Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
2 Philosophical application
Ren Descartes uses the chiliagon as an example in his
Sixth Meditation to demonstrate the dierence between
pure intellection and imagination. He says that, when one
thinks of a chiliagon, he does not imagine the thousand
sides or see them as if they were present before him
as he does when one imagines a triangle, for example.
The imagination constructs a confused representation,
which is no dierent from that which it constructs of a
myriagon (a polygon with ten thousand sides). However,
he does clearly understand what a chiliagon is, just as he
understands what a triangle is, and he is able to distinguish it from a myriagon. Therefore, the intellect is not
dependent on imagination, Descartes claims, as it is able
to entertain clear and distinct ideas when imagination is
unable to.[1] Philosopher Pierre Gassendi, a contemporary of Descartes, was critical of this interpretation, believing that while Descartes could imagine a chiliagon, he
could not understand it: one could perceive that the word
'chiliagon' signies a gure with a thousand angles [but]
that is just the meaning of the term, and it does not follow
that you understand the thousand angles of the gure any
better than you imagine them.[2]
Henri Poincar uses the chiliagon as evidence that intuition is not necessarily founded on the evidence of the
See also
Myriagon
Megagon
References
REFERENCES
5.1
Text
5.2
Images
5.3
Content license