Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
CHAPTER 2
LITERATURE REVIEW
2.1
GENERAL
2.2
OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE
2.2.1
11
increased the stiffness, flexural strength and shear capacity. The author found
that the shape of the hysteretic loop was influenced by the range of axial force
variation and the rate of change of axial force with lateral deflection.
12
axial loads and low cycle fatigue of the longitudinal bars in the case of low
axial loads. The maximum strength was observed when interstorey drift was
between 2% and 3% and subsequently, strength decreased with additional drifts.
Turer and Akyuz (2003) made a case study and suggested that the
diagonal tension crack at the upper end of the column is due to a combination
of inferior material quality, inadequate transverse reinforcement, and
insufficient column confinement. Insufficient structural resistance combined
with the poor construction quality and detailing causes catastrophic failure of
the structures.
13
2.2.2
Studies on Performance of Beam-Column Joints and NonConventionally Detailed Structural Elements Under Seismic
Loading
14
designed the diagonal reinforcement based on the assumption that the shear
force resolves itself into diagonal tension and compression. Initially, the
diagonal compression is transmitted by concrete and the compression
reinforcement makes no significant contribution. When diagonal tension bars
are loaded to yield range, wide cracks are formed and these cracks remain
open even after the removal of loading. When the reversed load is applied as
during an earthquake, these bars are subjected to large compressive force and
may yield even before the cracks formed previously are closed. As equal
amount of steel was provided in both the diagonal band, the loss of
contribution of concrete will not affect the strength of the beam. Thus the use
of inclined reinforcement prevents brittle failure in short coupling beams.
15
(v) aspect ratio of joints. Their conclusions were (1) transverse reinforcement
in the connection improved the shear capacity, (2) unloaded transverse beams
improved the shear capacity, (3) column axial load had no influence on
ultimate shear capacity of joints, (4) connection geometry had no influence on
shear strength of joints, as far as shear area of the connection remained
constant.
16
17
main beams and the accompanying axial compression were observed to affect
the response of the connections. It was reported that the joint shear in both
interior and exterior connections increased while the column to beam flexural
strength ratio reduced. The lateral resistance was reported to have increased
significantly. A procedure to account for the presence of axial compression in
the main beams in the design of beam-column connections was presented
based on the observed mechanism of lateral load resistance and the observed
behaviour of the connections.
18
joint shear stress and anchorage length were arrived by changing the column
depth. The author stated that, when the anchorage lengths are large, even the
minimum shear reinforcement required for column confinement was adequate
to give good cyclic behaviour. Also it was proved that the assumption of rigid
joints in moment resisting frame is valid only if the anchorage lengths are
equal or exceed 28 bar diameters.
Pantazopoulou and Bonacci (1992) studied the mechanics of beam column joints in laterally loaded structures and lead to formulation based on
compatibility of strain and stress equilibrium within the core. They developed
algebraic expressions relating the average joint shear stress and the associated
joint shear distortion. The model made by them showed that shear strength of
a joint depends on usable compressive strength of concrete as well as the
presence of shear hoops.
19
20
uniaxial bending. The effects of column axial load, shear and tension
reinforcement in the beam on the performance of joints were studied. It was
found that the efficiency of joints increases with the increase in axial load on
column and with the increase in tensile and shear reinforcement in the beam.
The authors found that increase in shear reinforcement decreases ultimate
deflection of beam column joints and this reduction was significant in higher
percentage of tensile reinforcement in beams. They reported that increase in
shear reinforcement in beam increases the ultimate strength of joints at higher
axial load levels.
21
under load reversals. Their work emphasizes the need for larger joint sizes
and extra shear reinforcement in the joint. They reported that the practical
joint detailing using hairpin-type reinforcement is a competitive alternative to
providing closed ties in the joint region.
22
23
the effect of bond-slip of the longitudinal bars passing through the joints in
predicting the beam column joint behaviour under reversed cyclic loading
reflecting the seismic conditions.
Tsonos (2004) conducted an experimental study to find the
improvement of the earthquake resistance of RC beam-column joints with
inclined bars under the influence of P- effect. An analytical model was
developed for predicting ultimate shear strength of joints subjected to
earthquake-type loading, variable axial load and P- effect. The axial load
change and P- effect causes significant deterioration of joint element. The
author concluded that inclined bars in the joint region were effective for
reducing the unfavorable impact of P-effect and axial load change.
Jing et al (2004) conducted experiments on interior joints by
changing the beam reinforcement-detailing pattern at the joint core. Diagonal
steel bars in the form of obtuse Z were installed in two opposite direction of
the joint. The authors found that the non-conventional pattern provided was
suitable for joints in regions of low to moderate seismicity.
Anandavalli
exterior beam column joints and assessed the seismic capacity of the existing
joints in the nuclear power plant structures which were detailed as per IS:
13920:1993. Test results revealed that there is a significant contribution due
to shear deformation on the total deformation suffered by the joint.
24
25
Tsonos (2007) studied experimentally the performance of beamcolumn sub assemblages of modern structures. The test results indicate that
current design procedures could sometimes lead to excessive damage of the
joint regions.
26
The anchorage length requirements for beam and column bars, the
provision of transverse / confining reinforcement, the role of stirrups in shear
transfer at the joint, the design and detailing of the joints are the main issues
found. From the literature reviewed it seems that the major role of ties is to
resist the shear force in the joint core. The study of using additional cross
inclined bars at the joint core shows that the inclined bars introduce an
additional new mechanism of shear transfer and diagonal cleavage fracture at
joints was avoided. In spite of the wide accumulation of test data the influence
of cross inclined bars on shear strength of joints has not been mentioned in
major international codes.
2.2.3
27
28
the
dynamic
behaviour
of
cracked
reinforced
concrete.
(http://opensees.berkely.edu).
This
model
represented
the
29
30
overpressure, and the reaction force with high pressure decays much slower
than the others.
31
experimental testing. Deflections and stresses at the zero deflection point are
modelled well using a finite element package. The load applied to cause
initial cracking of the prestressed concrete beam compares well with hand
calculations. Flexural failure of the prestressed concrete beam was modelled
well using the finite element package, and the load applied at failure was very
close to hand calculated results.
Bakir and Boduroglu (2005) applied nonlinear softened truss model
for membrane elements on beam-column joints incorporating the effect of
bond slip. The authors suggested that the revised model gives very accurate
predictions of shear strength of joints.
2.3
SUMMARY