Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Topics in
Transfusion
Medicine
September 2000
Vol 7 No 2
u Editorial Board
Editor:
Ken Davis
Board Members:
Editor's Note
This issue is a pot pourri of various matters, hopefully of interest to a range of members.
Cord blood banking and transplantation is now becoming commonplace in various centres worldwide. The reprinted article form the Institute for Transfusion Medicine [ITxM] Pittsburgh discusses
some of the benefits and difficulties of this new treatment modality.
We are continually faced with areas of blood wastage and at ways of looking to reduce this. The
Californian Blood Bank Society e_network Forum article of the use of unused thawed FFP presents
some thoughts on this particular matter.
In many transfusion laboratories the request to process and store preadmission samples is increasing.
The third edition of our own pretransfusion guidelines deals with this matter. For added interest the
ITxM article on this matter is reprinted for members.
Some time back Lara Griffin, ARCBS, Sydney, posted a question on our own e-mail network regarding
red cell selection in PTP and NAIT. This sent a number of us to the text books and the question was
also posted on the AABB web page. The questions that Lara posed and the response from the AABB
site are published for interest and comment.
Lastly a report from John Lown on the recent WAA/HSANZ/ASBT conjoint meeting in Perth.
Members are encouraged to let the Editor know what topics they would like addressed in future
issues.
Ken Davis
[ken.davis@imvs.sa.gov.au]
Extra copies of Topics in Transfusion Medicine are available from the ASBT office for $20 each.
Please spread the word.
All Correspondence
The Australasian Society of Blood Transfusion Inc
145 Macquarie Street, Sydney NSW 2000
September 2000
Vol 7, No 2
CONTENTS
1. Cord Blood Banking and Transplantation
Richard Moldwin, MD PhD, Medical Director, ITxM Cord Blood Services
Transfusion Medicine Update, Institute for Transfusion Medicine,
Pittsburgh, PA
[reprinted with permission]
Page 1
Page 4
Page 8
Page 10
Page 12
September 2000
Vol 7, No 2
Introduction: Haematopoietic stem cell transplantation can provide a cure for a variety of
malignant and non-malignant disorders (Table 1). In autologous transplants, the patients own
stem cells are collected and stored for later transplantation. In allogeneic transplants, the
transplanted stem cells are derived from a related or unrelated donor. In many cases, an
allogeneic, rather than autologous, transplant is preferred for treating malignant and nonmalignant diseases. Siblings who match the patient for cell surface HLA proteins offer the best
option for allogeneic graft compatibility and a good outcome.
HLA Matching: Unfortunately, matched sibling (allogeneic) donors are available to only
about 30% of those in need of an allogeneic transplant. To help provide matched unrelated
donors for these patients, large registries of volunteers willing to donate marrow (or
peripheral blood stem cells) to unrelated recipients have been established (eg. the National
Marrow Donor Program). However, finding appropriate matches for many patients remains
difficult.
Cord Blood Stem Cell Transplants: One solution to the shortage of matched donors
may be found with umbilical cord blood (CB), which is a rich source of haematopoietic stem
cells. CB has been used successfully in place of bone marrow in children and a few adults
undergoing stem cell transplantation. Since the first CB transplant in 1987, more than 800
such transplants have been done in the US and Europe.
Graft versus Host Disease is Decreased with Cord Blood: Recent data indicate
Cord Bloods Other Advantages: Although CB T cells are less likely to produce serious
GvHD, early data suggests that they can still be effective in suppressing or eliminating
malignant cells remaining in the transplant patient. The presence of a graft-versus-tumour
effect is being closely studied in CB recipients.
There are several other advantages to CB as well. Since CB units are stored frozen, they can
be released immediately to patients in need of a transplant. In contrast, setting up an
unrelated donor stem cell harvest (bone marrow or peripheral blood stem cells) can take
several months.
CB collection also poses no risk to the mother or baby, whereas both bone marrow harvests
and G-CSF-mobilized peripheral blood stem cell harvests have been associated with occasional
serious morbidity and even mortality.
September 2000
Vol 7, No 2
Cord Bloods Disadvantages: Since the numbers of CB stem cells may be insuffic ient to
engraft a large patient (ie. an adult or large child), the patient may die before engraftment
takes place. Even in small patients, where the stem cell numbers are sufficient, engraftment is
usually significantly delayed (~28 days for neutrophils, ~90 days for platelets) when
compared with peripheral blood stem cells (~7 days for neutrophils, ~9 days for platelets).
A further problem is that a patient who does not engraft cannot easily obtain more stem cells
from the CB donor (who is probably still a small child). In contrast, adult unrelated donors
may donate stem cells more than once for the same transplant patient.
The Growing Use of Cord Blood: The shortage of matching CB units can addressed by
the establishment of CB "banks" throughout the world. There are currently about 25,000 units
of CB stored worldwide in CB banks. These CB banks are a life-saving resource for many
patients, who would otherwise die for lack of a suitable stem cell donor. There is a pressing
need for the expansion of CB donor banks to ensure that all patients needing a stem cell
transplant are offered a CB unit with a suitable HLA match.
Autologous Cord Blood Storage : CB stem cells have not yet been used for autologous
transplants (ie. using a childs stored CB for a transplant in that same child, later in life).
However, commercial CB banks have begun to sprout up throughout the country, advertising
autologous CB storage services. The charges for these services range from about $275 to
about $1500, not including yearly storage fees (usually $50-100 per year). Estimates on the
chances of a child ever using such an autologous CB unit for transplant range from 1/10,000
to about 1/50,000. If the family has many children, the stored CB may be of most benefit to
an HLA-matched sibling who needs a transplant. However, even in this case, the sibling CB
donor should still be available to donate peripheral blood stem cells or marrow. Although the
future uses of stored autologous CB are unknown, autologous CB storage would appear to be
of marginal benefit.
"public banks" have been established throughout the world for the cost-free collection of units
for use in stem cell transplantation. The Institute of Transfusion Medicine (ITxM) has recently
established a public cord blood bank. ITxM Cord Blood Services (ICBS) collects, tests, and
freezes units of umbilical CB. It is a community resource dedicated to providing units of CB for
stem cell transplantation and medical research. CB units collected in the Chicago and
Pittsburgh areas will be released in the US as well as abroad, in conjunction with the NMDP.
interested obstetricians, nurses and nurse-midwives. The potential donor (mother) is asked to
consent to:
Providing medical, ethnic, and related information
Donating CB to the CB bank for transplantation and/or research
Providing 7 cc of maternal blood for tests, including HIV testing
Providing information about the newborn's medical history
Collection: After delivery of the newborn, the obstetrician, midwife, or nurse collects the
cord blood using two 60 ml syringes containing an anti-coagulant (CPD-A1). CB stem cells
survive for at least 2 days in the collection syringes at room temperature. No blood is drawn
from the infant for testing.
September 2000
Vol 7, No 2
Processing: When the CB arrives at the processing facility, it is separated into red cell,
white cell, and plasma components. The white cell component, which contains the stem cells,
is cryopreserved using DMSO and Dextran as cryoprotectants. The CB is cultured to detect
microbial contamination, and assays of stem cell activity are performed before freezing. In
addition the mothers blood is tested for HIV, Hepatitis B & C, HTLV I & II, Syphilis, and CMV.
Once the CB is safely frozen, it is HLA-typed, and registered for searching through the NMDP.
Future Prospects: Although there are still hurdles to be overcome using cord blood, this
new approach offers a new chance at life for many patients. In the future, new developments
in stem cell expansion, amelioration of GvHD, and immunotherapy should further refine cord
blood transplantation into a cure for many more patients.
TABLE 1
September 2000
Vol 7, No 2
A member of the CBBS e-network wanted input regarding the high wastage of unused
thawed FFP on their transfusion service. This occurs under two situations:
1. The FFP has been dispensed by the laboratory, but is returned (typically less
than several hours after thaw). In this case, if the plasma has been out of
refrigeration for more than 30 minutes and then returned to the lab, it is
considered to be an automatic discard.
2. In other cases the FFP is ordered but is not picked up. The transfusion service
holds the thawed FFP in their refrigerator for up to 24 hours before discarding it.
The inquiring member wanted to know if other hospitals were relabelling their 'thawed-butalways-refrigerated' FFP as "thawed plasma" at 24 hours, and then storing it for up to 5
days post-thaw and dispensing this plasma to fill FFP orders? If so, are there clinical
indications for which this component is prohibited beyond sole source factor VIII source?
There are studies in the literature showing reasonable preservation of factors V and VIII,
even up to 28 days post thaw (Transfusion 1993; 33:735-8). Have others done their own
in-house studies?
What about the FFP which has been dispensed by the laboratory and then returned? There
are studies showing that 24 hour room temperature storage of whole blood (Transfusion
1999; 39:488-91) or thawed FFP (Transfusion 1980; 20:546-8) have quite good stability of
factors V and VIII over this interval. If FFP is returned to the laboratory and put back into
refrigeration, is it permissible to give this plasma a 24 hour outdate? (See final response
below.)
What follows are the replies of several e-network members.
One member replied that their approach is to try to limit the number of units thawed
at any one time. This member's blood bank advises the requesting physician that units
will be thawed quickly when actually needed. This approach seems to help avoid thawing
plasma that is not actually needed. When an order is received, this blood bank inquires of
the ordering physician how many units they want to give immediately, and thaws only
that number of units - often only one unit at a time. For more units the blood bank requires
about twenty minutes advance notice and units will be thawed as they are needed.
Wasted units and follow-up with the ordering physician are documented through
the Transfusion Committee.
[WebMaster NOTE: While this approach may work in some settings, limiting access to FFP
to one unit at a time, with a 20-minute delay per unit, may not be practical in other
settings, such as a trauma center.]
A second member replied that his institution monitors ordering by physician. All units of
FFP that are ordered, thawed, and not used are included in their blood utilisation
review. This physician-specific data is used for purposes of recredentialing. The member
reports that they have only rare units that are thawed and not used.
September 2000
Vol 7, No 2
A third member replied that in his area, the wastage of FFP often happens on TTP
patients whose exchange gets cancelled or postponed.
This member's blood bank relabels the product as "Liquid Plasma", storing it a 4oC
until the next scheduled plasma exchange, as described in the AABB Technical Manual. The
new expiration date is 5 days from the time the product was thawed.
A fourth member's blood bank routinely uses FFP which has been thawed but not issued.
After 24 hours the FFP is relabelled as thawed plasma and used up to 5 days. This has
been very convenient for trauma patients. Using this inventory management approach the
blood bank saved $3,300 in 1999.
A fifth member commented that she was concerned about another issue, besides the
viability of the product . Her concern was why are all these products being requested
and not used? Her blood bank has had success with educating the nursing staff and,
with their Blood Bank director, addressing the issue through Medical committees.
The member works at a transplant center, where about a year ago their monthly statistics
showed that a significant number of units of FFP were wasted each month. They identified
that the transplant MDs were requesting up to 10 units of FFP to be thawed for
each case and not using the product.
This was discussed in their Transfusion Committee and then the issue was taken up with
the specific Medical committee. The result was that the pre-op ordering routine was
changed to reduce the number of FFP units prepared for surgery for these patients.
A sixth member commented that when she was in the hospital environment, her blood
bank set up an ordering system where they were able to distinguish between a
"hold this in case I need it" order (in which case the blood bank would not thaw)
and a "transfuse this on this date" order (in which case the blood bank would
thaw). In this member's opinion, relabelling and trying to "recover" the plasma wasn't
going to prevent the waste. She felt education might help.
A seventh member stated it was their policy for FFP that has been thawed and
refrigerated to issue it as FFP, provided it is used within 24 hours of thawing. After
24 hours the unit is discarded. As for products issued and kept at room temperature for
an extended period of time, it is their policy to return them to the Blood Bank for discard.
An eighth member had this to offer. Blood components leaving the blood bank and
laboratory for an extended period of time create problems with regard to how they are
stored and how storage conditions are documented. Some hospitals have O.R. refrigerators
dedicated to holding blood components (RBC's and FFP) until they are needed. If the
components are not used they can be returned at any reasonable time (within expiration
dates or times), provided that proper re-identification procedures are followed on the
components after their return to the blood bank. The medical center at which I worked
used this system for around the last five years in their open heart surgery rooms. The
refrigeration also inhibits bacterial contamination of FFP and RBC's. The problems arise
when you have more than one patient with more than one type of unit/component and so
on. The program at this medical center has low numbers of such cases, so there is less risk
of errors resulting from this kind of practice. This member believes there is a far greater
wastage of FFP and blood in the E.R., other operating rooms, and ICU's where there can be
many units transfused and/or "wasted". In these areas it can be diffic ult to apply this kind
of policy/procedure, due to cost and respective practicality. As for FFP, there is an
alternative with SD-Plasma (Plas+SD).
September 2000
Vol 7, No 2
September 2000
Vol 7, No 2
Introduction
Increasingly, admissions for elective surgical procedures are occurring the same day of
surgery. Most preoperative laboratory testing is completed days in advance of the scheduled
procedure. This often does not include blood bank testing, creating a logistic challenge for
the transfusion service when patients are admitted when patients are admitted.
Typically, patients must present to the preop holding areas a few hours before a scheduled
procedure. For surgical cases requiring the use of blood, a sample is drawn at this time for
compatibility testing. Often this provides less than two hours of turn-around-time to
complete testing before a scheduled surgery. Any delay in blood availability can impact the
patient and operating room schedule significantly.
Preoperative services that the blood bank provides include preoperative autologous blood
donations and the Maximum Surgical Blood Ordering Schedule (MSBOS).
MSBOS
MSBOS is based on data collected from surgical records of blood usage at an institution. The
MSBOS provides recommendations on the maximum number of units to order for common
elective procedures. Options for testing include no blood required, type and screen required,
or type and crossmatches, stating the number of units to be crossmatched. It is
recommended that surgeons, who routinely require less than one unit of blood, should only
order a type and screen.
September 2000
Vol 7, No 2
Once the MSBOS is established, the transfusion service will follow these guidelines to meet
blood requirements for each patient undergoing that particular procedure.
MSBOS facilitates the availability of blood for surgery by minimizing the amount of blood tied
up in the crossmatch inventory. Also, it prevents patients from going to the OR without
sufficient blood ordered.
Autologous blood collection should be attempted for every medically eligible patient
undergoing an elective surgical procedure who will require transfusion.
Contraindications for autologous donations generally include cardiovascular disease with
compromised hemodynamic reserves or risk of bacterial contamination of the collected
blood.
Unnecessary collection of autologous blood is not without risks to the donor. The decrease in
haemoglobin levels put the patient at risk for transfusion. Units are typically collected on a
weekly basis and no less than 72 hours prior to surgery.
Blood ABO and Rh typing are the only required tests for an autologous unit collected and
transfused in the same facility. However, autologous units that are collected by a blood
center need to be fully tested (including viral markers) in order to be distributed to the
hospital facilities. Autologous blood donation is best ordered as packed red cells versus
whole blood, in order to extend the shelf life of that unit up to six weeks after collection.
Summary
Most transfusion services provide options that facilitate blood availability for surgery.
Physicians (surgeons, primary care), medical institutions, and health insurance companies
should maximise the use of these benefits provided by transfusion services.
Copyright 1999, Institute For Transfusion Medicine
September 2000
Vol 7, No 2
The questions you ask are interesting. Here is my opinion with some references to
support them. I must admit that this comes mostly from reviewing the literature. I have
been involved in the care of only one patient with PTP and about ten patients with NAIT.
The majority of the latter have been due to anti-HPA-1a.
10
11
The Congress in Perth portrayed an additional dimension to the usual annual scientific
meetings of the HSANZ and ASBT. The involvement of the WAA resulted in more than the
usual number of international identities participating than would normally be the case at
our national meetings, with consequent benefits to the programme. With up to 7
concurrent sessions running at times, there was inevitable difficulty deciding which
session to attend. Some topics covered included:
September 2000
Vol 7, No 2
12
13
Haemovigilance
The ARCBS Haemovigilance working party presented an update of progress in the
development of a national haemovigilance system. This was preceded by an excelle nt
overview by Lorna Williamson of the Serious Hazards of Transfusion programme
operating in the UK. This programme seeks to identify major transfusion related adverse
events. These include:
Incorrect blood component transfused
Immediate clinical transfusion reactions
Delayed transfusion reactions
TRALI
PTP
TAGVHD
Post transfusion infections
Over a three year period to 1999, 618 cases have been reported to the SHOT programme
of which 54% involved the transfusion of wrong blood/patie nt. 28% were clinical
reactions.
There were 28 transfusion associated deaths; 10 from TAGVHD, 4 ABO incompatibility, 4
TRALI and 10 due to infectious agents.
The major source of error resulting in transfusion of the wrong blood/patient was the
removal of blood from the blood bank. Other causes were sample collection & labelling,
bedside checks, laboratory errors and prescribing errors.
An overview of the pharmacovigilance system currently in place at CSL Ltd was provided
by Margaret Curran. This was a very useful contribution as one of the aims of the
Australian Working Party is to link the haemovigilance programme with the
pharmacovigilance system at CSL.
An Australian pilot study involving two hospitals commenced in January 2000. The
Working Party are now inviting participation from other institutions.
September 2000
Vol 7, No 2
14