Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
A Voice of
Creative Farmers, Artisans, Pastoralists
and Other Grassroots Innovators
Contents
Cover Story
Eye of the Bird: Is Specialization Possible without Reduction? ............................ 3
Editorial
In Defense of Optimal Reductionism!: Science, Sustainability and Society......... 4
Puka suytu versus Solanum tuberosum: How Scientific are the Scientific
Names? ..................................................................................................................... 6
Debate
Patents on Neem-III: Losers, Gainers and Onlookers ........................................... 7
Honey Bee Humssss....
Coconut, Calving and Conserving Seeds: Hittala Gida ....................................... 10
Transgenic Marriage, Cough Balls and Organic Jaggery:
Nam Vazhi Velanmai ............................................................................................. 11
Bahupushpikaran: How to Stimulate Profuse Flowering .................................... 12
Indigenous Use of Modern Technology: Sonar Traps for Fishes ........................ 13
Innovations
Survey of Innovations : Part XV .............................................................................. 14
Stemming Erosion of knowledge: A Case of Horse Husbandry .......................... 17
Ecopreneurship
Making Nature your Guru! ...................................................................................... 18
Adding Value to Indigenous Knowledge: The Case of Fermented Milk ............ 20
Book Worm ................................................................................................................ 21
Natural Pest and disease Control, Sacred and Protected Groves of Andhra
Pradesh, Global Pesticide Campaigner
News & Views ............................................................................................................ 22
Sodh Sankal: A club for experimentors, Teachers as change-agent: Quality
education for all, FAO seeks advice of the younge generation and more...
Dialogue...................................................................................................................... 23
Letters from members of Honey Bee network
Subscription information available at the end.
Cover Story
Eye of the Bird: Is Specialization Possible without Reduction?
In ancient India, there was a famous Guru (teacher) called Dronacharya. He taught princes
and kings the art of archery at his ashram, a school situated deep in the forests. The five
sons of King Pandu were his choicest students. One day, he decided to test the skills
of the five brothers. He hung a model of a bird on a branch and asked each of them,
one by one, to take aim at the bird and tell him what they saw. The eldest brother, Yudhishtar, said
that he saw the entire cosmos of which the earth was a part, then a tree which was a part of the
earth, and finally a bird hung on the branch of the tree. Dronacharya asked him to sit down. The next
brother saw the earth, tree, branch and the bird. The Guru told him to sit down. Then came the turn
of Dronacharyas favourite student Arjun, the hero of the Bhagwad Gita, a part of the ancient epic
poem, Mahabharat. Arjun could see only the eye of the bird, and nothing but the eye. He became
the best archer of his time, surpassed only by the tribal, Ekalavya, who was not admitted by Dronacharya
to the ashram since he was a commoner.
Seeing just the eye of the bird reflects an extreme reductionist attitude just as seeing the whole
cosmos shows a holistic perspective. We need both perspectives, the reductionist as well as holistic,
and not just the holistic one, as many environmentalists claim. Any theory building requires drawing
boundaries in order to reduce the phenomena being studied. On the other hand, we need a holistic
view so that the inter-connections between the different parts of nature can be seen. Sustainability
requires balancing these two ends of the spectrum.
A Sufi Tale
O Mountain! High and
mighty reaching into the skies
How you seem absorbed in
self regarding.
To dance on a flowerhead,
while your feet are in chains
Proposed logo
for SRISTI.
Comments are
welcome!
Source: Quatrains (Persian) Baghdad: AlMaarif Prer 1975: 52/3, in Idris Shah,
1978,
Learning
How
to
Learn,
London: Penguin Books.
Printed, Published and Owned by Kirit K Patel on behalf of SRISTI Innovations, B/2, Srikrishna
Apartments, Near Lad Society, Vastrapur, Ahmedabad-380 015. Printed at M/s Bhargavi Printers,
Ahmedabad. Editor: Anil K Gupta.
Editor
Editorial
Anil K Gupta
Associate Editors
Kirit K Patel
Astad R Pastakia
Srinivas Chokkakula
Editorial Team
Sumati K Sampemane
Vijaya Sherry Chand
Jitendra Suthar
Shailesh Shukla
Jyoti Capoor
Jayvir Anjaria
Riya Sinha
Niraj Joshi
Assistance
Ramesh Patel
Hema Patel
Alka Raval
S Murali Krishna
A S Reddy
Graphics & Design
D T Padekar
Krina Patel
Palash Graphics
Scan Point
Other Sources of Illustrations
Loksanskruti Ma Pashuo
Layout
Unnikrishnan
Rajesh Patel
Secretarial
Assistance
R Baskaran
Balaganapathy Mudaliar
Jivabhai Kotiya
Editorial Address
Honey Bee
C/o Prof Anil K Gupta
Indian Institute of Management
Vastrapur
Ahmedabad 380 015
India
Tel : 91-79-407241
91-79-6564979 (R)
Fax : 91-79-6427896
Telex : 121-6351 IIMA IN
Gram : INDINMAN
Email : honeybee@iimahd.ernet.in
anilg@iimahd.ernet.in
Home Page: http://csf.colorado.edu/sristi/
http://www.iimahd.ernet.in/~anilg/sristi/
sristi.htm
Web Page Design and Maintainance by How do we balance the reductionist approach with Holism? The cover story
Abhas Abhinav, Cerulean International. shows that specialization is not possible without reduction. Every society has
Honey Bee PDF version design by produced specialists of various kinds at all times in history. We would not witness
Abhas Abhinav, Cerulean International. the Taj Mahal, Ashoka Pillar or location specific agricultural implements etc.,
Honey Bee Vol 7(1) January-March, 1996
A Regret:
We regret that we are not as regular as we should be in publishing Honey
Bee. This issue is reaching you very late. But let me assure you that by the
end of this year, we will be regular. Please keep sending your contributions
on various aspects of creativity and innovations at the grassroots. I look forward
to seeing some of you at the forthcoming International conference on the
subject next January.
Anil K Gupta
Honey Bee
Conference on Creativity:
Readers may recall the earlier
announcement about the International
Conference on Creativity and
Innovation at Grassroots for
Sustainable Natural Resource
Management being organized at IIMAhmedabad, January 11-14, 1997.
We have accepted more than 140
abstracts of which about 47 are from
abroad. Session on heuristics of
innovator, native American knowledge
systems, tree and forest based
innovations, combining sacred with
secular institutions and farmers
innovations etc., are among the very
well represented themes. Last date
for receiving abstracts has been
extended till August 31, 1996. Even
if you receive this issue late, please
write to us at editorial address.
Hello!,
I am Puka
suytu
I am
Solanum
tuberosum
How is the peasant affected by the fact that the potato is named Solanum
tuberosum by the scientific community? Grimaldo Vasquez of Lima, explains
why it makes a world of a difference to the farming community. This article
was communicated to us by Jorge Ishizawa of PRATEC, Jr. Horacio Urteaga
1818, Lima, 11, PERU, Telefax: 51-1-4639545. It is dedicated to the memory
of Eduardo Grillo.
Honey Bee
David: Your statement that every farmer in any part of the world being free to use neem
in whichever way s/he wants, needs clarification. Technically, farmers are not any longer
free to use neem absolutely in any way they want, in that they cannot produce and market
the patented product which is derived from neem. Patents do not in any way restrict the
farmers rights to use neem in traditional ways, or to develop or produce products or
processes using neem that are different from the patented products or processes.
How free
are farmers
to use neem?
Anil: You are right about the restriction on farmers use of patented process. However, there
is another side to this restriction. Normally, any company holding a patent will file infringement
suit only against someone from whom the company can claim damages. No company will
gain anything by filing such a suit against a small farmer. The cost of filing suit will be much
more than any damage that could be recovered. Though, I do feel if the process is such that
small farmers can use it at their farm, they should have the freedom to do so - a kind of
farmers' exemption.
David: Is the application of neem derivatives known for certain to be environmentally sound?
Or, can we only say that it is less environmentally unsound than chemical pesticides, and if
applied properly is unlikely to have adverse impacts? (Do we know how to define proper
application?)
Insects can't
develop
resistance to
neem products
easily
Anil: BOSTID study on Neem (Washington: National Academy Press, 1992:5-8) observed:
"Whatever the mixture or formulation, neem-based products display several remarkable
qualities. For example, although pests can become tolerant to single toxic chemical such as
malathion, it seems unlikely that they can develop genetic resistance to neems complex blend
of compounds-many functioning quite differently and on different parts of an insects life cycle
and physiology. Certainly they wont do so quickly. Several experiments have failed to detect
any signs of incipient resistance to mixture. For example, even after being exposed to neem
for 35 successive generations, diamondback moths remained as susceptible as they had been
in the beginning".
David: In general, it is rarely safe to say that a biological resource is bound to be inexhaustible.
Thus, I would caution against statements which conclude that commercial collection of neem
seeds cannot possibly harm neem trees. Are there other threats to neem trees that could
combine with seed collection to intensify the impact? Do we need to give farmers incentives to
plant and maintain neem trees, to ensure that over collection (combined with other threats)
does not harm their reproduction?
David is a
Senior Attorney at
Centre for International
Environmental Law,
1621 Connecticut Ave.
NW Suite 200,
Washington DC 20009,
USA
How safe
is it?
Will increase
in demand not
increase
supply?
Anil: As I have explained in the previous article on Neem (HB Vol 6(3):6 & 6(4):6), due to
low dormancy, seeds can not be stored easily for long time without damage. Soon after the
rains, these will germinate and die out. There is practically no risk of neem being over exploited
due to collection of seeds or leaves because it is easy to grow and that too on degraded lands
or light dry soils. Market incentives in the form of good prices for neem seeds and other products
should be useful incentives besides availability of good seeds as well as access of poor to the
lands. For conservation of diversity of germ plasm and knowledge of people, an international
fund (contributed by the national and international users of neem knowledge) for research in
value addition, in situ and ex situ conservation, biotechnological propagation of candidate plants,
etc., is certainly called for.
Honey Bee
Vol 7(1)
January-March, 1996
David: Some argue that Grace doesnt deserve the patents because they are for merely
trivial improvements on traditional methods. Perhaps one response is, if the improvement is
trivial, then Grace gains nothing and others lose nothing from Grace having the exclusive
right to use the improvement. Thus, farmers are not harmed by such patents. If, on the other
hand, Graces innovation is not trivial, then they should gain some protection for their investment
in an innovation for the same reason that informal innovators deserve protection for their
creativity.
New
knowledge
needs
protection
Trivialising
patent or
patenting
trivia!
Anil: Basic objections are two fold: one, the protection sought is too wide i.e. for a large
number of solvents, two, many of these solvents have been tried by others in the past.
Hence, both novelty and broadness are being questioned. My own view is that innovation by
the company which does add new knowledge should receive protection in so far as that
company also agrees to share part of the profits with the proposed international fund. After
all, they did not stumble upon this knowledge by chance or entirely through their own effort.
Protection of IPRs of the corporation has to go hand in hand with that of the peasants.
David: You state that any synthetic analogue of a natural product is patentable because it
does not exist in nature in that form. If, by analogue, you mean an identical compound, then
I am not sure that the proposition is correct. A purified form of a natural compound can be
patented, whether the compounds structure itself results from natural or artificial processes.
A process for synthesizing a naturally occurring compound can be patented. But the compound
itself, in a general sense, cannot be patented if it occurs in nature. Isnt that right?
Can synthetic
analogues
be patented?
Rajendra
Jansatta, 11 Oct. 1991
Mr. President,
there is a person called Columbus,
standing outside. He claims that since
he had discovered America, it belongs
to him!
Anil: Government must make the popularization of herbal pesticides an integral part of future
agricultural growth policy. There already exists a fast track for registration of neem based
pesticides but the subsidies on chemical pesticides continue, just as many pesticides banned
in the west continue to be marketed in India. The existing laws are proving to be the major
barrier in the development of eco-friendly herbal pesticides. Indiara a non-toxic herbal pesticide
developed by Mr. Sukhatme in Pune about ten years ago has been successfully tried in many
countries, but was not registered by the Indian government for reasons best known to itself.
The policy bias in favour of chemical pesticides does need to be tempered.
What is
prior art?
Pesticides
banned in west
are still sold in
developing countries
Vol 7(1)
January-March, 1996
would void the patent; and (2) since one cannot patent agricultural or pharmaceutical
inventions (neem relates to both fields!) in India, as in many underdeveloped countries, it
is likely that anyone who invented such techniques for neem preservation would just keep
them secret. (Why publish a commercially valuable idea that cannot be patented? perhaps
to inform other users - farmers etc.- but would this be done on paper or by word of mouth?
Would publication ever occur in a journal that reached the US, as it must to constitute prior
art?) As regards the printed publication issue in US patent law, I should just add that
whatever rules there are on paper concerning this subject, American courts have often
found ways to disregard printed sources which judges have found too obscure to qualify
as prior art. But again, I dont really make any claims about whether petitioners claims
are factually true or not. However, the typical patent receives only about 10-12 hours of
examination, which is hardly enough time to go digging into university libraries to try to find
articles in less well-known foreign agricultural or scientific journals. The thinking is that the
really valuable patents will end up in litigation, and all the facts about possibly invalidating
prior art will come out in detail then.
Are patents
not adaptable
to the ethics
and excellence
of peasants?
While my contentions are limited to the idea that the US exclusion of some foreign prior
art - specifically prior use, knowledge or invention, which are valid prior art if they occur
within US borders -is sort of irrational in todays world, and leads to messy situations, I
dont really make the claim in this paper that, under current US law, the Grace patent is
invalid. Certainly, if the FET contentions about the idea being in US printed publications are
true, then the patent may very well fall on reexaminationin fact, most patents issued from
the PTO fail when subjected to closer inspection. This aside, though, I must say that as
a former chemist I find the patent discloses the simplest of inventions, and though it might
not be obvious in light of US-admissible prior art, might fail as obvious to try under
the stricter European standards applying that doctrine. It is true that commercialization in
India might not suffer from a lack of patentability there. However, the US promises to be
the largest market for neem based pesticides, because of the environmental cache of the
product (all-natural/ biodegradable/ clean-kill (eg. not an instant kill like pyrethrins which
leave insect corpses around ones lovely garden)), and its current expense. If access to this
market is limited to one company, Grace, the resulting monopoly will not benefit those
trying to sell neem seed.
Anil: The doctrine of prior art does deserve to be modified as should many other provisions
of modern patent law. I was told by Chris Blanch of Franklin Pierce Law Centre some
years ago that a particular patent was upheld when questioned on grounds of availability
of a thesis in a library because the thesis in question had not been cataloged. Thus, it was
not considered reasonably accessible. My contention is that if we follow the same principle,
then much of the traditional knowledge is patentable in US and elsewhere because it is not
reasonably accessible to any outsider. As evident in the case of the patent on the
application of turmeric powder for healing of wounds, the limits of credulity have been
surpassed. In the meanwhile CSIR (Council of Scientific and Industrial Research, India) has
filed objection to this patent. Surely, such disputes clearly demonstrate the need for greater
transparency on the subject of the precise espousal of rights that knowledge of people
bestow on local communities and individuals. Turmeric has been used for centuries for its
healing properties and the library of any pharmacy college will have dozens of references
on the subject. The efforts of this kind could have four implications: i) Governments in
developing countries may attach urgency to patent bill reforms so that they can take
corrective steps. ii) they could take this issue up in WTO as a dispute. The issue also needs
to be raised at third COP of CBD. iii) reject the application if patentee of such patents were
to ever seek recognition under Indian patent laws. iv) campaign for explicit position under
TRIPs on the patentability of traditional knowledge in public domain. However,the
developing countries have more to lose by blanket ban on such a rich source of knowledge
of people. Instead, we should plead for a global registration system for innovations and at
the same time insist on redefining what may constitute prior art as argued by Shayana.
Honey Bee
Vol 7(1)
Shayana
is a chemist
and also an expert in
patent laws.
He can be
contacted at
77 Sejon Drive,
Sayville, NY 11782,
USA.
Anil can be
contacted at
Editorial Address
January-March, 1996
Honey
Bee
The following three pages carry practices published in various local language
versions of Honey Bee. This is in line with Honey Bees goal of generating a platform
for promoting exchange of knowledge across languages and cultures.
.
5 Treating Prolapse
Honey Bee
10
Lantana camara
Following practices are reproduced from Nam Vazhi Velanmai - Tamil version
of Honey Bee. For further details please contact Mr P Vivekanandan, Editor
Nam Vazhi Velanmai.
1 Seed Treatment
Before sowing, seeds of cereals and
pulses are immersed in water mixed with
cattle urine and powder of Acorus
calamus. The seeds which are floating
on the surface are thrown out since it
indicates poor quality. Dried healthy seeds
are used for sowing in drylands. It is
believed that this treatment develops
drought resistance in the plants. This
practice is noticed in some villages
adjoining Dindigul in Tamil Nadu.
Comm: Dr S Ramasamy, Madras Fertilizers
Ltd, Tamil Nadu
3 Storing Hay
5 Jaggery Making
At the time of crushing sugar cane, we
also put five or six desi bhendi
(Hibiscus spp) plants into crusher for
Honey Bee
Vol 7(1)
6 Snake Bite
Leaves of adithinapalain Aristolochia
bracteolata are pounded and mixed with
equal quality of fresh butter. It is given
to the animal who becomes victim of
snake bite or other poisonous creatures
to reduce the poisonous effect.
7 Cough and Asthma of Animals
Fruits of kallathikai (Ficus tinctoria)
seeragam (Cuminum cyminum) and
garlic are pounded together and made
into small balls. These are administered
to the animals in the morning for three
days to relieve cough and asthma
diseases.
January-March, 1996
11
Bahupushpikaran:
How to Stimulate Profuse Flowering
Vallabhbhai Gothi
Mr Vallabhbhai Gothi (203, Mafer Apartment, Saru Section Road, Jamnagar361008) and Dr Girdharbhai Atara (Professor at Ayurveda College, Jamnagar)
have been pursuing research on the practices mentioned in Vrikshayurveda (an
ancient Indian script), on the fields of followers of Swadhyay Parivar. The Swadhyay
movement is a socio religious movement mainly in Western India. This article is
translated from Lok-Sarvani (Vol. 1(1): 4), Gujarati version of Honey Bee.
Lok-Sarvani Improves
Farmers Yield Sustainably
We have just received a letter from
Mr. Manilal C. Chavda, a farmer of
Trasand village in Dholka, Ahmedabad
district, Gujarat. After reading about
the growth stimulating properties of
buttermilk in Lok-Sarvani, he decided
to test the idea on his farm with
extremely satisfying results. Excerpts
from his letter follow.
I am a marginal farmer owning 6.5
'vighas' (1.5 ha.) of land. Last year I
cultivated about two vighas of castor.
As per the information given in your
journal I sprayed about two liters of
buttermilk at the flowering stage in one
vigha of the crop. The plot in which
I had sprayed buttermilk yielded about
50 `maunds (1000 kg) of castor while
the untreated plot yielded only 400 kg.
I had also cultivated fenugreek crop in
one 'vigha' of land. In this crop I
sprayed buttermilk twice at the time of
flowering at an interval of twenty days.
I got a yield of 220 kg as compared to
the neighbours who got only 180 kg
from three 'vighas' of land.
I also used this growth stimulant on
two 'vighas' of wheat with very good
results. I got a yield of 60 `maunds
(1200 kg) from those two vighas.
Making Mango Tree Bloom
Approximately 100 g leaves of each
Ficus religiosa, Ficus benghalensis,
Ficus hispida, Glycyrrhiza glabra are
boiled in mixture of 1 litre of Milk and 8
litre of water till the volume of the entire
mixture get reduced to 1 litre. This liquid
is applied 4 times as soil manure to the
Mango tree at the interval of 10 days.
Control
Honey Bee
12
G. O. Chukwu
Yam is an important carbohydrate staple food in subSaharan Africa. Nigeria supplies about seventy per cent
of the worlds yam. Ethnocentric attachments to yam are
high in Nigeria particularly in the southeast agro-ecological
zone. Most of the ceremonial yams (large tubers weighing
five to ten kg) are produced in the lowland and
alluvial flood plains of the forest and derived savanna
areas.
In Anam, a flood prone area of Anambra state, yam is
the principal crop. These are cultivated without the use
of inorganic fertilizers. Harvesting starts as early as AprilMay in order to avoid damage caused by floods. Thus
most of the yams are harvested at a stage when they
are physiologically immature and contain about 70 - 80
per cent moisture. Because of the high moisture content
they are prone to rot.
It is not unusual for crazy people to try out new things and
improve their livelihood prospects. Some of these trials
become the harbinger of new ideas and products. It is true
that many of these innovations may not be sustainable. For
example when fishermen use dynamite to kill fish, not only
the young fish die, but the coral reefs are also damaged.
However, fisherman in a Malaysian village were very
imaginative and perhaps not so insensitive to the sustainability
of their practice.
The telephone department, Malaysia was very worried when
the handsets from pubic telephones started disappearing one
after another. On investigation, they came across a mind
boggling innovation. Fishermen in a coastal village took
these handsets and attached the same to two long wires.
These handsets were lowered in the water and the lose ends
were attached to a battery with a switch. When the connection
was made to pass the current, a shrieking sound came out
of the handsets. This sound attracted the fish which were
caught easily.
Honey Bee
Vol 7(1)
January-March, 1996
13
Innovations
Survey of
Innovations
Part XV
Collaborating Institutions
S Mahila Gram Vidyapith, Nardipur
S Gram Bharati, Amrapur
S Sabar Gram Vidyapith, Sonasan
S Lok Niketan Vidyapith, Ratanpur
S Lok Bharati, Sanosara
S Nootan Bharti Vidyapith, Madanagadh
S J C Kumarappa Gram Vidyapith, Gadhada
S B M Shah Gram Vidyapith, Zilia
S Nootan Gram Vidyapith, Thava
S Banas Gram Vidyapith, Amirgadh
S B R S College, Dumiyani
S Gandhi Gram Vidyapith, Vedachhi
S B R S College, Shardagram
S Shree Saraswati Gram Vidyapith, Samoda
S Gujarat Agricultural University
S Dept of Rural Development, Govt of Gujarat
S Dept of Education, Govt of Gujarat
S Jai Research Foundation, Vapi
S L M Pharmacy College, Ahmedabad
S Bharatiya Agro-Industrial Foundation
S Department of Agriculture & Horticulture,
The process began with a two day workshop organised by the Rajasthan Government
in collaboration with IIM-A and SRISTI during December 17-18, 1995. The purpose
of the workshop was to develop a strategy for scouting innovations. Outstanding
village level extension workers, agriculture officers, livestock workers (Gopal),
informal teachers (Shiksha Karmis), school teachers, health workers (Sathins),
agricultural scientists, innovative farmers etc., were invited. Top level policy makers
of various programmes and schemes in the state including the chief secretary, secretary
and directors of education and agriculture etc., also attended the workshop. SRISTI
was invited to share its experiences and provide methodological inputs.
Soon after the workshop, the Rajasthan Government announced a state wide contest
for scouting of innovation among farmers and grassroots functionaries. Wall posters
were prepared and sent to most village panchayats in the state. A special monitoring
cell was set up in the Department of Agriculture. An informal editorial committee
was also set up to launch a local version of Honey Bee Newsletter in Marvadi language.
The results of these initiatives are eagerly awaited.
Team
Anil K Gupta
Kirit K Patel
Jitendra H Suthar
Vijay Chauhan
Dilip Koradia
Alka Raval
Astad Pastakia
Ch Srinivas
S Muralikrishna
Hema Patel
Ramesh Patel
Riya Sinha
Subhashchandra Chothani
Prabhakar Joshi
D C Sharma
Rohit Brandon
Shushil Sharma
Innovations
7101
White grub control through lime
It is a severe problem especially in any
monsoon crops. Kesharam Nehra, a
farmer from village Pratap Pura, brings
40-50 kg lime and spreads it in the open
for 2-3 hrs. Because of the moisture in
the air it becomes granular and smooth.
This lime is broadcasted in a field before
the monsoon.
14
Guess,
what we have
for dinner?
Cement
7103
Curing of tobacco
Farmers make small bundles of
harvested tobacco leaves and keep them
in logs for about 10-15 days to improve
7104
Enhancement of
in turai gourd
7105
Carrot hates nematodes
Farmers broadcast seeds of carrot along
with wheat seeds. Carrot plants are
removed during first and second weeding
once the wheat crop gets established.
Many farmers of Jaipur district believe
that carrot plants prevent the infestation
of nematodes.
Comm: Prem Prakash Sharma, Agriculture
Supervisor, District: Jaipur
7106
Anticipating sowing time for mustard
fruit
setting
15
7107
7108.1
7110.1
7109
Mixing organic and inorganic inputs
to control pest
Twigs of calotropis are kept in the earthen
pot and about 50 g urea is added to it.
Approximately one litre of water is added
and it is sealed air tight by plastering its
mouth with clay soil. This container is
kept in a manure pit for two months. By
this time, calotropis twigs get
decomposed and get mixed with water.
The extract is filtered and used for seed
treatment of wheat, barley and gram.
Crops treated in this manner do not get
affected by termites. The same extract
may be poured into pots of ornamental
plants, to protect them from various soil
pests and increase the growth. This
insecticide reportedly does not affect the
earthworms adversely .
Kheemp
(Leptadenia pyrotechnica)
7110.2
Termite control: Herbal pesticide
made in manure Pit
Approximately five kg of calotropis and
kheemp (Leptadenia pyrotechnica )
twigs each are cut into small pieces and
put in an earthen pot or other container.
About one kg. of salt and 10 litres of urine
of either human or cattle are added to it.
This container is closed air tight and
kept in the manure pit for 15-20 days for
decomposition. The suspension is filtered
through cotton cloth and the filtrate is
applied as an insecticide with irrigation
water. Approximately 10 lit of this
insecticide is required for one ha of land.
Comm: Chaudhari Ramjatan Srisuvalal,
Tehsil: Shambhar Lake, Dist: Jaipur
16
Stemming
Erosion
of
A Case of Horse Husbandry
knowledge:
Loksanskruti Ma Pashuo
Can we conserve cultural diversity
independent of the accompanying
biological diversity? The question is
answered in this outstanding book
written in Gujarati by the renowned
writer Jorawarsinh Jadav (2,
Professors colony Navrangpura,
Ahmedabad - 380 009). It deals with the
cultural significance of animals and
describes eleven animals including the
horse, camel, goat and donkey. A very
interesting account of the historical
background, evolution, mankinds
relation with animals, the various breeds
that used to occur in the past etc. has
been supplemented with beautiful line
drawings. Indeed the author has based
most of his research for the book on the
drawings available at the time and each
illustration has a story to tell.
The part dealing with the horse is
especially informative about the various
indigenous breeds which used to exist
earlier and which are now extinct or on
the verge of extinction. Thirty six distinct
breeds of Saurashtra have been
described. Moreover detailed accounts
of their colour, size,maintenance,
decoration, gait and other facets of their
life give an idea of the indigenous
knowledge existing about horse breeds at
the time. The book has even identified
local horse experts. Today knowledge
about horse breeds is vanishing even
faster than the breeds themselves. Books
such as Loksanskruti Ma Pashuo give
us only a glimpse of the tremendous
storehouse of indigenous knowledge we
had and how rapidly it is getting eroded.
17
Ecopreneurship
Astad R Pastakia
Venerated by some farmers of Maharashtra as Krishi Sant(agricultural saint) for
his pioneering work on natural farming, and yet without a following in his own village
in South Gujarat, Bhaskarbhai Save remains an enigma in the post green revolution
phase of Indian agriculture. Bhaskarbhai, a contemporary of Fukuoka, did not receive
the kind of media attention that the latter received. However, during the past five-six
years he received more than ten thousand letters from all over the world seeking
information about Sajiv Kheti (living agriculture/ natural farming).
Context
Bhaskarbhai Hiraji Save, resides at Dehri,
a coastal village, five km from the industrial
township of Umargaon. In the early fifties,
Bhaskarbhai gave up his job as a school
teacher to take up farming on about 4.5
acres of land. He was amongst the first
to adopt the use of new chemical inputs.
He also became an agent of a leading
chemical fertilizer company.
During the sixties, like most of the farmers
at Dehri, Bhaskarbhai used to grow
vegetables, to supply urban customers in
Bombay and Surat. In 1968-69, he suffered
heavy losses, due to an unexpected drop
in the price of vegetables. Since then, he
had switched over to horticultural crops
such as coconut, chikoo and banana.
His farm, named Kalpavruksha, comprises
of 14 acres of irrigated land. About 10
acres are devoted to horticultural crops,
where Sajiv Kheti is practiced. This
involves cultivation of crops with minimal
interference in natural processes ie.,
allowing nature to do the production. In
about 1.5 acres of land, Bhaskarbhai
cultivates organic paddy, wheat, pulses and
vegetables for home consumption. He
makes the following distinction between
natural and organic farming:
1. In natural farming silt is added to the
soil as an external input while in organic
farming, organic fertilizer is used.
2. No ploughing is done under natural
farming while in case of organic farming
one initial ploughing is necessary.
3. Weeds may be suppressed but not
removed in natural farming while in organic
farming weeding is necessary.
18
19
20
Book Worm
Book Worm
Global
Pesticide
Campaigner Quarterly,
Pesticide Action Network
(PAN), North America
Regional Center, 116, New Montgomery
St. # 810 San Francisco, CA94105, USA .
NORTH AMERICA
REGIONAL CENTER
21
News&Views
Sodh sankal:
experimentors
club
of
support systems
[ Decision
grassroots innovators
for
[ Pesticide
workshop
action
networks
22
Dialogue
Dialogue
Dr K C Dalal
National Research Centre For Medicinal and
Aromatic Plants
Boriavi,Ta. Anand
Gujarat - 387 310.
S H Shukla
Dr O D Date
IRED West Africa
19, Balogun Street
Anifowose
P.O. Box 326
Nigeria
23
N. Murthi Anishetty
Plant Genetic Resources Services
Plant Production and Protection Division
FAO, Rome
Italy
Arun K Agrawal
Kasturbagram Krishi Kshetra
P.O. Kasturbagram
Indore - 452020
S R Sundara Raman
Satyamangalam-1
Erode- 638401
Mr Girish Bhardwaj
PRA UNIT
E-7/73, Lajpat Society
Shahpura Arera Colony
Bhopal - 462 016
Recently our PRA Unit has decided to work
on traditional technologies. In fact we are
not clear how we would go about it but to
begin with we have thought of exploring,
documenting and promoting the farmer
based research on some specific issues.
(We are looking forward to learning from your
experiences. As you might know, we do not
approve of so called PRA kind of approaches.
We are sure that once you start learning
from people, you will come to the same
conclusion. :Ed)
Dr Suresh K. Sinha
National Professor (ICAR)
Water Technology Centre
Indian Agricultural Research Institute
New Delhi - 110 012
P B Vekariya
Rajmoti Society
Timbawadi Road
Junagadh- 362 001
24
P. Vivekanandan
43, TPM Nagar
Virrattipathu
Madurai 625 010
Tamil Nadu
Kannada Honey Bee
Hittalagida
Dr T N Prakash
Dept. of Agri. Economics
UAS, Hebbal
Bangalore 560025
Karnataka
Dr Geervani
Vice-Chancellor
Padmavati Mahila
Viswavidyalayam
Tirupati
Andhra Pradesh
* We are always on look out for new collaborators to translate/adapt Honey Bee into other languages.
National
International
Patron
Rs 2000
US$ 200
Supporter
Rs 500
US$ 50
Scientist/Professionals
Rs 120
US$ 30
Foreign aided NGOs
Rs 500
US$ 50
Farmers/NGOs (without foreign aid)
-Large
Rs 100
US$ 50
Small
Rs 50
US$ 25
Students
Rs 50
US$ 20
Unemployed Worker
Rs 5
Free
Institutions/Libraries
Rs 2500
US$ 100
Life Membership
Individual
Institutions/Libraries
Rs 1500
Rs 10000
US$ 250
US$ 1000