Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
ABSTRACT: Corrugated web girders represent a new structural system emerged in the past two decades. The
girders flanges provide the flexural strength of the girder with no contribution from the corrugated web
which provides the girders shear capacity. Failure of the web occurs by steel yielding, web buckling or interactively between them. Lateral torsion and local flange buckling of corrugated web girders represent another
two possible failure criteria. Here, the work previously performed by the author on corrugated web girders
was compiled and presented in a comprehensive format. The starting point is the shear behaviour of the corrugated webs which is investigated focusing on the failure modes affecting the web design. An interaction
equation that considers web buckling and yielding is proposed. Numerical analyses are performed to investigate the buckling modes of the corrugated web, verify the validity of the proposed equation and explore the
post-buckling strength of corrugated web girders. The numerical model is extended to determine the critical
moment causing lateral instability for corrugated web girders. The applicability of the critical moment design
equations, currently used for plane web girders, to corrugated web girders is examined. The numerical model
is then used to scrutinize the local buckling behaviour of the compression flange. The applicability of the currently used limiting values for the flange outstand-to-thickness ratios to corrugated web girders is investigated.
1 INTRODUCTION
Corrugated steel webs were recently used to replace
the stiffened steel webs of plate/box girders (Cheyrezy & Combault 1990, Combault et al. 1993, Reinhard 1994, Lebon 1998, Combault 1988, SayedAhmed 2001, 2003c, 2005c). The commonly used
corrugation profile for corrugated web plates is the
trapezoidal profile (Fig. 1).
The flexural strength of a steel girder with a corrugated web plate is provided by the flanges with
almost no contribution from the web and with no interaction between flexure and shear behaviour. The
corrugated steel web solely provides the shear capacity of the girders where the shear strength is controlled by buckling and/or steel yielding of the web.
The flanges provide boundary supports for the web
which lie somewhere between a simply supported
boundary and a clamped one (Luo & Edlund 1994,
Elgaaly et al. 1996, Johnson & Cafolla 1997a, Yoda
et al. 1994).
Failure of a corrugated steel web plate occurs by
the classical steel yielding of the web under a pure
shear stress state. It may also occur by web buckling
due to either local instability of any panel between
two folds or overall instability of the web over two
a
b
y
d
c = 2 (b + d)
s = 2 (b + d / cos )
h= d tan
= a/b
hw
Horizontal panel
Inclined panel
Figure 1. Trapezoidal profile of the corrugated web plates.
27
y =
Fy
(1)
2 E
t
w
2
12 ( 1 ) b
b
k s = 5.34 + 4.0
hw
(2)
(3)
D x3
hw2
1/ 4
(4)
tw
c Et
D y =
s 12
3
w
b+d
Et
=
b + d / cos 12
3
w
cr ,in ,l = 0.8 cr ,l y
where cr ,in ,l y
cr ,in , g = 0.8 cr , g y
where cr ,in , g y
cr ,i
cr ,l
cr ,g
(8)
cr,l
cr,i
0.8
Fy = 350 MPa
hw = 2000 mm
tw = 4 mm
hw /tw = 500
0.6
=a/b =1.0
= 37o
0.4
0.2
0
100
200
300
400
500
Panel width (mm)
600
700
800
cr,l
(6)
cr ,i
1
+
y
The following equation is currently adopted to account for the interaction between the two buckling
modes described earlier (Elgaaly et al. 1996, Johnson & Cafolla 1997a):
1
1
+
cr ,g
cr,g
(5)
= 1
cr ,l
where Ix is the second moment of area of one wavelength of the web having a projected length c and
an actual length s, tw is the web thickness, b is the
panel width, d is the horizontal projection of the inclined panel width and is the corrugation angle.
(7)
To calculate the critical stress for an inelastic interactive buckling mode, cr,in,l and cr,in,g are used in
Equation 6 instead of cr,l and cr,g respectively.
Another interaction equation which includes all
the failure criteria has been proposed [Sayed-Ahmed
2001, 2005a, El- Metwally & Loov 1999). The new
equation takes the form:
cr ,g = k g
(D
Fy = 350 MPa
hw = 1000 mm
tw = 2 mm
hw /tw = 500
cr,i
0.8
0.6
=a/b =1.0
= 37o
0.4
0.2
0
100
200
300
400
500
Panel width (mm)
600
700
800
29
Stiffener Plate
V = hw t w
Shear Force
tfl
hw
Sec. 1-1
Stress
tw
Fy=350
MPa
Et=0.001 E
20
2
500
0.04
250
50
20
2.252
(9)
bfl
G5
V = hw tw
Stress
E=200 GPa
Strain
Strain
GPa
Stress-strain relations =0.3 & E=200
G=77 GPa
Figure 4. Geometry and loading configuration of the analyzed
(above); and material model adopted in the analysis (below).
Plane of
Symmet
Line of support
Girder G1
L=10.48 m
Local
buckling
Vcr / Vy
1.5
Plane of
Symmetry
Fy = 350 MPa
hw = 500 mm
tw = 2 mm
hw /tw = 250
=a/b =1.0
Global
buckling
= 37o
Yield
1
Inter.
buckling
Line of support
Girder G2
L=7.86 m
Eqs 6&7
0.5
Plane of
Symmet
50
100
150
200
250
300
Panel width (mm)
Line of support
2
Vcr / Vy
Plane of
Symmet
Local
buckling
1.5
450
= 37o
Yield
1
Line of support
Inter.
buckling
Girder G4
L=4.06 m
Figure 5. Typical finite element meshes adopted in the
analysis (Girders are plotted in different scales).
400
Fy = 350 MPa
hw = 500 mm
tw = 2 mm
hw /tw = 250
=a/b =1.0
Global
buckling
Girder G3
L=5.24 m
350
Nonlinear FE model
Eqs. 1 to 8
Eqs 6&7
0.5
50
100
150
200
250
300
Panel width (mm)
350
400
450
Figure 6. Critical loads determined analytically and numerically based on eigenvalue buckling analysis (above) and
nonlinear finite element analysis (below).
31
Global
buckling
Local
buckling
Yield
V / Vy
= 37o
Inter.
buckling
(Eq. 8)
0.8
Fy = 350 MPa
hw = 500 mm
tw = 2 mm
hw /tw = 250
=a/b =1.0
0.6
0.4
50
100
150
200
250
300
Panel width (mm)
350
400
450
0.8
V / )Vy
V/Vy and (Vult -V
cr / Vult
= 37o
WR =
EC w
GJ
Cb
L
E I y G J (1 + WR2 )
(10)
Vcr/Vy
(Vult-Vcr)/Vult
0.2
50
100
150
200
250
300
Panel width (mm)
350
400
450
(11)
where Mocr is the critical moment for a beam subjected to constant bending, Cb is the equivalent moment factor, E is the Youngs modulus, G is the elastic shear modulus, and L is the beam span. Iy, J and
Cw are the second moment of area about the weak
axis of inertia, the torsional constant, and the warp-
Vult/Vy
0.4
M cr = Cb M ocr =
0.6
MA
M
+ 0 .3 ( A ) 2
MB
MB
2 .3
(12)
where MA is the smaller end moment. MA/MB is positive for beams bent in double curvature and negative
for beams bent in single curvature. CAN/CSAS16.1-02 specifications (CSA 2002) adopted Equation 12 in design with a change in its limiting value
from 2.3 to 2.5. The same specifications use Cb of
32
1.0 when the moment between the end supports becomes greater than the end moment or when there is
no lateral support for the compression flange at one
of the ends of the unsupported length. The AISCLRFD specifications (AISC 2003) define the following equation for the equivalent moment factor:
12.5 M max
Cb =
3 M 1 + 4 M 2 + 3 M 3 + 2.5 M max
2t fl
(13)
Cb = A
AB
(14)
b fl
2t fl
b fl
2t fl
b fl
2t fl
145
Fy
hw 1100
tw
Fy
170
Fy
hw 1700
tw
Fy
200
Fy
hw 1900
tw
Fy
b fl
0.38
E
Fy
hw
E
3.76
tw
Fy
0.83
E
Fy 69
(16)
hw
E
5.70
tw
Fy
Both Class 1 and Class 2 sections of CAN/CSAS16.1-02 specifications are considered as one class
according to the AISC-LRFD (compact sections).
On the other hand, the limit on Class 3 section according CAN/CSA-S16.1-02 is more restricted. For
non-compact sections, the AISC-LRFD uses Fy 69
in determining the yield moment to account for a residual stress of 69 MPa in case of hot-rolled steel
sections (for welded sections the 69 MPa is replaced
by 114 MPa).
3.3 Lateral Torsion Buckling of Steel I-Girders with
Corrugated Webs
Compact sections :
(15)
buckling
300analysis. The buckling analysis was perb x twcross
200x2
400x2
formed on girders having the
sections
shown
20
in Figure 10. The span of all the analyzed girders
b x tw for
200x4
400x4
was 11.52 m. Two panel widths
the corrugated
web were adopted in the analysis: 200 mm and 400
mm, which correspond
a = to
b web height
520 to panel width
t
w
ratios of 0.42 and 0.83. Web thicknesses
= a/b = of
1.0 2 mm
and 4 mm were considered in thedanalysis,
= a cos which
correspond to web height-to-thickness
h = dratios
tan of 120
and 240. The analyzed corrugationc panel
= b + dwidth-to1
Sec. 1-1
thickness
ratio ranges between 50 and
The
s = b200.
+ d/cos
inclined panel of the corrugated web teqwas
assumed
to
= (s/c) tw
have the same width as the horizontal panel (a=b): a
typical practical geometric1 configurationStiff
for Pl.
the trapezoidal corrugation
L = 11.52 m profile of the web. Stiffener
plates 20 mm thick were added at the support locations for all the analyzed girders hto prevent bearing
locations. The flange
failure of the webs at these
width and thickness (bfl/2tfl = 15) as well as the web
height were kept bconstantd through the analysis. The
Figure 10. Geometric
properties
of corrugated
webgirders
girders
mechanical
and material
properties
of the
numerically analyzed for lateral torsion buckling.
cross-section are listed in Table 2.
Table 2. Mechanical and material properties of the analyzed
corrugated web girders*.
tw =2 mm
tw =4 mm
13.07
14.13
770.5
791
90
90
rx mm
243
236
ry mm
83
79.8
2963
3042
600
600
3127
3255
900
900
Property
3
Ix (10 ) mm
A (10 ) mm
Iy (10 ) mm
Sx (103) mm3
Sy (10 ) mm
3
Zx (10 ) mm
3
Zy (103) mm3
Cw (109) mm3
J (10 ) mm
3
5625
5625
1602
1614
Shear modulus
G (GPa)
76.9
Poissons
ratio
0.3
Uniaxial yield
strength
Fy (MPa)
350
(17)
Figure 11. FE mesh for the 400 mm (above) and the 200
mm (below) corrugated web panel width girder.
34
Girder G8
Girder G6
M
M/2
Girder G7
M/2
Girder G9
M
Girder G10
P
P
Girder G12
Girder G11
P
Girder G13
The analytical values of the critical moments McrEq.11 were calculated using Equation 11 with the
equivalent moment factor Cb evaluated using Equation 12 for girders subjected to end moments or
Equation 14 for girders subjected to concentrated
loads. The theoretically calculated critical moments
Mcr-Eq.11 were compared to the critical moment resulting from the numerical analysis Mcr-FE.
Table 3. Results of the finite element buckling analysis for corrugated steel web girders subjected to end moments.
b = 400 mm
tw = 4 mm
b = 200 mm
tw =2 mm
Panel
dim.
Girder
G6
G7
G8
G9
G10
Cb-Eq.12
1.3
1.75
2.3
2.3
606
798
1098
1523*
1661*
1.32
1.81
2.51
2.74
1.152
1.167
1.192
1.258
1.373
635.1
836
1145
1559*
1664*
1.31
1.8
2.45
2.62
1.204
1.219
1.24
1.285
1.372
Mcr-FE
(kN.m)
Cb-FE
Mcr-FE /
Mcr-Eq 11
Mcr-FE
(kN.m)
Cb-FE
Mcr-FE /
Mcr-Eq 11
*Lateral
0
mm
tw =
4
Panel
dim.
Girder
G11
G12
G13
Cb-Eq.13
1.31
1.31
1.31
Cb-Eq.14
0.96
1.35
1.9
Mcr-FE
609
848
1122
Cb-FE
0.958
1.335
1.766
Mcr-FE /
Mcr-Eq 11*
1.202
1.19
1.12
2.75
2.25
MB
1.60
Cb-Eq. 12
Cb
2.00
1.50
1.40
1.75
1.30
Mcr-FE / Mcr-Eq. 11
1.50
1.20
1.25
1.10
1.00
1.00
-1.00
-0.50
0.00
MA / MB
0.50
2.75
2.50
MA
2.25
Cb-F.E.
Cb Eq. 12
CAN/CSA
S16.1
MB
Mcr-FE / Mcr-Eq. 11
MA
1.70
1.00
1.70
1.60
Cb-Eq. 12
bxt w =200 mm x 2 mm
1.40
Cb
2.00
1.50
1.75
1.30
Mcr-FE / Mcr-Eq. 11
1.50
1.25
1.20
Mcr-FE / Mcr-Eq. 11
2.50
Cb-F.E.
Cb Eq. 12
CAN/CSA
S16.1
1.10
1.00
1.00
-1.00
-0.50
0.00
MA / MB
0.50
1.00
Figure 13. Equivalent moment factor and the critical moments for girders with corrugated webs subjected to end moments.
2.00
Cb-Eq. 14
1.80
Cb
1.20
Cb - F.E.
Mcr-FE/Mcr-Eq. 11
1.20
1.15
Mcr-FE / Mcr-Eq. 11
bxt w = 200 mm x 4 mm
1.60
1.40
1.25
Cb - CAN/CSA-S16.1
1.00
Above the shear centre
-0.25
0.00
0.25
1.10
0.50
Figure 14. Equivalent moment factor for girders with corrugated webs subjected to central concentrated loads.
the average flange outstand Lav (Fig. 15). The average flange outstand corresponds to bfl/2 which is traditionally used for girders with plane webs.
Based on a previous investigation (Johnson &
Cafolla 1997b), it was argued that the average flange
outstand Lav may only be used as bfl/2 if a ratio R is
less that 0.14 where R is the ratio between area
EFGH and area ABCD defined in Figure 15. For R
greater than 0.14, which is more practical, it is recommended to be conservative using the large flange
outstand Ll. Thus, a considerable uncertainty still exists regarding the correct value which should be used
for the flange outstand of corrugated web girders.
36
Ls
tfl
Ll
Lav
Figure 15. Flange outstands and geometric properties of the corrugated web
girders analyzed for local flange buckling.
300
CAN/CSA-S16.1 limit
NonCompact
3.00
AISC limit
Non-Compact
2.50
2.00
Ncr / Ny
a
B
1.50
1.00
Ls
520
tw
Ncr/Ny = 1.0
b/t w = 50
0.50
b/tw = 100
0.00
0.00
10.00
20.00
30.00
40.00
Ncr / N y
2.00
1.50
Non-Compact
2.50
Non-Compact
3.00
1.00
b/t w = 50
0.50
b/t w = 100
0.00
0.00
10.00
20.00
30.00
40.00
50.00
Figure 16. Local buckling of corrugated web girders flanges and current compact section limits.
37
Ncr
Ncr
Ncr
S.S.
Ncr
Free edge
S.S.
S.S. edge
Ncr
S.S.
Free edge
Free edge
Fixed edge
S.S.
Boundary - AISC
S.S.
S.S.
Ncr
bfl /2
bfl /2
bfl /2
k=1.277
k=0.70
k=0.425
N cr /N y (k=0.7)
3.50
3.00
Ncr / Ny
2.50
N cr /N y (k=0.425)
b/t w = 50
b/t w = 100
2.00
N cr/N y (k=1.277)
1.50
Ncr/Ny = 1.0
1.00
0.50
0.00
0.00
10.00
20.00
bfl / 2 t fl (based on Ll)
30.00
40.00
Figure 18. Local buckling of the corrugated web girders flanges and the assumed buckling coefficients of the AISC-LRFD.
39
40