Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
PROJECT REPORT ON
INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS
MASTERS OF COMMERCE
(MANAGEMENT)
SEMESTER 1
2014-15
SUBMITTED BY
Miss. IQRA ANSARI
ROLL NO: 8
PROJECT GUIDE
Mrs. SEEMA SAWANT
M.Com (Management)
1st SEMESTER
INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS
SUBMITTED BY
Miss. IQRA ANSARI
ROLL NO: 8
CERTIFICATE
This is to certify that Ms. Iqra Ansari of M.Com Management Semester- 1
[2014-2015] has successfully completed the Project on INDUSTRIAL
RELATION under the guidance of Ms. Seema Sawant .
Project Guide
________________
Course Coordinator
________________
Internal Examiner
________________
External Examiner
________________
Principal
________________
Date: ______
Place: Mumbai.
DECLARATION
I, Ms. IQRA ANSARI student of M.Com Management, Semester- 1 (20142015), hereby declare that I have completed the project on INDUSTRIAL
RELATION
IQRA ANSARI
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
I owe my special thanks to the Principle Dr. Chitra Natrajan and the Cocoordinator of M.com Dr. (Ms) Minu Madlani for giving me an opportunity for
this project work. I would like to give my thanks to the Project Guide Ms.
Seema Sawant for her guidance and kind assessment that she has provided me
and the inspiration in valued guidance and ideas throughout the project. I am
also thankful to the library staff of K. P. B. Hinduja College of Commerce who
co-operated with me and even all those seen and unseen hands and heads which
helped me in completion of this project.
INDEX
CHAPTER NO
TOPICS
TITLE PAGE
CERTIFICATE
DECLARATION
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
1.1
INTRODUCTION
1.2
1.3
METHODS OF RESEARCH
1.4
1.5
LIMITATIONS
1.6
CHAPTERS SCHEMES
INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS
TRADE UNIONISM
3
4
4.1
4.2
5.1
5.2
6.1
6.2
INDUSTRIAL DISPUTES
GRIEVANCES HANDLING
WORKERS PARTICIPATION IN MANAGEMENT
COLLECTIVE BARGAINING
EMPLOYEE COMMUNICATION
WORKERS EDUCATION AND TRAINING
CONCLUSION
BIBLIOGRAPHY
PAGE
NO
CHAPTER 1
1.1 Introduction
Industrial relations have its roots in the industrial revolution which created the modern
employment relationship by generating free labour markets and large-scale industrial
organizations with thousands of wage workers. As society fought with these massive
economic and social changes, labor problems arose. Low wages, long working hours,
monotonous and dangerous work, and abusive supervisory practices led to high employee
turnover, violent strikes, and the threat of social instability. Intellectually, industrial relations
were formed at the end of the 19th century as a middle ground between classical economics
and socialism.
The relation between workers and management have undergone tremendous changes in our
country there had been a system of king and his subjects, all should work to improve the
assets of the king. Later Zamindars came and workers were at their mercy - some time bonded
also, later with the formation of East India Company and British Rule a heartless hire and fire
system was established Industrial workers were no mans child neither the employers nor
government cared for them, there were no union also. Gradually enlightened leaders came in
like, Gokale, MK Gandhi Roy, Tilak etc. felt the need for workers union. Their ruthless efforts
forced both governments and the employers to think of workers lot small unions were
reformed, government enacted rules like Trade union Act 1926, Industrial disputes Act etc.
1.5 Limitations
The study of Industrial Relations is comprehensive and vast. Only limited part of it is covered
in this study and detailed briefly.
CHAPTER 2
INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS
Introduction
Industrial relations constitute one of the most delicate and complex problems of the modern
industrial society. This phenomenon of a new complex industrial set-up is directly attributable
to the emergence of Industrial Revolution. The pre-industrial revolution period was
characterized by a simple process of manufacture, small scale investment, local markets and
small number of persons employed. All this led to close proximity between the manager and
the managed. Due to personal and direct relationship between the employer and the employee
it was easier to secure cooperation of the latter. Any grievance or misunderstanding on the
part of either party could be promptly removed. Also, there was no interference by the State
in the economic activities of the people. Under such a set-up industrial relations were simple,
direct and personal. This situation underwent a marked change with the advent of industrial
revolution size of the business increased needing investment of enormous financial and
human resources, there emerged a new class of professional managers causing divorce
between ownership and management, and relations between the employer and the employer
became entranged and gradually antagonistic. This new set-up rendered the old philosophy of
industrial relation irrelevant and gave rise to complex, indirect, and impersonal industrial
relations.
Industry today is neither viewed as a venture of employers alone nor profit if considered as its
sole objective. It is considered to be a venture based on purposeful cooperation between
management and labour in the process of production and maximum social good is regarded as
its ultimate end and both management and employees contribute in their own way towards its
success. Similarly, labour today is no more an unorganized mass of ignorant works ready to
obey without resentment or protest the arbitrary and discretionary dictates of management.
The management has to deal with employees today nto as individuals but also as members of
organized social groups who are very much conscious about their rights and have substantial
bargaining strength. Hence, the objective of evolving and maintaining sound industrial
relations is not only to find our ways and means to solve conflicts to resolve differences but
also to secure the cooperation among the employees in the conduct of industry.
But maintaining smooth industrial relation is not an easy task. Almost all the industrialized
countries of he world fact the problem of establishing and maintaining good management
worker relationships in their industries. Each country has sought to find our solution,
depending upon its economic, social and political environment. However, industrial conflict
still arises and therefore establishment and maintenance of satisfactory industrial relations
forms an important plank in the personnel policies of modern organization.
Meaning
In the broad sense, industrial relations cover all such relationships that a business enterprise
maintains with various sections of the society such as workers, state, customers and public
who come into its contact.
In the narrow sense, it refers to all types of relationships between employer and employees,
trade union and management, works and union and between workers and workers. It also
includes all sorts of relationships at both formal and informal levels in the organization.
The term industrial relations has been variously defined. J.T. Dunlop defines industrial
relations as the complex interrelations among managers, workers and agencies of the
governments. According to Dale Yoder industrial relations is the process of management
dealing with one or more unions with a view to negotiate and subsequently administer
collective bargaining agreement or labour contract.
In industrial relations, therefore, one seeks to study how people get on together at their work,
what difficulties arise between them, how their relations including wages and working
conditions etc., are regulated. Industrial relations, thus, include both industrial relations and
collective relations as well as the role of the state in regulating these relations. Such a
relationship is therefore complex and multidimensional resting on economic, social,
psychological, ethical, occupational, political and legal levels. There are mainly two set of
factors that determine the state of industrial relations whether good or poor in any country.
The first set of factors, described as institutional factors include type of labour legislation,
policy of state relating to labour and industry, extent and stage of development of trade unions
and employers organizations and the type of social institutions. The other set of factors,
described as economic factors include the nature of economic organization capitalist,
socialist technology, the sources of demand and supply in the labour market, the nature and
composition of labour force etc.
Thus, while problem of human relations are personal in character and are related to the
behavior of individuals where moral and social element predominate, the term industrial
relations is comprehensive covering human relations and the relations between the employers
and workers in an organization as well as matters regulated by law or by specific collective
agreement arrived at between trade unions and the management.
However, the concept of industrial relations has undergone a considerable change since the
objective of evolving sound and healthy industrial relations today is not only to find out ways
and means to solve conflicts or resolve difference but also t secure unreserved cooperation
and goodwill to divert their interest and energies toward constructive channel. The problems
of industrial relations are therefore, essentially problems that may be solved effectively only
by developing in conflicting social groups of an industrial undertaking, a sense of mutual
confidence, dependence and respect and at the same time encouraging them to come closer to
each other for removing misunderstanding if any, in a peaceful atmosphere and fostering
industrial pursuits for mutual benefits.
congenial environment resulting in less industrial unrest, grievances and disputes. This
will ensure optimum use of resources, both human and materials, eliminating all types
of wastage.
5. It discourages unfair practices on the part of both management and unions: Industrial
relations involve setting up machinery to solve problems confronted by management
and employees through mutual agreement to which both these parties are bound. This
results in banning of the unfair practices being used by employers or trade unions.
6. It prompts enactment of sound labour legislation: Industrial relations necessitate
passing of certain labour laws to protect and promote the welfare of labour and
safeguard interests of all the parties against unfair means or practices.
7. It facilitates change: Good industrial relations help in improvement of cooperation,
team work, performance and productivity and hence in taking full advantages of
modern inventions, innovations and other scientific and technological advances. It
helps the work force to adjust themselves to change easily and quickly
7. Desire on the part of the workers for higher bonus or DA and the corresponding desire
of the employers to give as little as possible;
8. Inappropriate introduction of automation without providing the right climate;
9. Unduly heavy workloads;
10. Inadequate welfare facilities;
11. Dispute on sharing the gains of productivity;
12. Unfair labour practices, like victimization and undue dismissal;
13. Retrenchment, dismissals and lock-outs on the part of management and strikes on the
part of the workers;
14. Inter-union rivalries; and
15. General economic and political environment, such as rising prices, strikes by others,
and general indiscipline having their effect on the employees attitudes.
Scope
The scope of industrial relations includes all aspects of relationships such as bringing cordial
and healthy labour management relations, creating industrial peace and developing industrial
democracy.
The cordial and healthy labour management relations could be brought in
by collective bargaining.
by evolving various legal measure and setting up various machineries such as Works
Committee, Boards of Conciliation, and Labour Courts etc.
Through tension is more direct in work place; gradually it extends to the whole industry and
sometimes affects the entire economy of the country. Therefore, the management must realize
that efforts are made to set right the situation. Services of specialists in Behavioural Sciences
(namely, psychologists, industrial engineers, human relations expert and personnel managers)
are used to deal with such related problems. Assistance is also taken from economists,
anthropologists, psychiatrists, pedagogists, tec. In resolving conflicts, understanding of human
behavior both individual and groups is a pre-requisite for the employers, the union leaders
and the government more so for the management. Conflicts cannot be resolved unless the
management must learn and know what the basic what the basic needs of men are and how
they can be motivated to work effectively.
It has now been increasingly recognized that much can be gained by the managers and the
worker, if they understand and apply the techniques of human relations approaches to
industrial relations. The workers are likely to attain greater job satisfaction, develop greater
involvement in their work and achieve a measure of identification of their objectives with the
objectives of the organization; the manager, on their part, would develop greater insight and
effectiveness in their work.
The willingness and ability of management and trade unions to deal with the problems
freely, independently and with responsibility.
They must make the employees feel that they are genuinely interested in their personal
development. To this end, adequate opportunities for appropriate programmes of
18training and development should be provided.
They must evolve well conceived and scientific wage and salary plan so that the
employees may receive just compensation for their efforts. They must devise, develop
and implement a proper incentive plan for personnel at all levels in the organization.
They must evolve, establish and utilize appropriate machineries for speedy redressal
of employees grievances.
are set up for the protection of different interests- these are some of the major issues of
industrial relations system.
The Triangle of Industrial Relations System represents multi-pronged relationship between
management, trade unions and workers.
Industrial Relations Systems responsibility implies: (a) Inter-vertex Relationship (amongst
management, trade unions and workers inter se) and, (b) Inter-societal obligations.
Management relationship vis--vis trade unions is based on increasing realization that trade
unionism has to come to stay as a necessary concomitant of the contemporary capitalist them;
and, that trade unions movement is the expression of the workers collective determination to
recover emotional security lost through Industrial revolution.
Management relationship vis--vis workers revolves round the themes like attitude towards
work; industrial democracy; urge for greater degree of control over work situation; search for
an environment, where worker can take roots and where he belongs to; and, identification of
the functions, where he sees the purpose of his work and feels important in achieving it.
Management approach towards itself presupposes management as a social task. Since life is
based on conflict, the management task in the long-run is directed towards harmonizing this
conflict inside and outside the enterprise. The art and science of management is highly
sophisticated with theories, concepts and models of management.
Trade union relationship vis--vis management is conditioned by accepting the fact that
management presents an indissoluble partnership amongst interest, power and responsibility
in the societal context.
Trade Union relationship vis--vis workers implied that it should appreciate workers
aspirations and expectations that trade union is essentially a protective, friendly society, meant
primarily to manage and handle their economic, social and cultural problems. Often
aspirations of workers are at variance with those of leaders in the trade union movement.
Trade union approach towards itself is based on the premise that trade unionism is a
management system. Trade Unions as organizations generally viewed themselves as an end
rather than as a means centering on cause and not on man, which, in turn, creates an
attitude of convalescence and the cause of unconsciousness. There is often a tendency in trade
unionism to promote mass movement instead of an organisation, and its membership is
often based on calamity features rather than on positive factors. In a changing situation like
India, ideological postures are of limited relevance in the realm of trade unionism, which has
Organisation
Adjustment an
Attitudes
Representation
Economic responsibility
Discipline
There is an imperative need of strengthening the democracy and freedom within the trade
unions, encourage workers participation in the process of decision-making and developing
new perspectives in the personnel problems of the trade unionism.
Management and trade unions both have to be aware of the changing value system, the needs
of a new breed of employee, the ever-increasing generational gap in attitudes towards
money, emphasis on quality of life, publics lower frustration tolerance, changing attitudes
towards work and leisure, educations impact on peoples self-image, rejection of
authoritarianism and dogmatism, greater stress on pluralism and individualism, and search of
identity, self-esteem and self-realization. The ideology based on rationality; moral absolutes
leading to situational ethics; and, economic efficiency resulting in social justice; are the new
bases and postulates for shaping the future industrial relations system in the Indian context.
corporation has to develop as a social institution, where people share success and failure,
create ideas, interact and work for development and realization of the individuals potential as
human being.
Since Industrial Relations is a function of three variables management, trade unions and
workers, a workable approach towards planning for healthy labour-management relations can
be developed by:
For achieving the objectives of improved management trade union the following line fo
action is suggested:
A realistic attitude of managers towards employees and vice versa for humanizing
industrial relations.
Whatever, labour laws may lay down, it is the approach of the management and union which
matters and unless both are enlightened, industrial harmony is not possible. In fact both
managements and workers need a change in their philosophy and attitudes towards each
other. In all fairness, both management and workers should not look upon themselves as two
separate and distinct segments of an organization, but on the contrary, realize that both are
partners in an enterprise working for the success of the organization for their mutual benefit
and interest. It is becoming increasingly obvious that industrial peace amongst all participants
in the industrial relations systems requires truth as foundation, justice as its rule, love as its
driving force, and liberty as its atmosphere.
CHAPTER 3
TRADE UNIONISM
Trade unionism is a worldwide movement and the highly strategic position occupied by trade
unions in modern industrial society has been widely recognized. In most cases, employees
associations or trade unions seem to have emerged as protest movements reaching against
the working relationships and condition created by industrialization. When industrialization
begins, organization members have to be generally recruited from the ranks of former
agricultural labour and artisans who have to adapt themselves to the changed conditions of
industrial employment. They have to be provided with new types of economic security
wages / salaries, benefits and services etc. Often they may have to learn to live together in
newly developing industrial townships and cities and also to adopt themselves to new working
conditions and new pattern of work-rules imposing discipline and setting pace of work to
which they are unfamiliar. Their old habits and traditions do not suffice to guide them in their
daily work-behaviour and in consequence they may be disorganized and frustrated. Thus the
growth of modern industrial organizations involving the employment of a large number of
workers / employees in new type of working conditions and environment makes them helpless
in bargaining individually for their terms of employment. As observed by Frank Tannenbaum,
The emergence of trade unionism lies in the Industrial Revolution which disrupted the older
way of life and created a new society forged by the shop, the factory, the mine and the
industry.
Meaning
The term Trade Union has been defined in various ways because of wide differences in the
use of this term in different countries. Of all the definitions of a trade union, the classic
definition of the Webbs has been most popular. According to them a trade union is a
continuous association of wage-earners for the purpose of maintaining or improving the
condition of their working lives. Since this definition does not cover all the extensions of
trade union activities in modern times, a trade union with some modification may be redefined
as a continuous association of wage-earners or salaried employees for maintaining the
conditions of their working lives and ensuring them a better and healthier status in industry as
well as in the society.
One of the main reasons of workers joining a trade union been their belief to get
wages increased and maintained at a reasonable standard through collective action and
their realization that individual bargaining was utterly useless for this purpose.
The employees may join the unions to ensure a just and fair dealing by management.
Through collective strength, they restrain the management from taking any such action
which may be irrational, illogical, discriminatory or contrary to their general interests.
Another reason of employees joining some union may be the broader realization on
their part that unions fulfill the important need for adequate machinery for proper
maintenance of labour-management relations.
Employees may join the unions because of their belief that it is an effective way to
secure adequate protection form various types of hazards and income insecurity such
as accident injury, illness, unemployment etc.
The employees may join the unions because of their feeling that this would enable
them to communicate their views, ideas, feelings and frustrations to the management
effectively.
Individuals may join the unions in the hope of finding a job through their influence in
the company management.
Enlargement of functions
The N.C.L. has stated that the unions must pay greater attention to the basic needs of its
members which are:
CHAPTER 4
4.1 INDUSTRIAL DISPUTES
Meaning
According to Section 2(K) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, and industrial dispute
means any dispute or difference between employers and employees or between employers
and workmen or between workmen and workmen, which is connected with the employment
or non-employment or the terms of employment or with the conditions of labour of any
person.
Thus form the legal point of view, industrial dispute does not merely refer to difference
between labour and capital as is generally thought, but it refers to differences that affect
groups of workmen and employers engaged in an industry. Essentially, therefore, the
differences of opinions between employers and workmen in regard to employment, nonemployment, terms of employment or the conditions of labour where the contesting parties
are directly and substantially interested in maintaining their respective contentious constitute
the subject-matter of an industrial dispute.
Lack of proper fixation of wages inconformity with cost of living and a reasonable
wage structure generally.
Lack of strong and healthy trade unionism, lack of a proper policy of union
recognition and inter-union rivalries.
A fall in the standard of discipline among employees largely due to wrong or improper
leadership, often resulting in insubordination or disobedience on the part of
employees.
Combination of too much law and too little respect for law even at high levels.
Growing factional and personal difference among rank-and-file employees who are
union members or union leaders and a tendency on the part of the management in
some cases to prefer having with outside leaders and not give due respect to workerleaders.
Agitation and wrong propaganda by selfish labour leaders to further their own
interests of their own party.
Forms of Disputes
Strikes and lockouts are the most common forms of disputes.
Strike
Strike means a cessation of work by a body of persons employed in any industry acting in
combination; or a concerted refusal or a refusal under a common understanding or an number
of persons who are or have been so employed to continue to work or to accept employment.
Lockout
Section 2(1) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 defines lockout to mean the temporary
closing of a place of employment or the suspension of work, or the refusal by an employers to
continue to employ any number of persons employed by him, lockout, thus, is the counterpart
of strike the corresponding weapon the hands of employer to resist the collective demands
of workmen or to enforce his terms. It has been held by the courts that the suspension of work
as a disciplinary measure does not amount to lockout. Similarly, temporary suspension of
work called lay-off is not lock-out.
In the Indian context, grievance may be said to the representation by a worker, a group of
workers or the unions to the management relation to the terms and conditions of employment,
breach of the freedom of association or the provisions of standing orders or nonimplementation of the Government orders, conciliation agreeme4nts or adjudicators awards.
It may also include representation against non-compliance with provision of a collective
agreement in an establishment where it has been signed.
Grievances usually result in definite and considerable loses to employee morale, efficiency
and productivity. The accumulation of grievance leads to strikes, lock outs and other forms of
conflicts. Therefore, proper disposal of grievances deserves special and adequate
consideration in any programme of harmonizing industrial relations.
Areas of Grievances
Grievances resulting from working conditions
Poor payment
Leave facilities
Seniority
Transfer
Promotion
Communication gap
CHAPTER 5
5.1 Workers Participation in Management
Workers participation in management is in essential ingredient of industrial democracy. The
concept of workers participation in management is based in Human Relations approach to
management which brought about new set of values to labour and management.
Traditionally, the concept of Workers Participation in Management (WPM) refers to
participation of non-managerial employees in the decision-making process of the
organisation. Workers participation in management meets the psychological needs of the
workers to a greater extent. That way it may also be treated as the process of delegation of
authority in the general areas of managerial functions.
According to one view, workers participation is based on the fundamental concept that the
ordinary worker invest his labour in, and ties his fate to, his place of work and, therefore,
he has a legitimate right to have a share in influencing the various aspects of company
policy.
To quote the version of British Institute of Management, Workers participation in
management is the practice in which employees take part in management decisions and it
is based on the assumption of commonality of interest between employer and employee in
furthering the long term prospects of the enterprise and those working in it.
According to G.S. Walpole, participation in management gives the workers a sense of
importance, price and accomplishment; it given him the freedom and the opportunity for
self-expression; a feeling of belonging to his place of work and a sense of workmanship
and creativity. It provides for the integration of his interest with those of the management
and makes him a joint partner in the enterprise.
Dr. Alexander considers a management to be participative, if it gives scope to the
workers to influence its decision making process on any level or sphere or if it shares with
them some if its managerial prerogatives.
In should be borne in mid that when individuals are provided with opportunities for
expression and share in decision-making, they show much initiative and accept
responsibility substantially. The rationale of workers participation in management lies in
that it helps in creation amongst the workers a sense of involvement in their organisation,
a better understanding of their role in the smooth functioning of industry and provides
them a means of self-realization, thereby, promoting efficiency and increased productivity.
review participation schemes and the bill also has provision of punishment for those who
contravene any of the provision of the Act.
Thus the workers participation schemes in India provide wide scope for application and
upliftment of workers. But in practice, these schemes have not met with success though they
are successful in some private sector units. The factors responsible for the failure are:
Attitude of the management towards the scheme is not encouraging. The preventatives
of workers are not given due recognition by the management.
The attitude of trade unions towards the schemes is negative as they consider these
schemes are reducing the power of Trade Unions. Some Trade Unions boycott Joint
Management Council meetings.
Management should appreciate the scheme and accept them in full faith.
Thus workers participation in management in India has yet to succeed. It can be done by
educating the workers, creating an environment in the organisatoin for coordination of
workers and management.
collective strength to bargain with employer. It also provides the employers some control over
the employees.
The process of collective bargaining is bipartite in nature, i.e. the negotiations are between the
employers and employees without a third partys intervention. Thus collective bargaining
serves to bridge the emotional and physiological gulf between the workers and employers
though direct discussions.
Meaning
The term collective bargaining is made up of two words, collective which means a group
action through representation and bargaining, means negotiating, which involves
proposals and counter-proposals, offers and counter-offers. Thus it means collective
negotiations between the employer and the employee, relating to their work situations. The
success of these negotiations depends upon mutual understanding and give and take principles
between the employers and employees.
Definitions
Collective bargaining has different meanings for different individuals or groups. Trade
Unions, management and public interpret the term in their own ways. Let us now discuss
some leading definitions:
According to the Encyclopedia of social sciences, Collective bargaining is a process of
discussion and negotiation between two parties, one or both of whom is a group of persons
acting in concert. The resulting bargain is an understanding as to the terms and conditions
which a continuing service is to be performed. More specifically, collective bargaining is a
procedure, by which employer and a group of employees agree upon the conditions of work.
Richardson says, Collective bargaining takes place when a number of work people enter into
negotiation as a bargaining unit with an employer or a group of employers with the object of
reaching agreement on conditions of the employment of the work people.
The I.L.O. workers manual defines collective bargaining as, negotiation about working
conditions and terms of employment between an employer, a group of employers or one or
more employers organizations, on the one hand, and one or more representative workers
organisation on the other with a view of reaching an agreement.
Salient Features
It is a continuous process which can establish regular and stable relationship between
workers organisatoin and management.
Importance
Whatever labour laws may lay down, it is the approach of employers and trade unions which
matters and unless both are enlightened, industrial harmony is not possible. Therefore, the
solution to common problems can be found directly through negotiation between both parties
and in this context the scope of collective bargaining is very great.
Collective bargaining is really beneficial forms the stand part of employees and their unions
as well as management. If it works well, it develops a sense of self-responsibility and selfrespect among the employees concerned and thus significantly paves the way for improved
employee morale and productivity.
Collective bargaining restricts managements freedom for arbitrary action and thereby
management learns a new code of behaviour by conceiving of the union as a method of
dealing with employees. The management also comes to know the grievances of workers in
advance and it gives an opportunity to take precautionary measure. Moreover, collective
bargaining opens u the channel of communication between top and bottom levels of an
organization.
From the point of the view of the society, collective bargaining; if property conducted, result
in the establishment of a harmonious industrial climate which helps for the socio-economic
development of the nation. It builds up a system of industrial jurisprudence by introducing
civil rights in industry and ensures that management is conduct by rules rather than by a
arbitrary decisions. It extends the democratic principles from the political to industrial field.
CHAPTER 6
6.1 EMPLOYEE COMMUNICATION
More effective human relations is engendered through adequate communication. The origin of
the word communication lies in the Latin word communis denoting common.
Therefore communication is concerned with imparting a common idea or understanding and
covers any type of behaviour resulting in an exchange of meaning.
An executives working day is filled with communication of different types like orders,
reports, conversations and rumours. Communication is vital in the relationship between
executive and their subordinates. It is through effective communication that an executive
ultimately gets work done by others. Therefore to be effective, every executive must know
how to communicate. Whilst the tradionalists viewed the communication purpose as
providing the means whereby a plan can be implemented and action coordinated towards the
common goal or end result; the behaviouralists looked upon it as a means whereby persons in
the organisatoin can be motivated to execute such plans enthusiastically and willingly.
Whatever viewpoint is accepted, effective communications requires an appreciation of its
meaning and objectives as well as of the barriers which effective communication.
Objectives of Communication
Management depends upon communications to achieve organizational objectives. Since
managers work with and through other people, all their acts, policies, rules, orders and
procedures must pass through some kind of communication channel. Also there must be
To discourage the spread of misinformation, ambiguity and rumors; which can cause
conflict and tension.
To foster any attitude which is necessary for motivation, cooperation and job
satisfaction.
To develop information and understanding among all workers and this is necessary for
group effort.
To encourage subordinates to supply ideas and suggestions for improving upon the
product or work environment and taking these suggestions seriously.
Importance of Communication
Inter-personal roles require managers to interact with supervisors, sub-ordinates, peers and
other outside the organisation. Thus, or co-ordinate action, communication is necessary.
Communication transforms a group of unrelated individuals into a term that knows what its
goals are and how it will try to reach them.
Communication allows people to co-ordinate by providing them with a way to share
information. The first type of information that needs to be shared is what the goals of the
organisatoins are. People need to know where they are heading and why. They also need
directions for their specific tasks.
Communication is especially important for the task of decision-making. Decision-makes must
share their views on what the problem is and what the alternatives are. Once a decision has
been made, communication is necessary to implement the decision and to evaluate its results.
had very different conceptions of workers educations. To some, it meant education of the
workers as a trade unionist, to others, it meant basic education for workers who lacked
opportunity in formal schooling, to still others, it meant education of the workers as a
member of the community and as a producer, consumer or citizen.
The term workers education has assumed different meanings in different countries due to
historical reasons. In the United States of America workers education is considered as
synonymous with training in trade union leadership. In the U.K. it covers trade unionism,
general adult education and vocational education. In many countries of Western Europe,
workers education refers to education in citizenship. In the developing countries, including
India, the term workers education is used in its wider connotation and aims at making the
worker a better operative, a better union member and a better citizen.
According to Harry Laidlar, Workers education is an attempt on the part of the organized
labour to educate his own members under in educational system in which the workers
prescribe the courses of instruction, select the teachers and in considerable measure furnish
the finance. The definition emphasizes upon:
The educational system should be such in which the workers themselves prepare the
syllabi and curricula and themselves select the teachers; and
The system of education should be financed by the fund of the union concerned.
Florence Peterson observes, The workers education, as commonly used, in not a generic
term but has a specific connotation. It is a special kind of adult education designed to give
workers a better understanding for their status, problem, rights and responsibilities as workers,
as union members, as consumers and as citizens.
According to another authority, Workers education and trade union are synonymous, since
the chief aim of workers, education is to equip the trade unions to take a more active interest
in the movement. But trade union education is narrower in scope in as much as it only
confines itself in training workers to become good members of trade union whereas the
workers education besides providing the workers the training in trade unions also aims at
social and fundamental education as that is given with view to making a worker a good citizen
as well as a good member of the trade union.
According to the Encyclopedia of Social sciences, Workers Education seeks to help the
worker solve his problems not as an individual but as a member of his social class. aS a
whole, workers education has to take into consideration the educational needs of the worker
as an individual for his personal evolution; as an operative for his efficiency and
advancement; as a citizen for a happy and integrated life in the community; as a member of
a trade union for the protection of his interests as a member of the working class..
It is , therefore, to bridge the lacuna by illiteracy, to create better understanding of work and
ones own place in national economy, to prepare worker for effective collaboration with the
management, to make him a better citizen, to create leadership among the ranks of labour, to
replace outsiders in trade unions and ultimately to make them conscious of their rights and
responsibilities that workers education aims at.
The scope of workers education is much wider than that of trade union education.
In workers education, the workers themselves form the curriculum and select their
own teaches.
The institutions providing workers education are controlled, financed and managed by
the workers.
It is based upon the idea of gaining more the more strength for the bargaining power
of trade and producing workers who should behave as workers,
It differs from vocational and professional education as its main aim is to train a
worker for his group advancement and for the solution of group problems, whereas
vocational and professional education aims at individual advancement.
Understand the basic economic and technical aspect of the industry and the plant
where he is employed so that he can take an intelligent interest in its affairs;
Understand the organisatoin and functioning of the union as well as develop qualities
of leadership, loyalty and devotion towards trade union work so that the can
intelligently participate in the affairs of his union;
Lead a clean and healthy life based on a firm ethical foundations; and
CASE
When computerization was studied at Life Insurance corporation of India Mount Road
madras office few years before all the workers and staff came out to the streets saying we will
not allow computer to enter our office It will enter on our dead body only Such severe
opposition was there in the L.I.C against technology advancement of course today even the
lowest paid may be having a computer in their house When this is the problem of technology
and Industrial Relation we have to approach it continuously in a gentle supportive way.
STUDY
1. Even before the machines are to come workers, are to be taken in to confidence tell them,
educate them, and sell them so that they can own them.
2. Tell the workers the disadvantages of remaining static explain the competition prevailing
around the industry locally, and internationally. Explain then how our leather technology has
fallen behind and our leather shops are closing, explain how our domestic articles
consumables are falling down behind china invasion in marketing we have to awake, arise
and proceed in technological advance to compete.
CONCLUSION
It has been increasingly realized that the industrial system has brought about a number of
complexities which have rendered the management of people in an organization more difficult
and complicated than man power management in earlier and simpler societies because free,
mobile men and women in modern societies whose complex and ever changing problems for
their managers and employers. Therefore, todays industrial societies have developed a
distinct system of management based upon the experience of over 300 years.
Modern industrial relations represent a blending of older systems with innovation introduced
as society has changed through the ages. Some features of early system even now persist,
while other features are the result of industrial revolution and, therefore, represent sharp
breaks with traditional, creating challenging problems for the management for many of them
may be opposed by the workers.
The employment relationships are not static but dynamic. The most important characteristic
is the persistence of change. Technological advances eliminate long established jobs and
create opportunities that require sharply different patterns of experience and education.
Higher living standards encourage demands for new products and services. Economic
prosperity permits great economic security, and public regulation makes the assurance of that
security a problem for managers. All of these changes have made the present system of
employment relationships very complex. Collaboration and cooperation is very necessary to
achieve the designated objectives. Understanding of human behavior is, therefore, very
necessary on the part of those responsible for managing manpower resources.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
WEBSITES LINK TILL 15TH OCTOBER 2014
http://www.rahulgladwin.com/noteblog/business/IR/concept-scope-and-objectives-ofindustrial-relations.php
http://mona1634.files.wordpress.com/2012/08/approaches-to-ir-pdf.pdf
http://mospi.nic.in/Mospi_New/upload/SYB2013/CH-41-TRADE%20UNIONS/Trade
%20Unions.pdf
http://www.lawteacher.net/employment-law/essays/grievance-redressal-mechanismunder-industrial-disputes-act-employment-law-essay.php
http://www.dol.govt.nz/er/starting/unions/Unions-and-Collective-Bargaining.pdf