Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Technology
(5EJ507)
Module Handbook
2014 - 2015
(Semester 2 delivery)
Coll
ege
of
Engi
neer
ing
and
Tech
nolo
gy
Module Leader:
Barry Mills
b.mills@derby.ac.uk
MS103
01332 593193
Topic
Chapter/page
Frenzels book
CHP1/2
CHP 11
CHP 11/12
CHP 3/4/5/6
CHP 8/9
CHP7
CHP 10
CHP 16/17
CHP 18/19
ALL
ALL
ALL
READING LIST
PRINCIPLES OF ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS l. FRENZEL
3RD EDITION McGRAW HILL
ISBN 978-0-07-110607-8
****
COMMUNICATION ENGINEERING PRINCIPLES
PALGRAVE
ISBN 0-333-77522-8
I.OTUNG
G SMILLIE
(E_BOOK)
D C GREEN
Module Title
Module Code
5EJ507
Date of Approval
March 2012
Module Level
Credit value
20
Total Number of
Learning Hours
200
Key Words
Module Delivery
Mode
Online/Distance
Pre-requisite
Blended/Face to
face
None
Work-based
learning
Module
Description
Module Learning
Outcomes
Module Content
Module
Assessment
Method
Reading list
60% weighting:
Learning Outcome 1
This coursework will assess your appreciation and
understanding of analogue modulation and
demodulation techniques, through practical activities
and relate this critically to theoretical concepts
acquired through background reading.
EX:
40% weighting:
Learning Outcome 2
The two-hour examination will be designed to
assess your knowledge and ability to analyse
analogue and digital communication systems.
http://liblists.derby.ac.uk/lists/B68604B6-FB65-4C50-7654B5F7B311C022.html
REGULATIONS
The module conforms fully to the relevant UG regulatory framework.
Regulations for academic year 2014/2015 can be found at
http://www.derby.ac.uk/qed/3Rs/
Electronic Communication
Technology
(5EJ507)
Co
lle
ge
of
En
gi
ne
eri
ng
an
d
Te
ch
no
lo
gy
Assignment 1
Portfolio of Communication Techniques.
Programme(s):
Assessment Number:
Assessment Weighting:
60% of module
1 and 2
Week Set:
Submission Date:
Assignment Brief
Part A Analogue communication
1. Write a brief explanation of the principles of the super-heterodyne
receiver. It may help to use a simple block diagram to express the
process. Explain the purpose of the Intermediate Frequency amplifiers
and explain how they process and shape the received signal.
[500 words]
(15%)
2. Write a brief summary of how noise can affect an AM/FM Superhet
receiver. What are the differences in how the two demodulator stages
work and discuss how the automatic gain and automatic frequency
control voltages are produced and used?
[500 words]
(15%)
3. Discuss using diagrams where appropriate how analogue signals are
converted to digital signals. Discuss the need for non-uniform
quantisation and the process of conversion back to an analogue signal.
[500 words]
(20%)
b. Delta Modulation
Correct referencing should be used and a detailed bibliography provided. This may
include web addresses, as well as any books and journals used etc.
% mark
Mark Descriptors
Class
This scale applies to Levels 3, 4, 5 and 6 in the University Credit Framework. The
descriptors are typical characteristics of the standard of work associated with each
range of marks. The descriptors are illustrative and for guidance only. They are not
comprehensive. A mark of 40% is regarded as a minimum pass. See Section B3.2 for
level descriptors.
Very good
60-69%
A very good standard; a very good level of critical analysis and evaluation;
significant originality; well researched; a very good standard of presentation;
pleasing clarity of ideas; thoughtful and effective presentation; very good
sense of coherence and logic; minor errors only.
Good
50-59%
A good standard; a fairly good level of critical analysis and evaluation; some
evidence of original thinking or originality; quite well researched; a good
standard of presentation; ideas generally clear and coherent, some evidence
of misunderstandings; some deficiencies in presentation.
Second
Div 1
Outstanding; high to very high standard; a high level of critical analysis and
evaluation, incisive original thinking; commendable originality; exceptionally
well researched; high quality presentation; exceptional clarity of ideas;
excellent coherence and logic. Trivial or very minor errors.
Second
Div 2
70-100%
First
Excellent
Unsatisfactory
35-39%
Marginal
Fail
A sound standard of work; a fair level of critical analysis and evaluation; little
evidence of original thinking or originality; adequately researched; a sound
standard of presentation; ideas fairly clear and coherent, some significant
misunderstandings and errors; some weakness in style or presentation but
satisfactory overall.
Third
Satisfactory
40-49%
Well below the pass standard; a poor critical analysis and evaluation; no
evidence of originality; poorly researched; standard of presentation totally
unacceptable;
ideas
confused
and
incoherent,
some
serious
misunderstandings and errors. A clear fail well short of the pass standard. At
the bottom of the range the work demonstrates nothing of merit.
Non-submission
NS
Fail
Very poor
1-34%
IMPORTANT: An assignment may show the characteristics of two or more marks. The examiner
should give careful consideration to the relative importance of the applicable descriptors as
indicated by the assessment criteria in deciding the overall standard of the work and the
appropriate mark to be awarded
http://www.derby.ac.uk/files/general_health_and_safety_regulations.doc
This is the document that you were informed about during your enrolment and asked
to submit a signed declaration stating that you understand the health and safety
issues to which it refers. If you are unable to view the document or you have not
signed and submitted the declaration then you should contact your Course Leader
immediately.
In the UK, the Health and Safety Executive enforces the law in many workplaces
including universities. It issues advice and guidance on their website:
http://www.hse.gov.uk/
For an overview of the role of the Health and Safety Executive, refer to the document
entitled A guide to health and safety regulation in Great Britain which should be
available on their website:
http://www.hse.gov.uk/pubns/web42.pdf
The health and safety issues of scheduled and prescribed laboratory activities for this
module are described on the following Record of Risk Assessment form. You should
read this before attempting any laboratory activity for this module.
Assessment Reference
Activity assessed
Students, Academic Staff, Technician Staff, Short Course Participants, Open Day and
other Visitors, Cleaning Staff.
Machinery
13
Electricity
19
Substances
Tools/Equipment
14
Noise or Vibration
20
High
Pressure
Tripping/Slipping
Mobile work
equipment
15
21
Fire/
explosion
Manual handling
operations
10
Mechanical lifting
equipment
16
Workstation
22
Fall of person
Fall of objects
3
4
5
Repetitive work
Housekeeping /
waste material
11
Display screen
equipment
12
Sharp objects
25
Drowning
26
Psychological
effects
27
Human error
Lighting
28
Violence
layout / space
17
Radiation
23
Confined
space
29
Peripatetic /
lone working
18
Temperature /
weather
24
Buildings &
glazing
30
Other(s)
Hazard
No.
Description
S = Severity, L = Likelihood
Residual Risk
Tolerable risk
Trip on obstructions
Good housekeeping.
Tolerable risk
10
Tolerable risk
Trivial risk
Machinery
Tolerable risk
Tolerable
risk
11
Tolerable risk
14
Noise or Vibration
Trivial risk
19
Substances:
Tolerable risk
Tolerable risk
All
Assessor(s)
David Wilson
Date of Assessment
21 Sept 10
Signed
Revision No.
11
2 - First Aid
4 - Highly likely
Tolerable
Risk
3 - Probable
Tolerable
Risk
Tolerable
Moderate
Risk
Risk
Tolerable
Risk
Tolerable
Risk
Trivial
Risk
Trivial
Risk
2 - Possible
1 - Improbable
Moderate
Risk
Substantial
Risk
Substantial
Risk
4 - Fatality
Intolerable
Risk
Substantial
Risk
Tolerable
Moderate
Risk
Risk
Moderate
Risk
Tolerable
Risk
Tolerable
Risk
Intolerable
Risk
Substantial
Risk
Significantly high risk that where reasonably practical activity should be suspended
until significant action has been taken to reduce the risk. Where this is not reasonably
practicable, strict deadlines should be agreed for further action to reduce the risk.
Moderate
Risk
Tolerable
Risk
Trivial
Risk
12