it refers to a
concrete entity.
Eg. The door opens with difficulty.
So, the subject of a middle sentence is an entity, a non-Agent which is responsible for the action
denoted by the verb, in the sense that it has the necessary properties which make the situation
denoted by the verb possible.
Middles are generic sentences that do not describe particular events in time. They are
seen as stative, atelic predicates, like individual level predicates. They are compatible
with always and incompatible with the progressive. When they occur in the progressive
they denote a change between successive stages. They do not occur in the imperative.
Eg. This book always reads easily.
The manuscript is reading better and better.
*Handle smoothly, car!
Middles generally occur with obligatory modifications. It can be a Manner Adverbial, a
Locative Adverbial, a clausal modifier (non-purpose), a negative operator or an overt
modal verb. The role of the modifier is to stativize the predicate.
Eg. This book translates easily. (Manner)
Make sure the address reads through window. (Place)
Officials bribe before reaching high office. (Adverbial clause of time)
This text does not translate. (Negation)
This text will not translate. (overt modal and negation)
Agent oriented adverbs are not allowed in middle sentences.
I
I0
VP
T
-s
PP
By PRO
V
AvP
easily
V
V0
Wash
DP
the fabric