Sie sind auf Seite 1von 9

Zogby Analytics Online Survey of Likely Voters in West Virginia

2/20/15 - 2/21/15 MOE +/- 5.5 Percentage Points


State

Frequency
Valid

West Virginia

Valid
Percent

Percent

326

100.0

Cumulative
Percent

100.0

100.0

2002. How likely are you to vote in national elections?

Frequency
Valid

Definitely
Very likely
Somewhat likely
Total

Valid
Percent

Percent

Cumulative
Percent

243

74.6

74.6

74.6

49

15.1

15.1

89.7
100.0

34

10.3

10.3

326

100.0

100.0

Party

Frequency
Valid

Valid
Percent

Percent

Cumulative
Percent

Democratic

160

49.0

49.0

49.0

Republican

108

33.0

33.0

82.0

59

18.0

18.0

100.0

326

100.0

100.0

Independent
Total

1. President Obama has announced his intention to take executive action that would allow about 5 million illegal immigrants to live
and work legally in the United States. He plans to take this action without authorization from Congress. Do you support or oppose
the president acting on his own to allow about 5 million illegal immigrants to remain in the U.S. and grant them work authorization?

Frequency
Valid

Percent

Valid
Percent

Cumulative
Percent

Strongly support

28

8.6

8.6

8.6

Somewhat support

37

11.4

11.4

20.0

Somewhat oppose

49

15.1

15.1

35.1

194

59.7

59.7

94.8

17

5.2

5.2

100.0

326

100.0

100.0

Strongly oppose
Don't know
Total

Subsets have a larger margin of error than the whole data set. As a rule we do not rely on the validity of very small
subsets of the data, especially sets smaller than 50-75 respondents. At that size subset we can make generalizations,
but in these cases the data is more qualitative than quantitative
Zogby Analytics
Page 1
2/22/2015

Zogby Analytics Online Survey of Likely Voters in West Virginia


2/20/15 - 2/21/15 MOE +/- 5.5 Percentage Points
2. The House of Representatives recently passed a bill that fully funds the Department of Homeland Security through
the remainder of this year, but prohibits the use of that money to carry out the president's plan to shield millions of illegal
aliens from deportation and grant them work authorization. Do you support or oppose passage of a bill that fully funds
the Department of Homeland Security but prohibits the use of those funds to carry out the president's immigration plan?

Frequency
Valid

Strongly support

Valid
Percent

Percent

Cumulative
Percent

134

41.2

41.2

41.2

Somewhat support

56

17.3

17.3

58.5

Somewhat oppose

53

16.2

16.2

74.7

Strongly oppose

56

17.2

17.2

91.9

Don't know

26

8.1

8.1

100.0

326

100.0

100.0

Total

3. Last year, Sen. Joe Manchin stated, 'I disagree with the President's decision to use executive action to make
changes to our immigration system...' However, this month Senator Manchin voted against legislation that would bar
the use of federal funds to implement the president's plan to shield millions of illegal aliens from deportation and
grant them work authorization. Which of the following statements best reflects your views on Sen. Manchin's stance?

Frequency
Valid

Sen. Manchin should support


legislation to defund the
president's executive action on
immigration.
Sen. Manchin should oppose
legislation to defund the
president's executive action on
immigration.
Don't know.
Total

Valid
Percent

Percent

Cumulative
Percent

154

47.2

47.2

47.2

120

36.9

36.9

84.1

52

15.9

15.9

100.0

326

100.0

100.0

4. President Obama has said that if Congress sends him a Department of Homeland Security bill that
prohibits him from using funds to implement his executive action on immigration, he will veto the bill. In
your opinion, would the president be justified in vetoing the Homeland Security funding bill because it limits
his ability to carry out his plan to shield illegal aliens from deportation and grant them work authorization?

Frequency
Valid

Percent

Valid
Percent

Cumulative
Percent

Yes, the president would be


justified in vetoing the Homeland
Security funding bill.

78

23.9

23.9

23.9

No, the president would not be


justified in vetoing the Homeland
Security funding bill.

225

69.0

69.0

92.8

23

7.2

7.2

100.0

326

100.0

100.0

Don't know.
Total

Subsets have a larger margin of error than the whole data set. As a rule we do not rely on the validity of very small
subsets of the data, especially sets smaller than 50-75 respondents. At that size subset we can make generalizations,
but in these cases the data is more qualitative than quantitative
Zogby Analytics
Page 2
2/22/2015

Zogby Analytics Online Survey of Likely Voters in West Virginia


2/20/15 - 2/21/15 MOE +/- 5.5 Percentage Points
5. If the House and Senate cannot come to an agreement on legislation to fund the Department of Homeland Security,
there is a possibility that about 15 percent of the department's operations could be shutdown. The other 85 percent of
DHS personnel are considered essential workers and would remain on the job even if a spending bill is not approved.
In your opinion, who would be most responsible if a partial shutdown of DHS operations were to occur?

Frequency
Valid

Percent

Valid
Percent

Cumulative
Percent

House Republicans who insist


on including provisions
preventing the president from
carrying out his executive action
on immigration.

62

19.1

19.1

19.1

Senate Democrats and


President Obama who insist on
allowing Homeland Security
funds to be used to carry out the
president's executive action on
immigration.

155

47.6

47.6

66.7

108

33.3

33.3

100.0

326

100.0

100.0

Both would be equally


responsible.
Total

6. Supporters of the president's executive action on immigration argue that it would make the country more secure because it will
help us identify the people who are currently living here illegally. Opponents of the president's plan argue that it would make the
country less secure because it would divert resources and manpower away from the department's primary mission of securing
the homeland. In your opinion, what effect would the president's executive action on immigration have on homeland security?

Frequency
Valid

It would make the country


more secure.
It would make the country
less secure.
It would have little or no
effect on homeland security.
Don't know.
Total

Percent

Valid
Percent

Cumulative
Percent

51

15.6

15.6

15.6

180

55.3

55.3

70.9

69

21.1

21.1

92.1

26

7.9

7.9

100.0

326

100.0

100.0

Gender

Frequency
Valid

Percent

Valid
Percent

Cumulative
Percent

Male

153

47.0

47.0

47.0

Female

173

53.0

53.0

100.0

Total

326

100.0

100.0

Subsets have a larger margin of error than the whole data set. As a rule we do not rely on the validity of very small
subsets of the data, especially sets smaller than 50-75 respondents. At that size subset we can make generalizations,
but in these cases the data is more qualitative than quantitative
Zogby Analytics
Page 3
2/22/2015

Zogby Analytics Online Survey of Likely Voters in West Virginia


2/20/15 - 2/21/15 MOE +/- 5.5 Percentage Points
What is your current employment status?

Frequency
Valid

Working (full or part time)

Cumulative
Percent

156

48.0

48.3

48.3

13

4.1

4.1

52.3

11

3.5

3.5

55.8

Temporarily unemployed and


looking for work
Temporarily unemployed and not
looking for work
Student

19

5.8

5.8

61.7

Stay at home parent/spouse

37

11.4

11.5

73.1

Retired

87

26.7

26.9

100.0

324

99.4

100.0

.6

326

100.0

Total
Missing

Valid
Percent

Percent

.00

Total

Household Income

Frequency
Valid

Cumulative
Percent

< $25K

78

24.0

25.5

25.5

$25-35K

35

10.7

11.3

36.8

$35-50K

63

19.2

20.4

57.2

$50-75K

60

18.5

19.6

76.8

$75-100K

47

14.5

15.4

92.2

$100-150K

17

5.3

5.6

97.9

2.0

2.1

100.0

307

94.2

100.0

19

5.8

326

100.0

$150K+
Total
Missing

Valid
Percent

Percent

Total

Age group A

Frequency
Valid

Percent

Valid
Percent

Cumulative
Percent

18-29

59

18.0

18.0

18.0

30-49

108

33.0

33.0

51.0

50-64

114

35.0

35.0

86.0

46

14.0

14.0

100.0

326

100.0

100.0

65+
Total

Subsets have a larger margin of error than the whole data set. As a rule we do not rely on the validity of very small
subsets of the data, especially sets smaller than 50-75 respondents. At that size subset we can make generalizations,
but in these cases the data is more qualitative than quantitative
Zogby Analytics
Page 4
2/22/2015

Zogby Analytics Online Survey of Likely Voters in West Virginia


2/20/15 - 2/21/15 MOE +/- 5.5 Percentage Points
Age group B

Frequency
Valid

Valid
Percent

Percent

Cumulative
Percent

18-24

39

11.9

11.9

11.9

25-34

45

13.7

13.7

25.6

35-54

113

34.6

34.6

60.2

55-69

115

35.2

35.2

95.3

15

4.7

4.7

100.0

326

100.0

100.0

70+
Total

Generation

Frequency
Valid

Percent

Valid
Percent

Cumulative
Percent

First Globals

83

25.6

25.6

25.6

Nikes

75

23.1

23.1

48.7

143

43.8

43.8

92.5

24

7.5

7.5

100.0

326

100.0

100.0

Woodstockers
Privates
Total

Education

Frequency
Valid

Missing
Total

Valid
Percent

Percent

Cumulative
Percent

No College Degree

178

54.7

55.1

55.1

College Degree+

145

44.6

44.9

100.0

Total

324

99.4

100.0

.00

.6

326

100.0

Subsets have a larger margin of error than the whole data set. As a rule we do not rely on the validity of very small
subsets of the data, especially sets smaller than 50-75 respondents. At that size subset we can make generalizations,
but in these cases the data is more qualitative than quantitative
Zogby Analytics
Page 5
2/22/2015

Zogby Analytics Online Survey of Likely Voters in West Virginia


2/20/15 - 2/21/15 MOE +/- 5.5 Percentage Points
Race

Frequency
Valid

White

Cumulative
Percent

301

92.4

93.0

93.0

Hisp

Missing

Valid
Percent

Percent

10

3.0

3.0

96.0

AfrAmer

2.0

2.0

98.0

Asian

1.0

1.0

99.0

Other

1.0

1.0

100.0

Total

324

99.4

100.0

.6

326

100.0

.00

Total

Live

Frequency
Valid

Valid
Percent

Percent

Cumulative
Percent

Lge City

2.3

2.3

2.3

Sm City

118

36.2

36.2

38.5

Suburbs

60

18.5

18.5

57.0

Rural

140

43.0

43.0

100.0

Total

326

100.0

100.0

Ideology Recoded

Frequency
Valid

Liberal
Moderate

Missing
Total

Percent

Valid
Percent

62

19.0

19.9

Cumulative
Percent

19.9

89

27.2

28.4

48.2

Conservative

162

49.7

51.8

100.0

Total

313

96.0

100.0

13

4.0

326

100.0

.00

Subsets have a larger margin of error than the whole data set. As a rule we do not rely on the validity of very small
subsets of the data, especially sets smaller than 50-75 respondents. At that size subset we can make generalizations,
but in these cases the data is more qualitative than quantitative
Zogby Analytics
Page 6
2/22/2015

Zogby Analytics Online Survey of Likely Voters in West Virginia


2/20/15 - 2/21/15 MOE +/- 5.5 Percentage Points
Religion

Frequency
Valid

Catholic
Protestant

Valid
Percent

Percent

Cumulative
Percent

24

7.4

7.4

7.4

183

56.3

56.3

63.7

Jewish

.3

.3

64.0

Other/None

118

36.0

36.0

100.0

Total

326

100.0

100.0

BornAgain

Frequency
Valid

Yes

Valid
Percent

Cumulative
Percent

114

35.0

62.2

62.2

69

21.3

37.8

100.0

Total

183

56.3

100.0

143

43.7

326

100.0

No/NS

Missing

Percent

Total

Union member

Frequency
Valid

Missing

Yes

Percent

Valid
Percent

Cumulative
Percent

41

12.7

12.9

12.9

No

281

86.1

87.1

100.0

Total

322

98.8

100.0

1.2

326

100.0

Total

Child under 17?

Frequency
Valid

Missing
Total

Yes

Percent

Valid
Percent

Cumulative
Percent

98

30.0

30.4

30.4

No

224

68.8

69.6

100.0

Total

322

98.8

100.0

1.2

326

100.0

Subsets have a larger margin of error than the whole data set. As a rule we do not rely on the validity of very small
subsets of the data, especially sets smaller than 50-75 respondents. At that size subset we can make generalizations,
but in these cases the data is more qualitative than quantitative
Zogby Analytics
Page 7
2/22/2015

Zogby Analytics Online Survey of Likely Voters in West Virginia


2/20/15 - 2/21/15 MOE +/- 5.5 Percentage Points
Residency

Frequency
Valid

My city or town
America
The planet earth
Total

Missing

Cumulative
Percent

90

27.6

27.8

27.8

190

58.1

58.4

86.2

45

13.8

13.8

100.0

324

99.5

100.0

.5

326

100.0

Total

Valid
Percent

Percent

Lost a job due to corporate downsizing within the past year? <hr>

Frequency
Valid

Yes

Percent

Valid
Percent

Cumulative
Percent

26

8.0

8.0

8.0

No

300

92.0

92.0

100.0

Total

326

100.0

100.0

Been afraid of losing a job within the next year? <hr>

Frequency
Valid

Yes

Percent

Valid
Percent

Cumulative
Percent

79

24.2

24.2

24.2

No

247

75.8

75.8

100.0

Total

326

100.0

100.0

Worked at a job that pays less than an immediate previous job? <hr>

Frequency
Valid

Percent

Valid
Percent

Cumulative
Percent

Yes

107

32.7

32.7

32.7

No

219

67.3

67.3

100.0

Total

326

100.0

100.0

Subsets have a larger margin of error than the whole data set. As a rule we do not rely on the validity of very small
subsets of the data, especially sets smaller than 50-75 respondents. At that size subset we can make generalizations,
but in these cases the data is more qualitative than quantitative
Zogby Analytics
Page 8
2/22/2015

Zogby Analytics Online Survey of Likely Voters in West Virginia


2/20/15 - 2/21/15 MOE +/- 5.5 Percentage Points
Gone without food for 24 hours in the past month due to a lack of food or money? <hr>

Frequency
Valid

Yes

Percent

Valid
Percent

Cumulative
Percent

38

11.8

11.8

11.8

No

288

88.2

88.2

100.0

Total

326

100.0

100.0

Veteran/Armed Forces?

Frequency
Valid

Yes

Percent

Valid
Percent

Cumulative
Percent

74

22.8

22.8

22.8

No

252

77.2

77.2

100.0

Total

326

100.0

100.0

Subsets have a larger margin of error than the whole data set. As a rule we do not rely on the validity of very small
subsets of the data, especially sets smaller than 50-75 respondents. At that size subset we can make generalizations,
but in these cases the data is more qualitative than quantitative
Zogby Analytics
Page 9
2/22/2015

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen