Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
com
1 of 4
http://physicsworld.com/cws/article/news/2015/feb/05/photons-simulat...
This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site you agree to our use of cookies. To find out more, see our Privacy and Cookies policy.
5 comments
Grandfather clause
In classical physics the existence of closed time-like curves would lead to a number of
paradoxes. One of the best known of these is the grandfather paradox, in which someone who
has travelled backwards in time kills their grandfather while he is still young, thereby preventing
their own birth. In quantum mechanics, however, such paradoxes can be avoided.
The quantum-mechanical equivalent of the grandfather paradox involves a subatomic particle
that has two states one and zero corresponding to "alive" and "dead". The paradox
emerges if the particle started out in state one, travelled backwards in time, met a younger
version of itself and then flipped the value of its earlier self to zero.
But in 1991 David Deutsch of Oxford University showed that the probabilistic nature of
quantum mechanics comes to the rescue. Deutsch found that there would always be a state
that a quantum particle could assume that would make the particle's trip back in time a safe
one. For example, if the particle were to start out in an equal mixture of one and zero, when
flipped it would remain in that state a 50:50 mixture of one and zero.
07/02/2015 21:52
2 of 4
http://physicsworld.com/cws/article/news/2015/feb/05/photons-simulat...
Consistency condition
One of these detectors constitutes the entrance to the "wormhole" and is used to record the
state of the older photon to ensure that is in the same state as it is at the beginning of the
experiment the point at which it emerges from the wormhole. In this way, the scheme satisfies
the "consistency condition" that Deutsch imposed on his model to remove the paradoxes from
time travel that whatever goes into a wormhole emerges from it unchanged.
Encoding the younger photon arbitrarily with one of 32 different polarizations and fixing the
state of the older photon to satisfy the consistency condition, the researchers showed that they
could indeed meet this condition. They also found that the presence of a closed time-like curve
allows an observer to perfectly distinguish non-orthogonal states of the time-travelling photon,
such as horizontal and diagonal polarizations. This is something that cannot normally be done
in quantum-mechanical systems.
Encryption buster
According to project leader Tim Ralph, this result suggests a way to break quantum encryption,
since any eavesdropper with access to a closed time-like curve would in principle be able to
make a perfect copy of the secret key and so avoid revealing his or her presence via quantum
measurements. More broadly, he says, the research could provide an insight into the tension
between quantum mechanics and general relativity, given that closed time-like curves are only
possible with strong gravitational curvature.
Todd Brun of the University of Southern California describes the work as a "very nice
experimental demonstration of some of the bizarre consequences" of Deutsch's model,
although he says that the research is not able to test the model itself. Others, however, are
more critical.
Entirely predictable
Charles Bennett of IBM says that the results from the experiment are "entirely predictable from
well-established principles of quantum optics" and that what is instead needed is "continued
theoretical exploration of closed time-like curves' consistency with, and consequences for,
other parts of physics". He also believes that the experimental set-up "does not function as a
mechanism for reliably distinguishing non-orthogonal states". This is a view shared by Antoni
Wjcik of Adam Mickiewicz University in Poland, who says that the experiment "provides very
interesting confirmation of standard quantum mechanics but "does not answer any question"
concerning time-travelling quantum particles.
Also critical is Seth Lloyd of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, who has developed a
rival model to Deutsch's. He points out that in the latest experiment there is no physical
connection between what comes out of and goes into the wormhole, and that as a result the
wormhole's output has to be classically computed and then manufactured. "This defeats the
purpose of quantum simulation," he says, "which is to predict what one can't simulate
classically."
The research was first described in Nature Communications and the paper is now available on
the arXiv preprint server.
5 comments
Add your comments on this article
duwaynea
Feb 5, 2015 10:22 PM
Hillsboro, United States
From the article: "Although everyday experience suggests the impossibility of travelling backwards or forwards in
time,..."
Well, just this morning I traveled forward in time. When I got up it was 5:00 am, and now it's 2:13, so I traveled
forward in time by 9 hours and 13 minutes. I expect to travel forward in time again, and leave work, go home and
07/02/2015 21:52
3 of 4
http://physicsworld.com/cws/article/news/2015/feb/05/photons-simulat...
eat dinner. Then I'll travel forward once more, go to bed, arise tomorrow morning, and repeat the experiment.
Obviously, "everyday experience" certainly *does* suggest the very real possibility of moving "forward in time." We
do it all the time.
With that said, I think it would be extremely helpful for someone to define exactly what moving backward in time
would involve. How does mass/energy conservation and information theory fit into the scenario of time travel? If a
time traveler moves backward in time, do they retain the memories of the future? Does future information content
travel to the past with them? If so, what does this mean for entropy, esp. as it relates to information theory?
skynr
Feb 6, 2015 5:29 AM
To duwaynea,
There is a definite difference between going forward 'in' time and going forward 'with' time. Please check your
analytic wording and thus any conclusion from it before presenting any hypotheses. Thanks.
M. Asghar
Feb 6, 2015 11:33 AM
AntiGrav
Feb 6, 2015 9:44 PM
07/02/2015 21:52
4 of 4
http://physicsworld.com/cws/article/news/2015/feb/05/photons-simulat...
AntiGrav
Feb 7, 2015 3:11 PM
07/02/2015 21:52