Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Presentation Outline
Preliminaries
Evaluation Policy
What?
Why?
11/14/2012
Preliminaries
Evaluation Defined
Institution
Definition
OECD
DAC
UN
Evaluation
Group
11/14/2012
Accountability
- disclosing information to stakeholders
- to inform resource allocation
5
Note: Framework based on the results-based Public Sector Management (PSM) framework developed
by the Asia-Pacific Community of Practice on Managing for Development Results (APCoP-MfDR).
6
6
11/14/2012
EO 230
Reorganizing
NEDA mandates
the agency to
monitor and
evaluate the
implementation
of the PDP
1987
NB Resolution
No. 30 instructed
the ICC to review all
ongoing ODAfunded projects
with the aim of
improving
absorptive capacity
1989
1992
EO 376 established
the Regional Project
Monitoring and
Evaluation System
(RPMES) for M&E at
the sub-national
level
RA 8182 (as
amended by RA
8555) mandated
NEDA to conduct an
annual review of
status of all ODA
projects
1993
EO 93 further
refined and
streamlined the
roles and
responsibilities and
operating
procedures under
the RPMES
1996
Sector Effectiveness
and Efficiency Review
(joint exercise by DBM
and NEDA, through
the 2001 National
Budget Call) assessed
the responsiveness of
programs and projects
to sector outcome
objectives
AO 25 provided the
mechanism for the
establishment of a
unified and integrated
Results-Based
Performance
Management System
within the Executive
Branch of the
government.
2001
2011
1999
NB Resolution No. 3
provides for
reporting of project
outcomes and
impacts by ICC and
Implementing
Agencies
2007
Evaluation Policy
11/14/2012
Evaluation Policy
What is it?
A policy framework to guide evaluation activities.
Why do we need it?
Evaluation is a crucial function that informs
decision-making. A set of policy statements on it
will promote and strengthen the practice and use
of evaluations.
9
Evaluation Policy
How do we proceed?
Elements of an evaluation policy
evaluation concepts, role of evaluation
guiding principles, evaluation standards
conduct of evaluation (programming, planning, design,
management)
defined institutional responsibilities
disclosure and dissemination protocols
periodic review of policy
Note: See Guidance to Programmes for Developing an Evaluation Policy.
http://www.un.org/Depts/oios/pages/ied_guidance_for_dev_ep.pdf
10
11/14/2012
11
Guiding Principles
Institution
Principles/Norms
UN
Evaluation
Group
MPI Vietnam
Independent,
Intentional,
Transparent,
Ethical, Impartial, Of High Quality, Timely,
Used
Cost Effective, Usefulness, Impartiality and
Independence, Credibility, Participation,
Harmonization, Evaluation Programming
OECD DAC
11/14/2012
Evaluation Coverage
What will be evaluated?
Plans
Sectors
Policy(ies)
Programs and Projects
13
Evaluation Protocols
Processes and activities to ensure that evaluations
are timely, credible, impartial and inform decisionmaking.
14
11/14/2012
Cost-Effective
Standard on Measurement and Analysis
Note: See Standard on Evaluation for the Government of Canada (April 2009).
http://ncc.evaluationcanada.ca/downloads/TBS_EvaluationStandards_En.pdf
15
Ethically-based
Competencies of the Evaluation Team
Project Management
Note: See Standard on Evaluation for the Government of Canada (April 2009).
http://ncc.evaluationcanada.ca/downloads/TBS_EvaluationStandards_En.pdf
16
11/14/2012
Evaluation Reports
Utilization
Note: See Standard on Evaluation for the Government of Canada (April 2009).
http://ncc.evaluationcanada.ca/downloads/TBS_EvaluationStandards_En.pdf
17
Indicative Responsibilities
Institution
NEDA
DBM
IAs
Others
11/14/2012
19
Suggestions/Concerns?
Evaluation Policy Drafting Process
-
Timelines
Activities
Other concerns
-
Capacity development
10
11/14/2012
11