0 Bewertungen0% fanden dieses Dokument nützlich (0 Abstimmungen)
45 Ansichten2 Seiten
The Bomber group gelled as a family and there was hardly any administration from top down in place. Thus many people in the squadron were very lax and displayed a negative attitude to the job. During ball bearing strike the administration was largely objective driven. Everyone in the team knew their roles and did not need a leader to push them.
The Bomber group gelled as a family and there was hardly any administration from top down in place. Thus many people in the squadron were very lax and displayed a negative attitude to the job. During ball bearing strike the administration was largely objective driven. Everyone in the team knew their roles and did not need a leader to push them.
The Bomber group gelled as a family and there was hardly any administration from top down in place. Thus many people in the squadron were very lax and displayed a negative attitude to the job. During ball bearing strike the administration was largely objective driven. Everyone in the team knew their roles and did not need a leader to push them.
Administrative context was an informal one. Even though there were formal structures in place, the entire Bomber group gelled as a family and consequentially there was hardly any administration from top down in place. Behaviour and Performance: Thus many people in the squadron were very lax and displayed a negative attitude to the job. This resulted in poor performances with the squadron often missing targets while losing
After Savage Takes over
Administrative context: The administration was very formal and strict once Savage took over. There was a need to enforce rules and make the people sweat and get back to shape. The administration style was top down and was adopted with the assumption that people inherently do not like to work. Behaviour and Performance: Many people were moved out of their comfort zone. This initially led to resentment and transfer requests. However, the
During ball bearing Strike
Administrative context: The administration during the ball bearing strike was largely objective driven. Everyone in the team knew their roles and did not need a leader to push them. In that sense, the team had come a full circle as they were egged on by their internal motivation rather than a leader having to tell them Behaviour and Performance: The team was extremely resilient and a fiery unit. They behaved as brothers in war. Their behaviour was driven by single minded objectiveness and they were successful in such a dangerous mission only due to the