Prosiding ARKN 2014

Proceeding
ASEAN
REGIONAL KNOWLEDGE NETWORK on
FOREST and CLIMATE CHANGE
( ARKN - FCC )
Proceeding
ASEAN
REGIONAL KNOWLEDGE NETWORK on
( ARKN-FCC )
ARKN-FCC Secretariat
Centre for Standardization and Environment
Manggala Wanabakti Building Block VII 8th Floor
Jl. Jenderal Gatot Subroto - Senayan
Jakarta INDONESIA
Tel/Fax : +6221 5733433
E-mail : pustanling@dephut.go.id,

pustanling@yahoo.com
Website : www.staneclime.org

Ministry of Forestry
2014
Proceeding
ASEAN REGIONAL
KNOWLEDGE NETWORK on
( ARKN-FCC )

2014
FOREWORDS
ASEAN Regional Knowledge Network on Forest and Climate Change (ARKN-FCC) was
established upon the approval of ASEAN Senior Officials on Forestry (ASOF) in 2008.
ARKN-FCC operates under ASOF guidance and comply with ASEAN principles including
mutual respect and effective cooperation. ARKN-FCC work program 2013-2015
focused on 3 (three) main areas: policy issues, capacity building, and communication.
Through ARKN-FCC, information, experiences and lessons including challenges relating
to REDD+ are shared and possible common issues are addressed regionally and used
as the basis for developing common positions for UNFCCC negotiations. The common
positions on REDD+ that were successfully developed through ARKN-FCC are important
contributions to COP decisions on REDD+.
In 2014, ARKN-FCC held its the 8th Meeting on 4-6 March 2014 in Bali, Indonesia
which aimed to discuss relevant issues on forest and climate change/ REDD+ to
be included in AMS joint submission of views to the Secretariat of UNFCCC, and
prepare draft submission to be forwarded to ASOF Leaders and National Focal Points
through ASEAN Secretariat, facilitated by the ARKN-FCC Focal Points and members.
In cooperation with the Deutsche Gesellschaft fr Internationale Zusammenarbeit
(GIZ) GmbH through the ASEAN-German Programme on Response to Climate Change
(GAPCC) and the Ministry of Forestry of the Republic of Indonesia, ARKN-FCC also
co-organized the 9th Annual Meeting of ARKN-FCC was conducted on 7-8 May 2014
in Tangerang, Indonesia.
This proceeding is served as documentation of the two ASEAN Regional Knowledge
Network on Forest and Climate Change meetings mentioned above. With the publishing
of this proceeding, we would like to express our gratitude to all parties who has
contributed.
Coordinator
ASEAN Regional Knowledge Network on Forest and Climate Change
PROCEEDING
ASEAN REGIONAL KNOWLEDGE NETWORK on
FOREST and CLIMATE CHANGE (ARKN-FCC) 2014
I
BACKGROUND
ASEAN is a political and economic organization which is based regionally consist of ten
members 10 (ten) countries in Southeast Asia (Brunei Darussalam, Cambodia, Indonesia,
Lo-PDR, Malaysia, Myanmar, Philippines, Singapore, Thailand, and Vietnam). ASEAN
covers a land area of 4.46 million km2 and has a population of approximately 600 million
people. ASEAN Member States (AMS) collectively own 283.2 million ha of forests. Despite
the diversity in forest area and forest resources management, the region shares common
cultural values, biodiversity richness, dependency of local people on forest resources, and
vulnerability to climate change.
ARKN-FCC as one of Subsidiary Bodies under ASEAN Senior Officials on Forestry (ASOF)
has aim defending ASEAN position and contribute to international processes. ARKNFCC positions are built on areas that ASEAN has in common, acknowledge diversity and
differences among AMS, and respect uniqueness of individual AMS. ARKN-FCC carries
out the following tasks : (1) Responding to emerging issues on forests and climate
change arising from the work programmes of ASOF and AMAF, and from regional and
international processes that are relevant to ASEAN Member States; (2) Creating and
supporting a regional pool of expertise/experts in ASEAN to undertake policy analysis and
research on forests and climate change issues from the perspective of ASEAN Member
States; (3) Mobilizing resources and building partnerships to set up and coordinate
collaborative research projects that are of interest to ASEAN Member States and
facilitating the exchange of research results; and (4) Enhancing policy implementation
by capacity building to further strengthen the implementation of forests and climate
change activities in ASEAN Member States, taking into account the different level of
socio-economic development and forest resources among ASEAN Member States; and
Providing a platform for non-official stakeholders and the broader research community to
enhance forests and climate change policy processes in ASEAN.
ARKN-FCC held annual meeting in order to carry out the task and evaluate progress.
During first semester of 2014, ARKN-FCC held 8th ARKN annual meeting which was held
on 4-6 March 2014 in Bali, Indonesia and the 9th ARKN annual meeting held on 7-8 May
2014 in Tangerang, Indonesia.
PROCEEDING
II
THE 8TH ANNUAL MEETING OF ASEAN REGIONAL
KNOWLEDGE NETWORK ON FOREST AND
CLIMATE CHANGE
2.1. INTRODUCTION
Following up the ASOF guidance in its 16th meeting, and as part of the annual work
programme, the Office of Coordinator of ARKN-FCC and ASEAN Secretariat, supported
by ASEAN-German Programme on Response to Climate Change (GAPCC) and the
Ministry of Forestry of the Republic of Indonesia through Forest Carbon Partnership
Facility (FCPF), has organized THE 8th MEETING OF ASEAN REGIONAL KNOWLEDGE
NETWORK ON FOREST AND CLIMATE CHANGE (ARKN-FCC) in Bali, Indonesia, from
4-6 March 2014. The objectives of the meeting were the following : (1) to discuss
relevant issues on FCC/REDD+ to be included in AMS joint submission of views to
the Secretariat of UNFCCC, and prepare draft submission to be forwarded to ASOF
Leaders and National Focal Points through ASEAN Secretariat, facilitated by the
ARKN-FCC Focal Points and members; (2) to evaluate the progress/achievement in
implementing ARKN-FCC Work Programme 2013-2015, other issues relating to ARKNFCC Work Programme 2013-2015, and priority for 2014 activities; (3) to review draft
Development of Decision Support Tool (DST) for identifying and addressing drivers
of deforestation and forest degradation in ASEAN region under ARKN-FCC LEAFUSAID, and (4) to review the output documents of the Project on Strengthening
ASEAN Mechanism for Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation
(REDD-Plus) under ASEAN-Australia Development Cooperation Programme Phase II
(AADCP II) 2012-2013. (agenda of the meeting as in ANNEX 1.1) .The meeting was
attended by thirty eight representatives from nine ASEAN Member States (Cambodia,
Indonesia, Lao PDR, Malaysia, Myanmar, the Philippines, Singapore, Thailand, and
Vietnam), representative of ASEAN Secretariat, and representative of GIZ GAP-CC (List
of participants as in ANNEX 1.2).
PROCEEDING
The opening session was started with the remarks by Mr. Dian Sukmajaya, the
Representative of the ASEAN Secretariat, who emphasized the importance of the
network in developing ASEAN common position for the UNFCCC process on REDD+,
as well as in strengthening the capacities of ASEAN member states. The ARKN-FCCs
crucial role was also acknowledged by Mr. Roman Roerhl, the representative of
GIZ GAP-CC. He also expressed continuous support of GIZ to the network. Dr. Nur
Masripatin, the Coordinator of ARKN-FCC stated in her remarks the success of ASEAN
through ARKN-FCC in bringing ASEAN common position into UNFCCC negotiations.
She also stated that the entry into ASEAN Economic Community in 2015 and the
latest development in UNFCCC negotiation brings about many consequences in many
relevant processes in ASEAN, including the work of ARKN-FCC, thus the meeting
will also review the ARKN-FCC Work-Programme 2013-2015 to anticipate relevant
emerging issues. The Meeting was officially opened by Dr. Ida Bagus Putera Parthama,
Acting Director General of Forestry Research and Development Agency, Ministry of
Forestry of the Republic of Indonesia, as the ASOF Leader of Indonesia. In his opening
remarks, the ASOF Leader of Indonesia, reminded the participants to finish the draft
submission on methodological guidance on REDD+ to the UNFCCC while reinforcing
the importance of this network towards 2015 ASEAN Economic Community and
UNFCCC agreement. The ASOF Leader of Indonesia also welcomed all participants and
wished the meeting successful (Remarks of the Opening Session as in ANNEX 1.3).
2.2. MEETING AND DISCUSSION

2.2.1. Discussion to Prepare Draft ASEAN Joint Submission on REDD+
Discussion to prepare draft ASEAN Joint Submission on REDD+ was facilitated by the
Coordinator of ARKN-FCC and representative of ASEAN Secretariat. The discussion was
guided by several key questions presented by Dr. Nur Masripatin as the Coordinator of
ARKN-FCC.
2.2.2. Issue Relating to Non-Carbon Benefits (NCBs)

On the issues relating to Non-Carbon Benefits (NCBs), participants discussed the
following three key questions : (1) How we define non carbon benefits?; (2) How
to measure non-carbon benefits cost effectively?; and (3) Has science and evidence
provided sufficient basis to measure non carbon benefits in certain degree of certainty
and cost effectiveness?. It was noted that NCBs vary significantly from country to
country. It would be difficult to set the definition at international level, and so, NCBs
should be nationally defined. It was also agreed that NCBs should not outweigh
carbon benefits which is needed to achieve the objectives of mitigation actions
through REDD+.
PROCEEDING
The basic view was that NCBs are more likely to be similar with ecosystem and
environmental services provided by forests. With the complexity of the issue and the
dynamic negotiation process under the UNFCCC, AMS is of the view that the issue
of NCBs need to be considered optional, which its implementation would be up to
each countrys consent. This view was also reinforced by the fact that existing REDD+
safeguards can also be considered as the perfect tool to address issues related to noncarbon benefits. It is up to the country to decide on methodology used for measuring
NCBs. Parties should be encouraged to develop or use existing methodology for NCBs,
and share experiences with other countries. Furthermore, international and regional
research cooperation should be enhanced for the development of NCBs.
2.2.3. Issue Relating to Non-Market based Approaches (NMA) and Joint

Mitigation-Adaptation (JMA)
There were five key questions as guidance for discussion which are as (1) How far the
concept of JMA is understood by Parties? Are Parties seeing JMA in the same way?;
(2) What methodologies are currently available in mitigation?; (3) How do we measure
adaptation impacts so far?; (4) What aspects that differentiate methodological guidance
for market and non market based approach?; and (5) What should be the focuss of SBSTA
40 discussion, considering that the discussion on both market and non-market based
approaches are still in preliminary stages?
Discussion on NMA is ongoing under different UNFCCC agenda, and issues relating to
non-market based approaches to support the implementation of REDD+ (Decision 1/
CP. 16 paragraph 70) have been reflected in decision 9./CP.19 on work programme on
results-based finance for REDD+.
Regarding adaptation in JMA, most countries already have National Action Plan on
Adaptations (NAPAs), but the methodology to measure impacts of adaptation has
yet to be defined. Furthermore, in many discussions, adaptation issue is viewed as
national issue. In this regards, the meeting recognized that the concept of JAM could
be understood, but is operationally complex. Therefore further discussion is needed to
clarify its applicability at the international setting, and suggest the in-session expert
meeting and SBSTA 40 to focus on this matter.
The Meeting agreed to forward the draft ASEAN joint submission on methodological
aspects of REDD+, on the issues relating to NMA-JMA and NCBs, to ASOF Leaders and
National Climate Change Focal Points of the respective ASEAN member states through
ASEAN Secretariat for endorsement before being submitted to the UNFCCC Secretariat
by 26 March 2014. (Draft submission as in ANNEX 1.4).
PROCEEDING
2.2.4. Review of the Work Programme of ARKN- FCC 2013-2015

The meeting reviewed the Work Programme of ARKN-FCC 2013-2015 and achievements,
emerging issues which require adjustment to the Work Programme 2013-2015. The
work programme 2013-2015 covers three following main areas : Policy, Capacity and
Communication. Activities that have been carried during 2013- March 2014, were
financed by Government of Indonesia through the Office of the ARKN-FCCC Coordinator
FCPF Programme, GIZ GAPCC and USAID-LEAF.
The Meeting agreed to cancel Activity under Main Area 2 (Capacity) : Regional capacity
climate proofing/ adaptation in forestry sector, as the activity has been included under
ASEAN multi-sectoral programme as a cross-sectoral issue. Furthermore, the meeting also
agreed to replace activity under Main Area 1 (Policy) : Policy dialogue on climate change
and forestry : e.g. conflict between forestry & agriculture with Policy dialogue on forest
and land sector, an emerging issue in UNFCCC negotiation under Ad Hoc Working
Group on Durban Platform for Enhanced Actions (ADP). On carbon accounting training
with USAID-LEAF support, upon the withdrawal of Malaysia to host the training, the
meeting welcome the initial intention of Lao-PDR to host the training. Final decision will
be made after consultation with relevant authorities in Lao-PDR and USAID-LEAF.
The meeting noted some challenges in carrying activities under main Area III
(Communication), especially on data based (allometric equations and emission factors)
and Web-portal on lessons learnt. Responding to this issue, Mr. Dian Sukmadjaja, the
representative of ASEAN Secretariat, proposed to re-launch the ASEAN Forest Clearing
House Mechanism, which has been developed through German-REFOP. Since there are
number of issues which need to be considered, this idea will be first discussed with ARKNFCC Coordinator and GIZ-GAPCC. The revised Work Programme 2013 - 2015 as in
ANNEX 3.5).
During the discussion, Mr. Roman Roerhl, GIZ- GAP-CC representative, reassured the
commitment of GIZ to continue supporting ARKN-FCC activities, including from 20152017 periods. The support could be the same like ones in the past, including ARKN-FCC
Coordination Meeting during the COP sessions up to COP-21 in Paris.
On the Forest Asia Event, co-organized by CIFOR and partners from 5-6 May 2014 in
Jakarta, Indonesia, the ARKN-FCC and GIZ-GAPCC will co-host a Technical Session under
Theme 3 (Climate change and biodiversity), with the topic entitled REDD+ POLICY
DEVELOPMENT AND IMPLEMENTATION : lessons from ASEAN. Six AMS (Cambodia,
Indonesia, Lao-PDR, Malaysia, Philippine, and Vietnam) will share their experience and
lessons on topics that collectively address three key questions in the concept note (the
Concept note as in ANNNEX 1.6).
PROCEEDING
It was also agreed to have another ARKN-FCC meeting back to back with the Forest
Asia Event, from 6-7 May 2013, to discuss emerging issues relating to 2015 UNFCCC
agreement that will be negotiated in conjunction with SBs-40 in Bonn, June 2014, and to
discuss joint submission relating to safeguards information system for REDD+.
2.2.5. Review on the Draft Decision Support Tool for Identifying and
Addressing Drivers of Deforestation and Forest Degradation (DSTDD) in ASEAN Region
Following up the Second Workshop on Identifying and Addressing Drivers of
Deforestation and Forest Degradation in ASEAN+PNG Region, in Jakarta 29 30 August
2013, the Meeting reviewed Draft Decision Support Tools entitled Development of
Decision Support Tool (DST) for Identifying and Addressing Drivers of Deforestation and
Forest Degradation in ASEAN Region. The DST-DD has been developed with support
from USAID-LEAF, expanded from LEAF Programme in five AMS (Cambodia, Lao-PDR,
Malaysia, Thailand, and Vietnam) and Papua New Guinea.
A number of AMS considered that Steps 1-3 of the DST (information gathering phase
that includes an assessment of drivers; prioritizes which drivers are most feasible
to address; and design interventions strategies to address the selected drivers) and
integrating Steps 4-5 (implementation phase; and monitoring phase in which the
success of the selected measures is evaluated allowing for the overall strategy to
be adjusted accordingly) in the implementation of REDD+ National Strategy/Action
Plan. Some other AMS recognized the value of all steps in DST as a standalone tool,
separated from REDD+ National Strategy/Action Plan, to allow country who has not
had National Strategy/Action Plan to exercise with the whole sets of DST procedure.
In order to keep the work progressing, LEAF countires are given opportunity to test
the DST, and to experience gain from the exercises could be discussed in ARKN-FCC
workshop (comments and suggestion to improve draft DST-DD as in ANNEX 1.7).
2.2.6. Review on the Output Documents of the Project on Strengthening

ASEAN Mechanism for Reducing Emissions from Deforestation
and Forest Degradation (REDD-Plus) under ASEAN-Australia
Development Cooperation Programme Phase II (AADCP II) 20122013.
The Meeting was reinformed on the background of the draft document on
Methodological Approaches for REL/RL and MRV Systems and Assessment of Future
capacity and Technology Needs to implement REDD plus effectively. The documents
contain useful information on Methodological Approaches for REL/RL and MRV
PROCEEDING
Systems and other issues. However, due to extensive development and negotiations
of this issue in the climate change conference (COP-UNFCCC) especially relating to
REL/RL and MRV, it was observed that the draft document has been superseded in
substance. The document could be used as a source of reference. AMSs appreciate
the project and AADCP phase II in developing the document on REL/RL and MRV, and
other relevant references.
10
PROCEEDING
III
THE 9TH MEETING OF ASEAN REGIONAL
KNOWLEDGE NETWORK ON FOREST AND
CLIMATE CHANGE
3.1. INTRODUCTION
Following up the 8th meeting of ARKN-FCC in Bali, the ASOF guidance in its 16th
meeting, and as part of the annual work programme, the Office of Coordinator of
ARKN-FCC and ASEAN Secretariat, supported by ASEAN-German Programme on
Response to Climate Change (GAPCC) and the Ministry of Forestry of the Republic of
Indonesia through Forest Carbon Partnership Facility (FCPF), has organized THE 9th
MEETING OF ASEAN REGIONAL KNOWLEDGE NETWORK ON FOREST AND CLIMATE
CHANGE (ARKN-FCC) in Mercure Serpong Alam Sutera Hotel, Indonesia, from 7-8
May 2014. The objectives of the meeting were to discuss relevant issues on : (1) SIS
REDD+ to be included in AMS joint submission of views to the Secretariat of UNFCCC;
(2) Non-Market Based Approaches related to REDD+ Implementation to be included in
AMS joint presentation to be presented in session expert meeting at SBSTA-40; and 3)
National Policy and Programme in forestry and other land sectors by AMS (agenda of
the meeting as in ANNEX 2.1). The meeting was attended by thirty two participants,
representing eight ASEAN Member States (Cambodia, Indonesia, Malaysia, Myanmar,
the Philippines, Singapore, Thailand, and Vietnam), ASEAN Secretariat, and GIZ GAPCC (List of participants as in ANNEX 2.2).
The opening session was started with the remarks by Mr. Dian Sukmajaya, the
Representative of the ASEAN Secretariat, who emphasized that the ARKN-FCC has
produced many documents about ASEAN common position for the UNFCCC process
on REDD+, as well as in strengthening the capacities of ASEAN member states.
The ARKN-FCCs crucial role was also acknowledged by Mr. Thomas Heindriech,
the representative of GIZ GAP-CC. He also expressed continuous support of GIZ to
strengthen ARKN-FCC up to 2017. Dr. Nur Masripatin, the Coordinator of ARKN-FCC
stated in her remarks the importance of ASEAN through ARKN-FCC to prioritizing
PROCEEDING
11
issue on respond to climate change especially in forestry. She also stated that because
of the diversity of AMS forests resources and covers, there are many experiences and
challenges in each AMS. The Meeting was officially opened by Dr. Ida Bagus Putera
Parthama, Acting Director General of Forestry Research and Development Agency,
Ministry of Forestry of the Republic of Indonesia, as the ASOF Leader of Indonesia.
The ASOF Leader of Indonesia appreciated in his opening remarks the success of the
ARKN-FCCs meeting in bringing ASEAN common position into UNFCCC negotiations.
He also reminded the participants to maintain and improve AMS common position,
considering the challenges in UNFCCC negotiations. The ASOF Leader of Indonesia
also welcomed all participants and wished the meeting successful (Remarks of the
Opening Session as in ANNEX 2.3).
3.2. PRESENTATION AND DISCUSSION

3.2.1. Discussion to Prepare Draft ASEAN Joint Submission on REDD+
Discussion to prepare draft ASEAN Joint Submission on REDD+ was facilitated by the
Coordinator of ARKN-FCC and representative of ASEAN Secretariat. The discussion was
guided by several key questions presented by Dr. Nur Masripatin as the Coordinator of
ARKN-FCC.
3.2.2. Issue Relating to Safeguards Information System (SIS)-REDD+

On the issues relating to SIS-REDD+, participants discussed the following three key
questions : (1) How we identify experiences, lessons and challenges from developing
SIS-REDD+?; (2) How we define type of information from SIS?, and (3) Has additional
guidance needed to provide information in SIS-REDD+?
During the presentation, representatives from Indonesia and Malaysia shared lessons
learned and experiences regarding the SIS-REDD+ development. The representatives
from ASEAN Member States (AMS) also shared ideas and views regarding the issues
on discussions session. It was noted that AMS undertaking REDD+ have at different
stages developed REDD+ infrastructure as mandated by Dec. 1/CP. 16 paragraph 71
including system for providing information on how safeguards in Annex 1b of Dec. 1/CP
16 are addressed and respected. Within the different stages of progress in developing
SIS-REDD+, experiences so far showed that AMS started with reviewing their existing
policy and safeguards related instruments in forestry in terms of their relevance
to the Cancun safeguards. It was also agreed that approach, design of the system
including how the system works will be influenced by national circumstances, policy
and capacities. AMS also identified common challenges such as diversity in knowledge,
capacities and capabilities of the actors involved in developing SIS-REDD+, capacities
12
PROCEEDING
in ensuring the continuity in operability of the system (to ensure the sustainability of
SIS is supported), coordinating between stakeholders at national and subnational level,
cost for developing and maintaining the system. AMS recognizes the benefit of sharing
experiences and lessons as countries develop and improve their system. AMS views that
support should be made available in developing and improving the system.
The basic view was that type of Information from SIS-REDD+ that would be helpful and
may be provided by developing country was qualitative information on how safeguards
in Dec. 1/CP. 16 are addresses and respected in REDD+ implementation, which may
include the following information : (1) Description of national REDD+ related policies
and/or programmes and/or activities, (2) Description of initiatives undertaken on how
safeguards are addressed and respected, and (3) Other information that the country
consider necessary.
During the discussion, AMS views that there was no need of additional guidance to
develop SIS-REDD+ because each AMS already has policies and progress in developing
SIS-REDD+ that diverse in each country current forest programmes. AMS views the need
to ensure the transparency, consistency, comprehensive, and effectiveness in developing
SIS-REDD+. Regarding of the design and how the system worked unique in each country
while maintaining their sovereignty. The meeting agreed to continue the discussion on
this issue in the next ARKN-FCC meeting, scheduled between August-September 2014,
taking into account other related meetings. (Records from discussion on Possible Elements
for ASEAN Joint Submission on SIS-REDD+ is as presented in ANNEX 2.4).
3.2.3. Non-Market Based Approaches (NMBA) Related to REDD+

Implementation
The discussion was guided by two key questions as follows : (1) What definitions/
characteristic of Non-Market Based Approach?; and (2) What NMBA examples are
available from AMS?
Discussion on NBMA was ongoing under the issues relating to non-market based
approaches to support the implementation of REDD+ (Decision 1/CP. 16 paragraph 70)
have been reflected in Decision 9/CP.19 on work programme on results-based finance
for REDD+, which recognizes the need to scale up and improve the effectiveness of
finance for REDD+ activities, taking into account Decision 2/CP. 17 paragraph 66
(market-based approaches) and paragraph 67 (non-market based approaches).
On the issues relating to Non-Market Based Approach (NMBA), each AMS identified
definitions, characteristics and examples of NBMA. It was noted that AMS have diverse
approaches to define NMBA. Within the diversity of the approach related to NMBA
PROCEEDING
13
definitions in each AMS, it was concluded that there are similarities of characteristic in the
definition of NMBA from AMS as follows : (1) NMBAs do not generate carbon credit; (2)
Finance and incentives; (3) Sources (private, public, national, international); (3) Channels
(bilateral, multilateral); (4) Use (capacity building, technical support, enabling conditions,
payments for result). AMS also identified their existing fund related forest, REDD+ and
climate change in each country, regional and sub regional.
During the discussion, NMBA examples were taken from each AMS specifically in the
fund and guidance of using the fund. Indonesia provided the examples of FREDDI
(Fund for REDD+ Indonesia), ICCTF (Indonesia Climate Change Trust Fund), and
Reforestation fund. Vietnam provided the example of Vietnam forest fund. Malaysia
provided examples of Conservation Trust Fund, Levy Fund for Sustainable Forest
Management, and Central Spine Projects that contributed towards enhancing forest
spine and reduce forest fragmentation, avoid deforestation, enhanced agricultural
practices, and accounting of emission. Thailand provided example of Payment
for Environmental Services (PES). Cambodia provided example of National forest
program that was supported by the government and partners which funded by
FCPF and UNREDD that were managed by UNDP as the delivery partner. Myanmar
provided examples of national fund in Dry Zone Greening Program and combine
fund with JICA and KOICA for demonstration activities. The Philippines provided
examples of National Greening Program and National Protection Program funded by
national budget that used for reforestation, forestland and protection programmes.
Singapore provided examples of the national budget for reforestation and avoid
deforestation, and also AfoCo (ASEAN-Republic of Korea Forest Cooperation)
projects to manage the fund from Korea Government. Brunei provided examples
of national budget used for Forestry Rehabilitation Program, private fund used
for Timber Improvement that coordinated by the Forestry Department. AMS also
recognized the NMBA examples in sub-regional such as Mekong Fund (Cambodia,
Thailand, Myanmar, Lao PDR and Vietnam) and Heart of Borneo (Indonesia, Malaysia
and Brunei) also regional such as GAP-CC and AfoCo (The presentation of NonMarket Based Approaches Related to REDD+ Implementation: views and examples
is as presented in ANNEX 2.5).
3.2.4. Issue Relating to National Policy and Programme in Forestry and

Other Land Sectors
The objective of this session was to define how AMS individually address the issues
of forestry and other land sector policies, in ASEAN and in international level through
ASEAN. The session provided information on forest and other land sector policies by
AMS.
14
PROCEEDING
3.2.5. Presentation and Discussion on National Policy and Program in

Forestry and Other Land Sectors
1) Malaysia Land Sector (Dr. Elizabeth Phillip)
The forest land was the highest land area in Malaysia amounted to 14.3 million ha from
total land area of 32.97 million ha. Malaysia had land based legislations such as: National
Land Council (NLC), the National Biodiversity Council (NBC) and National Water Resource
Council, National Forestry Act 1984 and others legislations that related to land. Malaysia
also had state laws in each respective state government that support the land based
sector policies. Major source of GHG emissions in Malaysia came from energy (70%) and
waste (13%) and others sector and considered forestry as a net sink. Therefore, mitigation
actions will be prioritized based on the key sources of emission. REDD+ considered as a
NAMA for Malaysia with mitigation action based on national priorities and circumstances
and in all sectors quality (Dr. Elizabeth Philip presentation is presented as in ANNEX 2.6).
2) Forest Policy and Programs in Philippines (Mrs. Mayumi QuintosNatividad)

The Philippines had forest area amounted to 15,8 million ha which covered more than
50% of total land area. Enabling policy for forest management in the Philippines, for
example, all forest lands and natural resources owned by the government (Regalian
doctrine) with access mode by production sharing, joint venture and co-management.
Current forest policies in Philippines related to forest sector were Logging Moratorium in
All Natural Forest Nationwide (Executive Order No. 23) and National Greening Program
(NGP) (Executive Order No. 26). NGP were considered as a NAMA in the Philippines
with missions in food security, poverty reduction, environmental stability, biodiversity
conservation, and climate change mitigation and adaptation. Other priority thrusts in
Philippines were National Forest Protection Program, Forest Resource Assessment,
Forest Land Use Planning, Forest Land Use Planning, Forest Line Boundary Delineation,
Delineation of Production and Protection Forest, and REDD+ Initiatives (Mrs. Mayumi
Quintos-Natividad presentation is presented as in ANNEX 2.7).
3) National Policy on Forestry Planning 2011-2030 (Mr. Radian Bagiyono)

Legal aspects of forest utilization policy consist of: a) Basic Constitution 1945 art. 33;
b) Basis Forestry Act 41-1999 jo Law No. 19 (2004); c) Government Decree 44 (2004)
on Forestry Planning; d) Government Decree 26 (2008) on National Spatial Planning;
e) Ministerial Decree P.24/Menhut-II/2010 on Forest Planning System; and f) Ministerial
Decree P.49/Menhut-II/2011 on National Forestry Planning for years 2001-2030. National
Forestry Planning Years 2011-2030 were rationalized and recalculation of forest areas
PROCEEDING
15
for next 20 years which maintained forest areas at 112,34 million ha after allocated for
non-forestry sector and for addressing tenure conflicts. The main objectives and targets
of forest areas utilization are for: conservation purposes, protecting, natural pristine
forest and peatlands, rehabilitation forest, forest/timber concessionaires, and for nonforestry sector allocation. Policy on optimizing the utilization of forest areas are from
improving system to ensuring access for local communities in managing forest areas
(Mr. Radian Bagiyono presentation is presented as in ANNEX 2.8).
4) National Policy and Program in Forestry and Land Use in Cambodia

(Mr. Thuch Phalla)
Land use areas in Cambodia consist of: forest cover (10.4 million ha), rice field (3.05
million ha), other crops (0.94 million ha), permanent crops (0.18 million ha), and rubber
plantation (0.32 million ha). Protected forests and protected areas were also included in
Cambodia forest planning with amounted to 20% from total country area. Cambodia
had national policies, enabling legislation, and strategies consist of: law on forestry,
fisheries, protected areas; royal degree, sub-decree and ministerial declaration; and
National Forestry Program 2010-2029. Regarding land sector, Cambodia considered
land as important issue which had laws on land to allocate issue of land tenure, land
certification and the rights of lands (Mr. Thuch Phalla presentation is presented as in
ANNEX 2.9).
5) National Policy on Forest, Land Natural Resources and Environment in

Thailand (Dr. Suchitra Changtragoon)
Thailand had 17 million ha of forest areas. In Forest land use policy, National Preserved
Areas amounted to 23.6 million ha were classified into 3 zones as the C-zone
(Conservation forest), the E-zone (Economic forest), and the A-zone (Agricultural uses).
Legal framework for forest management and conservation were from Forest Act (1941)
to Decentralization Act (1998). Three forest related departments were Royal Forest
Department (RFD), Department of National Parks, Wildlife and Plan Conservation
(DNP), and Department of Marine and Coastal Resources (DMCR). Flagship projects
in Thailand were the following : 1) improve the protection forest in line with national
policy (King Projects); 2) speed up on forest zoning; 3) forest protection by using
holistic approach; 4) forest management by using participation approach; 5) improve
capability on Ecotourism in income in national parks development; 6) Readiness on
mitigation and adaptation to climate change and national disaster (include Readiness
on REDD+); and 7) knowledge management on forest and wildlife management.
REDD+ considered as a NAMA in Thailand (Dr. Suchitra Changtragoon presentation is
presented as in ANNEX 2.10).
16
PROCEEDING
6) Issues Relating to Land Sector and Forest in Myanmar (Dr. Myat Su

Mon)
Land use area in Myanmar consisted of: forest cover (67% from total land area),
agriculture (20.3% from total land area), and others. There were total of 74 policies/
laws and legislation related to forestry and other land sectors. Existing social and
environmental PLRs, procedures guidelines in Myanmar consisted of Myanmar Forest
Policy (1995) to National Code of Practices for Forest Harvesting (2000). Issues relating
to land sector and forest in Myanmar, for example, land was seen as potential resource
in development of the country and poverty alleviation, and so, the Government assigned
Lands Use Allocation and Utilization Scrutinizing Committee (LUAUSC). Pilot land use
assessment in Myanmar were carried out in 3 stages of working process which were:
1) prepare baseline data on LULC to direct planning at district level, use of data in pilot
demonstration, and public consultation; 2) proceeding from a land use map to a land
management plan for a pilot procedure; and 3) public consultation which currently on
going progress in Myanmar.
During the discussion, regarding policies in combating illegal logging, Indonesia had
set a movement to eradicate illegal logging as stated in Presidential Instruction No.
4/2005, Thailand and Cambodia had a moratorium of illegal logging, while other AMS
considered this policies were included in the existing forest policies. AMS considered
land sector as an important issues that has been addressed in each national forest and
environment planning, and has important roles in mitigation and adaptation of climate
change. AMS also considered the diversity of laws related to forestry and other land use
sector in each country due to budgeting, the long-process and technical constraint, and
the conflict between government policy and the need of the people.
3.3. OTHER ISSUE /WORK PROGRAMME OF ARKN- FCC 2014

Discussion on ARKN-FCC work programme 2014 was facilitated by Dr. Nur Masripatin
as the coordinator of ARKN-FCC. In the 9th ARKN-FCC meeting, AMS agreed to hold
further meeting in the second week of August 2014, taking into account related
agenda/meetings. The ARKN-FCC agreed to identify important issues and activities for
ARKN-FCC in the next three years also to synergize the activities with the institutions
under GAP-CC. ARKN-FCC was invited to participate in a meeting with representative
of Ministry of Germany International Program that related to the support from
Government of Germany to ASEAN in climate change sector, particularly Forest and
Climate Change.
PROCEEDING
17
IV
CLOSING
The ARKN-FCC Work Programme for 2013 2015 encompass three main areas : policy,
capacity and communication. Until August 2014, there are 4 (four) activities have been
conducted to achieve target mentioned/included in that Work Programme. The two
ARKN-FCC Meetings in March and May were conducted to address the area of both
Policy and Communication. For the further time frame, ARKN-FCC is committed to
continue its activities in many possible forms and in collaboration with any possible
partners. All activities by ARKN-FCC will be staying in the ASEAN spirit of One Vision,
One Identity, One Community, attempted to work together within the network,
strengthen each other and share lessons learned on forest and climate change among
the countries. These commitments and roles of ARKN-FCC will also include being
balancing block in the global REDD+ negotiation in UNFCCC, to help balancing the
left-wing and right-wing groups.
PROCEEDING
19
ANNEX
PROCEEDING
21
ANNEX 2.1
THE 8th MEETING OF ASEAN REGIONAL KNOWLEDGE NETWORK
ON FOREST AND CLIMATE CHANGE (ARKN-FCC)
Pan Pacific Nirwana Bali Resort, Bali - INDONESIA
4-6 March 2014
AGENDA
MONDAY, 3 MARCH 2014
Start 13.00
Check-in
Day 1 - TUESDAY, 4 MARCH 2014

08.00 - 09.00
Registration
OC
09.00 - 10.00
Opening Session
Remarks by ASEAN Secretariat representative
Remarks by GAP-CC representative
Remarks by Coordinator of ARKN-FCC
Opening remarks by the ASOF Leader of Indonesia
MC
10.00 - 10.30
Coffee break
10.30 - 10.40
Adoption of the meeting agenda
10.40 - 12.30
Discussion to prepare draft joint submission

(closed meeting)
12.30 - 13.30
Lunch break
13.30 - 17.00

(closed meeting)
Coordinator of ARKN-FCC
and ASEC Representative
Day 2 - WEDNESDAY, 5 MARCH 2014

Morning session :
08.30 - 10.30

(closed meeting)
10.30 - 10.45
Coffee break
10.45 - 12.30
ARKN-FCC Work Programme 2013-2015

(evaluation of progress/achievement, relevant emerging issues, and
priorities for 2014)
12.30 - 13.30
Lunch break
13.30 - 17.00
Afternoon session :
1. Discussion on the review of DST Draft Development of decision
support tool (DST) for identifying and addressing drivers of
deforestation and forest degradation in ASEAN region,
2. Discussion on the review of output documents of the Project on

Strengthening ASEAN Mechanism for Reducing Emissions from
Deforestation and Forest Degradation (REDD-Plus) under ASEANAustralia Development Cooperation Programme Phase II (AADCP
II) 2012-2013
Coffee break
3. Other issues
4. Closing
Day 3 - TUESDAY, 4 MARCH 2014
FIELD TRIP
06.30 17.00
22
Field visit West Bali National Park
LAMPIRAN
ANNEX 2.2
LIST OF PARTICIPANTS
THE 8 MEETING OF ASEAN REGIONAL KNOWLEDGE NETWORK
th
BALI INDONESIA, 4-6 MARCH 2014

Mailing
Address &
Phone Number
No
Country
No
Name
CAMBODIA
Mr. Thuch Phalla
Deputy Chief,
Office of Habitats
and Nature Based
Eco-tourism
Management,
Department
of Wildlife and
Biodiversity,
CAMBODIA
Mailing address is
not available
(855-12509995)
thuchphallafa@gmail.
com
Mr. Yek Sokla
Technical Officer,
Department of
Legislation and
Enforcement,
CAMBODIA
Mailing address is
not available
855-78574040
forestrysokla@gmail.
com
Dr.Ir. Nur
Masripatin,
M.For.Sc.
Director of
the Centre for
Standardization
and Environment
Ministry of
Forestry,
INDONESIA/ARKNFCC Coordinator/
REDD+
Negotiator
Block VII 8th floor

Jl. Gatot Subroto
Senayan- Jakarta
10270
INDONESIA
Tel /Fax + 62 21
5733433
nurmasripatin@ymail.
com
Dr. Ir. I
Wayan Susi
Dharmawan,
M.Sc.
Researcher,
Centre for
Conservation and
Rehabilitation
Researh and
Development
Ministry of
Forestry,
INDONESIA
Campus of
FORDA, Jl.
Gunung Batu
Bogor, West Java
Indonesia
Mobile :
+628151429522
salifa03@yahoo.co.id
Novia
Widyaningtyas,
S.Hut.M.Sc.
Head of Climate
Change Division,
Centre for
Standardization
and Environment
Ministry of
Forestry,
INDONESIA
Block VII 8th floor

Jl. Gatot Subroto
Senayan- Jakarta
10270
INDONESIA
Tel /Fax + 62 21
5733433
Ph ;
+628151429522
noviawidyaningtyas@
yahoo.com
Dian Nugraha,
S.Hut., MM.
Centre for
International
Cooperation,
Ministry of Forestry,
INDONESIA
Block VII 4h floor

Jl. Gatot Subroto
Senayan- Jakarta
10270
INDONESIA
dian.nugraha@gmail.
com
2.
INDONESIA
Institution
E-mail
widyaningtyasnovia@
gmail.com
PROCEEDING
23
No
3.
4.
Country
LAO PDR
MALAYSIA
No
Name
Institution
Mailing
Address &
Phone Number
E-mail
Kinnalone
Phommasack,
PhD
Deputy Director
REDD+ Office
Division,
Department of
Forestry, Ministry
of Agriculture and
Forestry,
LAO PDR/
REDD+ Task
Force
Thaddam Road,
Chantabuli
District, Vientiane
Capital - Lao
PDR, P.O. Box
2933
kinnalone.ph@gmail.
com
Mr. Phayvanh
Alounsavath
Technical Officer,
REDD+ Office,
Department of
Forestry, LAO PDR
Mailing address is
not available
Ph : +856 20
28883137
v_vanh2am@hotmail.
com
Dr. Elizabeth
Philip
Head of REDD
Unit, Ministry of
Natural Resources
and Environment,
MALAYSIA /
REDD+ Negotiator
6th Level,
Wisma Sumber
Asli, Persiaran
Perdana, Precinct
4, 62574
Putrajaya
philip@nre.gov.my
Tel : +603 8886

1074
Fax : +603 8888
4473
2
5.
MYANMAR
24
LAMPIRAN
Mrs. Nuraizah
Binti Mohd Zam
Dr. Myat Su
Mon
Mr. Sein Htoon

Linn
Principal Assistant
Secretary, Ministry
of Natural
Resources and
Environment ,
MALAYSIA
Level 12, Wisma

Sumber Asli No.
25, Persiaran
Perdana, Precinct
4, Putrajaya
Assistant Director,
RS and GIS
Section, Planning
and Statistics
Division, Forest
Department,
MYANMAR
Building No.
39, Forest
Department Head
Quarter, Nay Pyi
Taw, Myanmar
Direcor,
Planning
and Statistics
Department,
Ministry of
Environmental
Conservation and
Forestry, Nay Pyi
Taw, MYANMAR
Building No.
28, Ministers
Office, Ministry
of Environmental
Conservation and
Forestry, Nay Pyi
Taw, MYANMAR
nuraizah@govuc.
gov.my
Tel : +603 8886

1073
Fax : +603 8888
4504
sumonforest@gmail.
com
Tel : +95-067405109
Fax : +95-067405016
Tel : +95-067405384
Fax : +95-067405012
linn.seinhtoon@gmail.
com
No
Country
No
PHILIPPINES
Name
Alaya de Leon,
LL.M.
Mailing
Address &
Phone Number
Institution
REDD+
Negotiator/
Senior Legal
Specialist,
Ateneo School of
Government,
PHILIPPINES
Pacifico Ortiz
Hall, Social
Development
Complex, Ateneo
de Manila
University, Loyola
Hts., Quezon
City 1108,
PHILIPPINES
E-mail
ayadeleon@gmail.
com
Ph. : +63 2
426 6001 loc.
4649, Fax. +63
4 426 5997,
+639178471282
6.
7.
SINGAPORE
THAILAND
8.
VIETNAM
Mr. Hassan
Ibrahim
Dr. Suchitra
Changtragoon
Ms. Prattana
Meesincharoen
Dr. Pham Quoc

Hung
REDD+
Negotiator/
Deputy Director
(Terrestrial),
National
Biodiversity
Centre, National
Parks Board,
SINGAPORE
Singapore
Botanic Gardens,
1 Cluny Road,
SINGAPORE
259569
ARKN-FCC Focal
Point and REDD+
Negotiator/
Expert on Forest
Conservation
Research
Expert Office
Forest and Plant
Conservation
Research Office
Department of
National Park,
Wildlife and Plant
Conservation
61 Phaholyothin,
Chatuchak,
Bangkok,
Thailand 10900
International
Forestry
Cooperation
Office,
Royal Forest
Departement,
Thailand
Mailing address is
not available
REDD+ negotiator,
ARKN-FCC
national focal
point/
Vietnam
Administration of
Forestry,
VIETNAM
Room 407, B9
building, No.2
Ngoc Ha street,
Hanoi, Vietnam
hassan_ibrahim@
nparks.gov.sg
Ph. : +65
64651687,
+6581981903
Fax. : +65
64654930
suchitra.
changtragoon@gmail.
com
Tel: 662 5610777

ext. 1440, 1441
Fax: 662
5610777 ext.
1441
prattana71@gmail.
com
Ph : +62 2
5614292-3 ext
5034,
+66
086 0763738
phamquochung72@
gmail.com
Ph :
+84968591236
PROCEEDING
25
No
9.
10.
Country
ASEAN
Secretariat
GAP-CC
No
2
Dr. Nat. Techn.

Nguyen Phu
Hung
Mr. Dian
Sukmajaya
26
LAMPIRAN
Name
Mr. Roman
Roehrl
Dr. Agus
Suratno
Institution
Mailing
Address &
Phone Number
E-mail
No 2 Ngoc HaBa Dinh Ha Noi,

Vietnam
Tel : +84
912094190
Fax : +84 4 3
8438793
hungfipi@vnn.vn
70A, Jalan
Sisingamangaraja, Jakarta,
Indonesia
Tel : +62 21 726
2991 Ext 484
Fax : +62 21 739
8234/724 3504
dian.sukmajaya@
asean.org
Advisor,
ASEAN-German
Programme on
Response to
Climate Change
(GAP-CC)
Deutsche
Gesellschaft fr
Internationale
Zusammenarbeit
(GIZ) GmbH
Menara BCA,
46th Floor
Jl. M.H. Thamrin
No.1
Jakarta 10310,
Indonesia
roman.roehrl@giz.de
Advisor,
ASEAN-German
Programme on
Response to
Climate Change
(GAP-CC)
Deutsche
Gesellschaft fr
Internationale
Zusammenarbeit
(GIZ) GmbH
Menara BCA,
46th Floor
Jl. M.H. Thamrin
No.1
Jakarta 10310,
Indonesia
T + 62 21 2358
7111
F + 62 21 2358
7110
M + 62 813
187171 96
Director,
Department
of Sciences
Technology and
International
Cooperation
of Forestry
Administration
of Vietnam
(VNFOREST),
VIETNAM
Senior Officer,
ASEAN Secretariat
T + 62 21 2358
7111 Ext. 236
F + 62 21 2358
7110
M + 62 811 8005
249
agus.suratno@giz.de
ANNEX 2.3
a. OPENING REMARKS BY ASEAN SECRETARIAT REPRESENTATIVE
Distinguished ASOF Leader Indonesia,
Coordinator of ARKN FCC and representative of GAP CC,
Distingushed delegates, ladies and gentlemen,
Very good morning, selamat pagi, assalamualaikum Wr. Wb
First of all let me take this opportunity on behalf of ASEAN Secretariat and aims to highly
appreciate host country for organizing the 8th ARKN-FCC meeting in beautiful island,
Bali. I would like to also extend highest appreciation to Dr. Nur Masripatin who has been
consistent and put extra effort to maintain the mandate given by the ASEAN to provide
knowledge and recommendation for ASOF leaders in relation with the issue on forest
and climate change in particular on REDD+. My appreciation is also goes to GAP CC
GIZ who has provided us with generous and continuous support for the network. In this
good occasion I honestly very happy and exciting to be part again as a network member.
Therefore i d like to congratulate to all members for some significant achievementhave
been made thus far.
Ladies and gentlemen,
I can still recall few years back in 2008 when we had an inauguration for ARKN-FCC
following the recommendation from 11th ASOF to establish the network. At that time
the network has produced promising output in term of dialogue on REDD in ASEAN.
The questions at this stage dialogue was why REDD? What is it? Is the mechanism better
than AR CDM? I am happy to note that Nowadays the dialogue is still continuing and
even better. I learnt there is growing concern that ASEAN could become an important
negotiation block at the UNFCCC process in particular on REDD+. I believe that without
common concern and sharing through regional dialogue this may not be happened.
I believe all AMS do hope in the upcoming years the network can still exist to enhance
sharing knowledge and experience and to discuss how ASEAN could benefit from REDD+.
To maintain continuity and good cooperation, active participation from all network
members is important. I hope this meeting will befruitful and much productive. And
again I thank to ASOF Leader of Indonesia, Coordinator of ARKN-FCC, GAPCC, and all
the networks member for their commitment to ASEAN. Thank you very much.
Dian Sukmajaya
Senior Officer
Agriculture Industries & Natural Resources Division
Finance, Industry & Infrastructure Directorate
ASEAN Economic Community (AEC) Department
ASEAN Secretariat
PROCEEDING
27
b. OPENING REMARKS BY GAP CC RERESENTATIVE

Dear ASOF Leader, Chair, ARKN-FCC secretariat and members and other guests
We are very happy to be your longstanding partner in UNFCCC. Congratulations for
your achievement in COP19 Warsaw. That was an important step for UNFCCC and
ASEAN Agenda. I wish to support you in coming future. This network seems like a small
step, but it is really significant. We will certainly do our best to support you, though
sometimes it could be tricky since GIZ is a global development program that sometimes
dealing with small projects. We are very open for your suggestion to further and better
support ASEAN. This small group can have significant influences in the right moment.
We will put our support to you. National framework on REDD+ and financing are issues
to be addressed in the future. This challenge will be GIZ to observe in order to better
the support. GIZ does not role to dictate you, but we would like to hear from you and
use it to increase our support.
Roman Roehrl
Advisor, ASEAN-German Programme on Response to Climate Change (GAP-CC)
Deutsche Gesellschaft fr
Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH
c. OPENING REMARKS BY ARKN-FCC Coordinator
Representative of ASEAN Secretariat, Mr. Dian Sukmajaya,
Representative of GERMAN-ASEAN Programme on Response to Climate Change (GAP-CC),
Mr. Roman Roehrl,
Representatives of ASEAN Member States, ARKN-FCC members,
Representative from University Warmadewa, Dr. I Gusti Bagus Udayana,
Representative of Ministry of Forestry in Bali,
Good Morning. I am happy to see you again. I hope you have time to go around seeing
the beauty of Bali. It is a good day, because almost all of us attend, but Brunei cannot
join with us. Thanks to Bapak Dian Sukmajaya for reminding us to the history of the
development of this network. We never forget your contribution to ARKN-FCC.
Colleague,
We have 2 (two) days meeting, the 1st day will be closed and the 2nd will be open
meeting and we expect GIZ representative will join the 2nd day meeting to discuss the
ARKN-FCC work programme. We respect GIZs support and roles without interfering
our views or positions. GIZ has been the main partner from the beginning of ARKN-FCC
establishment.
28
LAMPIRAN
Colleague,
As we know, we have very tight schedule to finish including preparing join submission.
The submission is the mandate from ASOF from the 16th meeting in Brunei last year.
We will enter the ASEAN economic community in 2015 and latest UNFCCC agreement
for one platform for all. Our sector will be the one of the most important sector. There will
be several issues that affect the process in ASEAN, thus the meeting tomorrow will discuss
the 2015 agreement which will be taking place in Paris and its impact for the network and
what should be anticipated in the Work Programme.
Colleague,
We would like to thank Bapak Putera as the current ASOF Leader. We already had support
from the former ASOF Leader, Bapak Wahjudi Wardojo, Bapak Tachrir Fathoni and Bapak
Iman Santoso. I am sure we will have even more support from Bapak Putera.
Colleague,
Despite the diverse circumstances of our 10 Asian Members States, our forest community
has common position in UNFCCC. It is the friendly environment that we have to maintain.
We need to work together so we can keep the same spirit to strengthen our position in
negotiation. I never thought that what we did in Warsawa has very big impact. So thanks
to the network members for our collective works and achievements so far. We have
worked together in some areas that we have the same views and avoiding areas that has
no convergence views. That is the beautiy of this network. Welcome again to Bali, I hope
we have a productive meeting. Thank you
Dr. Nur Masripatin
ARKN-FCC Coordinator
d. OPENING REMARKS BY ASOF LEADER OF INDONESIA
Representative of GERMAN-ASEAN Programme on Response to Climate Change (GAP-CC),
Mr. Roman Roehrl,
Coordinator of ASEAN Knowledge Network on Forest and Climate Change, Dr. Nur Masripatin
Representatives of MoF Technical Units,
Representative of Warmadewa University, Dr. I Gusti Bagus Udayana
Distinguished guests, ladies and gentlemen
It is truly a great honor for me, on behalf of the Government of Indonesia to address
all of you at this very important event, and to formally welcome you all.Being
a Balinese, I am especially proud to welcome you to this globally acclaimed site of
PROCEEDING
29
tourist, the Tanah Lot. Although I know, you are here not as tourists, but to negotiate.
At this opportunity I also would like to convey our particular appreciation to GIZ for
the support provided enabling ARKN-FCC to keep rolling. A special appreciation also
goes to Dr. Nur Masripatin for the excellent coordinating work that has been done, and
to ASEC for the continuous support given. When bu Nur asked for support from ASOF
Leader, I can say the answer is a big YES?
Distinguished participants, Ladies and Gentlemen,
ARKN-FCC meetings are always of particular importance.First, because ARKN-FCCis
an important subsidiary body under ASOF for dealing with CC issues in forestry. The
establishment of ARKN-FCC was politically supported by ASOF leaders of all AMS,
and fully supported by ASEAN Secretary General as well. As mentioned earlier by our
ARKN-FCC Coordinator, ASEC was very instrumental in the establishment of ARKNFCC.
Secondly, it is important because ARKN-FCC has become the platform for AMS to
communicate, to consolidate internally, in order to strengthen the regions existence in
the international constellation of CC negotiation. We must be glad with the fact that,
although ASEAN has not beenregistered as a negotiating block, but the existence as
a regional group has been recognized. This recognition is because ASEAN has been
able to submit joint submissions or common positions in severalCOPs. We have to
appreciate that ARKN-FCC has conducted it is task properly so AMS could successfully
prepare ASEANscommon positions on REDD+in COP 14, COP 18 and COP 19. ARKN
definitely has been functioning as a hub for communicating AMS common position in
UNFCCC negotiation. I agree with Mr. Roman Roehrl in sayingthat the achievementin
Warsaw was very exemplary given the complex situation of the negotiation and the fact
that ASEAN is only consisted of 10 countries.
Ladies and Gentlemen,
But this 8th meeting of ARKN-FCC is especially important because it is a year before
2015, when UNFCCC will become legally binding. As a recognizedregional group,
ASEAN needs to play a more significant role in the shaping of the 2015 UNFCC legally
binding agreement. The negotiation under UNFCCC in 2015 and beyond will give
more emphasize to several sectors of economy, including forestry and land sector. As a
consequence, ASEAN countries with all their potency in forestry and land sector will be
a target for global economic and political interest.
In order to respond to those situations, AMS both individually and collectively need to
prepare a good strategy to anticipate year 2015 and beyond, not only in the UNFCCC
negotiation process but also in the implementation at the national and local levels.
I strongly believe, ASEAN, a region where nearly one-third of the worlds tropical rain
forest is located, but at the same time also as one of the most vibrant regions in terms of
30
LAMPIRAN
economic development, will be able to play a significant role in the global negotiation, as
long as AMS enter the game as a solidly unified group.
And that is among what we can expect from this 8th meeting of ARKN-FCC. Recalling
to the ASOF-16 Guidance, ARKN-FCC is tasked to prepare the common position for
the upcoming negotiation. In addition, as we all know, based on COP 19 decision on
the issuesrelating to REDD+, parties are invitedto submit their views to the UNFCCC
Secretariat concerning methodological guidance on non-carbon benefits of REDD+, and
non-market based approach for joint adaptation and mitigation (JAM).
In this 8th meeting of ARKN-FCC, I believe all participants would share their best
knowledge, expertise and experience in order to obtain an agreed draft submission to be
forwarded to ASOF Leaders and National Focal Points through ASEAN Secretariat.
I also consider, it is also timely to review the ARKN-FCC work programs for 2013-2015,
not only to see the progress, but also to consider whether some adjustment is necessary.
Before I end this remark, I would like to share what I contemplated last night before went
to sleep.
When we talk about ASEAN, we actually talk about a group of 10 countries in a region
that share many common characteristics, but also at the same time widely divers in many
aspects. Both our similarities and diversities sometimes become hurdles to be a solid
group. We may argue on the ownership of a certain culture thatwe share. We may
dispute on something that our countries have different points of view.
In looking back, it is some how quite encouraging that in term of climate change we have
been able to have a common position. In a sense, it is the existence of climate change
threat that leads us to consolidate. Perhaps, because when talking about climate change,
none of us will have a better destiny than the others. We are all equally fragile. So it is
unlike when we talk about trade, for example, when one may gain more than the other,
in the issue of climate change we all be the losers if we are not united.
In retrospect, this year of 2014 is also very important for ASEAN because it is only one
year before weenter AEC 2015, as one of the pillars toward ASEAN single community.
We have progressed toward that goal. But there are differences remain. To an extend, it
is not too much to say, that if on climate change issue, which is abstract to some extend,
we can come up with a common position, then why not on the other issues. Therefore,
the progress achieved in climate change through ARKN-FCC actually contributes to the
realization of ASEAN community.
Distinguished participants, Ladies and Gentlemen,
Now I would really end my remark by wishing you all a productive and fruitful meeting in
the next two days, to come with a great output that will solidify our region in the global
PROCEEDING
31
stage of climate change negotiation. I also strongly suggest you to balance your hard
work with the fun side of life. As a said before, this site of Tanah Lot is a famous place for
watching sunset. The picturesque view has been a trade mark of Bali. So please make
some time to enjoy it. I also congratulate you for the opportunity to have a field trip to
West Bali National Park. Please enjoy it to the maximum level, build your own sweet
memories of this place.
Now, following the request from Dr. Nur Masripatin, by expressing the highest praise
to God Almighty for His grace and mercy that enable us to be here for this opening
ceremony, I hereby declare the 8th Meeting of ASEAN Regional Knowledge Network on
Forest and Climate Change, is formally opened.
Thank you very much.
I.B. Putera Parthama, PhD
Director General of FORDA, ASOF Leader of Indonesia,
32
LAMPIRAN
ANNEX 2.4
SUBMISSION BY
Brunei Darussalam, Cambodia, Indonesia, Lao PDR, Malaysia, Myanmar,
Philippines, Singapore, Thailand, and Vietnam
as members of the Association of South East Asian Nations (ASEAN)
on
Methodological guidance for activities relating to reducing emissions from deforestation
and forest degradation and the role of conservation, sustainable management of forests
and enhancement of forest carbon stocks (REDD+) in developing countries
Subsidiary Body on Scientific and Methodological Advise (SBSTA) in its thirty-eight session
invited Parties to submit to the Secretariat, by 26 March 2014, their views on methodological
guidance for non-market-based approaches (paragraph 16) and on the issues related to noncarbon benefits (paragraph 24) of the Document FCCC/SBSTA/2013/L.12 .
The joint submission by Brunei Darussalam, Cambodia, Indonesia, Lao PDR, Malaysia,
Myanmar, Philippines, Singapore, Thailand, and Vietnam, as the members of the Association of
South East Asian Nations (ASEAN), address the issues under Paragraphs 16 and 24 as follows:
I. Paragraph 16 (Non-market based approaches)

ASEAN member states (AMS) recognize that discussion on issues relating to nonmarket based approaches to enhance mitigation actions including REDD+ are
ongoing under the SBSTA agenda on market and non-market mechanisms under the
Convention. Furthermore, issues relating to non-market based approaches to support
the implementation of REDD+ (decision 1/CP. 16 paragraph 70) have been reflected
in decision 9./CP.19 on work programme on results-based finance for REDD+,
which recognizes the need to scale up and improve the effectiveness of finance for
REDD+ activities, taking into account decision 2/CP. 17 paragraph 66 (market-based
approaches) and paragraph 67 (non-market based approaches),
The COP-19 decision has provided sufficient methodological guidance which countries
can begin to apply to non-market based approaches in REDD+ implementation and
draw lessons from the experiences. In this regards, AMS are of the views that it is
too premature at this stage to further discuss methodological guidance for non-market
based approaches,
In relation to joint mitigation and adaptation (JMA) approaches for integral and
sustainable management of forests as referred to decision 2/CP.17, AMS view that JMA
PROCEEDING
33
can be understood conceptually but is methodologically and operationally complex.

And so, there is a need for clarity on the applicability of JMA at the international
setting. AMS suggest that the in session expert meeting at SBSTA-40 should focus on
clarifying the methodological issues related to JMA.
II. Paragraph 24 (Non-carbon Benefits/NCBs)

The importance of non-carbon benefits (NCBs) in the implementation of REDD+ has

been widely recognized. However, NCBs vary significantly from country to country,
and so, NCBs should be nationally defined,
AMS view that each country, according to national circumstance, legislation and
capacity :
could, as an option, select types of NCBs from a broad range of ecosystem

functions and services, to be considered in the REDD+ implementation,
could use existing
assessing NCBs,
methodology or develop appropriate methodology for
should enhance research cooperation to support the development of methodology

for assessing NCBs,
should share knowledge and experiences with other countries, considering that a
number of NCBs is specific to sub-national or local circumstances.

It is important to note that NCBs should not outweigh carbon benefits which is needed
to achieve the objectives of mitigation actions through REDD+,
Results from NCBs assessment should not be used to penalize REDD+ activities, but
rather to provide incentives for more performance in REDD+ implementation. This
is in line with decision 9/CP.19 on work programme on results-based finance for
REDD+, which recognizes the importance of incentivizing non-carbon benefits for the
long-term sustainability of REDD+ implementation.
It is important to note that support, including capacity building, for assessing NCBs is
necessary for developing countries to deliver NCBs in REDD+ implementation.
34
LAMPIRAN
ANNEX 2.5
3. Policy Dialogue on Forest and

Land Sector under climate
regime
4. Develop ASEAN common
position for UNFCCC related
processes, including
strengthening capacity of AMS
negotiators
2. Explore and Analyze Financial

options for REDD+/mitigation in
forestry
1. Develop decision making tool

Drivers of dedorestation and
forest degradation, risk
assessment, cost benefit
analysis of REDD+
ACTIVITIES
2013
Q2
Training
Indonesi
a
(Mar)
WS-I
Thailand
(9-10
April)
Q1
Germany
(August)
WS-II
Indonesia
(30-31
October)
Q3
Q4
Indon
esia
(4-6
Mar)
Q1
Lao-PDR
(tbc)
Indonesi
a (7-8
May)
Indonesi
a (7-8
May)
2014
Q2
Q3
Q4
Q1
2015
Q2
Q3
ASEAN REGIONAL KNOWLEDGE NETWORK ON FOREST AND CLIMATE CHANGE (ARKN-FCC)

WORK PROGRAMME 2013 2015 AND STATUS OF ITS IMPLEMENTATION
(March 2014)
MAIN AREAS
POLICY
CAPACITY
1. Measurement and Monitoring :

nesting/up scaling
REL/RL/Future scenarios
building for REL
2. Carbon accounting and LULUCF
Q4
35
PROCEEDING
36
LAMPIRAN
4. Web portal on lesson learnt

5. Other emerging issues:
Land sector on ADP
3. Information system on
safeguards
3. Policy Exchanges on Carbon

market (lessons from NZAustralia)
4. Workshop to address REDD+
safeguards and development of
safeguards information system
5. Capacity building workshop(s)
on lessons from REDD+ pilot
sites
1. Database allometric
equations and emission factors
2. Networking and regional
meetings (incl. to develop
ASEAN common position)
ACTIVITIES
2013
Q2
Q3
Q4
ARKN-FCC Secretariat
AMS, supported by GAPCC and GoI
ASEC & ARKN-FCC Secretariat (note

: with information from AMS),
supported by GAPCC
LEAF (confirmed support)
Q1
Indonesi
a (7-8
May)
2014
Q2
AMS
Indon
esia
(4-6
Indonesi
March a (7-8
)
May)
Indonesi
a (7-8
May)
26 Jan
-7 Feb
Q1
Q3
Q4
Q1
(2) Activities with blank time-schedule will be carried out according to the priority of AMS (taking into account progress in UNFCCC
negotiation and other relevant forums, and activities in AMS), subject to the availability of resources.
Notes : (1) All activities (individual AMS and collective activites), wherever possible, be shared under COMMUNICatION,
COMMUNICA
TION
MAIN AREAS
2015
Q2
Q3
Q4
ANNEX 2.6
APPLICATION FORM - TECHNICAL AND NETWORKING SESSION
(Please read the guidelines provided on the website in filling out
this application form)
Focal Point: Dr. Nur Masripatin

Organization(s): Centre for Standardization and Environment, Ministry of Forestry,
Indonesia/Office of the Coordinator of ASEAN Regional Knowledge Network on
Forest and Climate Change (ARKN-FCC)
Contact details: (address, phone, fax, email, website)
Ministry of Forestry, Manggala Wanabakti Building, Block VII, 8th floor,
Jl. Gatot Subroto, Senayan, Jakarta 10270. Ph/Fax. 021-5733433; 5720190.
Email : nurmasripatin@gmail.com ; nurmasripatin@ymail.com.
Website : www.staneclime.org
Partner/Sponsor : GIZ
Contact details : Mr. Roman Roehrl
ASEAN-German Programme on Response to Climate Change (GAPCC)
Deutsche Gesellschaft fr Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH
Menara BCA, 46th Floor
Jl. M.H. Thamrin No.1
Jakarta 10310, Indonesia
T + 62 21 2358 7111
F + 62 21 2358 7110
E roman.roehrl@giz.de
I www.giz.de www.gapcc.org
Title of Technical and Networking Session:
3. Climate change and biodiversity
REDD+ POLICY DEVELOPMENT AND IMPLEMENTATION : lessons from
ASEAN
Targeted number of participants:
50 - 120 pax
Summary of Session: (maximum of 150 words, including a brief note on
how the session will connect the specific topic to a landscapes approach)
South East Asian Region own approximately 283.2 million ha of forests or 33.4 %
of the region area. The region represents diversity in terms of forest area and forest
resources management histories, economic and political conditions. Nevertheless,
PROCEEDING
37
the region shares in common in terms of cultural values, biodiversity richness,

dependency of local people on forest resources in many countries, and vulnerabilty
to climate changes.
Through the work of ARKN-FCC, ASEAN member states has successfully developed a
number of common positions on REDD+ in the UNFCCC negotiations, strengthened
capacities through training workshops, sharing information and experiences, and
joint initiatives relating to REDD+. AMS have also been blessed with their different
involvement in bilateral, regional, and multilateral programmes, for example, UNREDD
(e.g. Cambodia, Indonesia, Vietnam), FCPF (e.g. Cambodia, Indonesia, Thailand) ,
FIP (Indonesia, Lao PDR), LEAF USAID (Cambodia, Lao-PDR, Malysia, Thailand, and
Vietnam; and LEAF USAID with ARKN-FCC), as well as bilateral ASEAN with developed
countries such as with Germany under GAP-CC.
REDD+ by concept is a landscape-based approach, a national level undertaking which
can be implemented at sub-national level. The technical session will present the ASEAN
experiences in policy development at the international and regional levels, and the
progress on policy and technical/methodological developments and implementations
at the national and sub-national levels, including demonstration activities.
Three key sector- or issue-specific questions the panel will address:
1. How do ASEAN member states use regional platform to streghthen their roles at
the international REDD+ negotiations and to support their national REDD+ policy
development and implementation ?
2. How does individual ASEAN member state approaches REDD+, according to
their national circumstances and national development objectives ? and how they
progress ?
3. What lessons or experiences could be learned from ASEAN member states in
developing REDD+ infrastructure (e.g. REL/RL, NFMS and/or MRV, safeguards
and SIS, addressing drivers of deforestation and forest degradation, and other
relevant interventions) ?.
Host, Speakers and Moderators: (we assume the speaker list may change, our
objective is to see the types of speakers that the hosts envision for the session; if and
how many speakers are invited depends on the planned session format)
Host : Dr. Nur Masripatin and Mr. Roman Roehrl
Moderator : Mr. Wahjudi Wardojo (The Nature Conservancy)
1. Speaker and Title 1: ARKN-FCC Coordinator (Dr. Nur Masripatin : Addressing
International, Regional and National Issues of REDD+ : approaches and lessons
learned from ARKN-FCC)
2. Speaker and Title 2: Cambodia and LEAF (Mr Chhun Delux, Deputy Chief of
Forest Carbon Credit and climate change office : Cambodian Experience in
Implementing Decision Support Tool to Identify and Addressing Drivers of
Deforestation and Forest Degradation, and opportunity for ASEAN region)
38
LAMPIRAN
3. Speaker and Title 3: Indonesia (Dr. Arief Darmawan/Dr. Teddy Rusolono, REDD+
Agency : Development of REL/RL for REDD+ in Indonesia : approach, challenges,
and lessons learned)
4. Speaker and Title 4: Lao-PDR (Dr. Khamsene Ounaken, REDD+ Agency : Lessons
learned in implementing REDD+, what works and what doesnt for Lao PDR)
5. Speaker and Title 5 : Malaysia (Dr. Elizabeth Philip, Forest Research Institute of
Malaysia : Top Down Approach on REDD+ Implementation : Malaysian Experience)
6. Speaker and Title 5 : Philippines (Ms. Mayumi Quintos, ARKN-FCC National Focal
Point : Assessing Safeguards and Non-carbon Benefits in REDD+ Implementation
: experiences and lessons from Philippines)
7. Speaker and Title 6 : Vietnam (Dr. Nguyen Phu Hung- Director of Department
of Science, Technology and International Cooperation, VNFOREST : Development
of National Forest Monitoring System/NFMS and/or MRV System in Vietnam :
approach and lessons learned)
Rapporteur : Dr. Agus Suratno (GIZ GAP-CC) and Ms. Novia Widyaningtyas (Ministry
of Forestry, Indonesia)
Background reading: (up to 5 documents, please name titles and attach them or
provide links)
1. ASEAN common positions on REDD+ : submissions to the UNFCCC (www.
unfccc.int)
2. ARKN-FCC Terms of Reference (attached)
3. Individual AMS websites (not mentioned here as there are a number of websites
related to REDD+ in each ASEAN member States).
PROCEEDING
39
ANNEX 2.7
Check List of Draft Decision Support Tool for Identifying
and Addressing Drivers of Deforestation and Forest Degradation
Comments and/or
inputs (if any, could be
suggestions, alterations,
modifications, etc.)
please thick
No.
Points
Agree
Disagree
METHODOLOGY Step 1:
Information gathering phase and
drivers assessment
In this first step, a thorough assessment of all

the different driving forces exerting pressure on
forest areas needs to be done. Here it can be
helpful to distinguish explicitly between drivers
leading to deforestation versus those that cause
the degradation of forest cover. These are likely to
be different (or are different in their importance
of causing the problem) and it is also likely that
different actors have to be involved in addressing
these factors.
Step 1.1 - Assess current rates of

deforestation and forest degradation.
In order to obtain a clear picture of deforestation

and forest degradation, it is important to first
gather information on the magnitude of the
problem and to identify the main geographic
areas in which land-use change and forest
degradation is occurring. Information sources
can include literature reviews, reviews of
existing public global data sets on deforestation,
interpretation of remote sensing data, historical
maps based on field surveys, or expert interviews
(see Annex 1).To gain an accurate understanding
of deforestation and forest degradation a
historical time series should be assembled from
the period of the reference level using a minimum
of three time intervals.
Philippine: agree in principle

but at the moment wont be
able to comply the 3 times
interval
Malaysia: this draft is still

addressing on project level
only.
Not necessary to
mention 3 times interval,
depend
on
national
circumstances
Indonesia: minimum 3 time
interval is important to
compare each country, but
also recognize difficulties
in obtaining the necessary
data. Degradation needs to
be more specific.
Myanmar: do we have
definition
of
forest
degradation for the region?
->
Coordinator: we do not have
the definition. AMS could
define its own definition of
forest degradation
Cambodia: the time interval
should consider its capability
and resources on each AMS.
40
LAMPIRAN
Comments and/or
please thick
No.
Points
Agree
Disagree
As Table 1 shows, the methods and information

sources that are best for compiling the necessary
information on rates of deforestation and forest
degradation differ across geographical scales. This
also holds true for assessing the drivers that lead
to either one of the problems (see Step 1.3.b).
Step 1.2 - Identify drivers in key

deforestation/degradation areas.
In areas that have been identified as regions of

high deforestation and/or forest degradation,
information needs to be compiled on what the key
drivers are of deforestation and/or degradation, or
what predisposing conditions are present which
allow for deforestation and/or forest degradation
to occur. Methods for identifying significant
drivers are closely aligned with methods used
to identify rates of deforestation and forest
degradation including surveys of households and
communities in deforestation areas, participatory
rural appraisals, expert interviews, remote sensing
analysis, literature review, and the analysis of
national statistical information (see Annex 1).As
with Step 1.1, no single method should be relied
upon to provide a comprehensive analysis. Asking
communities or households on their perceptions
or knowledge on what caused the changes
detected in forest could for example be brought
together with statistical data on logging activities
or changes in agricultural land in the area and
their causes. It is important in this data gathering
phase to include information on both how the
change occurred, as well as who caused it (see
Step 1.3 e).
Indonesia:
what
is
the definition of high
deforestation?
any
deforestation over 0,5% is
high (FAO)
The information derived from one or a number of

the described methods can be brought together
in the form of a systems diagram showing how
the change in forest cover has been caused and
why (see Figure 4). When assessing drivers, it
should be clearly differentiated between factors
leading to forest degradation versus factors
causing complete deforestation. The drivers for
either can be different and countries could also
choose just to prioritize addressing one set of
drivers over the other.
Step 1.3 Analysis of drivers
Drivers have various characteristics that are

important to assess, as they will determine
which measures are appropriate for reducing
the pressure a driver exerts. While it is possible
to deal with many drivers, others are out of the
reach of a specific actor or decision maker. This
is particularly the case for so-called natural
drivers, such as geological or biological processes
Malaysia: the data needed

on DST is still subjective
(80%)
PROCEEDING
41
Comments and/or
please thick
No.
Points
Agree
Disagree
that are impossible to influence by humans.

Most, but not all man-made drivers, however,
can be controlled. An analysis of drivers should
therefore include the following characteristics for
each driver, as these will be important both for
prioritizing and developing intervention options:
7
a. Direct or indirect driver of deforestation and

forest degradation: Direct drivers are defined
as human activities that directly reduce forest
carbon stocks, either through deforestation or
forest degradation (e.g. Geist and Lambin 2002;
Schaeffer et al. 2005; Kissinger et al. 2012).
Indirect drivers are defined as the complex
interactions of larger scale factors underlying
direct drivers. They often operate diffusely and
influence more than one direct driver (Millennium
Ecosystem Assessment 2003). Understanding
how a driver acts is key for devising the most
appropriate interventions, for selecting the
relevant actors that need to address the driver
and for avoiding unintended consequences that
can arise with implanting interventions to address
a driver(see more in Step 3 and 4).
b. The scale at which the driver operates:

Drivers can operate at the local, national or
international scale. Information on the scale
of operation is important when deciding on
intervention options as the scale determines
which actors can control a particular driver
(usually a higher scale actor can control a lower
scale driver, e.g. a national government can exert
power over a local driver, such as illegal logging
practices, while it is difficult for the government
to control an international one, e.g. international
commodity prices.).
Coordinators: focus on
national and subnational
drivers
c. Identifying trends and trajectories in

drivers: The direction of a driver and the pressure
it exerts can change over time. Understanding
some of the trends that can be foreseen for a
driver, if it will become more important or not in
the future, is very helpful when deciding what
drivers to address within a specific location. If for
example prices of a certain agricultural commodity
whose expansion has driven deforestation in the
past, such as palm oil, are likely to rise in the
future, addressing this driver will have a higher
priority than if prices are foreseen to decline. See
Annex2for an overview of methodologies that
can assist in analyzing drivers trends.
Malaysia: potential policy

issue in the future may
interfere the drivers, need
to be accommodated in
the tools
10
d. Drivers interactions: Drivers interact with

each other to produce different outcomes. The
most obvious interactions can be seen between
one or more indirect driver that influence a
particular direct driver, e.g. demographic and
economic drivers determining the expansion of
42
LAMPIRAN
Comments and/or
please thick
No.
Points
Agree
Disagree
agricultural land into forest areas. The interactions

are not always obvious or easy to detect requiring
careful analysis of land use data together with
other types of information, such as national
statistical information, policy analysis documents
etc. There is, however, an emerging literature on
how certain sets of drivers interact across a range
of settings, and methods such as the Syndromes
Approach (Bishop 2011) can be helpful when
mapping out the system. Understanding systemic
interactions between drivers in a specific
location is essential to devising successful driver
intervention strategies and will help to detect
and mitigate unintended consequences of
intervention strategies.
e. Identification of key actors associated
with the identified drivers. Identifying clearly
who the actors are that are associated with a
particular driver is important information needed
for prioritizing drivers to address as well as when
selecting the appropriate intervention options.
How to identify the actors for each driver
depends on the specific driver and the country
situation as well as on if the driver is an indirect
or a direct driver and therefore how remote it
is from causing the change in forests visible on
the ground. In many cases it will be relatively
straightforward who the actors are that can be
associated with a driver and should result from
the gathered information in Step 1.2. If illegal
logging is for example identified as an important
direct driver, it is likely that the actors associated
with it will come from a list of inhabitants of
the area, such as farmers or villagers, logging
companies, or local government officials.
12
Upon completion of Step 1 the following output

outcomes should be available:
Maps/Information on key deforestation/forest
degradation areas
Information on all the drivers associated
with land conversion/degradation and their
relationship
Mapping of the actors associated with each
driver
An understanding of the system within which
deforestation/forest degradation takes place
Malaysia: bullet 2 remove

them all. too detailed
and
academic,
bullet
4. What system does it
mean?
METHODOLOGY Step 2: Select

drivers to address
13
Once the relevant information on land use

changes, deforestation and forest degradation
and the factors driving this process is compiled
a selection needs to be made as to which drivers
should be addressed and how. Since not all
drivers can be addressed by the actors involved
11
Indonesia: move to b,
Myanmar:
local
government is driver of
illegal logging?
Coordinator: number e. is
problematic,
PROCEEDING
43
Comments and/or
please thick
No.
Points
Agree
Disagree
in the process an important distinction should be

made from the beginning between drivers that
can be addressed and those that actors will have
to adapt to. Drivers that cannot be addressed
directly include certain events, such as biological
or geological processes as well as international
drivers that are difficult to control by national or
local decision makers. That said, adaptation does
not mean that nothing can be done about these
drivers or that no action is required. These drivers
should still be clearly identified in the process
as they will still require the implementation of
measure to deal with them.
14
Addressing drivers will affect various stakeholders

inside and outside the forestry sector. It is
therefore imperative to set up a process that is
consultative and cross-sectoral, i.e. that includes
representatives from all the actor groups identified
in Step 1. This will also later help to ensure their
cooperation and buy-in into measures selected
to address a specific driver. Notwithstanding this,
from the beginning of the process it needs to be
clear who will take decisions on which driver to
address with a given intervention.
Step 2.1 Select criteria to prioritize

drivers
15
Different stakeholders will have different opinions

on the drivers identified in Step 1 and how to
address them. A set of criteria should be defined
and negotiated across all stakeholders that will be
involved or affected by addressing these drivers.
Part of the selection process should include a
negotiation of how criteria will set the priority
for which drivers to address. These criteria can
include a wide range of options, such as:
Importance of a driver (i.e. the level of carbon
emissions resulting from it),
Ease of addressing a driver (i.e. political
feasibility),
Whether the driver can be changed or
controlled, or if one must adapt to it,
Importance to particular stakeholders (e.g.,
measured by survey)
Opportunity costs,
Contribution of driver to economic growth
and poverty alleviation
Co-benefits from addressing the driver of
other social or environmental goals,
Risks associated with addressing a certain
driver.
Since there are likely to be different biases,
the establishment of a clear decision-making
structure with conflict management tools in place
is important to ensure the smooth execution and
ultimate success of the process.
Philippine: criteria should

be according to each
country decision
44
LAMPIRAN
Malaysia: criteria bullet

3, what is the meaning
of the driver can be
changed
Comments and/or
please thick
No.
Points
Agree
Disagree
Step 2.2 - Rank drivers
16
Once criteria have been selected a ranking of

drivers should be performed. Each driver needs
to be assessed compared to the other identified
drivers for a specific criterion. Since the ranking
might differ by country and/or region, it should
be made clear from the outset at which scale the
responsible entity addressing the problem can act.
The driver ranking process allows stakeholders to
make a transparent decision about which drivers
should be addressed in which order and why.
Outcomes of step 2
Clear prioritization of drivers to address with
rationale for decisions made
Clear understanding of which drivers should
not be addressed or addressed later and
rationale for the choice
METHODOLOGY Step 3: Designing

interventions to address prioritized
drivers
17
It should now be clear which drivers should be

addressed in a country or region, in which order
they should be addressed, and the trend in impacts
that drivers are likely to have in the future. There
should also be a clear set of criteria on how these
drivers were selected to ensure transparency in
the process. At this point, stakeholders should
design interventions to address these drivers.
18
A wide range of measures to address drivers

of deforestation and forest degradation exist,
which can be political, technical, financial or a
combination of these factors. A useful framework
for understanding how interventions can be
implemented uses three criteria based on the
outcome that an intervention can achieve:
Incentives: Will the intervention create an
incentive that changes the behavior of a
particular actor towards more sustainable
activities?
Disincentive: Will it create a disincentive
against unsustainable practices?
Enabling environment: Will it develop the
enabling conditions for sustainable practices?
Malaysia: term incentive

are beyond REDD, it is
under the
control of
Ministry of Finance.
19
Table 4 describes various interventions using

this classification. In addition the table shows
at which geographical scale these interventions
should be implemented. During this design
process, the assessment of the scale at which
drivers operate (done during Step 1) becomes
important. If the scale at which the intervention
can be implemented is not the same as the scale
at which the driver operates, it is unlikely that
the measure will be successful in meeting the
expected outcome.
PROCEEDING
45
Comments and/or
please thick
No.
Points
Agree
Disagree
It should be noted that generally, because these

drivers are easier to control, solutions to drivers
have most often been suggested at the local
level, and to a lesser extent at the national scale
(Kissinger et al 2012). All important drivers, no
matter their scale, should be addressed, or efforts
to reduce deforestation and forest degradation
will only be reduced, but never stopped. In this
regard, international level efforts to address
global drivers of deforestation will play an
essential role to fully address deforestation and
forest degradation.
Coordinator : No matter
their scale -> proposed to
delete
Thailand:
important
changed to high priority or
major or main
Myanmar: important term
is higher than major
Vietnam:
but
never
stopped is inappropriate
Step 3.1 - Select criteria to prioritize

possible driver intervention strategies
20
A number of criteria can help to select the best

intervention strategies to address the prioritized
drivers in a particular setting. These include:
Scale at which the driver operates and
therefore if the driver can be controlled by
the respective decision makers (e.g. national
and sub-national government)
Ease of implementation
Affected actors
Scale at which the implementing actor(s)
work
Compliance under and fit with existing policy
and legal environment
Leverage across multiple drivers
Applicability in various settings and countries
(particularly for cross-country interventions)
Costs and benefits of the interventions
(including political costs)
Risk of failing
- Current policies
Indonesia: adding subnational government

Malaysia: adding current
policies to criteria ->
delete compliance under
and
Cambodia: add good
governance to criteria
Coordinator: need to
clarify bullet 6. various
Setting and countries ?
Coordinator: including
political cost?
Step 3.2 - Rank possible intervention

strategies per driver
21
Depending on the chosen criterion/criteria to

prioritize the interventions for the selected
drivers a ranking can be done in order to achieve
a transparent decision on which measures to
implement. This ranking might reveal trade-offs
across possible interventions, e.g. a particular
intervention might be easy to implement, but
will affect important stakeholders negatively.
Documenting these trade-offs during the ranking
process will ensure that implementable and
sustainable decision will result from the ranking.
22
Different methods can help in the process of

ranking drivers and moving towards a decision
(see Annex 3). These can include more quantitative
methods such as cost-benefit analysis, complex
methods such as Scenario Planning or simple
tools such as qualitative, participatory ranking
Singapore: what is scenario

planning -> normally used
by institution who conduct
planning / development
planning who looks at
cross cutting issue
46
LAMPIRAN
Comments and/or
please thick
No.
Points
Agree
Disagree
during a workshop. Each of these approaches

will yield information with differing degrees of
depth and require of course different amounts
for human and financial resources.
Malaysia: this DST is likely

to be used by economic
planning and go beyond
REDD+
Singapore
propose:
Different
methods,
quantitative
and/or
qualitative methods can
help the process of ranking
drivers
and
moving
towards a decision.
Step 3.3 - Assess conformity

compliance of selected intervention
with existing policy frameworks
23
An important consideration for selecting

interventions is if they comply with existing policy
frameworks at the local, national or international
level (e.g. compliance with Cancun safeguards,
national laws related to the protection of
indigenous people, or local customary laws). In
some cases interventions that seem to be the
most straightforward or successful for addressing
an important driver do not fully comply with
existing national policy frameworks. In others
the appropriate national frameworks may not
exist to implement a given intervention (e.g.
the definition of carbon tenure at the national
level). In these cases interventions proposed may
will need to be supported via policy or legislative
revision. Depending on the intervention chosen,
this may could be done either via a modification
existing law or regulations, or via a longer
process of developing an entirely new policy or
legislation.
Thailand: objection with

compliance
Indonesia : changed with
conformity; Malaysia :
changed with coherence
Singapore: use conformity
or
coherence
instead
compliance to soften
Note: consultant need to
reformulate the paragraph
Step 3.4 - Final decision on priority

interventions and implementation
strategy
24
Next, a decision needs to be made on which

interventions to implement, and how and who
the responsible actor for each intervention
is. This should then result in sharing the
proposed implementation strategy or plan with
government agencies and all involved parties (see
also Step 4). Here, it will be important to also
carefully conduct outreach and engagement to
ensure that all relevant actors are aware of the
results of the drivers assessment process and
the decisions taken on the various measures to
be implemented. If the stakeholder engagement
process was well designed from the beginning,
this step will be less important than if there were
any gaps or conflicts along the way.
PROCEEDING
47
Comments and/or
please thick
No.
Points
Step 3.5 - Design a timeline for

implementation of interventions and a
system to monitor implementation
Agree
Disagree
Malaysia: title: REDD+

plan already have timeline,
how is it going to be
associated?
Propose to change 3.5
with
Mainstreaming
selected interventions to
the national strategy /
action plan of REDD+
25
In a final step, a clear timeline for implementation

of the selected interventions needs to be
established and a system created that allows
monitoring if the implementation happens
accordingly. For this, the entity responsible for the
overall oversight of the process could for example
establish a set of indicators that show progress
of the implementation process. Here it is also
important to ensure that the timeline corresponds
to the schedule established for REDD+ activities
in a country.
Need to reformulate based

on new proposed title
26
Outcomes of step 3
Set of priority interventions to address most
important drivers and their costs and benefits
An implementation strategy and timeline for
all selected interventions
Good understanding of intervention
pathways
Good understanding of actors that need to
be involved
Good understanding of key partners
METHODOLOGY Step 4:
Implementation of selected
interventions to address the
prioritized drivers (In this step all
the results of the previous analysis are
brought together and implementation
of all the agreed measures starts)
Step 4 onwards were not

discussed
Note by Coordinator : as
there are different views
in treating Steps 4-5, it
was agreed to continue
the discussion on Step 4
onwards :
Suggestion to Consultants:
Allow the users select the
most appropriate option
for them :
Option 1 : Steps 1 -3 and
integrate Steps 4-5 into
the implementation of
REDD+ national strategy/
action plan.
Option 2 : Keep all steps.
48
Step 4.1 - Develop or strengthen

an institutional implementation
mechanism
LAMPIRAN
Comments and/or
please thick
No.
Points
Agree
Disagree
27
Ideally a lead agency should be established

to ensure a successful implementation of the
selected measures and coordination across all
the different actors that need to be involved
in the process, such as the coordination across
a set of ministries for example. In addition,
a mechanism should be set up that ascribes
decision-making competencies to the selected
institutions. For this a cross institutional task
force can be very helpful as it ensure the
dialogue across the various actors that need to
be involved in implementing the tool.
Step 4.2 - Establish a stakeholder

coordination mechanism for
implementation
28
The key to successful implementation of all

selected measures is the acceptance of all
stakeholders into the decisions taken about the
selected measure(s). As described, in Step 1all
the important actors associated with a driver
were mapped. In many cases these actors are
likely to be associated with a number of drivers.
This information is now crucial for setting up a
mechanism that allows for coordination with the
relevant stakeholders on the selected measures
and for developing a transparent information
sharing system.
Step 4.3 - Test intervention options in

pilot projects as appropriate
29
Depending on the measure selected for

addressing a certain driver it might be good to
first test its implementation in a specific location.
This will allow for learning from the implantation
and for easy monitoring of the effects of the
interventions in a small location. In case the
test reveals that there are still big difficulties in
the process and the selected interventions, the
implementing team might have to go back to
Step 2 or 3.
Step 4.4 Roll out full implementation

strategy
30
Depending on the timeline created in Step

3, a strategy needs to be agreed upon and
finalized on how all the selected interventions
can be coordinated with each other, who the
responsible implementation agency is for each
intervention and how implementation will
take place. A reporting system will have to be
established so that the entity charged with the
oversight of the whole process can monitor
progress.
PROCEEDING
49
Comments and/or
please thick
No.
Points
Agree
Disagree
31
Outcomes of step 4
A strategy for implementing the selected
interventions
If needed, a strategy to gain allies/deal with
obstacles
METHODOLOGY Step 5:
Monitoring and evaluating success
of interventions
32
This final step in the process is often omitted

in processes to address drivers. Learning from
success and failures of the implemented measures
and assessing if the measures actually led to a
reduction of deforestation or forest degradation
is needed in order to ensure that interventions
can be adjusted along the way and potential
negative consequences addressed as soon as
possible. To do that, we need a monitoring and
evaluation system.
Step 5.1 - Assess effectiveness of the

implementation strategy
33
In order to assess if the strategy for implementing

the interventions to address the selected drivers
of deforestation and forest degradation is
working and shows the excepted results, a
number of criteria have to be selected that help
in monitoring the effectiveness of the strategy.
These criteria will differ according to assessed
intervention, but a general list can include:
Assessment of deforestation or forest
degradation trends in the target area;
Implementation of interventions according to
an agreed upon time line;
Effects on the target population (e.g. change
in behavior);
Effects on non-target population;
Effects on a set of environmental variables;
Creation of co-benefits with respect to social
or environmental outcomes.
34
In addition to assessing the effectiveness of the

strategy, its efficiency or its outcomes for equitability
can also be evaluated. At the beginning of the
Step 5 it should be clarified what to assess exactly
and the criteria should be chosen accordingly.
The ultimate indicator of success of the strategy
though will be if deforestation or forest
degradation has been reduced. The results of the
implementation strategy assessment will then
have to be used to decide on changes that need
to be made to the strategy (also see 5.3).
Step 5.2 - Assess stakeholder

engagement
50
LAMPIRAN
Comments and/or
please thick
No.
Points
Agree
Disagree
35
As mentioned, across all four previous steps the

involvement of stakeholders along the process is
essential to successfully implementing measures
to reduce deforestation and forest degradation.
Stakeholder engagement can therefore be an
indicator of whether or not the process is going
well. If, for example, stakeholders dropped off
from certain tasks or engagement mechanisms
this can be a sign that the overall process could
face problems. Learning from what went wrong
where is important for making adjustments in
time and for the next iteration of the process.
36
Criteria to assess stakeholder engagement can

include:
How long stakeholders were engaged;
If difficult issues arose how they were addressed;
Leadership shown by different stakeholders.
Step 5.3 - Adjust implementation

strategy accordingly
37
The lessons from assessing the implementation

strategy and the stakeholder engagement need
to be translated into adjustments to the overall
implementation strategy. This will ultimately
help to achieve the long term success of the
whole process outlined here to address drivers
of deforestation and forest degradation as short
comings can be addressed in time before they
jeopardize all the work done. These lessons
should also be documented carefully so that
they can then also be introduced into the next
iteration of the process, if the process (or some
of the first steps) is repeated to ensure that all
drivers are addressed sufficiently. They also need
to be reported back to the government and the
relevant and involved stakeholders so that they
can see why and how adjustments should and
will be made.
38
Outcomes of Step 5
Strategy for adjustments and revisions
Before-and-after comparison
PROCEEDING
51
ANNEX 2.8
Pan Pacific Nirwana Bali Resort, Bali - INDONESIA
4-6 March 2014
Documentation
Photo Session
Dissucusion Session
52
LAMPIRAN
Dissucusion Session
Field Trip
PROCEEDING
53
ANNEX
PROCEEDING
55
ANNEX 3.1
Mercure Serpong Alam Sutera Hotel - INDONESIA
7 8 May 2014
AGENDA
TUESDAY, 6 MAY 2014
Start 13.00
Check-in Mercure Serpong Alam Sutera Hotel
Day 1 - WEDNESDAY, 7 MAY 2014

08.00 - 09.00
Registration
09.00 - 10.00
Discussion on possible elements for joint submission on SIS-REDD+
10.00 - 11.00
Opening Session :
Remarks by ASEAN Secretariat representative
Remarks by GAP-CC representative
Remarks by Coordinator of ARKN-FCC
Opening remarks by ASOF Leader of Indonesia
11.00 - 11.30
Coffee break
OC
MC
Morning Session :
11.30 - 11.40
Adoption of the meeting agenda
11.40 - 13.00
a. Presentation and Discussion on Experiences and lessons learned

from the development of SIS-REDD+ in Indonesia
b. Discussion on possible elements for joint submission on SISREDD+ (continued)

13.00 - 14.30
Lunch break
Afternoon Session :
14.30 - 17.00
a. Presentation relating to NMAs and NCBs of REDD+ in SBSTA-40

(by Jenny Wong, UNFCCC Secretariat, through SKYPE)
b. Discussion to prepare draft ASEAN joint presentation in
SBSTA-40 (closed meeting)
Coordinator of ARKN-FCC and

ASEC Representative
Day 2 - THURSDAY, 8 MAY 2014

Morning session :
08.30 - 12.30
Presentation and Discussion on National Policy and Programme in

Forestry and other land sectors by AMS :

12.30 - 13.30
ASEC Representative
Malaysia
Philippines
Indonesia
Cambodia
Thailand
Other AMS (tbc)
Lunch break
Afternoon Session :
13.30 - 14.30
Further discussion on issues from Day 1 and Day 2
14.30 15.00
Coffee break
15.00 - 16.30
Other Issues
16.30 - 17.00
Closing
56
LAMPIRAN
ANNEX 3.2
LIST OF PARTICIPANTS
JAKARTA INDONESIA, 7-8 MAY 2014
No
Country
BRUNEI
DARUSSALAM
CAMBODIA
INDONESIA
No
Name
Official
Designation /
Position
Institution
Contact Detail
Mailing Address
Phone Number
E-mail
Mr. Hj. Saidin

Salleh
Director of Forestry
/ ASOF Leader
Forestry
Department,
Ministry of Industry
and Primary
Resources, BRUNEI
DARUSSALAM
Jl. Menteri Besar

Berkas BB 3910
Bandar Seri
Begawan BB
3910, BRUNEI
DARUSSALAM
Tel (office) : 6732381687
saidinsalleh@gmail.com
Mr. Joffre Haji

Ali Ahmad
Head of Forest
Education and
Training
Forestry
Departement
Ministry of Industry
and Primary
Resources
Jl. Menteri Besar

Berkas BB 3910
Bandar Seri
Begawan BB 3910
Tel (office) : 6732381687
Joffre.aliahmad@forestry.
gov.bn
Fax : +673
3230766
Jofrfre7579@gmail.com
Deputy Chief of
Monitoring and
Evaluation Office
Forestry
Administration,
Ministry of
Agriculture,
Forestry and
Fisheries
#40, Norodom
Blvd, Phonm Penh,
CAMBODIA
Tel. (Office) :
85523214651,
Tel. (Mobile) :
85512997479
sobonit@yahoo.com
Mr. Kim Sobon
fr.sobon@gmail.com
Fax : 85523212201
Mr. Thuch
Phalla
Deputy Chief,
Habitats
Management and
nature Based EcoTourist Office
Forestry
#40, Norodom
Administration,
Blvd, Phnom Penh.
Ministry of
CAMBODIA
Agriculture, Forestry
and Fisheries,
CAMBODIA
Tel (Office) : 855

23 214 651 ; Tel
(Mobile) : 855 12
509 995, Fax : 855
23 212 201
thuchphallafa@gmail.
com
Dr. Nur
Masripatin
Director/
Coordinator of
ARKN-FCC
Centre for
Standardization
and Environment,
Republic of
Indonesia
Manggala
Wanabakti Building
Block VII, 8th Fl.
Tel (Office) :+62 21

5733433
nurmasripatin@ymail.
com
Centre for
Standardization
and Environment,
Republic of
Indonesia
Manggala
Wanabakti Building
Block VII, 8th Fl.
Forest Planning
Agency
Manggala
Wanabakti Building
Block VII, 8th Fl.
3.
Mrs. Novia
Widyaningtyas
Head of Climate
Change Division
Mr. Hengky
Wijaya
Jl.Jend. Gatot
Subroto, Jakarta
INDONESIA
Jl.Jend. Gatot
Subroto, Jakarta
Indonesia
Tel (Mobile) :
+628121970235
Fax : :+62 21
5733433
Tel (Office) :+62 21
5733433
widyaningtyasnovia@
gmail.com
Tel (Mobile) :
+6281329346418
Fax : :+62 21
5733433
widyaningtyas@yahoo.
com
Tel (Office ) 02518633944
Dewiratna_sahidhi@
yahoo.com
Jl.Jend. Gatot
Subroto, Jakarta
Indonesia
4.
Mr. John Pieter
Forest Planning
Agency
Manggala
Wanabakti Building
Block VII, 8th Fl.
Jl.Jend. Gatot
Subroto, Jakarta
Indonesia
5.
6.
Ms. Dewi Ratna

Kurnia Sari,
S.Hut., M.Si
Researcher
Mr. Donny
Wicaksono,
S.Hut., M.Sc.
Researcher
Centre of Forestry
Reasearch and
Development of
Climate Change
and Policy
Jl. Gunung Batu

No.5 PO BOX. 272
Bogor 16118
Centre of Forestry
Reasearch and
Development of
Climate Change
and Policy
Jl. Gunung Batu

No.5 PO BOX. 272
Bogor 16118
Mobile
+6287870172299
Fax 0251-8634924
Tel (Office ) 02518633944
donnywicaks@yahoo.com
Mobile
+6287870172299
Fax 0251-8634924
PROCEEDING
57
No
Country
No
7.
MALAYSIA
MYANMAR
PHILIPPINES
Ms.Ulfah Zul
Farisa
Dr. Elizabeth
Philip
Mr. Md Razie
Bin Harun
Madin
Name
Dr. Myat Su
Mon
Mr. Sein Htoon

Linn
Official
Designation /
Position
Institution
Planning and
Statistics
Department
Mobile
+6287853738883
Forest Research
Institute Malaysia
(FRIM)
FRIM, 52109
Kepong Selangor
Tel (Office) : +603

6279 7249/ +603
8886 107 , Tel
(Mobile) : +6013
287 8801 , Fax :
+603 6280 4625
philip@nre.gov.my ;
philip@frim.gov.my
Ministry of Natural
Resources and
Environment,
MALAYSIA
Level 12, Wisma

Sumber Asli No.
25, Persiaran
Perdana, Precinct
4, Putrajaya,
MALAYSIA
Tel (Office) : +603

88861446,
mrazie@nre.gov.my
Planning and
Statistic Division,
Forest Department,
MYANMAR
Building No.39
Forest Department
Head Quarter, Nay
Pyi Taw, MYANMAR
Tel : +95-06405109
Ministry of
Environmental
Conservation and
Forestry, Nay Pyi
Taw, MYANMAR
Building No.
28, Ministers
Office, Ministry
of Environmental
Conservation and
Forestry, Nay Pyi
Taw, MYANMAR
Tel : +95-067405384
Pacifico Ortiz Hall,

Social Development
Complex Ateneo de
manila University,
Loyola Heights,
Quezon City 1108,
Phillippines
Tel (Office) : +63 2 ayadeleon@gmail.com

426 6001 loc. 4649.
Tel (Mobile) : 63917
847 1282
FMB-DENR, Visayas
Avenue, Diliman,
Quezon City 1100,
PHILIPPINES
Tel (Office): +632-9274784, Tel

(Mobile) : +63-9175153447,
Ms. Alaya
Manalastas de
Leon
Senior Legal and

Policy Specialist /
REDD+ Negotiator
Ateneo School of
Government
Ms. Mayumi
QuintosNatividad
OIC, Assistant
Director
Forest management
Bureau,
Department of
Environment and
Natural Resources,
SINGAPORE
Fax : +6213511403
Tel (Mobile) :
+6018 7920068 ,
Fax : +603 8890
4504/ +603 8890
4021
sumonforest@gmail.com
Fax : +95-067405016
linn.seinhtoon@gmail.
com
Fax : +95-067405012
mayquin@mozcom.com
mayquin2003@yahoo.
com
Fax : +63-29282778
PHILIPPINES
7
Ulfah.farisa@gmail.com
Jl. MH. Thamrin

No.8 Jakarta 10340
Indonesia
Head of Climate
Change & Forestry
Programme/
REDD+ Negotiator
Director,
E-mail
Tle (office ) : +6221

3522400
National Council on
Climate Change
Assistant Director,
RS and GIS Section
Phone Number
BPPT Building 1,
15-16th Floor
Staff on Land Use,

Land Use Change
and Forestry
Working Group
Assistant Secretary
Contact Detail
Mailing Address
Mr. Hassan bin Senior Manager

Ibrahim
Biodiversity /
Terrestrial
National
Biodiversity Centre,
National Parks
Board, SINGAPORE
1 Cluny Road,
Tel (Office):
SNGAPORE 259569 +6564651676,
Dr. Suchitra
Changtragoon
Forest and Plant

Conservation
Research Office
Department of
National Parks,
Wildlife and Plant
Conservation,
THAILAND
Department of
National Parks,
Wildlife and Plant
Conservation, 61
Phaholyothin,
Chutuchak,
Bangkok, 10900
THAILAND
Tel (Office): +66

2 561 0777 ext.
1440, 1441.
The Royal Forest

Department,
THAILAND
61 Phaholyothin
Rd, Ladyao,
Chatucuk, Bangkok,
10900 THAILAND
Tel. (Office) :+66

86070 3738;
Forest Inventory
and Planning
Institute
Ngoc Hoi- Thanh

Tri- Hanoi,
VIETNAM
Tel. (Office) : +84 4

37332263
Hassan_ibrahim@nparks.
gov.sg
Tel (Mobile) :
+6581981903
Fax : +656655196
THAILAND
VIETNAM
Ms. Prattana
Meesincharoen
Mr. Nguyen Ba
Quyen
Expert on Forest
Conservation
Research / ARKNFCC Focal Point and
REDD+ Negotiator
Thailand ASOF
Leader
FIPI
Tel (Mobile) : +084

751 2499,
Fax : +66 2 561
0777 ext. 1440,
662 5799576
LAMPIRAN
prattana71@gmail.com
Tel (Mobile) : +66

2562 4292-3 &
5673 ; Fax : +66
2561 429-3 & 5034
Tel (Mobile) : +84

914 916 016
Fax :
58
suchitra.changtragoon@
gmail.com
quyengb@gmail.com
No
Country
No
Name
Mr. Nguyen
Quang Vinh
Official
Designation /
Position
Forest Inventory
Expert
Institution
Vietnam Forest
Inventory and
Planning InstituteFIPI, VIETNAM
Contact Detail
Mailing Address
Phone Number
Vinh Quynh
Commune Thanh Tri
District Ha Noi City,
VIETNAM
Tel. (Office) : +84 4

38613858
E-mail
vihnfipi@gmail.com
Tel (Mobile) :
+84 987298180,
+84.903472525
Fax :
+84.043.86121881
10
11
ASEAN
SECRETARIAT
GAP-CC
2.
Mr. Dian
Sukmajaya
Mr. Thiomas
Heindrichs
Dr. Agus
Suratno
Senior Officer
Team Leader
Advisor
ASEAN Secretariat
70A, Jalan
Sisingamangaraja,
Tel : +62 21 726

2991 Ext 484
Jakarta, Indonesia
Fax : +62 21 739

8234/724 3504
ASEAN-German
Programme on
Response to
Climate Change
(GAP-CC)
Deutsche
Gesellschaft fr
Internationale
Zusammenarbeit
(GIZ) GmbH
Menara BCA, 46th

Floor
Tel: + 62 21 2358
7111
Jl. M.H. Thamrin

No.1
F + 62 21 2358
7110
Jakarta 10310,
Indonesia
M + 62 813
187171 96
ASEAN-German
Programme on
Response to
Climate Change
(GAP-CC)
Deutsche
Gesellschaft fr
Internationale
Zusammenarbeit
(GIZ) GmbH
Menara BCA, 46th

Floor
Tel: + 62 21 2358
7111
Jl. M.H. Thamrin

No.1
F + 62 21 2358
7110
Jakarta 10310,
Indonesia
M + 62 813
187171 96
dian.sukmajaya@
asean.org
agus.suratno@giz.de
PROCEEDING
59
ANNEX 3.3
a. OPENING REMARKS BY ASEAN SECRETARIAT REPRESENTATIVE
Very good morning,
Distinguished ASOF Leader Indonesia, Coordinator of ARKN FCC, Leader of GAP CC GIZ and
colleagues from ASEAN member representatives, Ladies and gentlemen,
First of all on behalf of ASEAN Secretariat, I would like to thank to host country, Indonesia, for
excellent work and to organizing the 9th ARKN-FCC meeting. I would like to also appreciate GAP CC
GIZ for generous support for the network. I would like to welcome and congratulate all members
for their active cooperation in the network so far. I noticed that network has produces many outputs
and significant works also contribute to the ASEAN forestry cooperation in general in terms of joint
submission. I believe in the coming future, the network can contribute to ASEAN communities.
We all know that 2015 is just few months ahead to meet ASEAN economics integration. This year
is the beginning process on ASEAN economic integration in communities. That is way that we are
happy to know that AMS are thinking moving forward to 2015 agenda. There is need to develop
research in ASEAN communities such as forest management, forest certification, social forestry, and
the latest issue/cross-cutting issue is climate change.
So many of you have known that ASEAN Secretariat has ASEAN Ministerial Meeting of Agriculture
and Forestry, and we are also address issues on forestry, agriculture, fisheries, and research and
development on agriculture. Without the active participation of AMS, ASEAN Secretariat could
effective cooperate in ASEAN development in the future. And of course our cooperation with
partner from GAP CC GIZ, we are very positive that we can move forward to post-2015 agenda.
Distinguished Ladies and Gentlemen,
To work for legally binding instrument of climate change after the Kyoto Protocol, ASEAN Secretariat
has delivered clear message to the UNFCCC Secretariat in joint submission and has been recognized
by our leader as one of important outputs for the ASEAN forest cooperation in our countries. This
network was actually started by ASOF to work in common ground of ASEAN in the implementation
of mitigation and adaptation to climate change. We could maintain this momentum to strengthen
our position in UNFCCC.
I would like to extend appreciation to GAP CC for the support in this network. In this occasion I
would like to congratulate to all members for some significant achievement and hoping in this
meeting will befruitful and much productive. Therefore I am closing my opening remarks and thank
you very much.
Dian Sukmajaya
Senior Officer
Agriculture Industries & Natural Resources Division
Finance, Industry & Infrastructure Directorate
ASEAN Economic Community (AEC) Department
ASEAN Secretariat
60
LAMPIRAN
b. OPENING REMARKS BY LEADER OF GAP CC

Dear ASOF Leader, Coordinator of ARKN-FCC and members and other guests,
Since 2012, GAP-CC supported the ARKN-FCC. The challenges that we met in the progress is how
to collaborate the need of regional level and AMS state. Ministry of Environment Germany already
approved the support GAP-CC for ARKN-FCC to 2017. We see the need for ASEAN member to
issues of respond climate change and how AMS respond this issue in regional and international
level. GAP-CC will continue to support within ASEAN member and beyond ASEC with this network
as a good example. GAP-CC will continue to support to strengthening national and regional
networks regarding the issues to respond climate change. There are some questions in Forestry
that GAP-CC would like to get from all of you: what would be the most relevant of the forestry
issues in regional level, what should be prioritized, what could be reached for the next 20 years in
forestry issues, where should be support on the national level in climate change support and which
institution should collaborated. This network could used to sharing the knowledge, experience,
and challenges in forestry and climate change issues among AMS countries and beneficial to other
countries as well. I would like to invite ARKN-FCC to help GAP-CC in improving the concept for
2015. Thank you for your participations.
Mr. Thomas Heindriech (GAP-CC GIZ)
Leader ASEAN-German Programme on Response to Climate Change (GAP-CC)
Deutsche Gesellschaft fr
Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH
c. OPENING REMARKS BY ARKN-FCC Coordinator

Distinguished of ASOF Leader in Indonesia, Mr. Ida Bagus Putera Parthama
Representaive of GERMAN-ASEAN Programme on Response to Climate Change (GAP-CC),
Mr. Thomas Heindriech,
Representative of GAP-CC, Mr. Agus Suratno
Good Morning, Assalamualaikum Wr. Wb. It is my pleasure to have ASOF Leader in Indonesia,
Leader GAP-CC, and representative of ASEAN Secretariat. Here we have nine representatives
from ASEAN member in this meeting. First of all thanks to ASOF Leader in Indonesia to a very
supportive for activities in maintaining the network in Jakarta and other nine capitals. Thank
to Mr. Dian to continue support in this networks. Thank to Nr. Thomas for continuous support
from GAP-CC and for the GAP-CC for allowing the regional and national process with no
interference in the subject. We would like to maintain the program and common address in
ASEAN climate change activities through this network. GAP-CC continues to support to 2017,
and we would like to discuss this tomorrow. And thank you for your questions, it help us to
focus our discussion tomorrow.
I also would like to thank for our AMS representatives for the spirit in this network and we
recognize the diversity, differences and uniqueness among us. By recognizing our diversity,
differences and uniqueness among us, we able to focus our commonalities and trying to
recognizing them. I think this ARKN-FCC with discussion of REDD+ and forest and climate
change issues and would like to continue on focusing on this issue. But also we discuss about
PROCEEDING
61
the diversity of forest cover and policies and planning. The diversity of forest cover, policies
and planning can be a lesson learned for ASEAN. With this I am closing my opening remarks.
Thank you, Wassalamualaikum Wr. Wb.
Dr. Nur Masripatin
ARKN-FCC Coordinator
d. OPENING REMARKS BY ASOF LEADER OF INDONESIA

Distinguished Representatives of ASEAN Member States,
Honorable Leader of GERMAN-ASEAN Programme on Response to Climate Change (GAP-CC), Mr.
Thomas Heindriech,
Representative of GAP-CC, Mr. Agus Suratno,
Coordinator of ASEAN Knowledge Network on Forest and Climate Change, Dr. Nur Masripatin,
Members of ARKN-FCC,
Ladies and gentlemen,
Very good morning. It is a great honor for me to opening the meeting and this is the second time
I open the ARKN-FCC meeting. Thank for God to bless this ARKN-FCC meeting in Mercure Hotel
Serpong. We appreciate the participant from AMS that present in this meeting. On behalf of the
Government of Indonesia, we would like to express our appreciation for your participation in ARKNFCC meeting and would like to support the network for ASEAN.
Eventhough you all have busy schedule meetings in your countries, we appreciate your participation
to come and join in this meeting. Your objectives for common positions in ARKN-FCC will be benefit
for ASEAN communities.
In this meeting, we could share the common issues of climate change to obtain the agreement in
our region. We need to maintain and improve, considering the challenges in UNFCCC negotiations.
We all know that next year, UNFCCC will start the legally binding instrument so it is important for
us to make sure whatever the instrument will not be burden for our countries. We have to maintain
the ASEAN position and demands will be considered. With ARKN-FCC, we will make sure the
position and demands has been recognized and addressed to get solid ground for our regional. In
addition, beginning the next year, there is also indicated that most countries need to make sure
the instrument will be benefit. I believe ASEAN have important position in the discussion of the
instrument.
AMS need to solidify the cooperation in forest and climate change issues in regional level and
international level. Through the ARKN-FCC, we could produce the common understanding of our
position and improved outputs. With this I would like to closing my opening remarks and formally
open the 9th Meeting of ASEAN Regional Knowledge Network on Forest and Climate Change.
Thank you very much.
I.B. Putera Parthama, PhD
Director General of FORDA, ASOF Leader of Indonesia
62
LAMPIRAN
ANNEX 3.4
Presentation of Discussion on Possible Elements for ASEAN Joint
Submission on SIS-REDD+
PROCEEDING
63
64
LAMPIRAN
PROCEEDING
65
66
LAMPIRAN
ANNEX 3.5
Presentation of Non-Market Based Approaches Related to REDD+
Implementation: views and examples
PROCEEDING
67
68
LAMPIRAN
PROCEEDING
69
70
LAMPIRAN
PROCEEDING
71
ANNEX 3.6
Presentation of Malaysia Land Sector by Dr. Elizabeth Philip
(Head of Climate Change and Forestry Working Group in Malaysia)
72
LAMPIRAN
PROCEEDING
73
74
LAMPIRAN
PROCEEDING
75
ANNEX 3.7
Presentation of Forest Policy and Programs: Philippines by
Mrs. Mayumi Quintos-Natividad (Assistant Director of Forest
Management Bureau, Department of Environment and Natural
Resources in Philippines)
76
LAMPIRAN
PROCEEDING
77
78
LAMPIRAN
PROCEEDING
79
80
LAMPIRAN
PROCEEDING
81
82
LAMPIRAN
PROCEEDING
83
84
LAMPIRAN
ANNEX 3.8
Presentation of National Policy on Forestry Planning 2011-2030
by Mr. Radian Bagiyono (Head of Climate Change Services, Centre
of Standardization and Environmental, Ministry of Forestry,
Indonesia)
PROCEEDING
85
86
LAMPIRAN
PROCEEDING
87
88
LAMPIRAN
PROCEEDING
89
90
LAMPIRAN
PROCEEDING
91
92
LAMPIRAN
PROCEEDING
93
94
LAMPIRAN
PROCEEDING
95
ANNEX 3.9
Presentation of National Policy and Program in Forestry
and Land Use by Mr. Thuch Phalla (Deputy Chief, Habitats
Management and Nature Based Eco-Tourist Office in Cambodia)
96
LAMPIRAN
PROCEEDING
97
98
LAMPIRAN
PROCEEDING
99
100
LAMPIRAN
PROCEEDING
101
102
LAMPIRAN
PROCEEDING
103
ANNEX 3.10
Presentation of National Policy on Forest, Land Natural Resources
and Environment in Thailand by Dr. Suchitra Changtragoon
(Expert on Forest Conservation Research in Thailand)
104
LAMPIRAN
PROCEEDING
105
106
LAMPIRAN
PROCEEDING
107
108
LAMPIRAN
PROCEEDING
109
110
LAMPIRAN
PROCEEDING
111
112
LAMPIRAN
ANNEX 3.11
THE 9th MEETING OF ASEAN REGIONAL KNOWLEDGE NETWORK ON
FOREST AND CLIMATE CHANGE (ARKN-FCC)
Mercure Serpong Alam Sutera Hotel - INDONESIA
7 8 May 2014
Documentation
Photo Session
Disscusion Session
PROCEEDING
113
Teleconference
Disscusion Session
114
LAMPIRAN

Prosiding ARKN 2014

Hochgeladen von

Dokumentinformationen

Originaltitel

Copyright

Verfügbare Formate

Dieses Dokument teilen

Dokument teilen oder einbetten

Freigabeoptionen

Stufen Sie dieses Dokument als nützlich ein?

Sind diese Inhalte unangemessen?

Copyright:

Verfügbare Formate

Prosiding ARKN 2014

Hochgeladen von

Copyright:

Verfügbare Formate

Proceeding

Centre for Standardization and Environment

Centre for Standardization and Environment

2.2. MEETING AND DISCUSSION

2.2.2. Issue Relating to Non-Carbon Benefits (NCBs)

2.2.3. Issue Relating to Non-Market based Approaches (NMA) and Joint

2.2.4. Review of the Work Programme of ARKN- FCC 2013-2015

2.2.6. Review on the Output Documents of the Project on Strengthening

3.2. PRESENTATION AND DISCUSSION

3.2.2. Issue Relating to Safeguards Information System (SIS)-REDD+

3.2.3. Non-Market Based Approaches (NMBA) Related to REDD+

3.2.4. Issue Relating to National Policy and Programme in Forestry and

3.2.5. Presentation and Discussion on National Policy and Program in

2) Forest Policy and Programs in Philippines (Mrs. Mayumi QuintosNatividad)

3) National Policy on Forestry Planning 2011-2030 (Mr. Radian Bagiyono)

4) National Policy and Program in Forestry and Land Use in Cambodia

5) National Policy on Forest, Land Natural Resources and Environment in

6) Issues Relating to Land Sector and Forest in Myanmar (Dr. Myat Su

3.3. OTHER ISSUE /WORK PROGRAMME OF ARKN- FCC 2014

Day 1 - TUESDAY, 4 MARCH 2014

Adoption of the meeting agenda

Discussion to prepare draft joint submission

Discussion to prepare draft joint submission

Day 2 - WEDNESDAY, 5 MARCH 2014

Discussion to prepare draft joint submission

ARKN-FCC Work Programme 2013-2015

2. Discussion on the review of output documents of the Project on

Field visit West Bali National Park

BALI INDONESIA, 4-6 MARCH 2014

Mr. Thuch Phalla

Mr. Yek Sokla

Block VII 8th floor

Block VII 8th floor

Block VII 4h floor

Tel : +603 8886

Mr. Sein Htoon

Level 12, Wisma

Tel : +603 8886

Dr. Pham Quoc

Tel: 662 5610777

Dr. Nat. Techn.

No 2 Ngoc HaBa Dinh Ha Noi,

b. OPENING REMARKS BY GAP CC RERESENTATIVE

can be understood conceptually but is methodologically and operationally complex.

II. Paragraph 24 (Non-carbon Benefits/NCBs)

The importance of non-carbon benefits (NCBs) in the implementation of REDD+ has

could, as an option, select types of NCBs from a broad range of ecosystem

methodology or develop appropriate methodology for

should enhance research cooperation to support the development of methodology

3. Policy Dialogue on Forest and

2. Explore and Analyze Financial

1. Develop decision making tool

ASEAN REGIONAL KNOWLEDGE NETWORK ON FOREST AND CLIMATE CHANGE (ARKN-FCC)

1. Measurement and Monitoring :

4. Web portal on lesson learnt

3. Policy Exchanges on Carbon

AMS, supported by GAPCC and GoI

ASEC & ARKN-FCC Secretariat (note

LEAF (confirmed support)

Focal Point: Dr. Nur Masripatin

the region shares in common in terms of cultural values, biodiversity richness,

In this first step, a thorough assessment of all

Step 1.1 - Assess current rates of