Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
VIRTUAL FORUM
November 15th - 26th, 2010
RT
2 . 397
1 . 2729
20
with average deviation 12,11% and 1,35%
k 2 KBO = 6 .2325 .10 exp
[ KBO 2 ]
2
RT
respectively. Copyright 2010 Praise Worthy Prize S.r.l. - All rights reserved.
Nomenclature
d
DCO2
g
h
k1
k1boric cid
k1
k2
k2,boric acid
k2,boric acid
kg
Q
q
r
R
Re
Sc
Sh
t
T
u
us
v
V
Temperature, (K)
Distribution of velocity in film, m/s
Velocity in film surface , m/s.
Liquid flow rate, m3/s.
Volume of liquid, m3
Thickness of liquid film, m
Viscosity of liquid, kg /m.s
Density of liquid, kg/m3
I.
Introduction
solvent regeneration.
However, the reaction rate
between carbon dioxide with potassium carbonate is
lower than the reaction rate with amines solution ([9],
[10])
Several researchers have shown that the application of
piperazine/amines-promoted potassium carbonate could
accelerate the absorption process ([11] [15]). However,
many promoters are carcinogenic in nature and some
others are not stable at stripper conditions. In this case,
boric acid is environmental friendly.
There is some information available regarding the
absorption of carbon dioxide using aqueous solution of
potassium carbonate promoted with boric acid [16]. But
none of the literature discussed the detailed kinetics of
the reaction of carbon dioxide in the liquid phase for
boric acid promoted potassium carbonate solvent system.
The detailed kinetics of the reaction is essential for the
process design and simulation of CO2 absorption in boric
acid promoted potassium carbonate solvent.
This work focuses on expanding the investigation of
promoted potassium carbonate (K2CO3) by using boric
acid. The main purpose of this work is to investigate the
effect of boric acid on the reaction rate constant of CO2
absorption into aqueous potassium carbonate solution by
using a laboratory wetted wall column. Experimental
kinetic data were collected. A simplified model used to
interpret the results.
II.
II.1.
Theory
Reaction system
(5)
(6)
(7)
(1)
(8)
(9)
HCO3 + OH CO32 + H 2O
(3)
(4)
r = k KBO2 [ KBO2 ]
) ([CO2 ] [CO2 ]e )
(10)
(k
KBO2
OH + k KBO [ KBO2 ]
2
) ([CO ] [CO ] )
2
(11)
2 e
(12)
(13)
II.3.
2895
= 13, 635
0 , 08 I
T
II.2.
sh = 1, 075 Re Sc
h
(14)
(15)
Re =
g 2
2
3 Qsol
gW
(17)
(18)
(19)
where:
C Ai =
kG PA + DA k1 C Ae
kG He + DA k1
C Ae =
K 2 [HCO3- ]2
K1[CO 22 ]
(23)
Sc =
DCO2
(24)
(16)
ud
Sh = RTk g h / DCO2
(22)
0 ,85
t =
(20)
(21)
IV.
C
P1
P2
R1
R2
T1
T2
T3
T4
T5
t
V1
V2
V3
WWC
: Heater
: Promoted K2CO3
pump.
: Water pump.
: Liquid rotameter.
: Gas rotameter.
: Waterbath
: Promoted K2CO3
tank.
: Overflow tank.
: CO2 tank
: Sample tank.
:Thermocouple
: Liquid Valve
: CO2Valve
:Valve ( by pass )
:Wetted wall
column.
v x 106
m3/s
5
6.667
8.333
10
TABLE I
EXPERIMENTAL RESULT OF ABSORPTION RATE
q x 108
t
T
kmol/s
s
K
Sol-1
Sol-2
Sol-3
0.817
2.001
3.982
5.211
0.675
4.965
5.944
7.548
303
0.581
5.944
10.765
12.188
0.515
9.810
14.537
16.536
5
6.667
8.333
10
0.817
0.675
0.581
0.515
5
6.667
8.333
10
0.817
0.675
0.581
0.515
313
323
2.994
5.944
8.850
11.715
4.965
6.918
11.715
14.537
5.944
7.886
12.660
16.536
3.982
7.886
10.765
12.660
4.965
9.810
12.660
15.469
6.918
9.810
13.601
17.320
CO3= + H 2 O HCO3 + OH
(29)
TABLE III
EXPERIMENT RESULT OF REACTION RATE CONSTANT IN EQUATION
(28)
k2. 10-4 ( m3/kmol.s )
Solution
303 K
313 K
323 K
Sol-1
3.006
10.851
33.708
Sol-2
9.212
20.933
63.026
Sol-3
18.658
40.081
161.599
TABLE IV
EXPERIMENTAL RESULT OF REACTION RATE CONSTANT
k1' . 10-4 ( 1/s )
Solution
(26)
CO3= + H + HCO3
(27)
(28)
CO2 + OH
303 K
313 K
323 K
303 K
313 K
323 K
Sol-1
0.488
1.761
5.464
0.486
1.755
5.452
Sol-2
2.981
6.775
20.397
2.980
6.771
20.387
Sol-3
9.054
19.451
78.416
9.053
19.447
78.408
RT
2.397
1.2729
k '2 KBO2 = 6.2325.1020 exp
(31)
[ KBO2 ]
RT
TABLE V
AVERAGE DEVIATION OF EQUATION (30)
k2 * 10-5
eksperiment
k2 (Eq 30 )
[KBO2]
(K)
(kmol/m3)
303
deviation
(m3/kmol.s)
(m3/kmol.s)
0.16173
0.3007
3.077.E+04
2%
313
0.16173
1.085
9.631.E+04
11%
323
0.16173
3.371
2.809.E+05
17%
303
0.32347
92.12
7.646.E+04
17%
313
0.32347
2.093
2.325.E+05
11%
323
0.32347
6.303
6.599.E+05
5%
303
0.48520
1.866
1.900.E+05
2%
313
0.48520
4.008
5.612.E+05
40%
1.550.E+06
4%
323
0.48520
161.6
ARD =
12.11%
[3]
TABLE VI
AVERAGE DEVIATION OF EQUATION (31)
T
[KBO2]
k2 experiment
k2 (eq. 31)
(K)
(kmol/m3)
(1/.s)
(1/s)
303
0.16173
30065.0643
30766.2532
0.26%
313
0.16173
108520.3163
96308.2032
1.25%
323
0.16173
337103.1421
280908.8011
1.85%
303
0.32347
92121.5208
76461.5334
1.89%
313
0.32347
209325.5231
232487.7614
1.23%
323
0.32347
630265.2363
659861.4003
0.52%
303
0.48520
186575.5100
190025.2866
0.21%
313
0.48520
400807.0510
561224.8736
4.45%
323
0.48520
1615986.9518
1550029.9950
0.45%
deviation
[4]
[5]
[6]
[7]
[8]
1.35%
[9]
V.
Conclusion
Acknowledgements
The authors wish to acknowledge the financial
support of:
- Guru Besar research grant administered by the
Department of Research and Social Services, Institute
Technology of Sepuluh Nopember, Surabaya , Indonesia.
- Research Grant Program for Doctoral Students by
Directorate of Higher Education, The Ministry of
National Education of Indonesia.
References
[1]
[2]
[10]
[11]
[12]
[13]
[14]
[15]
[16]
Authors Information
First Authors name: Lily Pudjiastuti
Place and date of birth:
Banjarmasin,
Indonesia, July 03th 1958.
Educational background: Bachelor s degree
in Chemical Engineering from Institut Teknologi
Sepuluh Nopember (ITS) Surabaya, Indonesia in
1983; Masters degree in Chemical Engineering
from Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember
(ITS) Surabaya, Indonesia in 2002.
Second Authors name: Erwan Adi Saputra,
Place and date of birth: Surabaya, Indonesia,
August 03th 1980.
Educational background:
Bachelors degree in Chemical Engineering,
from
Institut
Teknologi
Sepuluh
Nopember,Surabaya, Indonesia in 2002.