189 views

Uploaded by ffefffe

abaqus

- virtual laboratory
- Finite
- catiaportfolio
- eot rane
- Vibro-Acoustical Analysis and Design of a Multiple-layer Constrai
- 08CHAPTER_1
- On Cavalieri's Conjecture
- MA311-2
- JournalNX- bridge-deck
- HyperMesh for FE Modeling
- 310f27f290e34a6392b5974c7f756810
- 2016 CV of Waseem Ahmad
- Seminar10 FEM CST
- 573816387_toc
- Chapter 2
- An Essay to Introduction of Differential Geometry and Applications
- 06_02 (5)
- Sem 2
- 2.7,+8.1+Material
- Fae 10056

You are on page 1of 8

The objective of this lab is to combine ABAQUS and PATRAN to analyze the problem of a cantilever plate

under a spatially varying normal pressure. We will compare the response of a simple plate with that of a

reinforced plate. The new concepts introduced in this lab session are

- direct generation of rectangular surfaces with PATRAN

- applying normal pressure-type boundary condition

- 6-node triangular plate elements

- concept of spatial field and PCL programming language

Important preliminary note : the mesh of the reinforced plate will be used in the next lab session, so it is

important to save the session file.

2. Problem description

In this first example, we will examine the effect of adding ribs to a simple plate structure subjected to a non-

uniform pressure.

Consider the plate represented in Figure 1. Its thickness is 0.5 cm. It is made of Aluminum (E=70 GPa,

ν=0.3). It is subjected to a spatially varying normal pressure p(x,y) given by

where x and y are given in cm. The plate is clamped (i.e., zero deflection and zero slope) along the side x=0

and free along the other three edges.

p(x,y)

100 cm

y

50 cm

Figure 1.

The second problem is similar to the first one (same dimensions, boundary conditions, material and plate

thickness). The only difference is the presence of 4 reinforcements (or “ribs”) placed along the bottom

surface in the x-direction (Figure 2). Each reinforcement has a thickness of 0.2 cm.

1

x

z

10 cm 10 cm

•A

y 5 cm

•B

Figure 2.

A) First problem.

The creation of the geometry and finite element mesh for the first problem is very simple. Most steps of

the pre-processing phase (such as the definition of the material properties, load cases, ...) are similar to those

of the previous lab, and will therefore not be detailed here. The only “tricky” part is the creation is the

application of the spatially varying pressure on the top surface. In PATRAN, non-uniform pressure (or

thickness or material properties, ...) are defined with the help of “fields”, which are usually spatially varying

functions introduced by the user.

u Geometry

Generate the rectangular surface directly with, for example, Create/Surface/XYZ with a Vector Coordinate

List of <100 50 0> and an origin [0 0 0].

u Fields

Before introducing the boundary conditions, we must define a spatial scalar field to describe the varying

pressure, using Create/Spatial/PCL Function. Enter a field name, and the scalar function with 1.e-7 * ‘X

* (100. - ‘X) * ‘Y * (50. - ‘Y) . Don’t forget to use upper case letters for the coordinates, and the single

(forward) quote (i.e., the same key as for the double quote character ) before X and Y. Check your input with

the Show option. Specify the range (0≤x<100 and 0≤y≤50).

u Load/BCs

Enter the displacement boundary conditions (no displacements and no rotations) along x=0.

Then Create/Pressure/Element Variable with Target Element Type=2D. In the Input Data, apply the

pre-defined spatial field to the upper surface (Top Surf Pressure) of the plate. Finally, select the whole

rectangular plate as the application region.

2

u Finite Elements

We will use 6-node triangular elements on the surface. Use uniform mesh seeds. Try to create a “well

balanced mesh”, i.e., avoid elongated triangles. After creating the mesh, don’t forget to optimize your mesh.

u Properties

Enter the type of element (2D shell) and the appropriate thickness.

u Analysis

Perform the whole analysis with ABAQUS from within PATRAN. While the program is running, check the

content of the ABAQUS input file (‘.inp’).

When the analysis is completed, read the results and move on to the post-processing phase. Write down the

maximum deflection and obtain the stress distribution in the plate.

Second problem.

We will keep the finite geometry of the first problem and the pre-defined spatial field. Delete the mesh

seeds and finite element mesh.

u Geometry

1) Define the two points A [0 10 0] and B [0 10 -5]

2) Define a curve AB between these two points

3) Define the first reinforcement by extruding the curve AB in the x-direction by a vector <100 0 0>

4) Define the other curves with the Transform/Surface/Translate command (with a Translation

Vector of <0 10 0> and a Repeat Count=3).

u Load/BCs

u Finite Elements

We want to use 6-node triangles on the plate surface and 8-node quads on the 4 reinforcements. Define your

mesh seeds such that the elements and nodes match at the intersections between the plate and the

reinforcements (see suggested mesh attached to this hand-out). If the viewport becomes too crowded, remove

the hidden lines with Display/Entity Types... Render Style=Hidden Line.

Delete the redundant nodes and optimize your node numbering. To be sure that the mesh is fine, use the

Verify/Element/Boundaries command. Only the external boundaries should appear on the viewport.

The mesh should look similar to that shown in Figure 3.

3

Figure 3. Mesh for reinforced plate problem

u Properties

Enter the appropriate element thickness along the plate (0.5 cm) and on the reinforcements (0.2 cm).

After performing the analysis, check how much the maximum deflection has changed. Examine also how

the presence of the stiffeners affects the stress distribution in your structure.

The second problem also involves surface elements : but, in this case, we will examine 3D surfaces with the

aid of shell elements. The geometry of the problem to be analyzed is shown in Figure 4 and involves a

simple 3D wing structure subjected to a variable pressure load applied on its top surface to simulate flight load

(lift) conditions. Two new PATRAN tools will be used to create the geometry : we will use cubic splines to

define the cross-section profile and the extrude with scaling action to define the wing.

4

u Geometry

Create the points 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 at locations (0,0,0), (6,3.5,0), (12.5,5,0), (15,5,0), (30,3.5,0), and

(50,0,0), respectively (Figure 5). These points will serve as the “anchor points” for the cubic splines.

The “tail” of the wing is assumed to be linear : therefore, just use Create/Curve/Point to make a line

between points 5 and 6.

Figure 5

Start Point Tangent vector = <0,0,0>

Point List = Point 1:4

Apply

This will create a smooth curve through points 1,2,3 and 4 with the end of the curve tangent to the vector

<1,0,0>. Now do the same to create the last curve, except use End Point tangent vector = <-1,0,0>, and

Point List = Point 5:4.

Note: You could have created a single curve through all of the points rather than three separate curves. The

reason that this was not done will become evident later in the lab.

We will now create three surfaces using the Create/Surface/Extrude command. Use the following

parameters.

Scale Factor = .7

These parameters define how the top half of the wing is created. The wing half span and sweep angle were

determined by the Translation Vector, and the taper ratio was determined by the Scale Factor. So for this

example the wing half span is 200 inches long with no leading edge sweep, and the taper ratio is .7.

Now go to the Quick pick tool bar and select the Iso1 View to get a better look at the current geometry

(Figure 6).

5

Figure 6

Since the wing uses a symmetrical airfoil, the lower wing surface can be created by making a mirror image of

the top surface using the X-Z plane for the mirror plane. To do this use Transform/Surface/Mirror and

define the mirror plane normal as the vector { [ 0 0 0 ] [ 0 1 0 ] } (or, more simply, select the y-axis). Your

geometry should be similar to that presented in Figure 4.

u Load/BCs

Fix the translations and rotations on all of the curves at z=0, and then use Create/Pressure/Element

Uniform to apply a pressure defined by the spatial field above to the top surfaces of the wing. It is likely

that some areas have the pressure applied in the opposite direction. The reason for this has to do with the

normal vectors of the surface in question. We want all of the pressures acting upward (positive y direction).

The easiest way to accomplish this is to simply reverse the direction of the surface normal using u

Geometry Edit/Surface/Reverse.

u Finite Elements

20 along each spanwise curve

3 along chordwise curves at the leading edge

3 along the “middle” chordwise curves

2 along the chordwise curves at the trailing edge

6

Figure 7. Mesh used in wing problem

Before we mesh the geometry, we might want to create a few new groups to help us during the results phase.

Use Group/create to make two new groups. We will use one for the top of the wing, and the other for the

bottom. When this is completed, look at the text at the top of the viewport. The name of the “current”

group will be contained on this line. We want the group to be used for the bottom of the wing to be the

current group. If this is not the case, use Group/Set Current to make the proper group current.

Now that the group is set, mesh the three surfaces that comprise the bottom surface of the wing using Quad 8

elements. Repeat this for the top surface making sure to change the “current” group.

u Results

Select the appropriate load case, fringe result and deformation result. You will note that it is difficult to see

the deformation and fringe results for the bottom surface. To view only the results for the bottom surface,

use Group/post and select only the group relating to the bottom surface, refresh the display using the button

in the upper right corner of the screen and then reapply the results selections. This can also be applied to

the top surface in the same manner.

Conclusion As can be seen from the deformation, this is not a good wing design for the given loading

condition, as the top part of the wing deforms too much. Try to improve this by adding two spars to the

model. Below is a summary of the steps necessary to add the spars.

7

1.) Create two lines one between points (15,5,0) and (15,-5,0), the other between points (30,3.5,0) and

(30,-3.5,0).

2.) Extrude these curves using the same parameters as before.

3.) Mesh the new surfaces. (Don’t forget to put the spars in a separate group.)

4.) Equivalence and optimize the mesh

5.) Re-run the analysis.

This will improve the results, but they will still be unsatisfactory for the given load. When you view the

results you will see why actual wing structures have internal ribs. A geometry that contains skins, spars and

ribs would be too complex for the limited time available during these sessions.

- virtual laboratoryUploaded byArie Febry Fardheny, MT
- FiniteUploaded byAshley Silvester Anthony
- catiaportfolioUploaded byapi-354933597
- eot raneUploaded byjana perumal
- Vibro-Acoustical Analysis and Design of a Multiple-layer ConstraiUploaded byMd. Zillur Rahman
- 08CHAPTER_1Uploaded byEka Suprianto
- On Cavalieri's ConjectureUploaded bySreekar Saha
- MA311-2Uploaded byzohaib_545
- JournalNX- bridge-deckUploaded byJournalNX - a Multidisciplinary Peer Reviewed Journal
- HyperMesh for FE ModelingUploaded bydvarsastry
- 310f27f290e34a6392b5974c7f756810Uploaded byJorge Luis Garcia Zuñiga
- 2016 CV of Waseem AhmadUploaded byWaseem Ahmad
- Seminar10 FEM CSTUploaded byAndrei Cioroianu
- 573816387_tocUploaded byxavierjeff
- Chapter 2Uploaded byDonald Toledo
- An Essay to Introduction of Differential Geometry and ApplicationsUploaded byAmir Mosavi
- 06_02 (5)Uploaded byTranNguyen
- Sem 2Uploaded byVinay Kumar
- 2.7,+8.1+MaterialUploaded byIan Fajardo
- Fae 10056Uploaded byhoneyb
- 31.pdfUploaded byabhishek
- Pairings for BeginnersUploaded byli_wuen
- 9783642119392-c2Uploaded byHuy
- Analysis of a Sponge Rubber using FEA MethodUploaded byIRJET Journal
- Coupled Thermal – StructuralUploaded bysuneel_magunta
- Finite Element Methods in Mechanical DesignUploaded byroscilla
- Me SyllabusUploaded bySharath Gupta
- 33pop Vitek Hajek 2 NewUploaded byCornel Bica
- A Computer Program for Dynamic Load Simulation of Spur Gears With AsymmetricUploaded byభుక్య వెంకటేష్
- InequalitiesUploaded byGabrielGita

- CAPE PureMath-Units 1 and 2Uploaded byDarnell Gracen
- syllabus cfd.pdfUploaded byAttique Javaid
- Trial Kelantan SPM 2012 MathsUploaded bySiah Woan Chiou
- MAE563 Bar and TrussUploaded byastrobarby
- Form 4 - 2007 - Module - Terengganu - Additional Mathematics - 05.pdfUploaded byZacky Mhd
- Numbers. Divisibility Tests, HCF and LCMUploaded byAjay Bhat
- Problem Set 2 SolUploaded bysristisagar
- Signal Flow GraphUploaded bysymbo11
- mai growth points reportUploaded byapi-380350226
- Robert of Chesters 00 k HuwUploaded byIsmael Cabello Carrillo
- AHSME 1999 SolutionsUploaded byjabagawee
- Phil SatUploaded byAngelo Andro Suan
- NameUploaded byapi-19562657
- Combinatorial EnumerationUploaded byKiran Kumar Kuppa
- Chapter 01 IntroductionUploaded byTina Philip
- 4.2 Mean Value TheoremUploaded byRaju Sharma
- bansal-classes-maths- By EasyEngineering.net.pdfUploaded byHarsh kumar Meerut
- Contour of a Bumpless Mecanum RollerUploaded byetherjones
- Pre Ch3 ReviewUploaded byReg Brigham
- Continuous Time Review CochraneUploaded bySophie Béreau
- The purpose of simple linear regression analysis is to.docxUploaded byumut
- Chapter 5.pdfUploaded byAbay Tana
- Qm 2013 Summer - Sample Test 01 of Final ExaminationUploaded byPerfectionism Follower
- Stress Strain PaperUploaded byRajni Sharma
- Chapter15.pdfUploaded byMahmoud Reda ElSherif
- Notes on Guenter Lee PDEs.pdfUploaded by123chess
- MIT2 017JF09 ControlUploaded bybalu402
- Human Design the Science of DifferentiationUploaded bydan-marius
- Seminar ReportUploaded byNitish Kumar
- Matlab Lab 1Uploaded byadane21