Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
JANE ADDAMS
Jane Addams. was born September 6, 1860. Having a
medical education Interrupted by illness, she travelled in
Europe extensively for two years. While there she became interested in Toynbee Hall, a settlement house, in
the notorious Whitechapel industrial district of London.
Upon her return to the United States she determined to
establish a similar project. Purchasing the home which
Charles Hull had built in Chicago in 1856 she, and some
persons in sympathy with her project, moved into what
was to become famous as "Hull House" on September
18,1889.
She entered the battle for juvenile courts, tenement
house regulation, an eighthour day for women, factory
inspection, workmen's compensation, women's suffrage,
and justice for both immigrants and Blacks.
In 1910 she became the first president of the National Conference of Social Work. In 1919 she became President of the Women's International League for Peace and
Freedom. She opposed the entry of the U.S Into World
War I and in 1931 won the Nobel pnze for her efforts for
world peace.
We are all indebted to Jane Addams, an open Atheist,
(who died on May 21, 1935 and we salute her in the
month of her birth, the month of the opening of Hull
House.
H. G. WELLS
H. G. Wells was born on September 21,1866 and died
on August 13, 1946. We know from his association with
our own Baron Avro Manhattan that he was an Atheist.
No reference book cites him as the author of the infamous Crux Ansata, An Indictment of The Roman
Catholic Church written in 1943. Yet when asked concerned with this church what his feelings were, in interview he stated:
"1 think that it stands for everything most hostile to
the mental emancipation and stimulation of mankind. It
is the completest, most highly organized system of prejudices and antagonisms in existence. Everywhere in the
world there are ignorance and prejudice, bu the greatest
complex of these, with the most extensive prestige and
the most intimate entanglement with traditional institutions, is the Roman Catholic Church. It presents many
laces toward the world, but everywhere it is systematic
in its fig,ht against freedom"
Copies of Crux Ansata were confiscated by Customs
Officials when first it was tried to irnport Tt into the
United States. The manuscript finally was sent in as a
private letter to obtain an edition for our country.
We honor H. G. Wells, in this month of his birth.
FRUCTIDOR
NEWS
Bagels and Foulwell
Second
National
- International
Annual
'.' .. , .....
Picnic
FEATURED
.....
Intrigue
COLUMNISTS
- James E. Brodhead
14
- Fred Woodworth
16
- Gerald Tholen
17
- Atheists
Masters:
American
19
FEATURES
as Outcasts
Atheist
- Bertrand
Russell
Poems
13
21
'
24
,::
Editor-in-Chief
Madalyn
Murray
O'Hair
Managing Editor
Jon G. Murray
Artist
Felix Santana
Poetry
Angeline Bennett
Robin Eileen Murray-O'Hair
Gerald Tholen
Production
Staff
David Kent
Richard Richardson
Ralph Shirley
Richard Smith
Gerald Tholen
Gloria Tholen
Non-resident Staff
James E. Brodhead
Ignatz Sahula-Dycke
Fred Woodworth
Austin, Texas
The American
Atheist magazine is
published
monthly
by the American
Atheist Center, 2210 Hancock Drive,
Austin, TX 78756, a non-profit,
nonpolitical, educational organization.
Mailing address:
P. O. Box 2117, .
Austin, TX 78768.
~ 198.1 by
Society of Separationists,
Inc.
Subscription
rates: $25/ one year;
$40jtwo years.
Manuscripts
s u b rn it t ed. must be
typed, double-spaced, accompanied by a
stamped, self-addressed
envelope. The
editors assume no responsibility
for
unsolicited manuscripts.
The American Atheist magazine
is indexed in
MONTHLY PERIODICAL
INDEX
$UPPORT
AMERICAN ATHEI$M
ISSN: 0032-4310
(ructidor
IV
(September)
11981
Page I
EDITORIAL
Atheists as Outcasts
Last month I commented on the case of Marsa v. Wernik,
which has been decided by the Supreme Court of the State of
New Jersey. That case involved the opening of borough
council meetings with prayer or an "invocation". Since the
time of the Marsa decision, The American Atheist Center
has filed two new important Establishment
cases in two
different states in quick succession. These were filed in
Arkansas and Mississippi on the 14th and 15th of July
respectively.
In order to understand their importance and why they
were filed we need to look at a little history. Five states of the
Union have sections in their constitutions that speak to the
rights of Atheists. These states are North Carolina, South
Carolina, Arkansas, Mississippi, and Texas. In each state a
"belief in God" is required as a prerequisite to holding public
office. Back in 1979 the constitution of North Carolina was
challenged in a suit filed by the Charlotte Chapter of
American Atheists. That suit never came to trial, because
the governor and attorney general of North Carolina both
admitted to the unconstitutionality
of the belief requirement. As a result a "consent decree" was signed by all
involved to declare the requirement of belief in god to be
unconstitutional,
and this decree was then issued by a
Federal District Court.
A similar case filed in Texas has not been met with similar
cooperation
from that state's authorities.
It has been
opposed since 1977, and now rests in the Fifth Federal
Circuit Court of Appeals in New Orleans, Louisiana. The
State of Texas has spent tens of thousands of dollars of
taxpayer funds fighting this case, and shows no sign of
giving up yet. The Appeals Court itself has had a rather odd
reaction to the case, however, doing something that it has
very rarely done in its history. When the Texas case first
reached the appellate level, oral arguments were heard and
the court upheld the Texas constitution by a vote of two to
one (with a three judge panel). Thedecision was sent back
down to the Federal District Court in Austin, Texas,
remained on the desk of the Federal District judge for about
one week, and was recalled by the three judges of the Fifth
Circuit Appeals Court. Since the "recall" both sides have
been puzzled as to what the Fifth Circuit had up its sleeve.
No word came from the court for several months.
While the recall of the Texas case was pending further
action, The American Atheist Center filed the two actions in
Arkansas and Mississippi. Article 19, Section I of the
Arkansas Constitution
says, "No person who denies the
being of God shall hold any office in the civil departments of
this State, nor be competent to testify as a witness in any
Court." Article 14, Section 265 of the Mississippi Constitution says, "No person who denies the existence of a Supreme
Being shall hold any office in this state." Both of these
provisions can be seen to be clearly, on their face, abrogations of the rights of Atheists in those two states. Yet, prelim-
inary indications are that both states are willing to fight for
these provisions. no matter what the cost or how long the
struggle.
To give you an idea of how the people of these two states
regard these laws: In Mississippi a former attorney general,
while in office, remarked that he thought the provision in his
state's constitution was valid and that it would serve to see
that only "good" men occupied public office. He felt and said
that anyone who could look at the flowers and not see the
wonder of god's handiwork was insane, and that the state
had a legitimate right to keep insane persons out of public
office. When American Atheists went to Jackson, Mississippi, to file the action on behalf of an Atheist and member
in that state, the organization was unable to find an attorney
in the Jackson area - or the state, for that matter - with
the courage to represent them. One attorney came to the
motel room of Dr. O'Hair and myself and said that he would
be ruined if he associated himself with the word" Atheist"
publicly in the state. He said that he must think of his family
and children, and that he would never be able to practice his
vocation of law again if he associated with "Atheism". To
this date no attorney in the state of Mississippi has come
forward to handle the case. As a result, the individual
Atheist involved had to file "pro se", tackling the case on his
own until such time as counsel could be found. The local
Atheist involved is in his 80s. The entire legal community of
the state of Mississippi is afraid to challenge a law that is
blatantly unconstitutional.
and are willing to be led by an
octogenarian.
In Arkansas,
official reaction seems to lJ~ that the
provision in the state's constitution has not been enforced in
recent years and therefore does not merit consideration for a
change. From their view, discriminatory
law is permissible
as long as it is in form only and not in application. Form is,
however, very important. If the state can deny a section of its
population
full rights on paper, it has set the tone for
discrimination on all other levels of daily life, both business
and personal, against that section by the general population.
States such as Arkansas know that they dare not enforce
such discriminatory
provisions in their constitutions, since
the act of enforcement would give standing to a member of
the class discriminated against, to allow the courts to strike
it. A state creates a law, allows it to become vestigial, and
then claims that its vestigial character makes changing it
unnecessary and gives grounds for resisting that change.
Only those laws which are meritorious in their own right
and enforced or are enforceable should be on the books. If a
law is ceremonial only and is not enforced, what is the
purpose of its continued maintenance as a law? It is like an
official at a sporting event insisting on keeping a rule in the
rule book that is never enforced on the field of play and is
considered to have no bearing on the outcome thereof. Yet,
over and over again government entities argue for the retencontinued on page 24
Page 2
Fructidor
(September)
11981
American
Atheist
'\
Should an Atheist wonder who and what controls our foreign policy, it is not
necessary to look afar. The concept is that judeo/christianity
is the bulwark
against Atheistic/Communism.
Hence it is urgently important to keep the jewish
religion ensconced in Jerusalem, since this was the heritage source of christianity. Therefore,
it axiomatically
follows that we must send $3 billion a year to '
Israel to keep a footing for judeo/christianity
in Israel else the heretical muslims
and the gotterdammerung Communist/Atheists
may move into that area.
It is no suprise therefore when the fanatical religious zealot who rules Israel
to the detriment
of the non-believers who inhabit that nation suddenly decided
to bomb the ancient whore (Babylon) on the Pentecost.
Using the outworn
holocaust theme Israeli planes destroyed
Iraq's Tammuz Nuclear Center, which
now is admitted by all to have posed no threat to Israel.
The White House received notice of the attack three hours after the raid,
since Israel desired to save the shipment of the F-16s so that it could continue its
fight for lebensraum and for Drang noch Westen.
But, the real power was recognized when Prime Minister Bagel telephoned
Jerry Foulsmell three days later to explain the rationale behind his terrorist
raid, knowing that fundamentalist
christians know and accept terrorism.
The
call was to express Bagel's deep appreciation
for the friendship of bible-believing christians
in the United States. He wanted
Foulsmell to explain to the
christian public (to hell with the Atheists, agnostics, humanists and sundry) the
reasons for the bombing.
Foulsmell felt that the United States should be congratulating
Israel instead of condemning
it and assu;ed him of the support of
"bible-believing
christians."
Later Foulsmell strongly condemned
the National
Council of Churches which had criticized Bagel after the unprovoked
Israeli attack.
The exchange was not done.
Menachem Bagel felt the need of sending an international
telegram to Foulsmell for the support he had given terrorism. The telegram read:
"Dear Friend, Your statement was broadcast on Israeli radio and made a great
impression on all the people of the country.
I am deeply grateful for your help
emanating from real friendship for Israel. God bless you for your incessant efforts in the service of a just cause. Rabbi Schindler told me about your meeting
and I was happy to see real reconciliation
between you. Your common stand in
love and courage will be of great importance
in the future. Yours sincerely,
Menachem Begin."
The jewish attack against their semite brothers,
""Operation Babylon," was
scheduled
three times. The Iraqi name for its atomic plant, Tammuz 17, is
incidentally the date of the beginning of a traditional fast, since Tammuz 17th is
"the lunar date beginning of an old testament
fast common to the traditions of
the muslim semites as well as the jewish semites.
In this case, one religious fanatic, Bagel, reached out to another, Foulsmell.
And it is patently obvious that if the reasonable persons in the United States and
in the world continue to maintain their silence in the .face of such gross idiocy,
it does not bode well for humankind.
TILL
*
.
DEATH DO US PART
It is urgently
important,
therefore,
for you to see that your input is available
to the Comission and we suggest that you
write the Atheist viewpoint to the Commission's office:
Commission for The Study of
Ethical Problems in Medicine and
Biomedical and Behavioral Research
Suite 555
2000 K Street, N. W.
Washington, D. C. 20006
\
The news is chosen to demonstrate;
month after month, the dead reactionary
hand of religion.!"t dictates your habits, sexual
conduct, family size. It censures cinema, theater, television, even education.
It dictates life values and lifestyles. Religion is politics and, always, the most authoritarian
and reactionary
politics. We editorialize
our news to emphasize this thesis. Unlike any
other magazine or newspaper in the United States, we say so.
Austin, Texas
Page 3
.focus on ~tbrtsts
Second
Petersburg,
Annual
Summer
Picnic
Solstice
11981
The Summer Solstice Picnic is held each year, about June 21st, which is usually the Summer Solstice, at the American Atheist
imagined, created and achieved by lloyd Thoren, American Atheist extaordinaire.
We salute you lloyd for your vision
and your dedication to the life supporting concepts of Atheism. We all thank you - and some of us love you - Mr. T.
Inside the museum lloyd, and Pam who is the Curator of the Museum, have focused attention on two slogans - one theistic,
one Atheistic. The former Quia Credo Absurdum Est translates to "What is absurd is that which is believed;" the latter Damnant
Quod Non "Intelligent affirms "They condemn that which they do not understand."
Outside the Museum the single sign which
has brought out more closet Atheists than any other' effort staunchly proclaims: "If you cannot speak your mind, you are a.
slave. "
! Museum
Page 4
Fructidor
(September)
119R1
American
Atheist
Austin, Texas
Fructidor
(September)
11981
Page 5
Uncle
Henry
grilled
endless
stacks of sausages - and the good
odors hung over the entire enclave.
Page 6
Fructidor
(September)
~I
119RI
American
Atheist
..
Austin, Texas
Fructidor
(September)
11981
Page 7
THE FAITH OF
A RATIONALIST
When I try to discover what are the original sources of
my opinions, both practical and theoretical, I find that
most of them spring ultimately from admiration for two
qualities'kindly feeling and veracity. To begin with
kindly feeling: most of the social and political evils of the
world arise through absence of sympathy and presence
of hatred, envy, or fear. Hostile feelings of this sort are
common between nations; at many times they have
existed between different classes or different creeds
within one nation; in many professions envy is an
obstacle to the recognition of Negroes, contempt for all
who are not white, have brought and are bringing
suffering to would-be oppressors as well as to those
whom they have sought to oppress. Every kind of hostile
action or feelinq provokes a reaction by. which it is
increased and so generates a progeny of violence-and
injustice which has a terrible vitality. This can only be
met by cultivating in ourselves and attempting to
generate in the young feelings of friendliness rather
than hostility, of well-wishing ratherthan malevolence,
and of cooperation rather than competition.
If I am asked "Why do you believe this?" I should not
appeal to any supernatural authority, but only to the
general wish for happiness. A world full of hate is a
world full of sorrow. Each party, where there is mutual
hatred, hopes that the other party will suffer, but this is
seldom the case. And even the most successful oppressors are filled with tear - slave-owners, for example, have been obsessed with dread of a servile insurrection. ,From the point of view of worldly wisdom,
hostile feeling and limitation of sympathy are folly. Their
fruits are war, death, oppression, and torture, not only
for their original victims but in the long run, also for
their perpetrators or their descendants. Whereas if we
could all learn to love our neighbors the world would
quickly become a paradise for us all.
Veracity, which I regard as second only to kindly
feeling, consists broadly in believing according to evidence and not because a belief is comfortable or a
source of pleasure. In the absence of veracity, kindly
feeling will often be defeated by self-deception. It used
to be common for the rich to maintain either that it is.
pleasant to be poor or that poverty is the result of
Page 8
Fructidor
(September)
IV
shiftlessness. Some healthy people argue that all illness is self-indulgence. I have heard fox-hunters argue
that the fox likes being hunted. It is easy for those who
have exceptional power to persuade themselves that
the system by which they profit gives more happiness to
the under-dog than he would enjoy under a more just
system. And even where no obvious bias is involved, it is
only by means of veracity that we can acquire the
scientific knowledge required tobr inq out our common
purposes. Consider how many cherished prejudices had
to be abandoned in the development of modern medicine and hygiene. To take a different kind of illustration:
how many wars would have been prevented if the side
which was ultimately defeated had formed a just
estimate of its prospects instead of one based on conceit
and wish-fulfillment!
Veracity, or love of truth, ISdefined by John Locke as
"not entertaining any proposition with greater assurance than the proofs it is built upon will warrant." This
definition is admirable in regard to all those matters as
to which proof may reasonably be demanded. But since
proofs need premises, it is impossible to prove anything
unless some things are accepted without proof. We
must therefore ask ourselves. What sort of thing IS It
reasonable to believe without proof? I should reply: The
facts of sense-experience and the principles of mathematics and logic - including the inductive logic employed in science. These are things which we can hardly
bring ourselves to doubt and as to which there is a large
measure of agreement among mankind. But in matters
as to which men disagree, or as to which our own
convictions are wavering, we should look for proofs, or,
if proofs cannot be found, we should be content to
confess ignorance.
11981
American
Atheist
"
Austin, Texas
Fructidor
(September)
11981
Page 9
Page IO
Fructidor
(September)
IY
11981
American
Atheist
I
;,.
Austin, Texas
"Thequestion of the
objectivity of fact has been
rendered difficult by the
obfuscations of philosophers. "
.Iost sight of the purpose which has mainly inspired
Freud and his followers. Their method is primarily one.of .
therapeutics, a way of curing hysteria and various kinds
of insanity. During the war psycho-analysis proved to be
far the most potent treatment for war-neuroses. Ri,
vers's Instinct and the Unconscious, which is largel")'
based upon experience of "shell-shock" patients, gives
a beautiful analysis of the morbid effects of fear when it ."
cannot be straightforwardly indulged. These effects, of
course, are largely non-intellectual; they include various kinds of paralysis, and all sorts of apparently
physical ailments. With these, for the moment, weare
not concerned; it is intellectual derangements that form
our theme. It is found that many of the delusions of
lunatics result from instinctive obstructions, and can be
cured by purely mental means - i.e. by making the
patient bring to mind facts of which he had repressed
the memory. This kind of treatment, and the outlook
which inspires it, pre-suppose an ideal of sanity, from
which the patient has departed, and to which heis to be
brought back by making him conscious of all the
relevant facts, including those which he most wishes to
forget. This is the exact opposite of those Who only know
that psychoanalysis has shown the prevalence of irrational beliefs, and who forget or ignore that -its
purpose is to diminish this prevalence by a definite
method of medical treatment. A closely similar method
can cure the irrationalities of those wfio are not recognized lunatics, provided they will submit to treatment by a practitioner free from their delusions. Presidents, Cabinet Ministers, and Eminent Persons, how-
ever, seldom fulfill this condition, and therefore r.emain
uncured.
So far, we have been considering only the theoretical
side of rationality. The practical side, to which we must
now turn our attention, is more difficult. Differences of
opinion on practical questions spring from two sources:
first, differences between the desires of the disputants; .
secondly differences in their estimates of the means of -.
realizing their desires. Differences of the second kind
'are really theoretical, and only derivatively practical. For
example, some authorities hold that our first line of
defence should consist of battleships, others that it
should consist of aeroplanes. Here there is no difterenceas regards the end proposed, namely, national
defence, but only as to the means. The arqurnent can
therefore be conducted in a purely scientific manner,
since the disagreement which causes the dispute is
only as to facts, present or future, certain or probable. To
all such cases the kind of rationality which I called
theoretical applies,. in spite of the fact that a practical
Page 11-
issue is involved.
indulging the desire which he happens to feel most
There is however, in many cases which appear to
strongly at the moment, he will thwart other desires
come under this head a complication which is very
which in the long run are more important to him. If men
important in pr actrce. A man who desrr es to act In a
were rational, they would take a more correct view of
certain way will persuade himself that by so acting he
their own interest than they do at present; and if all men
will achieve some end which he considers good, even
acted from enlightened self-interest the world would be
a paradise in comparison with what it is. I do not
when. if he had no such desire. he would see no reason
for such a belief. And he will judge quite differently as to
maintain that there is nothing better than self-interest
matters of fact and as to probabilities from the way in
as a motive to action; but I do maintain that self-interest.
which a man with contrary desires will judge. Gamblike altruism. is better when it is enlightened than when
lers, as everyone knows. are full of irrational beliefs as
it is unenlightened. In an ordered community it ISvery
to systems which must lead them to win in the long run.
rarely to a man's interest to do anything which is very
People who take an interest in politics persuade themharmful to others. The less rational a man is, the oftener
selves that the leaders of their party would never be
he will fail to perceive how what injures others also
guilty of the knavish tricks practised by opposing poliinjures him, because hatred or envy will blind him.
ticians. Men who like administration think that it is good
Therefore, although I do not pretend that enlightened
for the populace to be treated like a herd of sheep. men
self-interest is the highest morality, I do mantain that. if
who like tobacco say that it soothes the nerves, and men
it became common, it would make the world an imwho like alcohol say that it stimulates wit. The bias
measurably better place than it is.
produced by such causes falsifies men's judgments as
Rationality in practice may be defined as the habit of
to facts in a way which is very hard to avoid. Even a
remembering all our relevant desires, and not only the
learned scientific article about the effects of alcohol on
one which happens at the moment to be strongest. Like
the nervous system will generally betray by internal
rationality in opinion, it is a matter of degree. Complete
rationality is no doubt an unattainable ideal, but so long
evidence whether the author is or not a teetotaller; in
either case he has a tendency to see the facts in the way
as we continue to classify some men as luoatics it IS
that would justify his own practice. In politics and
clear that we think some men more rational Ulan others.
I believe that all solid progress In the world consists of
religion such considerations become very important.
an increase in rationality, both practical and theoretical.
Most men think that in framing their political opinions
To preach an altruistic morality appears to me somethey are actuated by desire for the public good; but nine
what useless, because it will appeal ony to those who
times out of ten a man's politics can be predicted from
already have altruistic desires. But to preach rationality
the way in which he makes his living. This has led some
people to maintain, and many more to believe practiis somewhat different. since rationality helps us to
realize our own desires on the whole, whatever they
cally. that in such matters it is impossible to be obmay be. A man is rational in proportion as his intellijective. and that no method is possible except a tuq=ofgence informs and controls his desires. I believe that the
war between classes with opposite bias
It is just in such cases, however. that psychocontrol of our acts by our intelligence is ultimately what
analysis is particularly useful, since it enables men to
is of most importance, and what alone will mi'l'kesocial
life remain possible as science increases the means at
become aware of a bias wrucn has rutherto been
our disposal for injuring each other. Education. the
unconscious. It gives a technique for seeing ourselves
press, politics, religion - in a word, all the great forces
as others see us. and a reason for supposing that this
in the world - are at present on the side of irrationality;
view of ourselves is less unjust than we are inclined to
they are in the hands of men who flatter King Demos in
think. Combined with a training in the scientific outlook.
order to lead him astray. The remedy does not lie in
this method could. if it were widely taught. enable
anything heroically cataclysmic, but in the efforts of
people to be infinitely more rational than they are at
individuals towards a more sane and balanced view of
present as regards all their beliefs about matters of fact.
our relations to our neighbours and to the world. It is to
and about the probable effect of any proposed action.
intelligence, increasingly widespread, that we must
And if men did not disagree about such matters, the
look for the solution of the ills from which our worlrl is
disagreements which might survive would almost cer. suffering.
. ~
tainty be found capable of amicable adjustment.
There remains. however, a residuum which cannot be
treated by purely intellectual methods. The desires of
From the American Atheist Bookstore ...
one man do not by any means harmonize completely
AN A THEIST'S BERTRAND RUSSELL
with those of another. Two competitors on the Stock
Exchange might be in complete agreement as to what
(Edited by Jon G_Murray)
would be the effect of this or that action, but this would
Six essays for "beginners", 50 pp. __... $3.29
not produce practical harmony. since each wishes to
-AM I AN ATHEIST OR AN AGNOSTIC?
grow rich at the expense of the other. Yet even here
rationality is capable of preventing most of the harm
Bertrand Russell
that might otherwise occur. We call a man irrational
32 pp
_ _ _._ __
__.. $3.00
when he acts in a passion, when he cuts off his nose to
P. O. Box 2111..Austi~, TX 78768
spite his face. He is irrational because he forgets that, by
--------------------
--------------------
Page 12
Fructidor
(September)
11981
American
Atheist
\
J
~
,
James E.Brodhead
This last phrase was the only one normally inflected. The
talk was not conversation but a cloud of sound much as a squid
squirts ink, keeping the enemy at bay, and it had the
hilariously artificial quality of novice actors in a bad highschool play, overemphasizing every word that seemed significant in the script - "SPIRitual", "BIBLE", "CHRIStian".
Amused, Dad and the boys retreated to the cooler parking lot
and lounged against their car, just outside the door. As the last
of the cones were being nibbled, Will, the 15-year-old,
gestured at the group inside. The adults had qathered their
children around them, passing paper napkins, speaking agitatedLy, glancing over their shoulders through the plate-glass
storefront. Will giggled.
Austin, Texas
Fructidor
(September)
11981
Page 13
ON OUR WAY
understood,
no twelve-year
old
would be of much help; not even after
being informed about every circumstance prevailing
during a given
period in the past. For instance, he
couldn't even give us more than an
inkling about the behavior of his
parents - why they at such and such
a time comported themselves as they
did.
The child is unequal to the task
because in his own short life he hasn't
dealt with circumstantial
pressures
such as his progenitors had to face
and overcome. The child is too young
to have found out that experience is
indispensable for an understanding
of life's whimsies. He can't know that
the raw cruelty of existence makes
anything tortured to death a dangerous subject of contemplation.
When
we consider that christian children
are told as early as at four and five
about the sufferings of Jesus, we can
understand why not even a child of
twelve (or an adult of like I.Q.)
realizes the beastly consequences to
his life of having been taught that a
cross hung with a replica
of a
tortured human cadaver is a sacred
object and a fit adjunct of worship.
So, what can we expect of people so
reared? Doesn't their training account for much that now perplexes
the globe?
Much like the ingenuous tot, the
run-of-the-mill preacher - more or
less insulated from worries such as
beset the average human - is experientially unqualified to advise people
how they should live. His stock in
trade is a patois of biblistic blabbings
and homilies. When a crisis threatens
his flock he props this platitudinous
outflow with the promise that the
faithful need have no fear because all
sufferi.ng (as said the pope during his
recent meanderings in Micronesia) is
a part of god's ineffable plan. Encouraging bloke.iisn"t he? Evangelism has
in recent days made a few temporary
gains. and disproportionately
profited by it for two reasons. First,
because religious belief requires minimum effort and promises to bring
back "the good old days" now forever
gone; and Second, because religion's
preachers assure their constituents
that their staunch trust - in their
"father god" together with regular
tithing - is all it takes to secure them
Austin, Texas
IV
Page 15
Fred Woodworth
liFE IN A THEOCRACY
To the wilds of Arizona and Utah came the religious zealots of
the late nineteenth century. Bands of Mormons, trundling their
possessions in covered wagons to the westernpart
of what is now
the United States, settled in the high mountain country away from
the prying eyes of the world, and formed clannish towns of large
families with deep-lying traits of pa riarchyand
suspicion of
outsiders. In isolation for decades, some of these communities
retained virtually complete religious purity through the nineteen
sixties, resisting contamination
by secular civilization's
books,
schools, or ideas. Here the will of the LDS Church ruled, through
the moral policeman, the censor, the propagandist,
and even the
night-raider, with the ranks of the faithful constantly swelled in
giant polygamous families where the word of the father was stern
Law.
.
Books and articles about the e Mormons usually stress their
self-reliance, their preparedness for emergency with stores offood,
and their retreat from religious intolerance in the rest of the
Christian world. But little is said of their own violent intolerance to
others or the authoritarian
nature of their church which, even in its
expressed concern with preparedness by its people, appears more
'preoccupied with insuring that it as an institution continues to
exist, than 'with acting out of humanitarianism,
Since the most often heard statement about the Mormons has to
do with their alleged rejection of religious intolerance, a glance at
this people-must linger first on its own treatment "of those who do
not belong to the LDS religion. And we should examine the
QUALITY of life.in the Mormon theocracy top, because without
freedom .c-individual
self-determination
- for all their stores of
food and busy activity they are no better than acolony of ants. As a
typical LDS community, let's visit the small town of Morrnonville,
in the mountains above Arizona's Mogollon Rim.just north of the
Fort" Apache Indian reservation.
Mormonville
in 1957 had a population
of about 850, nearly
every single one of whom was a member of the LDS Church. Every
teacher at the local school was a Mormon, .as were" all town
officials, policemen, bank officers, postal workers and even the
doctor. If-you wanted to buy a magazine, you bought it from the
Mormon who owned the newsstand, and if you needed gas for your
car, you made a trip to a Mormon-owned
service station. Now this
may not appear at first too surprising, but what makes such
unanimity somewhat odd in this instance is the fact that Mormonville lay squarely on a major transcontinental
highway, U.S. 60,
which in fact formed the main street of the town. Surrounded by
attractive Torest land, transfixed by a busy road that carried people
from every part of the country, Mormonville nonetheless kept its
sectarian character, and even by 1964, when the population had
grown to above 2,000, there were still only two or three nonMormon families in town.
One way the latter-day saints (this is what they call themselves)
discouraged outsiders was by stopping other religions from coming
in. When baptists attempted to build a hall on property they had
obtained just outside of town, in the late '50s, the construction site
was repeatedly visited by thieves and vandals, and some of the
original proponents of the church ended up leaving the region.
While the baptists did manage to complete their project eventually, .
it took them several years, and even when finished, the church had
to collect its congregation from farms and outposts scattered far
throughout the countryside.
.
Page 16
Fructidor
(September)
II
11981
. American
Atheist
NATURE'S WAY
'1
Electing candidates
in the U.S. has become, as the
expression goes, a real 'fun thing.' Certainly everyone will
agree that our political conventions, complete with hats,
horns and confetti, are some of the most gala extravaganzas
on Earth. Considering that these wild displays follow closely
on the heels of months of campaign theatrics, how can
anyone be~other than caught up in the carnival-like atmosphere of it all.
It therefore seems quite understandable that we generally
wind up selecting ex-movie actors or 'golden-throated'
orators rather than sober studious business persons. After
all - wouldn't it be a shame to waste all the 'B-movie' stage
presence offered up by the multitudes of office seeking
professional
smile makers?
Yes, I'm afraid
the
Jeffersonian image is dead! Serious politicking has gone the
way of all passing things.
Along with the phasing out of the electoral processes
several otherchanges might be noted. Candidates nowadays
are much more capable of delivering long-winded speeches
than were their earlier counterparts. It used to be that when
a senatorial hopeful had something to say, he'd come right
out with it. How unimaginative! Hell, I've heard Nixon talk
for hours and still not tip his hand as to what he really
intended. Perhaps it has become the anxious anticipation of
trying to grasp some idea of what candidates are talking
about that really stirs the voters' blood today. Or maybe
we're just intrigued in a childlike manner by the promise of
endless social 'goodies' during the days prior ry election.
And of course, a good old down and dirty mudslinging fest
has great appeal in more recent times. It's not at all like the
bygone days when a public slur or personal insult was likely
to initiate a duel of honor. No sir - we're too 'civilized' for
that now! Catcalling is the modern name of the game.
So, after the wild fever-pitched pace of the campaigning,
it seems only fitting that we should top it off with a weeklong convention party. The only problem with this new
'high-timing'
way of political life is that every party is
followed by its own 'morning after.' Six months after
election time, when the bleary-eyed voters begin to recover,
they always find that they've 'hung another one on.' Our
social hangovers are always the same: unemployment,
inflation,
dishonesty
in office, etc. Yet the promiseintoxicated mind of the gullible voter stands ever ready for
the next party: And so the ongoing saga of uninformed
voters stays with us. We are too easily fooled by the
'minstrels' who have infested our political system.
A case in point was called to my attention by my own dear
sister, Beverly Sims. Beverly is a very conscientious and
intelligent person, and I am indebted to her for sending me
two letter copies recently. Her evaluation of our misguided
political practices is masterful, and I would like to share with
you her appraisal of a particular 'political action committee.'
Austin, Texas
The first letter I shall call the 'apple pie patriotic pitch letter.
It goes as follows:
ALAMO POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE
Post Office Drawer 26547
Austin, Texas 78755
June 5, 1981
Dear Republican Official:
Senator Roger Staubach!
As an official of the Republican Party, you know
that Roger may be the only candidate who can win the
Senate race in Texas in 1982. He is known and
respected by Texans of both parties as a man devoted
to the preservation of the family, the restoration of
moral principles and the rebuilding of America's
military defenses.
Roger Staubach does not think that his name
recognition is a qualification for political office and
neither do I. I do think his character and his principles
mark him as a man who is qualified for public trust.
We are fortunate to have a man of his calibre who is
widely known and can be elected.
Upon his graduation from the U.S. Naval Academy,
Roger could have resigned his commission and started
playing immediately for the Dallas Cowboys. At high
personal cost he chose to honor his committment [sic]
to his country and served his full four years including a
year in war-torn Vietnam.
Roger knew his duty and he accepted it without
complaint or reluctance.
Some people feel that Roger will not seek the
Republican nomination for the Senate from Texas, I
know though that if you and I demonstrate the true
strength of the respect and admiration Texans have for
Roger as a man of principle and conviction, he will
again accept his call to duty. Roger Staubach in the
United States Senate! We can make it happen!
The Staubach campaign will be the most interesting
and closely watched race in the nation in 1982. Our
candidate will hold high the flag of limited government, economic sanity, strong national defense and
the conservative principles you and I share.
Roger Staubach will run if you and I do what is
required of us. All that is necessary is to give our fellow
Texans a chance to voice their support. Texans know
Roger Staubach as a leader, as a man and as a
concerned citizen. Now is the time for Alamo PAC's
Draft Staubach Committee to show Roger how strong
his support is and the deep committment [sic] Texans
1,1
Page 17
Fructidor
(September)
COINS
Three coins in the fountain Which one will the fountain bless?
Empty words of the mystic fool
Bound by his idleness
Better the sparkling fountain's flow
Would quench the thirsty fool
Who throws the price of a poor man's bread
On the floor of this lavish pool
Tempting coins in the shallows lie
Making soulful eyes to stare Dare an ingrate reach for that precious gold
To pay for his daily fare?
Oh greed is a strange and thoughtless thing
So we'll punish the wretched thief
Who'd steal the fee for a rich man's prayer
To spare his tragic grief
You
Sometimes it seems so very hard
Remembering numerous little things now passed,
And years just hasten by - like winter's shortest day
whose fading light, I'm sure - will come too fast
And while some lesser things I can't recall,
Could I forget an everlasting rose
That mirrors beauty every day - for me
Until these happy eyes of mine shall close
So in this short yet very pleasant life
This single thing of beauty stands apart
You - have etched my memory most of all
And carved your name upon my heart
Gerald Tholen
11981
American
Atheist
D. L. Kent
BENEFIT OF CLERGY
One 01 the basic tJetlL'lenCle~ 01 an) rehgrun I~ that It
claims special status for its adherents.
When this claim to be
"chosen."
"called."
or "born-again"
becomes politicized.
it
doesn't take a Jeffersonian
Democrat
to realize that such
intolerant
absurdities
as zionism are on their way. At best.
this Holier Than
I h o u aspect of religion
introduces
yet
another divisive element into society: at worst. it provides or
leads to a hypocritical
facade behind which a continuing
assault can he made on the democratic
provisions 'of the
Constitution.
The extent
of the mischief
and hypocrisy
brought
into society bv religion can be well illustrated
by a
brief historical
survey of the doctrine of Benefit of Clergy.
This doctrine
was an amelioration
of the rigor of the
criminal law introduced
and for some centuries practiced
in
England.
and which became part of the law of the English
colonies.
Benefit of Clergy was a by-prod uct of the conflict between
the church and the secular authorities
during the Middle
Ages. The popes sought to withdraw
the clergy altogether
from secula r control. They claimed to rule by divine right. to
which all kings must submit.
They rested this claim to
immunity
from the secular authority
on the words of the
scripture:
./VOIiI'
tangere meos Christos. touch not my
anointed.
do no harm to my prophets.
words which had no
particular
reference to the priesthood.
On the Continent
the
states freel) complied
with the pretensions
of the popes.
either a~ a pious act or in dread of the future pains to result
from excommunication.
In England
the claims met with
some rcsista ncc. In cases of high treason
.. treason to the
king or his immediate
family
they were always resisted.
From time to time certain other crimes were excepted from
Benefit of Clergy. One of the first of these was horsestealing. by statute of Edward VI.
Before the Norman
Conquest
and for several centuries
thereafter.
the clergy took an active part in the legislative
and judicial branches
of the government.
By far the largest
part of the educated
class belonged
to that profession.
Bishops attended
courts of law and instructed
the judges as
to the limits of the canonical
and secular jurisdictions.
There
was always a controversy
about this and when HenryIl l
sought to bring churchmen
into the secular courts for trial
and punishment.
Boniface (successor to Thomas a Becket as
archbishop
ofCanterbur
y) ordered churchmen
to ignore the
kings summons and pronounced
excommunication
against
all persons
Violating
t hr canonical
law while enforcing
secular process. Thus the king\ effort to recover jurisdiction
over clerics failed.
In the Merchant and Friar. Sir Francis Palgrave gives this
picture of a trial. A thief had been apprehended
in Chepc in
the very act of cutting the purse of a vicar-general
and was
condemned
to be hanged. Louder and louder came the cries
of the culprit as the sergeants dragged him away. Heclung to
Fructidor
Austin. Texas
rJ
King Lear:
Madam.
I hope your grace will stand
Between me and my neck-verse
if I be
Called in question
for opening the King's
The British Apollo (1710) has this:
(September)
11981
letter.
Page 19
Page 20
Fructidor
DIAL AN ATHEIST
CHAPTERS
OF AMERICAN
Phoenix, Arizona
:
Tucson, Arizona
Los Angeles, California
Sacramento, California
San Diego, California
San Francisco, California
Denver, Colorado
Atlanta, Georgia
Chicago, Illinois
Marshalltown, Iowa
Lexington, Kentucky
"
Boston, Massachusetts
Detroit, Michigan
St. Louis, Missouri
Metuchen, New Jersey
Albuquerque, New Mexico
New York, New York
Schenectady, New York
Charlotte, North Carolina
Akron, Ohio
Portland, Oregon
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
Providence, Rhode Island
Galveston, Texas
Houston, Texas
Salt Lake City, Utah
Alexandria, Virginia
Richmond, Virginia
. Milwaukee, Wisconsin
(September)
11981
ATHEISTS
(602) 899-7411
(602) 623-3861
(213) 460-4326
(916) 989-3170
(714) 232-6767
(415) 474-5'225
(303) 692-9395
(404) 329-9809
(312) 335-4648
(515) 753-7522
(606) 278-8333
(617) 344-2988 '
(313):721-6630
(314) 771-8894
(201) 777-0766
(505) 884-7630
(212) 726-3647
(518) 346-1479
(704) 568-5346
(216) 666-3990
(503) 287-6461
(412) 734-0509
(617) 344-2988
(713) 935-4721
(713) 367-0574
(801) 364-4939
(703) 370-5255
(804) 359-4043
(414) 442-9786
American
Atheist
IV
Austin. Texas
Fructidor
'steal a march' on his competitor for financial advantage. What about the theft of ideas?
Some acts are ethically and morally wrong but legally
right. There are many acts condemned by law which
possess inherent moral and ethical value.
At one time legal permission and license was granted
to commit robbery on the high seas. Did that change the
immoral nature of the act? Pocket-picking is a recognized and highly unionized profession in Egypt. When
King Farouk was married, the King of Thieves issued a
proclamation in the newspapers stating that, as a
friendly gesture to the other king, he would call off all his
thieves during the nuptial celebrations. In consequence,
not a pocket was picked.
How are we to judge those acts which at one time
were legal and at another time illegal?
Under the legal banner and sanction of "caveat
emptor" (let the buyer beware) trades people misbranded and labeled falsely. False weights, false pretenses of all kinds were considered ordinary instruments of commerce. Just listen to television advertising
today!
Often the religious community says that the conscience of a person must be the guide. But few thieves
have a "stricken conscience." Even if it wer~ true that a
stricken conscience would afflict those who steal from
others, how would that recompense the victim? A
stricken conscience would merely be punishment for
the culprit. but the victim would continue to suffer the
loss of his possessions.
Mr. Lewis comes up with a remedy which I have now
seen proposed by every Atheist who has ever broached
the subject. That is that the thief must be made to satisfy
and recompense for the [oss. In addition more adequate
standards must be abroad in the land. Bernard Shaw
said, "We must make the world honest before we can
honestly say to our children that 'honesty is the best
policy."
Again, quoting Robert Ingersoll, the great American
Atheist of the last century, Mr. Lewis points out that he
had the following to say on this issue:
"As long as dishonorable success outranks
honest effort, as long as society bows and cringes
before big thieves, there will be little ones enough
to fill the jails."
In the Atheist viewpoint, honesty for honesty's sake is
the highest ethical conduct. We care little. whether this
has to do with "thou shalt not steal" or with any
business or personal transaction. If a person's word is
(September)
11981
Page 21
~/
Page 22
Fructidor
(September)
1.1
11981
American
Atheist
continued
from page 16
Austin, Texas
Fructidor
Ham, were cursed with what we call negroid racial characteristics. The Book of Mormon explains why the Lamanites
received dark skins and a degenerate status." (p. 554)
In Mormonville
these ideas were believed with self-righteous
intensity. and no black man, woman or child lived there, worked
there. or went to school there. You found no exchange student
from Ghana, and you certainly found no Mormon family whose
son had married a black man's sister. No debate of these ideas was
permitted. and even if debate had somehow occurred, no reportage
of it would have appeared in the local newspaper, which was
Mormon-owned,
or on the local radio station, which was soon
profoundly intimidated by Mormons, to the point that it often ran
five-hour Mormon "conferences" in the middle of the day, to the
exclusion of other programing.
Even fiction was scrutinized to
some degree. and in the public library a Sherlock
Holmes
anthology containing
the story, "A Study in Scarlet", which
portrays Mormons very negatively, had the offending pages torn
out.
This. then, was life in a theocracy - distant from the centers of
enlightening cosmopolitan civilization, swayed by the ignorance of
authorities, teachers and citizenry. In a theocracy the "holy book"
rules, no matter what its absurdities, and almost at every turn the
ordinary person is subjected to controls over his behavior and
attitudes. The ideals of freedom that lift human society, in some
times and places. somewhat out of the mire of bigotry. arbitrary
rule, inequality of treatment, censorship. and religious statism. are
neglected and forgotten.
Throughout the world the voice of theocracy is again beginning
to be heard. In Iran. a religious regime cuts off the hands of"
political enemies, which means almost anyone; executes schoolgirls,
,'<.
hounds and harasses women to force them back to a subservient
position. And to what purpose is society thus disrupted? A "moral
code" spelled out by a "holy book".
In Italy the catholic pope attempts to maneuver. the introduction
of laws that enforce Romanism. In Mexico, Brazil and the rest of
Latin America, catholic culture has forcefully tied itself to
imperialism through the Spanish language, and imposes through
law the arrogant
proclamations
emanating
from the Vatican.
Again a "holy book", interpreted by opinionated authoritarians,
enchains the life of human beings.
In Utah the Mormons' theocracy is practically undiminished,
and a variant wave based on yet another "holy book" washes over
the rest of the country, drowning principles of individual freedom,
inthe form of fundamentalist christians' ravings and frenzied work
to halt sexual freedom and ownership of one's own body. Although
it seems incredible that the progress of recent decades could be
wiped out, the history of mankind has after all been one of
prevailing illiberal regimes, while the freedom to think and
question authority, to doubt religious certainty and to scoff at the
absurdities of "holy books" is barely seconds old.
A peek at the future wanted by authoritarian
religionists reveals
a horrifying picture of the small-town mentality expanded to the
scale of an entire culture. Repressive politics, control of life
through economic, social and juridical sanctions, combine with
overthrow of the real purpose of education to subvert creativity
and independent
thought to the yoke of rote-learning and obedience. Patriarchy, authoritarianism,
enforced moralism, censor-
(September)
11981
Page 23
floMlw
-=-----=-------
Angeline Bennett
J
WOMAN
PROGRESS
EDITORIAL
Primitives in ignorance
Drank the blood of animals
They revered as gods.
Today their actions are aped.
CLASSIFIED ADVERTISING
NOTICE
Amateur radio operators who are interested in starting a
nationwide American Atheist Amateur Radio Network
should contact Jeff Levine, W A2AQC, 30 Sherman Street.
Passaic, NJ 07055. They should have 20-15-10 meter
capability.
Page 24'
Fructidor
------
(September)
11981
Atheist
IV
THEISM IS WORSE
THAN ILLOGICAL j
61ClRPT5
ATHEISM"
11