Leverage Shakes Up Mutual Funds, Which Discover a Strategy's Downside - WSJ.

com

Page 1 of 3

Dow Jones Reprints: This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use only. To order presentation-ready copies for distribution to your colleagues, clients or customers, use the Order Reprints tool at
the bottom of any article or visit www.djreprints.com
See a sample reprint in PDF format.

BUSINESS

Order a reprint of this article now

JANUARY 24, 2009

Leverage Shakes Up Mutual Funds, Which Discover a Strategy's Downside

By SHEFALI ANAND

In recent years, more mutual funds have used borrowed money to juice returns and lure investors. Now, they are discovering the
downside of leverage, and some are cutting back.
Early last year, Wall Street was heavily promoting several new types of funds that rely on borrowing money. These include so-called
130/30 funds that aim to amplify market returns by betting against some stocks, as well as "leveraged index" funds, which promise to
double the return of a market index or double its inverse.
At the same time, closed-end funds, many of which have used leverage for decades, were growing rapidly until 2007.

Two Sides to Leverage

While borrowing money can improve returns in good times, it also
widens losses in bad times, and that is what happened in 2008. Some of these funds ended the year with even greater losses than the
market as a whole. For instance, of the 15 mutual funds that apply the 130/30 strategy for U.S. stocks, only a third beat the Standard &
Poor's 500-stock index in 2008, according to Morningstar Inc. Some of the laggards fell behind the index by five percentage points.
"By definition, leverage can work for you and it can work against you," says Michael Sapir, chairman of ProFund Advisors LLC, the
largest provider of leveraged index funds. His leveraged funds were among the worst- and best-performing stock funds last year.
The tiny Mobile Telecommunications UltraSector ProFund fund, which aims to provide 150% of the daily returns of the Dow Jones
U.S. Mobile Telecommunications Index, fell 90% last year. The fund has only $1 million in assets currently.
Meanwhile, an exchange-traded fund that doubles down against semiconductor stocks, ProShares UltraShort Semiconductors, was the
best performer last year with its 106% return, according to Lipper Inc.
Even some traditional mutual funds that use leverage opportunistically have been hurt. The $1.5 billion Baron Partners Fund, which
uses bank borrowing to increase its stock bets, fell 46.7% in 2008, nearly 10 points worse than the S&P 500's total return. Fund
manager Ron Baron declined to comment. In a recent shareholder note, Mr. Baron said he believes that the companies his funds'
invest in will "recover their value over the next several years."
Of course, leverage has shaken up a lot more than the fund industry. Excess leverage on Wall Street is a big reason for last year's
market meltdown. A number of hedge funds, which had borrowed heavily to turn a mound of equity into a mountain of assets, were

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123276245590712349.html

1/24/2009

Leverage Shakes Up Mutual Funds, Which Discover a Strategy's Downside - WSJ.com

Page 2 of 3

forced to sell their positions to meet demands from creditors. This

depressed various stock, bond and commodity markets.
Under federal law, mutual funds can't take on debt of more than a
third of their assets. If markets decline and assets fall, funds have
to reduce their borrowing to stay within the limit. The $200 billion
closed-end fund industry was forced to do just that last year, as
markets fell sharply for two months after mid-September.
Given these troubles, analysts don't expect all funds using leverage
to survive.
"There's going to be a move toward simplicity after this market
downturn," says John Rekenthaler, vice president of research at
Morningstar. He thinks the 130/30 funds are going to struggle to
grow from here on.
"It's a new type of fund, with fairly aggressive promises,
complicated strategy, and they didn't perform well in the bear
market," Mr. Rekenthaler says. " ... To me, that all spells investors
and advisers saying, 'What's the point?' "
How do 130/30 funds work? For every $100 invested, the fund
will borrow stocks valued at $30 to sell "short" and invest this cash
raised in the market, thus making the gross investment equal to
$130.
Paul Quinsee, who heads the team managing the largest 130/30 mutual fund, JPMorgan U.S. Large Cap Core Plus fund, expects the
investing strategy to survive. His fund dropped about two points less than the S&P 500's total return last year, making it among the
best performers amid such funds.
Mr. Quinsee says the fund managers cut back on the amount of leverage in the fund, bringing it to less than 120/20. He declined to
specify the funds' short positions but said his fund did what it's supposed to do.
Some other 130/30 funds didn't fare as well. Funds that lagged behind the overall market included the Old Mutual Analytic U.S.
Long/Short fund, the Dreyfus 130/30 Growth fund, RiverSource 120/20 Contrarian Equity Fund and the UBS U.S. Equity Alpha
mutual fund.
Scott Bondurant, co-manager of the UBS mutual fund, said his fund was hurt particularly after September, as panicked investors
dumped some of the stocks owned by the fund to gravitate toward stocks of companies perceived to be safe during a recession.
Currently, its strategy is down to 125/25.
Managers of the other funds declined to comment.
The biggest users of leverage are closed-end funds, versions of mutual funds that trade like a stock. About 72% of the 600-odd funds
use leverage, according to Cecilia Gondor of Thomas Herzfeld Advisors Inc. They borrow money at lower, short-term rates and invest
it in securities that they expect will earn them higher returns.

Under Pressure

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123276245590712349.html

1/24/2009

Leverage Shakes Up Mutual Funds, Which Discover a Strategy's Downside - WSJ.com

Page 3 of 3

However, this strategy came under pressure early last year, as their main route for borrowing, auction-rate securities, froze up. Since
then, the closed-end funds have been paying higher rates on their borrowing.
Later in the year, as net asset values declined, several funds had to deleverage or get rid of borrowing entirely to meet legal
requirements. Closed-end funds are required by law to maintain $3 of assets for every $1 borrowed as debt, and $2 for every $1 issued
as preferred shares.
The Dreman/Claymore Dividend & Income Fund redeemed more than $300 million, or 71%, of its auction-rate preferred shares last
year to stay in line with legal requirements.
The Putnam Municipal Opportunities Trust fund had $394 million of leverage through auction-rate preferreds in early 2008, but in
the fall its board announced its merger with an open-end fund to address the high cost of leverage. Since that announcement, the fund
has eliminated leverage of at least $116 million.
Write to Shefali Anand at shefali.anand@wsj.com

Copyright 2008 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved
This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use only. Distribution and use of this material are governed by our Subscriber Agreement and by copyright law. For non-persona
use or to order multiple copies, please contact Dow Jones Reprints at 1-800-843-0008 or visit
www.djreprints.com

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123276245590712349.html

1/24/2009