Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
com/thread/84286
Farhan Javed
Active Contributor
Hi everyone,
We have a 2000 KVA Dyn-11 Transformer at our site and it is earther from two earth pits one for
neutral and for body. We have recently observed that there is a leakage of 24 A from transformer
body. I just want to know whether it is normal or not?
Moreover, could it have any effect on Electronic Protection Relay installed on the upstream of
transformer (HT Panel) as we are often finding our Main VCB of HT panel tripped showing IE>>
during transformer excitation (start-up). We are using Siemens' 7SJ602 protection relay. Any
suggestion/comment would be appreciated.
Regards
Farhan Javed
#1 "Re: 2000 KVA Transformer - Body Leakage of 24 A" by Tornado on 04/10/2013 2:45 AM (score 2)
#2 "Re: 2000 KVA Transformer - Body Leakage of 24 A" by PWSlack on 04/10/2013 3:38 AM (score 3)
#8 "Re: 2000 KVA Transformer - Body Leakage of 24 A" by leveles on 04/10/2013 11:38 PM (score 3)
#20 "Re: 2000 KVA Transformer - Body Leakage of 24 A" by eugene344 on 04/12/2013 2:14 AM (score 2)
Check out these comments that don't yet have enough votes to be "official" good answers and, if you agree with them, rate them!
#7 "Re: 2000 KVA Transformer - Body Leakage of 24 A" by eugene344 on 04/10/2013 10:39 PM (score 1)
Tornado
#1
Guru
The phase-to-ground voltage is probably at least 220 for this transformer. If so, 24A x 220V
5.3KW (and maybe more). That's a lot of energy leakage, and certainly not normal. If you are
lucky, it may be something as simple as a loose wire strand, or insulation damage somewhere. In
any event, prompt investigation and correction are essential. Good luck in tracking this down
quickly and safely.
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Ketchikan, AK,
USA
Posts: 16134
Good Answers: 644
__________________
In vino veritas; in cervisia carmen; in aqua E. coli.
Register to ReplyGood Answer (Score 2)
Go to Next Good Answer
PWSlack
#2
Guru
Look for connections and crosses between the neutral conductor and the ground/earth conductor
at alldistribution boxes downstream, and eliminate them. This is an important safety issue, so do it
before someone disconnects one of those conductors thinking all is well, and gets an armful of volts
for the trouble. Do it today/now/immediately/without delay either.
__________________
"Did you get my e-mail?" - "The biggest problem in communication is the illusion that it has taken
place" - George Bernard Shaw, 1856
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: In the bothy, 7
chains down the line
from Dodman's Lane
level crossing, in the
JCase
#15
In reply to #2
Power-User
To answer the OP question (again). NO! It is not at all normal! Get working to fix it right now!
Follow PW's guidance, as it is good.
Location: USA
Posts: 197
Register to Reply
Good Answers: 7
sainath sastry
#3
Member
04/10/2013 9:28 AM
certainly it is more current. make independent neutral earthing with 50X6 mm GI flat, at the
same time with Body also. transformer earthing should not connect with grid earthing, check
tap operations, may be relay triping on instantaneous current. check settings, commonly
megger values, you may found something if you open inspection top cover...like opened
winding, etc, carbonised oil.
Register to Reply
electricalexpert65
#4
Guru
04/10/2013 9:29 AM
24A earth leakage current is very dangerous. Indicates some insulation deterioration. Pl.
investigate & rectify immediately.
Register to Reply
North of 60
#5
Guru
Are you saying that the grounding conductor that connects the metal tank/case of this
transformer to your earth pit sees a current flow of 24 amps? If so, have you tried to
measure the voltage across the circuit between the tank and the earth pit?
Join Date: Mar 2007
What happens to this current flow when you unload the transformer? Open its downstream
__________________
Joe Contractor to Electrical Inspector, "What do you mean you are going to make me follow
the code?".
Good Answers: 89
Register to Reply
cuba_pete
#6
Guru
Good Answers: 40
Register to Reply
eugene344
#7
Active Contributor
04/10/2013 10:39 PM
1. PWSLACK has given some guidance on the 24A leakage current. However if the current persists
when the LV side is disconnected, you may have a HV fault and this needs to be resolved quickly.
With the transformer isolated from supply (HV and LV) check insulation resistance HV to Tank, LV
to Tank and HV to LV. Check the arrangement of the HV system neutral earthing.
2. The tripping on energising is possibly due to inrush current. ((I>> is usually instantaneous and
thus will operate if the inrush is greater than the setting) This can be up to 6 times full load
current, and may not be balanced. Review the protection settings to ensure that instantaneous
(I>>) settings take account of inrush current.
Register to ReplyScore 1 for Good Answer
No more "Almost" Good Answers.
leveles
#8
Guru
04/10/2013 11:38 PM
IQ
#9
Guru
04/11/2013 2:55 AM
Is it from the transformer or from your MV cables, (earth leakage and cirrcualting earth
faults)? Did you disconnect the cables and measure the amps?
Also, it is time people defined their voltage ratrher than telling us HT. 11, 22, 33, 66kV, is
NOT HT. If you place the correct information here, people can assist you better. i.e voltage,
cable type, etc. Cheers.
Register to ReplyScore 1 for Off Topic
electricalexpert65
#10
In reply to #9
Guru
I am surprised! What are you talking? If 11, 22, 33, 66kV are NOT HT, then what are they?
Are they LT?
Reference is drawn to IEC 60038, wherein it is mentioned that LV is less than 1kV, HV Range
'A' is above 1kV but less than or equal to 245kV and HV Range 'B' is above 245kV.
And, just in case you don't know, LV is Low Voltage & HV is High Voltage.
tcmtech
#11
In reply to #10
Guru
__________________
"I'm not really and optimist. It just an unpleasant side effect of my medication"
tcmtech.
HiTekRedNek
#12
In reply to #10
Guru
Posts: 2234
The NEC defines it as any voltage above 600 volts AC,and British Standard has
__________________
"I no longer need to run as a presidential candiadate for the socialist party.The
Democratic party has adopted our platform."Norman Thomas,1944
Register to ReplyScore 1 for Off Topic
IQ
#13
In reply to #10
Guru
Good Answers: 12
Rather than show ignorance here, IEC 60038 is for Standard Voltages. It does not state
what is MV, HV or EHV. So dipstick, for your education it works as such.
1kv to 132kV Distribution voltage. which covers MV and HV. 11kV is MV, 132kV - 400kV is
HV, 500kV and above is EHV and super EHV. 1MV is operational in China. Know you
voltages.
Electronic Protection Relay installed on the upstream of transformer (HT Panel) As
quoted, HT panel?Rather state a voltage then folks know and can help.
God help you on a transmission line or sub station. But to answer the lads concern,
it could be coming from the Tfx or more likely the cable and if this was oil filled cables,
there is an earth issue on a cable. If this is XLPE cable it can be the termination, the cable
screen, the cable core holed and the semi con leaking into the screen. It could even be a
joint breaking down, if there is a joint in the cable. The far side earth protection should
have tripped, if the cable is faulted to that side. If it is closer to the near side breaker the
fault will not be seen by the relays. And this depends on earthing of the cables. So in your
jest, you should perhaps keep quite as there are people who don't waste time with 17th
edition as it has no value in 132kV systems. Wipe the shit from your eyes and learn for a
change. And I guarantee this is a MV cable fault and very close the to the termination. It
just makes it easier when one knows a voltage, rather than assumed terminology. But
then if this is NOT your field, then tolerating fools and horses is hard work for us F'wits.
Read Note 3, page 10, IEC 60038 Ed 6.2, 2002-07.
Register to Reply
electricalexpert65
#17
In reply to #13
Guru
Voltage levels have been defined and classified by various National and
International Standards as also by certain electric power utility companies. The
following are the definitions given in various Indian & International Standards
for AC Voltages.
******
India: As per the Indian Electricity Rules, 1956, vide Rule 2(av), the following
are the limits:
Low Voltage: Not exceeding 250V
Medium Voltage: Not exceeding 650V
High Voltage: Not exceeding 33000V
Extra High Voltage: Exceeding 33000V
******
But, in IS 13234 - 1992, which is the "Guide for short-circuit current calculation
in Three-phase A.C. Systems" - it is mentioned vide Table I that:
Low Voltage: 100V to 1000V
Medium Voltage: > 1kV to 35kV
High Voltage: > 35kV to 230kV
As can be seen from the above, there is no harmony between the IS and the IE
Rules in this issue.
******
France: Vide a publication dated 14th November 1998, the French Regulations
define three voltage levels as below:
Low Voltage: < 1kV
High Voltage A (HTA): > 1kV but </= 50kV
High Voltage B (HTB): > 50kV
******
CENELEC (The European Electrotechnical Standardisation Committee): Vide a
publication dated 27th July 1992, the CENELEC recognises the following voltage
levels:
Low Voltage: < 1kV
Medium Voltage: > 1kV but </= 35kV
High Voltage: > 35kV
******
IEC (International Electrotechnical Commission): In IEC 60071, the following
Farhan Javed
#14
Active Contributor
04/11/2013 7:35 AM
First of all Trandformer incoming voltage is 11 KV we conducted all the test of transformer like HV
to LV Meggar, HV Meggar, LV Meggar, Cable Meggar, TTR, horn conditions and everything is fine.
We observed that the leakage is from our downstream network and is being observed at
transfromer body as both LT and Transofrmer share a common earth.
We removed entire plant load and then tried to reset the VCB but it tripped again!!
Transformer vendor has suggested that our protection CTs "5P20" might be entering into saturation
region and since we have set 0.0 sec delay on IE>> fault, VCB is being tripped instantly...
Interestingly after performing all transformer tests when we reset the VCB it did not tripped and
since yesterday it is working fine!!!
Regards,
Farhan Javed
Register to Reply
PWSlack
#16
In reply to #14
Guru
__________________
"Did you get my e-mail?" - "The biggest problem in communication is the illusion that it has taken
place" - George Bernard Shaw, 1856
Register to Reply
on.
Posts: 22999
juan J.
Isdray
#19
In reply to #14
Commentator
04/11/2013 4:15 PM
Posts: 70
Ok Farhan, everyone here has express their best opinion but far away from site, now take your
notebook and choice the better of each one because you are touching the problem.
Reference to the voltage designation, please check standard ANSI-84 1 -2006 despite voltage
designation now is not your top priority.
Good luck
Bye
Register to Reply
eugene344
#20
In reply to #14
Active Contributor
Good Answers: 4
If LV and HT earths are common, and there is no problem on HV side, the current is probably LV
neutral current which is finding parallel paths through neutral to earth connections. Check if the
LV neutral is connected to earth at the transformer and another place.
As for the HV VCB tripping. What is the CT ratio? Since the transformer is 2000kVA (primary
current 104amps), the CT primary is at least 100A. 5p20 will take 2000A before saturating. This
is not likely to be the reason for the VCB tripping on Ie>>.
Inrush current could be as high as 600A. However this level of current will not always happen as
it depends on the point in the cycle that the closing occurs. Sometimes the VCB will not trip, and
other times it will.
What is the current setting for the Ie>> function? You could put a short time delay (e.g. 0.2
seconds) or increase the current setting if it is too low. The Ie> function with appropriate time
setting should pick up low level earth faults
Register to ReplyGood Answer (Score 2)
No more Good Answers. Go to first "Almost" Good Answer
leveles
#18
Guru
04/11/2013 12:10 PM
comes back with Meggering parts. By the way, it is Megger, not meggar. Who cares?
A relay trips for a reason, that is for sure. That is not sure at all, what the reason is. The relay not
tripping for a day for unknown reasons is not an achievement in my book.
Actual measurements, anyone. As in verifying, if the 24Amps is real in the first place, and its
nature, if it exist at all?!?
Register to Reply
nightshade
#21
In reply to #18
Associate
08/11/2014 8:54 AM
Hi,
Leveles thank you for pointing out the tests. I have taken over maintenance of this particular
transformer after my predeccesor Farhan. I conducted the tests. Below are the results;
1) Unloaded LT, leakage current on earth : 16A
2) Unloaded LT, voltage on transformer body to earth busbar : 0V
3) Unloaded LT, voltage on neutral to earth : 0V
4) Unloaded LT, leakage current frequency : 150 Hz
5) Unloaded LT, leakage current THD : 250%
6) Unloaded LT, power quadrant 1, net power 0W, PF 1.00, tan 0.00
With LT on load the above values remain same except the frequency changes to 50Hz (our system
freq).
We do not have an oscilloscope on site, the THD values were noted from a power analyser we use
(PEL 100). An interesting observation here is that while the transformer neutral is earthed
seperately, the transformer body earth is common with the plant distribution ( body earth
connection made to a bus bar where multiple equipment and feeders have been earthed including a
generator neutral connection). I do not believe that the leakage is resulting from damage to
transformer or some neutral to phase cross over. I do not believe the current is ohmic (though the
1.0 PF seemed disturbing). What are your thoughts?
Register to Reply
HiTekRedNek
#22
In reply to #21
Guru
Posts: 2234
Good Answers: 100
nightshade
#23
In reply to #22
Associate
HiTekRedNek
#24
In reply to #23
Guru
08/12/2014 1:08 AM
Link:http://www.hammondpowersolutions.com/files/HPS_article_Harmonics_Phas
eShifting.pdf
__________________
"I no longer need to run as a presidential candiadate for the socialist party.The
Democratic party has adopted our platform."Norman Thomas,1944
Register to Reply
Register to Reply
24 comments
Back to top
Interested in this topic? By joining CR4 you can "subscribe" to
this discussion and receive notification when new comments are added.
Join CR4, The Engineer's Place for News and Discussion!
#1 "Re: 2000 KVA Transformer - Body Leakage of 24 A" by Tornado on 04/10/2013 2:45 AM (score 2)
#2 "Re: 2000 KVA Transformer - Body Leakage of 24 A" by PWSlack on 04/10/2013 3:38 AM (score 3)
#8 "Re: 2000 KVA Transformer - Body Leakage of 24 A" by leveles on 04/10/2013 11:38 PM (score 3)
#20 "Re: 2000 KVA Transformer - Body Leakage of 24 A" by eugene344 on 04/12/2013 2:14 AM (score 2)
Check out these comments that don't yet have enough votes to be "official" good answers and, if you agree with them, rate them!
#7 "Re: 2000 KVA Transformer - Body Leakage of 24 A" by eugene344 on 04/10/2013 10:39 PM (score 1)
Copy to Clipboard