Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Number 9
Contents
September 2014
ISSN 0376-7256
Page
2-3
4-8
A Comparative Laboratory study on CBR and Permeability of Sub Base Materials Using Chemical Additives and Fibers
Praveen Kumar, G.D. Ransinchung R.N. and Dharampal Singh Kandari
24
Estimation of Time Overruns on National Highway Development Project Using Regression Analysis
M. Kishore Kumar and Ch Hanumantha Rao
39
Influence of Randomly Distributed Nylon Fibers Mixed with Fly Ash in Black Cotton Soil
Deepak Gupta and Mrs. Vandana Tare
44
51
Announcement
52
Development of Pay Factors for Dense Graded Bituminous Mixes by Relating Construction Quality to Performance
Deepak Baskandi, A. Veeraragavan and Rajib B. Mallick
68
76
87
No part of this publication may be reproduced by any means without prior written permission from the Secretary General, IRC.
Edited and Published by Shri S.N. Das on behalf of the Indian Roads Congress (IRC), New Delhi. The responsibility of the contents and the
opinions expressed in Indian Highways is exclusively of the author/s concerned. IRC and the Editor disclaim responsibility and liability for any
statement or opinion, originality of contents and of any copyright violations by the authors. The opinions expressed in the papers and contents
published in the Indian Highways do not necessarily represent the views of the Editor or IRC.
EDITORIAL
management and safety were taken up. These research schemes provided very useful information for
cost-effective solutions to the problems faced on the ground, and led to development of several design
guidelines and standards suited to Indian conditions. The innovations and developments have resulted in
significant savings and improvements in road infrastructure in developed countries.
While systematic visionary research could not be initiated at par with the taking up of the huge road
development initiative in the country since 2000. The shortfall in research has led to a very undesirable
condition of our roads and a failure to get the benefits of new materials, technology and processes. As contrast,
the US for example invested millions of dollars in research in nineties and their present return is counted in
billions. Our investment in road research is negligible compared to the huge investments in road construction.
The neglect so far due to not realizing the real value and benefits of road research is quite unfortunate.
This gap should be addressed on an emergent basis in the country. The research and development is crucial
for the socio-economic growth of a country. Innovations are important for faster development, so that the
innovations will result in cost effective solutions which will provide better performing and safer highways in
the country.
As technologies are changing at a fast pace, we must come with new ideas, learn from our experiences
and develop the capacity to compete and innovate user friendly technologies. The various components of
R&D strategy should be improvement in design, modernization of construction techniques, introduction of
improved materials conforming to latest standards, evolving better and appropriate specifications, encouraging
development and use of new technologies, use of marginal materials, etc. The basic aim of research should be
to develop durable infrastructure and elements to improve in-service performance, reduce maintenance needs
and costs, reduce life-cycle costs and significantly use of new technologies and marginal materials etc.
The main thrust of research and development (R&D) in the roads sector is to build a sustainable and
environment friendly road infrastructure comparable with the best roads in the world. To build such roads, our
existing technology policy needs to be reformulated in the light of the scenarios emerging from technological
development taking place elsewhere in the world, increased traffic, depleting sources of construction materials,
environmental damage and aesthetic consideration. We need to be more aggressive in acquiring and applying
advanced technologies in wide range of fields, including roads, bridges, tunnels, traffic-transportation and
incident management.
Investment in road research should be viewed as a long term investment, to put the country on higher pedestal
in the field of highways. It is well established that investment in road research gives larger benefits. Often it
is seen that research schemes take a lot of time to commence after their identification and taking the research
work to a logical completion also takes considerable time. There is a need to evolve a strategy to reduce this
time period and put R&D activities on a fast track. It is essential to shorten the time taken in award of the
research work and in implementing them by following a comprehensive monitoring system which should also
solve the bottlenecks, when faced, while carrying out research work. Further, there are many organizations
in the country which are involved in the R&D activities. There is an urgent need to coordinate all these
R&D activities to avoid duplication of research work and their dissemination for effective application of the
available results in the field.
Place :
Dated :
New Delhi
29th August, 2014
S.N. Das
EDITORIAL
Meet the Office Bearers
of the INdian Roads Congress
Shri S.N. Das did B.Sc. Engineering (Mechanical) in 1st Class with distinction in the year 1979
from Muzaffarpur Institute of Technology, Bihar University, Muzaffarpur. After completion of his
Graduation, he joined M/s Rohatas Industries, Dalmianagar, Bihar as a Mechanical Engineer.
He has worked in the Ministry of Road Transport & Highways on various capacities and has
completed many important projects.
Shri S.N. Das was promoted to the post of Chief Engineer (Mech.) in October 2008 in the Ministry
of Road Transport and Highways. From 12th June 2012 to 18th January, 2013 he was given Additional
Charge of Director, Indian Academy of Highways Engineers, Noida. He was promoted to the post
of Additional Director General, Ministry of Road Transport & Highways w.e.f. 5.12.2012. He also
dealt with the Projects in North Eastern Region. From 14.03.2014, he was posted in S&R Zone,
Roads & Bridges and Mechanical Zone.
He is the Convenor of HSS, BSS and GSS Appex Committees of IRC and Chairman of Highways
Research Board. He is also the Convenor of Mechanization Committee (G-4) of Indian Roads
Congress from the year 2009. He has been Instrumental in formation of important IRC documents
relating to Mechanization.
Shri S.N. Das was elevated to the post of Director General (Road Development) in Ministry of Road
Transport and Highways on 1st August, 2014. He is also the Honorary Treasurer of the Indian Roads
Congress.
___________
SHRI C. KANDASAMY
Past-President
Shri C. Kandasamy joined Central Engineering Service (Roads) of Government of India in 1976 and have
held various positions in the Ministry of Road Transport and Highways as well as in the National Highways
Authority of India.
He was on deputation with National Highways Authority of India as General Manager and was associated
with Phase-I of NHDP (Golden Quadrilateral). As Chief General Manager Shri Kandasamy was involved in
Phase II of NHDP (North South & East West Corridors). He took most of the projects under his jurisdiction
in North-South corridor through the BOT model. As Member (Technical), NHAI, he was incharge of Phase III
(BOT) of NHDP projects. In his long and illustrious career spanning over 35 years, Shri Kandasamy has been
involved in all aspects of development of National Highways including implementation of NHDP.
Shri C. Kandasamy held various positions in the Ministry and elevated to the post of Director General
(Road Development) and Special Secretary in December 2011.
Shri C. Kandasamy is a Life Member of the Indian Roads Congress. He is an eminent engineer of repute and
is closely associated with the Technical Committees of Indian Roads Congress. He is also instrumental in
preparation of IRC Codes, Specifications, Manuals etc.
Shri C. Kandasamy was President of the Indian Roads Congress during 2013 and at present its Past
President.
EDITORIAL
Meet The Office Bearers
of The Indian Roads Congress
Sri Ajoy Chandra Bordoloi has been elected as the Vice
President of the Indian Roads Congress during its 74th Annual
Session held at Guwahati (Assam) in 2014.
ANNOUNCEMENT
International Seminar on Road Safety for Inclusive and Sustainable
Development Current Practice and Perspective
on 24th & 25 th November, 2014 at India Habitat Centre, New Delhi
Organizers : Indian Roads Congress (IRC), World Road Association (PIARC), Global Road Safety Facility
(The World Bank), Ministry of Road Transport and Highways and International Road Federation. (India Chapter)
Who should attend : Central/State Government Ministries/Departments/Agencies, Public Sector Undertakings, Autonomous Organizations, Law Enforcement Agencies, Traffic Police, Research/Academic Institutions,
Road Sector Project executing agencies both from Government and Private Sector including Concessionaires/
Transporters/Cargo Movers/Fleet Operators, Automobile Manufacturers, Devices Manufacturers, NGOs,
Emergency Medical Service Providers & Insurance Companies, etc.
Plenary Session
Road Safety Action Plan, Strategy for Implementation
Inclusive Safety Protecting Vulnerable Road Users
Crash Response, Trauma Care Facility, Investigation, Data Analysis to Include Accident Recording,
Analysis Systems, Crash Testing Facilities and Parameters, etc.
Improving Road Behavior through Enforcement, Education & Awareness
Innovative ways of Financing in Road Safety
Session 7:
Panel Discussion & Summing up with Implementable Recommendations Short Term & Long Term
For submitting Technical Papers (Words limit 2000 only)
Please contact Shri R.V. Patil, Asst. Director (Technical), IRC (email: rahulpatil@irc.org.in) Tel. 011 2671 6778.
Registration Fee:
(i)
(ii)
(iii)
Opportunity available for Advertisers Opportunity available for Sponsorship Opportunity available for
Registration
For further details and enquiry for getting associated with the International Seminar, please contact Shri D. Sam Singh, Under Secretary, IRC,
E-mail: samsingh@irc.org.in, Tel. No.: 2617 1548 & Shri S.K. Chadha, Under Secretary (I/c), IRC, E-mail: ircseminar@gmail.com, Tel. No.: 2338 7140.
JUST RELEASED
The following IRC Publications were released during the 203rd Council Meeting of IRC on 19th August, 2014:
S. No.
Code No.
Price (Rs.)
Postage (Rs.)
1.
IRC:83-2014 (Pt. IV) Standard Specifications and Code of Practice for Road Bridges
Section-IX Bearings (Spherical and Cylindrical)
600.00
40.00
2.
IRC:116-2014
400.00
30.00
3.
IRC:SP:42-2014
800.00
40.00
4.
IRC:SP:49-2014
Guidelines for the use of Dry Lean Concrete as Sub-Base for Rigid
Pavement (First Revision)
400.00
30.00
5.
IRC:SP:84-2014
1000.00
50.00
6.
IRC:SP:101-2014
600.00
30.00
7.
IRC:SP:102-2014
800.00
40.00
Above publications can be purchased on line through IRC website www.irc.org.in or from office of Indian Roads Congress, Jamnagar House, Shahjahan Road,
New Delhi-110011 or Kama Koti Marg, R.K. Puram, New Delhi-110022. For further inquiry please contact Tel No. 23386274 E-mail: sale@irc.org.in.
Welcoming Honble Minister of Road Transport & Highways, Shipping & Rural Development,
Govt. of India Shri Nitin Jairam Gadkari Ji
10
11
Honble Minister of Road Transport & Highways, Shipping & Rural Development, Govt. of India being welcomed in a
traditional manner with Shawl by President, IRC, Shri Sunil Bhowmik
Secretary to the Govt. of India, Ministry of Road Transport & Highways Shri Vijay Chhibber being welcomed in a traditional
manner with Shawl by Director General (Road Development) Ministry of Road Transport & Highways and
Hony. Treasurer of IRC, Shri S.N. Das,
12
Shri Nitin Jairam Gadkari Ji, Honble Minister of Road Transport & Highways, Shipping & Rural Development,
Govt. of India in his Inaugural address stated that he has promised to Honble Prime Minister Shri Narendra Modi Ji that
Road Transport, Shipping and Inland Waterways will exert all efforts to add Two Percent extra to the GDP of the country.
Speaking about highway network he said that 19 out of 51 road projects had to be dropped for different reasons. He
invited the attention of all stakeholders for speeding up the process to achieve the target of building 30 kms of highways
per day in the next two years. Admitting that impediments like land acquisition, environmental clearances by Ministry
of Environment and Forest and ROB clearance by Railways had stalled many projects, the Minister informed that about
80 percent of the projects stalled for lack of environment and forest clearances have been resolved and land acquisition
process and clearances from Railways and Defence are being expedited. Praising the efforts of the Indian Roads Congress
for the overall development in road sector in the country, the Honble Minister urged the Indian Roads Congress to
concentrate on Research and Development for maximizing the use of locally available materials for speedy and durable
construction of roads and bridges in the country. He said, this is the right time for the road sector to come up to the
expectation of the nation and that there will be no dearth of funds including foreign funding but he emphasized that all
should focus on time-bound completion of projects.
13
Address by Director General (Road Development), Ministry of Road Transport & Highways and
Hony. Treasurer, IRC
Shri S.N. Das, Director General (Road Development),
Ministry of Road Transport & Highways in his address
mentioned that good road transport system is one of the
indicators of the countrys economic and industrial growth.
The overall improvement in road sector in India is indeed
synonymous with the country growth, at large. Today
the roads have to sustain heavy traffic and road industry
is more conscious about various aspects of sustainability
and deeply committed to promoting new innovations
and initiating R&D in road sector. To build world class
roads in the country we need to reformulate our existing
technology policy in the light of the emerging international
trends, diffusion of technologies and keep pace with more
demanding international standards for cost, quality and
productivity. The Government has also made substantial
efforts to tackle the highways sectors shortcomings and to reform its transport institutions. Highway development
fosters inclusive growth, it promotes overall development of the region, provides direct/indirect employment to skilled/
semi-skilled/unskilled workers all along the region served by the highway.
14
Vote of Thanks by Vice President, IRC Shri N.K. Pradhan, Engineer-in-Chief cum Secretary, PWD Odisha
Shri N.K. Pradhan, Vice-President, IRC proposed a Vote
time not by chance but as a necessity to achieve higher
of Thanks to the Honble Minister of Road Transport &
inclusive growth of Indian economy, therefore, there
Highways, Shipping & Rural Development, Secretary,
is a need to have an investment-cum-financing-cum
Ministry of Road Transport & Highways, President,
governance strategy and simultaneously corresponding
IRC, Director General (Road Development), Ministry
interlinked
deliverance
infrastructure
for
its
of Road Transport & Highways, Vice-Presidents of IRC,
operationalization in a meaningful way and the fraternity
Council Members, Members of Technical Committees
of Indian Roads Congress is struggling hard to make these
and distinguished guests who had graced the Inaugural
endeavors a grand success. He also thanked the press and
Function. He mentioned that road sector in the country
media for their wide coverage of this event.
will continue to remain a sunrise sector for coming
15
Council Meeting
The Council in its 203rd Meeting approved the following draft Standards/Guidelines :
(iv)
(i)
(ii)
(iii)
16
In the end Presentations on Cement Stabilized Fly Ash for Sub-base and Base Layers of Flexible
Pavements by Dr. Vasant G. Havangi, CRRI and A Mechanism for Generation of Road Safety Fund by
Prof. P.K. Sarkar, SPA were also made.
Highway Research Board
17
INTRODUCTION
**
i)
ii)
18
TECHNICAL PAPERS
The main functions of the sub base layer in pavements
are as follows:
1)
k=
QL
Aht
2)
Where,
3)
4)
TECHNICAL PAPERS
On the other hand, Elsayed et al. (1996) stated that
percent crushed faces had no significant effect on
permeability. Thus, there is some uncertainty on
the effect of percent crushed faces on permeability.
Nonetheless, fractured faces are very important for the
construction and stability of open-graded aggregates
since they provide mechanical interlock between the
particles. H. R. Cedergren (1994) reported that the
life of a poorly drained pavement is reduced to one
third or less of the life of a well-drained pavement.
He also stated that the permeability increases 40,000
times if the drainage layer material is coarse, opengraded aggregates of 0.5 to 1.0 inch instead of sand.
Hoppe (1996) stated that the fines content do not exert
a statistically significant influence on permeability. In
his opinion, the coefficient of uniformity is a better
predictor of the permeability. This variable describes
the particle size distribution of the material. He
showed that increasing the coefficient of uniformity
decreased permeability. He also concluded that for
coefficient of uniformities from 10 to 115, improved
drainage may be achieved by using subbases with a
low coefficient of uniformity with no unfavorable
impact on strength.
Tests on Aggregates
Aggregate crushing value
Los Angeles Abrasion value
Aggregate impact value
Specific gravity
Water absorption (%)
Test Results
15.10 %
28.61 %
15.90 %
2.65
0.70
Tests on Aggregates
Aggregate crushing value
Los Angeles Abrasion value
Aggregate impact value
Specific gravity
Water absorption (%)
Test Results
16.1 %
27.45 %
18.55 %
2.78
0.25
Tests on Aggregates
Aggregate crushing value
Los Angeles Abrasion value
Aggregate impact value
Specific gravity
Water absorption (%)
Test Results
11.2 %
28.96 %
14.60 %
2.61
0.65
2 Material Selection
2.1
Aggregates
Upper Limit
100
100
90
65
55
40
25
10
Lower
Limit
100
80
55
35
25
20
10
3
Adopted
Gradation
100
90
72.5
50
40
30
17.5
6.5
TECHNICAL PAPERS
2.2
Fibre
Particulars
Value
Molecular formula of
polypropylene
(CH2-CH2)
Shape
Average diameter
Aspect ratio
100
Specific gravity
0.9
Straight Ends
0.3 mm
Fig. 3 MDD for GSB Mixes with Varying Lime Content
2.3 Lime
In the present study, hydrated lime was subjected to
specific gravity test. The specific gravity of lime is
2.69.
3 Laboratory Investigation and
Interpretation of Results
3.1
21
TECHNICAL PAPERS
Addition of lime to GSB mixes increases OMC and
MDD. The MDD value increases with lime content
because the specific gravity of lime is higher than
the specific gravity of material replaced. Also, lime
improves the gradation of the GSB mixes by filling
the voids. The increase in OMC with lime content
is attributed to the increase in OH ion concentration
which modifies the surfaces of aggregate particles and
increases the water associated by them. Same trend
is reported in State of Art Lime Stabilisation HRB.
In case of Polypropylene fibre, the OMC values are
increasing and the MDD values are decreasing with
increasing percentages of polypropylene fibre when
added to GSB mixes. The increase in OMC with
fibre content is due to adsorption of water particles
on the surface of polypropylene fibre. Same trend
was reported by Pateriya and Patil (2009). The MDD
value decreases with fibre content due to lower value
of specific gravity of fibre.
3.2
22
TECHNICAL PAPERS
accurate determination of permeability by this method.
Water is allowed to flow through the sample from a tank
designed to keep the water level constant by overflow.
The quantity of water flowing out or discharge Q during
a given time t is collected in a vessel and weighed.
Figs. 8 and 9 show permeability values for GSB mixes
with varying lime and fibre respectively.
2.
3.
4.
5.
References
Fig. 8 Permeability Results of GSB Mixes with
Varying Lime Content
Conclusions
Addition of lime to GSB mixes increases OMC,
MDD, CBR and decreases permeability values.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
Laboratory
Determination
23
of
INTRODUCTION
**
24
ANALYSIS
PROJECTS
OF
NHDP
HIGHWAY
TECHNICAL PAPERS
Implementation (MOS&PI). The various details of
the ongoing highway packages furnished by Project
Implementation Units (PIUs) of the monitoring
agency National Highway Authority of India (NHAI)
are tabulated at Annexure I. Quantitative data viz.,
name of road stretch being improved to four lane or
six lane, National Highway Route No, length in kms,
Date of Approval was reproduced from the status
reports. Time overrun in months was arrived at by
deducting the original stipulated period of completion
from the expected duration as on the date of reporting.
Hence the time overrun, for instance in the case of
16 km long stretch of Lucknow-Kanpur highway
on NH 25 in the state of Uttar Pradesh being
improved to four lane road under East West Corridor
project (listed at Srl No 1 in Annexure I), the time
overrun was assessed as 78 months in the status
report pertaining to March 2008. Whereas the same
has ascended to 96 months when the reports were
compiled after two years in Mar 2010. As may be seen
from the Annexure I, the dismal state of time overruns
not only continued but escalated in a majority of
cases.
Apart from the quantitative data, the status reports
carried descriptive picture furnished by PIUs such
as reasons for delays. Broadly the causes of delay
brought out by PIUs were land acquisition, utility
shifting, poor contractor performance, termination
of contract, late conclusion of contract, rains/floods,
law & order problems, and delays in approvals of
bridges ROB/RUBs. While tabulating the data at
Annexure I, numeral 1 was inserted under the
respective columns where the project was delayed
on account of those reasons for delay. The following
illustration helps in understanding the methodology
adopted in tabulation.
Lucknow-Kanpur highway on NH 25 at Srl No 1 in the
Annexure I was stated to be delayed on account of poor
INDIAN HIGHWAYS, September 2014
TECHNICAL PAPERS
Table 1 State wise Statistics on Delays in Highway Projects as on March 2008
State/Provincial
Administrative Unit
Highway
Packages
Late Conclusion
of Contract
Rains/Floods
ROB Approvals
Assam
25
634
53.10
14
28
21
14
13
20
Andhra Pradesh
14
691
43.22
Bihar
16
566
42.58
23
32
12
Chhattisgarh
131
10.78
Delhi
112
6.20
15
Gujarat
525
34.17
14
Haryana
144
12.42
11
22
Jammu Kashmir
138
8.40
18
33
Jharkhand
79
3.99
42
63
Karnataka
14
527
40.93
21
28
Length
(km)
Termination of
Contract
Status
Report
2010
Contractor Poor
Performance
Status
Report
2008
Utility Shifting
Cost
(Rs.
billion)
No of Projects Affected by
Land Acquisition
No
Kerala
57
9.75
23
Maharashtra
12
460
32.85
19
28
Madhya Pradesh
16
821
41.77
16
Uttar Pradesh
36
1128
82.04
13
15
Orissa
274
14.39
49
53
Punjab
169
12.90
15
Rajasthan
15
780
51.13
Tamil Nadu
33
1596
108.20
16
13
12
West Bengal
Total
2
224
58
8890
3.40
612.22
0
14
47
32
72
44
1
54
1
17
27
29
22
Mean Delay
(Months)
[Status
Report 2010]
Contractor Poor
Performance
Termination of
Contract
ROB Approvals
No of Projects Affected by
Golden Quadrilateral
25
43
37
10
16
79
15
23
37
20
19
12
28
20
Phase III
26
-12
12
Rains/Floods
Mean Delay
(Months)
[Status Report
2008]
Late Conclusion
of Contract
No of Highway
Packages
Land
Acquisition
NHDP Phase
Utility Shifting
MORT&H
11
15
66
12
21
17
13
14
Other Roads
10
20
Port Connectivity
10
21
2
224
0
14
0
32
72
44
54
17
27
29
22
Phase V (6 Laning)
Total
26
TECHNICAL PAPERS
3
= COVxy/SxSy
a)
TECHNICAL PAPERS
b)
c)
d)
e)
TECHNICAL PAPERS
Table 3 Weightages for Delay Factors
Assam
21
14
13
Bihar
12
Chhattisgarh
Delhi
Gujarat
Haryana
Jharkhand
Karnataka
Kerala
Madhya Pradesh
Maharashtra
Orissa
(4) /
Total
(4)
(5) /
Total
(5)
(6) /
Total
(6)
(7) /
Total
(7)
(8) /
Total
(8)
(9) /
Total
(9)
0.000
0.000
0.019
0.059
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
20
0.292
0.318
0.074
0.000
0.148
0.448
0.909
0.000
0.083
0.091
0.093
0.000
0.037
0.414
0.045
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.019
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.074
0.000
0.000
0.103
0.000
0.111
0.014
0.023
0.019
0.059
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.042
0.136
0.056
0.000
0.037
0.000
0.000
0.222
0.014
0.023
0.019
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.045
0.000
0.014
0.023
0.037
0.176
0.037
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.019
0.059
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.028
0.045
0.037
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.069
0.068
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.333
0.056
0.000
0.093
0.235
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
Punjab
0.028
0.045
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
Rajasthan
0.097
0.000
0.056
0.000
0.333
0.000
0.000
0.000
Tamil Nadu
13
12
0.181
0.023
0.222
0.176
0.259
0.034
0.000
0.000
Uttar Pradesh
0.083
0.205
0.148
0.176
0.148
0.000
0.000
0.333
West Bengal
0.000
0.000
0.019
0.059
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
72
44
54
17
27
29
22
Total
ROB Approvals
(3) /
Total
(3)
(2) /
Total
(2)
(1)
Rains/Floods
ROB Approvals
Andhra Pradesh
Rains/Floods
(6)
Late Conclusion
of Contract
(5)
Termination of
Contract
(4)
Contractor Poor
Performance
Late Conclusion
of Contract
(3)
Utility Shifting
Termination of
Contract
(2)
Land Acquisition
Contractor Poor
Performance
Weightages
Utility Shifting
State
TECHNICAL PAPERS
= 0.01 and 0.05 signifies confidence level of 99%
and 95% respectively. From statistical point of view,
correlation coefficient is preferred to be above 0.600
with confidence level of 95%. In the case of 3 states
viz., Chhattisgarh, Delhi and Jharkhand, computation
was not possible due to fewer than 2 variables and
Assam
Andhra Pradesh
Bihar
Chhattisgarh
Delhi
Gujarat
Haryana
Jammu & Kashmir
Jharkhand
Karnataka
Kerala
Maharashtra
Madhya Pradesh
Uttar Pradesh
Orissa
Punjab
Rajasthan
Tamil Nadu
West Bengal
30
Data
Pertaining to
Regression Equation Y = a + b X
Coeff of
Correlation R
Significance
0.835
0.185
0.087
0.004
0.038
0.067
0.025
0.003
0.008
0.098
0.000
0.026
0.020
0.859
0.386
0.953
0.153
0.250
0.523
TECHNICAL PAPERS
Illustration of Delay Index Model :
Name of Project
: Kadapa-Mydukur-Kurnool
Length
: 188.752 kms
National Highway
: NH 18
Project Cost
: `1585 crore
NHDP Phase
: III
Letter of Acceptance (LOA) : Feb 2009
Date of Commencement
: Nov 2010
Scheduled Completion by : May 2013
Present Progress
: 70% (as on Jul 2013)
Expected Completion by
: Mar 2014 (as intimated by PIU)
Contractor
: KMC & IVRCL Consortium
Independent Engineer (IE) : Aarevee Associates Architects
Mode of Execution
: BOT (Toll)
CONCLUSION
TECHNICAL PAPERS
as in quantitative terms. Moreover the accuracy of
the results depends on the quantum of data available
with the management. As already explained, in the
MOS&PI status report containing 224 projects,
no information regarding the causes of delay was
available for as many as 101 projects. In this situation,
SARDP -NE
Port
Connectivity
Others
Total by NHAI
6500
1000
700
14799
48096
388
380
1390
50254
5846
(100%)
6146
1540
(24%)
(86%)
5491
(45%)
21
(3%)
24
(1.6%)
20872
69
374
1126 20872
(43%) (18%) (98%) (81%) (42%)
Under Implementation
(km.)
751
6314
2763
20
2549
12145
43
244
12500
Contracts Under
Implementation (No.)
66
54
13
18
212
233
420
2363
2919
1000
659
12250
15660
276
20
15956
NHDP Phase
IV
12109
NHDP Phase
VII
7142
NS EW Ph. I
& II
5846
GQ
NHDP Total
NHDP Phase VI
NHDP Phase V
Date of Approval
Jun 98
Dec 03
Dec 07
Dec 03
Dec 14
Mar
05
REFERENCES
1.
2.
3.
4.
32
6.
TECHNICAL PAPERS
Annexure I
31
Bihar
15
EW
Apr-00
62.98
74
98
28
Bihar
40
EW
Dec-03
239
50
68
28
Bihar
40
EW
Dec-03
275
50
68
31
Bihar
28
EW
Apr-00
205.73
50
30
EW
Dec-03
230
48
78
23
EW
Apr-00
182.52
48
75
25
Assam
Uttar
Pradesh
Uttar
Pradesh
13
EW
Dec-03
158
44
58
14
Gujarat
86
EW
Dec-03
399.89
39
15
Gujarat
107
EW
Dec-03
429
39
54
Assam
Uttar
Pradesh
26
EW
Dec-03
212
27
25
50
EW
Dec-03
340
21
33
54
31C
25 &
28
Delay in Approvals of
ROB/RUB
96
78
Rains/Floods
51.28
Poor Contractor
Performance
Termination of
Contracts
Late Conclusion of
Contracts
Apr-00
Utility Shifting
EW
Land Acquisition
16
Original Cost
(Rs in crores)
Uttar
Pradesh
Date of Approval
25
NHDP
Length (km)
State
NH
Data Base of Ongoing Highway Projects for Regression Analysis (Source : MOSP&I's Status Reports 2008 and 2010)
Delay
Index
0.3246
0.0000
0.0926
1
1
0.5064
0.5047
0.6098
1
0.3246
0.4360
0.1775
1
1
1
1
0.2146
1.3489
0.2315
Assam
34
EW
Dec-03
157.47
21
42
37
Assam
19
EW
Dec-03
245
21
33
1.9672
31
Assam
22
EW
Dec-03
160
19
31
1.9672
37
Assam
25
EW
Dec-03
264.72
18
30
8A
Gujarat
Uttar
Pradesh
36
EW
Dec-03
412
16
31
66
EW
Dec-03
451.97
16
30
Assam
28
EW
Dec-03
198
14
32
1.9672
Assam
28
EW
Dec-03
176
14
47
1.9672
Assam
27
EW
Dec-03
208
14
32
1.9672
Bihar
25
EW
Dec-03
100.5
14
23
Rajastan
31
EW
Dec-03
266
13
28
Assam
30
EW
Dec-03
195
12
Assam
33
EW
Dec-03
237.8
12
42
Assam
31
EW
Dec-03
225
12
30
Bihar
30
EW
Dec-03
291.8
12
24
Bihar
40
EW
Dec-03
305
12
24
Assam
26
EW
Dec-03
200
12
30
Assam
20
EW
Dec-03
225
12
26
Assam
15
EW
Dec-03
155
12
25
Assam
23
EW
Dec-03
167
12
25
Assam
18
EW
Dec-03
230
12
21
Assam
30
EW
Dec-03
200
12
25
Assam
25
EW
Dec-03
225
12
30
Assam
22
EW
Dec-03
142
12
Bihar
62
EW
Dec-03
310
12
1.0581
1.9672
0.1775
0.4360
0.5880
0.0278
0.0000
1.9672
0.3657
0.4138
0.6335
1.9672
0.3657
1
0.9091
0.9091
1.9672
1.2008
1.9672
30
1.9672
24
0.4971
33
47 Jhansi Shivpuri Km 50 - 15
Forbesganj Simrahi Km
48 230 - 190
Ganga Bridge-Ramadevi
49 Crossing Km 75 - 80
Jhajharpur Darbanga Km
50 110 - 70
Ayodhya Lucknow Km 135 51 93
Ayodhya Lucknow Km 45 52 8
Ayodhya Lucknow Km 93 53 45
Bakaria Gogunda KM 73 54 29
Karur Madurai Km 373.275
55 - 426.60
Gorakhpur Ayodhya Km
56 208 - 164
Gorakhpur Ayodhya Km
57 251 - 208
Land Acquisition
12
24
57
Bihar
45
EW
Dec-03
340
12
24
28
Bihar
42
EW
Dec-03
300
11
25
28
Bihar
38
EW
Dec-03
240
11
29
76
Rajastan
43
EW
Dec-03
297
11
0.4971
0.4138
0.1759
0.5064
0.0278
31
West Bengal
26
EW
Dec-03
225
11
Gujarat
72
EW
Dec-03
360
10
54
Assam
14
EW
Dec-03
280
10
8B
Gujarat
Madhya
Pradesh
65
EW
Dec-03
399.89
10
35
EW
Dec-03
213
10
Bihar
Uttar
Pradesh
40
EW
Dec-03
333
30
EW
Dec-03
155
33
40
EW
Dec-03
340
39
42
EW
Dec-03
212
24
37
EW
Dec-03
193
28
Bihar
Uttar
Pradesh
Uttar
Pradesh
Uttar
Pradesh
48
EW
Dec-03
217
76
Rajastan
44
EW
Dec-03
457
TamilNadu
Uttar
Pradesh
Uttar
Pradesh
53
NS
Dec-03
283.5
44
EW
Dec-03
227
26
0.1481
43
EW
Dec-03
239
24
0.1481
25
EW
Dec-03
275
20
21
EW
Dec-03
200
20
0.9091
28
EW
Dec-03
199.81
20
0.9091
60
EW
Dec-03
378
44
EW
Dec-03
220
25
57
25
57
28
28
7
28
28
76
Rajastan
Madhya
Pradesh
Uttar
Pradesh
Uttar
Pradesh
65 Jhansi Shivpuri Km 91 - 50
25
Kasia Gorakhpur Km 319.8
28
66 - 279.8
UP/Bihar Border - Kasia
67 Km 360.9 - 319.8
28
Chittorgarh Bypass Km 253
68 - 213
76
Rajastan
Harangajo Maibang Km
54
69 140.7 - 164.08
Assam
Kota Chittorgarh Km 316 70 253
76
Rajastan
Kota Chittorgarh Km 381 71 316
76
Rajastan
Uttar
Shivpuri Bypass upto
25&76 Pradesh
72 MP/Raj Border
Palanpur Swaroopganj Km
73 264 - 340
14
Rajastan
Raj/MP Border - Kota Km
74 579 - 509
76
Rajastan
Uttar
Bara Orai Km 449-422 &
75 Km 255-220
2&25 Pradesh
Brahmaputra Bridge Km
31
76 1126 - 1121
Assam
34
Delay
Index
8A
Delay in Approvals of
ROB/RUB
276
Dec-03
Rains/Floods
Original Cost
(Rs in crores)
EW
Poor Contractor
Performance
Termination of
Contracts
Late Conclusion of
Contracts
Date of Approval
41
Utility Shifting
NHDP
Bihar
State
57
NH
Length (km)
TECHNICAL PAPERS
23
0.0000
0.0741
22
0.9091
1
1
0.0741
0.1103
1
0.5880
0.0000
0.5064
0.4167
0.0000
24
0.0000
1
0.0000
0.0000
32
EW
Dec-03
221.82
19
EW
Dec-03
275
10
41
EW
Dec-03
220
40
EW
Dec-03
242
24
41
EW
Dec-03
227
24
40
EW
Dec-03
384
24
EW
Dec-03
196
63
EW
Dec-03
440.5
65
EW
Dec-03
446
46
EW
Dec-03
360
76
EW
Dec-03
498
70
EW
Dec-03
311
62
EW
Dec-03
465
14
EW
Dec-03
217.61
0.0278
0.0278
0.0278
0.0000
1
0.0000
0.1103
0.0000
0.0000
1
41
0.0278
1
1.0572
0.0000
0.0278
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.1481
15
36
Gujarat
10
EW
Dec-03
265
0.0000
31
West Bengal
Uttar
Pradesh
25
EW
Dec-03
155
0.0000
28
EW
Dec-03
600.24
-4
17
Orissa
54
GQ
Apr-00
225
68
90
0.3834
Karnataka
13
GQ
Apr-00
83
60
81
0.2274
Orissa
62
GQ
Apr-00
227.25
58
82
0.3834
West Bengal
GQ
Apr-00
81
58
0.0773
Orissa
Uttar
Pradesh
51
GQ
Apr-00
263.27
57
15
GQ
Apr-00
89.5
56
Karnataka
56
GQ
Apr-00
241
55
71
30
GQ
Apr-00
140.85
53
74
Orissa
Uttar
Pradesh
77
GQ
Apr-00
372.4
53
69
Karnataka
64
GQ
Apr-00
260.93
51
Karnataka
18
GQ
Apr-00
104
50
GQ
Apr-00
155
47
Orissa
Uttar
Pradesh
72
GQ
Apr-00
286
45
0.3527
Karnataka
67
GQ
Apr-00
304
44
0.0598
Jharkhand
Uttar
Pradesh
Uttar
Pradesh
Uttar
Pradesh
Uttar
Pradesh
79
GQ
Apr-00
399.75
42
63
51
GQ
Apr-00
367.49
40
69
72
GQ
Apr-00
348.44
38
12
GQ
Apr-00
468
38
13
GQ
Apr-00
495.35
37
30
GQ
Apr-00
221.87
37
57
GQ
Apr-00
261.22
37
Bihar
Uttar
Pradesh
Uttar
Pradesh
Uttar
Pradesh
Uttar
Pradesh
Karnataka
28
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
11
Delay
Index
0.4508
0.1481
0.3279
0.3246
0.0000
1
0.3834
0.1481
0.0000
69
0.1765
0.0000
0.1006
1
0.6860
0.0000
63
0.4360
0.3527
0.0000
1
GQ
Apr-00
91.36
26
GQ
Apr-00
440.93
18
44
GQ
Apr-00
534.39
13
31
77
GQ
Apr-00
318
70
Punjab
49
III
Mar-05
263
14
TamilNadu
Uttar
Pradesh
64
III
Dec-03
263
16
46
III
Mar-05
195
36
III
Mar-05
298
49
III
Mar-05
190
16
81
III
Mar-05
565
24
57
III
Mar-05
250
Madhya
Pradesh
76
40
418
Rains/Floods
Dec-03
Poor Contractor
Performance
Termination of
Contracts
Late Conclusion of
Contracts
EW
Utility Shifting
Original Cost
(Rs in crores)
10
Land Acquisition
Date of Approval
Bihar
State
NHDP
Length (km)
57
NH
Delay in Approvals of
ROB/RUB
TECHNICAL PAPERS
0.6125
0.2315
36
1
1
1
1
0.1481
1
0.7694
0.1765
0.0000
0.2593
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
III
Mar-05
450
18
0.0000
100
III
Mar-05
579
13
0.0000
80
III
Mar-05
472
0.0000
35
21
Punjab
11
Rajastan
Uttar
Pradesh
Maharashtr
a
58
Delay in Approvals of
ROB/RUB
Rains/Floods
Poor Contractor
Performance
Termination of
Contracts
Late Conclusion of
Contracts
212
Utility Shifting
Original Cost
(Rs in crores)
Mar-05
Land Acquisition
Date of Approval
III
NHDP
50
Delay
Index
0.0000
61
III
Mar-05
309
108
III
Mar-05
483
15
0.0000
79
III
Mar-05
359
15
41
III
Mar-05
168
16
0.0000
Karnataka
55
III
Mar-05
441
30
0.0000
TamilNadu
40
III
Mar-05
285
30
0.0000
0.0000
0.1481
TamilNadu
Uttar
Pradesh
136
III
Mar-05
941
30
0.0000
24
75
III
Mar-05
322
20
0.0000
Karnataka
15
III
Mar-05
110
67
TamilNadu
55
III
Mar-05
280
12
45
TamilNadu
88
III
Mar-05
576
16
0.0000
67
TamilNadu
Maharashtr
a
80
III
Mar-05
516
32
0.0000
115
III
Mar-05
556
-3
12
0.0000
45B
TamilNadu
126
III
Mar-05
629
-10
-5
Karnataka
20
Mar-05
445
-12
-3
Assam
10
Mar-05
33.78
12
Dec-03
480
11
31
44
68
TamilNadu
TamilNadu
45B
TamilNadu
61
34
West Bengal
Andhra
Pradesh
6
48
TamilNadu
55
TamilNadu
59
Assam
22
Kerala
86
III
MORT
H
MORT
H
MORT
H
MORT
H
MORT
H
MORT
H
MORT
H
MORT
H
MORT
H
MORT
H
MORT
H
36
Maharashtr
a
Length (km)
State
NH
TECHNICAL PAPERS
4,5&4
5
TamilNadu
4
SH
32
0.0000
11
11
Dec-03
261
19
Mar-06
67
28
0.0000
Dec-03
546
0.0000
Feb-06
79.52
18
0.0000
Feb-06
63
14
0.0000
Dec-03
130
Apr-07
557
0.4028
Apr-00
71
65
NS
Apr-00
82
60
85
TamilNadu
19
NS
Apr-00
82.49
58
82
Karnataka
Jammu &
kashmir
Maharashtr
a
Maharashtr
a
Maharashtr
a
Maharashtr
a
17
NS
Apr-00
172.06
53
17
NS
Apr-00
110
48
29
NS
Dec-03
145
47
27
NS
Dec-03
110
45
30
NS
Dec-03
144
30
NS
Dec-03
145
TamilNadu
Maharashtr
a
Uttar
Pradesh
17
NS
Dec-03
92.54
NS
Dec-03
26
39
NS
Dec-03
348
37
41
0.2033
0.9091
10
NS
0.0000
22
0.2150
210
13
0.3657
1
24.19
Haryana
Jan-06
Delhi
0.2593
0.0000
Jan-05
0.2593
1A
0.0000
1
1
1
0.0185
1
0.0773
0.4028
0.0000
72
0.0000
1
0.0732
57
44
59
44
65
0.0732
40
56
39
57
0.0000
0.0732
0.0278
0.4028
0.0000
21
Punjab
11
Rajastan
Uttar
Pradesh
Maharashtr
a
58
Delay in Approvals of
ROB/RUB
Rains/Floods
212
Poor Contractor
Performance
Termination of
Contracts
Late Conclusion of
Contracts
Mar-05
Utility Shifting
Original Cost
(Rs in crores)
III
Land Acquisition
Date of Approval
50
NHDP
Maharashtr
a
Length (km)
State
NH
TECHNICAL PAPERS
Delay
Index
0.0000
61
III
Mar-05
309
108
III
Mar-05
483
15
0.0000
79
III
Mar-05
359
15
41
III
Mar-05
168
16
0.0000
Karnataka
55
III
Mar-05
441
30
0.0000
TamilNadu
40
III
Mar-05
285
30
0.0000
0.0000
0.1481
TamilNadu
Uttar
Pradesh
136
III
Mar-05
941
30
0.0000
24
75
III
Mar-05
322
20
0.0000
Karnataka
15
III
Mar-05
110
67
TamilNadu
55
III
Mar-05
280
12
45
TamilNadu
88
III
Mar-05
576
16
67
TamilNadu
Maharashtr
a
80
III
Mar-05
516
32
0.0000
115
III
Mar-05
556
-3
12
0.0000
45B
TamilNadu
126
III
Mar-05
629
-10
-5
Karnataka
20
Mar-05
445
-12
-3
Assam
10
Mar-05
33.78
12
Dec-03
480
11
31
44
68
TamilNadu
TamilNadu
45B
TamilNadu
61
34
West Bengal
Andhra
Pradesh
6
48
TamilNadu
55
TamilNadu
59
Assam
22
Kerala
86
III
MORT
H
MORT
H
MORT
H
MORT
H
MORT
H
MORT
H
MORT
H
MORT
H
MORT
H
MORT
H
MORT
H
4,5&4
5
TamilNadu
4
SH
32
0.0000
Dec-03
261
19
Mar-06
67
28
0.0000
Dec-03
546
0.0000
Feb-06
79.52
18
0.0000
Feb-06
63
14
0.0000
Dec-03
130
Apr-07
557
0.2033
0.4028
0.9091
10
Apr-00
71
65
Apr-00
82
60
85
TamilNadu
19
NS
Apr-00
82.49
58
82
Karnataka
Jammu &
kashmir
Maharashtr
a
Maharashtr
a
Maharashtr
a
Maharashtr
a
17
NS
Apr-00
172.06
53
17
NS
Apr-00
110
48
29
NS
Dec-03
145
47
27
NS
Dec-03
110
45
30
NS
Dec-03
144
30
NS
Dec-03
145
TamilNadu
Maharashtr
a
Uttar
Pradesh
17
NS
Dec-03
92.54
NS
Dec-03
26
39
NS
Dec-03
348
37
41
0.0000
NS
0.2150
11
NS
0.3657
1
11
22
210
13
0.0000
24.19
Haryana
0.2593
Jan-06
Delhi
Jan-05
0.2593
0.0000
1A
0.0000
1
1
1
0.0185
1
0.0773
0.4028
0.0000
72
0.0000
1
0.0732
57
44
59
44
65
0.0732
40
56
39
57
0.0000
0.0732
0.0278
0.4028
0.0000
37
Delay in Approvals of
ROB/RUB
12
0.0000
49
NS
Dec-03
263
0.0000
38
NS
Dec-03
198
28
0.0000
55
NS
Dec-03
360
0.0000
72
NS
Dec-03
206.96
18
0.0000
42
NS
Dec-03
253.5
54
NS
Dec-03
469.8
47
NS
Dec-03
379.8
17
NS
Dec-03
62.96
24
47
NS
Dec-03
312.5
15
80
NS
Dec-03
546.15
-1
0.0000
68
NS
Dec-03
327.2
-1
0.0000
10
NS
Dec-03
270
-7
0.0000
31
NS
Dec-03
120
Other Mar-05
133
34
555
30
54
407
Rains/Floods
Dec-03
Poor Contractor
Performance
Termination of
Contracts
Late Conclusion of
Contracts
NS
Utility Shifting
Original Cost
(Rs in crores)
50
Land Acquisition
Date of Approval
NHDP
Madhya
Pradesh
Madhya
Pradesh
Madhya
Pradesh
Andhra
Pradesh
Madhya
Pradesh
Length (km)
State
NH
TECHNICAL PAPERS
Delay
Index
0.0000
16
0.0000
0.0000
1
0.1780
0.0000
49
50
0.3987
0.0000
0.0000
35
Other Apr-00
220
15
45
56
Other Apr-00
275
39
71
Other Dec-03
480
-3
40
Other Dec-03
320
-5
93
Other Dec-03
460
-6
0.2879
0.2045
0.0000
11
0.0000
0.0000
7A
TamilNadu
47
Port
Apr-00
231
40
5A
77
Port
Apr-00
428
15
54
Orissa
Maharashtr
a
14
Port
Apr-00
143
12
29
TamilNadu
Port
Apr-00
45.29
0.0000
17&48 Karnataka
37
Port
Apr-00
196.5
24
0.0000
TamilNadu
15
Port
Apr-00
76.76
0.3987
0.0556
0.0278
0.0000
47
Kerala
10
Port
Apr-00
106
44
0.0773
41
West Bengal
53
Port
Apr-00
273
66
0.0773
Gujarat
65
May-06
492
0.0000
Gujarat
84
May-06
660
0.0000
38
INTRODUCTION
**
39
TECHNICAL PAPERS
The addition of fibers to fly ash shows significant
improvement in CBR value, angle of internal friction
and modulus of sub grade reaction. A Kumar et.al.
(2007) conducted the experimental program on
geotechnical characteristics of y ash-soil specimens,
lime-soil specimens and lime y ash-soil specimens
mixed with different proportions of randomly oriented
bers. Lime and flyash were added to expansive
soil at ranges of 110% and 120% respectively
S Ayyappan et.al. (2010) explained the influence of
randomly oriented fibers on the engineering behavior
of soil. It is indentified and quantified the influence of
fibers variables (content and length) on performance
of fibers reinforced soil- fly ash specimens. Kar R.K.
et.al. (2012) studied behavior of fiber-reinforced fly
ash and fiber reinforced fly ash soil mix used as subbase material in low volume roads. In fly ash soil
mix, soil content was 10% & 20%. Fiber content was
varied from 0.1% to 0.5% by dry weight of fly ash
& fly ash soil mix with four different aspect ratio.
R.K. Sharma (2012) studied soil blended with fly
ash in range of 20-80%. The fly ash of 30% in soil is
selected for further modification with Recron fiber 3S
of length 12 mm and content in range of 0.5-1.5%.
IS Codes Used
Specific Gravity
Properties
2.3
IS Classification Soil
CI
MDD (gm/cc)
Soil
40
OMC %
20
CBR %
2.4
Liquid Limit %
44
Plastic limit %
21
Plasticity Index %
23
35
3.2
Fly Ash
3 MATERIALS USED
3.1
1.25
Properties
Test Results
IS Code Used
Specific Gravity
IS Classification of
Fly Ash
SP
MDD (gm/cc)
1.19
OMC %
24
CBR %
3.3
TECHNICAL PAPERS
3.3
Nylon Fibers
Photo 1
4
ANALYSIS OF RESULTS
The soil is replaced with fly ash in different percentage
i.e. 20%, 40%, 60%, and 80%. The MDD-OMC and
CBR values of soil fly ash mixture are determined.
The optimum value of soil & fly ash mixture is further
stabilized with nylon fibers with different percentage
0.5 %, 1% 1.5% & aspect ratio 40, 50, 60 and moisture
density relation, CBR values are evaluated. Table 3
shows properties of soil fly ash mixture.
Table 3 Properties of Soil Fly Ash Mixtures
% OF FLY
ASH
20
40
60
80
MDD
(KN/M3)
14.52
15.21
13.93
12.75
OMC
(%)
17
18
20
22
UNSOAKED SOAKED
(CBR)
(CBR)
5.2
2.9
6
3.8
5.9
3.1
4.9
2.32
Table 4 Properties of Soil Fly Ash Nylon Fibers Mixtures for Different Aspect Ratio and Fiber Content
Aspect Ratio
L/D = 60
L/D = 50
L/D = 40
Fibre Content %
0.5
1
1.5
0.5
1
1.5
0.5
1
1.5
Mdd (gm/cc)
1.55
1.34
1.27
1.51
1.42
1.33
1.56
1.47
1.37
OMC (%)
23.3
25.2
27.0
24.3
26.2
27.8
25.4
27.6
29.8
TECHNICAL PAPERS
Fig. 8. The strength in terms of CBR increases even with
decrease in MDD, this is due to soil fiber interaction
instead of interaction between soil grains. It was found
that increasing in fiber aspect ratio more than 60 is
difficult to mix in soil because balling of fibers take
place and fibers may not straight. But at low aspect ratios
length of fibers are insufficient to develop frictional
resistance.
Fig. 4 Variation of CBR Fly Ash Content in Soil
4.4
42
S. No.
Aspect Ratio
Equations
40
50
60
Where,
CBR = California Bearing Ratio, P = Percentage of
Fibers
TECHNICAL PAPERS
The regression equations for the trends of the variation
of CBR for each type of mixes have been found out to
correlate CBR value with different percentage of nylon
fibers. Equations developed are given in Table 6.
CONCLUSIONS
REFERENCES
S. No.
% Fiber Content
Equations
0.5
1.5
Where,
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
43
INTRODUCTION
**
Chief Scientist,
2.1
44
TECHNICAL PAPERS
condition. Sometimes the distressed bridges fell with
calamitous failure and claimed lives. In many cases,
superstructure of the bridge is in distress. Particularly,
in girder bridges, main girders, cross girders and deck
slab are separated, which disturb the load distribution
of bridges. This resulted in receiving high magnitude
of horizontal movement and rotation at bearings. This
further lead to non functioning of bearings such as
toppling of bearings, shifting of bearings from their
original positions. Secondly, local damages such as
isolated concrete cracks, nicks and spalling up to
3 cm depth. These lead into damaging concrete cover
and cause corrosion of reinforcing steel. In case of
wide cracks and wide spalls, prestressing strand in
girders use to expose to environment. Though they
may not affect the structural capacity, they can reduce
the structural capacity due to corrosion. There are
severe damages such as corrosion damage in concrete
and prestressing strands. There may be severe pitting
or breaking of strand wires. This can cause losses
in prestress and reduction in load carrying capacity
of the member. Corrosion of prestressing strands is
much faster than that of rebar due to stress corrosion
phenomena. In some bridges, expansion joints are
not provided as per design. This cause damage to
the top surface of deck slab mainly at the junction of
two spans and leakages of rain water through gap led
to further deterioration of concrete and corrosion of
reinforcement. In addition, there are cracks in cement
concrete wearing course, and deck slabs have pot
holes and spalling of concrete.
2.2
Distress in Bearings
TECHNICAL PAPERS
therefore the integrity of the bridge becomes highly
disturbed.
Distress in foundation happens only in river bridges
due to erosion and scouring. Mining of river near
foundation exposed the open foundation. In some
cases massive uncontrolled quarrying creates large
excavated trenches in downstream side of bridges.
This further leads to heavy scouring in the bed of
the river, which finally result in exposing of open
foundation and settlement of pier. Sheoran R.R and
Singla B.S. (2010) reported that Bridge over Markanda
River on SH-4 in District Ambala (Haryana), Bridge
on Trilokpur-Khetpurali Road in Panchkula district
(Haryana) and Bridge over Jhajjra River in Panchkula
dist (Haryana) were failed due to distress in foundation.
Also they suggested that only a bridge with deep
foundation is safe rather than open well foundation to
prevent damage from mining, scouring, exposing of
foundation and settlement of pier.
3
SOLUTIONS
TECHNICAL PAPERS
sign of distress even after strengthening using this
technique in some cases. Therefore, it is imperative
to study the behavior of strengthened member after
strengthening. An experimental investigation to study
the post-strengthening behavior of concrete members
strengthened by external prestressing is explained in
the following section.
3.3
TECHNICAL PAPERS
TECHNICAL PAPERS
60% and 86% of deflection recovered due to external
prestressing for EPS B7 and EPS B9. This is the
greatest advantage of the external prestressing when
it is applied for strengthening a distressed concrete
beam.
TECHNICAL PAPERS
Loading was started immediately after completing
the external prestressing process. The load started
from 9.5 kN, as this was the load retained and
applied external prestressing. Maximum strain in
reinforcing steel has occurred in the same location
in which the maximum strain occurred in the prestrengthening stage. Concrete crushing also occur in
the same location. The location was one of the two
point loads. At first, the old crack has opened and then
new cracks were developed. It was observed that the
stiffness of the beam is increased due to the effect of
external prestressing. The maximum load went up to
78 kN and 81 kN for specimens EPS B7 and EPS B9
respectively before they fail due to concrete crushing
in the extreme compressive fibre. The Load-deflection
behaviour at before and after strengthening is plotted
and shown in Figs. 9 and 10 for specimens EPS B7
and EPS B9 respectively. Strengthening by trapezoidal
tendon profile of external prestressing has increased
the ultimate flexural load carrying capacity by 53%
and 59% for EPS B7 and EPS B9 respectively.
50
CONCLUSIONS
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
TECHNICAL PAPERS
7.
5.
ACNOWLEDGEMENTS
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
REFERENCES
1.
2.
3.
4.
12.
13.
14.
ANNOUNCEMENT
Sales Centre of IRC Publications is being operational at Tripura State Centre, Agartala (Tripura West)
from 20th July, 2013. This is a collaboration as IRC endeavor to enhance its reach to the Engineering
Fraternity.
The esteem members of IRC in Eastern Region are requested to take advantage of this new initiative.
The contact address of Sales Centre of IRC Publications is the Institution of Engineers (India),
Tripura State Centre, Pandit Nehru Complex, Gurkhabasti, Agartala, Tripura (West), Pin- 799006,
Tel: (0381) 2304700.
OBITUARY
The Indian Roads Congress express their profound sorrow on the sad demise of Late Shri Baldeo Raj Salwan
resident of F.No.415, Type A3, Tower-6, Silver City, Purvanchal Society, Sector 93, Noida (U.P.). He was
an active member of the Indian Roads Congress.
May his soul rest in peace.
INDIAN HIGHWAYS, September 2014
51
1 Background
The goal in any highway project is to construct a
pavement that is durable and performs satisfactorily
throughout its expected design life. Well-calibrated
design and good construction quality are the two most
significant factors contributing towards pavement
performance. Construction quality is a major factor
influencing the future performance of the pavements
under varying traffic loading and environmental
influences. Pavements are designed and constructed
to sustain a specified number of traffic loads. Ideally,
a pavement section that is designed with a particular
cross section for design traffic and constructed with
materials as per the specifications should perform
uniformly throughout the design life. However, road
pavements develop distresses randomly in different
sub-sections of the road length. Variability in
construction quality is one of the prime reasons for this
random development of distress. When a pavement is
not constructed to the desired specifications, it may
**
*** Professor, Civil and Environmental Engineering Department, Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Worcester, MA, USA,
E-mail: rajib@wpi.edu
52
TECHNICAL PAPERS
To establish a link between construction parameters
and pavement performance, it is necessary that one
understands the influence of various construction
parameters viz., both individual effect and their
interaction effects on pavement performance.
Performance based pay-factor adjustment approach is
difficult to develop, but provide complete means of
compensation for a developed product. Its purpose is
to establish a specification that would result in a better
quality product and in this, the quality characteristics
are related to the performance of the product. The
aim of performance based pay factor evaluation is
to optimize the pavement construction cost to its
performance. Considering the complexities involved
in its development which involves, establishing links
between quality characteristics (binder content, air
void content/density, layer thickness etc.), material
properties (modulus, tensile strength etc), and
performance (initiation and progression of pavement
distress), the performance based pay adjustment
approach has still not been successfully adopted in
India and hence the need for the present study.
Unlike in method related specifications or end result
specifications where, the quantity and quality of
work are well defined, in performance based pay
factor specifications, the onus of estimating the future
performance of the pavement lies with the contracting
agency. Prediction of future pavement behaviour to
reasonable accuracy based on the construction quality
achieved and quantifying the influence of those
construction and engineering properties is neither well
defined nor fully understood. Although several studies
have been carried out in other countries, there is a
need to understand the relationships between material
properties and performance as a first step towards the
development of rational pay factors for bituminous
mixes that are used in India.
2 OBJECTIVES AND SCOPE
The objectives of this study are to:
1.
2.
3.
1.
2.
3.
TECHNICAL PAPERS
derived in step 3; 5 development of pay
factor adjustments.
3 LITERATURE REVIEW
The long-term performance of a Hot Mix Asphalt
(HMA) pavement is significantly impacted by the
properties of the HMA mixture. Root1 observed
that many pavement failures are not caused by poor
mix design methods but are the manifestation of
poor specification control during production and
construction. Weed2 explained that pay schedules
are of two types, namely, stepped or continuous.
Weed3 stated that in order to achieve consistency,
and make performance based pay-factor adjustment
approach more effective and defensible, there is a
need for a method to relate as-built quality to expected
performance, which can then be translated into
monetary value by engineering-economic procedures.
Monismith et al.4 provided a rational and feasible
method for qualitatively establishing penalties/
bonuses for asphalt concrete construction and
described a procedure to establish pay factors for
asphalt concrete pavements. In a research carried
out by Sebaaly and Bazi5 to analyze the impact of
construction variability on pavement performance,
it was observed that construction variability
significantly affects the pavement performance
irrespective of the aggregate source and binder type.
Regardless of how well the mix design have been
prepared, the properties of the materials delivered
to the job site, such as gradation, binder content and
air voids will ultimately control the behaviour of
the pavement under the combined action of traffic
and environment. Abdallah et al.6 observed that
the methodology for development of performance
based pay factor evaluation needs to be based on
construction parameters which essentially comprise
of asphalt content, compaction, density and air voids.
The NCHRP Report 7047 is considered a true first
step to integrate asphalt mix design and pavement
structural design in the same methodology. The
methodology is based on relating the HMA dynamic
modulus, for the three major pavement distresses of
permanent deformation, fatigue cracking and thermal
54
S t
= specimen diameter, mm
TECHNICAL PAPERS
Table 1 Aggregate Mid-Gradation for BC
Grading II and DBM II
IS Sieve Size
(mm)
Where;
BC II (Binder
Content = 5%)
DBM II (Binder
Content = 4.5%)
37.5
---
100
26.5
---
95
19
100
83
13.2
90
68
Pc
9.5
79
---
4.75
62
46
2.36
50
35
1.18
41
---
0.6
32
---
0.3
23
14
0.15
16
---
0.075
7.0
5.0
|E*| =
Pc
Pc [4,200,000 (1-VMA/100) +
3|G*|binder x {(VFA x VMA)/10,000}+
(1-Pc) x [(1-VMA/100)/4,200,000}
+ (VMA/VFA x 3|G*|) ]-1
TEST DATA
Test
Units
Aging Condition
Recommended Value
as per IS:73-2006
Result
Penetration
dm
Unaged
50-70
70.5
Softening Point
Unaged
47 (minimum)
49
Absolute Viscosity
Poise
Unaged
2400 (minimum)
2660.1
Kinematic Viscosity
cSt
Unaged
350 (minimum)
473.2
Centi Poise
Unaged
544.44
0.99 (minimum)
1.051
55
TECHNICAL PAPERS
Table 3 Result of Test Performed on BC Grading II and DBM Grading II
Binder
Content
%
BC II
Air Voids of Laboratory
Compacted Samples %
(Range)
Average
ITS (kPa)
Coeff. of
Variation
CV, %
Binder
Content
%
DBM II
Air Voids of Laboratory
Compacted Samples %
(Range)
4.3
4.5
5.97 0.27
1206.44
2.72
3.8
4.69 0.29
1078.24
2.96
5.89 0.69
11.47.09
4.19
4.0
4.26 0.15
1107.77
2.15
4.7
5.0
4.52 0.85
1162.76
2.60
4.2
3.66 0.36
897.76
1.03
4.12 0.81
1075.77
1.44
4.5
3.25 0.08
897.77
8.40
5.3
3.16 0.19
1045.00
3.99
4.8
2.40 0.06
814.91
4.56
Average
ITS (kPa)
Coeff. of
Variation,
%
BC-II
Air Void %
Dynamic Modulus
Binder Content %
DBM-II
Air Void %
(MPa)
At 45C
(MPa)
At 45C
4.5
5.0
1760
4.0
3.0
2283
4.5
5.2
1732
4.0
4.1
1965
4.7
3.4
2139
4.2
3.0
2212
4.7
3.7
2072
4.2
4.0
1952
5.0
3.6
1965
4.5
2.6
2245
5.0
4.4
1852
4.5
3.2
2080
5.3
2.1
2365
4.8
2.7
2144
5.3
2.5
2270
4.8
2.8
2120
Dynamic Modulus
TECHNICAL PAPERS
the MEPDG (whose models are different from those
used by the IRC) the number of repetitions to failure
(traffic) that is predicted by the MEPDG may not
Type/Data
Pavement type
New, Flexible
Pavement Structure
Based on IRC:37-2012; for 30 msa and subgrade CBR 10 percent; 250 mm thick Wet Mix
Macadam (WMM) base and another 200 mm of Granular Sub-Base (GSB).
Critical pavement
distresses
AC bottom-up fatigue cracking of 20 percent; Permanent deformation (AC layer only) of 10 mm;
Other distresses criteria have been taken as per default values provided in DARWin-ME. The
reliability limit has been set at 90 percent.
4 m/km
Traffic
Climate
Bitumen (%
Air Void
Measured Cumulative Number Pavement Cumulative Number Pavement
by Weight of
% (as
ITS (kPa) of Heavy Trucks to Age (Years) of Heavy Trucks to Age (Years)
Total Mix) Constructed)
Fatigue Cracking (Nf)
(Range) 10 mm Rut Depth (Nr) (Range)
4.3
5.67-6.63
1194-1251
1.91E+062.77E+06
2.00-2.83
1.04E+071.10E+07
9.08-9.50
4.5
5.42-6.69
1111-1201
1.91E+063.86E+06
3.67-3.83
9.39E+061.08E+07
9.33-9.42
4.7
4.10-7.70
1130-1199
6.69E+061.14E+07
6.25-9.75
1.04E+071.07E+07
9.17
5.0
3.17-5.10
1060-1094
7.42E+062.62E+07
10.25-18.67
9.84E+061.08E+07
8.67-9.33
5.3
2.95-3.31
1011-1031
2.73E+073.38E+07
1925-22.42
9.84E+061.01E+07
8.67-8.83
4.36-4.91
1042-1103
3.77E+065.58E+06
3.75-5.33
8.18E+068.39E+06
7.42-7.58
4.0
4.16-4.37
1090-1125
6.28E+067.42E+06
5.92-6.83
8.18E+06
7.42
4.2
3.37-4.06
887-905
9.62E+061.55E+07
8.50-12.50
7.42E+067.85E+06
6.83-7.14
4.5
3.16-3.31
832-980
2.02E+072.18E+07
15.25-16.25
7.21E+06
6.67
7.8
2.36-2.47
788-857
4.34E+074.72E+07
26.75-28.33
7.11E+06
6.58
57
TECHNICAL PAPERS
6
ANALYSIS
Eq. (1)
Eq. (2)
Where,
P b
1.
2.
3.
4.
TECHNICAL PAPERS
the dependent variable and higher the number of
simulations, better is the prediction.
The mean and standard deviation values of the
variables considered in these analyses are indicated in
Table 9. Examples of results of simulation (Number
of simulation in each case was 10,000, conducted
with MATLAB, Statistics Toolbox15) are shown in
Figs. 2 and 3 (for Nf and Nr, respectively). For brevity,
the results for BC-II mixes are shown only. First,
Property/
Performance
BC-II Indirect Tensile
Mixture Strength (ITS)
Fatigue
Equation
Condition
Rutting
Rutting
Note :
---
Mix
BC-II
DBM-II
Note :
Variable
Air Voids (AV)
Bitumen Content (Pb)
Thickness (Tk)
Air Voids (AV)
Bitumen Content (Pb)
Thickness (Tk)
Voids filled with Asphalt (VFA)
Mean
8%
5.4%
40 mm
8%
4.5%
75 mm
40%
Standard Deviation
0.5%
0.1%
3 mm
0.5%
0.1%
3 mm
2%
Where not available, standard deviations have been calculated from specified ranges
59
TECHNICAL PAPERS
Fig. 1 Indirect Strength Test (ITS) Results from BC-II (Top) and DBM-II (Bottom) Mixes at 25C; AV Air Voids
(a) Nf for Specified mean and Standard Deviations; (b) Fitted Normal Distribution: Mean = 30,722,458; Standard Deviation: 393,881
(c) Nf for BC = 4%; Mean = 30,263,359 (d) Nf for Air Voids = 12%; Mean = 30,982,811
(e) Nf for Th = 30 mm; Mean = 29,424,521 (f) Nf for Th = 50 mm; Mean = 32,010,040
Fig. 2 Examples of Results of Monte Carlo Simulation Effect of Lower than Optimum Bitumen Content and Thickness,
and Higher Air Voids on Fatigue Life, Nf
60
TECHNICAL PAPERS
(a) Nr for Specified Means and Standard Deviations; (b) Fitted Normal Distribution; Mean = 7,091,460; Standard Deviation = 126,083
(c) Nr for Bitumen Content = 4%; Mean = 7,548,096 (d) Nr for Air Voids = 12%; Mean = 6,158,046
(e) Nr for Thickness = 30 mm; Mean = 6,980,006 (f) Nr or Thickness = 50 mm; Mean = 7,199,567
Fig. 3 Examples of Results of Monte Carlo Simulation Effect of Lower than Optimum Bitumen Content and
Thickness, and Higher Air Voids on Rutting Life, Nr
61
TECHNICAL PAPERS
The decrease in Nf with a decrease in bitumen content
is clearly visible from the reduced mean values
(standard deviations have been considered to be the
same as the specified values). The effects of variations
in the means of the different parameters from the
respective specified means are also visible. However,
in many cases (as discussed in the next section), the
difference between the mean value of the distribution
of Nf or Nr that could be carried by the constructed
pavement, and the mean value of the distribution of
Nf or Nr that would have resulted if the construction
was done exactly according to specification may not
be significant, considering the variability (standard
deviation). This underlines the importance of using
appropriate standard deviations as well as confidence
limits for the development of quality control measures.
Furthermore, depending on the models, a decrease in
the same parameter can cause a decrease in fatigue
life and increase in rutting life for example, see
the effect of bitumen content (negative for fatigue
life and positive for rutting life). This has important
implication for the selection of the appropriate pay
factor, as discussed later.
6.4 Pay factors
6.4.1 Option 1: Based on Predicted Life from
Performance
Equations
(Deterministic
Approach)
The methodology of performance based pay adjustment
factors is developed, based up on the reduction/
improvement in fatigue and rutting performance.
The performance measure of the mix, and thus, of
the pavement is computed as the ratio of actual life
observed (till limiting distress) to the expected life.
PM =
Where,
PM = performance measure
62
TECHNICAL PAPERS
Table 10 Example of Influence of Various Construction Parameters on Pavement Performance for BC-II Mixture
ITS (kPa)
Air Voids
(%)
1200-1300
3.0
10.0
4.0
5.0
1150-1250
3.0
4.0
5.0
10.0
10.0
10.5
10.5
10.5
HMA Layer
Thickness (mm)
Estimated Critical
Life (Years)
132.5
7.16 (Nr)
1.432
135.0
7.18 (Nr)
1.436
137.5
7.20 (Nr)
1.440
132.5
4.17 (Nf)
0.834
135.0
4.89 (Nf)
0.978
137.5
5.60 (Nf)
1.12
132.5
Fail (Nf)
Nil
135.0
Fail (Nf)
Nil
137.5
Fail (Nf)
Nil
132.5
7.02 (Nr)
1.404
135.0
7.04 (Nr)
1.408
137.5
7.06 (Nr)
1.412
132.5
6.01 (Nf)
1.202
135.0
6.72 (Nf)
1.344
137.5
7.44 (Nf)
1.488
132.5
0.22 (Nf)
0.044
135.0
0.93 (Nf)
0.186
137.5
1.65 (Nf)
0.330
Air Voids
(%)
1050-1150
3.0
850-950
4.0
9.2
5.0
9.2
5.5
9.2
3.0
9.6
4.0
9.6
5.0
9.6
HMA Layer
Thickness (mm)
132.5
135.0
137.5
132.5
135.0
137.5
132.5
135.0
137.5
132.5
135.0
137.5
132.5
135.0
137.5
132.5
135.0
137.5
132.5
135.0
137.5
Estimated Critical
Life (Years)
8.25 (Nr)
8.27 (Nr)
8.30 (Nr)
7.25 (Nf)
7.81 (Nr)
7.83 (Nf)
1.81 (Nf)
2.46 (Nf)
3.11 (Nf)
Fail (Nf)
Fail (Nf)
0.38 (Nf)
7.65 (Nr)
7.67 (Nr)
7.70 (Nr)
4.09 (Nf)
4.74 (Nf)
5.39 (Nf)
Fail (Nf)
Fail (Nf)
Fail (Nf)
63
TECHNICAL PAPERS
While exact penalty needs to be ascertained, projectwise (considering the monitory loss incurred by the
agency due to inferior construction of the bituminous
layer rendered by the contractor, in terms of increased
expenditure caused due to earlier than scheduled
rehabilitation, increased vehicle operation cost, traffic
delays due to frequent maintenance interventions
etc), it is emphasized that even though a single
0.6-0.7
Below 0.6
Pay Factor
Re-do
No Payment
1.05
1.04
1.02
1.0
0.95
0.90
0.85
6.
PF =100*(1 PA);
1.
2.
3.
64
4.
5.
mean
)/
(30,523,084-30,300,000)/
TECHNICAL PAPERS
(Table 12) those developed on the basis of MC analyses
compare well in the bonus case but not in the penalty
case (95% versus 99%). The difference is because of
the consideration of the expected variability in the
construction materials and methods. In the case of the
deterministic (ratio of life) approach, no consideration
of the variability is considered; however, when it
is considered in the probabilistic approach, and a
confidence interval is specified, then the effect of the
lower than specified Nf becomes less harsh in terms
of penalty. One can argue that this is too lenient; the
authors do not disagree they simply intend to point
out the utility of the method, and that any discrepancy
can be resolved by adopting a good standard deviation
and an acceptable confidence limit, that are based
on reliable data. Furthermore, in this case, as the
constructed standard deviation has been considered to
be the same as the specified values- they will probably
be different in reality. The effect of that difference can
only be reflected through the probabilistic approach. It
is to be noted that not considering the variability will
be unfair for the contractor, where a penalty is likely,
and unfair for the tax paying public where a bonus is
likely.
3.
4.
5.
1.
2.
65
TECHNICAL PAPERS
in ITS values. Is this rational? If each of
the equations is studied separately, both
of them make sense a higher air voids
lowers stiffness, and a lower stiffness
means more resilience and resistance to
cracking, and hence higher Nf. So where
is the discrepancy? Perhaps there is none,
there is an optimum air voids level that
is good for fatigue life, or the models
1.
TECHNICAL PAPERS
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
3.
4.
5.
REFERENCES
1.
2.
67
Abstract
The problems encountered in the implementation of Hill road
have given rise to many disputes between the parties as well as
great difficulties in contract administration and construction
management. The substantial time and cost overruns mean that
experience has been gained at great cost.
Practically almost all the DPR drawings have been superseded
by revised drawings or new construction drawings. The standard
work specifications had not been sufficiently amended to cater to
the particular needs of hill road construction and upgrading of
existing roads. It would also appear that due to lack of adequate
site investigation details and inadequacies in the design, the Bill
of Quantities which is to be taken as the original scope of work,
was found to be inadequate.
Incorrect implementation of the design and construction practices
has given the technology a bad name and adverse opinions are
already being aired among the implementing authorities, which
needs to be corrected.
Introduction
**
*** Professor, Civil and Environmental Engineering Department, Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Worcester, MA, USA,
E-mail: rajib@wpi.edu
68
TECHNICAL PAPERS
side. High volume of surface runoff from the hill side
tends to discharge with high velocity down the slope
during the monsoon season, carrying with it substantial
amount of erodible material and causing most of the
cross drainage structures to be choked with debris.
Due to poor soil strata, slopes are inherently unstable
at many locations and are susceptible to failure during
the monsoon season.
At the initial survey stage during construction, it was
found that designed horizontal road alignment would
not fit the ground conditions at numerous locations,
primarily at settlement areas and locations passing
through steep valley. Construction in accordance
with the designed alignment would entail substantial
high embankments and very substantial amount of
retaining walls which in many cases were too costly
and technically not feasible. There were a number of
sharp curves which posed safety problem and needed
to be improved.
Similarly, designed vertical alignments with long
straights and minimum vertical curves would
conceivably result in excessive cutting and filling.
The alignment design appeared to be purely softwarebased without detailed site investigation and taking
into account the existing topographical features.
Substantial realignment has to be carried out during
construction stage to "best-fit" the existing ground
topography and to avoid construction of high retaining
wall, which is not only costly but is also technically
not feasible at many locations. Improvements to
sharp curves for safety reason have also been made
at several locations. Similarly, vertical alignments
has been modified at many stretches to "best-fit" the
existing ground levels in order to minimize formation
work. The inherent instability of high hill slopes and
demanding hill road drainage requirements had not
been addressed in the original design. In particular,
specific designs for tackling vulnerable areas had not
been provided for.
Drainage requirement in settlement areas which
invariably traversed over long flattish stretches,
were without any existing drainage and prone to
water logging during the monsoon season, and had
not been catered for. Compounding the construction
INDIAN HIGHWAYS, September 2014
a)
TECHNICAL PAPERS
of equipment is ready for delivery unless
the contractor takes advance action for
mobilization.
b)
c)
a)
b)
c)
d)
Supply
of
TECHNICAL PAPERS
terrain and restricted working space.
Transporting of stones to the crusher plant
over bad road takes up much time and
has to be suspended during the monsoon
season. Multiple handling has greatly
limited the production of aggregates.
The production of adequate aggregates
meeting specifications is deemed crucial
to the successful implementation of the
projects.
2.4
1.
2.
3.
a)
b)
c)
d)
2.5
Climatic Conditions
TECHNICAL PAPERS
in a working season. The packaging of contracts and
determination of time for completion thus have to take
into account the climatic conditions.
Monsoon rains invariably trigger landslides, causes
soil erosion and sedimentation as well as result
in valley side slope failure. Clearing of landslide
debris as well as debris from filled up drains and
catch pits, implementation of erosion control and
slope stabilization measures, and construction of
slope protection structures would increase the scope
of works and construction time. In fact, monsoon
rains were identified as one of the major causes for
premature deterioration of the completed pavement.
2.6 Land Issues
The contractors have often raised the issues of not
being given full site possession or construction land
free from encumbrances. This is found to be true to
some extent, as evidenced from the several cases of
work stoppage imposed by the landowners.
To start with, there is no land acquisition plans made
available for the road land to be clearly staked out on
the ground, although the Employer states that land
acquisition has been completed. It is learnt from the
Employer that land had been acquired on the hill side
at majority of the stretches while only a few stretches
on valley side had been taken. It is found that while
the Contractors stake out the road land in accordance
with approved cross section drawings, the boundaries
do not coincide with the extent of land acquisition at
several locations. On numerous occasions, purported
landowners step forward and stake their claims for
land compensation. There are also numerous other
cases in which purported landowners claim ownership
of valley side land where culvert outlets and slope
protection structures are to be constructed.
Land issues arise due primarily to the land acquisition
process not being carried out in accordance with the
road land requirement. Factors such as varying width
of land required for matching varying height of cut
slopes, land required for embankment construction
as well as land required for culvert outlets and slope
protection structures had not been considered. This
in part is also due to the various land reserves not
72
TECHNICAL PAPERS
2.8 External Factors
As most of the plants and equipment as well as
construction materials are sourced from outside
Mizoram, certain external factors have a direct impact
on the project implementation. Such factors include
bandhs, road blocks and strikes in other states, national
strikes by truckers and periodical shortage of diesel.
2.9
TECHNICAL PAPERS
3.3
74
a)
b)
c)
3.7
TECHNICAL PAPERS
disrupted by bandhs, hartals, road blocks etc in the
neighboring States. In order not to affect progress of
works, contractors need to have sufficient stock of key
consumables to last at least for a month. The key lesson
to be learnt here is that shortage and disruptions are
the norms rather than exceptions and will continue to
affect future major road projects, thus adding the time
for completion.
3.9
CONCLUSIONS
75
Table 1 Number of Accidents, Persons Killed & Injured as per Road Classification during the Year 2012
Road Classification
No. of Accidents
No. of Person Killed
No of Person Injured
National Highways
1,42,694
48,768
1,53,502
State Highways
1,18,835
37,711
1,32,170
Total
4,90,383
1,38,258
5,09,667
4,99,628
1,34,513
5,27,512
2011
4,97,686
1,42,485
5,11,394
2012
4,90,383
1,38,258
5,09,667
**
76
Other Roads
2,28,854
51,779
2,23,995
TECHNICAL PAPERS
2
Table 3 Share in Percentage of Different Vehicles Primarily Responsible for Road Accidents,
Fatal Accidents, Persons Killed and Person Injured During the Year 2012
Parameters
Accidents
Fatal
Accidents
TwoAutoWheelers Rickshaws
25.1
21.1
6.8
4.2
Cars,
Jeeps &
Taxis
21.6
18.3
Buses
8.8
9.1
Other Motor
Vehicles #
8.7
10.2
Persons
20.3
4.2
18.6
9.7
28.8
9.8
Killed
Persons
23.1
7.6
21.9
11.4
21.9
8.2
Injured
* Others vehicles/objects: include pedestrians, bicycles and manually drawn vehicles/objects.
# Other Motor Vehicles: include Auto rickshaws, other motor vehicles and manually drawn vehicles/objects.
*Other
Vehicles/
Objects
6.3
Total
100.0
100.0
8.5
8.6
100.0
5.9
100.0
and the need for effective policies for curbing road accidents
make it imperative to study the causes of road accidents.
Causes of road accidents during the year 2012 are given in
Table 4.
Table 4 Causes of Road Accidents during 2012
Causes of Accidents
No. Injured
No. Killed
Accidents
3,98,965
1,01,211
3,85,934
Fault of Cyclist
5,192
2,449
5,864
Fault of Pedestrians
10,441
4,737
12,185
Drivers Fault
8,227
2,739
7,037
74,32
2,346
6,796
Weather Condition
5,621
1,900
4,530
73,789
22,876
68,037
5,09,667
1,38,258
4,90,383
TOTAL
##
77
TECHNICAL PAPERS
There is a need to impart training to drivers, educating them
about the dangers of driving at very light speed and to have
Table 5 Other Causes of Accidents which were Reported in the Year 2012
S. No.
Causes
1.
Intake of Alcohol/Drugs
Exceeding Lawful Speed
Accidents due to Over Speeding/Over
Crowding
Accidents Load Protruding
No. of Accidents
23,979
2,23,902
99,854
28,217
3,75,952
9,087
1,08,194
2,950
3,77,702
78
Remarks
(Cricket Player)
(Lorry Driver)
TECHNICAL PAPERS
black spots on NHs in other States examined to finalize
engineering measures for improvement Similar initiative is
required by the State Governments for State Highways and
Major District Roads. It is unfair to accord low priority to
remedial engineering measures at accident black spots. In
countries such as UK and Japan, Engineer in charge working
at different levels are given targets to reduce accidents in
their area of jurisdiction. Engineers after study at accident
sites suggest and implement engineering measures and
achieve reduction in accidents.
7
79
80
81
82
Circular and Annexure-1 is available on Ministerys Website (www.morth.nic.in) and same is also available in Ministerys Library.
83
84
Circular and Annexure is available on Ministerys Website (www.morth.nic.in) and same is also available in Ministerys Library.
85
86
87