Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
the analysis of the site (bioclimatic studies- solar control, natural light; urban
studies, opportunities, all of which will be shown with conclusions)
Illustration of the interventions concept of sustainability
a. eco compatible intervention principles resulting from previous studies
b. functional, ambiental control and intervention strategies represented through
schemes, relations, technological choices, equipment, etc (ex. Google search
image: architecture
sustainability diagram)
c. evaluation proposition of project sustainability (LEED, BREEAM,etc.). Using
spherical diagrams the following will be presented using a notation system going
from +3 to -3: the air and atmospheric impact (climatic factors, stored energy,
used energy, minimization of energy loss, using energy from renewable sources,
transport/mobility); water impact, soil impact, flora and fauna impact, cultural
factors impact, human impact, community impact (see anex 1)
the drawn pieces needed to completely and clearly express the layout and
solution be they generic or specific
Stage 3: the developing of the study
The final deadline will be accompanied by an oral presentation of the projects on
19th may 2014 starting at 10.00 AM. The following pieces are mandatory:
Written parts:
architectural presentation
Drawn parts:
presentation of the projects sustainability concept
area plan sc. 1:2000
site plan sc. 1:500 / 1:1000
ground floor plan sc. 1:100 / 1:200
different level plans sc. 1:50 / 1:100
characteristic sections sc. 1:50 / 1:100
facades sc. 1:50 / 1:100
details of joining (plan, section and view) sc. 1:20
three (3) specific details (1 detail = a subassembly determined by at least two
orthogonal projections) (sc. 1:10 or 1:5, depending on the detailing need)
Note: all pieces will be paged on A2 landscape. There are exceptions when
A1 landscape is admitted only if the dimension of the project cant be done
otherwise. The drawings will be saved and delivered digitally as .pdf or .jpg. by
neglecting to do so will cause an one point deduction from the final grade.
5. Evaluation method:
The content and quality of the activity during class will be noted by the tutors in
the students individual chart. The final evaluation consists in the presentation
of the work made by the students.
Observations:
the promotion of this project is conditioned by having at least 6 discussions for
each student;
the project that best fits the objectives will be featured in the magazine Igloo
Habitat&Arhitectur;
6. Project schedule:
17.02.2014 (week 1) official launch of project and group forming
24.02.2014 (week 2) class discussions
03.03.2014 (week 3) deadline and presentation stage 1- preliminary research
10.03.2014 (week 4) class discussions
17.03.2014 (week 5) class discussions
24.03.2014 (week 6) deadline and presentation stage 2- before hand study
31.03.2014 (week 7) class discussions
07.04.2014 (week 8) class discussions
14.04.2014 (week 9) class discussions
21.04.2014 02.05.2014 break for practice activities
05.05.2014 (week 10) class discussions
12.05.2014 (week 11) class discussions
19.05.2014 (week 12) deadline and presentation stage 3- the developing of the
study
VII. Minimal bibliography:
CROWTHER, Richard L., ECOLOGIC ARCHITECTURE, ButtrworthHeinemann
1992;
SLESSOR, Catherine, ECO TECH, Sustainable Architecture and High
Technology,
Thames and Hudson;
WATSON, Donald, FAIA, and Kenneth LABS, CLIMATIC DESIGN; SOLAR
ARCHITECTURE
IN EUROPE, Design, Performance and Evaluation, PrismPress1991
Note: generally the bibliography of the courses in Construction Physics and
Architectural eco technology. In particular, the finding and selecting of
bibliographic reference adequate for the specific studied case is an obligation of
the student and it represents an evaluation criteria of the present work