there was deemed a valid waiver where, upon a warrantless search of a hotel room, consent and voluntary surrender of papers belonging to the registered but absent occupant was given by a woman identified as the wife of the occupant although it turned out later that she was, in fact, a mere manicurist. This ruling was not applied in People v. Asis, G.R. No. 142531, October 15, 2002, because at the time the bloodstained pair of shorts was recovered, appellant Formento, together with his wife and mother, was present. Being the subject of the search, he himself should have given consent. Added to this is the fact that the appellant is a deaf-mute who could not understand what was happening at the moment, there being no interpreter to assist him. His seeming acquiescence to the search without a warrant may be attributed to plain and simple confusion and ignorance.