Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
The Lǎozǐ 老子or Dàodéjīng 道德經 is a Chinese text whose origin, authorship,
and interpretation continue to remain difficult for us to ascertain even today. These items
of contention can become even more difficult for us in our understanding due to
differences in culture, as well as, being further obscured by the two millennia that have
passed in which we can trace its existence. In the past 100 years, there has been an
explosion of translations of the Dàodéjīng in the English speaking West. There seems to
be some irony that a text that claims itself to be “easy to understand” is being retranslated
with greater and greater frequency. In this cultural appropriation through the translation
of this text, translators may have innocently, or not so innocently, colored their
translation with their own cultural views and agendas. For this article, I will look at The
Way of Life – Lao Tzu: A New Translation of the Tao Té Ching by R.B. Blakney and
show what I believe to be some erroneous assumptions and problems of translation that
missionary and teacher in China, and author of many volumes on Oriental religions…
[He] studied the book for thirty years and obviously lived according to its teachings”
(Blakney, 1). In his preface, Blakney explains his reasoning for making this translation:
For one reason or another each translation, in its turn, fails fully to
satisfy one who knows the original, and at length, one tries his own
hand at it. Will he, in his turn, satisfy? Probably not; but he may add
his share to the ultimate understanding of one of the world’s truly
distinguished religious works (Blakney, 9).
By this logic, everyone who ever knew the original should make a translation of the text,
which would, taken altogether, lead to the best understanding of it. The addition of more
translations means the addition of more material to sift through before one can arrive at
Page 1 of 11
CHI394: The Daoist Bible Final Essay Norman Trent Newell, Jr.
Professor Bokenkamp 12/16/2009
“ultimate understanding” of the text, a sort of Zeno’s race paradox, if you will. One
could never reach an “ultimate understanding” because there would always be another
In his introduction, Blakney claims “the Chinese mystics were original and to the
point in their writing, but their point was identical with that of the great mystics
elsewhere” (Blakney, 9). Blakney, throughout, tends to lump all mysticism together as
one mysticism:
We have also seen that much of what is reported in the Tao Tê Ching is
parallel to the discoveries of mystics elsewhere in the world. The way
might well be Brahman’s brother… What these mystics found turned
out to be as true in one country as another and as trustworthy a guide to
the spiritual world today as then… Their natures were not unique; nor
did the problem of evil as they met it differ essentially from that of
other lands (Blakney, 42).
I follow with Benjamin Schwartz in his assessment of mysticism not being the same
everywhere and being related to the context in which it is found. Schwartz counters:
and with:
There is nothing which suggests the exaltation of mystic gnosis … and it may
well be that in this case Taoism is not so much a deep mysticism as a kind of
‘life attitude’ willing to submit to all the ways of the tao immanent in man and
nature without probing further into the deeper mysteries of being and obviously
without the aesthetic élan of a Chuang-tzu (Schwartz, 242-43).
view reality as two worlds: this worldly and other worldly. A commonly held belief is
that when we are alive we live in ‘this world’ and, when we die, we pass into the ‘other
world’. Chinese mysticism is only “this worldly”. There is no next world to go on to.
Page 2 of 11
CHI394: The Daoist Bible Final Essay Norman Trent Newell, Jr.
Professor Bokenkamp 12/16/2009
For the ancient Chinese, “There is no ‘other world’ of supernatural beings which is
comparable to but radically different than the mundane one…The Chinese spirits were
simply human beings, dead ones, who continued to require nurture and to exercise power
over their descendants, but they made no moral demands and did not exercise any moral
I have selected Chapters 13, 16 and 22 from Blakney to compare with D.C. Lau’s
translation as well as the standard Chinese text received from Wángbì 王弼 (226-249
C.E.). The complete texts are laid out side by side on pages 7 through 9 of this paper.
They have been numbered for ease of reference and words are highlighted to draw
paraphrased each chapter at the bottom of his translation and I have included this on page
Chapter 13 discusses the troubles brought on by social recognition and how one
who doesn’t value these is worthy of being the ruler. In lines 2, 5 and 6 on page 7,
Blakney chooses to translate shēn 身 as “self” whereas Lau chooses “body”. Blakney
does an interesting twist with this in line 6: “I suffer most because of me and selfishness.
If I were selfless, then what suffering would I bear?” Lau translates it as: “The reason I
have great trouble is that I have a body. When I no longer have a body what trouble have
I?” Lau’s interpretation might give a Christian reader some problems in that once you
are dead, you aren’t trouble free yet. A person has to face judgment. This may be why
Blakney steers clear of saying one is trouble free when one is free from one’s body.
Instead it’s replaced with a lesson on selflessness and selfishness. In line 8, Blakney
chooses to interpret ài 愛 as “love” and seems to twist the Chinese to say “Who loves all
Page 3 of 11
CHI394: The Daoist Bible Final Essay Norman Trent Newell, Jr.
Professor Bokenkamp 12/16/2009
people as he loves himself”. Ài has this meaning but it can also mean “to grudge”. Line
no “people” rénmín 人民 in this line. Thus, I believe Blakney is reading some of his
Chapter 16 describes a specific meditative practice that allows one to return to the
root. By returning to the root, a set of events will unfold that leads a person to naturally
obtain the “way”. In line 2 on page 8, Blakney has translated zuò 作 as “work”. I would
argue that not all things work for the benefit of each other in nature, which is a rather
utopian vision. Lau has translated it as “rise”, which is more fitting in reflecting growing
things that rise up and fits with the observance later that things decline again thereby
“returning to their root”. In lines 6 and 7, he has chosen to translate mìng 命 as “the will
Christianity. Blakney may have been avoiding this by using a more acceptable term.
This is in conflict with the Daoist Chinese worldview in which the Dao supersedes the
world of Heaven, Earth and Man as presented in lines 11 to 15. In the Christian
paradigm, God, is the ultimate source. Nothing prefaces Him. In lines 9 and 10, Blakney
seems to throw in some ‘fire and brimstone’ by translating those lines as “That not to
know it is blindness that works evil” (Blakney, 68). Lau translates these lines as “Not to
know the normal is to be without basis. To innovate without basis bodes ill” (Lau, 64).
Wàng 妄 has the meanings of “conduct that is not correct”, “careless” and “absurd”.
“crop harvest failure”, “savage, ferocious”, “a murderer” and “dread.” Literally, lines 9
and 10 would read “not knowing the normal or the constant, [is like] ‘conduct that is not
Page 4 of 11
CHI394: The Daoist Bible Final Essay Norman Trent Newell, Jr.
Professor Bokenkamp 12/16/2009
stretch. In the progression of lines 11 to 16, Blakney subtly twists the words to make the
divine (God to Blakney) seem like the end rather than the Dao. Lines 15 and 16 illustrate
this clearly: “And divinity is the Way Which is final.” This is reminiscent of John 14:6:
“Jesus answered, ‘I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father
except through me.” Blakney leaves out the “Way” in line 16, seeming to change the
meaning here. Lau maintains consistent wording in the progression giving us “Heaven
[leads] to the way, The way to perpetuity”. Here, Lau maintains the idea that the Dao
supersedes Heaven where Blakney blurs the edges of that idea. Line 17 for Blakney also
seems to echo the idea of John 3:16: “For God so loved the world that he gave his one
and only Son, that whoever believes in him shall not perish but have eternal life.”
Whereas in Lau’s rendering, if one “returns to the root”, one will attain the way which
leads to not having danger occur to one’s person to the very end of their allotment of life.
Mò 沒 has the meaning of “sinking”, “to the end” and “to die”. The passage works with
both translations, yet Blakney, in my mind, has chosen a more Christian sounding phrase.
Beatitudes from the Bible: “Blessed are the poor in spirit, for theirs is the kingdom of
heaven. Blessed are those who mourn for they will be comforted. Blessed are the meek,
for they will inherit the earth…” (Matthew 5:3-10). Compare with lines 1 to 6 on page 9:
“The crooked shall be made straight And the rough place plain; The pools shall be filled
And the worn renewed; The needy shall receive And the rich shall be perplexed”
Page 5 of 11
CHI394: The Daoist Bible Final Essay Norman Trent Newell, Jr.
Professor Bokenkamp 12/16/2009
(Blakney, 74). Blakney has also interpreted shào 少and duō 多as “needy” and “rich”
respectively, whereas, Lau has translated them more literally as “a little” and “a lot”.
My purpose in looking at Blakney’s text of the Dàodéjīng has been to point out
the subtle additions that as human beings we make when we receive information and
make it our own. Translators don’t always keep the text within the context of its origin,
but knowingly or unknowingly add something of themselves to the work. A text that
most likely arose to be a text of statescraft, has been claimed not just by Daoists as their
own, but by Confucianists, Buddhists, and Christians as well as many others. Blakney’s
translation is no better or worse than most. He seems to be simply one who is looking for
Page 6 of 11
CHI394: The Daoist Bible Final Essay Norman Trent Newell, Jr.
Professor Bokenkamp 12/16/2009
7
Hence he who values putting 若可託天下。 7
In governing the world,
his person in order can be given Let rule entrusted be
the custody of the empire. To him who treats his rank
8
He who grudges using his As if itwere his soul;
8
person for putting the empire in World sovereignty can be
order can be entrusted with the Committed to that man
empire. Who loves all people
As he loves himself.
Page 7 of 11
CHI394: The Daoist Bible Final Essay Norman Trent Newell, Jr.
Professor Bokenkamp 12/16/2009
2
I keep to extreme stillness. All things work together:
2 3
The myriad creatures all rise 致虛極守靜篤。
1 I have watched them reverting,
4
together And have seen how they
3
And I watch thereby their 萬物並作,
2
flourish
return. And return again, each to his
4
The teaming creatures
吾以觀復。
3
roots.
All return to their separate 夫物芸芸各復歸其
4
5
roots. This, I say, is the stillness:
5
Returning to one's roots is
根。 A retreat to one's roots;
known as stillness. 歸根曰靜,
5 6
Or better yet, return
6
Stillness is what is called To the will of God,
returning to one's destiny.
是謂復命;
6
7
Which is, I say, to constancy.
7
Returning to one's destiny is 復命曰常,
7 8
The knowledge of constancy
normal. I call enlightenment and say
8
Knowledge of the normal is
知常曰明。
8
9
That not to know it
discernment. 不知常,
9 10
Is blindness that works evil.
9
Not to know the normal is to be 妄作凶。
10
11
But when you know
without basis.
10
知常容,
11 What eternally is so,
To innovate without basis You have stature
bodes ill. 容乃公,
12
12
And stature means
11
To know the normal is to be 公乃王,
13 righteousness
13
tolerant. And righteousness is kingly
12
Tolerance leads to 王乃天,
14
14
And kingliness divine
impartiality,
13
天乃道,
15 15
16
And divinity is the Way
Impartiality to kingliness, Which is final.
14
Kingliness to heaven, 道乃久,
16
15
16
Heaven to the way, 沒身不殆。
17 17
Then, though you die,
The way to perpetuity, You shall not perish.
17
And to the end of one's days
one will meet with no danger.
16 (R.B. Blakney)
1
Touch ultimate emptiness,
Hold steady and still.
16 (Wángbì 王弼)
Page 8 of 11
CHI394: The Daoist Bible Final Essay Norman Trent Newell, Jr.
Professor Bokenkamp 12/16/2009
1
67 [22] (D.C. Lau) The crooked shall be made
22 (Wángbì 王弼) straight
1 2
Bowed down then whole; And the rough places plain;
2 3
Warped then true; 曲則全,
1 The pools shall be filled
3 4
Hollow then full; And the worn renewed;
4
Worn then new; 枉則直,
2 5
The needy shall receive
5 6
A little then benefited; And the rich shall be
6
A lot then perplexed.
窪則盈,
3
perplexed.
敝則新
4
7 7
Hence the sage grasps the One So the Wise Man cherishes the
8
and is the shepherd of the
少則得,
5
One,
empire. 多則惑。
6 8
As a standard to the world:
9
Not displaying himself,
9
He does not display himself,
是以聖人抱一,
7
He is famous;
and so is conspicuous;
10
為天下式。
8 10
Not asserting himself,
He does not show himself, and He is distinguished;
so is manifest; 不自見故明;
9
11
Not boasting his powers,
11
He does not boast of himself, 不自是故彰;
10
He is effective;
12
and so has merit; Taking no pride in himself,
12
He does not brag about it, and 不自伐故有功;
11
He is chief.
so is able to endure. 不自矜故長;
12
13
Because he is no competitor,
13
It is because he does not 夫唯不爭,
13
No one in all the world
contend that no one is in a 故天下莫能與之爭。 can compete with him.
position to contend with him.
古之所謂:
14
14
The saying of the men of old
14
The way the ancients had it, 「曲則全者」 Is not in vain:
'Whole through being bowed "The crooked shall be made
down', is a true saying as can 豈虛言哉! straight-"
be. 誠全而歸之。 To be perfect, return to it.
22 (R.B. Blakney)
Page 9 of 11
CHI394: The Daoist Bible Final Essay Norman Trent Newell, Jr.
Professor Bokenkamp 12/16/2009
13
“If high rank comes to one or leaves him, he will suffer for the egotism involved.
Only those to whom high rank is a great trust and who love people are fit for
government” (Blakney, 65).
16
“Deep in all there is a stillness, where the root of life is, and the root is God, from
whom destiny proceeds, and without knowledge of that root, the eternal root, a man is
blind and will therefore work evil. Let the king take note.
When he knows that root, he will be of great stature as a man and king whose
righteousness endows him with kingliness and makes him at last divine because the Way
is at work in him. Thus, the king may die but he will not perish” (Blakney, 68).
22
“In words suggestive of the Hebrew prophets, the writer says that the Way, like
Jahweh, is the restorer and mender of inequities. This thought should prove attractive to
the ruler of distressed people.
Let the king therefore embrace the One, the Way, by his own quietness (inaction),
and then, through him, the Way will take care of the needs of all.
Comment: This poem indicates that civilized society is contemplated as a result
of the Way’s virtue. The king would still be king and the wrongs of society righted”
(Blakney, 74).
Works Cited
Page 10 of 11
CHI394: The Daoist Bible Final Essay Norman Trent Newell, Jr.
Professor Bokenkamp 12/16/2009
Allan, Sarah. The Way of Water and Sprouts of Virtue. Albany: State University of New
York Press, 1997.
Blakney, Raymond B. The Way of Life Lao Tzu: A new translation of the Tao Te Ching.
New York, New York: Mentor, 1955.
International Bible Society. The Holy bible, New International Version. Grand Rapids,
Michigan: The Zondervan Corporation, 1984.
Lau, D.C. “Lao-Tzu Tao Te Ching: Translation of the Ma Wang Tui Manuscripts.” Ed.
Sarah Allan. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1994.
Page 11 of 11