Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
and Opportunities
related to I/M
Prepared by Michel Zambon Alves
Main Topics
OBD Introduction
OBDBr Regulations
How does OBD work?
OBDBr-2 Highlights
USA I/M Program Overview
Final Considerations
OBD Introduction
OBD
OBD-II
JOBD
EOBD
OBDBr-2
OBDBr Regulation
CONAMA RESOLUTION 354/2004
REGULATORY INSTRUCTIONS
general requirements
implementation phase-in
detailed technical
requirements
OBDBr-1
OBDBr-1
OBDBr-2
2010 2011
60% 100%
126/2006
OBDBr-2
Proposed text sent to CONAMA
Practical Example
Background Ignition System Monitoring
OBDBrOBDBr-1
OBDBrOBDBr-2
Coil 1
Coil 2
Coil 3
Coil 4
Practical Example
Misfire on cylinder #3
Practical Example
Misfire on cylinder #3
Practical Example
Misfire on cylinder #3
E19 to E30
E90 to E100
MONITOR DISABLEMENT
(oxygen sensors, catalyst, misfire)
IMPORTED VEHICLES
ENHANCED
1992
1974
1978
NEW
JERSEY
I/M
POLICY
1995
2002
ARIZONA,
COLORADO
OBD I/M
BASIC
1996
OBD-II
Basic I/M
visual inspection of
emission control
devices
Enhanced I/M
visual inspection of emission
control devices
pre-1981 MY: idle testing (HC, CO)
vs Conventional I/M
Oregon and Wisconsin data shows average OBD failure rates very similar
to tailpipe testing
Necessary repairs to deactivate the MIL and to comply with I/M tailpipe
testing have similar average costs
vs Conventional I/M
ADVANTAGES
OBD thresholds are generally more stringent than I/M
standards
Scan tools are used instead of dynamometers and gas
analyzers and they are far less expensive
Safety concerns related to dynamometer operation can be
avoided
Test times are significantly faster
DISADVANTAGES
OBD regulations are generally delayed in relation to I/M
ones
Technical people would need to be properly trained to
perform OBD inspections
AEA SEMINAR - Apr 2nd, 2009
PAGE 18
Final Considerations
Thank you!
contact: malves13@ford.com