Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
February 2015
Web Survey
To gather feedback from the community and external
stakeholders, the Northlands Arena Strategy Committee
(NASC) created the Engagement Subcommittee. One of the
tactics to identify and assess the communitys needs was
the Arena Survey which took place from December 2, 2014
January 31, 2015. To encourage participation, the NASC held
a press conference supported by a media release, erected
signs on the Northlands site and invested in outdoor digital
signage around the city. Other forms of communication
included social media updates, handouts to patrons parking at
Northlands and email notifications. In total, 26,019 individuals
completed the online survey and provided their input on the
future facility and site use of Rexall Place. The findings of the
survey are presented below. 1
Survey Findings
Findings from the survey are generally presented in the same
order as were asked in the questionnaire. Overall findings
are presented in graphical format where appropriate. Some
findings from the subsegment analysis is presented alongside
the overall findings. Refer to the Appendix for the complete
subsegment analysis
VISITATION TO
REXALL PLACE
Respondents were asked to identify the
number of events they had attended
at Rexall Place in the previous 3 years.
As illustrated in the accompanying
graph, one-quarter (25%) of respondents
had attended three or fewer events
including three percent (3%) who had
not attended a single event. Conversely
over one-third (39%) of respondents
attended 10 or more events including
seventeen percent (17%) who have
attended twenty or more.
40%
37%
35%
30%
25%
22%
22%
20%
17%
15%
10%
3%
5%
0%
1-3
4-9
10-19
20 or more
Subsegment Analysis
Men were more likely to attend 20 or more events than women (21% vs 12%).
Income correlates to number of events attended26% of respondents with a
household income over $150,000 attended 20 or more events compared with
9% of respondents with an income of less than $50,000.
Respondents from beyond the capital region were less likely to attend 20 or
more events (11%) compared with respondents from the Capital Region (19%)
and Edmonton (18%).
75%
LRT
42%
Bus
4%
Walk
3%
Other
2%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
Subsegment Analysis
The younger the respondent, the more likely they were to use the LRT (57% of those
29 years and younger versus 32% of respondents aged 60 years and older).
Levels of income corresponds to use of the LRTthe higher the household income
the less likely that LRT is a typical mode of transportation (53% for households of
less than $50,000 versus 38% for households of more than $150,000.
1 Other included people who used
taxi services or who used a
combination of means in a single trip.
Households with greater incomes are more likely to drive to an event at Rexall (81%
for households with an income greater than $150,000 versus 61% for households
with an income less than $50,000.
85%
70%
41%
29%
Major Events
27%
Family Entertainment
27%
15%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Subsegment Analysis
Older respondents (60 years and older) were less likely to attend an Oilers game
(54%) than respondents 30 39 years (77%) and 29 years and younger (76%).
Respondents 60 years and older were more likely to attend CFR (40%) than
those 30 39 (25%) and 29 years and younger (25%).
The higher the household income the more likely they attend an Oilers game
(81% of households with an income greater than $150,000 compared to 54% of
households with an income of less than $50,000).
The higher the household income the more likely they attend a major event
(36% of households with an income greater than $150,000 compared to 19% of
households with an income of less than $50,000).
IMPORTANCE OF
REXALL PLACE
Very important
Not important
Unsure
5%
20%
24%
Somewhat important
51%
Subsegment Analysis
Older respondents (60 years and older) were more likely to say Rexall Place is
very important to them (28%) than respondents 30 39 years (15%) and 29 years
and younger (17%).
Somewhat important
Not important
Unsure
5%
9%
42%
44%
Subsegment Analysis
The lower the household income the more likely respondents say that Rexall
Place is very important to Edmonton (50% of respondents with a household
income of less than $50,000 compared with 35% of households with a
household income more than $150,000).
Respondents from Edmonton were less likely to say Rexall is very important to
Edmonton (39%) compared with respondents from beyond the Capital Region (53%).
Very important
Somewhat important
45%
Not important
Unsure
12%
7%
36%
Subsegment Analysis
Thirty-eight percent (38%) of respondents from the Capital Region said
Rexall Place is very important to the Region compared with 32% of Edmonton
respondents and 47% of respondents from elsewhere in Alberta.
Somewhat important
Not important
Unsure
44% 19%
9%
28%
Subsegment Analysis
Respondents from Alberta beyond the Capital Region were more likely to
say Rexall Place is very important (42%) compared with respondents from the
Capital Region (27%) and Edmonton (25%).
THE FUTURE OF
REXALL PLACE
A variety of options exist for the future
of Rexall Place. Respondents were
provided with a list and asked to select
the one option that they think is most
suitable. The options offered included:
Close the facility (leave it standing);
Demolish the building (use the land
for other purposes/build something
else);
Keep it as is (keep its current set-up
and configuration);
Repurpose
Keep it as is
30%
15%
14%
1%
<1%
0%
40%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
Subsegment Analysis
Younger respondents were more likely to identify repurpose for the future
of Rexall Place compared with older respondents (49% of those 29 years and
younger and 42% of 30 39 years compared with 35% of respondents 40 years
and older).
Respondents with a household income of more than $150,000 were more likely
to favour demolition (20%) than were respondents with an income of less than
$50,000 (10%).
Repurpose Suggestions
While survey respondents were not specifically asked to provide suggestions
for a repurposed facility some ideas were identified. The most commonly cited
suggestions included the following.
Dedicated concert hall. It was suggested that Rexall place could have its
seating capacity reduced to provide a more intimate experience and offer a
better experience for concert patrons. This could be achieved by improving the
seating and acoustics and making the facility purpose built. This venue would
offer greater capacity than other venues in Edmonton. Although smaller than
the new arena, its single purpose use would ensure a better concert experience.
Recreation/training centre. Many variations of this theme were expressed.
Some indicated that there was a need for more recreation centres in Edmonton.
Others felt that its current use could be leveraged to provide sporting
opportunities. It could provide a home for sport agencies and organizations
in Edmonton. Specific components identified included multiple ice rinks,
fieldhouse space, gymnasium type space, racquet sport areas, track & field
amenities, a large fitness centre, etc.
Market/shopping area. There was a variety of specifics cited within this theme
but essentially this centered on transforming the facility into a destination
shopping experience. This could include microshops, food stalls and
restaurants, flea markets, and a Granville Island like experience.
Housing. Many respondents spoke about repurposing Rexall Place into low
income/affordable housing. Others suggested a homeless shelter could be
included in the facility.
Yes
No
46%
32%
22%
Subsegment Analysis
Respondents with a household income of less than $50,000 were more likely
(54%) to say two major arena facilities can survive than respondents with a
household income above $150,000 (40%).
THE FUTURE OF
NORTHLANDS
While the focus of the survey was on
the future of Rexall Place, respondents
were asked a question about the future
of Northlands (including Rexall Place,
Northlands Park and the Edmonton
EXPO Centre). As illustrated in the graph,
respondents see the primary future of
Northlands hosting special events (82%);
hosting concerts, performances, family
shows (77%); and facilitating agricultural
interpretation (such as 4H, livestock
programs, dog shows).
82%
77%
73%
62%
43%
Other
10%
8%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Subsegment Analysis
Older respondents were more likely to identify agriculture related functions for
the future of Northlands compared with younger respondents.
Facilitating agricultural interpretation (61% of those 29 years and younger
versus 84% of those 60 years and older).
Promoting and facilitating agricultural activities (47% of those 29 years and
younger versus 77% of those 60 years and older).
Facilitating urban agriculture (36% of those 29 years and younger versus
50% of those 60 years and older).
9
OTHER COMMENTS
Finally, respondents were able to share any other comments
they had regarding the future of Rexall Place. Over six thousand
comments were provided. A wide range of opinions, advice,
and suggestions were shared on a variety of themes, ideas,
and visions. Some respondents were adamant on the
importance of keeping Rexall Place while others argued for
repurposing or demolishing. Specific events and uses were
proposed for the location. The following outlines common
themes and responses from the general comments section
concerning the future of Rexall Place.
History and memories. A lot of support was displayed in
favour of keeping Rexall Place due to the arenas history
and an abundance of great memories with family and
friends, both contributing to a strong sense of place
attachment. Emotion was revealed amongst the many
respondents who disliked the idea of demolishing or
changing the building. A handful of people were more
concerned about the future of Gretzkys statue than the
actual building itself.
Other comments:
Given the land is right on the LRT line it would be
wonderful if the building were to be demolished and a
new sustainable, transit based, community were to be
based there. There is an opportunity to build in ties to
urban agriculture and to create enough density to have
a vibrant community with shops, a farmers market, etc.
This could anchor the continuing revitalization of 118 Ave
and bring increased activity to the newly upgraded
Borden Park.
RESPONDENT PROFILE
Respondent Characteristics
Respondent Characteristics
Proportion
Proportion
Edmonton
60%
Female
49%
Capital Region
21%
Male
51%
Alberta
17%
Other
2%
Yes
2%
No
98%
One
11%
Two
37%
Three
20%
Yes
3%
Four
21%
No
96%
Five
8%
Unsure
1%
Six or more
3%
4%
20 29 years
21%
30 39 years
22%
40 59 years
40%
60 69 years
10%
3%
11
7%
$50,000 $75,000
11%
$75,001 $100,000
13%
$100,001 $125,000
12%
$125,001 $150,000
10%
22%
25%
Conclusions
A number of conclusions can be drawn from the responses
provided by survey participants.
Based on the participation in the survey (26,000+
responses) there is a great deal of interest in the future
of Rexall Place.
Approximately one-third (39%) of respondents attended
more than three events per year on average. The median
number of events attended averages one to three
per year.
Driving is a primary means of getting to events at
Rexall Place (75%).
Concerts/musical performances are the main draw to
Rexall Place (85% attended concerts); 70% attended an
Oilers game.
Rexall is considered important, particularly to Edmonton
(42% said it is very important).
With repurpose (40%) and keep it as is (30%) the
top two supported options, it is clear that respondents
believe Rexall Place has a future purpose.
Some suggested repurpose ideas include:
dedicated concert hall; recreation or training centre;
market/shopping location; and housing.
There is a belief that Northlands should continue
to host special events (82%) and concerts (77%).
Maintaining its connection to its agricultural roots is
important. Seventy-three percent (73%) of respondents
said Northlands should continue facilitating agricultural
interpretation (including 4H, livestock programs,
dog shows, etc).
12
13
Subsegment Analysis
Number of Events Attended in Previous 3 Years
0
13
49
10 19
20 or more
2%
19%
37%
24%
17%
30 39 years
2%
19%
37%
24%
19%
40 59 years
3%
22%
37%
22%
16%
6%
33%
35%
13%
13%
Female
2%
24%
40%
21%
12%
Male
3%
20%
34%
23%
21%
6%
34%
36%
16%
9%
$50 $100k
3%
26%
39%
20%
12%
$100 $150k
2%
19%
38%
24%
17%
1%
14%
32%
26%
26%
0 3 visits
11%
89%
<1%
<1%
<1%
4 9 visits
<1%
<1%
100%
<1%
<1%
10 or more visits
<1%
<1%
<1%
57%
43%
Edmonton
3%
21%
36%
22%
18%
Capital Region
2%
16%
37%
25%
19%
Alberta
3%
28%
40%
19%
11%
Age
Gender
Income
Number of Visits
Residency
14
LRT
Bus
Walk
Other
67%
57%
6%
3%
2%
30 39 years
74%
46%
3%
3%
3%
40 59 years
80%
34%
3%
3%
2%
79%
32%
3%
2%
2%
Female
75%
43%
4%
3%
3%
Male
75%
42%
3%
3%
2%
61%
53%
10%
6%
2%
$50 $100k
71%
47%
4%
4%
2%
$100 $150k
76%
42%
3%
3%
2%
81%
38%
2%
2%
2%
0 3 visits
68%
43%
5%
3%
2%
4 9 visits
74%
44%
4%
3%
2%
10 or more visits
80%
41%
3%
2%
2%
Edmonton
68%
51%
5%
4%
2%
Capital Region
88%
29%
2%
1%
2%
Alberta
85%
28%
1%
2%
3%
Age
Gender
Income
Number of Visits
Residency
15
Oilers
Oil Kings
CFR
Major
Event
Family
Entertainment
Rush
88%
76%
46%
25%
23%
20%
18%
30 39 years
87%
77%
42%
25%
26%
31%
16%
40 59 years
86%
67%
40%
31%
28%
28%
13%
73%
54%
32%
40%
34%
31%
8%
Female
89%
62%
35%
31%
22%
30%
12%
Male
81%
78%
47%
28%
32%
23%
17%
81%
54%
34%
27%
19%
26%
13%
$50 $100k
83%
66%
39%
29%
24%
26%
15%
$100 $150k
86%
74%
44%
29%
29%
28%
15%
88%
81%
45%
32%
36%
27%
16%
0 3 visits
71%
40%
16%
19%
12%
21%
5%
4 9 visits
87%
68%
35%
28%
21%
27%
11%
10 or more visits
91%
87%
60%
36%
42%
30%
24%
Edmonton
86%
71%
44%
26%
27%
27%
15%
Capital Region
86%
74%
47%
34%
32%
28%
17%
Alberta
82%
60%
26%
36%
23%
25%
10%
Age
Gender
Income
Number of Visits
Residency
16
Somewhat important
Not important
Unsure
17%
52%
24%
6%
30 39 years
15%
49%
31%
6%
40 59 years
23%
50%
22%
5%
28%
50%
18%
4%
Female
23%
53%
18%
6%
Male
18%
48%
30%
5%
25%
50%
20%
5%
$50 $100k
21%
53%
21%
5%
$100 $150k
18%
51%
26%
5%
17%
48%
30%
5%
0 3 visits
13%
49%
32%
6%
4 9 visits
20%
53%
22%
5%
10 or more visits
25%
49%
21%
5%
Edmonton
20%
50%
25%
5%
Capital Region
19%
53%
23%
5%
Alberta
23%
52%
19%
6%
Age
Gender
Income
Number of Visits
Residency
17
Somewhat important
Not important
Unsure
39%
48%
9%
5%
30 39 years
33%
48%
12%
6%
40 59 years
45%
41%
9%
5%
51%
38%
6%
5%
Female
50%
41%
4%
6%
Male
34%
47%
14%
5%
50%
39%
7%
5%
$50 $100k
44%
44%
8%
4%
$100 $150k
39%
47%
10%
5%
35%
45%
14%
5%
0 3 visits
40%
44%
9%
7%
4 9 visits
43%
45%
8%
5%
10 or more visits
42%
43%
11%
4%
Edmonton
39%
46%
11%
5%
Capital Region
41%
45%
9%
5%
Alberta
53%
36%
5%
6%
Age
Gender
Income
Number of Visits
Residency
18
Somewhat important
Not important
Unsure
29%
49%
14%
8%
30 39 years
28%
48%
16%
8%
40 59 years
40%
44%
11%
6%
49%
40%
7%
5%
Female
42%
44%
7%
7%
Male
30%
47%
18%
6%
41%
43%
9%
7%
$50 $100k
38%
46%
11%
6%
$100 $150k
33%
47%
13%
6%
31%
46%
17%
6%
0 3 visits
34%
46%
12%
8%
4 9 visits
37%
47%
11%
6%
10 or more visits
36%
45%
15%
6%
Edmonton
32%
47%
14%
7%
Capital Region
38%
46%
12%
5%
Alberta
47%
40%
7%
6%
Age
Gender
Income
Number of Visits
Residency
19
Somewhat important
Not important
Unsure
21%
44%
24%
11%
30 39 years
22%
44%
24%
10%
40 59 years
32%
44%
16%
8%
40%
43%
10%
6%
Female
33%
44%
13%
10%
Male
23%
44%
25%
8%
31%
43%
16%
9%
$50 $100k
30%
45%
17%
8%
$100 $150k
26%
45%
21%
8%
24%
45%
23%
8%
0 3 visits
27%
44%
19%
10%
4 9 visits
29%
45%
17%
9%
10 or more visits
28%
43%
20%
8%
Edmonton
25%
44%
21%
10%
Capital Region
27%
46%
19%
8%
Alberta
42%
42%
10%
6%
Age
Gender
Income
Number of Visits
Residency
20
Keep as is
Unsure
Demolish
Other
Close
49%
27%
9%
13%
1%
<1%
30 39 years
42%
24%
16%
18%
<!%
<1%
40 59 years
35%
33%
18%
13%
1%
<1%
35%
38%
18%
9%
1%
<1%
Female
41%
33%
16%
9%
1%
<1%
Male
39%
28%
14%
19%
1%
<1%
42%
35%
12%
10%
1%
<1%
$50 $100k
42%
32%
14%
12%
1%
<1%
$100 $150k
40%
30%
14%
15%
1%
<1%
39%
25%
16%
20%
<1%
<1%
0 3 visits
41%
28%
17%
14%
1%
<1%
4 9 visits
40%
32%
15%
12%
<1%
<1%
10 or more visits
39%
30%
15%
15%
1%
<1%
Edmonton
41%
28%
15%
15%
1%
<1%
Capital Region
40%
32%
15%
13%
1%
<1%
Alberta
36%
39%
15%
9%
1%
<1%
Age
Gender
Income
Number of Visits
Residency
21
No
Unsure
48%
34%
18%
30 39 years
40%
39%
21%
40 59 years
48%
29%
24%
53%
24%
23%
Female
49%
26%
25%
Male
44%
38%
18%
54%
27%
19%
$50 $100k
49%
29%
22%
$100 $150k
46%
34%
20%
40%
40%
20%
0 3 visits
43%
33%
24%
4 9 visits
47%
30%
23%
10 or more visits
48%
33%
19%
Edmonton
44%
34%
22%
Capital Region
47%
31%
22%
Alberta
53%
24%
23%
Age
Gender
Income
Number of Visits
Residency
22
Hosting
Concerts
Ag
Interpretation
Ag
Activities
Urban
Agriculture
Unsure
82%
80%
61%
47%
36%
7%
30 39 years
81%
74%
70%
58%
42%
10%
40 59 years
82%
77%
78%
68%
45%
8%
82%
78%
84%
77%
50%
6%
Female
84%
80%
76%
63%
45%
7%
Male
80%
74%
71%
61%
41%
9%
82%
81%
71%
61%
44%
6%
$50 $100k
82%
79%
73%
62%
45%
7%
$100 $150k
83%
77%
74%
62%
42%
8%
80%
72%
73%
65%
42%
9%
0 3 visits
79%
75%
72%
61%
43%
9%
4 9 visits
84%
79%
74%
62%
44%
8%
10 or more visits
82%
76%
74%
62%
42%
8%
Edmonton
82%
75%
72%
60%
44%
9%
Capital Region
83%
78%
76%
65%
41%
7%
Alberta
81%
82%
76%
66%
40%
7%
Age
Gender
Income
Number of Visits
Residency
23