Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
New German Critique and Duke University Press are collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and
extend access to New German Critique.
http://www.jstor.org
one has incurred would again become a nuisance. And all previous history is
still human prehistory, that is, not consciously produced. This history shows
human self-alienation in various and variously vehement forms. For the most
part, it still shows "Nature" in the Hegelian sense, in the sense of a beingoutside-oneself, in which the powers produced by mankind, but not comprehended as produced, have broken away and become reified. Hence, they
appear as an uncontrollable fate, which they have in fact been in previous
history. The so-called iron logic of events proceeds behind the backs of the
individual actors and their consciousness, thus completely without the light of
logic. Completely as a blind, external necessity and consequently a contingency, completely without mediation with the human subject, like a landslide
or a conflagration in Nature, which is independent of mankind. All human
activity--measured against something completely satisfying, indeed fulfilling
-has been called patchwork, and the possible fulfillment lies by nature not
within history, but puts an end to it; that is the religious view. But previous
history displays this patchwork to an extent that is not even necessary on
earth: in the misery of by far the majority of people, in production
relationships whose provisionality, whose finiteness as it were, is proved by the
fact that they have again and again become strait jackets. Whereupon the
human subjects as well as the productive forces constituted or unleashed by
them have fallen into a renewed tension with the present objectivities of
existence. Dialectics, in the world made by mankind, is the relationship of
subject and object, nothing else; it is subjectivity working its way forward,
again and again overtaking the objectivation and objectivity it has attained,
and seeking to explode them. In the final analysis, the needy subject, by
finding itself and its work inadequately objectified, is always the motor of
historically appearing contradictions. It is the intensive motor which is set
into motion as a consequence of the inadequacy of the achieved form of
existence, and which, by contradicting the contradiction within the thing
itself, activates in a revolutionary way the contradiction stemming from the
inadequacy of these forms to the totum of the subject's content. For if
unfulfilled need is the motive and motor of the dialectical-material motion,
then-on the basis of the same, not yet present content-the
totality of the
not present All (Alles) is its cohering goal. Further: omnia sub luna caduca,
everything beneath the moon is perishable (likewise above the moon):
however, this perishability, this barrier and finiteness, presupposes the
non-resigning desire of a subject as well as a real not yet frozen possibility in
the world in order even to appear as a barrier, much less a superable one. The
point has not yet been reached where society can go no further, where an "in
vain" would be conferred upon history. Most assuredly the point is not yet
AND HOPE 5
DIALECTICS
visible, except in mere anticipations of the direction, where the All of the
Real and the General (des Eigentlichen und Ueberhaupt) could rest its head
even fleetingly. It would be the same as the truth of phenomenal being; this is
not spurious or mere so-called factual truth as a static truth of havingbecome-so; neither is it, however, truth passed off as being pan-logical,
making its peace with the world by presenting its having-become-so as a
having-succeeded. Dialectical truth can least of all be such an apologetic, in
spite of and, in a certain sense, precisely because of Hegel. Truth in the sense
meant here of the Real and the General has above all nothing to do with some
sort of heavenly light, which allegedly has already come home; such a mythological hypostasis likewise foists off perfection as something already attained
and existing, only in an imaginary place. The question of truth which
philosophy poses cannot even be understood, much less answered, by
mythology. In this particular sense Hegel very rightly says: "Philosophy must
avoid wanting to be edifying" (II, 9); for the superstition of a supraterrestrial-static empiricism has been for philosophy even more of a barrier
before the unattained than has the dogma of a terrestrial-static empiricism.
There is quite a different meaning, however, if, instead of various idolatries
or the worship of an existing absolute (be it called fact or mechanical matter
or hypostasis of God), Hope seeks the truth of history: as its most powerful
know-thyself or its uncovered face. As the not yet present truth of the Real
and the General extremely threatened in the process leading to its existence,
as the still utopian totum of the goal. This truth need by no means beware of
being edifying; on the contrary: an intensely illuminating, intensely fulfilling
nature is the constituent of truth in this second sense. Hegel did not merely
renew the old unchanging condition for truth, that it should be the
correspondence of perception with its object, but he immediately turned this
into an objective-identifying condition, that truth is the correspondence of
the object with itself, in such a way that reality should be appropriate to its
concept, i.e., to reason. In the latter condition, no matter how much it
remains situated upon the form of existence or entelechia as marked at any
particular time, that volitional, value-predicating character of truth in the
fulfilling sense is operative. The practical Idea of the Good is operative in it:
"Untrue means roughly bad, inadequate (unangemessen). In this sense a bad
state is an untrue state, and the bad and the untrue in general exist in the
contradiction that occurs between the constitution and the concept and the
existence of an object." And further, with the most familiar pathos of the
Goal and its truth, for which the dialectics is the vehicle: "All finite things
have an untruth in them; they have a concept and an existence which,
however, is inadequate to their concept. Therefore they must perish, by
Hegel, who only recognizes what is of itself already extant in time and space.
That is the limit of idealist dialectics: it is the limit of mere contemplation,
which per se ipsum is applied to what is past and its horizons, to an essence
which has been revealed in the phenomena that have already come into
of the teleological content have a
existence. Dissatisfaction-hope-totum
function only in a dialectics which do not take place in the head and draw out
their purely idealistic movements over something that is objectively static.
Knowledge itself becomes transformative only in these dialectics, a dialectics
of events, which are not contemplated, not enclosed within contemplated
history. It is not applied merely to the knowable past, but to a real becoming,
to that which is occurring and not yet finished, to a knowable and pursuable
future content. S is not yet P, the proletariat has not yet been sublated (aufgehoben), nature is not yet a home, the real is not yet articulated reality: this
Not Yet is in process, indeed it has attained or is beginning to carve out its
skyline here and there. At the same time, it creates the believed meaning
(Sinnglauben) of true human effort and the effort's militant optimism.
Precisely for that reason, the dialectic agent of the Not, which drives forward
through all the stagnation and reification to the articulation and manifestation of its own enigmatic, teleological content, is, according to its All,
nothing more, but certainly nothing less, than hope. And as tested hope,
docta spes, hope is the critically anticipatory dialectic materialist knowledge
which is mediated and allied with the objective process. In this way, the
dialectical principle, S is not yet P, means with respect to what is inadequately
determined (has become restraining): Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse
delendam. In respect to the imminent adequate determinability (of the
contentual Novum) it means: Quidquid latet apparebit.
4. Mankind is not yet finished; therefore, neither is its past. It continues to
affect us under a different sign, in the drive of its questions, in the experiment
of its answers; we are all in the same boat. The dead return transformed:
those whose actions were too bold to have come to an end (like Thomas
Miinzer); those whose work is too all-encompassing to have coincided with the
locality of their times (like Aeschylus, Dante, Shakespeare, Bach, Goethe).
The discovery of the future in the past, that is the philosophy of history,
hence, of philosophical history as well. The farewell to Hegel is therefore none
at all, no more than the first encounter with him, when it has caught fire,
seems like a first one. As far as the power and continued ripening of this work
are concerned, Hegel creates a continuous, a happily fruitful, an admiringly
1. "Among other things, I am of the opinion that Carthage must be destroyed," was said so
frequently by Cato that it practically became his motto. "Whatever is hidden will appear" recalls
the Bible.
grateful reunion. Times of transition, such as the present age, make one
sensitive to the genius of dialectics, to the great teacher. Precisely because the
owl of Minerva does not fly in the dusk, among the ruins of contemplation, in
the thoroughly false circle of circles, but rather because a thought is rising
which belongs to the dawn, to that open time of day which is least alien of all
to Minerva, the goddess of light. Times of transition: today there are such
times of a very strong type, in the sense of the fermenting and threatened
departure to a form of existence more similar to the human. An evolutionary
word of the master of dialectics is very apt here; in it the owl has even become
what it really is for Minerva: the allegory of vigilance. In 1816 Hegel wrote to
his friend Niethammer: "I hold the view that the World Spirit has given the
times the order to advance; such an order is obeyed; this being strides
forward like an armored, firmly closed phalanx, irresistibly and as imperceptibly as the sun moves, through thick and thin; it is flanked by
innumerable light troops for and against it; most of them have no idea of
what is at stake, and only get knocked on over the head, as if by an invisible
hand. All the hesitant fibbing and sophisticated shadow boxing in the world is
of no help against it; it can only reach about as high as the shoelaces of this
colossus and smear a bit of mud or shoe polish on them, but it cannot loosen
them, much less remove the divine shoes with the elastic soles or the sevenleague boots, if the colossus puts them on. The safest game (both inwardly
and outwardly) is, I dare say, to keep one's eye on the advancing giant." The
drill regulations of the eighteenth century, from which the movements of this
simile stem, have been lost, but the image of the advancing giant, mutatis
mutandis, is not yet completely incomprehensible even today. The rational
can become real, the real rational; it all depends upon the phenomenology or
the phenomenal history of true action. This is the action of the true or the
ending of its continuing prehistory, it is the changing of the world in
accordance with its understood dialectic-material tendency, it is the agreement of human theory-practice with a reality that is in accordance with itself.
Passive contemplation has no place here anywhere; on the contrary,
knowledge, for which there is theoretically no barrier, must prove itself to be
equally practical in the socialist liberation from the barrier, in the breaking
up of servitude and of the rule of necessity. Here, above all, Marxism is qualitatively differentiated from every previous philosophy, hence from the
Hegelian as well, to which it is closest. For with a leap into the new such as
previous history had never experienced there begins through Marx--with a
continuation as well as a sublation of Hegel - the changing of philosophy into
a philosophy of changing the world. Philosophy is no longer philosophy zf it is
not dialectical-materialist, but, as must be grasped now and for the entire