Homepage

About Us
Goals

About Us!

News

Background

Educate!

Video
Dr. Rath

Inform!

Science

Newsletter

Wiki-Rath

Contact Us!

Library

Links

Features

Sitemap

Your Country

Dr. Niedzwiecki

European Union: The End Game

Translation of an article by Leonidas Aposkitis published in the Hellenic Nexus magazine in
May 2014.
When, on 26th March, 10 days after the referendum in Crimea which determined its union
with Russia, the US president visited Brussels for the first time, he urgently asked for the
integration of the European Union, encouraging the Europeans at the same time to support
NATO against Moscow. Obama emphasized from the start that on the day after the Second
World War, from both sides of the Atlantic we adopted a common vision for Europeand
with a determination that states can satisfy the interests of their own civilians through
commerce and open markets This is not the first time that American officials confessed
that a united European continent is the best associate for the USA, overlooking the fact
that organizations we know today as European institutions were designed and created
through antidemocratic procedures. At the same time, the European Union is the biggest
globalization and open market experiment in existence, founded upon lies and incomplete
truths. Its lack of legitimacy though has started to show through and is now visible to the
citizens of Europe.

Page Tools:
Print This Page!
Inform A Friend!
Bookmark This Page!
Contact
Like

174

Tweet

12

What's New:
World Cancer Day 2015:
Millions of Patients Dying
for the Truth
Should malnourished
children be given
antibiotics or nutrients?
70th Anniversary of the
Liberation of Auschwitz:
The lessons of history
have yet to be learned
Cancer is not just pure
bad luck
Government surveillance
and our right to
freedom of speech
The Barletta Declaration:
Making Natural
Preventive Health a
Human Right

Barroso, Obama and Rompuy during their meeting at the EU-US Summit on 26 March, 2014. The dead ends of European
unification after the financial crisis and the rise of euroskepticism are about to shake the position of the US as the
sole global superpower.

For the same reason, the euro-elections that are coming up on May 25th even though they
are nothing more than a masquerade that aims to deceptively present the EU as a democratic
institution show this will turn into a boomerang for the Eurocrats, who are aiming to
complete their coup through the federalization of the EU.

The Nazi roots of the European Union

During the Nuremberg War Crimes Trial, 28 administrators of the IG Farben Chemical Cartel
were tried for crimes against humanity and many of them ended up being sentenced. The
American prosecutor, summarizing the decisive role of the chemical cartel, stated that:
without IG Farben the Second World War would never have been possible! After the initiation
of the Cold War some of the general administrators of IG Farben who were tried at Nuremberg
returned to the highest positions in West German industry. One of them was Hans Globke, who
was in charge of writing the Laws of the European Reich in the Nazi occupied countries during
the Second World War.
Globke became a minister in the West German Chancellery under Konrad Adenauer, one of the
architects of the EU, and controlled essentially all areas of political life in postwar West
Germany, from the Secret Services to the continuation of the petrochemical and drug cartel in
conquering Europe through the newly formed EU.
Walter Hallstein, a prominent professor of Law during the Nazi regime, in charge of
formulating the law of Protection of German Blood and Honor in 1939, became the
principal architect of the EU in 1957 and the first president of the European Board now
known as the EU Commission, the executive body of the EU.
The truth that is knowingly hidden from the people of Europe is that the European Union is
based on the Nazi plans as published in Berlin in 1941 by Amo Solter, who was in charge of the
official Nazi Central Research Institute for National Economic Order and Greater Sphere
Economy.
The Second World War never actually finished. It just changed its strategy. Losing the war
didnt derail the European plans of the Nazis, it just turned the war into a financial one and
led eventually to the creation of the European Union. The pharmaceutical empire is one of the
main powers behind the European Union. The drug companies are not only involved in the
control of the medical cartel but are also political designers.
On 26th February 2008, in a public discussion in the British Parliament, Rodney Atkinson a
former British government advisor, writer and a lecturer at Mainz University in Germany
spoke on the fascist nature of the European Union. Atkinson described in detail the history of
an unspoken truth: The EU was established and initially led by former Nazis and fascists, and
that is why the Charlemagne Prize was awarded to Tony Blair, Edward Heath, Roy Jenkins and
others for their role in depriving democratic dominance from Europes state-members. The
EU today has reproduced the politics and structures of 1940s Europe and is demonstrating all
the characteristics of an authoritarian, antidemocratic Europe serving the interests of private
firms just as its fascist creators intended.
Isnt it strange, states Atkinson, that The EU has promoted the ethnic cleansing of 1 million
people in the Balkans, mainly Serbs, Jews and gypsies, from Croatia, Bosnia and Kosovo which
all provided Waffen SS divisions for the Nazis in the 1940s?
Those who aspired to the destruction of democratic control knew that they would not be able
to succeed if they attempted their political coup within a democratic system. They therefore
acted beneath the democratic system and on the edge of national borders. They established
within the European Union the creation of a bureaucratic state so monolithic that many people
are numbed by the size of this project.
Given that until recently their secret goal of transforming the democratic state members of
Europe into a gigantic neo-libertarian empire was on the horizon, the new dictators are
feeling emboldened. By blocking referendums for 95% of the citizens of the EU, they have
refused them the right to vote for the mass loss of their democratic rights through the Lisbon
Treaty. Yet it is outrageous when, based on measurements of public opinion according to the
Eurobarometer surveys, only 50% of the citizens of the EU support it today and, while they are

citizens of the EUs member states, they could be arrested and prosecuted in another country
without substantial data on any crime, their abduction to a court, or habeas corpus.

Imposing the Brussels Dictatorship

One of the central goals of the Cartel during the 30s and 40s was to turn Europe into an
authoritarian society and eliminate every kind of opposition to the Nazi regime, imposing the
mass monitoring of the population.
In the Brussels EU today, contemporary 21st century technologies have made the monitoring
and recording of civilians communications within a European state an easy task through
mobile phones, emails and the internet, and the more commonly used high technology
monitors.
Now, within the pretext of combating terrorism, the EU has published a directive which
transforms Europe into an Orwellian state. The Data Retention Directive, passed in 2006,
obliges all Brussels EU state members to ensure that telecommunications companies who
provide internet services as well as other communication services save and maintain all
communications data for a minimum of 6 months to 2 years.
And as if this wasnt enough, at the beginning of 2010 it was revealed that enormous
quantities of sensitive personal data on European civilians are maintained in a gigantic
European computer network to which over 500,000 terminals have access. The system holds a
great quantity of personal data including names, dates and places of birth, nationalities,
natural characteristics and other details of civilians that are under discreet monitoring.
The Brussels EU spends millions of euros on the development of Orwellian electronic
technologies that are designed for processing CCTV images and searching the internet for
irregular behavior. Under a program known as Project Indect, computer software is being
developed that will register and process information from websites, discussion forums, server
data, networks, and even individual computers. The information collected by Project Indect
can be used by the European Joint Situation Center (SitCen), a relatively unknown body,
considered by many to be the beginnings of a Brussels EU secret service. SitCen, a department
of the so-called European External Action Service headed by Foreign Affairs Minister and
Vice President of EU Commission, Catherine Ashton, is well known to have a cell of secret
service agents seconded from European capitals. And in a scenario that sounds very much like
the world predicted in the classic novel 1984, a secret monitoring system that uses hidden
microphones to record public conversations is now in effect in many European cities.
In June 2010, documents concerning a mass monitoring program of the EU designed to collect
information on people and groups actively opposed to the directing of the EU by multinational
interests and who are considered to be promoting radical messages was exposed. The
documents were revealed by Statewatch, a group based in London which defends social
freedoms. According to Statewatch, the targets include people who are active in antiglobalization or nationalistic groups.
A revealing press release towards the end of 2009 published by Giesecke & Devrient, a
technology company based in Monaco, proposed imposing a system of biometric cataloguing
and identification on EU citizens. Outlining an experimental European plan, the press release
summarizes the goal as being the introduction of an electronic ID card in chip card format
valid throughout the entire EU. Reading between the lines, the ultimate objective seems to
be for European citizens to be required to use it for everything from registering a change of
address through to accessing their bank and insurance services.

The European Imperialistic War Machine

While we were focusing on the Ukraine crisis, the EU attempted to bribe 16 West African
governments to sign a colonial agreement that will plunder Africa even further and make the
average African even poorer. Over 40 African puppet presidents met with EU officials in
Brussels at the beginning of April even though the African Union (AU) discouraged its member
states from attending the conference.
The Eurocrats in Brussels do not recognize the AU and they are only interested in forcing the

Africans to act against their interests, allowing multinational corporations to plunder their
countries, in return for certain gifts. Most of the African presidents are complying, fearful that
they would otherwise become victims of a coup.
Pro-EU propaganda claims that it will open up the European market to 100% of African
products; in reality however Africa essentially cannot produce manufactured products, as
Western neo-imperialistic policies prevented the continents development. Instead Africa
exports raw materials, which it has no trouble selling anywhere. In return, in the next 20
years, 16 African countries will open up 75% of their market of 300 million consumers to
European multinational corporations, destroying in this way their local producers along with
the dream for an industrialized Africa and any autonomous economic infrastructure. And this is
no different to what they did to our own [Greek] agriculture and industry.
In order to persuade the African puppet politicians, Eurocrats have sponsored around 6
billion euros worth of corrupted kickbacks (which they also call help) for the local high
officials, so that they can buy new villas and cars etc. (See www.siliconafrica.com,
01/04/2014).

The Eurasian Chess Board and the American Strategy

Just as Brzezinski had foreseen, Americas global leadership depends on how long and how
effective its superiority in the Eurasian continent can be sustained (The Great Chessboard,
Livani Publications, Athens, 1998, p.63). A simple look at the map, says Brzezinski, suggests
that control of Eurasia means: a) control of two of the three most economically powerful and
productive regions of the world, b) submission of Africa and marginalization of the western
hemisphere and Oceania, c) control of the biggest part of the natural wealth in the world,
which is present there both in its businesses and under its soils. Eurasia represents 75% of the
global population and 60% of global GDP. Eurasia also includes 6 of the biggest economies of
the world after the USA, as well as all the nations with nuclear arsenals except one.
On this huge geographical chess board, stretching from Lisbon to Vladivostok, the modern Big
Game takes place one that will determine whether Washington shall remain the dominant
superpower or whether it will lose its global influence. Brzezinski recognises 5 main
geostrategic players (nations with influence beyond their borders), these are: France,
Germany, Russia, China and India; and 5 critical, geopolitical axes, nations whose importance
arises from their delicate position, with the first being Ukraine, without which Russia stops
being a Eurasian empire. The rest of the geopolitical axes are: Turkey, Iran, Azerbaijan and
South Korea.
Under these circumstances Americas favourite setup for Europe is the European Union, as a
substantial geopolitical bridgehead of the United States on the Eurasian continent. That is why
globalists like Brzezinski and Soros etc. say that the downfall of Europes interior viability
undermines the effort towards its unification. In other words, they blame Europeans for not
accepting the purpose of the European case, the way it is promoted by the unpopular, and
distant from European public opinion, bureaucratic mechanism initially created by the EEC and
amplified by the EU. And who is to blame? The overwhelmingly unbearable system of social
providence which undermines economic viability. (Brzezinski p. 111).
Their confessed purpose from the beginning was the dismantlement of the social nation. Now,
with the Soviet threat out of the way, Europeans must adjust to globalised slavery. Under
the pretext of the economic crisis, the Troika and the alleged reforms, European unification is
becoming a compulsory, ordered process.
The European States must be abolished because they favour protectionism and localism and
cannot manage their new problems like immigration. This is what the globalists stand for, who
believe its urgent that an expanded continental and federal framework is applied. And if the
EU adopts the federal system, the USA asks that 1 voice and 1 vote is imposed for the whole of
Europe at the UN. Otherwise it is threatening to ask for the right of each individual state of
the 50 American states to have a vote at the general assembly.
European citizens do not know the whole story. From the first moment, the treaty of Nice was
an attempt to establish a political Europe with its own government. And the EU didnt tell that

to its citizens. The media presented the treaty as necessary, there was no informative political
debate regarding how the treaty reduced the sovereignty and independence of the member
states.
At a poll produced for the EU, only 28% of Europeans citizens have heard of this European
treaty or knew of its aim for the creation of a constitution for the entire Europe.

Brussels, the wounded heart of the Beast

The situation in Ukraine is changing into a historical loss for the New World Order conspiracy.
This is becoming obvious on many levels. The continuing mass attack on their petrodollars is
even more disturbing for the bank dynasties that control the FED [United States Federal
Reserve].
China insists that the UN must move its central offices to Asia to reform the Security Council,
in order to represent the population of the earth more effectively. It is also getting ready to
create another organization which will have a higher budget than the IMF and the World Bank
combined.
Experiencing the crisis in Eurasia, Greece has no reason to go along with the European-Atlantic
interests. A new doctrine of foreign policy is needed to give flexibility to options and serve our
national interests. The advantage of the Greek geopolitical field to being the meeting point of
various cultures starts to work against us when decisions are taken in absentia of the people by
a venal group of politicians like the current one. It is now urgent to overturn the current status
quo, punish the traitors and increase the participation of citizens in decision taking. Now the
euro-fanatics can see the next step: a federal state of 500 million people, following the model
of the USA. Euro-skepticism is rising in front of them, spreading across a spectrum between
preserving national control and the final collapse of the EU. But the EU consciously disparages
the voices of euro-skepticism, portraying them thoughtlessly as racist/xenophobic voices in
order to take advantage of the sensitive reactions of the people.
However, the rise of euro-skepticism and nationalism in all European countries, which will be
recorded in the elections on 25th of May, will force the decision centers of the EU to speed up
the federalization procedures, increasing centrifugal tendencies in the Eurozone. Europe, as
we know it, will not endure for long: it will either change into a centralist super-state without
the support of its people, or collapse. We are in front of the End Game, as it is whispered in
the halls of Brussels, and we might again experience a European disintegration, something
which is not the best outcome for America.
The most probable result will be that central Europe will stop being a European area and
change to become a place with an evident prevalence of German nationalism.
On the other hand, Russian geopolitical aspirations for Eurasia and Central Europe will be
triggered. This is also Americas nightmare, where the Europe of Yalta will again become the
Europe of Versailles. And if we accept Brzezinskis estimations that, in order to form this kind
of Europe geopolitically, an expansion of NATO to the east is crucial then the failure to
integrate Ukraine risks the whole EuroAtlantic project. If Russia manages to maintain control
of Ukraine it will seek to become the leader of a strong EuroAsiatic empire, having a dominant
position in the Black Sea.
The last run of events supports the ambitions of Moscow and the influence of the EuroAsiatic
theoretical school of Russian strategists, such as Aleksandr Dugin, who suggest the
establishment of an anti-American coalition and the opposition to unipolar globalization and
the ideology of postmodernism.
The impasse of European integration after the economic crisis and the failure of the social
institutions of Europe, the Russian coalition with both China and Iran via BRICS and the
opposition of Moscow for the integration of Ukraine in the EuroAtlantic framework, will be the
geostrategic turning points that will determine the attempt of America to assert itself as the
first, the only and the last real worldwide superpower. We are in an instable period of mental
collapses and sociopolitical tensions, which upsets the conditions for preserving peace the way
we have known it for the last 3 decades.

Sources
1. Paul Anthony Taylor, Aleksandra Niedzwiecki, Matthias Rath and August
Kowalczyk, The Nazi Roots of the Brussels EU, 2010, Dr. Rath Health
Foundation.
2. Christopher Booker, Richard North, The Great Deception: The Secret History of
the European Union.

Like 174 people like this. Sign Up to see what your friends like.

2015 by Dr. Rath Health Foundation

About Us!

Contact Us!

Print This Page!

Inform A Friend!

Bookmark This Page!

The Health Organization Founded by Dr. Rath is Unique in the World: All the Profits it Makes Go to a Non-profit Foundation. Read More.