Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
e-ISSN: 2278-1684,p-ISSN: 2320-334X, Volume 12, Issue 1 Ver. IV (Jan- Feb. 2015), PP 01-07
www.iosrjournals.org
Abstract: Recent growth in India for construction of large span roof steel structure using shop fabricated steel
sheet built-up members are facing challages in trasportation and erection from shop to site. Lattice frame
construction using rolled section for larger span can be batter solution if feasible to construct on site with
restrcited dimensions and lighter weight. Using systematic analysis of various altenatives of large span roof a
solution to adopt most economical profile is presentrd in this paper work using software based analysis results.
Keywords: Pre Engineering Building( PEB), Lattice Portal frame(LPF),Wind Load(WL), Dead Load(DL),
Live Load(LL),Reinforced Cement Concrete(RCC), Beuraw of Indian Standard(BIS)
I.
Introduction
DOI: 10.9790/1684-12140107
www.iosrjournals.org
1 | Page
III.
A.
1)
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
9)
10)
Basic data for Member Force Calculations:Building size 100 mtr x 60 mtr
Span of building - 60 mtr
Height of column at eaves to decide,
Slope of roof- to decide by designer
Location of building coastal zone of Gujarat
Use of shed to store coal
Roof covering non asbestos cement sheets
Cladding same as roof
Spacing of truss to decide by designer
Seismic zone zone IV
= 0.6 V2
= 0.6x (36)
= 781.06 N/m
= 0.781 KN/m
For Design purpose we have consider Pz= 1 KN/m. Assume Normal permeability, since slope is less than 10,
Live load= 75 Kg/m= 750 N/m & External wind base side pressure= (-) 0.7p. Internal wind pressure for
DOI: 10.9790/1684-12140107
www.iosrjournals.org
2 | Page
Purlin
purlin + self Weight
purlin Spacing.
supported by truss.
x Node Spacing
Purlin
purlin Spacing.
Load Combinations
Load Combination for STAAD Analysis ( Nodal point load is considered for analysis with appropriate value
and direction for load combination)
D.L.+L.L.
--------------------------------Load Combination (1)
D.L.
Imposed Load
=4.5 KN.
=5.50 KN.
D.L.+L.L.
=10.0 KN.
D.L.+W.L.1
--------------------------------Load Combination (2)
D.L.1
W.L.1
W.L.L.1
= 4.5 KN - 0.3 KN
= 4.1 KN. On Rafter
= 0.7P
= 0.7 X 1.2
= 0.84 KN.
On Wind ward.
= 0.3P
= 0.3 X 1.2
= 0.36 KN.
On Lee Ward.
D.L.+W.L.2
--------------------------------Load Combination (3)
D.L.2
= 4.5 KN - 0.84 KN
DOI: 10.9790/1684-12140107
= 3.66 KN On Rafter.
www.iosrjournals.org
3 | Page
= 0.3P
On Wind ward.
= 0.7P
On Lee ward.
= 0.36 KN
= 0.84 KN
D.L.+W.L.3
-------------------------------Load Combination (4)
D.L.3
W.L.3
W.L.L.3
= 4.5 KN.-0.96 KN
= 0.2P
On Wind ward.
= 0.2P
On Lee ward.
= 3.4 KN On Rafter
= 0.24 KN
= 0.24 KN
30mtr
1.576
1.842
2.108
2.376
2.645
IV.
40mtr
2.102
2.455
2.811
3.168
3.527
50mtr
2.628
3.07
3.514
3.96
4.408
60mtr
3.153
3.684
4.216
4.751
5.29
Results
Using spread sheets prepared on the basis of polynomial equations, member forces are worked out for
unit loading on rafter for different geometry of slopes and eaves height for Three Different Span is as below.
DOI: 10.9790/1684-12140107
www.iosrjournals.org
4 | Page
=
=
40 mtr
1kN
Rise
In Deg.
60
70
80
90
10 0
Column Height=5mtr
Moment-KnMtr
Base
96.67
95.89
94.41
92.41
90.07
Eaves
95.15
80.85
84.33
80.16
76.33
Rise
In Deg.
60
70
80
90
10 0
Column Height=6mtr
Moment-KnMtr
Base
90.54
91.09
90.73
89.88
86.63
Eaves
100.12
94.76
90.79
87.04
83.49
Rise
In Deg.
60
70
80
90
10 0
Column Height=7mtr
Moment-KnMtr
Base
Eaves
85.42
103.26
86.62
98.72
86.91
95.29
86.75
91.98
86.23
88.79
Rise
In Deg.
60
70
80
90
10 0
Column Height=8mtr
Moment-KnMtr
Base
Eaves
81.21
105.24
82.71
101.38
83.36
98.41
83.62
95.51
83.57
92.68
Centre
48.14
42.12
37.71
33.54
29.6
Shear in Kn
Reaction
20
20
20
20
20
Rise
In Deg.
60
70
80
90
10 0
Column Height=9mtr
Moment-KnMtr
Base
77.74
79.36
80.2
80.72
80.96
Centre
52.62
47.08
42.97
39.05
35.31
Shear in Kn
Reaction
20
20
20
20
20
=
=
Rise
In Deg.
60
70
80
90
10 0
Column Height=5mtr
Moment-KnMtr
Base
160.56
157.01
151.11
144.52
139.07
Rise
In Deg.
60
70
80
90
10 0
Column Height=6mtr
Moment-KnMtr
Base
152.93
151.64
148.59
144.56
140.9
Rise
Column Height=7mtr
Moment-KnMtr
Shear in Kn
Reaction
20
20
20
20
20
Centre
28.11
20.43
15.17
10.47
6.28
Fix Base
Eaves
133.74
126.36
117.6
109.95
104.54
Eaves
144.24
137.69
129.49
122.1
116.72
1.4
2.01
2.45
2.74
Thrust
-0.61
-0.01
0.47
0.85
Shear in Kn
Reaction
20
20
20
20
20
Centre
42.81
36.26
31.53
27.12
23.01
50 mtr
1kN/mtr
Thrust
Shear in Kn
Reaction
20
20
20
20
20
Centre
36.31
29.19
24.15
19.53
15.31
Eaves
106.44
103.13
100.56
98.02
95.52
Span
UDL
DOI: 10.9790/1684-12140107
Base
(D.L. + L.L)
Thrust
-1.72
-1.19
-0.74
-0.36
Thrust
-2.33
-1.88
-1.48
-1.13
Thrust
-2.64
-2.26
-1.92
-1.61
Base
Fix Base
(D.L. + L.L)
Centre
24.24
16.11
6.79
-1.04
6.42
Shear in Kn
Reaction
25
25
25
25
25
Thrust
5.36
6.12
6.7
6.91
6.9
Centre
37.99
30.17
20.78
12.61
6.84
Shear in Kn
Reaction
25
25
25
25
25
Thrust
1.44
2.32
3.18
3.74
4.03
Shear in Kn
www.iosrjournals.org
5 | Page
Base
145.36
145.4
144.22
142.01
139.72
Eaves
151.36
145.85
138.46
131.59
126.49
Centre
49.24
41.81
32.69
24.55
18.67
Rise
In Deg.
60
70
80
90
10 0
Column Height=8mtr
Moment-KnMtr
Base
Eaves
138.56
156.86
139.36
151.77
139.37
145.17
138.41
138.91
137.12
134.18
Centre
58.71
51.54
42.84
34.91
29.09
Rise
In Deg.
60
70
80
90
10 0
Column Height=9mtr
Moment-KnMtr
Base
Eaves
132.64
160.51
133.88
156.04
134.63
150.18
134.52
144.53
133.93
140.2
Centre
66.32
59.8
51.55
43.93
38.26
Span
UDL
=
=
Rise
In Deg.
60
70
80
90
10 0
Column Height=5mtr
Moment-KnMtr
Base
Eaves
238.05
175.08
226.66
161.68
214.46
150.27
203.32
141.36
191.42
132.9
Rise
In Deg.
60
70
80
Column Height=6mtr
Moment-KnMtr
Base
Eaves
232.55
196.36
224.78
170.74
220.58
173.36
DOI: 10.9790/1684-12140107
60 mtr
1kN/mtr
Reaction
25
25
25
25
25
Shear in Kn
Reaction
25
Thrust
-0.89
-0.06
0.82
1.48
1.89
25
25
25
Thrust
-2.28
-1.55
-0.72
-0.06
0.36
Shear in Kn
Reaction
25
25
25
25
25
Thrust
-3.09
-2.46
-1.72
-1.11
-0.69
Base
Fix Base
Centre
14.64
0.93
-10.31
-18.83
-26.69
Shear in Kn
Reaction
30
30
30
30
30
Thrust
12.59
12.99
12.83
12.39
11.7
Centre
39.16
20.79
14
Shear in Kn
Reaction
30
30
30
Thrust
6.3
7.5
7.87
(D.L. + L.L)
www.iosrjournals.org
6 | Page
Member
different
out as above for unit
uniform results at
trusses and column
pattern.
For
results ratio of Izz for
Truss is considered to
assumption
gives
column but at the same
considerable moment
eaves. Since truss
column length, overall
achieved.
Base is
gives less load in truss
V.
Conclusion
90
10 0
208.93
204.86
Rise
In Deg.
60
70
80
90
10 0
Column Height=7mtr
Moment-KnMtr
Base
Eaves
222.52 209.07
219.1
193.8
216.69 187.78
209.07 174.04
206.19 169.87
Rise
In Deg.
60
70
80
90
10 0
Rise
In Deg.
60
70
80
90
10 0
159.19
154.98
Column Height=8mtr
Moment-KnMtr
Base
Eaves
212.68 218.4
212.1
204.62
210.93 199.06
206.34 186.14
204.41 182.13
Column Height=9mtr
Moment-KnMtr
Base
Eaves
203.73 225.28
204.95 212.91
204.64 207.85
202.24 195.88
201.03 192.11
-0.63
-4.85
30
30
8.29
8.31
Centre
55.95
37.94
31.09
15.97
11.5
Shear in Kn
Reaction
30
30
30
30
30
Thrust
1.92
3.61
4.13
5
5.18
Centre
69.92
52.64
45.92
30.81
26.27
Shear in Kn
Reaction
30
30
30
30
30
Thrust
-0.71
0.93
1.48
2.52
2.78
Centre
81.71
65.29
58.81
43.99
39.47
Shear in Kn
Reaction
30
30
30
30
30
Thrust
-2.39
-0.88
-0.35
0.7
0.99
forces
results
of
configuration, worked
loading, shows that
eaves junction
in
follows one particular
calculation of above
column and Izz for
be
unity.
This
heavier design for
time
will
reduce
in truss members near
length is more than
economy
can
be
considered as rigid,
members.
Observing
above results and its
uniformity pattern, It
is possible to narrate
that forces becomes uniform in one particular patter which has following approximate relation between span and
eaves height,
H= m X ( /) X L,
H= Eaves Height
= Pitch of Roof
L = Span of Rafter
m= co-efficient varies between 3.00 to 4.00, depending upon the pitch.
In many cases height of column is to be decided by an architect as client has having limitation on
minimum height in storage type of sheds. This relation is helpful in finalising Geometry of the portal to be
design for uniform member forces at critical locations, which in turn gives balance design, giving overall
economy in weight.
Hand calculations are advised to proceed further for deciding preliminary member sizes based on SP
47: 2003. A STAAD model is than prepared and run for detail analysis.
WHERE
References
[1].
[2].
[3].
[4].
[5].
[6].
[7].
[8].
[9].
[10].
[11].
[12].
[13].
[14].
DOI: 10.9790/1684-12140107
www.iosrjournals.org
7 | Page