Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
II.
Readings:
a. Mission,
in
Christian
Dogmatics.
Edited
by
Carl
E.
Braaten
and
Robert
Jenson
(Fortress
Press,
Philadelphia,
1984),
235-236.
b. Raghav
Krishna,
Krishna
Bhakti
to
Christianity
to
Krista
Bhakti,
in
Rethinking
Hindu
Ministry
II.
Papers
from
the
Rethinking
Forum,
pp.
913.
c. Klaus
Detlev
Schulz,
Theses
on
the
Missionary
Nature
of
the
Church.
(Handout)
d. Alan
Hirsch,
The
Forgotten
Ways
(Grand
Rapids:
Brazon
Press,
2006),
149-177.
e. Ralph
Winter,
The
Two
Structures
of
Gods
Redemptive
Mission
(Handout)
f. Olaf
Petri,
Mission
and
the
Church
(1841).
(Handout)
g. Christian
Keysser,
A
People
Reborn
(Pasadena:
William
Carey
Library,
1980),
pp.
288-290
(Handout)
h. Klaus
Detlev
Schulz,
Mission
from
the
Cross
(St.
Louis:
CPH,
2009)
Reflection
or
Discussion
Points
a. Please
comment
on
the
truthfulness
of
these
two
hermeneutical
perspectives:
The
writings
that
now
comprise
our
Bible
are
themselves
the
product
of
and
witness
to
the
ultimate
mission
of
God...Mission
is
not
just
one
of
a
list
of
things
that
the
Bible
happens
to
talk
about,
only
a
bit
more
urgently
than
some.
Mission
is...what
its
all
about.
Christopher
Wright,
The
Mission
of
God
(Downers
Grove:
IVP
2006),
22.
Lesslie
Newbigin,
in
his
essay
The
Logic
of
Mission
(p.
116):
There
has
been
a
long
tradition
which
sees
the
mission
of
the
church
primarily
as
obedience
to
a
commandthis
way
of
putting
the
matter
is
certainly
not
without
justification,
and
yet
it
seems
to
me
that
it
misses
the
point.
It
tends
to
make
mission
a
burden
rather
than
a
joy,
to
make
it
part
of
the
law
rather
than
part
of
the
Gospel.
b. Many
missiologists
call
the
missio
Dei
term
a
Trojan
horse.
Whats
the
point
they
wish
to
make?
c. In
the
mission
article
(Braaten)
what
do
you
think
is
in
need
of
clarification?
d. How
does
the
Krista
Bhakti
article
match
up
with
Lutheran
ecclesiology?
Is
there
something
we
must
be
aware
of
in
terms
of
strategizing
for
the
Eastern
context?
e. What
point
are
some
missiologists
making
with
their
use
of
the
term
missional
and
in
what
way
could
Lutheran
theology/missiology
contribute
to
that
discussion?
(Schulz
Theses)
f. What
should
apostolic
mean
for
the
mission
of
the
church
and
is
Hirschs
proposal
for
a
revival
of
apostolicity
(or
apostle
leadership)
with
the
ADEPT
model
(Eph
4:12)
helpful
and
exegetically
trustworthy?
g. Describe
your
understanding
of
the
relationship
between
church/congregations
(modalities)
and
mission
societies
(sodalities)?
Do
you
think
that
Winters
conclusion
is
correct
that
sodalities
have
always
existed
alongside
modalities?
How
does
Petri
connect
the
church
and
mission
societies,
and
how
does
that
inform
the
missionarys
responsibility?
h. How
did
the
first
article
of
creation
influence
Keyssers
understanding
of
baptism?