Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Atheism
and
Country
... See pg. 2
$2.95
aaaaaa a
AMERICAN ATHEISTS
is a non- profit, non- political, educational organization, dedicated to the complete and absolute separation of
state and church. We accept the explanation
of Thomas Jefferson that the "First Amendment"
to the
Constitution of the United States was meant to create a "wall of separation" between state and church.
American Atheists are organized to stimulate and promote freedom of thought and inquiry concerning
religious beliefs, creeds, dogmas, tenets, rituals and practices;
to collect and disseminate information, data and literature on all religions and promote a more thorough
understanding of them, their origins and histories;
to encourage the development and public acceptance of a human ethical system, stressing the mutual
sympathy, understanding
and interdependence
of all people and the corresponding
responsibility of each
individual in relation to society;
to develop and propagate a culture in which man is the central figure who alone must be the source of
strength, progress and ideals for the well-being and happiness of humanity;
to promote the study of the arts and sciences and of all problems affecting the maintenance,
perpetuation and enrichment of human (and other) life;
to engage in such social, educational, legal and cultural activity as will be useful and beneficial to
members of American Atheists and to society as a whole.
Atheism may be defined as the mental attitude which unreservedly accepts the supremacy of reason and
aims at establishing a lifestyle and ethical outlook verifiable by experience
and the scientific method,
independent of all arbitrary assumptions of authority and creeds.
Materialism declares that the cosmos is devoid of immanent conscious purpose; that it is governed by its own
inherent, immutable and impersonal laws; that there is no supernatural interference in human life; that man finding his resources within himself - can and must create his own destiny. Materialism restores to man his
dignity and his intellectual integrity. It teaches that we must prize our life on earth and strive always to improve
it. It holds that man is capable of creating a social system based on reason and justice. Materialism's "faith" is in
man and man's ability to transform the world culture by his own efforts. This is a commitment which is in very
essence life asserting. It considers the struggle for progress as a moral obligation and impossible without noble
ideas that inspire man to bold creative works. Materialism holds that humankind's potential for good and for an
outreach to more fulfilling cultural development is, for all practical purposes, unlimited .
****
**
* * *.*.**
:
membership
S500.00
S100.00/year
S50.00/year
S40.00/year
S20.00/year
S12.00/year
*1.0. required
All membership categories receive our monthly "Insider's Newsletter," membership card(s), a
subscription to American Atheist magazine for the duration of the membership period, plus additional
organizational mailings, i.e. new products for sale, convention and meeting announcements, etc.
Vol. 27 , No 5
May, 1985
American Atheist
A Journal of Atheist News and Thought
5
6
8
11
15
17
19
20
23
24
28
29
30
31
33
36
37
38
40
40
On The Cover: To paraphrase an old English saying - "Now is the time for all good Atheists to come to the aid of their country." It
might be added that the time for such action is long overdue. Civilization has entered into a second Age of Enlightenment which, this
time, is originating, to an impressive degree, in our own nation. During the nineteenth century Enlightenment, physical and intellectual
release from the burdens of religio-political repression and the attempted proliferation of scientific information and rational thought were
bitterly opposed by church-controlled authoritarianism. The problems thus generated, in a large sense, were jousts between Left-and
Right-wing factions of religion in general. But, there existed a generous sprinkling of early Atheism which was largely responsible for the
necessarily limited success of the movement. If you have been reading the American Atheist magazine you are aware of much of the
history of the era. Today, the with even more rapid development of scientific (i.e. rational) knowledge, insanely fundamental religious
interests are again hopelessly trying to stem the inevitable; the further intellectual advancement of humanity. This time Atheism is in the
forefront. Be conscious of our true Americanism. Be proud of our inherent Atheism which willallow it to flourish.
G.Tholen
Editor/Robin Murray-O'Hair, Editor Emeritus/Madalyn Murray O'Hair, Managing Editor/Jon G. Murray, Assistant Editor/Gerald Tholen,Poetry/Angeline
Bennett, Gerald Tholen, Production Staff/Bill Kight, Gloria Tholen, Sandra M.P.
McGann, Douglas A. Barnes Non-Resident/G. Stanley Brown, Jeff Frankel, Merrill
Holste, Margaret Bhatty, Fred Woodworth, Frank R. Zindler.
The American Atheist magazine
is indexed in
Monthly Periodical Index
ISSN: 03324310
copyright 1984 by Society of Separationists, Inc.
NEW ADDRESS:
OLD ADDRESS:
(please print)
Name
Name
Address
Address
City
City
State
Zip
(Please print)
State
zip
Austin, Texas
May, 1985
Page 1
EDITORIAL/Jon G. Murray
Page 2
Relocation
Attempt
May, 1985
American Atheist
LET'S
We must keep in mind as we go along that
Atheism has a proud American heritage.
Some of the most valued contributors to
modern society (from many different nations) were and are Atheists. We are few,
but we are the elite and we should be very
proud of that. Atheists are Atheists, by and
large, because they are those who possess
the basic power to reason required to escape
from the systemic net of irrationality that
covers our daily lives. We are continually
bombarded, day and night, by religious,
political, economic, and ideologic irrationality in this nation. The United States is now,
in fact, the chief exporter nation of fundamentalist religion to the world, a title that has
a hidden warning for those of us who are
concerned with world politics.
The time is now for Atheists to make
themselves known in their communities and
to stand up and -show off both their courage
and their reason in the face of irrationality.
On Saturday, April 6th, a local television
station sent its camera crew to the Convention. With three hundred and ten seats filled,
those of us at the speakers' podium were
pleased to see Atheists smile into cameras
panned closely on their faces - the most
that anyone did to change appearance was
to check that a necktie was properly straight,
or that a dress was without a creasing fold.
Not one person dived under a table. What
does the cigarette ad stress? "You've come
a long way, baby." And, indeed, Atheism
has.
C-ONSUL T
TINKER-BELLE'
ON TI-f IS ONE....
Austin, Texas
May, 1985
Page 3
Page 4
May, 1985
and Justice
for All
pg.
39)
American Atheist
ASK A.A.
In Letters to the Editor, readers give
their opinions, ideas, and information.
But in "Ask A.A." American Atheists
answers questions regarding its policies, positions, and customs, as well as
queries of factual and historical situations.
I just found out that John Quincy Adams
swore on a lawbook, not the Bible, during his
inauguration. Why did he do that? Was he
an Atheist or just intelligent enough to
realize that church and state must remain
separate? Did any other presidents swear on
anything other than the Bible?
Source: NBC News, 3:40 p.m. EST, 21st
January, 1985
Joe Wanner
Pennsylvania
The Founding Fathers and the first five
presidents of the United States were deists.
They eschewed the Bible as a document of
import. Persons either attacking or ignoring
the Judeo-Christian Bible were Co/. Ethan
Allen, Thomas Paine, George Mason,
Benjamin Franklin and Presidents George
Washington, John Adams, Thomas Jefferson, James Madison, and john Quincy
Adams. At one point John Adams, in a letter
to Thomas Jefferson, purportedly said,
"This would be the best of all possible
worlds if there were no religion in it." We are
attempting at this point to authenticate the
quote. It is allegedly in a letter which
Jefferson wrote to Adams, quoting Adams'
earlier letter to Jefferson. John Adams was,
of course, the father of John Quincy Adams.
Deists, in the day and age of the founding
of our republic, adhered to a system of
thought that advocated a natural religion,
divorced from the Judeo-Christian Bible,
based on reason rather than revelation,
emphasizing nature's harmony and intelligibility, and rejecting the idea that the
Creator could interfere with the laws of
nature and the matters of mankind on
earth. Simply put, and as it appears in our
Declaration of Independence, the Founding
Fathers believed in "... nature and nature's
God." It is axiomatic that they would not
accept the Bible, but considering the political state of affairs at that time, it is not
surprising that most of the Presidents did
succumb and use the Bible for swearing in.
The younger Adams was, simply, a man of
bravery and conviction.
American Atheists solicits Atheist researchers to assist infinding the answers to
all of these queries. We would like to know
the comments concerned with John Quincy
Adams' actions at the time, and his replies, if
any.
Austin, Texas
May, 1985
PageS
ATHEIST ADRESSES
STATE LEGISLATURE
In December, 1984, Ohio State Rep.
Paul Jones, D-Ravenna, tried to get a
bill passed in the Ohio Legislature to
remove the religious exemption from
the child absue laws (sections 2151.03,
2151.421, and 2919.22 of the Ohio Revised Code), but lobbying groups such
as the Christian Science Church succeeded in scuttling Jones' bill. That left
intact the following language:
"Nothing in this section shall be
construed to define as an abused
or neglected child any child who is
under spiritual treatment through
prayer in accordance with the
tenets and practice of a wellrecognized religion in lieu of medical treatment."
To save the children, once again, Rep.
Jones introduced another bill (House
Bill No. 67) which seeks to remove such
language from the laws of Ohio. Hearings on the bill were held on March 21,
1985, at the Ohio State House, before a
subcommittee of the House Children
and Youth Committee. The subcommittee was chaired by Rep. Jane Campbell.
Frank R. Zindler, representing the
Ohio Chapter of American Atheists testified before the subcommittee on that
date. He told reporters, "I cannot tell
the legislators how to vote but it is my
hope that if they have a better understanding of the constitutional and social
dimensions of the issue, they will be
able to take whatever action is needed
to make Ohio as safe a place for children as are most other states."
The text of his addresS follows:
Introductory Comments
I am Frank Zindler, speaking on behalf of
the Central Ohio Chapter of American
Atheists. American Atheists is also known
as the Society of Separationists. We are an
educational organization devoted to the
maintenance of absolute separation of state
and church. It is one of our major tenets that
most of the evils of the world are the result of
ignorance or at least are made worse by
ignorance. Our educational out-reach is,
Page 6
therefore, an attempt to help solve some of sometimes bitter pills to swallow. That the
the world's most serious problems. It is child should have a say in the matter seems
not to be a concern of at least some of the
hoped that by sharing the atheist understanding of the question of faith-healing - as legislators 'who voted last December to
maintain the religious exemptions from the
well as our understanding of the requirements of the Federal Constitution with re- laws against child abuse.
The idea that the child should be allowed
gard to "tate-church separation - the Ohio
State Legislature may be assisted in arriving to live long enough to be able to develop a
religious opinion differing from that of his
at the best possible solution of the problem
parents - if it is thought of at all - is
posed by the religious abuse of children.
First let me share my understanding of the rejected in horror by parents who, like the
biblical patriarch Abraham, are ready and
various constitutionally secured freedoms.
The Federal Bill of Rights guarantees free- willingto sacrifice their little Isaacs as a sign
dom of speech, freedom of religion, and of religious devotion. But unlike Abraham,
freedom of the press - to name but a few of who is reported to have had second thoughts
in the matter and spared his son at the last
its guarantees. But none of these freedoms
minute, a number of Ohioans have felt they
is absolute or without bounds. All freedoms
must be balanced against one another, and had to equal the "faith" of the biblical judge
Jephthah who actually sacrificed his daughone man's freedoms must be weighed
ter to his god.
against the freedoms of his fellows. Justice
In Western religious tradition, children
Holmes stated in a famous dictum that
freedom of speech does not extend to falsely traditionally have been viewed as chattels
to be shaped and molded accrying "fire!" in a crowded theater. It is also -objects
accepted that freedom of the press does not cording to the neuropsychiatric biases reextend to the printing of libel. And - until I sponsible for the theological opinions held
moved to Ohio several years ago - I by their parents. Only with the relaxing of
religion's grip upon Western civilization have
thought it was common understanding that
freedom of religion did not extend to the we come to see that the child has rights of his
own, and that the state has a legitimate
performance of child sacrifice.
But to my shock, child sacrifice as a interest in the protection of children against
religious right would appear, de facto, to be abuse and mistreatment by their parents. If
parents want to handle rattlesnakes as a
legal in the State of Ohio. Both when reading
the statutes and when reading the news- religious act, that is their own look-out. But if
papers this impression is confirmed. We parents expect their five-year old children to
do it, the state cannot be indifferent. The
need not recount the particular recent cases
of children dying for their parents' faith. state must save the children.
These have been well documented by the
media, and the legislature doubtless has
House Bill No. 67
more details than I do. It is sufficient for our
purposes simply to note that the principle of
One of the most shocking features of the
religious freedom has been perverted: In relevant sections of the Revised Code is the
Ohio the religious "freedom" of parents has repeated use of the phrase "in accordance
with the tenets of a well-recognized relibeen extended to the point where their
children have none at all. The dead know gion." This phrase is prima facie in violation
of the no-establishment clause of the First
nothing of freedom.
Judging from the published remarks last Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. It is
unconstitutional because it attempts to
December of Sen. Lee Fisher of Cleveland,
create by law a hierarchy of religions: "recthe religious freedom of parents is thought
to be essentially without bounds. If parents . ognized" or officially sanctioned religions,
believe they can stop hemorrhage in a child's and "unrecognized" or illegitimate religions.
Now it is neither the duty nor the right of
severed limb by prayer, the state is to stand
by reverently watching and, after the child is government to judge the legitimacy or truth
of any religion. Nor is it legal for government
dead, do no more than to cluck consolingly
that the trials of faith are often arduous and to establish religion in general in a position
May, 1985
American Atheist
Sec. 2151.421
This section of the law requires various
official and professional persons to report
suspected cases of child abuse or neglect.
There is a problem in this section which is
rather peculiar in that it provides a loop-hole
with which adherents of one particular religious sect may avoid compliance.
Lines 2.35, et seq., continuing the list of
responsible persons, include any "person
rendering spiritual treatment through prayer in accordance with the tenets of a well-
Austin, Texas
May, 1985
Page 7
ally defensible and socially responsible solution of the problems involving the religious
abuse of children. If there are any questions
concerning my testimony, or if I can be of
further help, please ask me now or at any
time in the future.
VIA ATHEISM
Webster's New Collegiate Dictionary, "via - 1: by way of, 2: through the medium of, 3: by means of'
On May 6, 1925 an event occurred which
would make a difference to American Atheism in our times: Arnold Via was born. The
squawking, red-faced brat began immediately to set up his howls in the world, and fortunately for all of us - he has never quit
American Atheists is very pleased to honor
Arnold Via on his day of birth and to tell the
world that we are happy that he is one of us.
Those of you who do not know Arnold Via
are missing something, but you can find out
a little about him by reading feature articles
in prior American Atheist magazines: "Action Atheist: Arnold Via" which appeared in
the December, 1978 (Vol. 20, No_ 12) issue,
"Viva Via" in the February, 1980 (Vol. 22,
No.2) issue, "Prison Atheist League of
America Challenges Religious Influence in
America's Prisons" in the April, 1983 (Vol.
25, No.4) issue, and "The Recycling of An
Atheist" in the October, 1983 (Vol. 35, No.
10)issue. He was featured on the front cover
of the February, 1980, issued under the title
"Our man in Virginia" but, actually, he
would be "our man" anywhere in the world.
Via has worked long, hard, and arduously
for the concept of Atheism and poured his
own money into what he has advocated for
more years than he cares to admit His most
recent magnanimous act was to drive from
Grottoes, Virginia, to Austin, Texas, to
spend two weeks on the repair of the roof of
The American Atheist Center. Characteristically, almost as an aside, he finished establishing the first Chapter of PALA (prison
Atheist League of America) in a federal
penitentiary while in Texas. Heretofore, he
has had his efforts focused on the state
prison systems. In the Bastrop, Texas, Federal Penitentiary, situated thirty miles east of
Austin, Texas, Hugh Dalton battled for two
and one-half years to establish.the Chapter,
recognized finally by the Warden on February 13th, 1985. And Via was in attendance
for the first meeting.
Arnold Via's first involved fight for Atheism began in 1976 with the issuance of his
Page 8
group, however, was more severely restricted in its activity than any other group in
the prison.
Again and again, Arnold has hit the newspapers, television, and radio in Virginia, in
his one-man campaign to wake up the state.
His hard-hitting monthly Newsletter was
mailed across the state to every Atheist he
could shock out of the closet. By May, 1981,
he was involved in a heavy legal fight to force
the Richmond Public Library to accept and
display the American Atheist magazine. In
June, 1981, he decided to picket Falwell's
Thomas Road Baptist Church, and with
twenty-seven members of his Chapter he
showed up with a crucified frog on a small
cross, on which the legend ran "He died for
our sins."
On June 6, the Virginia State Prison
system refused to permit the inmate who
was writing a newsletter for the prisoners to
send such a Newsletter to any other inmates, notifying that such mail was returned
"unauthorized" since the penal institution
permitted correspondence only ifthere "is a
family or codefendant relationship" between
prisoners.
But on November 17, 1981, meanwhile,
Via recieved an award from the State of
Virginia for his volunteer work with the
prisoners at Staunton Correctional Center,
near his residence. He works hard and well,
carrying his convictions into action again
and again.
June of 1982 is another example, for in
that month alone he had appeared on two
television interviews and four radio call-in
shows and in six newspapers, often making
May, 1985
Page 9
~o
VIrgInIa
0 ~
ATH-EST
o
American Atheist
Austin, Texas
&;~~(J;9?JeJk
existence of some imaginary being who
requires people to worship him, then tell me,
how I should worship him?" Should he, the
Dying Man asks the Priest, "follow the
daydreams of Confucius or the absurdities
of Brahma; perhaps I should bow to the
Great Snake God of the African Blacks; or
should I pray to the Sun God of the Peruvians; maybe the god of Moses is the correct
one; or do you suggest that I follow Mohammedanism; which Christian sect is the right
one? ... be reasonable," the Dying Man
admonishes the Priest, "your Jesus is no
better than Mohammed, Mohammed no
better than Moses, and the three of them
combined no better than Confucius, who
May, 1985
Page 11
Page 12
May, 1985
American Atheist
Christianity Evaluated
God Evaluated
Bressac scorns Christianity. As the Enlightenment progressed, Christianity, especially Catholicism, came under increasing
vilification, and Sade was one of the most
extreme blasphemers. He calls Jesus a
"worthless Jew, the child of a whore and a
soldier ... born in a filthy barn, yet he had
the cheek to masquerade as the son of the
creator of the universe." The disciples are
described as "intellectually bovine teenagers" who were probably homosexuals.
Bressac tries to enlist Justine in his plot to
murder his aunt by offering her a fortune,
but she refuses. In spite of Justine's attempts to save her, the aunt is murdered by
her nephew. Justine is subsequently captured by Bressac, tied up in a forest, attacked by three dogs owned by him while he
watches with his lover, and left to fend for
herself.
During her wandering, she happens upon
a Benedictine monastery "occupied by four
lonely monks of renowned faith." In reality,
they are among the most debauched creatures in all of literature. During one of the
intermezzi in the sexual circus, one of the
licentious priests lectures Justine that a
person's character and desires are formed in
the womb; thus education is incapable of
changing them. He describes people as
rapacious beasts, comparable to the tiger or
the leopard. "Ask the lamb," he continues,
"why it exists, and it will tell you that it
doesn't understand why the wolf eats it. Ask
the wolf why the lamb exists, and he will
answer that the lamb lives to be food for him.
Austin, Texas
May, 1985
contemptible thing?"
The baroness asks Justine to aid her in a
crime, and Justine agrees, but only to save
the victim. Her efforts, of course, fail. More
problems beset her, including threatened
decapitation, but she escapes. Then, in a
burning building, she tries to save an infant
from death; but she trips, the child accidentaly falls from her hands and is burnt to
death. She is immediately grabbed and flung
into a carriage; there is a woman in the
carriage; it is Dubois. Justine has been
returned to the hands of her enemy. "Well,"
the baroness asks, "what do you think of
Christianity now?" Dubois instructs her that
"your God is nothing but an hallucination.
you find a concept of God in the minds of the
deranged. The only function of this hallucination is to deceive people and create wars
between them. The greatest service a person could have rendered humanity would
have been to cut the throat of the first
person who spoke the word 'God.'"
In spite of her innocence and virtue,
Justine is arrested for setting fire to the
house where the child died. As if in a
nightmare, she is surreptitiously taken from
the prison to a chateau, and in many convoluted scenes, she meets some of the
monsters who have tormented her. All have
prospered; she, of course, is brutally assaulted. "Good God in Heaven above," she
laments, "why don't I receive the slightest
kindness from You? I am awash in a sea of
evil!Why is it that this God, Whom Iworship
so fervently, punishes me, but He rewards
with wealth and happiness those people who
have defiled and debauched me?"
Reunion
Suddenly, Justine meets Madame de
Lorsange, and they both learn that they are
the orphaned sisters. Lorsange is now a
woman of incredible wealth. She and her
husband secure Justine's pardon from the
king, who nullifies all legal proceedings
against her, silences the newspapers which
have attacked her, and gives her a royal
pension of a thousand crowns a year.
Lorsange and her husband take Justine to
their luxurious country estate. There is a
storm. Madame de Lorsange is terrified by
the wind and lightning, and she begs Justine
to close the shutters. Anxious to help her,
Justine "runs to the windows, which are
already being broken; she fights to close
them, but the wind is too strong and she is
driven back to the center of the room - and
then a bolt of lightning strikes her - it hits
her in the right breast, goes to her heart, and
explodes in her abdomen. God! What a
miserable, hideous thing to see." Such is the
reward of virtue.
The story of the Countess de Lorsange is
quite quickly told, although Juliette is a
longer novel than Justine. Sade summarizes
Page 13
performed by the inmates including, sometimes, Sade. He invited leading figures of the
Parisian theater as well as socialites and
businessmen to see the performances; it
was considered quite an honor to be invited
to them and an even greater one to have
dinner with him in his room. These productions were quashed by an administrative
zealot.
The Marquis de Sade, "the divine Marquis" as one scholar called him, died quietly
on December 2, 1814. His concepts about
human nature and ethics continue to stimulate COl itroversy, and this intellectual excitement is exactly the way it should be for
Atheists. Sade saw the need to eradicate
godism from human existence, but he was
one of the few who recognized that ifgodism
is rejected, then the ethical structure based
upon it must also be rejected. How, then,
should morality be reconstituted from the
rubble of Christianity? Sade wanted an
ethical system founded on the realities of life
and human nature, not on the basis of some
mythical deity. Ethics, to him, should be
based on reason, not on the self-interest of a
gold-mitered prelate or a richly-bedecked
king. The integration of reason and ethics
can be gained by giving up the ignorant belief
in an afterlife, the debasement before robe
and ring, and the rejection of reason and
learning for wine and wafer.
Well may some Atheists reject the concepts of the Marquis de Sade, but these
Atheists would be well advised to remember
one of the lessons of the Enlightenment:
Think clearly and reasonably. The same for
those who agree with him - do not blindly
follow. There has been enough of that in
Western culture! Sade's lasting contribution
to Western thought is that he argued that all
of the Judeo-Christian teachings, rationale,
theology, ethics - all of it - must be
rejected and then there must be a new
Renaissance
of science, materialism,
Atheism. The controversial Marquis de Sade
is a part of that "rebirth of learning."
IMPI
A Decline
Sade continued to write while in prison,
but his work never regained the quality of
Justine; even Juliette shows marked signs of
Sade's decline as a master of the "philosophical story" because he began to repeat
his philosophy without marked effect. From
1806-1807, he worked on The Days of
Florbelle, or Nature Unmasked, Followed
by the Memories of the Abbe de Modose
and the Adventures of Emilie de Volnange
(Les Journees de Florbelee, Ou La Nature
Devoilee, Suivies des Memoires de L 'Abbe
de Modose et des Adventures d'Emilie de
Volnange). Little more than a month passed
after he had finished the work when the
police raided his room and confiscated several manuscripts among which was The
Days of Florbelle. These texts were burned
after his death at the request of his family.
He wrote a very long novel, The Marquise
de Gange (1813), which is a feeble, philosophic Gothic tale of the faithful wife being
brutally harassed by her villainous husband.
His short stories are of little interest and his
plays are of even less stature. In both genres
he had turned to trivial, hackneyed plots as
well as those focusing on historical figures, a
subject which keenly interested him. His
creativity, however, was directed to producing plays at the mental hospital at Charenton (c. 1803-1810). These plays were
Page 14
American Atheist
Stephen B. Thorne
JESSE ON MY MIND
a dream the other night that I thought
IIhadshould
share. Well, it seems that a
famous theme park in Southern California
was 'becoming too secular for a Baptist
senator from North Carolina. He decided to
ask a millionconservatives to buy stock in its
parent company and give it a more proper
focus on the world. There would be no more
Tomorrowland with its praise of the false
doctrine of science. Frontierland didn't put
enough emphasis on the work of the religious pilgrims of the past, and as for New
Orleans Square, well, you know what sin
goes on down there during Mardi Gras!
These good folks set about their task of
redeeming this playground of the evil Secular Humanists without delay and the park
was soon reopened for business. Surprisingly,few people showed up for opening day.
Some berry farm nearby was drawing the
lost souls of the area to it in record numbers.
In my dream, Iwent to the renovated park to
see what damage had been done.
The first change that I saw as I went
through the turnstiles was that the famous
mouse had been replaced by blooming flowers planted to form the image of some man
nailed to a cross with red flowers coming out
of his side. "Some amusement park," I
thought as I entered.
As I walked down the main (and only)
street leading away from the entrance, I
noticed that the shops were no longer candy
and film shops but were now bookstores
specializing in only one book! What ever
happened to diversification, I wondered as I
went along. On my right was a special free
attraction. The marquee read "Great Moments with William Jennings Bryan." I was
going to go in, but I noticed a surly-looking
man in a five-hundred-dollar suit at the door
with a gold plate for a "love offering" and
thought better of it. As I went along, I heard
some delighted squeals of praise up ahead
and the pace of the crowd quickened to see
what was the matter. Well, it was the Virgin
Mary and the Twelve Dwarfs, er, Apostles
waving and asking folks if they were saved.
"Saved from what," I wondered, seeing no
apparent danger around me.
One of my favorite places in the old park
was the big castle in the center of the place. I
always used to look very closely to try to see
Tinkerbell. Imagine my disappointment
when I saw, instead of some empty fairy's
Austin, Texas
May, 1985
Page 15
like miniature arks, only with big glass observation panels in the sides so that we could all
see. We pushed off and went through a
rainfall area while the tour guide, who was
dressed like Noah, told us about the forty
days and forty nights of rain and so on. Our
next stop was at the Red Sea where we saw
the water part, Jews cross, and Egyptian
soldiers drown. After this, we saw Jonah
swallowed by a whale and Jesus Christ walk
on water. We next went to a jungle area and
saw a missionary with some natives. I
thought that I saw some soldiers raping
native women through the trees, but dismissed this as my imagination. Finally, we
returned to Mt. Ararat and disembarked.
I left the ride and passed the Holy War
Shooting Gallery where various infidels were
targets. I came closer to the gallery to get a
IMPI
.~.
Page 16
May, 1985
American Atheist
Fred Woodworth
Austin, Texas
this obsession to ignore the rights of fellowhuman beings, and in their zeal, to force
conformity by all to the moral code that they
have received from either the Bible or texts
of extreme anti-individualism.
Thanks to the unhealthy coalition of extremists, many intellectual and personal
choices are beginning to come down to mob
rule by the prudes, censors, and bigots. Less
and less is it felt that one has the right to read
or write anything he or she chooses; instead,
everything needs to pass a review board of
balefully glaring inquisitors who think (or
claim that they think) people are liable to go
out and emulate whatever they find on the
printed page. If that belief is true, then
literature is in for a rough time, because in
general it contains more and worse depictions throughout its length and breadth than
the little backwater of porn ever will.How do
we know that reading Shakespeare's scene
might not induce someone to pour poison
into another's ear? Ifreading a description of
a rape will cause an individual (a male of
course) to think of raping someone, why
doesn't a scene of robbery. in a play influence
somebody to become a stick-up man?
The old-time Puritans, it will be recalled,
deplored fiction - all fiction - for precisely
this reason. For hundreds of years, in fact,
literature had to have a "moral"; otherwise it
would lead readers astray from the path of
righteousness.
Oddly in line with the concept of doublethink is the attitude of the modern attempted censor, vis-a-vis freedom to print,
read, and think. As always, everybody's in
favor of "freedom of the press," though if
you listen closely over a long enough time,
you wait to hear the but that comes along in
a second: "Sure, I believe totally in freedom
ofthe press, but. .. ", "Freedom is a precious
right, but . . ." etc. but - always but.
Following the but is the individual's real
statement, which in every case reduces the
former to a subordinate idea (ifnot clause):
"But it has to be exercised responsibly"
(meaning: in a way of which I approve); "But
the press must serve the public good" (what
I conceive of as good).
Some of the latest antics of the international opposition to pornography recently
were seen in the city where I live. In proud
May, 1985
Page 17
Page 18
May, 1985
American Atheist
Lowell Newby
BORN OF WATER
following entry appeared in my
TheMississippi
Educational Television
Austin, Texas
May, 1985
Page 19
AUGUST BERKSHIRE
W 1Jv11 ~
4
qd
HAl
WI
BIRTI
MINNI
CHAf
nm
~py
tDAY
~SOTA
ITER
bers. Similarly, the main page of our Newsletter is printed on a very attractive golden
buff colored paper for twenty dollars, which
we could have done for free if we wanted
plain, white paper.
We have also had the good fortune to
have had three people become Life members this past year, which added $750 to our
treasury. Then again, these people became
Lifers largely because they enjoyed our local
meetings and wanted to support our Chapter.
Chores
The success of the Twin Cities Chapter is
the combined efforts of all its volunteers.
From the beginning our Chapter duties were
spread out so that no one person would get
overworked and "burnt out."
As Director, Ihave been the officialspokesperson for our group. I have been interviewed by newspaper and television. I also
write our monthly Newsletter, as well as
most of our Dial-An-Atheist scripts and
many "Letters to the Editor." I call new
people and also oversee all Chapter activities.
Tom Parish, Vice-Director of our Chapter, has taken over when I have been out of
Austin, Texas
Page 21
June 9, 1984: Six Chapter members volunteer to answer phones for a local PBS
television auction. (Credit was given on the
air.)
June 23,1984: Summer Solstice Picnic held
at Minnehaha Park.
August 6, 1984: Dial-An-Atheist begins
operation.
August 19, 1984: Seven Chapter members.
volunteer to answer phones for a PBS
pledge drive. (Credit was given on the air.)
August 19, 1984: A one-minute interview,
featuring Chapter Director August Berkshire, appears on WTCN (channel 11) TV
Evening News announcing the new Dial-AnAtheist service.
September 1984: Twin Cities Chapter Tshirts designed and sold for $8.00 each.
September 23,1984: Fall Equinox Picnic
held at Minnehaha Park (attendance - 20).
October 7, 1984: Chapter officers reelected to full year term. (attendance - 18)
The 1984-85 Twin Cities Chapter officers (left to right): Shirley Moll (Secretary),
Cora Wheeler (Treasurer), August Berkshire (Director), Tom Parish (Vice Director), Kevin Hardisty (National Liaison Officer).
Page 22
May, 1985
of
American Atheist
POETRY
To be alive!
To see,
a flower;
To smell,
a pine forest;
To taste,
a kiss;
To experience wonder,
Austin, Texas
Tom James
May, 1985
Lowell Newby
Page 23
Page 24
May, 1985
American Atheist
The Villain
Our typical biology professor (Fig. 3),
however, is a closed-minded, short-tempered buffoon. He is pot-bellied, bald, and
wears pince-nez glasses. As can be seen
from his hands - which are trying to
strangle the air - evolutionists are a violent
and thoroughly unpleasant lot. Again we see
the ad hominem abusive species fallacy. If
we were to call someone a short-tempered,
closed-minded slob, it would be no worse
than this graphic portrayal.
I have already noted that the ad hominem
fallacy also comes in what is known as the
"circumstantial species" In this form we
attack our opponent, not by calling him
names, but by appealing to special circumstances of his personal situation - hence
the term 'circumstantial.' To see/how this
circumstantial species of ad hominem attack
is employed in this comic book, we need to
consider who the expected reader of the
book is likely to be.
In most cases, the reader will be young,
white, Protestant, and lower middle-class.
He or she is unlikely to be overburdened by
excessive education. Keeping this in mind,
and remembering that the comic first appeared in the early seventies, let's reexamine
the three figures to look for the circumstantial fallacy
In the case of the class portrait, we see
people who represent everything our reader
has been taught to fear. Suzy Sympathizer
will suggest not only left-wing politics but
sexual promiscuity as well. The unclean
acid-freak will remind the reader that one
toke (!) on a marijuana cigarette will addict
him, and lead to a life of violent crime. The
typical reader can be expected to fear drugs
and the drug culture. Hence, he will be
against evolution if druggies are for it!
It was a propaganda genius who thought
to put a black militant with an Afro hairdo in
the front row. We can expect the typical
reader to be afraid of Blacks who" don't stay
in their proper place." This frame willappeal
to the reader's fear that Blacks are trying to
take over America and have even infiltrated
our colleges. Enlisting the aid of racial prejudice against the theory of evolution may be
a stroke of apologetic genius, but it is hitting
below the belt.
The appeal to circumstance in this frame,
then, can be seen as an attempt to associate
evolution with everything the typical reader
may be expected to fear and distrust. This is
simultaneously the fallacy of 'guilt by association.'
Reexamining the hero of our book, we see
an appeal to special circumstance - Pat
Boone types are greatly admired by people
such as the typical reader might be. The
hero is polite, white, clean-cut, and brave.
Austin, Texas
FANATIC!!
HOW ~~{g
THE WORD BIBLE
YOU KNOW
UNCONSTITUTIONAL! ---
ITS
D~ YOU TALK
DO YOU
UNDERSTAND?
Fig. 3 A typical response of a typical biology professor after being chaUenged on the
subject of evolution.
1972 by Jack T. Chick
"For the wisdom of this world is foolishness
with God." Thus, part of the circumstantial
appeal of this frame is to the anti-intellectualism of the hypothetical reader.
But we have in this frame also an appeal to
another circumstance of the typical reader:
the circumstance that he probably thinks
-like President Reagan - that the Supreme
Court ruled it illegalto pray in school. He will
believe the text to be correct when it says, as
quoted here, "I could have you jailed for
that! How dare you even mention the word
Bible in this school- you know it's unconstitutional!"
Of course, the Supreme Court never said
. any such thing. What it ruled out of bounds
was school-enforced oral prayer and bible
Downgrading Education
reading as devotional exercises. It never outOne of the first Bible verses our typical lawed truly voluntary prayer or the nonreader will have memorized is 1 Cor. 3:19, reverential academic study of the Bible and
May, 1985
Page 25
other scriptures. This frame can be expected to arouse the more paranoid fundamentalists who see everywhere the unfolding of a "secular humanist" plot to obliterate
religion by governmental fiat. The conspiracy theme is reinforced in a frame where
our born-again McCarthyite stands up, waving a "chart showing some amazing findings
which are rarely made public!" The invited
HEIDELBERG MAN
AtISTAALQPITllfCUS
inference is that the wicked humanist evolutionists have been suppressing the truths of
paleontology in order to overthrow the
Christian world-order and the county government.
Upgrading Force
Among the other fallacies of informal logic
to be found in Big Daddy is the argumentum
ad baculum - the appeal to force. "Agree
with me, or you'll get yours," is the underlying message in this fallacy. At the end of
the booklet, when the hero has taken over
the class, one of the students worriedly asks
him, "What if I don't believe this and die what then?" To this our hero replies, ''Then
you'll die in your sins and be eternally lost."
This is our old friend, the threat of hell-fire
and damnation. We need only recall that
neither logically nor morally does might
make right.
One finalfallacy we may note is the 'strawman' argument. Here one decisively overthrows an argument which isn't actually
supported by his opponent. When our hero
observes that scientists are less than perfect
in their knowledge, he ignores the fact that
science has never claimed absolute knowledge of anything. His exposure of Nebraska
Man as being nothing more than the tooth of
an extinct pig is presented in such a way as
to make the reader suppose Nebraska Man
was a critical pillar in the temple of evolutionary theory. In point of fact, almost no
scientists of my acquaintance have ever
heard of Nebraska Man - still less do they
base any hypotheses upon this man of
straw. I will discuss the interesting case of
Nebraska Man in the second installment of
this article.
Comparative Centerfolds
As it happens Big Daddy also has a similar
center-fold. Actually, Big Daddy has part of
the same center-fold. As readers may be
aware, creationists love to cite the Second
Law of Thermodynamics to the effect that
the universe is running down, not up, and
,ADVANCED
AUSTAAI
"f'ITHECUS
PEKING MAN
1972 by Jack T. Chick
Origins
NEBRASKA MAN
PAAANTHROPUS
Page 26
May, 1985
HOMO
PllTDOWN
fflECTUS
MAN
American Atheist
Austin, Texas
May, 1985
Page 27
DIGITIZING DESTINY
ne topic which never fails to rouse
strong feelings in our local press is any
O
challenging of the infallibilityof astrology. An
article I wrote based on material from the
Astronomical Society of the Pacific was
attacked on the charge that "Western science" does not apply to us and those who
think so exhibit a slavish mentality.
Once more, the final argument of the
pundits is that the truth is hidden in the most
ancient texts and that only scholars of
Sanskrit and other dead languages can
really understand it. Hindu astrology alone is
absolutely reliable.
All arguments on this silly subject start
with the profound statement "Astrology is a
science." Almost all Indian newspapers and
periodicals carry astrology columns. The
Indian Rationalist Association has tried in
vain to persuade editors to stop the practice.
Our protests have gone unheard and our
letters have never been published.
Most editors agree that the astrological
predictions are what make their publication
sell. But there are also a small number of
excellent papers which do not carry columns and have no problem with circulation.
Nevertheless, there are people who will
buy five or six papers for these forecasts
only. We also have a booming business in
almanacs traditionally brought out from famous centers by Brahmin priests. These
provide guidance for daily, hourly, and minute by minute routines on when to travel by
train, when not to go east, west, north, or
south, when to launch a new venture, and
much else. It is said that the swearing-in of
some of Rajiv Gandhi's cabinet ministers
was delayed because the time chosen was
inauspicious for the gentlemen.
My next article willbe on astrology and its
significance in the government of this country.
I believe we have the only college of
astrology in the world. It was inaugurated
during the prime ministership of the superstitious Morarji Desai, better known for his
positive views on urine therapy.
Most popular astrologers, writing in English, follow the western system of signs. But
the Hindu system, where signs are determined by the movement of the moon, is
regarded as better for more detailed predictions. The moon takes two and a half
days to transit each of the twelve signs;
Page 28.
hence the exact time of birth is very important. Since this detail isn't available to
newspaper astrologers obliged to forecast
the same fate for thousands of readers
under each birthsign, they also make predictions according to the first letter of people's names. For example, those born under
Leo (Si; lh) are likely to be given names
beginning with k, i. m and I.
Most papers, however, find it simpler to
follow the western system so that readers
need only look up their birthdays and signs
to know their fate for the coming week. One
of our Sunday supplements carries a column
by Peter Vidal from London. Readers are
unaware that he is dead and that the forecasts are made in his name by a syndicate. I
read somewhere that when the column
failed to arrive on time on more that two
occasions junior reporters sat down and
wrote up the forecasts.
Says one pundit" Astrology is more than a
science, because science is based on fixed
data, while here, the subject goes beyond
the laboratory and covers the general universe." This particular astrologer also writes
very popular scripts for comic books.
Says another pundit, "Astrology is an
open chart based totally on mathematical
calculations. There is no suspense at all in it.
It works like a computer."
According to a third astrologer, the allegation that it is unscientific and based only
on "sixth sense", the "third eye", or "intuition" is false. "You are born at a particular
moment, when the moon is in a certain sign.
Counted from that, the transits, i.e., the
planetary configurations, appearing in the
Zodiac, are taken into account." This particular pundit has been doing newspaper
columns for thirty-six years.
But if you ask these profound thinkers
why forecasts differ so widely across the
length and breadth of this country or why
can't all of us master this "science", they
begin to bemoan the host of charlatans in
the business who are giving it a bad name.
"Nobody goes into things in depth," says
one. "The same priest who does the horoscopes, also performs ceremonies for birth,
death, and marriages on the same day - for
ten different families. Society is to blame for
this. It doesn't recognize astrology as it used
to do in ancient times. Newspaper forecasts
are nothing but exploitation. Even twins
May, 1985
American Atheist
that program."
Predictions come out in Indian-English
but use traditional terminology like "You will
have a lot of cows" which, in modern terms,
means you will flourish. Uranus, Neptune,
and Pluto are excluded, since the ancient
astrologers were unaware of them. Besides,
"other planets have had thousands of years
of charting behind them."
Professional astrologers approach them
with their predictions. If there is any divergence the man is made to see the error of his
ways and goes offfeeling foolish. Computers
can't lie. "We've had astrologers coming to
us from Delhi to settle disputes," says one
manager. "As far as calculations go the best
astrologer can't compare with us. What
we're saying is simple: Only God knows for
sure. But we are among the people next to
"
Him,
With that kind of sponsorship, digitized
forecasting is going to make serious inroads
on traditional preserves and challenge the
poets and intuitionists now earning their
bread by making suckers of us. For the sake
of novelty, a number of newspapers will
soon start dishing up computerized forecasts. This willsend a lot of respected sages
into the wilderness.
What are the gravest charges against
digitized astrology?
It makes no allowance for essentially
human factors like soul, presentiment, or
intuition. One of the most widely read as-
"In India at least," declares the poet-cumconman who functions largely on intuition,
"the astrologer is the therapist. While there
are a few bad eggs, there are quite a few
astrologers not lacking in integrity, understanding, patience, knowledge, skills and
basic psychology, out to heal, and many
times succeeding in this mission. Oyotishi
(Astrology) means the light of God and for
that we need the divine element, and that,
surely, cannot be supplied by the computer.
The reading, therefore, cannot be totally
fulfillingfrom the human viewpoint."
In other words, brother, there are more
ways than one of parting fools from their
money. And who should know better than
old pros like us?
IMPI
hi the
m--I-
D_I_A_L-_A_N_-_A_T_H_E_IS_T_I __
tR
The telephone listings below are the various services where you may listen to short comments on state/church separation
issues and viewpoints originated by the Atheist community.
Tucson, Arizona
San Francisco, California
South Bay (San Jose), California
Denver, Colorado
South Florida
Atlanta, Georgia
Northren Illinois
Des Moines, Iowa
Lexington, Kentucky
Boston, Massachusettes
Detroit, Michigan
Minneapolis/St. Paul, Minn.
Albuquerque, New Mexico
Austin, Texas
(602) 623-3861
(415) 668-8085
(408) 377-8485
(303) 692-9395
(305) 925-7167
(404) 455-8860
(312) 335-4648
(515) 266-6133
(606) 278-8333 .
(617) 969-2682
(313) 721-6630
(612) 566-3653
(505) 884-7360
May, 1985
(518) 346-1479
(702) 972-8203
(614) 294-0300
(405) 677-4141
(503) 771-6208
(412) 734-0509
THE-ATHEIST_(512)
458-5731
(713) 664-7678
(713) 527-9255
(801) 364-4939
(703) 280-4321
Page 29
HISTORICAL NOTES
100 Years Ago ...
The Truth Seeker of one hundred years
ago reflects a continuing activity on behalf of
what it describes as "liberalism." Issued
weekly in New York City as a sixteen-page
tabloid-size newspaper, much of the reporting was of organizational activity, coincident with lecturing. In city after city, spokespersons were welcomed by the mayor and
had lengthy exchanges with leading politicians including state and federal representatives and senators. There were five issues
of the Truth Seeker printed in May, 1885,
and the activity during this spring or early
summer month is typical.
Samuel P. Putnam and Charles Watts
were lecturing in the West under the auspices of the American Secular Union. Robert
G. Ingersoll was then president of the National Liberal League, Watts was Vice President, and Putnam was Secretary. The League was headquartered at 33 Clinton Place,
in New York City.
The lecturers were greated with much
sympathy in Liberal, Missouri, which had
been founded as an "infidel" town. The
editor of the local newspaper and the owners
of the National Hotel escorted the speakers
and entertained them. The newspaper
write-ups were highly complimentary. Mr.
Putnam's talks were on "The Demands of
Humanity" and "The New Heaven and
Earth" while those of Watts' were on "Secularism and Christianity" and "The Aims and
Methods of Liberalism." The lectures, which
lasted two days, found capacity audiences.
The series was repeated in Ft. Scott,
Wichita, and Dodge City. In the latter town
the Opera House was filled to hear the
atheist speakers and the reception was so
warm that Putnam and Watts stayed an
extra day to deliver additional addresses.
The schedule was grueling - April 25th to
27th in Kansas City, Missouri; May 3rd in
Chicago, Illinois;May 10th in Grand Rapids,
Michigan; May 12th and 13th in Springport,
Michigan; May 14th in Sturgis, Michigan;
May 15th at Auburn, Indiana; May 24th in
Louisville, Kentucky; May 28th in Nashville,
Tennessee; May 29th at Cleveland, Ohio;
May 31st at Alliance, Ohio; June 7th at
Canton, Ohio; June 21st at Pittsburgh,
Pennsylvania; and June 28th at Salamanca,
New York. It was not uncommon at all to
have 1000 to 1,600 attendees at such lectures. It was necessary to end the series at
Albany, New York where they were to meet
with Robert G. Ingersoll and Elizabeth Cady
Stanton at the Freethought Convention of
1885 in that city. It should be remembered
that this type of lecture circuit riding was
undertaken when the major form of transportation was by train or horse carriage.
In Dodge City, the sheriff of the county
Page 30
May, 1985
American Atheist
n the date of the writing of this program, Iam to appear on a radio confronO
tation with a gentleman who declares that he
has discovered the Ark of Noah. It seems to
be a propitious time, therefore, to cover
some "Absurdities in the Ark and Flood
Story," as given by Kersey Graves in his
book, The Bible of Bibles, written about a
hundred years ago.
He states:
If there were no other errors or
absurdities in the Bible, our faith in it
would diminish at every step in the
investigation of the ark and flood story
as related in the sixth chapter of
Genesis. The avowed purpose of the
flood, the means employed, and their
failure to accomplish the end desired,
are all at war with our reason and our
moral sense.
1. The first question that naturally
arises in considering this story is, Why
should so many millions of innocent
beings - men, women, children, animals, birds, etc. - perish as a penalty
for the sins of a few thousand people?
2. The reason given for this wholesale destruction was the wickedness
and moral depravity of the human
race. But is it true that the whole
human race was in that state at that
period? According to Manetho and
Herodotus, Egypt was in a state of
high civilization and moral culture ...
China was also far advanced in the
arts of civilization and in morality ...
India (was) in a similar condition.
There could, therefore, be no justice
in drowning all these nations in order
to punish a few thousand rambling
Jews ...
3. An enlightened moralist of the
present day would decide that it was a
species of injustice to destroy all the
land animals, and let the fishes and
aquatic animals live. It looks like partiality ...
Austin, Texas
May, 1985
Page 31
fiftyboys in providing leaves and flowers (if there were any possibility that
they could be obtained while merged
in twenty-seven feet of water) for the
animals that feed on these things.
21. Besides food, fresh water must
have been stored up for most of these
animals, as they could not have endured the salty water of the briny
deep.
22. Noah and his family must have
studied ornithology and natural history many years to know what kind of
food to save for the various kinds of
birds and animals.
23. Naturalists estimate that there
are fourteen different climates, each
with animals adapted only to the temperature and natural growth of that
locality. How, then, could they all
endure the change of being removed
to the vicinity of Mount Ararat. ...
24. And think of the immense labor
required to obtain this innumerable
collection of animals! In the first place,
either Noah or his God must make a
trip to the polar regions to obtain the
white bear, the reindeer, the polar
dog, etc.
25. And then the Rocky Mountains
must be scaled to find and catch the
grizzly bear. Some time and labor
must have been required to obtain the
rattlesnakes, copperheads, vipers, cobras, snapping turtles, etc., of the
torrid zone ...
27. To do all this hunting and catching, and conveying to the ark, of the
million and a half birds and animals,
would have required a larger number
of persons than Napoleon or Xerxes
ever commanded; for, as the whole
thing is related as a natural occurrence, we can not assume that they
made the journey of their own accord
29. And how could this immense
multitude of respiring and perspiring
animals live and breathe in a vessel
with but one little twenty-two-inch
window, and that in the third story,
and shut up most of the time to keep
the rain out ... How could they be
kept thus for a whole year without
breeding pestilence and death?
30. All animals require light; and
total darkness must have reigned in
the two lower stories ...
32. We are told that "fifteen cubits
upward did the water prevail, and the
mountains were covered." Fifteen cu. bits (twenty-seven feet) would not
cover nine-tenths of the buildings now
on earth. Ararat is seventeen thousand feet, and Everest twenty-nine
thousand feet high ...
34. Who or what conducted the ark
Page 32
May, 1985
American Atheist
"
"
" will, I
Thehope,titlerelayof tothisyouarticle,
specifically the area
Austin, Texas
May, 1985
"
universe, including, of course, ourselves.
Physicists talk about "space-time,"
about how there really isn't any
"things," that each "thing" so called is
really an "event" or "process." If
you've ever read any of the works of
Albert Einstein, the idea that "space"
is "curved" and that it can be warped
by the presence of matter shows that
the idea "nothing" is just a human
abstraction that may not have any
corollary in the real world. Space can
have properties, ergo it really isn't
"empty."
The "atomistic" or "mechanistic"
materialism of the nineteenth century
is not the "state of the art" view of
reality today. "Matter", i.e. atoms or
even the particles which make up
atoms revealed in the cyclotrons of
the high energy physicists, may just be
something which emerged or evolved,
naturally and spontaneously from a
deeper type of "material" reality so
strange that atheistic physical scientists may refer to it as "nothingness."
Just as "mind" evolved or emerged in
time from "life,"which in turn emerged
naturally and spontaneously from
"matter," matter in turn emerged from
-what? Nothingness, something that
is impossible to describe in terms of
matter, energy, and even space-time.
Knowledge, even for Atheists, is
never certain and neuer complete.
The problem is that the latest findings
of physics, the ultimate science, is
beyond anything we've thought of or
experienced before, so that even comprehensible language to describe it
needs to be invented. Just keep in
mind that the term nothingness used
by modern day physicists doesn't reference any mysticism, supernaturalism, or Platonian idealism. Ninety percent plus of physicists are Atheists,
i.e. materialists.
J. L.
In answer to his comments several things
might be helpful. First, for clarity, the standard dictionary definition of nothingness 1. The condition or quality of being nothing;
non-existence. 2. Insignificant.
Page 33
Page 34
May, 1985
American Atheist
Austin, Texas
May, 1985
Page 35
.BOOK REVIEWS
Religion on Capitol Hill
Myths and Realities
ing and relgion-saturated. The authors, however, felt the queries were almost secular.
by Peter L Benson and Dorothy L Williams
One example will suffice to show the
San Francisco, CA: Harper & Row
nature of the survey. Question number 49
224 pages, $11.95
was: Which, if any, of these religious experiences have you had? A legislator, knowing
that the survey is going to be released to the
public and will be seen by (religious) voters
in his home state or district is asked to make
his is a 5%" x 8~" hardback book,
which has been three years in the writ- one of s even choices in response:
A. The experience of having God
ing. Although this is advertised as a scholarly
speaking to me.
book, one must read through an amazing
B. The experience of feeling God's
amount of drivel in the first several chapters
as the authors set out, chatting informally, to
presence.
C. The experience of feeling one
advise of their reasons for writing the book,
how they determined to proceed, with whom
with Sod.
D. The experience of feeling united
they discussed the idea, how it was financed,
with the universe.
the approach to the U. S. Congress, and the
E. A born-again experience in which
sales techniques used to convince the test
Jesus entered my life.
sample subjects to participate in what is said
F. The experience of speaking in
to be a scientific sampling.
tongues.
It appears that "Search Institute" has
G. The experience of specific anexisted in Minneapolis, Minnesota for twenswer to prayer.
ty-three years. It is allegedly an independent,
Even ifone is assured that one's individual
non-profit research group, the purpose of
reply will not be identified, it would be
which is to explore the connections between
political suicide to make a response in conpeople's religious beliefs and their attitudes,
tradiction to the question. The researchers,
values, and behaviors. Since BillyGraham's
however, naively assured themselves that
organization is headquartered in Minneapothis could not happen since the questions
lis, when one reads this "scientific" survey
some questions immediately come to mind were so mundane, even innocuous from
their point of view. Naturally twenty-two
as to whether or not this is a thinly disguised
percent had heard God speak to them,
religious group using the "scientific method"
thirty percent had a born-again experience,
of research to reinforce existing JudeoChristian religious ideology, all under the and seventy-eight percent had felt God's
presence. Over eighty percent felt that the
innocuous pseudo-neutral name of "Search
Institute." The Lutheran Brotherhood and Bible was the word of God, and three
percent babbled in tongues (glossolalia).
the National Endowment for the Humanities
Other queries were simply sickening, as
were the primary donors for the project
undertaken, which was to inspect the im- the true-or-false choices for:
God works to protect and preserve
pact of their religious ideas upon the deciour social institutions and structures.
sions made by legislators in the federal
God has blessed America more
Congress.
than other nations.
Pointing out that only 535 men and womGod has a plan for my life.
en hold the power to set the laws and devise
There is not one Atheist in the United
the policies that govern daily life in the
United States, the authors, with a myriad of States who would NOT be able to predict
the outcome of the survey, another reinassistants (all dutifully mentioned and
thanked) picked a random sample of legis- forcement that "ours is a Christian nation."
The book could easily terrify Atheists,
lators to interview. A total of one hundred
particularly since it points out the almost
and twelve senators and representatives
insurmountable job ahead. Read it; you will
were chosen, of which eighty were actually
immediately triple your support of American
interviewed on tape for thirty-five minutes
each. Prior to the taping, a listing of fifty Atheists and throw yourself bodily, intellectually, and monetarily into the fight.
questions was offered to each interviewee.
All of these surveys, "scientific," popular,
From the answers, one hundred and twenty
four "units of information" related to specific or religious have one prime goal - to
convince each individual in the nation that if
beliefs were given scores, and from this the
he is not religious something is inherently
study was analyzed and conclusions drawn.
Thrity-two of the sample picked, that is, wrong with his personality and his head. It is
a call to the herd of believers, an attempt to
twenty-eight percent, declined to participate
intimidate, psychologically isolate, and bruin the survey. Upon reading the questions,
talize the Atheist.
one understands why there would by so
many refusals. By and large, they are insult-
Page 36
May, 1985
by Mark Green
New York: Dell Publishing Company
428 pages; $4.95
ME TOO
contention, are more inclined than are theists to become vegetarians. Atheists are
generally unafraid of "eating the fruit of the
tree of knowledge." They often pride themselves on their intellect and calim to understand their actions. They also claim to have
replaced arbitrary morality with ethics based
upon science and reasoning.
Judeo-Christians generally don't feel as
great a need to ponder the rightness of their
actions. Their faith in the moral authority of
the Bible precludes ethical reasoning. Atheists, on the other hand, don't have their own
little "book of answers." They instead either
follow traditional morality and rationalize
their behavior or search for ethical principles that are practical for daily living.
apparently works to the benefit of the natural order. Predators strengthen the prey
species by weeding out the sick and the
weak. Dominant males produce healthier
offspring by monopolizing the females.
Even though self-interest works for the
animal kingdom, it is not-an ethical principle
but actually just an observation of life.Ethics
imply choice, and one can hardly speak of a
wolf or a bear as being ethical or unethical
because they lack dietary choice.
Our situation is altogether different. Recent science has shown vegetarianism to be
healthy, and our technology has provided an
amazing variety of tasteful alternatives. No
longer are we in the position of primitive man
struggling to survive. We are now faced with
choosing between allowing animals a more
natural existence and causing them needless suffering in the oppressive conditions of
factory farms. (Those readers who still believe that animals are raised a la Old
McDonald in a wholesome environment
then killed painlessly should look into the
caging of hens and the anemic diet forced on
veal calves. The atrocities perpetrated upon
animals in the production of our food, as well
as in medical experimentations, surpass in
number and horror those inflicted upon
ourselves.)
Rationalizing
An Ethical Principle
Austin, Texas
May, 1985
~
- Jamie Massey
Texas
Page 37
Every easter I always get asked my opinion of the shroud of Turin. The story goes
that jesus's dark tomb was the camera, the
shroud was the film, and the heavenly light
from jesus' ressurection was the flash bulb.
Thus the shroud is a snapshot of jesus one
second before he rose from the dead. I
always say Ithink it's a fake like the Piltdown
man hoax. I wish I had some information on
the shroud which I could know to be unbiased. We Atheists need to discredit this
shroud because it's being used as "undeniable evidence" of the resurrection. I'd like
to hear what other Atheists think about the
shroud. Has it really passed all the scientific
tests for authenticity as is claimed?
Another area we need to delve more into
is the one-shot big bang theory . Too many
scientific people equate the one-shot big
bang with "god's creation." I favor the
oscillatinguniverse theory: big-bang-collapsebig-bang-collapse-big-bang-collapse, ad infinitum. This way there was never a beginning,
and matter/energy needs no creator. The
oscillating universe theory also helps defeat
probability arguments for goddism. Some
argue that 10 billionyears is not enough time
for enough random trials to have been made.
to produce something as unlikely as the
process of life. But with the oscillating universe theory, if necessary each big bang
could even be considered as a separate trial.
Speaking of probability I'd like to report
that I've had some good results lately in
making christians think just by flipping pennies. I shake three pennies around in my
hand and let them fall randomly on the
carpet. I do this over and over until they all
fallheads. then I say. "See, I very disorderdly
tossed these coins into the perfect order of
all heads. And what's more they fellthis way
without any help from god! If the law of
chance can cause a few disordered objects
to come into perfect order in a few trials
without 'divine help', then don't you think
that same law of chance can cause zillions of
objects or particles to come into perfect
order in zillions and zillions of trials, also
without god's help?" Then I simply say that
Page 38
Gerald Tholen is mistaken when he attacks the notion that matter can be created
May, 1985
American Atheist
Austin, Texas
C""~
NOTICE
"Letters to the Editor" must be either
questions or comments of general
concern to Atheists or Atheism.
Submissions should be brief and to the
point. Space limitations allow that each
letter should be two hundred words,
or preferably less. Please confine your
letters to a single issue only.
Mail them to:
American Atheists
PO Box 2117
Austin, TX 78768-2117
Thank you.
ATHEISM
AND
COUNTRY
(cont'd from pg. 4)
BillShawn
Utah
May, 1985
Page 39
CLASSIFIED ADVERTISEMENT
Organizations
AMERICAN ATHEIST
ADDICTION RECOVERY
GROUPS, Inc.
AMERICA's ONLY ALTERNATivE
to GOV.
BACKED AA, FAITH HEALING
(Killing)
Publishers of world's only
monthly newsletter for
alcoholics & other addicts;
their families and friends
Mem/Sub: 12 issues/$25
Sample 25 cents
AAARG, 2136 S. Birch St.
Denver, CO 80222
24-hr "warm line" (303) 758-6686
Rey Bourquin, of the Pittsburgh Chapter of American Atheists, has two "pretheocratic," U.S. twenty dollar bills. He
is offering these two Atheist collector's
items at a price of thirty dollars each.
Rey intends to donate the "profit" from
the sale of the bills to the American
Atheist Center Sustaining Trust Fund.
So hurry - get in touch with Rey before
they're both sold! Write to:
Rey Bourquin
PO Box 6637
Pitsburgh, PA 15212-6637
Publications
Classified Rates: 25 per word, $6.00
minimum. No boxes available.
Frequency Discount: (For classified) 10%
for three insertions, 20% for six.
Payment: Classified ads must be paid in
advance.
Publication policies: TheAmerican Atheist reserves the right to reject or cancel any
advertisement at any time for any reason.
No ad Jocacy advertising will be accepted.
Samples of products may be requested.
Tear -sheets of ads willbe sent to all clients.
We require street addresses for all advertisers using box numbers.
AMERICANGAVATHEISTS
PO Box 66711, Houston, TX 77266
PO Box 8644, Austin, TX 78712
PO Box 248, Vlg. Sta., NYC, NY10014
AGA membership is restricted to Atheists and
ONLY Atheists. Membership rate set at $10.00
per year by the Board of Directors.
DialaGayAtheist
.........
1&rIREADER SERVICE
SEND A GIFT SUBSCRIPTION!
To send a special gift subscription* of American
Atheist magazine, enter the name and address of the
recipient here:
.
Name __ ~~~------------------------------(Please Print)
Address
City
State,
.Zip_.
State,
o
o
o
o
_
_
_
State,
-LZip,
_
_
Page 40
THE MATCH !
The Apex of
Atheistic
Anarchism
City,
Zip,
PA. 18105
Address
City'
NUTRITION FORUM
(Please Print)
TO SUBSCRIBE TO AMERICAN
A THEIST MAGAZINE OR TO RENEW
YOUR PRESENT SUBSCRIPTION!
(713) 5279255
Bank Code'
Signature
Exp, Date,
_
Date
May, 1985
American Atheist
Order from:
$6.95
10.00
5.00
3.00
5.00
3.00
3.00
3.00
3.29
3.29
3.29
12.00
4.00
3.00
2.50
4.00
3.00
4.00
3.00
3.29
42.50
AMENDMENTI
<-
w.l
...J
C/)
.....,
~
~
>
w.l
ee
-::r:
r-
ir:
ir:
--<
C/)
o
>...J
I-
Z
.....,
o
'TJ
:A'
rn
--<
w.l
--<
w.l
r-
a
o
w.l
...J
~z
o
w.l
c,
w.l
::r::
I-
u,
I-
::r::
:A'
:A'
o
""0
::r:
-t:t:l
-a
.....,
'z
.....,
w.l
::r::
::r:
m
'TJ
:A'
rn
I~
o
ir:
rn
v:
w.l
tT1
><
~
~
tT1
:A'
w.l
I-
C/)
::r:
-ro
H1
'MO 'HJ33dS
.ro
Y\l0033'Md 3H.l