Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Abstract-Improving the up-conversion efficiency is the key issue in rare earth doped glasses. The quantum efficiency, optical
gap, radiative transition rate and lifetimes of excited states are greatly influenced by the optical properties of the host
material, ligand field, multi-phonon relaxation processes, impurities, temperature and concentration of rare earth ions. This
presentation gives a panoramic view of the state of art of investigating experimentally the optical properties of rare earth
doped phosphate and tellurite glasses with different compositions and preparation techniques that our group has been carried
out in the recent past. We have prepared these glasses by using two different methods melt quenching and sol-gel, however in
the present paper we only report on the former method. Series of erbium-doped magnesium-phosphate glasses based on
(P2O5)0.5(MgO)0.5-x(Er2O3 / Nd2O3)x, ytterbium-doped sodium-tellurite glasses based on (80 x)TeO2 20Na2O-(x)Yb2O3
(x=0.0-2.0 mol%), samarium-doped glasses having composition of (P2O5)50-x(MgO) 50-(Sm2O3) x (0x4 mol%), and (50x)P2O5-50MgO-xSm2O3 (x= 0.0-3.0 mol%) have been studies. In addition, ytterbium-doped sodium-tellurite glasses having
composition of (80 x)TeO220Na2O-(x)Yb2O3 (x=0.0-2.0 mol%) is also presented. The amorphous nature of all these samples
is confirmed using the X-ray diffraction technique. The optical properties of the glass have been measured employing Infrared,
FTIR and UV-Visible spectroscopy. The vibrational frequencies are attributed predominately due to the OH- band, P=O, P-OP, and P-O- stretching vibrations respectively. Furthermore, it is found that the absorption cut-off wavelength very much
depending on the MgO contents and the integration mode area of absorption band is strongly affected by the phosphate
contents. Our systematic spectral analysis revealed that the substitution of P2O5 by a small amount of Sm2O3 has negligible
effect on the absorption band and hence on the glass structure. It is further observed that MgO does not affect the P-O bond
characters. The optical energy gap (Eg ) and the Urbach energy (E) has been estimated from the absorption edge studies. It is
found that Eg depend on the concentration of the non bridging oxygen in the glass network. Meanwhile, E is found to be
depending on the Yb2O3 concentration. Interestingly, samarium doped magnesium-phosphate glasses have been found to
change from colorless to light yellow on increasing the Sm2O3 content. The transmission spectra of ytterbium-doped sodiumtellurite glasses revealed that the predominant absorption peaks are due to the vibration of Te-O-Te and Yb3+ ions. The main
results on vibrational frequencies, optical gap, Urbach energy and absorption edge has been found to be quantitatively
consistent with other observations. Our detailed systematic spectroscopic studies provide useful information for further
development of up-conversion lasers.
Keywords: Phosphate glass, Tellurite glass, Melt-quenching, Sol-gel, Optical absorption, UV-VIS Spectroscopy, X-ray
diffraction, IR-spectroscopy, Optical properties, Cut-off wavelength, Urbach energy.
I.
INTRODUCTION
In the new millennium, there has been a renaissance in
the study of rare-earth doped glass materials for photonic
applications, e.g. phosphors, display monitors, X-ray
imaging, scintillators, lasers, up-conversion and amplifiers
for fiber-optic communications [110]. There are many
candidates in the family viz., borate, chalcogenide, fluoride,
germinate, oxynitride, silicate, phosphate, sulphide,
zirconate, and tellurite glasses. Rare-earth ions, especially
erbium, ytterbium and samarium, have played an important
role in the development of broadband fiber amplifiers in
optical communication technology during the past few
decades [5-7]. Phosphate glasses has attracted much
attention in recent years due to their unique high thermal
expansion, low melting temperature, high transmission in
the UV region and radiative properties [1, 2]. The main
advantage of a phosphate glass over other oxide glasses (e.g.
silicate and borate) is its ability to accommodate high
concentration of transition metal ions and remain
amorphous. In addition, phosphate glasses enjoy a range of
compositional and structural possibilities (ultra, meta, pyro,
and ortho) that facilitate tailoring chemical and physical
ISSN 0853-0823
10
ISSN 0853-0823
11
( )h = Constant h E g
)n
(2)
( (
))
ISSN 0853-0823
12
P2O5
(mol%)
MgO
(mol%)
Er2O3
(mol%)
Nd2O3
(mol%)
S1
50.00
47.25
2.50
0.25
S2
50.00
47.00
2.50
0.50
S3
50.00
46.75
2.50
0.75
S4
50.00
46.50
2.50
1.00
S5
50.00
48.00
1.50
0.50
S6
50.00
47.50
2.50
0.50
S7
50.00
46.50
3.00
0.50
2.
CUT-OFF WAVELENGTH
CONTENTS.
VERSUS
Sample No.
MgO (mol%)
cut-off (nm)
S1
47.25
322
S2
47.00
321
S3
46.75
319
S4
46.50
318
S5
48.00
321
S6
47.50
320
S7
46.50
318
MGO
ISSN 0853-0823
13
MgO
Sm2O3
S1
50
50
S2
49
50
S3
48
50
S4
47
50
S5
46
50
50.0
45
40
S5
35
30
%T
25
S4
S3
S2
20
15
S1
10
0.0
4000.0
3600
3200
2800
2400
2000
1800
1600
1400
1200
1000
800
600
400.0
cm-1
Figure 6. IR absorption spectra of the [P2O5]50-x -[MgO]50-[Sm2O3] x glass system with x=0, 1, 2, 3 and 4 mol%.
ISSN 0853-0823
14
Sample
no.
S1
472.05
752.99
931.82
1086.31
1341.07
3425.98
S2
462.99
757.00
927.77
1076.92
1333.67
3413.79
S3
467.03
762.94
931.59
1068.53
1323.49
3413.87
S4
474.95
764.80
931.36
1074.12
1315.05
3414.16
S5
474.81
768.84
927.80
1082.51
1307.34
3414.20
(a)
(b)
Figure 7. Variation of frequency of vibration of P-O-P mode (a)
and P=O mode (b) as a function of Sm2O3 concentration.
Figure 8. Relative area of OH- absorption band (cm2) of [P2O5]50x[MgO] 50-[Sm2O3] x, with 0x4 mol% glass system.
15
TABLE 5. NOMINAL COMPOSITION OF THE P2O5-MgOSm2O3 GLASSES AND THE VALUES OF Eg AND
E EXTRACTED FROM THE PLOT.
Sample
number
Nominal composition
(mol%)
P2O5 MgO Sm2O
Optical band
gap (Eg) in eV
Urbach energy
(E) in eV
S1
50
50
4.35
0.32
S2
49
50
4.45
0.28
S3
48
50
4.30
0.29
S4
47
50
4.30
0.37
ISSN 0853-0823
16
Sample Number
1
3423
1643
1382
732
606
3423
1640
1381
727
600
3417
1637
1380
727
599
3412
1632
1377
724
592
3405
1635
1377
721
589
TABLE
6.
Sample
number
OF
THE
54
50
45
Nominal Composition
(mol%)
T%
40
TeO2
Na2O
Yb2O3
S1
70.0
30
35
S2
69.5
30
0.5
30
S3
69.0
30
1.0
25
S4
68.5
30
1.5
20
S5
64.0
30
2.0
15
10
5
4000
3000
2000
1500
1000
450
Figure 13. X-ray diffraction patterns for the glass system. (80 x)
TeO2 20Na2O - (x)Yb2O3 glass system.
ISSN 0853-0823
17
III. CONCLUSION
In conclusion, the phosphate glass sample has
successfully been made and their amorphous nature has
been confirmed by X-ray diffraction techniques. The IR
spectra show that there are six broad absorption peaks
corresponding to the OH- band, P=O, P-O-P, P-O- stretching
vibrations. The absorption cut-off wavelength in the range
318 nm to 322 nm depends strongly on the concentration of
MgO in the sample.
In a separate study the [P2O5]50-x-[MgO]50-[Sm2O3]x
glass with 0x4 mol% has been prepared again by melt
quenching technique. XRD shows all samples are glass in
nature. While, IR shows that the glass network is dominated
by the existence of asymmetric and symmetric of P-O-P
bridges around 931 cm-1-928 cm-1 and 753 cm-1-769 cm-1
respectively. While, P=O asymmetric stretching vibration
modes exists around 1307 cm-1-1341cm-1. For low Sm3+
content, the glass becomes more stable but only up to 3
mol% when the glass start to be precisely influence by the
existence of broad OH peak. In this case, the Sm2O3 may act
as a modifier.
To estimate the relevant optical parameter a series of
samarium doped magnesium phosphate glasses have been
made and the optical absorption characteristics showed that
the transition is of indirect type with n=2. The doping of
Sm2O3 into the glass network with the present of MgO as
modifying oxides does not alter very much the optical
nature of band gap as well as the Urbach energy tail. Only
after the further addition of 1 mol% Sm2O3 the optical band
gap is affected because the formation range of the glass
become very small beyond a certain threshold concentration
of the samarium ion.
We further investigate the optical behavior of a series of
ytterbium doped sodium tellurite glasses. Glasses with more
than 2 mol% of Yb2O3 are found to be chemically unstable.
The X-ray diffraction pattern confirms the amorphous
nature of the samples. The infrared absorption spectra for all
the glasses showed bands around 3500, and 600 cm1. Rare
earths connected to the chains of TeO4 groups identified
based on the simultaneous presence of the bands at 589 to
606 cm1. Our spectroscopic investigations on phosphate
and tellurite samples prepared by sol-gel techniques will be
reported in future communications.
Temperature and concentration dependence of the
multi-phonon relaxation rates, radiative decay and upconversion luminescence is worth to look at. It is hoped that
our detail systematic experimental study may provide useful
information for exploiting rare earth doped tellurite and
phosphate glasses in fabricating up-conversion lasers. In
addition, there is a need to extend our studies to examine the
temporal behavior of up-conversion emission and Stokes
emission for red and green transition. A complete
microscopic picture on optical characteristics, however,
require rigorous theoretical model and simulation on the
local bonding environment and the local vibrational density
of states of the rare earth ion within the matrix because
some of these vibrational modes may or may not be coupled
to electronic excited states. The effect of embedded metallic
nanoparticles on the optical properties of these glasses will
be reported elsewhere.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
S.K. Ghoshal especially thanks to the Physics Department,
Universiti Teknologi Malaysia for providing research
facilities to complete this work.
REFERENCES
[1] Jong-Oh Byun, Byong-Ho Kim, Kun-Sun Hong , Hyung-Jin Jung ,
Sang-won Lee, and A.A. Izyneev, J. Non-Cryst. Sol. 190 (1995) 288.
[2] A. Mogus-Milankovic, V. Licina, S.T. Reis, and D.E. Day, J. NonCryst. Sol. 353 (2007) 2659.
[3] E. Metwalli, M. Karabulut, D.L. Sidebottom, M.M. Morsi, and R.K.
Brow, J. Non-Cryst. Sol, 344 (2004) 128.
[4] H. Desirena, E. De la Rosa, L.A. Daz-Torres, and G.A. Kumar, Opt.
Mater. 28 (2006) 560.
[5] Sherief M. Abo-Naf, N.A. Ghoneim, and H. A. El-Batal, J. Mater. Sc.:
Mater. in Elect. 15 (2004) 273.
[6] Chun Jiang, Fuxi Gan, Junzhou Zhang, Peizhen Deng, and Guosong
Huang, Mater. Lett. 41 (1999) 209.
[7] M.J. Weber, J.D. Myers, and D.H. Blackburn, J. Appl. Phys. 52 (1981)
2944.
[8] H. Nii, K. Ozaki, M. Herren, and M. Morita, J. Lumin. 7677 (1998)
116.
[9] J.S. Wang, E.M. Vogel, and S. Snitzer, Opt. Mater. 3 (1994) 187.
[10] S. Xu, D. Fang, Z. Zhang, and Z. Jiang, J. Solid State Chem. 178
(2005) 1817.
[11] W. Ryba-Romanwski, S. Golab, L. Cichosz, and B. JezowaskaTrzebiatawska, J. Non- Cryst. Sol. 105 (1988) 295.
[12] S. Biswal, J. Nees, A. Nishimura, H. Takuma,and G.
Mourou,Opt.Comm. 160 (1999) 92.
[13] Brian M. Walsh, Norman P. Barnes, and Russell and J. DeYoung.
Lath. Glass Spectroscopy and Fiber Laser, 2008.
[14] O. Glatter, and O.Kratky Small Angel X-ray Scattering Academic
Press, 1982.
[15] I. Simon, Modern Aspects of the Vitreous State, Butterworth, London,
1964.
[16] N.F. Mott, and E.A. Davis, Phil. Mag. 28 (1970) 903.
[17] A.A. Higazy, B.Y. El-Baradic, and M.I. Abd El-Ati, J. Mater. Sci.
Lett. 11 (1992) 581.
[18] F. Urbach, Phys. Rev. 92 (1953) 1324.
[19] F.F. Sene, J.R. Martinelli, and L. Gomes, J. Non-Cryst. Sol. 348
(2004) 63.
[20] M.R. Sahar, A. Wahab M.A. Hussein, and R. Hussin, J. Non-Cryst.
Sol. 353 (2007) 1134.
[21] S.M. Abo-Naf , M.S. El-Amiry, and A.A. Abdel-Khalek, Opt. Mat. 30
(2008) 900.
[22] P.Y. Shih, S.W. Yung, and T.S. Chin. J. Non-Cryst. Sol. 244 (1999)
211.
[23] Dora Ilieva, Bojidar Jivov, Georgi Bogachev, Christo Petkov, Ivan
Penkov, and Yanko Dimitriev, J. Non-Cryst. Sol. 283 (2001) 195.
[24] P. Znik, M. Jamnick, J. Non-Cryst. Solids 146 (1992) 74.
[25] A. Abdel-Kader, A.A. Higazy, and M.M. Elkholy, J. Mater. Sci.:
Mater. Electron. 2 (1991) 157.
[26] K. Nakamoto, Infra-Red Spectra of Inorganic and Coordination
Compounds, Wiley, New York, 1963.
[27] A.G. Shikerkar, J.A.E. Desa, P.S.R. Krishna, and R.Chitra, J. NonCryst. Sol. 270 (2000) 234.
[28] Y.M. Moustafa, and K.El. Egili, J. Non-Cryst. Sol. 240 (1998) 144.
[29] E.I. Kamitsos, A.P. Patsis, M.A. Karakassides, and G.D. Chryssikos, J.
Non-Cryst. Sol. 126 (1990) 52.
[30] E.I. Kamitsos, J.A. Kapoutsis, G.D. Chryssikos, J.M. Hutchinson,
A.J.Pappin, M.D. Ingram, and J.A. Duffy, Phys. Chem. Glasses 36 (3)
(1995) 141.
[31] B. Bridge and N.D. Patel, J. Non-Cryst. Sol. 91 (1987) 27.
[32] M.R. Sahar, and A.Z. Abidin, J. Mater. Sci. Lett. 13 (1994) 227.
[33] M.R. Sahar, and B. Astuti, Optical Review (2007).
[34] M. Arnaudov, V. Dimitrov, and Y. Dimitriev, Mater. Res. Bull. 17
(1982) 1121.
[35] P. Tarte, and J.A. Prins (Ed.), Physics of Non-Cystalline Solid, North
Holland, Amsterdam, 1964, p. 549.
[36] O. Lindqvist, Acta Chem. Scand. 22 (2007) 977.
[37] R.K. Brow, R.J. Kirkpatrick, and G.L. Turner, J. Non-Cryst. Sol. 116
(1990) 39.
[38] X. Fang, C.S. Ray, A. Mogus-Milankovic and D.E. Day, J. NonCryst. Sol. 283 (2001) 162.
ISSN 0853-0823
18
[39] C. Nelson and D.R. Tallant, Phys. Chem. Glass. 26 (1985) 119.
[40] R.Hussin, A.S. Musdalilah., A. Nur Shahira, A. Mutia Suhaibah, A.
Suhailah, A.F. Siti Aishah, H.
Sinin and M.Y. Mohd Noor, J. Fund. Sc. 2008 (accepted for publication).
ISSN 0853-0823