Digitally signed by

Joseph H Zernik

Dr Z DN: cn=Joseph H
Zernik, o, ou,
email=jz12345@earthli

Joseph H Zernik, DMD, PhD nk.net, c=US

Location: La Verne,
California
PO Box 526, La Verne, CA 91750; Fax: 801.998.0917; E-Mail: jz12345@earthlink.net Date: 2010.01.24
06:49:56 -08'00'

08-03-13 Countrywide’s purported Order to Show Cause in re: Contempt, Sanctions.

The order should be deemed upon review as fraud and extortion by Countrywide, Bryan
Cave, LLP, and Judge Terry Friedman, on numerous accounts, including, but not limited to
the following:

1) The evidence demonstrated that the caption of Samaan v Zernik was never a true
caption of the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles.
2) Judge Terry Friedman was never issued the duly required by law Assignment Order.
He just claimed possession of the case file.
3) Bryan Cave, LLP, was never authorized as counsel of record in Samaan v Zernik
either. It appeared in court even at times when the General Counsel of Bank of
America Corporation, after July 1, 2008, explicitly stated that they were NOT
authorized to appear.
4) Instant Order to Show Cause, regarding serious sanctions of $16,170 and quasi
criminal charges of contempt, was purportedly verified by Judge Terry Friedman on
March 13, 2008, and served on March 13, 2008 as well, ordering the show cause on
March 7, 2008.
Such discrepancies in date are not naïve errors at all. They were considered the
“Finger Prints” of the LA-JR (alleged LA Judiciary Racket), and were routinely found
in cases and orders that were void and fraudulent on their faces. Regardless, as
was the case in here. Bryan Cave, LLP,, proceeded to collect the funds from
Attorney David Pasternak. However, today, both Bryan Cave, LLP, and Bank of
America Corporation refuse to answer on whose behalf such monetary transaction
was executed.

It should be noted that the undersigned never appeared in court on that day or afterwards.
However, in the noted case of Attorney Richard Fine, he has been kept falsely hospitalized for
almost a year by now, following such fraudulent hearing on contempt, ending with a fraudulent
order and judgment, bearing mismatched dates, as seen here.

Dated: January 24, 2010 in La Verne, Los Angeles County, California.

By: _______________

Joseph Zernik
 F~J5:CI:.lrVED

2
/1AR 1 22008
. 3 CONFORMED COpy
SUPERIOR COURT
OF ORIGINAL FILED
WEST D/STHICT
Los Angeles Superior Court
4 SANTA MOflllCA

5 MAr< 1 ~ 2008

JOhn A. Clarke, Executive Officer/Clerk

6
By J. Citron, Deputy
7

8 $UPERIOR COURT 01' THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

9 FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, WEST DISTRICT
10
11 II NIVIE SAMAAN, et a1., Case No. SC087400

<0
Plaintiffs,
co
C")
12
~
0'­

00

C")'<t 13 vs. E~IEt.fJO~Et) ORDER

Q..a>0
.-J~())
-l Cf)=> .~
a> E 14
~ ~g
()~(ij
c'O()
IS II JOSEPH ZERNIK, et a1.
ro ro _
>.oro
L. ~ 0
III III 'c Defendants. Date: February 15,2008
00
~~
16 Tirrle: 8:45 a.m.
ro
C Dept: WEJ
ro
Cf)
17

18

19

20

21 Countrywide Home Loans, Inc.'s (Countrywide") motion (1) to enforce the July 23,

22 2007 protective order against Defendant Joseph Zemik ("Zernik"); (2) for monetary sanctions

23 against Zernik it;l the amount of$16,170; (3) for a declaration that Countrywide has no

24 obligation to respond further to Zernik's harassing communications; and (4) for an order to

25 show cause why Zernik should not be held in contempt and sanctioned accordingly (the

26 "Motion") cam~ on for hearing before the Hono:~able Terry B. Friedman in Department WEJ

27 of the Los Angeles Superior Court, West District, on February 15,2008. John W. Amberg of
28

SMOI DOCS672389. I PROPOSED ORDER

 1 I Bryan Cave LLP appeared on behalf on non-party and movant Countrywide. Defendant

2 II Joseph Zernik appeared on his own behalf. Also in attendance were Receiver David J.

3 ~ Pasternak and Moe Keshavarzi of Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP, counsel for
4 \I Plaintiff Nivie 5amaan.

5 I Having read and considered the Motion and all papers submitted in support thereof

6 I and in opposition thereto, and having heard and considered the argument of counsel and

7 I Defendant] oseph Zernik, and good cause appearing therefor,

8 \I THE COURT FINDS THAT:

9 I 1. The Protective Order issued by the Honorable Jacqueline Connor on] uly 23, 2007 (the

10 II "Protective Order") is a valid order and the Court was authorized to grant the

11 II Protective Order pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure Sections 2031.060

<D
co 12 II and pur~uant to California Code of Civil Procedure Section 128(a)(5). Both code
(')
~
o~
00
(')'<1" 13 II sections serve as legitimate bases for the issuance of the Protective Order;
Q.Q)g
.....J:!::'
-J :;).~
C1) en E 14 II 2. The Pro;tective Order is affIrmed and remains in full force and effect; and
~ ~g
O~(ij
cuO
rn rn _ 15 I 3. Countrywide presented sufficient evidence that Defendant]oseph Zernik violated the
~erJ
co m· c
00
~:2
16 II Protective Order and should be sanctioned.
rn
1:
rn
(j)
17 I IT IS SPECIFICALLY ORDERED TI-:1AT:

18 I 1. Defendant] oseph Zernik is to pay CountryMde (through Countrywide's attorneys of

19 I record) the amount of $16,170 as sanctions within 20 days of the hearing. In the event

20 II that Zernik fails to pay these sanctions to Countrywide, the Receiver in this matter,

21 II David]. Pasternak, is authorized to pay the sanctions to Countrywide from the

22 I Receiver's Fund upon notice to the Receiver and Defendant] oseph Zernik by

23 I Countrywide; and

24 11/ / /

25 11///
26 11///
27 11///
28 11///
SMOIDOCS672389.J 2

PROPOSED ORDER
 1 II 2. Defendant Joseph Zernik is ordered to appear on Match 7, 2008 at 9:30 a.m. to show

2 II cause why he should not be held in contempt of court and sanctioned for violating the

3 I Protecti~e Order.

1-1·

511 IT IS SO ORDERED.
6

'7 II Dated: 311~/O~ Viute;, :j~

Hon. Terry B. Friedman
8
Judge, Superior Court of California

911 Prepared and submitted by:

10 BRYAN CAVELLP I
11 I John W. Ambe:rg (CA State Bar No. 108.166)
Jenna Moldawsky (CA State Bar No. 24()109)
<0 12 120 Broadway, Suite 300
~ . Santa Monica, ~alifornia 90401-2386
g c; n Telephone: (310) 576-2100
Il- :;
..J:t:::::
g - Facsimile: Q310) 576-2200
a: ~.~
> >.
14
8
0

~~ 15 II Attorneys for (j:ountrywide Home Loans, Inc.

CIl ro .
>.OCll
coL" co .-
~ 0

o g 16
~~
ro
~
en 17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

2S
26

27

28
SMOI DOCS672389.I 3
PROPOSED ORDER
 1 PROOF OF SERVICE

2 I am employed in the County of Los Angeles, State of California. I am over the age of 18 and
not a party to tlie within action. My busine:;s address is 120 Broadway, Suite 300, Santa Monica,
3 California 90401-2305.
4
On Marj=h 13,2008, I served the foregoing doc:urnent(s), described as ORDER, on the
interested party(s) in tlus action, as follows:
5

6 Moe Keshavarzi, Esq. Joseph Zernik

Sheppard MuuJ Richter & Hampton, UP 2415 Saint George Street
7 333 South HOPr Street, 48tb Floor Los Feliz, California 90027
Los Angeles, C4 90071-1448 Telephone: (310) 435-9107
8 Facsimile: 213-920-1398 Facsimile: (801) 998-0917
9 !nkeshavarzi(O),sheppardmullin.com izJ 2345@earthlink.net
10 Robert J. Shulkin, Esq.
David T. Pasternak Legal Department
11 - I
Pasternak, Pasternak &. Patton, LLP Coldwell Banker Residential Brokerage Company
I

to ] 875 Century Park East, Suite 2200 11611 San Vicente Boulevard, 9 th floor
co 12
(")
'i'
Los Angeles, Cllifornia 90067-2523 Los Angeles, CA 90049
o~
00
(")'<1" 13 Telephone: 310+553-1500 Facsimile: 310-447-1902
0..(1)0
.-.J~(J) Facsimile: 310-553-1540 robert.shulkin@cam_oves.coln
- ' (/)
(1)
OJ --'"
E ]4- flip.@pa $13w. corh
:>.
o :;: '"
>
rn ~
0

c-oU
'" Cll _
]5
\,:,OCll
~ 0
III [lJ--
0O
c
16 C2J (BY OVERNITE EXPRESS) I deposited in a box or other facility maintained by
~~
~
Ovenute Expreks, an express carrier service, or delivered to a courier or driver authorized by said
c
Cll
(/)
17 express carrier slervice to receive documents, a true copy (or original) of the foregoing document, in
an envelope designated by said express service carrier, with delivery fees paid or provided for.
18
Executed on March13, 2008, at Santa Monica, California.
19
I decIa17e under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America
20 and the State ~f California that the foregoing is true and correct.
21
/---....

r FL~
22
23
~
nk Ka~----! ----- ----

24- L ..---Y
25
26
27
28

SMOI DOCS672389I PROPOSED ORDER