Clean Development Mechanism

PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM-SSC-PDD)
(CDM
- Version 03
CDM Executive Board
CLEAN DEVELOPMENT MECHANISM

PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM-SSC
(CDM SSC-PDD)
Version 03 - in effect as of: 22 December 2006
CONTENTS
A.
General description of the small scale project activity
B.
Application of a baseline and monitoring methodology
C.
Duration of the project activity / crediting period
D.
Environmental impacts
E.
Stakeholders comments
Annexes
Annex 1: Contact information on participants in the proposed small scale project activity
Annex 2: Information regarding public funding
fun
Annex 3: Baseline information
Annex 4: Monitoring Information

(CDM
- Version 03
CDM Executive Board
Revision history of this document

Version
Number
01
02
Date
Description and reason of revision
21 January
2003
8 July 2005
Initial adoption
03
22 December
2006
The Board agreed to revise the

he CDM SSC PDD to reflect
guidance and clarifications provided by the Board since
version 01 of this document.
As a consequence, the guidelines for completing CDM SSC
PDD have been revised accordingly to version 2. The latest
version can be found at
<http://cdm.unfccc.int/Reference/Documents
http://cdm.unfccc.int/Reference/Documents>.
The Board agreed to revise the CDM project design
document for small-scale
scale activities (CDM-SSC-PDD),
(CDM
taking
into account CDM-PDD and CDM-NM.
NM.

(CDM
- Version 03
CDM Executive Board
SECTION A. General description of small-scale project activity

A.1
Title of the small-scale

scale project activity:
Title : Biogas Project BAJ,, Menggala

Version : 2.3
Date : 19/09/2012
A.2.
Description of the small-scale

small
project activity:
The Menggala factory owned by PT.

PT Budi Acid Jaya (BAJ) is a tapioca processing plant in the
Lampung Province of Indonesia. The plant has a design starch production capacity of 100 tons per day.
The tapioca process leads to the generation of wastewater with a high organic
ganic content.
content Prior to the Project
implementation, wastewater is treated through an open anaerobic lagoon system.
The proposed Project, Biogas Project BAJ, Menggala (the Project)) will involve the installation and
operation of a digester for wastewater treatment and biogas extraction. . At the time of preparing this
version of the PDD,, the type of digester to be used has not been firmly decided. While the covered lagoon
reactor technology is the leading candidate, the possibility of the Up-flow
flow Anaerobic
Ana
Sludge Blanket
(UASB) technology has not been ruled out. The newly installed digester will facilitate the growth of
microorganisms under anaerobic conditions to digest organic materials in the wastewater. The amount of
organic materials in the wastewater (as characterized by the Chemical Oxygen Demand or COD levels)
after digestion is expected to be reduced by approximately 85% for both covered lagoon and UASB.
UASB In
order to meet the discharge limit, the wastewater will then be treated in a series of existing
existin open lagoons,
which after the Projects implementation will become the secondary treatment system.
The implementation of the system enables recovery of biogas that would have otherwise been released
into the atmosphere and utilize it for electricity generation; the excess biogas is sent to a newly installed
open flare system. Prior to the implementation of the Project, electricity consumed at the tapioca starch
production facility is supplied from fossil
fo
fuel (grid). Under the Project, the
he collected biogas is utilized for
the generation of electricity to be consumed entirely by the tapioca starch manufacturing facility In the
absence of sufficient power from the biogas generators, the starch factory and
a
biogas facility will
consume electricity sourced from the grid and only in rare cases
case of grid failure, the power will be supplied
by the diesel generators.
By treating the high organic content wastewater in the anaerobic digester, and capturing and utilizing
uti
the
biogas, the Project reduces greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions by:
1. Avoidance of methane emission to the atmosphere from anaerobic treatment of wastewater at an
open lagoon system that would continue to be used in the absence of the project activity and
2. Displacing electricity generation from fossil fuel (grid) with electricity generated from biogas in
respect of the electricity consumed at the tapioca starch production facility.
The project activity is expected to reduce GHG emissions by an annuall average of 23,449 tCO2e during
the crediting period.
The project activity will contribute to sustainable development of Indonesia in several ways:
1. Environmental criteria
a. The Project will lead to decreased
decrease GHG emissions into the atmosphere.
atmosphere

(CDM
- Version 03
CDM Executive Board
b. The Project will improve the environmental performance of the tapioca starch factory by
reducing the unpleasant odour caused by the treatment of organic wastewater at an open
lagoons system.
2. Social criteria
duri
the construction and
a. The Project provides additional employment opportunities during
operation of the wastewater treatment system.
b. The Project will develop skills of the employees through provision of training
3. Economic criteria
community By
a. The Project will improve the living and working standards for the local community.
obviating
bviating the need for grid import for the electricity consumed at the tapioca factory, the
Project will increase grid availability for households in the local community and power
supply reliability for factories and offices in the neighboring area.
4. Technology criteria
a. Technology transfer by implementing activities involving the adoption of a more advanced
technology.
A.3.
Project participants::
Table 1: Table of project participants

Name of party
Private and/or public entity(ies)
involved (*) (host)
project participants (*) (as
indicates a host party
applicable)
Kindly indicate
i
if the Party
involved wishes to be considered
as project participant
(Yes/No)
Indonesia (Host party) Private entity : PT. Budi Acid Jaya
No
(*) In accordance
dance with the CDM modalities and procedures, at the time of making the CDM-PDD
CDM
public
at the stage of validation, a Party involved may or may not have provided its approval. At the time of
requesting registration, the approval by the Party (ies) involved is required.
A.4.
Technical description of the small-scale project activity:

A.4.1. Location of the small-scale project activity:
A.4.1.1.
Host Party(ies):
Republic of Indonesia
A.4.1.2.
Region/State/Province etc.:
Lampung Province, Sumatera

ra Island
A.4.1.3.
City/Town/Community etc:
Penumangan Baru Village,, Tulang Bawang Tengah Sub-district,, Tulang Bawang Barat Regency

(CDM
- Version 03
CDM Executive Board
A.4.1.4.
Details of physical location, including information allowing the
unique identification of this small-scale project activity :
Both the wastewater treatment plant undertaken as the project activity and the tapioca starch factory that
is the source generating the wastewater to be treated by the Project are located in BAJs Menggala
Factory compound at Penumangan
Penuma
Baru Village, Tulang Bawah Tengah Sub-district,
Sub
Tulang Bawang
Barat Regency,, Lampung Province, Indonesia.
Indonesia
The coordinates of the site planned for the wastewater plant are 4o2850.310S; 105o0903.135E. The
tapioca factory (the source generating the
the wastewater) is situated approximately 150 meters south of the
planned site for the wastewater plant.
Figure 1 : Map of Lampung Province
Figure 2 : Map of Tulang Bawang Tengah Sub-district

(CDM
- Version 03
CDM Executive Board
A.4.2. Type and category(ies) and technology/measure of the small-scale

small
project activity:
1. Type and categories
The project activity fits the following types and categories as defined in Appendix B to the Simplified
Modalities and Procedures for Small-Scale
Small
CDM Project Activities:
1. Methane avoidance component:
Type III
: Other project activities
Category III.H : Methane Recovery in Wastewater Treatment
Reference
: Version 16.0, Scope 13.
2. Electricity generation component:
Type I
: Renewable energy projects
proje
Category I.F : Renewable Electricity Generation for Captive Use and Mini-Grid.
Mini
Reference
: Version 02.0, Scope 01.
2.
Technology
Anaerobic digester
Under the Project activity, an anaerobic digester equipped with a biogas recovery
recover function will be
introduced. The function of the anaerobic digester is to degrade the organic matter in the waste water.
water At
the time of preparing this version of the PDD, the type of digester to be adopted for the Project has not
been firmly decided.. While with the covered lagoon
lagoon reactor is technology is the leading candidate, the
possibility of the Up-flow
flow Anaerobic
Ana
Sludge Blanket (UASB) technology has not been ruled out. UASB
and covered lagoon are predominant technologies for anaerobic digester projects in Indonesia. All the
Indonesian AMS-III.H.
III.H. projects that have been registered use one of them, except for one (ref. 3702)
which adopted the closed continuous-flow
continuous flow stirred tank reaction (CSTR) technology based on a contract
executed in March, 2008.
The anaerobic system of covered
overed lagoon will be based on FMR (fully mixed reactor) technology, with
agitation by gas injection to the bottom of the waste water media in the digester. The system is designed
so that the effluent waste water from biological system can be recycled to anaerobic
anaerobic digester influent, for
improving efficiency and for increasing flexibility.
In the UASB reactor, the wastewater rises through an expanded bed of anaerobic active methanogenic
sludge (the so called "sludge blanket") and an internal device at the top of the reactor, which results in a
separation of the mixed liquor into clarified wastewater, biogas and sludge.
Based on the organic loading of the system and the COD available in the waste stream, it is expected that
the reactor COD removal efficiency
efficiency will be 85 % for both cover lagoon and UASB, with the details
below:
COD organic loading rate (kg/d)
Expected COD reduction (%)
Up to 18,000
85
Secondary waste water treatment and sludge treatment

The effluent from the reactor is further treated by an open lagoon system, referred to as the secondary
treatment system, in order to meet the Government regulations,
regulation in particular Government Regulation No.
82/2011.. Then, the effluent is discharged to waterway/river or applied for irrigation. Regarding the
sludge production, the reactor design enables the utilization of a technology to minimize the sludge

(CDM
- Version 03
CDM Executive Board
production. In case sludge removal is required, the removed sludge will be used for land application. The
quantity of sludge removal will be measured during
during the monitoring period as described in section B.7.1.
Destination of the collected biogas
As briefly described in section A.2, the
he collected biogas is utilized for the generation of electricity to be
consumed entirely by the tapioca starch manufacturing facility. An open flare will be installed in order to
combust any excess biogas.
Scrubber
When the collected biogas is used for power generation, it will firstly go through a biological scrubber to
remove H2S. The principle of a biological scrubber is
is that the waste air stream is contacted with a
scrubbing solution in a vessel packed with an inert support material. On the surface of the packing, a bio
film of pollutant degrading micro-organisms
micro organisms forms which aerobically degrades the absorbed pollutants1.
The biological scrubber is constructed entirely of corrosion resistant fibreglass in order to handle the
corrosive hydrogen sulphide gas, the humid conditions and the corrosive circulating liquors.
Gas engine
A biogas-fuelled
fuelled engine generator set, GE Jenbacher JGS 320 unit type, with an electrical output capacity
of 1.063 MW will be installed by the Project activity.
activity. GE Jenbacher is one of the worlds leading
manufacturers of biogas-fuelled
fuelled engines. The gas engine will be supplied by Navigat Energy, an
authorized
uthorized distributor of GE Jenbacher. The gen-set
gen set will be fuelled solely with biogas,
biogas without requiring
co-firing
firing with fossil fuels in the system.
A.4.3
Estimated amount of emission reductions over the chosen crediting period:

period
Years
1 (November 2012 ~ October 2013)
6 (November y 2017 ~ October 2018)
7 (November 2018 ~ October 2019 )
Total estimated reductions (tonnes of CO2e)
Total number of crediting years
Annual average of the estimated reductions
over the crediting period (tCO2e)
Estimation of
annual emission
reductions in tonnes
of CO2e
23,449
23,449
23,449
23,449
23,449
23,449
23,449
164,1432
7
23,449
A.4.4.
4. Public funding of the small-scale project activity:
1
Cox and Deshusses, 1998
The amount is the same regardless the choice of the anaerobic digester technology
technology because 1) no difference is expected in COD
removal ratio between covered lagoon and UASB based on the information provided by the technology providers and 2) the
applied methodology does not distinguish between the technologies in terms of leakage from the anaerobic digester. In relation to
1), it is noted that there is no other alternative for the type of digester which will be adopted for the Project.

(CDM
- Version 03
CDM Executive Board
The Project does not involve public funding from an Annex I country.
A.4.5. Confirmation that the small-scale project activity is not a debundled component of a
large scale project activity:
As defined
efined in paragraph 2 of Appendix C of the SSC M&P, a proposed small-scale
small
project activity shall
be deemed to be a debundled component of a large project activity if there is a registered small-scale
small
CDM project activity or a request for registration by another
a
small-scale
scale project activity:
By the same project participants;

In the same project category and technology/measure; and
Registered within the previous 2 years; and
Whose project boundary is within 1 km of the project boundary of the proposed small-scale
smal
activity at the closest point.
roject activity is not a debundled component of any larger project activity as there is no
The proposed project
other small-scale
scale project activity that fulfils the above mentioned criteria.. Specifically, there was no
small-scale
scale CDM project activity with the same project participant, either registered or planned, whose
project boundary is within 1 Km of the project boundary of the small scale project activity.
SECTION B. Application of a baseline and monitoring methodology

methodolog
B.1.
Title and reference of the approved baseline and monitoring methodology applied to the
small-scale project activity::
The approved baseline and monitoring methodologies which are applied
appli to the project activity are as
follows:
AMS-III.H.
III.H. Methane recovery in wastewater treatment.
Version 16.0, Scope 13, effective as of November 26, 2010
AMS-I.F. Renewable electricity generation for captive use and mini-grid
mini grid
Version 02.0, Scope 1, effective as of June 03, 2011
In addition, in accordance with the above
above methodologies, the following tools are applied.
Tool to calculate project or leakage CO2 emissions from fossil fuel combustion, version 02 ;
Emissions
sions from solid waste disposal sites,
sites version 06.0.1;
Tool to calculate baseline, project and/or leakage emission from electricity consumption,
consumption version
01;
Tool to determine project emissions from flaring gases containing methane,
methane version 01 ;
Tool to calculate
alculate the emission factor for an electricity system (version 02.2.1).
B.2
Justification of the choice of the project category:
The Project meets all the applicability conditions of the methodologies, as presented below.
Table 2:: Applicability conditions for AMS-III.H.
AMS
version 16.0

(CDM
- Version 03
CDM Executive Board
Applicability condition
This methodology comprises measures that
recover biogas from biogenic organic matter in
wastewaters by means of one, or a combination,
of the following options::
(f) Introduction of a sequential stage of
wastewater treatment with biogas recovery and
combustion, with or without sludge treatment, to
an anaerobic wastewater treatment system
without biogas recovery (e.g., introduction of
treatment in an anaerobic reactor
reac
with biogas
recovery as a sequential treatment step for the
wastewater that is presently being treated in an
anaerobic lagoon without methane recovery).
In cases where baseline system is anaerobic
lagoon the methodology is applicable if:
(a) The lagoons are ponds with a depth greater
than two meters, without aeration. The value
for depth is obtained from engineering
design documents, or through direct
measurement, or by dividing the surface area
by the total volume. If the lagoon filling
level varies seasonally, the average of the
highest and lowest levels may be
taken;
(b) Ambient temperature above 15C, at least
during part of the year, on a monthly average
basis;
(c)The minimum interval between two
consecutive sludge removal events shall be
30 days.
The recovered
red biogas from the above measures
may also be utilized for the following
applications instead of combustion/flaring:
(a) Thermal or electrical energy generation
directly;
a) Thermal or mechanical, electrical
energy generation after bottling of
upgraded biogas, in this case additional
guidance provided in Annex 1 shall be
followed;
b) Thermal or mechanical, electrical
Project case
The Project involves the installation of a
sequential stage of wastewater treatment with
methane recovery
covery and combustion,
combustion replacing an
open lagoon system with no methane recovery.
In the baseline scenario, the open lagoon system

has ponds with the following
follo
features:
deeper than 2 meters, with the depth being

8-9 meters ; without aeration;
an ambient temperature above 15degC, with

daily minimum temperatures above 223
degC throughout the year;
year
sludge removal occurs once every six

months.
The Project involves the use of the recovered

biogas (methane) as fuel for the generation of
electrical energy.
Sourced from official website Government of meteorological agency,
http://www.stametlampung.com/hal.php?hal=6

(CDM
- Version 03
CDM Executive Board
energy generation after upgrading and
distribution, in this case additional
guidance provided in Annex 1 shall be
followed:
(i)
Upgrading and injection of
o biogas
into a natural gas distribution grid
with no significant transmission
constraints;
(ii)
Upgrading and transportation of
biogas via a dedicated piped
network to a group of end users; or
(iii)
Upgrading and transportation of
biogas (e.g. by trucks) to
distribution
tion points for end users.
c) Hydrogen production;
d) Use
as
fuel
in
transportation
applications after upgrading.
If the recovered methane is used
use for project
activities covered under paragraph 3 (a), that
component of the project activity can use a
corresponding category under type I.
For project activities covered under paragraph
3(b), if bottles with upgraded biogas are sold
outside the project boundary the end-use
end
of the
biogas shall be ensured via a contract between
the bottled biogas vendor and the end-user.
end
No
emission reductions may be claimed from the
displacement of fuels from the end use of bottled
biogas in such situations. If however the end use
of the bottled biogas is included in the project
boundary and is monitored during the crediting
period CO2 emissions
sions avoided by the
displacement of fossil fuel can be claimed under
the corresponding Type I methodology, e.g.
AMS-I.C
I.C .Thermal energy production with or
without electricity.
For project activities covered under paragraph 3
(c) (i), emission reductions from the
displacement of the use of natural gas are
eligible under this methodology, provided the
geographical extent of the natural gas
distribution grid is within the host country
boundaries.
(c) (ii), emission reductions for the displacement
of the use of fuels can be claimed following the
provision in the corresponding Type I
methodology, e.g. AMS--I.C.
10
Project case
The approved baseline and monitoring

methodology AMS-I.F.
I.F. is used for the electricity
generation component of the Project activity.
Not applicable. The Project does not involve
activities described in paragraph 3(b).

activities described in paragraph 3(c) (i).

activities described in paragraph 3(c) (ii).

(CDM
- Version 03
CDM Executive Board
10
11
12
13
14
In particular, for the case of 3 (b) and (c) (iii),
the physical leakage during storage and
transportation of upgraded biogas , as well as the
emissions from fossil fuel consumed by vehicles
for transporting biogas shall be considered.
Relevant procedures in paragraph 11 of Annex 1
of AMS-III.H
III.H .Methane recovery in wastewater
treatment. shall be followed in this regard.
(b) and (c), this methodology is only applicable
if the upgraded methane content of the biogas is
in accordance with relevant national regulations
(where these exist) or, in the absence of national
regulations, a minimum of 96% (by volume).
If the recovered biogas is utilized for the
production of hydrogen (project activities
covered under paragraph 3 (d)), that component
of the project activity shall use the
corresponding
methodology
AMS
AMS-III.O.
Hydrogen production using methane extracted
from biogas
If the recovered biogas is used for project
activities covered under paragraph 3 (e), that
component of the project activity shall use
corresponding
method
methodology
AMS-III.AQ.
Introduction
of
Bio
Bio-CNG
in
road
transportation.
New facilities (Greenfield projects) and project
activities involving a change of equipment
resulting
ng in a capacity addition of the wastewater
or sludge treatment system compared to the
designed capacity of the baseline treatment
system are only eligible to apply this
methodology if they comply with the
requirements in the General guidelines to SSC
methodologies.
In addition the requirements for demonstrating
the remaining lifetime of the equipment
replaced, as described in the general guidelines
shall be followed.
The location of the wastewater treatment plant
as well as the source generating the wastewater
shall be uniquely defined and described in the
PDD.
Measures are limited to those that result in
aggregate emission reductions of less than or
equal to 60 kt CO2 equivalent annually from all
type III components
mponents of the project activity.
11
Project case
activities described in paragraph 3(b) or 3(c).

activities described in paragraph 3(b) or 3(c).

activities described in paragraph 3(d).
3(d)

activities described in paragraph 3(e).
3(e)
Not applicable. The project activity is neither a

Greenfield project not involves capacity
capa
addition
of wastewater treatment due to change of
equipment.
The location of the wastewater treatment plant

and the source generating the wastewater are
uniquely defined and described in Section A.4.1.
Ex ante emission reductions due to the
wastewater treatment is 19,222 tCO2e annually,
lower than the 60,000 tCO2e threshold.

(CDM
- Version 03
CDM Executive Board
Table 3:: Applicability conditions for AMS-I.F.

AMS
version 02.0
Applicability
lity condition
Project case
1 This methodology comprises renewable energy The Project uses a renewable energy unit, i.e.
generation units, such as photovoltaic, hydro,
biogas recovered
ecovered from the wastewater treatment
tidal/wave, wind, geothermal and renewable system to generate electricity that displaces
biomass that supply electricity to user(s). The electricity from a national grid.
project activity will displace electricity from an
electricity distribution system that is or would
have been supplied by at least one fossil fuel
fired generating unit i.e. in the absence of the
project activity, the users would have been
supplied electricity from one or more sources
listed below:
a. A national or a regional grid;
b. Fossil fuel fired captive power plant, where
the users of the captive electricity are also
connected to the grid in the project site;
c. A carbon intensive mini-grid.
mini
2 For the purpose of this methodology, a mini-grid
mini
Not applicable. The Project does not involve a
is defined as small-scale
scale power system with a mini grid.
total capacity not exceeding 15 MW
M (i.e. the sum
of installed capacities of all generators connected
to the mini-grid
grid is equal to or less than 15 MW)
which is not connected to a national or a regional
grid.
3 Illustration of respective
ctive situations under which The Project uses AMS-I.F.
AMS
each of the methodology (AMS-I.D,
(AMS
AMS-I.F and AMS-I.A)
I.A) applies is included in
Table 2.
4 Hydro power plants with reservoirs that satisfy Not applicable. The Project does not involve
at least one of the following conditions are hydro power generation.
eligible to apply this methodology:
The project activity is implemented in an
existing reservoir with no change in the volume
of reservoir;
The project activity is implemented in an
existing reservoir, where the volume of reservoir
is increased and the power density of the
t project
activity, as per definitions given in the project
emissions section, is greater than 4 W/m2;
The project activity results in new reservoirs
and the power density of the power plant, as per
definitions given in the project emissions
section, iss greater than 4 W/m2.
5 For biomass power plants, no other biomass Only biogas captured from the anaerobic
other than renewable biomass3 are to be used
wastewater is being used in the electricity
in the project plant.
generation system, and no other biomass will be
used in the Project.
12

(CDM
- Version 03
CDM Executive Board
lity condition
Applicability
This methodology is applicable for project
activities that: (a) Install a new power plant at a
site where there was no renewable energy power
plant operating
rating prior to the implementation of
the project activity (Greenfield plant); (b)
Involve a capacity addition, (c) Involve a retrofit
of (an) existing plant(s); or (d) Involve a
replacement of (an) existing plant(s).
7 In the case of project activities that involve the
capacity addition of renewable energy generation
units at an existing renewable power generation
facility, the added capacity of the units added by
the project should be lower than 15 MW
M and
should be physically distinct from the existing
units.
8 In the case of retrofit or replacement, to qualify
as a small-scale
scale project, the total output of the
retrofitted or replacement unit shall not exceed
the limit of 15 MW.
9 If the unit added has both renewable and nonnon
renewable components (e.g. a wind/diesel unit),
the eligibility
lity limit of 15MW for a small-scale
small
CDM project activity applies only to the
renewable component. If the unit added co-fires
co
fossil fuel, the capacity of the entire unit shall
not exceed the limit of 15MW.
10 Combined heat and power (co-generation)
(co
systems are not eligible under this category.
11 If electricity and/or steam/heat produced by the
project activity is delivered to a third party i.e.
another facility or facilities within the project
boundary, a contract between the supplier and
consumer(s) of the energy will have to be
entered that ensures that there is no double
counting of emission reductions.
6
B.3.
Project case
The Project is a Greenfield plant stipulated in
(a).
Not applicable. The Project does not add to an

existing renewable power generation facility.

retrofitting or replacement.
The installed capacity of the units added will be

below the 15MW threshold. As described in
section A.4.2. 2 the installed capacity of the gas
engine is 1.063 MW.
Not applicable. The project activity does not

involve co-generation.
generation.
Not applicable. The Project does not deliver
electricity and/or steam/heat to a third party.
Description of the project boundary:
In accordance with the methodologies

methodol
AMS-III.H. version 16.0 and AMS-I.F.
I.F. version 02.0, the project
boundary encompasses the following:
The project boundary in the context of AMS-III.H.
AMS III.H. is the physical, geographical site where the
wastewater and sludge treatment takes place in baseline and project situations. It covers all facilities
affected by the project activity including sites where the processing, transportation and application or
disposal of waste products as well as biogas takes place.
13

(CDM
- Version 03
CDM Executive Board
The project boundary for AMS-I.F.

AMS
includes the industrial facility consuming energy generated by the
system. The boundary also extends
extend to the project power plant and all power plants connected physically
to the electricity system that the CDM project power plant is connected to, i.e. the Sumatra grid.
boundary
The diagrams below indicate the project boundary.
Figure 3 : Project boundary

The physical units or processes that release a GHG into the atmosphere (sources) are summarized in table
below.
Baseline
Methodology
AMS-III.H.
Source
Nomenclature
GHG
Included
Justification
Emissions from power and

fuel consumption
BEpower,y
CO2
No
Ignored for
simplification,
this is
conservative
Emissions from the

wastewater treatment
system
BEww,treatment,y
CH4
Yes
Main emissions
source
No
There is no
sludge
treatment
system
Emission of the sludge

treatment system
BEs,treatment,y
14
CH4

(CDM
- Version 03
Base
line
CDM Executive Board
Methodology
Project activity
AMS-I.F.
AMS-III.H.
Source
Nomenclature
Included
Justification
Emissions from degradable

organic carbon in treated
wastewater
BEww,discharge,y
CH4
Yes
Main emissions
source
Emissions from decay of

final sludge produced
BEs,final,y
CH4
No
Not applicable
Emissions from electricity

displacement
BEy
CO2
Yes
Main emissions
source
PEpower,y
CO2
Yes
Main emissions
source
PEww,treatment,y
CH4
Yes
Main emissions
source
Emission from electricity

and fossil fuel used by the
project
roject facilities
Emission from project
system and not equipped
with biogas recovery
Emission of the project
sludge treatment
tr
system not
equipped with biogas
recovery
Emission from degradable
organic carbon in treated
wastewater
Emission from decay of
final sludge generated
Fugitive emissions due to
inefficiency in capture
systems
Emissions due
du to
incomplete flaring
Emissions from biomass
stored under anaerobic
conditions
AMS-I.F.
GHG
Emissions from renewable

energy unit
15
PEs,treatment,y
CH4
No
There is no
sludge
treatment
system
PEww,discharge,y
CH4
Yes
Main emissions
source
PEs,final,y
CH4
No
The final
sludge will be
used for soil
application as
fertilizer
PEfugitive,y
CH4
Yes
Main emissions
source
PEflaring,y
CH4
Yes
Main emissions
source
PEbiomass,y
CH4
No
Not applicable
PEy
CO2
Yes
Main emissions
source

(CDM
- Version 03
CDM Executive Board
B.4.
Description of baseline and its development:

development
Methane recovery in wastewater treatment

The baseline scenario for the methane avoidance component is a continuation of the existing anaerobic
open lagoons and release of methane
methan into the atmosphere. This practice currently in place is in full
compliance with the requirement of the relevant authority. In accordance with paragraph 26 of AMSIII.H., historical records prior to the project implementation are used to determine the baseline
ba
emissions.
Detailed calculation of baseline emissions for this part of the project activity is shown in section B.6.1.1.
In accordance with paragraph 17 of AMS-III.H.,
AMS
wastewater and sludge treatment systems equipped with
a biogas recovery facilityy in the baseline are excluded from the baseline emission calculations.
Renewable electricity generation
The baseline scenario for the renewable electricity generation component is the continuation of the
current practice use of electricity purchased from
f
the grid. The electricity baseline is determined in line
with paragraph 14 of AMS-I.F.,
I.F., i.e. The product of amount electricity displaced with the electricity
produced by the renewable generating unit and an emission factor. The electricity produced from the
wastewater treatment is used for power generation to be consumed entirely by tapioca factory and biogas
facilities.
Detailed calculation of baseline emissions is shown in section B.6.1.
B.6.1
B.5.
Description of how the anthropogenic emissions of GHG by sources are reduced below
those that would have occurred in the absence of the registered small-scale
scale CDM project activity:
Consistent with Attachment A of Appendix B of 4/CMP.1 Annex II, the Projects additionality can be
established to show that the project activity would not have occurred anyway due to at least one of the
following barriers:
1. Investment barrier;
2. Technological barrier;
3. Barrier due to prevailing practice; and
4. Other barriers
The Project faces an investment barrier, where
where it is not sufficiently financially attractive without the CER
revenue.
1. Investment Barrier
This PDD has opted to establish the Projects additionality through the investment barrier that, in
accordance with paragraph 1 of Non-binding
Non
best practice examples to demonstrate additionality for
SSC project activities (EB 35 Annex 34), includes a benchmark analysis. The ensuing section carries
out the benchmark analysis in accordance with the relevant part (Option
Option III)
III of the Tool for the
demonstration and assessment of additionality version 06.00
0
(EB 65,, Annex 21), hereinafter referred to
as the Additionality Tool.. In line with the tool, the Internal Rate of Return (IRR) is chosen as the
financial indicator.
16

(CDM
- Version 03
CDM Executive Board
1.1 WACC Benchmark Analysis

The benchmark
rk proposed for the Project is the weighted average cost of capital (WACC) that is
determined as an appropriate benchmark for a project IRR in paragraph 12 of the Guideline on the
Assessment of Investment Analysis version 05 (EB 62, Annex 5).
The WACC is obtained by proportionally weighing the cost of each component of the capital structure
(equity and debt), in a manner expressed mathematically by the following formula:
Equation 1

1

1

Table 4 : Input values and data sources for WACC

Parameter
Description
Value
Source
Equity portion in the
E
50%
Default value in the Guidelines
Guideline on the Assessment
project capital structure
of Investment Analysis version 05, paragraph 18
Debt portion in the project
D
50%
(EB 62, Annex 5).
capital structure

Cost of equity financing
Cost of debt before tax
29.02%
Determined as per Equation 2
11.52 %
Based on the Bank of Indonesias statistics for

bank lending rates in the period of 2010.
Economic Report on Indonesia, 2010 , Table 22,
page 191.
http://www.bi.go.id/NR/rdonlyres/9849E572http://www.bi.go.id/NR/rdonlyres/9849E572
B189-4082-A2725DB0ACA14F85/22727/09_lampiran1.pdf
WACC
Applicable corporate tax
25%
Indonesia Pocket Tax Book

ook 2010 ;
http://www.pwc.com/id/en/indonesian
http://www.pwc.com/id/en/indonesian-pocket-taxbook/assets/IndonesianPocketTaxBook2010.pdf
18.83
The cost of equity financing based on the CAPM

In accordance with international common practice, the cost of equity financing (ke) is determined using
the Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM) formulated as follows:
Equation 2

17

(CDM
- Version 03
CDM Executive Board
Table 5 : Input values and data sources for equity financing (ke)
Parameter Description
Value
Source/comment
/comment
Rf
Risk free rate

of return
8.38%
Average risk free rate in 2010. It is sourced

s
from the yield to
redemption of Indonesian government bonds are issued during
the period of 2000 to 2010, which is widely considered as a
proxy for the risk free rate of Indonesian market.
http://www.bi.go.id/web/id/Moneter/Obligasi+Negara/

Rpm
Beta
Equity
market risk
premium
1.0
20.64%
In view of the Additionality Tools emphasis on the importance

of parameters that are standard in the market (paragraph 29) and
the possibility that, in cooperation with the tapioca starch
factory, the equity for the Project can be provided by a company
belonging to any industry, the neutral beta of 1.0 is adopted.4
Based on 10-year historical
istorical data from 2001 to 2010 that
compares the performance of the Indonesian stock exchanges
index with the risk-free
ree rate of return.
return The market index data
gathered from fourth week December of each year available at
Government website :
http://www.bapepam.go.id/pasar_modal/publikasi_pm/statistik_
http://www.bapepam.go.id/pasar_modal/publikasi
pm/index.htm
country risk
premium

Cost of
equity
financing
29.02%
This factor is considered to have been included in the risk-free

rate of return that is based on Indonesian government bonds as
well as in the market risk premium derived from the local equity
market. To avoid double counting the risk, a value of 0 is
adopted.
For details of the WACC calculation, please refer to Benchmark spreadsheet

1.2 IRR Calculation
The financial attractiveness of the Project is determined by comparing the project IRR (without CER
revenue) with the WACC benchmark. As stated in Section A.4.2.2, att the time of preparing this version of
the PDD, the type of digester to be adopted for the Project has not been firmly decided. Thus, the IRRs
for both of covered lagoon and UASB are calculated for the Project.
1.2.1 IRR calculation for covered lagoon
Some registered project activities (for example ref. 4106) have relied on the CAPM applied to the Indonesian equity market in
combination with an industry beta value calculated
calculated in a study by New York University. With the same method of calculation, the
beta (unlevered) for the Project would be 2.37 assigned to the food processing industry by the said study since the Project is
developed within a tapioca factory company,
company therebyy raising the benchmark significantly. For the sake of conservatism, this
PDD does not follow the approach and instead chose a neutral beta of 1.0.
18

(CDM
- Version 03
CDM Executive Board
The result of IRR in the absence of CER revenue is 3.77%.

%. The following table
tab summarizes the Projects
IRR calculation, including all assumptions made.
Table 6 : Input values and data sources for Projects IRR calculation (Covered lagoon)
Input Parameters
Total capital investment costs

cost
Average Annual O&M costss

Annual saving from grid
displacement
Value
26,422,646,295
2,305,457,294
4,193,187,826
Unit
Source
IDR
Quotations from suppliers, previous

Quotation
experience plus 5%5 for inflation.
More details are provided in the IRR
spreadsheet
IDR
Information from technology providers
IDR
Calculated as the amount of grid

electricity import displaced by the
Project multiplied by the grid
electricity price
Project life
25
years
Information from technology provider
Depreciation
25
years
On basis of project life
25
Indonesia Pocket Tax Book 2010 ;

http://www.pwc.com/id/en/indonesianpocket-tax
taxbook/assets/IndonesianPocketTaxBook
2010.pdf
IRR without CER revenue
3.77
Calculated
IRR with CER revenue
22.08
Calculated
Income tax rate
In accordance with the benchmark analysis, if the financial indicator of a project is lower than the
benchmark, the project is not considered as financially attractive. As clearlyy shown in the table above, the
Project IRR without CER revenue is lower than the benchmark (18.83%). Therefore it is considered that
the Project is not financially attractive. With an IRR at 22.08%
% when the potential CER revenue is
included, the Projects IRR surpasses
surpass the benchmark.
1.2.2 IRR calculation for UASB
The result of IRR in the absence of CER revenue is 2.52%.
%. The following table summarizes the Projects
IRR calculation, including all assumptions made.
Inflation of 5% is lower in compared to Indonesias inflation rate between the previous experience and the Project, namely
between year 2007 and year 2010. Indonesias inflation rate is provided in Economic Report on Indonesia, 2010 , Table 28,
page 196.
http://www.bi.go.id/NR/rdonlyres/9849E572
http://www.bi.go.id/NR/rdonlyres/9849E572-B189-4082-A272-5DB0ACA14F85/22727/09_lampiran1.pdf
5DB0ACA14F85/22727/09_lampiran1.pdf
19

(CDM
- Version 03
CDM Executive Board
Table 7 : Input values and data sources for Projects IRR calculation (UASB)
Input Parameters
Value
Unit
Source
Total capital investment costs

cost
28,722,246,015
IDR
Average Annual O&M costss
2,438,674,306
IDR
Average Annual saving from grid

displacement
4,193,187,826
IDR
Project life
25
years
Quotations from suppliers, previous

Quotation
experience plus 5%6 for inflation.
More details are provided in the IRR
spreadsheet
Information from technology providers
Calculated as the amount of grid
electricity import displaced by the
Project multiplied
multipli by the grid
electricity price
Information from technology provider
Depreciation
25
years
On basis of project life
25
Indonesia Pocket Tax Book 2010 ;

http://www.pwc.com/id/en/indonesianpocket-tax
taxbook/assets/IndonesianPocketTaxBook
2010.pdf
IRR without CER revenue
2.52
Calculated
IRR with CER revenue
19.96
Calculated
Income tax rate
In accordance with the benchmark analysis, if the financial indicator of a project is lower than the
benchmark, the project is not considered as financially attractive. As clearlyy shown in the table above, the
Project IRR without CER revenue is lower than the benchmark (18.83%). Therefore
Therefor it is considered that
the Project is not financially attractive. With an IRR at 19.96%
% when the potential CER revenue is
included, the Projects IRR surpasses
surpass the benchmark
1.3 Sensitivity Analysis

In order to test the robustness of the assumptions made,
m
a sensitivity analysis is carried out as follows:
Table 8 : Input values and data sources for sensitivity analysis
Parameter
Capital investment costs
Variation of parameters
Decrease by 10 %
IRR result (%)

UASB
Covered lagoon
3.45
4.76
Inflation of 5% is lower in compared to Indonesias inflation rate between the previous experience and the Project,
namely between year 2007 and year 2010.
2010 Indonesias inflation rate is provided in Economic Report on Indonesia,
2010 , Table 28, page 196.
http://www.bi.go.id/NR/rdonlyres/9849E572
http://www.bi.go.id/NR/rdonlyres/9849E572-B189-4082-A272-5DB0ACA14F85/22727/09_lampiran1.pdf
5DB0ACA14F85/22727/09_lampiran1.pdf
20

(CDM
- Version 03
CDM Executive Board
O&M costs
Grid electricity displaced
Increase by 10 %
Decrease by 10 %
Increase by 10 %
Decrease by 10 %
Increase by 10 %
2.91
4.81
2.65
1.76
5.54
1.72
3.62
1.35
0.53
4.30
The sensitivity analysis demonstrates that after the parameter

parameter are sensitized by +/+/ 10%, the Projects IRR
remains below the benchmark.
It is noted that items of any significance for the total capital investment costs and annual O&M costs are
based either on quotations/contracts with technology providers or on the
the information provided by them.
The costs are unlikely to deviate more than 10% from the projections in the base case.
The amount of grid electricity displacement (saving that accrue from the Project) is dictated by the
demand for electricity at the tapioca
tapioca starch factory, which in turn is correlated to the production level at
the factory. The base case considered by this PDD corresponds to tapioca starch production at 81% of the
capacity. Thus, the sensitivity analysis with an increase of 10% means 89%
89% of the capacity for tapioca
starch production, which is extremely unlikely to be exceeded due to constraints on raw material
procurement. Historical data shows that in no year the actual production at the tapioca starch factory
surpassed this level. Thee scope of sensitivity analysis of 10% is deemed sufficient for this parameter.
For details of IRR calculation and the sensitivity analysis, please refer to IRR spreadsheet
2.
Prior Consideration and Ongoing Actions
According to the Guidance on the Demonstration

Demonstration and Assessment of Prior Consideration of the CDM
version 04 (EB 62, Annex 13), for project activities with a starting date on or after 02 August 2008, the
project participant must inform a Host Party DNA and the UNFCCC secretariat in writing of
o the
commencement of the project activity and of their intention to seek CDM status.
As the starting date of the Project was on 21 October 2011, project participants submitted a prior
consideration form to the UNFCCC Secretariat and Indonesian DNA on 31-Jan-12
31
and 02-Feb-12,
respectively.
Major ongoing actions to date are listed in the following table.
Date
Action
Note
Executed CDM consultancy agreement with
Agreement excerpt submitted to
14-Oct-11
Asiatica
DOE
21-Oct-11
Executed procurement agreement

agreeme for gas
engine with Navigat Energy
[Project Start Date]
Agreement excerpt submitted to

DOE
15-Dec-11
Stakeholder consultation session
Evidence including attendance list

and questionnaire responses
submitted to DOE.
31-Jan-12
Prior consideration form

for sent to UNFCCC
Secretariat
Email acknowledgement from

UNFCCC submitted to DOE
21

(CDM
- Version 03
CDM Executive Board
Date
02-Feb-12
Action
Prior consideration form sent to Indonesian
DNA
Note
Email acknowledgement from DNA
submitted to DOE
B.6. Emission Reductions :

B.6.1. Explanation of methodological choices:
c
In order to calculate emission reductions, the Project uses
use the following two methodologies:
methodolog
- AMS-III.H.
III.H. version 16;
- AMS-I.F.
I.F. version 02.
The two methodologies are delineated in the ensuing sections in relation to the Project
1. AMS-III.H.
III.H. component
roject applies technology consistent with paragraph 1 (f) of AMS-III.H.. version 16.0, introduction
This Project
of a sequential
ntial stage of wastewater treatment with biogas recovery and combustion, with or without
sludge treatment, to an anaerobic wastewater treatment
treatment system withoaut biogas recovery.
( y) is expressed as follows:
The calculation for emission reduction due to the wastewater treatment (ER
Equation 3
ERy = BEy (PEy + LEy)
Where
ERy
BEy
PEy
LEy
=
=
=
=
emission reduction in year y (t CO2e)

baseline emissions in year y (t
( CO2e)
project activity emissions in the year y (t CO2e)
leakage emission in the year y (t CO2e)
1.1 Baseline Emission, BEy

The baseline emission is expressed as:
Equation 4
BEy = BEpower,y + BEww,treatment,y + BEs,treatment,y + BEww,discharge,y + BEs,final,y
where:
BEy
BEpower,y
BEww,treatment,y
BEs,treatment,y
BEww,discharge,y
BEs,final,y
: Baseline emissions in year y (tCO2e)

: Baseline emissions from electricity or fuel consumption in year y (tCO2e)
: Baseline emissions of the wastewater treatment systems affected by the project
activity in year y (tCO 2e)
: Baseline emissions of the sludge treatment system affected by the project activity in
year y (tCO2e)
: Baseline
aseline methane emissions from degradable organic carbon in treated wastewater
discharged into sea/rive/lake in year y (tCO2e)
: Baseline methane emissions from anaerobic decay of the final sludge produced in
22

(CDM
- Version 03
CDM Executive Board
year y (tCO2e)
BEpower,y
The existing wastewater treatment facility relies primarily on the gravity for the flow of wastewater.
Thus, baseline emissions from electricity consumption or fossil fuel use (BEpower,y) referred to in
paragraph 19 of the methodology are small and excluded from
om ER calculation.
calculation This being a baseline
emission parameter, the exclusion, which applies to electricity consumption for all equipment/devices in
the baseline wastewater treatment facility,
facility is conservative.
BEww,treatment,y
Methane emissions from the baseline wastewater treatment systems affected by the project (BEww,treatment,y)
are determined using the methane generation potential of the wastewater treatment systems.
Equation 5

, !" # ,$
%&
,',$ ./01 23,',$ 4+56,78,' 9:,
'
!" # ,78,' 3,
;:78
)*+,Table 9: Input values and data sources for BEww,treatment,y

Parameter
Description
Value
Qww,i,y
Volume of wastewater treated
in the baseline wastewater
treatment system i in year y
- Year 1
734,563
734,563
- Year 2
- Year 3
734,563
734,563
- Year 4
- Year 5
734,563
- Year 6
734,563
- Year 7
734,563
Unit
m3
COD inf low,i,y
Chemical oxygen demand of

the wastewater inflow to the
baseline treatment system i in
year y
0.011817
ton
COD/m3
COD,BL,i
COD removal efficiency

effic
of the
baseline treatment system i
0.97
fraction
Bo,ww
Methane producing capacity of

the wastewater
0.25
kgCH4/kgC
OD
23
Source
For
ex-ante
calculation,
it
is
estimated based on
factor of 25 m3
wastewater
/
ton
tapioca
production.
Actual
experience
provided by other
BAJ's factory. Data is
available at UNFCCC
website, project ref
2673,
CER
spreadsheet for 1st
monitoring period.
For ex-ante calculation
it is estimated based on
1-year historical data
for the baseline
treatment system
Obtained from 1-year
historical data
as per paragraph 26 of
AMS-III.H. Version
16.0
IPCC, as per AMSIII.H. version 16.0

(CDM
- Version 03
CDM Executive Board
Parameter
MCFww,treatment,BL,i
Description
Methane correction factor for
baseline wastewater treatment
system i
Value
0.8
Unit
fraction
UFBL
Model correction factor to

account for model uncertainties
uncer
Global warming potential for
methane
0.89
fraction
GWPCH4
21
Source
Value for anaerobic
deep lagoon (depth
more than 2 meters) in
AMS-III.H. Version
16.0 table III.H.1.
Default value, AMSIII.H. version 16.0
AMS-III.H. version
16.0
BEs,treatment,
Emissions
missions from the baseline sludge treatment systems affected by the project activity are determined
using the methane generation potential of the sludge treatment systems:
systems
Equation 6
16

!" # ,<,$ % =>,72,,$ 9:<, !" # ,78,> .< ;:78 .A : D12 )*+,>
There is no sludge treatment in the baseline scenario. Therefore, Equation 6 is not taken into account in
baseline emission calculations.
BEww,discharge,y
Emissions from the degradable organic carbon
carbon in treated wastewater discharged in the baseline situation
are determined as follows.
Equation 7

,'<?@"!,$ &,$ )*+,- 3, ;:78 .,'<?@"!,78

9:
78,$
,78,'<?@"!
Table 10: Input values and data sources for BEww,discharge,y
Parameter
Description
Value
Qww,y
Volume of treated wastewater
discharged in year y in:
- Year 1
- Year 2
734,563
- Year 3
734,563
- Year 4
734,563
- Year 5
734,563
- Year 6
734,563
- Year 7
734,563
734,563
GWPCH4
Bo,ww
UFBL

methane
Methane producing capacity
of the wastewater
m3
21
0.25
kgCH4/kgC
OD
fraction
0.89
24
Unit
Source
For ex-ante calculation,
factor
of
25
m3
wastewater / ton tapioca
production.
Actual
experience provided by
other BAJ's factory.
Data is available at
UNFCCC
website,
project ref 2673, CER
spreadsheet
for
1st
monitoring period.
AMS-III.H. version
16.0
AMS-III.H. version

(CDM
- Version 03
CDM Executive Board
Parameter
CODww,dishcharge,BL,y
MCFww,BL,discharge
Description
account for model
uncertainities
COD of the treated
wastewater discharged into
sea, river or lake in the
baseline situation in the
th year
y
Methane correction factor
based on discharge pathway in
the baseline situation (e.g into
sea,river or lake) of
o the waste
water (fraction)
Value
Unit
Source
16.0
0.000088
t COD/m3
Based on 1-year
historical data for the
treated wastewater
discharged
0.1
fraction
Value for discharge of

water to sea, river or
lake in AMS-III.H.
Version 16.0 table
III.H.1.
BEs,final,y,
Final sludge is used for soil application. In accordance with paragraph 18 of the methodology, this term
is neglected.
1. 2. Projectt Activity Emissions, PEy
The project emission is expressed as:
Equation 8
*
$ E*
3!,$ F *
, !" # ,$ *
<, !" # ,$ *
,'<?

*
'<?@"!,$
<,'#"2,$
F
*
G' 'H,$
'H *
I'3"<<,$ *
2"!'#,$ J
PEy
PEpower,y
PEww,treatment,y
:
:
:
PEs,treatment,y
PEww,discharge,y :
PEs,final,y
:
PEfugitive,y
PE flaring,y
PE biomass,y
:
:
:
projectt activity emissions in the year y (tCO2e)

emissions from electricity or diesel consumption in the year y (tCO2e)
emissions from wastewater treatment affected by the project,
project and not equipped with
biogas recovery in the year
y y (tCO2e)
emissions from sludge treatment system affected by the project activity and not
equipped with biogas recovery in the year y(tCO2e)
emissions from degradable organic carbon in treated wastewater
astewater in year y (tCO2e)
emissions from the anaerobic decay of the final sludge generated by the project
activity treatment system in the year y (tCO2e)
emissions from biogas release in capture systems in the year y (tCO2e)
emissions due to incomplete flaring in the year y (tCO2e)
emissions from biomass
biomas stored under anaerobic conditions which doesn't take place in
the baseline situation (tCO2e).
PEpower,y
This parameter pertains to energy consumption for all equipment/devices used in the project activity.
PEpower,y shall be calculated as as per paragraph 29 of the methodology and determined as per the
procedure described in the Tool
to calculate project or leakage CO2 emissions from fossil fuel

combustion,
on, version 02 and Tool
Tool to calculate baseline, project and/or leakage emission from electricity
consumption, version 01,, based on the data collected in monitoring. It is shown in Equation 9 below.
Equation 9
PEpower,y = (ECPJ,grid,y* EFCO2,grid ) + (FCPJ_digester,diesel,* diesel * NCVdiesel * EFCO2,diesel)
25

(CDM
- Version 03
CDM Executive Board
Table 11: Input values and data sources for PEpower,y

Parameter
Description
Value
Unit
ECPJ,grid,y
Quantity of electricity
0
MWh
consumed by the project
electricity consumption
source grid in year y
EFCO2,grid
Emissions
missions factor for grid 0.743
t CO2/MWh
FCPJ_digester,diesel
,
diesel
NCVdiesel
EFCO2,diesel
Amount of fossil fuel

(diesel) consumed by
the Project activity
facilities for AMS-III.H
AMS
component.
Density of diesel fuel
Net calorific of diesel

fuel
Emissions
missions factor of
diesel fuel
Liter
0.92
kg/l
43.3
MJ/kg
74.8
tCO2/TJ
Source
For ex ante calculation, it is
assumed 0.
Indonesia DNA,with
DNA,
the data
available at:
http://pasarkarbon.dnpi.go.id/web/i
ndex.php/dnacdm/read/14/emission
-factors--for-sumatera-and-jamaligrid-2008.html
2008.html
Please refer to Annex 3 for details.
assumed 0.
National data , with the data

da
available at :
http://www.pertamina.com/index.p
hp/detail/read/minyak
hp/detail/read/minyak-diesel
IPCC Table 1.2, Chapter 1,
Introduction
IPCC 2006, Volume 2 , Table 1.4
It is noted that the Projects design is such that all the electricity consumed for the sake of the Project is
supplied by the Project itself under normal circumstances. The parameter ECPJ,grid,y is relevant only when
the electricity consumed by the digester operation (EC
( PJ,y) exceeds the electricity generated by the Project
(EGgenerated,y), a net amount after considering
cons ring the parasitic consumption related to power generation.
generation
ECPJ,grid,y will be 0 when EGgenerated,y > ECPJ,yand
ECPJ,y- EGgenerated,y when EGgenerated,y < ECPJ,y
The latter case will be extremely
mely rare. ECPJ,,grid,y and therefore PE power,y are assumed to be zero in the ex
ante calculation in the PDD.
PEww,treatment,y
Methane emissions from wastewater treatment systems affected by the project activity, and not equipped
with biogas recovery in the project situation,
situation are calculated as follows.
Equation 10
*
, !" # ,$
% &,$$ ./01 23,KL,$ 4,+56,MN,KL 9:,
K
)*+,-
26
!" # ,MN,KL
3, ;:MN

(CDM
- Version 03
CDM Executive Board
Table 12: Input values and data sources for PEww,treatment,y

Parameter
Description
Value
Qww,y
Volume of wastewater
treated in year y in:
- Year 1
734,563
- Year 2
734,563
- Year 3
734,563
- Year 4
734,563
- Year 5
734,563
734,563
- Year 6
734,563
- Year 7
t COD/m3
Chemical Oxygen
Demand removal
efficiency of the project
system k2 in year y
0.95
Fraction
Methane producing
capacity of the
wastewater
Methane correction factor
for project wastewater
treatment system k2
(secondary treatment)
account for model
mode
uncertainties
Global warming potential
for methane
0.25
kgCH4/kgC
OD
0.8
fraction
1.12
fraction
21
Chemical oxygen
oxyge demand
of the wastewater inflow
to the project waste water
treatment system k2 in the
year y
COD,PJ,k2
Bo,ww
UFPJ
GWPCH4
m3
0.001773
COD inf low,k2,y
MCFww,treatment,PJ,k2
Unit
Source
For ex-ante
ex
calculation, it is
estimated based on factor of
25 m3 wastewater / ton
tapioca production. Actual
experience provided by other
BAJ's factory. Data is
available
at
UNFCCC
website, project ref 2673,
CER spreadsheet for 1st
monitoring period.
Monitored as CODww,treated,y.
For ex-ante
ex
calculation the
value is estimated based on
the design COD removal
ratio of the digester to be
in
installed.
Calculated based on inflow
COD (CODww,treated,y) and
outflow COD
(CODww,discharge,PJ,y) in the
second
secondary
treatment system,
both of which
wh will be
monitored. For ex ante
calculation, the estimated
values for the parameters are
used as the basis of
calculation.
IPCC, as per AMS-III.H.
AMS
version 16.0
Value for anaerobic deep
V
lagoon (depth more than 2
meters) in AMS-III.H.
version 16.0,
1
table III.H.1.
D
Default
value, AMS-III.H.
version 16.0
AMS
AMS-III.H.
version 16.0
PEs,treatment,y
Methane emissions from sludge treatment systems affected by the project activity, and not equipped with
biogas recovery in the project situation
Equation 11
27

(CDM
- Version 03
CDM Executive Board
*
<,
!" # ,$
% =2,MN
MN,$ 9:<,
>
!" # ,2
.< ;:MN .A : 16D12 )*+,-
There is no sludge treatment in the Project activity. Therefore, Equation 11 is not taken into account in
project emission calculations.
PEww,discharge,y
Methane emissions from degradable organic carbon in treated wastewater are calculated as follows.
Equation 12
*
,'<?@"!,$ &,$ )*+,- 3, ;:MN .,'<?@"!,MN
MN,$ 9:,MN,'<?@"!
Table 13: Input values and data sources for PEww,discharge,y
Parameter
Description
Value
Qww,y
Volume of treated
wastewater in year y in:
734,563
- Year 1
- Year 2
734,563
- Year 3
734,563
- Year 4
734,563
- Year 5
734,563
- Year 6
734,563
- Year 7
734,563
GWPCH4
Bo,ww
UFPJ
CODww,dishcharge,PJ,y
MCFww,,PJ,discharge

methane
of the wastewater
account for model
uncertainties
COD of the treated
wastewater discharged into
sea, river or lake in the
project situation in year y
Methane
ethane correction factor
based on discharge pathway
in the project situation (e.g
into sea,river,or lake) of the
waste water
Unit
m3
21
t CO2/ tCH4
0.25
kgCH4/kgC
OD
fraction
1.12
0.000088
0.1
Source
factor
of
25
m3
production.
Actual
UNFCCC
website,
spreadsheet
for
1st
monitoring period.
AMS-III.H. version
16.0
AMS-III.H. version
16.0
tCOD/m3
For ex-ante calculation

it is estimated to be the
same as in the baseline.
fraction
Value for discharge of

water to sea, river or
lake in AMS-III.H.
Version 16.0 table
III.H.1.
PEs,final,y
Methane emissions from anaerobic decay of
o the final sludge produced are calculated as follows.
28

(CDM
- Version 03
CDM Executive Board
Equation 13
16D )*
*
<,'#"2,$ ='#"2,MN
MN,$ .< ;:MN 9:<,MN,'#"2 .A :
+,12
However, iff the final sludge is controlled combusted, disposed in a landfill with biogas recovery, or used
for soil application in aerobic condition, paragraph 29 of AMS-III.H.version
AMS III.H.version 16.0 stipulates that this term
shall be neglected, and the sludge treatment and/or use and/or final disposal shall be monitored during the
crediting period with the following revised definition of the parameters:
- MCFs,PJ,final : Methane correction factor of the disposal site that receives the final sludge in the
project situation, estimated as per the procedures described in the .Tool to determine methane
emissions avoided from disposal
disposal of waste at a solid waste disposal site.
- Sfinal,PJ,y Amount of dry matter in final sludge generated by the project wastewater treatment
systems in the year y (t)
PEfugitive,y
Methane emissions from biogas release in capture systems are calculated as follows.
*
G'
Where
PEfugitive,ww,y
PEfugitive,s,y
'H,$
*
G'
'H,,$
*
G'
Equation 14
'H,<,$
= Fugitive emissions through capture inefficiencies in the anaerobic wastewater treatment

system in the year y (tCO2 e)
= Fugitive
ve emissions through capture inefficiencies in the anaerobic sludge treatment
system in the year y (tCO2 e)
Formula to calculate PEfugitive,ww,y is shown in Equation 15

*
G'
'H
'H,,$
1 :
9
*,
!" # ,$
)*+,-
Equation 15
Where
MEPww,treatment,y = methane emission potential of the wastewater
w
treatment system equipped with biogas
recovery system in the year y (ton CH4/year) and expressed as per Equation 16.
16
Equation 16
9
*,
!" # ,$
&,$ 3, ;:MN % .!3H,MN,K,$ 9:,

O
!" # ,MN,K
Table 14 : Input values and data sources for MEP,ww,treatment,y and PEfugitive,ww,y
Parameter
Description
Value
Unit
Source
Qww,y
Volume of wastewater
m3
treated in system k in year y
in:
factor
of
25
m3
- Year 1
734,563
- Year 2
734,563
production.
Actual
- Year
ear 3
734,563
- Year 4
734,563
- Year 5
734,563
29

(CDM
- Version 03
CDM Executive Board
- Year 6
- Year 7
Bo,ww
UFPJ
COD removed,PJ,k,y
MCFww,treatment,PJ,k
CFEww
734,563
734,563

of the wastewater
account for model
mo
uncertainties
COD removed by the
treatment system k of the
project activity equipped
with biogas recovery in the
year y
0.25
Methane correction factor for

the waste
aste water treatment
system k equipped with
biogas recovery equipment
Capture efficiency of the
biogas recovery equipment in
the wastewater treatment
systems
1.12
kgCH4/kg
COD
fraction
0.010044
t COD/m3
0.8
fraction
0.9
fraction
UNFCCC
website,
spreadsheet
for
1st
monitoring period.
AMS-III.H. version 16.0
Calculated by using
project digester COD
treatment efficiency of
85% and COD content
of the waste water
inflow
Default value for
anaerobic reactor in
AMS-III.H. version 16.0
table III.H.1.
As per AMS-III.H.
version 16.0
Formula to calculate PEfugitive,s,y is shown in

Equation 17
*
G'
'H
'H,<,$
1 :
< 9
*<,
!" # ,$
)*+,-
Equation 17
There is no sludge treatment system in the Project activity and hence

Equation 17 shall be neglected.
PE flaring,y
Project emissions from flaring of the residual gas stream
st eam are calculated based on the flare efficiency and
the mass flow rate of methane in the residual gas stream that is flared.These
flare These emissions are calculated as
per the Tool to determine project emissions
emis
from flaring gases containing methane,
methane EB 28 Meeting
Report, Annex 13 (Flaring Tool).
Tool) According to the Flaring Tool,
ool, the quantity of methane in the residual
gas is calculated using the Equation 18, whereas the amount of emission from flaring is calculated using
the Equation 19
Equation 18
TMRG,h = FVRG,h * fvCH4,RG,h * CH4,n
Equation 19
RSTU
*
2"!,$
2"! % 9PQ,@ 1 42"!,@
@VW
30
)*+,+,
1000

(CDM
- Version 03
CDM Executive Board
Table 15: Input values and data sources for PE flaring,y

Parameter
Description
Value
FVRG,h
Volumetric flow rate of
the residual gas in dry
basiss at normal condition
in hour h
fvCH4,RG,h
Volumetric fraction of
methane in the residual
gas on dry basis in hour h
CH4,n
Density of methane gas at
0.716
normal conditions
TMRG,h
Mass flow rate of
methane in the residual
gas in the hour h
- Year 1
281
- Year 2
281
- Year 3
281
- Year 4
281
- Year 5
281
- Year 6
281
- Year 7
281
Unit
m3/h
Source
This parameter is not relevant for
the purpose of the ex ante
estimation.
This parameter is not relevant for

the purpose of the ex ante
estimation.
Flaring tool, EB28, Annex 13
Kg/m3
tCH4/yr
The values are for the purposes of

ex ante calculation and have been
estimated based on projected
supply (extraction) of methane
and the demand for it for captive
power generation. For ex post
calculation, the value will be
calculated from BGflaring and
wCH4, both of which will be
monitored.
Default value for Open flares as
per Tool to determine project
emission from flaring gases
containing methane
AMS-III.H.
III.H. version 16.0
flare
Flare efficiency in hour h
0.5
fraction
GWPCH4
Global warming potential

for methane
21
PE biomass,y
There is no biomass to be stored
store under anaerobic conditions on the account of the Project activity.
activity Hence
emissions from biomass, PE biomass,y shall be neglected.
1.3. Leakage
Given that the Project does not use equipment transferred from another activity, leakage
l
effects need not
be considered.
1.4. Emission Reduction

In accordance with paragraph 34 of AMS-III.H.
AMS
version16.0, emission reductions achieved in any year
are determined ex post as the lowest value of the following:
Equation 20
ERy ,ex post = min ((BEy ,ex post PEy ,ex post LEy ,ex post),(MDy PE power,y PEbiomass,y LEy ,ex post ))
31

(CDM
- Version 03
CDM Executive Board
Where:
ERy ,ex post
BEy ,ex post
PEy ,ex post

MDy
:
:
Emission reductions achieved by the project activity based on monitored values for year
y (tCO2e)
Baseline emissions calculated as per paragraph 16 using ex post monitored values
(tCO2e)
Project emissions calculated using ex post monitored values (tCO2e)
Methane captured and destroyed/gainfully used by the project activity
acti
in the year
(tCO2e)
In accordance with paragraph 35 of AMS-III.H. version16, MDy will bee measured using the conditions of
the flaring process:
Equation 21
MDy = BGburnt,y *wCH4,y * CH4 *FE *GWPCH4
Where:
BGburnt,y
: Biogas
gas flared/combusted in year y
wCH4,y
: Methane content of the biogas in the year y
CH4
: Density of methane at the temperature and pressure of the biogas in the year y
FE
: Flare efficiency in year y (fraction). If the biogas is combusted for gainful purposes, e.g.
fed to an engine, an efficiency of 100% may be applied
Pursuant to paragraph 32 of the methodology, emission reductions are estimated ex ante in Section
B.6.3of this PDD.
2. AMS-I.F. component
This Project applies technology consistent with paragraph 1 of AMS.I.F.
F. version 02.0, The project
activity will displace electricity from an electricity system that is supplied from a national grid.
grid.
The method of calculation of emission reduction is described in the ensuing section
ections.
2.1. Baselinee Emissions (BEy)
As per paragraph 14 of AMS.I.F. version 02.0, the baseline emissions
emission for electricity produced shall be
calculated as follows:
Equation 22
BEy
where :
BEy
EGBL,y
:
:
EFCO2,grid
= EGBL,y * EFCO2,grid
Emissions in the baseline in

i year y (tCO2e)
Quantity of net grid electricity displaces a result of the implementation of the CDM
project activity (MWh)
Emissions
missions factor for grid (tCO2/MWh)
Table 16: Input values and data sources for

f BEy component
Parameter
Description
Value
Unit
EGBL,y
Quantity of net grid
MWh
electricity displaced in year
y
32
Source
Calculated as the difference
differen between
EGgenerated,y,y and ECPJ,y. The value will
be 0 when ECPJ,y is equal to or

(CDM
- Version 03
CDM Executive Board
EFCO2,grid
- Year 1
- Year 2
- Year 3
- Year 4
- Year 5
- Year 6
- Year 7
5,690
5,690
5,690
5,690
5,690
5,690
5,690
Emissions
missions factor for grid
0.743
tCO2/M
Wh
greater than EGgenerated,y.

For ex-ante
ante calculation, the values
are estimated based on factor of 0.2
MWh of electricity demand / ton
tapioca production. It has been
confirmed
irmed that the Project will
provide sufficient biogas to generate
the projected amounts of electricity.
Indonesia DNA,with
DNA,
the data
available at:
http://pasarkarbon.dnpi.go.id/web/in
dex.php/dnacdm/read/14/emission
dex.php/dnacdm/read/14/emissionfactors-for
for-sumatera-and-jamaligrid-2008.html
2008.html
Please refer to Annex 3 for details.
Grid Emission Factor

The gridd emission factor is calculated as a combined margin emission factor (EFgrid,CM) consisting of the
combination of operating margin (EFgrid, OM) and build margin (EFgrid, BM) emission factors calculated
according to the six steps defined in the latest version
versi of the Tool
Tool to calculate the emission factor for an
electricity system (version 022.2.1) (hereafter referred to as the EF tool). The EF tool determines the
CO2 emission factor of an electricity system as follows:
Step 1: Identify the relevant electricity
electr
systems.
According to PLNs actual grid structure, Sumatera grid covers NAD Province, North Sumatera Province,
Riau Province, Jambi Province, West Sumatera Province, South Sumatera Province and Lampung
Province. The project activity is located in Lampung
Lampung province which is covered by Sumatera Power Grid.
Thus, the relevant electric power system is Sumatera Power Grid.
Step 2: Choose whether to include off-grid
off grid power plants in the project electricity system (optional).
Option I is chosen in this calculation
calcul
which includes only grid power plants.
Step 3: Select a method to determine the operating margin (OM).
The Tool to calculate the emission factor for an electricity system Version 02 offers four methods to
calculate the operating margin (OM):
a. Simple OM; or
b. Simple adjusted OM; or
c. Dispatch data analysis OM; or
d. Average OM
Pursuant to the specific data in Annex 3,
3 the low-cost/ must-run
run resources in Sumatera grid accounted for
less than 50% of the total amount in the Sumatera grid. Accordingly,
According , the simple OM method is selected
for calculating the emission factor.
The ex-ante option is chosen,, using a 3-year generation-weighted
weighted average, based on the most recent data
available at the time of submission of the CDM-PDD
CDM PDD to the DOE for validation.
Step 4: Calculate the operating margin emission factor according to the selected method.
The simple OM emission factor is calculated as the generation-weighted
generation weighted average CO2 emissions per unit
net electricity generation (tCO2/MWh) of all generating power plants serving the system, not including
33

(CDM
- Version 03
CDM Executive Board
low-cost/ must-run
run power plants/units. The simple OM may be calculated by choosing one of these below
two options:
Option A :
Based on the net electricity generation and a CO2 emission factor of each power unit; or
Option B:
Based on the total net electricity generation of all power plants serving the system and
the fuel types and total fuel consumption of the project electricity system.
Option B can only be used if:
(a) The necessary data for option A is not available;
available and
(b) Only nuclear and renewable power generation are considered as low-cost/
low
must-run power
sources and the quantity of electricity supplied to the grid by these sources is known; and
(c) Off-grid
grid power plants are not included in the calculation (i.e., if Option
Option I has been chosen in Step
2).
The calculation of the simple OM emission factor uses option B, whose prerequisites (a), (b) and (c)
above are all met by the Project. Thus, the
he simple OM emission factor is calculated based on the net
electricity supplied
plied to the grid by all power plants serving the system, not including low-cost/
low
must-run
power plants/units, and based on the fuel type(s) and total fuel consumption of the project electricity
system, as follows :
Where:
' :',$ Z [\',$ Z
:+5L,',$
:!',5Y <'2,$
)$
EFgrid, OM simple, y
FCi,y
=
=
NCVi,y
EFCO2,i,y
EGy
=
=
Simple operating margin CO2 emission factor in year y (tCO2/MWh)

Amounts of fossil fuel type i consumed in the project electricity system
in year y (Mass or volume unit)
Net calorific value (energy content) of fossil fuel type i in year y (GJ/
mass or volume unit)
CO2 emission factor of fossil fuel type i in year y (tCO2/GJ)
Net electricity generated andd delivered to the grid by all power sources
serving the system, not including low-cost/
cost/ must-run
must
power plants/
units, in year y (MWh)
All fossil fuel types combusted in power sources in the project electricity
system in year y
The relevant
ant year as per the data vintage chosen in step 3
The detailed calculation of the operating margin emission factor is shown in Annex 3.
Step 5:: Calculate the build margin (BM) emission factor
In terms of the vintage of data, the EF tool allows project participants to choose one of the following two
options:
Option 1:: For the first crediting period, calculate the build margin emission factor ex ante based on the
most recent information available on units already built for sample group m at the time of CDM-PDD
submission to the DOE for validation. For the second crediting period, the build margin emission factor
should be updated based on the most recent information available on units already built at the time of
submission of the request for renewal of the
the crediting period to the DOE. For the third crediting period,
the build margin emission factor calculated for the second crediting period should be used. This option
does not require monitoring the emission factor during the crediting period.
Option 2: For
or the first crediting period, the build margin emission factor shall be updated annually, ex
post,, including those units built up to the year of registration of the project activity or, if information up to
34

(CDM
- Version 03
CDM Executive Board
the year of registration is not yet available, including

including those units built up to the latest year for which
information is available. For the second crediting period, the build margin emissions factor shall be
calculated ex ante,, as described in Option 1 above. For the third crediting period, the build margin
m
emission factor calculated for the second crediting period should be used.
Option 1 is chosen by the project participant in terms of the vintage of data.
Identify the group of power units to be included in the build margin (BM).
The sample group of power units m used to calculate the build margin for the Project is determined to be
SET20% as defined in the EF tool, considering that:
that
(a) SET20% represents a larger amount of generation than SET5-unit; and
(b) None of the power plants in SET20% started to supply electricity more than 10 years ago.
Calculate the build margin emission factor.
Thee build margin emission factor is the generation-weighted
generation weighted average emission factor (tCO2/MWh) of all
power units m during the most recent year y for which power generation data is available, calculated as
follows:

),$ Z
:]8,,$
:!',7Y,$

),$
Where:
EFgrid,BM,y
EGm,y
=
=
EFEL,m,y
m
y
=
=
=
Build margin CO2 emission factor in year y (tCO2/MWh)

et quantity of electricity generated and delivered to the grid by power unit m In
year y (MWh)
CO2 emission
emis
factor of power unit m in year y (tCO2/MWh)
Power units included in the build margin
Most recent historical year for which power generation data is available
Detailed calculation of the build margin emission factor is shown in Annex 3.

Step 6: Calculate the combined margin (CM) emissions factor.
The combined margin emission factor has been estimated as a weighted average of the OM and BM.
EFgrid,CM,y
= (EFgrid,OM,y * wOM) + (EFgrid,BM,y * wBM)
with wOM and wBM both being 0.5.
Detailed calculation of the combined margin emission factor is shown in Annex 3.
2.2. Project Emissions

In accordance with paragraph 20 of AMS-I.F version 02, CO2 emissions from on-site
on
consumption of
fossil fuels due to the project activity (PEfossil_fuel,y) must be calculated using the Tool to calculate project
or leakage CO2 emissions from fossil fuel combustion (Version 02). It is expected that the project
activity does not involve any fossil fuel consumption.
PEfossil_fuel,y shall be calculated as follows
fol
:
Equation 23
PEfossil_fuel,y = FCPJ_gas_engine,diesel,y * diesel * NCVdiesel * EFCO2,diesel
35

(CDM
- Version 03
CDM Executive Board
Table 17: Input values and data sources for PEfossil_fuel,y

Parameter
Description
Value
Unit
FCPJ_gas_engine,die Amount of fossil fuel
0
Liter
(diesel) consumed by
sel,y
the Project activity
facilities for AMS-I.F
AMS
component
diesel
0.92
kg/l
Source
assumed 0.
National data , with the data

available at :
http://www.pertamina.com/index.p
hp/detail/read/minyak
hp/detail/read/minyak-diesel
NCVdiesel
Net calorific of diesel

fuel
43.3
MJ/kg
IPCC Table 1.2, Chapter 1,

Introduction
EFCO2,diesel
Emissions
missions factor
fa
for
diesel fuel
74.8
tCO2/TJ
9 except for the difference

It is noted that Equation 23 is identical to the second term of Equation 9,
between FCPJ_digester,diesel,y and FCPJ_gas_engine,diesel,y. For practical purposes, monitoring of parameters
FCPJ_digester,diesel,y and FCPJ_gas_engine,diesel,y can be combined as specified in the comment for ID 21 of section
B.7.1.
2.3. Leakage
The Project
ect does not involve a transfer of energy generating equipment from another activity. Leakage
shall be zero.
2.4. Emission Reductions
Emission reductions are calculated as follows :
Equation 24
ERy = BEy PEy - LEy)
Where :
ERy
= emission reductions in year y (t CO2e)
BEy
= baseline emissions in year y (t
( CO2e)
PEy
= project
roject activity emissions in the year y (t CO2e)
LEy
= leakage emissionin
in the year y (t
( CO2e)
3. Overall emission reductions of the project activity
The overalll emission reductions of the Project activity are calculated ex-ante
ante as the sum of the results
obtained in the AMS-III.H. component and the AMS-I.F. component as follows:
Equation 25
ERy = ERAMS-III.H,y + ERAMS-I.F,y
36

(CDM
- Version 03
CDM Executive Board
B.6.2. Data and parameters that are available at validation:

Data / Parameter:
Data unit:
Description:
Source of data used:
Value applied:
Justification of the
choice of data or
description of
measurement methods
and procedures actually
applied :
Any comment:
Fraction
Methane correction factor for baseline wastewater treatment system (fraction)
AMS
AMS-III.H.
version 16.0 table III.H.1
0.8
From the mills design data, the depths of the anaerobic lagoons
lagoon are 8-9 meters
which falls into the type of anaerobic
anaerobic deep lagoon (depth more than 2 meters)
Data / Parameter:
Data unit:
Description:
MCFww,BL,discharge
Fraction
Methane correction factor based on discharge pathway in the baseline situation
(e.g into sea,rive or lake) of the wastewater
wastewa
AMS
AMS-III.H.
version 16.0
0.1
Value for discharge of water to sea, river or lake in AMS-III.H.
AMS
Version 16.0
table III.H.1.
III.H.

Value applied:
choice of data or
description of
measurement methods
applied :
Any comment:
Data / Parameter:
Data unit:
Description:
Fraction
Methane correction factor for Project wastewater treatment system k (secondary
treatment)
AMS
AMS-III.H.
version 16.0
0.8
Value
alue for anaerobic deep lagoon (depth
depth more than 2 meters) in AMS-III.H.
version 16.0,
1
table III.H.1.

Value applied:
choice of data or
description of
measurement methods
Depth of the existing anaerobic lagoons,
lagoons, which will continue to be used as the
and procedures actually secondary treatment system, will remain over 2 meters after the Projects
applied :
implementation.
Any comment:
37

(CDM
- Version 03
CDM Executive Board
Data / Parameter:
Data unit:
Description:
MCFww,PJ,discharge
Fraction
Methane
ethane correction factor based
based on discharge pathway in the project situation
(e.g into sea,river,or lake) of the waste water
AMS
AMS-III.H.
version 16.0
0.1
Value for discharge of water to sea, river or lake in AMS-III.H.
AMS
Version 16.0
table III.H.1.
III.H.

Value applied:
choice of data or
description of
measurement methods
applied :
Any comment:
Data / Parameter:
Data unit:
Description:
Fraction
Methane correction factor for the waste
w
water treatment
atment system k equipped
with biogas recovery equipment
AMS
AMS-III.H.
version 16.0
0.8
Default value for anaerobic
anaerob reactor in AMS-III.H.
III.H. version 16.0 table III.H.1.
III.H.

Value applied:
choice of data or
description of
measurement methods
applied :
Any comment:
Data / Parameter:
Data unit:
Description:
Value applied:
choice of data or
description of
measurement methods
applied :
Any comment:
COD,BL,i
Fraction
COD removal efficiency of the baseline treatment system i
BAJ
0.97
Based on 1-year
1
historical record
Data / Parameter:
Data unit:
Description:
Value applied:
choice of data or
CH4
Kg/m3
Densit of methane gas at normal conditions
Density
Flaring tool, EB28, Annex 13
0.716
Default value
To be used in the ex ante and ex post calculations
38

(CDM
- Version 03
CDM Executive Board
description of
measurement methods
applied :
Any comment:
Data / Parameter:
Data unit:
Description:
Value applied:
choice of data or
description of
measurement methods
applied :
Any comment:
Data / Parameter:
Data unit:
Description:
Value applied:
choice of data or
description of
measurement methods
applied :
Any comment:
NCVdiesel
MJ/kg
Net calorific of diesel fuel
IPCC Table 1.2, Chapter 1, Introduction
43.3
Default value
diesel
kg/l
National data (http://www.pertamina.com/index.php/detail/read/minyak-diesel)
(http://www.pertamina.com/index.php/detail/read/minyak
0.92
Upper value
Data / Parameter:
Data unit:
Description:
Value applied:
choice of data or
description of
measurement methods
applied :
Any comment:
EFCO2,diesel
tCO2/tJ
Emissions
missions factor for diesel fuel
74.8
Default value
Data / Parameter:
Data unit:
Description:
EFCO2,grid
tCO2/MWh
Emissions
missions factor for grid
39

(CDM
- Version 03
CDM Executive Board
Indonesia DNA,with
DNA,
the data available at:
http://pasarkarbon.dnpi.go.id/web/index.php/dnacdm/read/14/faktor-emisihttp://pasarkarbon.dnpi.go.id/web/index.php/dnacdm/read/14/faktor
jaringan
jaringan-listrik-sumatera-dan-jamali-2008.html
Grid calculation published by Department of Energy and Mineral Resources of
Indonesia - Directorate General of Electricity and Energy Utilization and
endorsed by the Indonesia
donesia DNA on 19 January 2009. Please refer to Annex 3
for details.
0.743
743
Emission factor for Sumatra grid. Calculated with Tool to calculate the
emission factor for an electricity system
version 2.2.1.
Value applied:
choice of data or
description of
measurement methods
applied :
Any comment:
The ex ante option as specified in the Tool to calculate the emission factor for
an electricity system version 2.2.1 is chosen.
Data / Parameter:
Data unit:
Description:
Value applied:
choice of data or
description of
measurement methods
applied :
Any comment:
EFgrid,OM,y
tCO2/MWh
Operating margin CO2 emission factor in year y
Calculated
0.906
Calculate using the latest available data
Calculated
EFgrid,BM,y
tCO2/MWh
Build margin CO2 emission factor in year y
Calculated
0.581
Calculated using the latest available data
Data / Parameter:
Data unit:
Description:
Value applied:
choice of data or
description of
measurement methods
applied :
Any comment:
Data / Parameter:
Data unit:
Description:
Value applied:
Bo,ww
kg CH4/kg COD
Methane producing capacity of the wastewater
AMS III.H version 16
0.25
40

(CDM
- Version 03
CDM Executive Board
IPCC default value
choice of data or
description of
measurement methods
applied :
Any comment:
Data / Parameter:
Data unit:
Description:
DOCs
Degradable organic
organic content of the untreated sludge generated in the year y
(fraction, dry basis)
0.257
IPCC default value for industrial sludge

Value applied:
choice of data or
description of
measurement methods
applied :
Any comment:
Data / Parameter:
Data unit:
Description:
Value applied:
choice of data or
description of
measurement methods
applied :
Any comment:
DOCF
Fraction of DOC dissimilated to biogas
0.5
IPCC default value
Data / Parameter:
Data unit:
Description:
Value applied:
choice of data or
description of
measurement methods
applied :
Any comment:
F
Fraction of CH4 in biogas
0.5
IPCC default value
41

(CDM
- Version 03
CDM Executive Board
As per the guidance provided in guidelines for completing the CDM-SSC-PDD,

PDD, version 05
0 Data that is
calculated with equations
ons provided in the approved categoryor
category default values specified in the category
should not be included in the compilation.
compilation Such data are: GWP CH4, UFBL, UFPJ, CFEww wOM, and wBM.
B.6.3
Ex-ante
ante calculation of emission reductions:
1. AMS-III.H component
1.1. Baseline Emission,BEy
BEy,power
Baseline emissions from electricity consumption or fossil fuel use (BE
BEpower,y = 0 This is conservative.
power,y)
are small , and hence
BEww,treatment,y

,
!" # ,$
%&,',,$ ./01 23,',$ 4+56,78,' 9:,

'
!" # ,78,'
3, ;:78
)*+,-
Parameter
Qww,i,y
COD inf low,i,y
COD,BL,i
Bo,ww
UFBL
GWPCH4
BEww,treatment,y
Value
ue
734,563
0.011817
0.97
0.8
0.2
0.25
0.89
89
21
31,474
Unit
3
m
ton COD/m3
fraction
fraction
kgCH4/kgCOD
Fraction
ton CO2e/year
BEs,treatment,y
There is no sludge
ge treatment system in the baseline scenario and hence BEs,treatment,y = 0
BEww,discharge,y

,'<?@"!,$ &,$ )*+,- 3, ;:78 .,'<?@"!,78
78,$ 9:,78,'<?@"!
Parameter
Qww,y
GWPCH4
Bo,ww
UFBL
Value
734,563
21
0.25
0.89
Unit
m3
kgCH4/kgCOD
Fraction
42

(CDM
- Version 03
CDM Executive Board
CODww,dishcharge,BL,y
MCFww,BL,discharge
BEww,discharge,y
0.000088
0.1
30
ton COD/m3
Fraction
ton CO2e /year
BEs,final,y
Final sludge is used for soil application. In accordance with paragraph 18 of the methodology, this term
is neglected.
BEww,y
Calculation results for baseline emissions
emission are shown in Table 18
Table 18: Calculation results for baseline emissions
Parameter
Value
Unit
BEpower,y
0
tCO2e per year
BEww,treatment,y
31,474
tCO2e per year
BEs,treatment,y
0
tCO2e per year
BEww,discharge,y
30
tCO2e per year
BEs,final,y
0
tCO2e per year
BEy
31,504
tCO2e per year
1.2 Project Activity Emissions, PEy

*
$ E*
3!,$ F *
, !" # ,$ *
<, !" # ,$ *
,'<?
'<?@"!,$ *
<,'#"2,$
F
*
G' 'H,$
'H *
I'3"<<,$ *
2"!'#,$ J
PEpower,y
For ex ante calculation, assumed PEpower,y is not accounted due to its small size and therefore PEpower,y = 0
PEww,treatment,y
*
, !" #
,$
%&,$$ ./01 23,KL,$ 4+56,MN,KL 9:,

KL
)*+,-
Parameter
Qww,y
COD inf low,k2,y
COD,PJ,k2,y
Bo,ww
UFPJ
GWPCH4
Value
734,563
0.0017
0.001773
0.95
0.2
0.25
0.8
1.12
21
Unit
3
m
ton COD/m3
fraction
kgCH4/kgCOD
fraction
fraction
-
43
!" # ,MN,KL 3,
;:MN

(CDM
- Version 03
CDM Executive Board
5,820
PEww,treatment,y
ton CO2e /year
PEs,treatment,y
*
<,
!" # ,$
% =2,MN
MN,$ 9:<,
>
!" # ,2
.< ;:MN .A : 16D12 )*+,-
There is no sludge treatment in the Project activity and hence PEs,treatment,y = 0

PEww,discharge,y
*
$,,'<?@"! &,$ )*+,- 3, ;:MN .,'<?@"!,MN
MN,$ 9:,MN,'<?@"!
Parameter
Qww,y
GWPCH4
Bo,ww
UFPJ
CODww,dishcharge,PJ,y
MCFww,,PJ,discharge
PEww,discharge,y
Value
734,563
21
0.2
0.25
1.12
0.000088
0.1
38
Unit
m3
t CH4/t COD
fraction
ton COD/m3
fraction
ton CO2e /year
PEs,final,y
16D )*
*
<,'#"2,$ ='#"2,MN
MN,$ .< ;:MN 9:<,MN,'#"2 .A :
+,12
In the project activity,, sludge will be used for soil application in aerobic condition. In accordance with
paragraph 29 of AMS-III.H. version 16.0, this term shall be neglected.
PEfugitive,y
9
*,
!" # ,$
&,$ 3, ;:MN % .!3H,MN,K,$ 9:,
Parameter
Qww,y
Bo,ww
UFPJ
% .!3H,MN,K,$
K
MEPww,treatment,y
0.8
1,653
*
G'
Parameter
CFEww
MEPww,treatment,y
GWPCH4
PEfugitive,ww,y
Value
734,563
0.25
1.12
0.010044
'H
'H,,$
Value
0.9
1,653
21
3,471
Unit
m3/yr
t CH4/t COD
fraction
ton COD/m3
fraction
tCH4/yr
1 :
9
*,
Unit
fraction
tCH4/yr
t CO2/ t CH4
ton CO2e /year
44
!" # ,$
)*+,-
!" # ,MN,K

(CDM
- Version 03
CDM Executive Board
*
G'
'H
'H,<,$
1 :
< 9
*<,
!" # ,$
)*+,-
There is no sludge treatment system in the project activity and hence PEfugitive,s,y = 0
= 3,471 ton CO2e/year
PEfugitive,y = PEfugitive,ww,y +PEfugitive,s,y
fugiti
PE flaring,y
RSTU
*
2"!,$
2"! % 9PQ,@ 1 42"!,@
@VW
Parameter
TMRG,h
flare
GWPCH4
PEflare,y
Value
281
0.5
21
2,953
)*+,+,
1000
Unit
tCH4/yr
fraction
t CO2/ t CH4
ton CO2e/year
PE biomass,y
Assumed no emission from biomass therefore PE biomass,y = 0
PEy
*
$ E*
3!,$ F *
, !" # ,$ *
<, !" # ,$ *
,'<?
'<?@"!,$ *
<,'#"2,$
F
*
G' 'H,$
'H *
I'3"<<,$ *
2"!'#,$ J
Calculation results for Project emissions

emission are shown in Table 19
Table 19: Calculation results for project emission
ions
Parameter
Value
Unit
PEpower,y
0
tCO2e per year
PEww,treatment,y
5,820
tCO2e per year
PEs,treatment,y
0
tCO2e per year
PEww,discharge,y
38
tCO2e per year
PEs,final,y
0
tCO2e per year
PEfugitive,y
3,471
tCO2e per year
PE flaring,y
2,953
tCO2e perr year
PE biomass,y
0
tCO2e per year
PEy
tCO2e per year
12,282
1.3. Leakage
There is no transfer of used technology to or from another activity in Project activity so leakage shall be
zero
1.4. Emission reduction
The emission reduction is calculated as follow:
ERy = BEy (PEy + LEy)
45

(CDM
- Version 03
CDM Executive Board
Where BEy is 31,504 tCO2e and PEy is 12,282 tCO2e. ERy is therefore19,222 tCO2e.
2. AMS-I.F component
2.1. BE,y
BE,y
Parameter
EGBL,y
EFCO2,gtid
BEy
Value
5,690
0.743
4,227
= EGBL,y * EFCO2,grid
Unit
MWh
tCO2/MWh
t CO2e/yr
2.2. PEy
PE,y = 0 as explained in B.6.1.
Calculation results for baseline and Project emissions from electricity generation component emission are
shown in Table 20
Table 20: Calculation results for baseline and project emissions in electricity component
Parameter
Value
Unit
BEy
4,227
tCO2e per year
PEy
0
tCO2e per year
2.3. Leakage
There is no transfer of used technology to or from another activity in Project activity
activi so leakage shall be
zero.
2.4. Emission reduction
The emission reduction is calculated as follows:
ERy = BEey PE,y -LEy
Where BEey is 4,227 tCO2e and PEy is 0 tCO2e. ERey is 4,227 therefore tCO2e.
3. Overall emission reductions of the project activity
a
The overall emission reduction of the Project activity is calculated as follows:
ERtotal,y = ERAMS-III.H,y + ERAMS-I.F,y
Where ERAMS-III.H.,y is 19,222 tCO2e and ERAMS-I.F,y is 4,227 tCO2e. ERtotal,y is therefore 23,449 tCO2e.
46

(CDM
- Version 03
CDM Executive Board
This figure represents the emission reductions estimated ex ante in accordance with paragraph 32 of
AMS-III.H. version16.0.
.0. Emission reductions achieved by the Project activity will be determined ex post
as per Section B.6.1.1.4 of the PDD.
a per equation 15 in
The actual numberr of CERs to be claimed by the Project activity will be capped as
paragraph 34 of AMS-III.H. version 16.0
B.6.4
Summary of the ex-ante

ex ante estimation of emission reductions:
Table 21: Ex-ante

ante estimation of emission
emiss
reductions associated with AMS--III.H
Estimation of
Estimation of
project activity
baseline
Estimation
Estimation of
Year
emissions
emissions
of leakage
overall emission
(tCO2e)
(tCO2e)
(tCO2e)
reductions (tCO2e)
1 Nov 2012 ~ Oct 2013
12,282
31,504
19,222
2 Nov 2013 ~ Oct 2014
12,282
31,504
19,222
3 Nov 2014~ Oct 2015
12,282
31,504
19,222
4 Nov 2015 ~ Oct 2016
12,282
31,504
19,222
5 Nov 2016 ~ Oct 2017
12,282
31,504
19,222
6 Nov 2017 ~ Oct 2018
12,282
31,504
19,222
7 Nov 2018 ~ Oct 2019

Total (tonnes of
CO2e)
12,282
31,504
19,222
85,974
220,528
134,554
Table 22: Ex-ante

ante estimation of emission reductions associated with AMS--I.F.
Estimation of
Estimation of
project activity
baseline
Estimation
Estimation of
Year
emissions
emissions
of leakage
overall emission
(tCO2e)
(tCO2e)
(tCO2e)
reductions (tCO2e)
1 Nov 2012 ~ Oct 2013
4,227
4,227
2 Nov 2013 ~ Oct 2014
4,227
4,227
3 Nov 2014~ Oct 2015
4,227
4,227
4 Nov 2015 ~ Oct 2016
4,227
4,227
5 Nov 2016 ~ Oct 2017
4,227
4,227
47

(CDM
- Version 03
CDM Executive Board
6 Nov 2017 ~ Oct 2018
4,227
4,227
7 Nov 2018 ~ Oct 2019

Total (tonnes of
CO2e)
4,227
4,227
29,589
29,589
ante estimation of emission reductions for Project

Table 23: Ex-ante
Estimation of emission
reductions
Year
tons of CO2e
1
Nov 2012 ~ Oct 2013
23,449
Nov 2013 ~ Oct 2014
23,449
Nov 2014~ Oct 2015
23,449
Nov 2015 ~ Oct 2016
23,449
Nov 2016 ~ Oct 2017
23,449
Nov 2017 ~ Oct 2018
23,449
Nov 2018 ~ Oct 2019

Total (tonnes of CO2e)
23,449
23,449
B.7
Application of a monitoring methodology and description of the monitoring plan:

B.7.1
Data and parameters monitored:
Parameter:
Unit:
Description:
Source of data
Value of data
Brief description of
measurement methods
and procedures to be
ID 1 : Qww,i,y
m3/month
The flow of wastewater
wastewate
BAJ
To be measured. For the ex-ante
ex ante calculation, the following values are used
Year 1
734,563
Year 2
734,563
Year 3
734,563
Year 4
734,563
Year 5
734,563
Year 6
734,563
Year 7
734,563
Measurement procedure
This parameter shall be measured using flow meter.
48

(CDM
- Version 03
CDM Executive Board
applied:
QA/QC procedures to
be applied (if any):
Any comment:
Parameter:
Unit:
Description:
Source of data :
Value of data
measurement methods
applied:
QA/QC procedures to
Measurement frequency
Continuously (at least hourly measurements are undertaken, if less,
confidence/precision level of 90/10 shall be attained).
attained).
Daily aggregated data will be used for emission reduction calculation.
The accuracy level must be more than the level specified by the flow meter
manufacturer and also higher than 99.5%. In addition, accuracy of the measuring
instrument must comply with the industry or national standard if such is available
and applicable during a monitoring period. This must be confirmed as a part of
monitoring activity.
Calibration will be undertaken from one of the following,
following, from most to least
preferred:
(a) According to the manufacturers instructions;
(b) According to national / industry standards, if available;
(c) At least once every three years.
ID 2 : CODww,untreated,y (CODinflow,i,y7)
tCOD/m3
COD of the wastewater entering anaerobic digester in year y
On--site measurement by BAJ
ex ante calculation, 0.011817 is used
COD is measured through representative sampling.
Samples and measurements for this parameter shall ensure a 90/10
confidence/precision level, in accordance with the methodology.
methodology
Accuracy of the measuring instrument must comply with the industry or national
standard if such is available and applicable during a monitoring period. This must
be confirmed as a part of monitoring activity.
Any comment:
Calibration
alibration will be undertaken from one of the following, from most to least
preferred:
-
Parameter:
Unit:
Description:
Source of data :
Value of data
ID 3 : CODww,treated,y (CODinflow,k2,y8)
tCOD/m3
COD of the wastewater exiting anaerobic digester in year y
On--site measurement by BAJ
ex
calculation, 0.001773
73 is used
The nomenclature in the parentheses denotes the one in equation (2) of the methodology and equation (5) of the PDD.
The nomenclature in the parentheses denotes the one in equation (2) of the methodology and
nd equation (10) of the PDD.
49

(CDM
- Version 03
CDM Executive Board
measurement methods
applied:
QA/QC procedures to
Any comment:
Parameter:
Unit:
Description:
Source of data :
Value of data
Description of
measurement methods
applied:
QA/QC procedures to
Any comment:
Data / Parameter:
Data unit:
Description:
Source of data to be
used:
Value of data
Description of
measurement methods
Samples and measurements for this parameter shall ensure a 90/10
confidence/precision level, in accordance with the methodology.
confidence/precision
be confirmed
co
as a part of monitoring activity.
Calibration will be undertaken from one of the following, from most to least
preferred:
(c) At least
le once every three years.
ID 4: CODww,discharge,PJ,y
tCOD/m3
COD of the final treated wastewater discharged into sea, river or lake in the
project situation in year y
BAJ
ex ante calculation, 0.000088 is used
Samples and measurements shall ensure
ensure a 90/10 confidence/precision level
preferred:
(c) At least once
onc every three years.
ID 5 : CODremoved,PJ,k,y
t COD/m
COD 3
COD removed by the treatment system k of the project activity equipped with
biogas recovery in the year y
BAJ
To be calculated. For the ex-ante
ex
calculation, 0.010044
0.0100 is used.
Difference between the inflow COD (CODww,untreated,y) and the outflow COD
(COD
CODww,treated,y)
50

(CDM
- Version 03
CDM Executive Board
applied:
QA/QC procedures to
be applied:
Any comment:
Data / Parameter:
Data unit:
Description:
used:
Value of data
Description of
measurement methods
applied:
QA/QC procedures to
be applied:
Any comment:
Parameter:
Unit:
Description:
ID 6 : COD,PJ,k2
Chemical Oxygen Demand removal efficiency of the project wastewater
secondary treatment system (k2) in year y
BAJ
ex ante calculation, 0.95 is used.
Calculated based on inflow COD (CODww,treated,y) and outflow COD
(CODww,discharge,PJ,y) in the secondary treatment system, both of which will be
monitored
-
Source of data :
Value of data
ID 7 : Sfinal,PJ,y
Tonnes
Amount of dry matter in final sludge generated by the project wastewater
treatment systems in the year y
BAJ
To be measured.
measurement methods
applied:
Measure the total quantity of sludge on a wet basis. The volume (m3) and density
or direct weighing may be used to determine
determine the sludge amount (wet basis). This
shall be done using weighing bridge or equivalent equipment.
Representative samples are taken to determine the moisture content to calculate
the total sludge amount on dry basis.
QA/QC procedures to
Monitoring of 100% of the sludge amount through continuous or batch
measurements and moisture content through representative sampling to ensure
e
the 90/10 confidence/precision level. The moisture content will be determined
through representative sampling to ensure the 90/10 confidence/precision level.
In the case of off-site
off
disposal, the weighed tonnage
age can be compared against the
records of waste contractor / end user.
be confirmed as a part
par of monitoring activity.
51

(CDM
- Version 03
CDM Executive Board
Any comment:
Parameter:
Unit:
Description:
Source of data :
Value of data
measurement methods
applied:
QA/QC procedures to
Any comment:
Parameter:
Unit:
Description:
Source of data :
Value of data
measurement methods
applied:
QA/QC procedures to
preferred:
(b) According to national / industry standards, if available
If the sludge is controlled combusted, disposed of in a landfill with biogas e
recovery, or used for soil application in aerobic conditions in the project activity,
this term shall be neglected, and the sludge treatment and/or use and/or final
disposal shall be monitored
monitored during the crediting period in accordance with
paragraph 29 of the methodology.
ID 8: BGburnt,y
(N)m3 biogas
Total amount of biogas
Calculated
To be calculated.
As per the methodology AMS-III.H.
AMS III.H. Version 16.0, if the biogas streams flared
(BG
BGflaring) and utilized (BGgas_engine) are monitored separately, the two fractions
can be added together to determine the total biogas
biogas recovered, without the need
to monitor the recovered biogas before the separation.
ID 9: BGflaring (FVRG,h9)
(N)m3 biogas
Amount of biogas to be flared
BAJ
To be measured.
Monitored continuously (at least hourly
hourly measurements are undertaken, if less,
The accuracy level must be more than the level
el specified by the flow meter
manufacturer and also higher than 99%. In addition, accuracy of the measuring
instrument must comply with the industry
ndustry or national standard if such is available
and applicable during a monitoring period. This must be confirmed
confirme as a part of
preferred:
The nomenclature in the parentheses denotes the one in equation (13) of the Tool
Tool to determine project emissions from flaring
gases containing methane.
52

(CDM
- Version 03
CDM Executive Board
Any comment:
(c) At least once

on every three years.
-
Parameter:
Unit:
Description:
Source of data :
Value of data
ID 10: BGgas_engine
(N)m3 biogas
Amount of biogas combusted in gas engine
BAJ
To be measured.
measurement methods
applied:
QA/QC procedures to
Any comment:
Parameter:
Unit:
Description:
Source of data :
Value of data
measurement methods
applied:
QA/QC procedures to
Monitored continuously (at least hourly measurements are undertaken, if less,
Daily aggregated
aggregated data will be used for emission reduction calculation.
The accuracy level must be more than the level specified by the flow meter
manufacturer and also higher than 99%. In addition, accuracy of the measuring
preferred:
ID 11: wCH4,flaring (fvCH4,Rg,h10)
%
Methane concentration of biogas fed to the flare
BAJ
To be measured
This parameter will be measured with a continuous analyzer
analyze or, alternatively,
with periodical measurements (e.g. using portable system). This methane content
measurement shall be carried out close to a location in the system where a biogas
flow measurement takes places.
Continuously in the
the case that an online system is used. Periodically at a 90/10
confidence/precision level in the case that a portable system is used.
The accuracy level must be more than the level specified by the gas analyzer
manufacturer and also higher than 96%. In addition,accuracy
addition
of the measuring
10
The nomenclature in the parentheses denotes the one in equation (13) of the Tool
Tool to determine project emissions from flaring
gases containing methane.
53

(CDM
- Version 03
CDM Executive Board
and applicable during a monitoring
moni
period. This must be confirmed as a part of
Any comment:
Data / Parameter:
Data unit:
Description:
used:
Value of data
Description of
measurement methods
applied:
QA/QC procedures to
be applied:
preferred:
(b) According to national / industry standards,
standards, if available;
ID 12 : wCH4,gas_engine
%
Methane concentration of biogas fed to the gas engine
BAJ
To be measured.
This parameter will be measured using a continuous analyzer or, alternatively,
with periodical measurements (e.g. using portable system). This methane content
measurement shall be carried out close to a location in the system where a biogas
flow measurement takes places.
Continuously in the case that an online system is used. Periodically at a 90/10
confidence/precision level in the case that a portable system is used.
The accuracy level must be more than the level specified by the gas analyzer
manufacturer and also higher than 96%. In addition,
addition accuracy of the measuring
Any comment:
Calibration will be undertaken from

from one of the following, from most to least
preferred:
-
Parameter:
Unit:
Description:
Source of data :
Value of data
measurement methods
ID 13: Tbiogas
Degree celcius
Temperature of biogas
BAJ
To be measured.
The temperature of the gas is required to determine the
th density of the methane
combusted.
54

(CDM
- Version 03
CDM Executive Board
applied:
It Shall be measured at the same time when methane content in biogas (wCH4,flaring
and wCH4,gas_engine) is measured.
QA/QC procedures to
Any comment:
Parameter:
Unit:
Description:
Source of data :
Value of data
measurement methods
applied:

Calibrationn will be undertaken from one of the following, from most to least
Calibratio
preferred:
If the biogas
biogas flow meter employed measures flow, pressure and temperature and
displays or outputs the normalized flow of biogas, then there is no need for
separate monitoring of pressure and temperature of the biogas.
ID 14: Pbiogas
Pa
Pressure of biogas
BAJ
To be measured.
The pressure of the gas is required to determine the density of the methane
combusted
combusted.
It Shall be measured at the same time when methane content in biogas (w
( CH4,flaring
and wCH4,gas_engine) is measured
QA/QC procedures to
Any comment:
Data / Parameter:
Data unit:

Calibration will be undertaken from one of the
the following, from most to least
preferred:
If the biogas flow meter employed measures flow,
flow, pressure and temperature and
displays or outputs the normalized flow of biogas, then there is no need for
separate monitoring of pressure and temperature of the biogas.
ID 15: Tflare
o
C
55

(CDM
- Version 03
CDM Executive Board
Description:
used:
Value of data
Description of
measurement methods
applied:
QA/QC procedures to
be applied:
Any comment:
Parameter:
Unit:
Description:
Source of data :
Value of data
measurement methods
applied:
QA/QC procedures to
Any comment:
Temperature in the exhaust

exh
gas of the flare
BAJ
To be measured according to the manufacturers specifications.
If a thermocouple (Type N) is usedd as a flame detection system, pursuant to
SSC_199, the flare is deemed operational when the temperature exceeds the
given minimum temperature from the manufacturer.
Continuously if when there is an amount of biogas fed to the flare
preferred:
(c) At least once every three years
An excessively high temperature at the sampling point (above 700oC) may be an
indication that the flare is not being adequately operated or that its capacity is not
adequate to the actual flow.
ID 16: Other flare operation parameters
This
his should include all data and parameters that are required to monitor whether
the flare operates within the range of operating conditions according to the
manufacturers specifications including a flame detector in case of open flares.
BAJ
To be measured according to the manufacturers specifications.
Through a flame detection system reporting electronically on a continuous basis
and any other measurement
measurement methods and procedures stipulated in the
manufacturers specifications to monitor whether the flare is operational
preferred:
(a)) According to the manufacturers instructions;
Only applicable in case of use of a default value. According to page 2 of the
Tool to determine
determine project emissions from flaring gases containing methane,
methane the
default values are:
- 50% if it can be demonstrated that the flare is operational and
- 0%, if the flare is not operational.
For ex ante calculation, the default value of 50% will be used.
is monitoring item is not relevant when ID 15, pursuant to SSC_199, is
This
56

(CDM
- Version 03
CDM Executive Board
deemed sufficient to confirm that the flare is operational.

Parameter:
Unit:
Description:
Source of data :
Value of data
measurement methods
applied:
ID 17: EGgenerated,y
MWh
Amount of electricity produced by the project activity
BAJ
To be measured
This parameter will be measured using electricity meter
QA/QC procedures to
Accuracy for the meter is at least 0.5S that is considered as appropriate for
Tariff
Tariff Metering11. In addition, accuracy
ccuracy of the measuring instrument
i
must
comply with the industry or national standard if such is available and applicable
during a monitoring period. This must be confirmed as a part of monitoring
activity.
Any comment:
Parameter:
Unit:
Description:
Source of data :
Value of data
measurement methods
applied:
QA/QC procedures to
Continuously and recorded at least monthly.
mont
l
preferred:
ID 18: ECPJ,y
MWh
Quantity of electricity
electricity consumed by the project activity facilities in year y
BAJ
To be measured
This parameter will be measured using energy meter
Continuously and recorded at least monthly.Daily
monthly.Daily aggregated data will be used
for emission reduction calculation.
Accuracy for the meter is at least 0.5S that is considered as appropriate for
Tariff
Tariff Metering . In addition, accuracy
ccuracy of the measuring instrument must
comply with the industry or national standard if such is available and applicable
during a monitoring period. This must be confirmed as a part of monitoring
activity.
preferred:
11
http://www.rsisolsec.com/en/selecting
http://www.rsisolsec.com/en/selecting-a-Current-Transformer.html
57

(CDM
- Version 03
CDM Executive Board
Any comment:

-
Parameter:
Unit:
Description:
Source of data :
Value of data
ID 19: EGBL,y
MWh
Quantity of net electricity displaced in year y
Calculated on the basis of values monitored by BAJ
ex ante calculation, the following values are used
measurement methods
applied:
Year 1
Yea
5,690
Year 2
5,690
Year 3
5,690
Year 4
5,690
Year 5
5,690
Year 6
5,690
Year 7
5,690
Calculated as the difference between the gross energy generation by the Project
(EG
EGgenerated,y) and the auxiliary electricity consumption. For this project activity,
the auxiliary electricity consumption includes electricity consumption for the
sake of the Projects digester operation (EC
( PJ,y).
QA/QC procedures to
Any comment:
Parameter:
Unit:
Description:
Source of data :
Value of data
measurement methods
applied:
QA/QC procedures to
Daily aggregated data will be used for emission

emission reduction calculation.
-
ID 20: FCPJ_digester,diesel,y
Mass or (normalized) volume unit (in m3, ton or litre )
Amount of fossil fuel (diesel) consumed by the Project
Project activity facilities for
AMS
AMS-III.H
component
BAJ
ex
calculation 0 is used
The amount of diesel fed consumed by Project
Project will be measured by weight or
volume meters, if and when diesel consumption by the project activity is
expected.
Should the meter be installed, the calibration will be undertaken from one of the
following, from most to least preferred:
58

(CDM
- Version 03
CDM Executive Board
The consistency of metered fuel consumption quantities should be cross-checked

cross
by an annual energy balance that is based
based on purchased quantities and stock
changes.
Where the purchased fuel invoices can be identified specifically for the CDM
project, the metered fuel consumption quantities should also be cross-checked
cross
with available purchase invoices from the financial records
rec
Data / Parameter:
Data unit:
Description:
used:
Value of data
Description of
measurement methods
applied:
QA/QC procedures to
be applied:
Any comment:
ID 21: FCPJ_gas_engine,diesel,y
Mass or (normalized) volume unit (in m3, ton or litre )
Amount of fossil fuel (diesel) consumed by the Project activity facilities for
AMS
AMS-I.F.
component
BAJ
ex
calculation 0 is used
The amount of diesel fed consumed by Project will be measured by weight or
volume meters, if and when diesel consumption by the project activity is
expected.
Should the meter be installed, the calibration will be undertaken from one of the
following, from most to least preferred:
The consistency of metered
metered fuel consumption quantities should be cross-checked
cross
by an annual energy balance that is based on purchased quantities and stock
changes.
Where the purchased fuel invoices can be identified specifically for the CDM
project, the metered fuel consumption
consumption quantities should also be cross-checked
cross
with available purchase invoices from the financial records
If the value pertinent to this parameter is already included in ID 20, it need not be
separately monitored.
Data / Parameter:
Data unit:
Description:
used:
Value of data
Description of
measurement methods
applied:
QA/QC procedures to
be applied:
ID 22: ECPJ,grid,y
MWh
Quantity of electricity consumed by the project activity sourced from the grid in
year y
BAJ
ex ante calculation, 0 is used.
Calculated based on quantity of electricity produced by the project activity
(EGgenerated,Y) and Quantity of electricity consumed by the project activity
facilities in year y (ECPJ,y), both of which will be monitored.
monitored
-
59

(CDM
- Version 03
CDM Executive Board
Any comment:
It is noted that the Projects design is such that all the electricity consumed for
the sake of the Project is supplied by the Project itself under normal
circumstances. The parameter ECPJ,grid,y is relevant only when the electricity
consumed by the digester operation (EC
( PJ,y) exceeds the electricity generated by
the Project (EG
( generated,y), a net amount after considering
ring the parasitic consumption
related to power generation.
ECPJ,grid,y will be 0 when EGgenerated,y > ECPJ,y and
ECPJ,y - EGgenerated,y when EGgenerated,y < ECPJ,y
The latter case will be extremely
extr
rare.
B.7.2
Description of the monitoring plan:
1. Implementation of the monitoring plan

The planned operation and management structure for the
the Project is described in the following
figure
Operations
On-Site
Site/Plant
Manager
Senior
Management
CDM Management
CDM Manager
Co-operation for QA/QC
Supervisor
Data/ aggregated data
Operators &
Laboratory Staff
Operator and laboratory staff will be responsible for monitoring the assigned parameters and
conducting lab tests, in the manner and at the frequency stipulated for each parameter in the
Monitoring Plan. The daily recorded parameters will be reviewed by the
th Supervisor and a report
of aggregated data will be submitted to the plant Manager on a monthly basis.
The CDM Manager is responsible for overall management of the CDM process for the Project.
The CDM Manager will review the monitored data on a daily basis
basis and will coordinate with the
on-site
site Manager in the event of a QC/QA problem for monitoring.
60

(CDM
- Version 03
CDM Executive Board
2. Staff Training
Staff will be trained on the safe and proper operation of major equipments such as the anaerobic
digester , flare and gas engine, and will also
also be trained on the monitoring equipment installed.
3. Data recording and archiving
(a) Data recording
Recording will be done online for as many parameters as possible, though the exact meters to be
connected is yet to be determined. For manual records (including
(including backup manual recording when
there is an error with the online system for parameters normally recorded online), recording will
be carried out once daily where measurement is continuous, and as and when measurements
occur for when measurement is done
done on batch basis (e.g. COD measurements).
(b) Data archiving
All monitored data will be archived for the duration of the crediting period and 2 years thereafter.
4. Calibration management system
To carry out calibration consistent with the manner and frequency
frequency specified in the Monitoring
Plan, a calibration mater list will be prepared jointly by Supervisor
upervisor and CDM Manager and needs
to be agreed with by plant Manager. Based on the Monitoring Plan, the master list will specify the
calibration plans and schedule
schedule for each of the instrument that requires calibration.
The plant Manager is responsible for ensuring that calibration is conducted pursuant to the plan.
In the event of a problem, the plant Manager will immediately discuss it with the CDM Manager
and if necessary with the Senior Management.
5. Emergency procedure
In case any data are temporarily not available for reasons
reason such as a faulty meter, the values for the
relevant parameters will be either (1) determined with the most conservative assumption
theoretically
oretically possible or (2) estimated in a conservative manner before submitting a request for
deviation.
B.8
Date of completion of the application of the baseline and monitoring methodology and the
name of the responsible person(s)/entity(ies)
Date of completion: 08/02/2012
PT. Carbon Partners Asiatica
Wisma Metropolitan II, 6th Floor
Jl. Jendral Sudirman Kav. 29--31, Karet Setiabudi
Jakarta Selatan, 12920 Indonesia
dini.laraswati@cp-asiatica.com
asiatica.com
Telephone: +62-21-8378-5130
5130
Facsimile: +62-21-8370-8818
8818
Carbon Partners Asiatica,, Co. Ltd.
2-12-18-802 Ueno, Taitou-ku,
ku, Tokyo 110-0005,
110
Japan
junji.hatano@cp-asiatica.com
asiatica.com
Telephone: +81-3-6240-1786
Facsimile: +81-3-3469-5006
61

(CDM
- Version 03
CDM Executive Board
Carbon Partners Asiatica is the CDM Advisor for the project and is not a project participant listed in
Annex 1.
SECTION C. Duration of the project activity / crediting period
C.1
Duration of the project activity:

activity
C.1.1. Starting datee of the project activity:

activity
21/10/2011
C.1.2. Expected operational lifetime of the project activity:
25 years and 0 month
C.2
Choice of the crediting period and related information:

C.2.1. Renewable crediting period
C.2.1.1.
Starting date of the first crediting period:
01/11/2012 or the date of registration, whichever is later
C.2.1.2.
7 years and 0 month
Length of the first crediting period:
C.2.2. Fixed crediting period:

period
C.2.2.1.
Starting date:
C.2.2.2.
Length:
Not applicable
Not applicable
SECTION D. Environmental impacts

D.1.
If required by the host Party,
Par documentation on the analysis of the environmental impacts
of the project activity:
Indonesia has two kinds of environmental licences the
he AMDAL and UKL/UPL.
UKL/UPL An AMDAL is
required for businesses that will have a significant impact on the environment. Business operations which
will not have a significant environmental impact are required to have a UKL/UPL approved.
According to Ministry of Environment Decree No. 11/2006,
11/200 , an environmental impact assessment
(AMDAL) is not required for the proposed Project.
roject. Yet, the Project owner is obliged to prepare an
environmental management and monitoring report (UPL/UKL). The UKL/UPL has been approved by the
62

(CDM
- Version 03
CDM Executive Board
Agency of Environment Control

trol (Badan Lingkungan
Lingk
Hidup BLH) of Tulang Bawang Barat Regency in
November 2011.
An integral part of the approved UKL/UPL (section 2.1.1.3) is continued observance of the discharge
COD concentration limit set currently at 300 mg/l by government regulations.
regulations. This is one of the crucial
UKL/UPL commitments on the part of the owner of the Project, in view of the
t tapioca starch factorys
obligation to comply with Government Regulation No. 82/2011 regarding the wastewater discharged
from its compound.
semi
environmental
In this respect, it is noted that the tapioca starch factory is required to submit semi-annual
management and monitoring reports
report to the local Department of Environment (at the district level) , which
include performance pertaining to wastewater discharge.
D.2.
If environmental impacts are considered significant by the project participants or the host
Party,, please provide conclusions and all references to support documentation of an environmental
impact assessment undertaken in accordance with the
the procedures as required by the host Party:
No environmental impacts are considered significant by the project participants or the host party
SECTION E. Stakeholders comments

E.1.
Brief description how comments by local stakeholders have been invited

invite and compiled:
BAJ conducted a stakeholder meeting for the Project on 15 December 2011. The meeting took place at
Menggalas factory where the Project is located.
located. The participants were invited to the stakeholders
stakeholder
meeting through invitation letters
letter distributed
ibuted to various institutions including local environmental
agencies of Lampung (BLH Lampung and BLH Tulang Bawang Barat), official government of Tulang
Bawang Tengah Sub-district
district and official government of Penumangan Baru Village, as well as to
community members through the government head of Penumangan Baru Village (Kepala Kampung).
A total of 41 participants attended the meeting, excluding BAJs management members. The list of the
participants will be provided to the DOE during validation.
The meeting was facilitated by BAJ and was carried out according to the ensuing programme.
programme
1. Registration;
2. Opening speech by BAJ;
3. Opening speech by local environmental agency of Lampung;
4. Opening speech by local environmental agency of Tulang Bawang Barat;
5. Opening speechh by official government Tulang Bawang Tengah Sub-district
district;
6. Opening speech by official government Penumangan Baru Village ;
7. Presentation of the Project by BAJ
8. Question and Answer session
9. Closing
63

(CDM
- Version 03
CDM Executive Board
Figure 4 : Stakeholders consultation meetings

E.2.
Summary of the comments received:
No questions or comments were raised during the meeting.

According to the questionnaire results, all of the respondents agreed that the Project would
w
cause less
pollution than a diesel//PLN
N power plant.
plant. None of the respondents had a negative view of the Project.
E.3.
Report on how due account was taken of any comments received:
No further action is deemed necessary.
64

(CDM
- Version 03
CDM Executive Board
Annex 1
CONTACT INFORMATION ON PARTICIPANTS IN THE PROJECT ACTIVITY
ACTIV
Organization:
Street/P.O.Box:
Building:
City:
State/Region:
Postfix/ZIP:
Country:
Telephone:
FAX:
E-Mail:
URL:
Represented by:
Title:
Salutation:
Last Name:
Middle Name:
First Name:
Department:
Mobile:
Direct FAX:
Direct tel:
Personal E-Mail:
PT. Budi Acid Jaya

Jl. H.R. Rasuna Said Kav C-6
C
Wisma Budi 8th-9th Floor
Jakarta
DKI Jakarta Province
Indonesia
+62--21-5213383
+62--21-5213392
Mr.
Tasmin
Sudarmo
sudarmo@sungaibudi.com
65

(CDM
- Version 03
CDM Executive Board
Annex 2
INFORMATION REGARDING PUBLIC FUNDING
NOT APPLICABLE
66

(CDM
- Version 03
CDM Executive Board
Annex 3
BASELINE INFORMATION12
The baseline emission factor is calculated following the steps stipulated in the Tool to calculate the
emission factor for an electricity system version 2.2.1. The ex ante option is chosen.
The determination of the emission factor is performed by following the steps below:
Step 1: Identify the relevant electricity systems.
According to PLNs actual grid structure, Sumatera grid covers NAD Province, North
N
Sumatera Province,
Riau Province, Jambi Province, West Sumatera Province, South Sumatera Province and Lampung
Province. The project activity is located in Lampung province which is covered by Sumatera Power Grid.
Thus, the relevant electric power system
syst is Sumatera Power Grid.
off grid power plants in the project electricity system (optional).
Step 2: Choose whether to include off-grid
Option I is chosen in this calculation which includes only grid power plants.
Step 3: Select a method to determine the operating
operat
margin (OM).
The Tool to calculate the emission factor for an electricity system Version 02 offers four methods to
calculate the operating margin (OM):
a. Simple OM; or
b. Simple adjusted OM; or
c. Dispatch data analysis OM; or
d. Average OM
Pursuant to the specific data in Annex 3,
3 the low-cost/ must-run
run resources in Sumatera grid accounted for
less than 50% of the total amount in the Sumatera grid. Accordingly,
According , the simple OM method is selected
for calculating the emission factor.
The ex-ante option is chosen,, using a 3-year generation-weighted
weighted average, based on the most recent data
available at the time of submission of the CDM-PDD
CDM PDD to the DOE for validation.
Step 4: Calculate the operating margin emission factor according to the selected method.
The
he simple OM emission factor is calculated as the generation-weighted
generation weighted average CO2 emissions per unit
net electricity generation (tCO2/MWh) of all generating power plants serving the system, not including
low-cost/ must-run
run power plants/units. The simple OM may be calculated by choosing one of these below
two options:
Option A
: Based on the net electricity generation and a CO2 emission factor of each power unit; or
Option B
: Based on the total net electricity generation of all power plants serving the system
syst and
the fuel types and total fuel consumption of the project electricity system.
Option B can only be used if:
(a) The necessary data for option A is not available; and
12
Calculation published by Department of Energy and Mineral Resources of

Indonesia - Directorate General of Electricity and Energy Utilization and endorsed by Indonesia DNA on 19 January 2009.
2009 The
data contained in this section is the latest publicly
public available information to calculate the gridss emission factor pursuant to the
Tool to calculate the emission factor for an electricity system version 2.2.1.. The summary of the data utilized herein was
adopted by ref. 5368 registered on 31 October, 2011.
2
67

(CDM
- Version 03
CDM Executive Board
(b) Only nuclear and renewable power generation are considered as low-cost/
low
must-run power
sources and the quantity of electricity supplied to the grid by these sources is known; and
(c) Off-grid
grid power plants are not included in the calculation (i.e., if Option I has been chosen in Step
2).
The calculation of the simple OM emission factor uses option
optio B, whose prerequisites (a), (b) and (c)
above are all met by the Project. Thus, the
he simple OM emission factor is calculated based on the net
electricity supplied to the grid by all power plants serving the system, not including low-cost/
low
must-run
power
wer plants/units, and based on the fuel type(s) and total fuel consumption of the project electricity
system, as follows :
Where:
' :',$ Z [\',$ Z
:+5L,',$
:!',5Y <'2,$
)$
EFgrid, OM simple, y
FCi,y
=
=
NCVi,y
EFCO2,i,y
EGy
=
=
Simple operating margin CO2 emission factor in year y (tCO2/MWh)

Amounts of fossil fuel type i consumed in the project electricity system
in year y (Mass or volume unit)
Net calorific value (energy content) of fossil fuel
fue type i in year y (GJ/
mass or volume unit)
CO2 emission factor of fossil fuel type i in year y (tCO2/GJ)
Net electricity generated and delivered to the grid by all power sources
serving the system, not including low-cost/
cost/ must-run
must
power plants/
units, in year y (MWh)
All fossil fuel types combusted in power sources in the project electricity
system in year y
The relevant year as per the data vintage chosen in step 3
68

(CDM
- Version 03
CDM Executive Board
Calculation of Operating
ing Margin
Fuel
MFO
IDO
HSD
Coal
Natural Gas
Fuel
MFO
IDO
HSD
Coal
Natural Gas
Fuel
MFO
IDO
HSD
Coal
Natural Gas
Unit
kiloliter
kiloliter
kiloliter
ton
MMBTU
Unit
kiloliter
kiloliter
kiloliter
ton
MMBTU
Unit
kiloliter
kiloliter
kiloliter
ton
MMBTU
Table : Simple OM Emission Factors Calculation of Sumatera Grid for Year 2005
Sumbagsel
Sumbagut
Total
EF
Oxidation
NCV
(include IPP)
(tC/TJ)
(%)
A
B
C=A+B
D
E
F
510
323,472
323,982
21.1
100%
40,767 MJ/kl
15,662
0
15,662
20.2
100%
37,219 MJ/kl
176,692
1,009,112
1,185,804
20.2
100%
36,542 MJ/kl
1,651,943
0
1,651,943
25.8
100%
27,444 MJ/ton
20,792,324
14,299,034
35,091,358
15.3
100%
Sumbagsel
Sumbagut
Total
EF
Oxidation
NCV
(Include IPP)
(tC/TJ)
(%)
B
C=A+B
D
E
F
A
0
256,020
256,020
21.1
100%
40,767 MJ/kl
17,137
0
17,137
20.2
100%
37,219 MJ/kl
188,208
1,150,461
1,338,668
20.2
100%
36,542 MJ/kl
1,530,391
0
1,530,391
25.8
100%
27,444 MJ/ton
27,980,333
7,994,188
35,974,521
15.3
100%
Sumbagsel
Sumbagut
Total
EF
Oxidation
NCV
(Include IPP)
(tC/TJ)
(%)
A
B
C=A+B
D
E
F
100%
40,767 MJ/kl
0
281,427
281,427
21.1
7,989
0
7,989
20.2
100%
37,219 MJ/kl
108,594
1,250,672
1,359,267
20.2
100%
36,542 MJ/kl
1,706,554
0
1,706,554
25.8
100%
27,444 MJ/ton
32,399,087
10,131,294
42,530,382
15.3
100%
69
CO2 Emission
(tCO2e)
G
1,021,834
43,177
3,209,402
4,288,852
2,076,978
10,640,244
CO2 Emission
(tCO2e)
G
807,483
47,243
3,623,133
3,973,273
2,129,251
10,580,383
CO2 Emission
(tCO2e)
G
887,616
22,025
3,678,883
4,430,637
2,517,277
11,536,438

(CDM
- Version 03
CDM Executive Board
Total Generation Capacity (2005-2007) excl. Low-Cost/Must-Run

2005
MWh
2,505,314
0
1,060,814
125,254
2,932,330
529,384
66,887
0
451,084
1,154,204
0
5,672,687
14,497,958
2,505,314
11,992,644
3.98%
11,514,899
Type of Power Plant

Fuel type
Hydro
Geothermal
Steam - Oil
MFO
Steam - Gas
Natural Gas
Steam - Coal
Coal
Diesel
HSD
IDO
Diesel
Diesel
PPO
Combustion Turbine - Oil
HSD
Combustion Turbine - Gas
Natural Gas
Combined Cycle - Oil
HSD
Combined Cycle - Gas
Natural Gas
Total
Total Low Cost Must Run
Total Generation excl. Low-Cost/Must-Run
Internal use rate
Net Electricity
2006
MWh
2,948,239
0
837,664
113,808
2,868,414
567,470
73,971
5,108
517,802
974,046
0
6,221,137
15,127,659
2,953,347
12,174,312
3.47%
11,751,548
2007
MWh
3,593,005
0
949,438
119,821
3,257,691
498,576
34,026
0
417,080
1,206,994
0
6,259,426
16,336,057
2,953,347
13,382,710
3.52%
12,911,406
Total Emissions / Total Generation
Total Emissions
Total Generation
EFOM,y
EFOM2006
tCO2e
MWh
tCO2e/MWh
2005
2006
2007
10,640,244
11,514,899
0.924
10,580,383
11,751,548
0.900
11,536,438
12,911,406
0.894
0.906 tCO2e/MWh Operating Margin
Step 5:: Calculate the build margin (BM) emission factor

In terms of the vintage of data, the EF tool allows project participants to choose one of the following two
options:
Option 1:: For the first crediting period, calculate the build margin emission factor ex ante based on the
most recent information available on units already built for sample group m at the time of CDM-PDD
submission to the DOE for validation. For the second crediting period, the build margin emission factor
should be updated based on the most recent information available on units already built at the time of
submission of the request for renewal of the crediting period to the DOE. For the third crediting period,
the build margin emission factor calculated for the second
second crediting period should be used. This option
does not require monitoring the emission factor during the crediting period.
Option 2:: For the first crediting period, the build margin emission factor shall be updated annually, ex
post, including those units
ts built up to the year of registration of the project activity or, if information up to
the year of registration is not yet available, including those units built up to the latest year for which
information is available. For the second crediting period, the
the build margin emissions factor shall be
70

(CDM
- Version 03
CDM Executive Board
calculated ex ante,, as described in Option 1 above. For the third crediting period, the build margin
emission factor calculated for the second crediting period should be used.
Option 1 is chosen by the project participant
part
in terms of the vintage of data.
Identify the group of power units to be included in the build margin (BM).
The sample group of power units m used to calculate the build margin for the Project is determined to be
SET20% as defined in the EF tool, considering that:
that
(a) SET20% represents a larger amount of generation than SET5-unit; and
(b) None of the power plants in SET20% started to supply electricity more than 10 years ago.
Calculate the build margin emission factor.

The
he build margin emission factor is the generation-weighted
generation weighted average emission factor (tCO2/MWh) of all
power units m during the most recent year y for which power generation data is available, calculated as
follows:

),$ Z
:]8,,$
:!',7Y,$

),$
Where:
EFgrid,BM,y
EGm,y
=
=
EFEL,m,y
m
y
=
=
=

et quantity of electricity generated and delivered to the grid by power unit m In
year y (MWh)
Power units
u
included in the build margin
Power units included in the build margin
Most recent historical year for which power generation data is available
Calculation of Build Margin

Station
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
Installed
capacity
(kW)
-PLTU Tarahan 1
PLTU Tarahan 2
PLTG Riau Power (rental)
PLTD Sewa Arti Duta AU (rental)
PLTG Meppo Gen (IPP)
PLTG Apung
PLTA 1 Renun
PLTA Musi 1
PLTA Musi 2
PLTA Musi 3
PLTD-12 Gunung Sitoli
PLTD-13 Gunung Sitoli
PLTD-1 Teluk Dalam
PLTA-2 Renun
PLTG Inderalaya II
PLTG Truck Mounted 1
PLTG Truck Mounted 2
PLTG Rental Tl. Duku #1
PLTD 12 LUENG BATA*
PLTD 13 LUENG BATA*
PLTD 14 LUENG BATA*
PLTGU Borang (IPP)
-100,000
100,000
20,000
15,000
80,000
30,000
41,000
71,825
71,825
71,825
1,010
1,010
1,010
41,000
40,000
20,000
20,000
20,000
3,450
3,450
3,450
150,000
Year of
Commission
-2007
2007
2007
2007
2007
2007
2006
2006
2006
2006
2005
2005
2005
2005
2004
2004
2004
2004
2004
2004
2004
2004
Fuel Type
-coal & HSD
coal & HSD
Gas
HSD
Gas
HSD
Hydro
Hydro
Hydro
Hydro
HSD
HSD
HSD
Hydro
Gas & HSD
Gas
Gas
Gas
HSD
HSD
HSD
Gas
Fuel
Gas
Coal (ton)
HSD (kl)
(MMBTU)
-47,926
98,072
Electricity Generation
Parasitic
2007 (Gross)
2007 (Net)
load (ave)
1,284
2,903
1,119,896
20,270
5,292,873
2,816
866
866
871
2,492,620
1,463,191
0
365,123
1,451
1,451
1,451
13,156,205
145,998 23,889,909
71
34,230
MWh
105,450
204,410
74,994
77,297
297,674
9,817
163,003
183,105
183,499
197,278
3,176
3,176
3,176
163,003
227,141
125,434
0
16,040
5,017
5,017
5,017
1,247,034
3,299,757
%
3.52%
3.52%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
3.52%
3.52%
3.52%
3.52%
3.52%
3.52%
3.52%
3.52%
3.52%
3.52%
3.52%
3.52%
0.00%
3.52%
3.52%
3.52%
0.00%
MWh
101,736
197,212
74,994
77,297
297,674
9,471
157,262
176,657
177,036
190,330
3,064
3,064
3,064
157,262
219,141
125,434
0
16,040
4,841
4,841
4,841
1,247,034
3,248,295

(CDM
- Version 03
CDM Executive Board
'power plant capacity additions in the elc. System that comprise 20% of the system generation'
2007
Total Generation
22-last
22-last / Total
MWh
MWh
%
16,336,057
3,299,757
20.2
22-last Total Emissions / 22-last Total Generation

Parameter
Unit
Total Power Generated (net)

Fuel Consumption (HSD)
EF
Oxidation
Emissions from HSD
Fuel Consumption (Gas)
EF
Oxidation
Emissions from Natural Gas
Fuel Consumption (Coal)
EF
Oxidation
Emissions from Coal
Total Emissions
EFBM2007
EFBM2007
EFBM2007
MWh
kl
TJ
tC/TJ
tCO2e
MMBTU
TJ
tC/TJ
tCO2e
ton
TJ
tC/TJ
tCO2e
tCO2e
tCO2e/GWh
tCO2e/MWh
2007
3,248,295
34,230
1,251
20.20
100%
92,644
23,889,909
25,205
15.30
100%
1,413,990
145,998
4,007
25.8
100%
379,047
1,885,681
580.5
0.581
0.581 tCO2e/MWh Build Margin
Step 6: Calculate the combined margin (CM) emissions factor.

factor
The combined margin emission factor has been estimated as a weighted average of the OM and BM.
EFgrid,CM,y
= (EFgrid,OM,y * wWOM) + (EFgrid,BM,y * wBM)
Nomenclature
EFgrid,OM,y
wOM
EFgrid,BM,y
wBM
Description
Operating margin CO2 emission factor in year y (tCO2/MWh)
/MW
Weighting of operating margin emission factor (%)
Weighting of build margin emission factor (%)
Value
0.906
0.5
0.581
0.5
The calculation (ex ante option) of the combined margin emission

ission factor (EFgrid,CM,y) has been estimated
as 0.743 tonnes of CO2/MWh.
/MWh
72

(CDM
- Version 03
CDM Executive Board
Annex 4
MONITORING INFORMATION
N/A. Please section B.7.
-----
73

Clean Development Mechanism

Hochgeladen von

Dokumentinformationen

Originalbeschreibung:

Copyright

Verfügbare Formate

Dieses Dokument teilen

Dokument teilen oder einbetten

Freigabeoptionen

Stufen Sie dieses Dokument als nützlich ein?

Sind diese Inhalte unangemessen?

Copyright:

Verfügbare Formate

Clean Development Mechanism

Hochgeladen von

Copyright:

Verfügbare Formate

PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM-SSC-PDD)

CDM Executive Board