Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
244
245
Table 1
Antimicrobial resistance rates of Escherichia coli (E coli) isolates from women with acute
uncomplicated cystitis in North America
Period Site
Study
year
NA
NA
NA
0.5
30
17
0.2
26
20
1
0
0
0
29
34
25
54
45
15
0
0.6
0
0.2
39
25
15
8
0.1
31
38
1
0.2
0
0
0.2
0
32
34
29
32
28
49
26
48
40
NA
0.1
3
1.2
1
41
31
NA
59
0.7
NA
17
246
Fig. 1. Trends in resistance rates of Escherichia coli isolated from female subjects with acute
uncomplicated cystitis. Data represent weighted averages from studies listed in Table 1.
247
248
249
250
251
Determinants of resistance
There is limited understanding of the individual risk factors associated
with having a TMP-SMX-resistant E coli UTI. Most studies that have
evaluated this issue have done so retrospectively via chart review or as
secondary analysis. Interesting, despite these limitations, most of these
studies have been consistent in their ndings regarding the main risk factors
for having a TMP-SMX-resistant UTI. Wright et al conducted a case
control study of patients being evaluated at a hospital emergency room for
symptoms of cystitis. Diabetes, recent hospitalization, current use of
any antibiotic, and current or recent use of TMP-SMX were independently
associated with TMP-SMX resistance. After excluding patients who were
recently hospitalized, diabetes was no longer associated with resistance.
TMP-SMX use was the strongest predictor of TMP-SMX resistance in this
study, with a vefold increased risk of TMP-SMX resistance among patients
who were currently using TMP-SMX or had used it in the past 3 months.
More recently, Brown et al found in a retrospective analysis that use of an
antimicrobial other than TMP-SMX within 2 weeks of a UTI diagnosis was
associated with a twofold increased risk of having a TMP-SMX-resistant
uropathogen. Use of TMP-SMX in the preceding 2 weeks was associated
with a 17 fold increased risk of resistance. Undoubtedly, some of the female
patients who had used TMP-SMX in the preceding 2 weeks had done so for
a TMP-SMX-resistant UTI and had returned because of therapeutic failure;
however, many of the women in the study were experiencing their rst UTI.
In addition, a history of recurrent UTI, dened as 3 or more UTIs during
the past 12 months, was not independently associated with resistance,
similar to the ndings of Wright et al.
Thus, there is ample evidence suggesting that current or recent use of
TMP-SMX increases the risk that a patient with acute cystitis is infected
252
253
254
Emerging issues
Fluoroquinolone resistance in uncomplicated urinary tract infections
The increase in TMP-SMX resistance among community-acquired UTI
isolates has led some clinicians to use uoroquinolones for these infections
[56]. One major concern about this practice is that increased prescribing of
uoroquinolones has been linked in several studies to increased uoroquinolone resistance in urinary E coli [44,5759]. Most of these studies have
focused on E coli isolates from hospitalized patients or from patients with
complicated UTI. Studies of uoroquinolone use in women with acute
uncomplicated cystitis have, to date, not demonstrated an emergence of
uoroquinolone resistance after short-course (3-day) use. In fact, even a 10day course of noroxacin for treatment of acute uncomplicated cystitis did
not result in selection of resistant E coli in the fecal or vaginal ora [60].
Both 3- and 7-day courses of ooxacin for acute uncomplicated cystitis
likewise did not result in the demonstration of resistant rectal E coli [11].
These studies may have been too small, however, to demonstrate a low rate
of selection pressure toward uoroquinolone-resistant E coli associated with
short-term uoroquinolone use. On a population basis, it is likely that usage
of uoroquinolones for acute uncomplicated cystitis is going to contribute
to the problem of resistance to these drugs. We recently demonstrated the
emergence of a ciprooxacin-resistant E coli strain in the fecal ora of
an otherwise healthy woman who was treated with a 3-day course of
ciprooxacin for treatment of acute uncomplicated cystitis (K. Gupta, T.M.
Hooton, and W.E. Stamm; unpublished data). Reports from other countries
of increasing uoroquinolone resistance among community E coli isolates
are probably partially caused by use of these drugs for uncomplicated UTIs
[15,61]. The emergence of this resistance will probably further complicate
the management of uncomplicated UTIs over the next decade.
Multi-drug resistance
Resistance of E coli to three or more antimicrobials has traditionally been
a concern primarily in nosocomial infections. Two studies have now shown,
however, that multi-drug resistance (MDR) is a phenomenon in communityacquired urinary E coli isolates as well. A US-based national survey of UTI
isolates from 2000 demonstrated that 7.1% of E coli isolates were resistant
to 3 or more of the 5 drugs tested [40]. Many of the isolates were from
outpatient sources, although the rate of MDR E coli from acute uncomplicated cystitis cases is not specically reported. There was a higher
likelihood of MDR among E coli from complicated UTIs, ie, from males,
patients over 65 years of age, and inpatients. The majority (58%) of MDR
E coli cases in this study were resistant to ampicillin, cephalothin, and TMPSMX. Resistance to these agents and to ciprooxacin was the next most
common phenotype identied. The rate of MDR E coli also varied
255
Acknowledgments
The author has received speaking honoraria, grant support, or consulting
fees from Bayer Pharmaceutical, Ortho McNeil, and Procter & Gamble, Inc.
References
[1] Hooton TM, Stam WE. Management of acute uncomplicated urinary tract infection in
adults. Med Clin North Am 1991;75(2):33957.
[2] Warren JW, Abrutyn E, Hebel JR, Johnson JR, Schaeer AJ, Stamm WE. Guidelines for
antimicrobial treatment of uncomplicated acute bacterial cystitis and acute pyelonephritis
in women. Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA). Clin Infect Dis 1999;29(4):
745758.
[3] McCarty JM, Richard G, Huck W, Tucker RM, Tosiello RL, Shan M, et al. A randomized
trial of short-course ciprooxacin, ooxacin, or trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole for the
treatment of acute urinary tract infection in women. Ciprooxacin Urinary Tract Infection
Group. Am J Med 1999;106(3):2929.
[4] Dyer IE, Sankary TM, Dawson JA. Antibiotic resistance in bacterial urinary tract
infections, 1991 to 1997. West J Med 1998;169(5):2658.
[5] Gupta K, Scholes D, Stamm WE. Increasing prevalence of antimicrobial resistance among
uropathogens causing acute uncomplicated cystitis in women. JAMA 1999;281(8):7368.
256
[6] Brown PD, Freeman A, Foxman B. Prevalence and predictors of trimethoprimsulfamethoxazole resistance among uropathogenic Escherichia coli isolates in Michigan.
Clin Infect Dis 2002;34(8):10616.
[7] Gupta K, Hooton TM, Wobbe CL, Stamm WE. The prevalence of antimicrobial resistance
among uropathogens causing acute uncomplicated cystitis in young women. Int J
Antimicrob Agents 1999;11(34):3058.
[8] Gupta K, Sahm DF, Mayeld D, Stamm WE. Antimicrobial resistance among
uropathogens that cause community-acquired urinary tract infections in women: a
nationwide analysis. Clin Infect Dis 2001;33(1):8994.
[9] Zhanel GG, Karlowsky JA, Harding GK, Carrie A, Mazzulli T, Low DE, et al. A
Canadian national surveillance study of urinary tract isolates from outpatients:
comparison of the activities of trimethoprim- sulfamethoxazole, ampicillin, mecillinam,
nitrofurantoin, and ciprooxacin. The Canadian Urinary Isolate Study Group. Antimicrob
Agents Chemother 2000;44(4):108992.
[10] Karlowsky JA, Jones ME, Thornsberry C, Critchley I, Kelly LJ, Sahm DF. Prevalence of
antimicrobial resistance among urinary tract pathogens isolated from female outpatients
across the US in 1999. Int J Antimicrob Agents 2001;18(2):1217.
[11] Hooton TM, Latham RH, Wong ES, Johnson C, Roberts PL, Stamm WE. Ooxacin
versus trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole for treatment of acute cystitis. Antimicrob Agents
Chemother 1989;33(8):130812.
[12] Hooton TM, Stamm WE. Diagnosis and treatment of uncomplicated urinary tract
infection. Infect Dis Clin North Am 1997;11(3):55181.
[13] Stein GE, Mummaw N, Goldstein EJ, Boyko EJ, Reller LB, Kurtz TO, et al. A multicenter
comparative trial of three-day noroxacin vs ten-day sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim
for the treatment of uncomplicated urinary tract infections. Arch Intern Med 1987;
147(10):17602.
[14] Karlowsky JA, Kelly LJ, Thornsberry C, Jones ME, Sahm DF. Trends in antimicrobial
resistance among urinary tract infection isolates of Escherichia coli from female outpatients
in the United States. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2002;46(8):25405.
[15] Kahlmeter G. The ECO.SENS Project: a prospective, multinational, multicentre
epidemiological survey of the prevalence and antimicrobial susceptibility of urinary tract
pathogensinterim report. J Antimicrob Chemother 2000;46(Suppl 1):1522.
[16] Turnidge J, Bell J, Biedenbach DJ, Jones RN. Pathogen occurrence and antimicrobial
resistance trends among urinary tract infection isolates in the Asia-Western Pacic Region:
report from the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program, 19981999. Int J Antimicrob Agents 2002;20(1):107.
[17] Raz R, Chazan B, Kennes Y, Colodner R, Rottensterich E, Dan M, et al. Empiric use of
trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) in the treatment of women with uncomplicated urinary tract infections, in a geographical area with a high prevalence of TMP-SMXresistant uropathogens. Clin Infect Dis 2002;34(9):11659.
[18] Colodner R, Keness Y, Chazan B, Raz R. Antimicrobial susceptibility of community-acquired uropathogens in northern Israel. Int J Antimicrob Agents 2001;18(2):
18992.
[19] Gales AC, Jones RN, Gordon KA, Sader HS, Wilke WW, Beach ML, et al. Activity and
spectrum of 22 antimicrobial agents tested against urinary tract infection pathogens in
hospitalized patients in Latin America: report from the second year of the SENTRY
antimicrobial surveillance program (1998). J Antimicrob Chemother 2000;45(3):295303.
[20] Prosser BL, Beskid G. Multicenter in vitro comparative study of uoroquinolones against
25,129 gram-positive and gram-negative clinical isolates. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis
1995;21(1):3345.
[21] Hoban DJ, Bouchillon SK, Johnson JL, Zhanel GG, Butler DL, Miller LA, et al.
Comparative in vitro activity of gemioxacin, ciprooxacin, levooxacin and ooxacin in
a North American surveillance study. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 2001;40(12):5157.
257
258
259