Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
First, there are almost always hidden premises that we need to identify. For
instance: Kangaroos feed their cubs with milk, so theyre mammals. Whats
missing? Of course, a hidden premise: All animals that feed their cubs with milk are
mammals.
Second, theres a lot of words we can discard. Lets take this example from Sherlock
Holmes: A dog was kept in the stables, and yet, though someone has been in and
fetched out a horse, the dog had not barked. Obviously, the visitor was someone
whom the dog knew well. In order to look at the argument better, we need to get
rid of some words. Its like Michelangelo, who said that sculpting David was easy.
You just chip away the stone that doesnt look like David. If we do the same, were
left with the conclusion The visitor was not a stranger. and the premise The dog
did not bark. Of course, we now see the need for a hidden premise, namely (pause)
you guessed: Dogs bark at strangers. What Ive done is take away a lot of words
and paraphrasing others. But you need to do that carefully!
Third: An argument can have more than two premises. For instance, if we were to
be more catholic than the Pope, the museum argument should look like this:
The Village Museum is a museum. Museums are closed on Monday. Today is Monday.
Therefore the Village Museum is closed today.
Forth: sometimes there are special words that indicate the conclusion. What would
those be? So, therefore, thus, and so on. They are called conclusion markers.
Also, sometimes we can identify premises by special words like because or for,
which are called premise markers. But in every day communication, these markers
sometimes are just not there.
Lets recap:
In real life: