Opinion Letters Published: January 1, 2015 02:36 IST | Updated: January 1, 2015 02:36 IST
Land Act ordinance
The ordinance to amend the Right to Fair Compensation, Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (Editorial, and Fencing the farmer out, both Dec.31) might pave the way for faster and easier land acquisition for infrastructure-related projects. Although such projects might ensure speedy development of local areas, they will also have an impact on the lives of the people as far as their rehabilitation is concerned. Governments must remember that development needs to be more inclusive and participatory. Ashutosh Dalal, Bulandshahr, Uttar Pradesh Development may be the need of the hour but it should not be at the cost of large sections of society being affected. India is a developing country and largely reliant on agriculture. Therefore, there needs to be a provision to exempt fertile land from acquisition for any type of project. Sundeep Kumar Singh, Allahabad A reading of the items included under what constitutes fast track shows they are essential, unlike what Mr. Jairam Ramesh and Mr. Muhammad Khan have argued in their article. Those who want progress should not raise objections as those affected constitute a minuscule percentage of the total populace. A few people may have to lose something for the general benefit of society. I do not see the need to get upset over amendments that are still at a formative stage. K. Rajendran, Chennai The article appears to be more about political and moralistic posturing than a reasoned critique. The writers have conveniently skipped the reason why the government was forced to tweak the law. The Act brought forward by the UPA government, notwithstanding its professed noble intentions, had virtually stalled land acquisition for many projects. The UPA government used policymaking as a political tool to bolster its image as a champion of the downtrodden, without bothering to consider the practical implications of thrusting feel good and impractical polices on the nation. Which is better? A land acquisition process that helps the farmer to sell his land, if he wants to do so, at market rates, or an obstructionist piece of legislation that neither benefits the farmer nor helps stalled projects to take off? At the same time, the government must not use the amended law as a licence to forcibly takeover farm lands. V.N. Mukundarajan, Thiruvananthapuram Keywords: Land Act ordinance, economic reforms, economic development, land justice, land acquisition, SIA process Printable version | Jan 18, 2015 12:27:02 AM | http://www.thehindu.com/opinion/letters/land-act-ordinance /article6743104.ece The Hindu
Anti Corruption Branch of Delhi Has Jurisdiction To Entertain and Act On Complaint Against Delhi Police Officer or Official Under Prevention of Corruption Act: Delhi HC