Lakeport City Council Agenda Packet

AGENDA
REGULAR MEETING OF THE LAKEPORT CITY COUNCIL AND THE BOARD

OF DIRECTORS OF THE CITY OF LAKEPORT MUNICIPAL SEWER DISTRICT
Tuesday, March 03, 2015
City Council Chambers, 225 Park Street, Lakeport, California 95453
Any person may speak for three (3) minutes on any agenda item; however, total public input per item is not to exceed 15 minutes, extended at the discretion of the
City Council. This rule does not apply to public hearings. Non-timed items may be taken up at any unspecified time.
I.
CALL TO ORDER & ROLL CALL:
II.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE:
III.
ACCEPTANCE OF AGENDA:
Urgency Items:
IV.
V.
VI.
6:00 p.m.
Move to accept agenda as posted, or move to add or delete items.

To add item, Council is required to make a majority decision that an urgency exists
(as defined in the Brown Act) and a 2/3rds determination that the need to take
action arose subsequent to the Agenda being posted.
CONSENT AGENDA:
The following Consent Agenda items are expected to be routine and noncontroversial. They will be acted upon by the
Council at one time without any discussion. Any Council Member may request that any item be removed from the
Consent Agenda for discussion under the regular Agenda. Removed items will be considered following the Consent
Calendar portion of this agenda.
A.
Ordinances:
Waive reading except by title, of any ordinances under consideration at this

meeting for either introduction or passage per Government Code Section 36934.
B.
Warrants:
Approve warrant registers from February 10, 2015 and February 20, 2015.
C.
Minutes:
Approve minutes of the regular City Council meeting of February 17, 2015.
D.
Application 2015-005
Approve Application 2015-005 for Future Pros for their annual Future Pros Bass
Championship Tournament to be held in Library Park.
E.
New Police Department Building
Adopt a resolution authorizing the acquisition of 2025 South Main Street,

Lakeport, CA and authorizing the City Manager to execute the Escrow document.
PUBLIC PRESENTATIONS/REQUESTS:
A.
Citizen Input:
Any person may speak for 3 minutes about any subject within the authority of the City Council, provided that the
subject is not already on tonights agenda. Persons wishing to address the City Council are required to complete a
Citizens Input form and submit it to the City Clerk prior to the meeting being called to order. While not required,
please state your name and address for the record. NOTE: Per Government Code 54954.3(a), the City Council cannot
take action or express a consensus of approval or disapproval on any public comments regarding matters which do not
appear on the printed agenda.
B.
Presentation - REMIF
Mark Ferguson of REMIF will present information regarding self-insurance.
C.
Certificate of Achievement
Present Certificate of achievement from the CHP to the City of Lakeport in

recognition of the City achieving 2 consecutive Satisfactory ratings in the BIT
program, since October 3, 2013
COUNCIL BUSINESS:
A.
Community Development Director

1. Vector Control
1.
2.
3.
VII.
CITY COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS:

A.
VIII.
Introduce the proposed Zone Change Ordinance; and schedule a public

hearing on April 7, 2015 for the second reading of the Zone Change
Ordinance.
Adopt a Resolution for General Plan Amendment GPA 13-01
Adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration for the proposed project based on
the Environmental Review/Initial Study ER 13-01.
Miscellaneous Reports, if any:
ADJOURNMENT:
Adjourn
Materials related to an item on this Agenda submitted to the Council after distribution of the agenda packet are available for public inspection in the City Clerks Office at 225
Park Street, Lakeport, California, during normal business hours. Such documents are also available on the City of Lakeports website, www.cityoflakeport.com, subject to
staffs ability to post the documents before the meeting.
The City of Lakeport, in complying with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), requests individuals who require special accommodations to access, attend and/or
participate in the City meeting due to disability, to please contact the City Clerks Office, (707) 263-5615, 72 hours prior to the scheduled meeting to ensure reasonable
accommodations are provided.
_______________________________________
Hilary L. Britton, Department Secretary
EXPENSE APPROVAL REGISTER

Packet: APPKT00011 - WARRANTS 02-10-2015
Lakeport, CA
Vendor Name
Payable Number
Post Date
Description (Payable)
Fund: 110 - GENERAL FUND

MEDIACOM
VERIZON WIRELESS
NOR-CAL TELECOM
GOV'T STAFFING SERVICES, INC.
OE PUBLIC & MISC EE'S
DEBRA ENGLAND
LAKEPORT DISPOSAL, INC.
R.E.M.I.F.
012115
9739563880
595
125107
FEB 2015
FEB 2015
FEB 2015
020915
MAR 2015
01/21/2015
01/25/2015
01/09/2015
12/05/2014
02/01/2015
02/01/2015
02/01/2015
02/10/2015
02/09/2015
LEAF CHARGES
110-1052-921001
CELL PHONES
110-3020-921000
CHANGE LINE SELECTION
110-3030-930000
TEMP STAFF/AKABA
110-1052-930000
MEDICAL/FEB 2015
110-0000-209001
MEDICAL/FEB 2015
110-2010-911000
JANITORIAL SVC/FEB 2015
110-3030-930000
Trash Pymts Jan 13 - Feb 9, 20 110-3040-930000
DENT,VIS,LIFE,LTD,EAP/MAR 2 110-0000-209003
Fund 110 - GENERAL FUND Total:
Fund: 501 - WATER UTILITY M & O FUND

MEDIACOM
012115
01/21/2015
LEAF CHARGES
501-1052-921001
Fund 501 - WATER UTILITY M & O FUND Total:
258.50
258.50
Fund: 504 - USDA WATER PROJECT FUND

ADAMS ASHBY GROUP, LLC.
1281
PACE ENGINEERING, INC.
23593
FARR CONSTRUCTION CORP
8
01/02/2015
01/08/2015
12/31/2014
USDA WATER PROJECT

504-3060-930000
WATER SYSTEM IMPROV PROJ 504-3060-930000
STORAGE TANK PROJECT
504-3060-990000
Fund 504 - USDA WATER PROJECT FUND Total:
2,760.00
15,220.75
172,931.78
190,912.53
Fund: 601 - CLMSD UTILITY M & O FUND

MEDIACOM
012115
01/21/2015
LEAF CHARGES
601-1052-921001
Fund 601 - CLMSD UTILITY M & O FUND Total:
258.50
258.50
Fund: 801 - OPEB AGENCY FUND

FEB 2015
R.E.M.I.F.
MAR 2015
02/01/2015
02/09/2015
MEDICAL/FEB 2015
801-0000-916000
DENT,VIS,LIFE,LTD,EAP/MAR 2 801-0000-916000
Fund 801 - OPEB AGENCY FUND Total:
1,926.00
1,405.12
3,331.12
Grand Total:
247,055.26
2/10/2015 4:33:28 PM
Account Number
Amount
517.00
152.80
90.00
2,890.00
2,040.00
8,158.00
675.00
33,186.18
4,585.63
52,294.61
Page 1 of 2
EXPENSE APPROVAL REGISTER
Packet: APPKT00011 - WARRANTS 02-10-2015
Report Summary
Fund Summary
Fund
110 - GENERAL FUND
501 - WATER UTILITY M & O FUND
504 - USDA WATER PROJECT FUND
601 - CLMSD UTILITY M & O FUND
801 - OPEB AGENCY FUND
Grand Total:
Expense Amount
52,294.61
258.50
190,912.53
258.50
3,331.12
247,055.26
Account Summary
Account Number
110-0000-209001
110-0000-209003
110-1052-921001
110-1052-930000
110-2010-911000
110-3020-921000
110-3030-930000
110-3040-930000
501-1052-921001
504-3060-930000
504-3060-990000
601-1052-921001
801-0000-916000
Account Name
OPERATING ENGINEERS I
REMIF BENEFITS PAYABLE
INTERNET SERVICES
PROFESSIONAL/CONTRAC
FRINGE BENEFITS
TELEPHONE
INTERNET SERVICES
LAND, STRUCTURES & IM
INTERNET SERVICES
RETIREE HEALTH INSURA
Grand Total:
Expense Amount
2,040.00
4,585.63
517.00
2,890.00
8,158.00
152.80
765.00
33,186.18
258.50
17,980.75
172,931.78
258.50
3,331.12
247,055.26
Project Account Summary

Project Account Key
**None**
Grand Total:
2/10/2015 4:33:28 PM
Expense Amount
247,055.26
247,055.26
Page 2 of 2
Check Register
Packet: APPKT00015 - 02-20-2015 WARRANTS
Lakeport, CA
By Check Number
Vendor Number
Vendor Name
Bank Code: AP BANK-AP BANK
1644
AG UNLIMITED
00371
ALPHA ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES
1632
ANGELINA'S BAKERY
00109
ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES
2351
AT&T
**Void**
00321
B & B INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY, INC.
3030
BLUE TARP FINANCIAL
2689
BRYAN TAVARES
1599
CABELA'S INC
2690
CANON SOLUTIONS AMERICA
1607
CARLTON TIRE
2331
CARTEGRAPH SYSTEMS, INC.
2778
COLANTUANO, HIGHSMITH &
00130
COUNTY OF LAKE-ANIMAL CONTROL
**Void**
**Void**
**Void**
**Void**
**Void**
**Void**
**Void**
**Void**
**Void**
**Void**
**Void**
**Void**
**Void**
**Void**
**Void**
**Void**
**Void**
**Void**
**Void**
**Void**
**Void**
**Void**
**Void**
**Void**
**Void**
**Void**
**Void**
**Void**
**Void**
**Void**
**Void**
**Void**
**Void**
**Void**
**Void**
**Void**
**Void**
**Void**
**Void**
2/25/2015 6:41:25 PM
Payment Date
Payment Type
02/20/2015
02/20/2015
02/20/2015
02/20/2015
02/20/2015
02/20/2015
02/20/2015
02/20/2015
02/20/2015
02/20/2015
02/20/2015
02/20/2015
02/20/2015
02/20/2015
02/20/2015
02/20/2015
02/20/2015
02/20/2015
02/20/2015
02/20/2015
02/20/2015
02/20/2015
02/20/2015
02/20/2015
02/20/2015
02/20/2015
02/20/2015
02/20/2015
02/20/2015
02/20/2015
02/20/2015
02/20/2015
02/20/2015
02/20/2015
02/20/2015
02/20/2015
02/20/2015
02/20/2015
02/20/2015
02/20/2015
02/20/2015
02/20/2015
02/20/2015
02/20/2015
02/20/2015
02/20/2015
02/20/2015
02/20/2015
02/20/2015
02/20/2015
02/20/2015
02/20/2015
02/20/2015
02/20/2015
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Discount Amount
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Payment Amount Number

1,814.02
1,498.00
60.00
182.98
1,309.85
0.00
1,283.14
2,302.93
180.00
158.94
210.57
244.03
3,090.63
11,858.30
891.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
46579
46580
46581
46582
46583
46584
46585
46586
46587
46588
46589
46590
46591
46592
46593
46594
46595
46596
46597
46598
46599
46600
46601
46602
46603
46604
46605
46606
46607
46608
46609
46610
46611
46612
46613
46614
46615
46616
46617
46618
46619
46620
46621
46622
46623
46624
46625
46626
46627
46628
46629
46630
46631
46632
Page 1 of 4
Check Register
Vendor Number
00128
1812
2547
2371
0331
1127
00148
1044
3028
2543
1982
2421
2671
2805
1705
2015
2044
3029
2057
2425
00364
00183
00175
2542
2208
00187
1026
2067
2054
00387
00113
2627
1053
1116
00217
2252
1130
00286
3031
1837
00276
1108
2383
00400
2743
2/25/2015 6:41:25 PM
Packet: APPKT00015-02-20-2015 WARRANTS

Vendor Name
**Void**
**Void**
**Void**
**Void**
**Void**
**Void**
**Void**
**Void**
**Void**
**Void**
**Void**
**Void**
**Void**
**Void**
**Void**
**Void**
COUNTY OF LAKE-PUBLIC WORKS
COUNTY OF LAKE-REG OF VOTERS
CSMFO
DE NOVO PLANNING GROUP
DEEP VALLEY SECURITY
DEPT OF JUSTICE
EDD
EAST BAY TRUCK CENTER
EDUCATION & TRAINING SERVICES
ENTERPRISE RENT-A-CAR
EUREKA OXYGEN COMPANY
FERRELLGAS
GLADWELL GOVERNMENTAL SERVICES
GOV'T STAFFING SERVICES, INC.
HAGAN HEATING & COOLING
HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES
IMAGE SALES, INC.
INSTRUMENT TECHNOLOGY CORP
JAKE TESCHNER
KNIFE RIVER CONSTRUCTION
LAKE COUNTY ELECTRIC SUPPLY
LAKE COUNTY RECORD BEE
LAKEPORT TIRE & AUTO SERVICE
MENDO LAKE STAFFING, INC.
MENDO MILL & LUMBER CO.
NAPA AUTO - LAKE PARTS
NORTHERN SAFETY COMPANY
OFFICE DEPOT
PMC
PACE SUPPLY #03391-00
PAK 'N MAIL
PEOPLE SERVICES, INC.
PETERSON
PG&E VO248104
PLAZA PAINT & SUPPLIES
POLESTAR COMPUTERS
RAINBOW AGRICULTURAL SERVICES
ROBERTSON & ASSOCIATES, CPA'S
ROGER WHEELER LANDSCAPING
ROYAL AUTOMOTIVE CENTER
SEARS COMMERCIAL ONE
SHRED-IT CONCORD
SIERRA CHEMICAL COMPANY
SONSRAY MACHINERY
Payment Date
02/20/2015
02/20/2015
02/20/2015
02/20/2015
02/20/2015
02/20/2015
02/20/2015
02/20/2015
02/20/2015
02/20/2015
02/20/2015
02/20/2015
02/20/2015
02/20/2015
02/20/2015
02/25/2015
02/25/2015
02/25/2015
02/25/2015
02/25/2015
02/25/2015
02/25/2015
02/25/2015
02/25/2015
02/25/2015
02/25/2015
02/25/2015
02/25/2015
02/25/2015
02/25/2015
02/25/2015
02/25/2015
02/25/2015
02/25/2015
02/25/2015
02/25/2015
02/25/2015
02/25/2015
02/25/2015
02/25/2015
02/25/2015
02/25/2015
02/25/2015
02/25/2015
02/25/2015
02/25/2015
02/25/2015
02/25/2015
02/25/2015
02/25/2015
02/25/2015
02/25/2015
02/25/2015
02/25/2015
02/25/2015
02/25/2015
02/25/2015
02/25/2015
02/25/2015
02/25/2015
02/25/2015
Payment Type
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Discount Amount
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Payment Amount
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
6.00
2,609.36
25.00
4,670.00
165.90
102.00
1,781.00
107.34
549.00
38.11
235.94
272.58
750.00
935.00
503.00
1,464.51
45.37
4,742.28
204.00
3,765.51
687.60
1,152.27
551.65
1,229.95
2,573.15
622.07
106.30
30.59
847.50
63,830.66
363.18
187.35
180.00
157.21
1,001.01
29.14
1,235.00
1,377.84
500.00
225.00
8.00
386.99
163.65
594.92
812.25
Number
46633
46634
46635
46636
46637
46638
46639
46640
46641
46642
46643
46644
46645
46646
46647
46648
46649
46650
46651
46652
46653
46654
46655
46656
46657
46658
46659
46660
46661
46662
46663
46664
46665
46666
46667
46668
46669
46670
46671
46672
46673
46674
46675
46676
46677
46678
46679
46680
46681
46682
46683
46684
46685
46686
46687
46688
46689
46690
46691
46692
46693
Page 2 of 4
Check Register
Vendor Number
2661
1177
2119
00368
2302
2774
2109
00164
1675

Vendor Name
STAPLES CONTRACT & COMMERCIAL
TOM CARLTON
TRI-CITIES ANSWERING SERVICE
UKIAH PAPER SUPPLY, INC.
UNIVAR USA INC.
UTILITIES SAFETY SERVICES
VERIZON WIRELESS
WESTGATE PETROLEUM CO., INC.
WQI
Payment Date
02/25/2015
02/25/2015
02/25/2015
02/25/2015
02/25/2015
02/25/2015
02/25/2015
02/25/2015
02/25/2015
Payment Type
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Discount Amount
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Payment Amount
768.40
75.00
167.16
155.13
4,279.45
1,492.50
213.19
1,647.26
500.00
Number
46694
46695
46696
46697
46698
46699
46700
46701
46702
Bank Code AP BANK Summary

Payment Type
Regular Checks
Manual Checks
Voided Checks
Bank Drafts
EFT's
2/25/2015 6:41:25 PM
Payable
Count
135
0
0
0
0
135
Payment
Count
68
0
56
0
0
124
Discount
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Payment
136,208.16
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
136,208.16
Page 3 of 4
Check Register
Fund Summary
2/25/2015 6:41:25 PM
Fund
Name
Period
Amount
998
POOLED CASH
2/2015
136,208.16
136,208.16
Page 4 of 4
Warrants 02-25-15
By Fund
Lakeport, CA
Payment Dates 2/25/2015 - 2/25/2015

Vendor Name
Post Date
Description (Item)
Fund: 110 - GENERAL FUND

Department: 1010 - CITY COUNCIL
ENTERPRISE RENT-A-CAR
99983M
COUNTY OF LAKE-REG OF VOTE 110414
01/31/2015
02/04/2015
CAR RENTAL/SCHEEL
110-1010-933000
NOV 4 2014 ELECTION EXPENSES 110-1010-934000
Department 1010 - CITY COUNCIL Total:
38.11
2,609.36
2,647.47
Department: 1020 - ADMINISTRATION

STAPLES CONTRACT & COMME 7001556328
GLADWELL GOVERNMENTAL SE 3110
IMAGE SALES, INC.
40788
SHRED-IT CONCORD
9403830844
SHRED-IT CONCORD
9404770439
SHRED-IT CONCORD
9404921452
LKPT0115
EDD
L1909070656
12/15/2014
12/17/2014
12/18/2014
12/18/2014
01/19/2015
02/03/2015
07/01/2014
02/06/2015
02/06/2015
02/03/2015
01/28/2015
OFFICE SUPPLIES
110-1020-924000
OFFICE SUPPLIES
110-1020-924000
OFFICE SUPPLIES
110-1020-924000
OFFICE SUPPLIES
110-1020-928000
RECORDS RETENTION PROGRAM 110-1020-930000
ID BADGE/STRUGNELL
110-1020-930000
SHREDDING SVC/CH
110-1020-930000
SHREDDING SVC/CH
110-1020-930000
SHREDDING SVC/CH
110-1020-930000
CONF SPACE TRAINING
110-1020-930000
UNEMPLOYMENT BENEFIT CHA 110-1020-932000
Department 1020 - ADMINISTRATION Total:
26.65
49.87
41.95
161.99
750.00
17.15
41.94
40.82
40.07
179.10
235.66
1,585.20
Department: 1041 - FINANCE

OFFICE DEPOT
752819490001
ROBERTSON & ASSOCIATES, CP 53911
57699
CSMFO
8987
01/29/2015
01/31/2015
01/09/2015
02/06/2015
FINANCE OFFICE SUPPLIES

TOT AUDIT
TEMP STAFF
CPE CERT WEBINAR
110-1041-924000
110-1041-930000
110-1041-930000
110-1041-933000
Department 1041 - FINANCE Total:
10.20
500.00
108.79
7.00
625.99
Department: 1050 - COMMUNITY DEV: PLANNING

0000828694
0000837332
0000837332
DE NOVO PLANNING GROUP
1517
11/30/2014
12/31/2014
12/31/2014
01/16/2015
CLASSIFIED ADS/RB16310 & RB 110-1050-922000

MISC SUPPLIES
110-1050-922000
MISC SUPPLIES
110-1050-922000
DRAFT/SCREENCHECK ADDEND 110-1050-930000
Department 1050 - COMMUNITY DEV: PLANNING Total:
230.73
121.77
108.98
4,670.00
5,131.48
Department: 1051 - COMMUNITY DEV: BUILDING

TOM CARLTON
INV0000072
02/10/2015
ICC CERTIFICATION REIMB

110-1051-931000
Department 1051 - COMMUNITY DEV: BUILDING Total:
75.00
75.00
Department: 1052 - ENGINEERING & INFORMATION TECH

POLESTAR COMPUTERS
60648
COUNTY OF LAKE-PUBLIC WOR DEC/JAN 2015
GOV'T STAFFING SERVICES, INC. 125319
EDD
L1909070656
02/02/2015
02/03/2015
02/13/2015
01/28/2015
LABOR CONTRACT
110-1052-921001
MAP CHARGES
110-1052-928000
TEMP STAFF/AKABA
110-1052-930000
Department 1052 - ENGINEERING & INFORMATION TECH Total:
411.66
6.00
935.00
270.00
1,622.66
Department: 2010 - POLICE

PG&E VO248104
INV0000070
PG&E VO248104
INV0000071
VERIZON WIRELESS
9739533903
WESTGATE PETROLEUM CO., IN 100082
LAKEPORT TIRE & AUTO SERVICE 272066
IMAGE SALES, INC.
40804
SHRED-IT CONCORD
9404843410
DEPT OF JUSTICE
081553
DEPT OF JUSTICE
083954
HAGAN HEATING & COOLING
3830
EDD
L1909070656
01/23/2015
01/23/2015
01/25/2015
01/23/2015
01/12/2015
02/04/2015
01/23/2015
02/04/2015
02/05/2015
01/28/2015
01/28/2015
ELECTRICITY
110-2010-920000
ELECTRICITY
110-2010-920000
CELL PHONE
110-2010-921000
CARDLOCK FUEL/PD
110-2010-925000
TIRES
110-2010-926000
ID BADGE/SOBIERAJ & BASO
110-2010-928000
SHREDDING SVC/PD
110-2010-929000
FINGERPRINTS
110-2010-930000
BA ANALYSIS
110-2010-930000
HEATING SYSTEM REPAIRS
110-2010-930000
Department 2010 - POLICE Total:
214.92
212.55
123.62
823.87
551.65
28.22
40.82
32.00
70.00
503.00
174.00
2,774.65
2/25/2015 2:01:29 PM
Payable Number
Account Number
Amount
Page 1 of 7
Warrants 02-25-15
Vendor Name
Payment Dates: 2/25/2015 - 2/25/2015

Post Date
Description (Item)
Department: 3020 - ROADS AND INFRASTRUCTURE

PG&E VO248104
INV0000066
013115
013115
013115
013115
013115
013115
PETERSON
PC060122228
013115
013115
ROYAL AUTOMOTIVE CENTER
7107
SONSRAY MACHINERY
P01604-04
013115
013115
PLAZA PAINT & SUPPLIES
L0005479
15153
TRI-CITIES ANSWERING SERVICE 37533
57699
KNIFE RIVER CONSTRUCTION
156386
01/25/2015
12/02/2014
12/18/2014
12/18/2014
02/05/2015
01/20/2015
01/31/2015
01/31/2015
01/31/2015
01/31/2015
01/31/2015
01/31/2015
01/24/2015
01/31/2015
01/31/2015
02/03/2015
11/12/2014
01/31/2015
01/31/2015
01/21/2015
01/31/2015
02/01/2015
01/09/2015
02/09/2015
ELECTRICITY
110-3020-920001
OFFICE SUPPLIES
110-3020-924000
OFFICE SUPPLIES
110-3020-924000
OFFICE SUPPLIES
110-3020-924000
OFFICE SUPPLIES
110-3020-924000
FUEL/CORP YARD
110-3020-925000
MISC SUPPLIES
110-3020-926000
MISC SUPPLIES
110-3020-926000
MISC SUPPLIES
110-3020-926000
MISC SUPPLIES
110-3020-926000
MISC SUPPLIES
110-3020-926000
MISC SUPPLIES
110-3020-926000
MISC PARTS
110-3020-926000
MISC SUPPLIES
110-3020-927000
MISC SUPPLIES
110-3020-927000
FLAT REPAIR
110-3020-927000
MISC PARTS
110-3020-927000
MISC SUPPLIES
110-3020-928000
MISC SUPPLIES
110-3020-928000
CURB PAINT
110-3020-928000
YARD JANITORIAL SVC/JAN 2015 110-3020-930000
YARD ANSWERING SVC/FEB 20 110-3020-930000
TEMP STAFF
110-3020-930000
WET PATCH
110-3020-990308
Department 3020 - ROADS AND INFRASTRUCTURE Total:
241.94
70.78
20.16
31.64
4.37
226.92
-34.83
70.70
66.83
-26.23
211.45
61.06
157.21
61.75
17.99
8.00
812.25
191.36
73.08
29.14
59.99
55.71
542.16
3,765.51
6,718.94
Department: 3030 - PARKS, BUILDINGS & GROUNDS

FERRELLGAS
1086057822
013115
013115
NORTHERN SAFETY COMPANY 901278678
013115
013115
013115
013115
013115
013115
013115
013115
013115
013115
013115
013115
013115
UKIAH PAPER SUPPLY, INC.
438217
L63238
HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 012815
013115
013115
013115
RAINBOW AGRICULTURAL SERV 2893393-00
LAKE COUNTY ELECTRIC SUPPLY 5057413
SEARS COMMERCIAL ONE
T665070
409641
01/28/2015
01/20/2015
01/31/2015
01/31/2015
02/05/2015
01/31/2015
01/31/2015
01/31/2015
01/31/2015
01/31/2015
01/31/2015
01/31/2015
01/31/2015
01/31/2015
01/31/2015
01/31/2015
01/31/2015
01/31/2015
02/12/2015
01/27/2015
01/28/2015
01/31/2015
01/31/2015
01/31/2015
01/29/2015
02/11/2015
01/30/2015
02/04/2015
02/11/2015
02/05/2015
02/06/2015
02/05/2015
01/05/2015
PROPANE
FUEL/CORP YARD
MISC SUPPLIES
MISC SUPPLIES
AMBER FLASHING 12V DC
MISC SUPPLIES
MISC SUPPLIES
MISC SUPPLIES
MISC SUPPLIES
MISC SUPPLIES
MISC SUPPLIES
MISC SUPPLIES
MISC SUPPLIES
MISC SUPPLIES
MISC SUPPLIES
MISC SUPPLIES
MISC SUPPLIES
MISC SUPPLIES
RESPIRATOR MASKS
MISC SUPPLIES
MISC SUPPLIES/TOOLS
MISC SUPPLIES
MISC SUPPLIES
MISC SUPPLIES
MISC SUPPLIES
CREDIT
MISC SUPPLIES
MISC SUPPLIES
MISC SUPPLIES
OFFICE SUPPLIES
OFFICE SUPPLIES
COMPRESSOR
EXTINGUISHER SERVICE
124.84
142.62
13.23
96.89
106.30
30.06
118.88
21.59
-282.96
17.18
104.91
16.65
471.60
23.84
-30.06
28.96
5.93
21.46
155.13
143.94
1,464.51
557.99
1,027.33
96.02
1,605.94
-584.97
392.09
199.61
80.63
92.31
49.13
386.99
92.00
2/25/2015 2:01:29 PM
Payable Number
Account Number
110-3030-920000
110-3030-925000
110-3030-926000
110-3030-927000
110-3030-927000
110-3030-928000
110-3030-928000
110-3030-928000
110-3030-928000
110-3030-928000
110-3030-928000
110-3030-928000
110-3030-928000
110-3030-928000
110-3030-928000
110-3030-928000
110-3030-928000
110-3030-928000
110-3030-928000
110-3030-928000
110-3030-928014
110-3030-928014
110-3030-928014
110-3030-928014
110-3030-928014
110-3030-928014
110-3030-928014
110-3030-928014
110-3030-928014
110-3030-928014
110-3030-928014
110-3030-928014
110-3030-930000
Amount
Page 2 of 7
Warrants 02-25-15
Vendor Name
Payment Dates: 2/25/2015 - 2/25/2015

Payable Number
Post Date
Description (Item)
ROGER WHEELER LANDSCAPING 6398
01/27/2015
MONTHLY MAINT/JAN 2015

110-3030-930000
Department 3030 - PARKS, BUILDINGS & GROUNDS Total:
Department: 3050 - WESTSHORE POOL

PG&E VO248104
INV0000067
01/26/2015
ELECTRICITY
Fund: 210 - ECON RLF RE-USE FUND

Department: 1054 - ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM
0000828694
0000837332
Fund: 414 - STORM DRAINAGE FUND

Department: 3020 - ROADS AND INFRASTRUCTURE
23595
11/30/2014
12/31/2014
01/08/2015
Account Number
Amount
225.00
7,015.57
110-3050-920000
Department 3050 - WESTSHORE POOL Total:
237.42
237.42
Fund 110 - GENERAL FUND Total:
28,434.38
CLASSIFIED ADS/RB16310 & RB 210-1054-922000

MISC SUPPLIES
210-1054-922000
Department 1054 - ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM Total:
121.77
99.36
221.13
Fund 210 - ECON RLF RE-USE FUND Total:
221.13
STORM DRAIN PROJECT

414-3020-930000
Department 3020 - ROADS AND INFRASTRUCTURE Total:
850.00
850.00
Fund 414 - STORM DRAINAGE FUND Total:
850.00
Fund: 501 - WATER UTILITY M & O FUND

LKPT0115
EDD
L1909070656
02/03/2015
01/28/2015
CONF SPACE TRAINING

501-1020-930000
656.70
235.67
892.37

OFFICE DEPOT
752819490001
57699
CSMFO
8987
01/29/2015
01/09/2015
02/06/2015

TEMP STAFF
CPE CERT WEBINAR
501-1041-924000
501-1041-930000
501-1041-933000
10.20
108.78
6.00
124.98

POLESTAR COMPUTERS
60648
EDD
L1909070656
02/02/2015
01/28/2015
LABOR CONTRACT
501-1052-921001
411.66
315.00
726.66
Department: 3060 - WATER MAINTENANCE & OPERATIONS

FERRELLGAS
1086057822
PG&E VO248104
INV0000068
0000837332
PAK 'N MAIL
15576
013115
013115
PACE SUPPLY #03391-00
022641066
UNIVAR USA INC.
SJ666002
15153
57699
WQI
TAVARES
EDUCATION & TRAINING SERVI TESCHNER
01/28/2015
01/23/2015
12/31/2014
02/04/2015
12/02/2014
12/18/2014
12/18/2014
02/05/2015
01/20/2015
01/31/2015
02/11/2015
01/31/2015
01/29/2015
02/04/2015
01/29/2015
01/31/2015
02/01/2015
01/09/2015
02/11/2015
02/19/2015
PROPANE
501-3060-920000
ELECTRICITY
501-3060-920000
MISC SUPPLIES
501-3060-922000
UT SUPT EMPLOYMENT BROCH 501-3060-922000
OFFICE SUPPLIES
501-3060-924000
OFFICE SUPPLIES
501-3060-924000
OFFICE SUPPLIES
501-3060-924000
OFFICE SUPPLIES
501-3060-924000
FUEL/CORP YARD
501-3060-925000
MISC SUPPLIES
501-3060-926000
MISC SUPPLIES
501-3060-927000
MISC SUPPLIES
501-3060-928000
REPAIR CLAMPS
501-3060-928000
BOOTS/STRUGNELL & MUCK B 501-3060-928000
CAUSTIC SODA
501-3060-928005
TEMP STAFF
501-3060-930000
DISTRIBUTION REVIEW CLASS
501-3060-933000
LEADERSHIP TRAINING/TESCHN 501-3060-933000
Department 3060 - WATER MAINTENANCE & OPERATIONS Total:
73.87
64.92
234.83
93.68
70.76
20.15
14.48
4.38
259.14
22.61
15.27
33.34
363.18
356.87
4,279.45
59.99
55.71
180.72
250.00
549.00
7,002.35
Fund 501 - WATER UTILITY M & O FUND Total:
8,746.36
2/25/2015 2:01:29 PM
Page 3 of 7
Warrants 02-25-15
Vendor Name
Payment Dates: 2/25/2015 - 2/25/2015

Payable Number
Post Date
Fund: 504 - USDA WATER PROJECT FUND

Department: 3060 - WATER MAINTENANCE & OPERATIONS
23754
02/11/2015
Description (Item)
Account Number
Amount
WATER SYSTEM PROJECGT

504-3060-930000
Department 3060 - WATER MAINTENANCE & OPERATIONS Total:
33,725.16
33,725.16
Fund 504 - USDA WATER PROJECT FUND Total:
33,725.16
Fund: 601 - CLMSD UTILITY M & O FUND

LKPT0115
EDD
L1909070656
02/03/2015
01/28/2015
CONF SPACE TRAINING

601-1020-930000
656.70
235.67
892.37

OFFICE DEPOT
752819490001
57699
CSMFO
8987
01/29/2015
01/09/2015
02/06/2015

TEMP STAFF
CPE CERT WEBINAR
601-1041-924000
601-1041-930000
601-1041-933000
10.19
108.78
6.00
124.97

POLESTAR COMPUTERS
60648
EDD
L1909070656
02/02/2015
01/28/2015
LABOR CONTRACT
601-1052-921001
411.68
315.00
726.68
Department: 3070 - CLMSD MAINTENANCE & OPERATIONS

FERRELLGAS
1086057822
PG&E VO248104
INV0000069
VERIZON WIRELESS
9739513928
0000837332
PAK 'N MAIL
15576
013115
013115
EAST BAY TRUCK CENTER
801450
013115
013115
013115
013115
INSTRUMENT TECHNOLOGY CO 11177
10005328
10017167
15153
271191
272652
57699
WQI
TAVARES
01/28/2015
01/23/2015
01/25/2015
12/31/2014
02/04/2015
12/02/2014
12/18/2014
12/18/2014
02/05/2015
01/20/2015
01/31/2015
01/31/2015
11/20/2014
01/31/2015
01/31/2015
01/31/2015
01/31/2015
01/30/2015
12/31/2014
01/15/2015
01/31/2015
01/01/2015
02/01/2015
02/01/2015
01/09/2015
02/11/2015
PROPANE
601-3070-920000
ELECTRICITY
601-3070-920000
CELL PHONE
601-3070-921000
MISC SUPPLIES
601-3070-922000
UT SUPT EMPLOYMENT BROCH 601-3070-922000
OFFICE SUPPLIES
601-3070-924000
OFFICE SUPPLIES
601-3070-924000
OFFICE SUPPLIES
601-3070-924000
OFFICE SUPPLIES
601-3070-924000
FUEL/CORP YARD
601-3070-925000
MISC SUPPLIES
601-3070-926000
MISC SUPPLIES
601-3070-926000
DOOR HANDLE
601-3070-926000
MISC SUPPLIES
601-3070-928000
MISC SUPPLIES
601-3070-928000
MISC SUPPLIES
601-3070-928000
MISC SUPPLIES
601-3070-928000
CONFIG B007 KIT
601-3070-928000
DEPOSIT REFUND
601-3070-928005
CHLORINE
601-3070-928005
STATION MONITORING/JAN 20 601-3070-930000
STATION MONITORING/FEB 20 601-3070-930000
TEMP STAFF
601-3070-930000
DISTRIBUTION REVIEW CLASS
601-3070-933000
Department 3070 - CLMSD MAINTENANCE & OPERATIONS Total:
73.87
29.26
89.57
234.83
93.67
70.76
20.16
14.48
4.38
194.71
16.42
22.61
107.34
10.71
15.39
9.34
32.14
4,742.28
-1,000.00
1,594.92
60.02
82.95
82.95
55.74
180.72
250.00
7,089.22
Fund 601 - CLMSD UTILITY M & O FUND Total:
8,833.24
WASTEWATER SYSTEM PROJ

604-3070-930000
Department 3070 - CLMSD MAINTENANCE & OPERATIONS Total:
29,255.50
29,255.50
Fund 604 - USDA SEWER PROJECT FUND Total:
29,255.50
Fund: 604 - USDA SEWER PROJECT FUND

Department: 3070 - CLMSD MAINTENANCE & OPERATIONS
23755
2/25/2015 2:01:29 PM
02/11/2015
Page 4 of 7
Warrants 02-25-15
Vendor Name
Payment Dates: 2/25/2015 - 2/25/2015

Payable Number
Fund: 702 - SPECIAL DEPOSIT FUND

Department: 0000 - NON-DEPARTMENTAL
PMC
42135
Fund: 705 - RDA OBLIGATION RETIREMENT FUND

CSMFO
8987
2/25/2015 2:01:29 PM
Post Date
Description (Item)
01/16/2015
SAFEWAY FUELING CENTET

702-0000-222018
Department 0000 - NON-DEPARTMENTAL Total:
847.50
847.50
Fund 702 - SPECIAL DEPOSIT FUND Total:
847.50
705-1041-933000
6.00
6.00
Fund 705 - RDA OBLIGATION RETIREMENT FUND Total:
6.00
Grand Total:
110,919.27
02/06/2015
CPE CERT WEBINAR
Account Number
Amount
Page 5 of 7
Warrants 02-25-15
Payment Dates: 2/25/2015 - 2/25/2015
Report Summary
Fund Summary
Fund
110 - GENERAL FUND
210 - ECON RLF RE-USE FUND
414 - STORM DRAINAGE FUND
501 - WATER UTILITY M & O FUND
504 - USDA WATER PROJECT FUND
601 - CLMSD UTILITY M & O FUND
604 - USDA SEWER PROJECT FUND
702 - SPECIAL DEPOSIT FUND
705 - RDA OBLIGATION RETIREMENT FUND
Grand Total:
Payment Amount
28,434.38
221.13
850.00
8,746.36
33,725.16
8,833.24
29,255.50
847.50
6.00
110,919.27
Account Summary
Account Number
110-1010-933000
110-1010-934000
110-1020-924000
110-1020-928000
110-1020-930000
110-1020-932000
110-1041-924000
110-1041-930000
110-1041-933000
110-1050-922000
110-1050-930000
110-1051-931000
110-1052-921001
110-1052-928000
110-1052-930000
110-1052-932000
110-2010-920000
110-2010-921000
110-2010-925000
110-2010-926000
110-2010-928000
110-2010-929000
110-2010-930000
110-2010-932000
110-3020-920001
110-3020-924000
110-3020-925000
110-3020-926000
110-3020-927000
110-3020-928000
110-3020-930000
110-3020-990308
110-3030-920000
110-3030-925000
110-3030-926000
110-3030-927000
110-3030-928000
110-3030-928014
110-3030-930000
110-3050-920000
210-1054-922000
414-3020-930000
501-1020-930000
501-1020-932000
2/25/2015 2:01:29 PM
Account Name
TRAVEL AND TRAINING
ELECTIONS
OFFICE SUPPLIES
SPECIAL DEPARTMENTAL
INSURANCE AND SURETY
OFFICE SUPPLIES
TRAVEL AND TRAINING
ADVERTISING & PUBLIC
DUES AND SUBSCRIPTIONS
INTERNET SERVICES
ELECTRICITY AND PROPA
TELEPHONE
GASOLINE AND OIL
VEHICLE MAINTENANCE
EQUIPMENT RENTS AND
STREET LIGHTING
OFFICE SUPPLIES
GASOLINE AND OIL
VEHICLE MAINTENANCE
EQUIPMENT MAINTENAN
ROAD PROJECTS
GASOLINE AND OIL
VEHICLE MAINTENANCE
EQUIPMENT MAINTENAN
LOSS RECOVERY
Payment Amount
38.11
2,609.36
118.47
161.99
1,069.08
235.66
10.20
608.79
7.00
461.48
4,670.00
75.00
411.66
6.00
935.00
270.00
427.47
123.62
823.87
551.65
28.22
40.82
605.00
174.00
241.94
126.95
226.92
506.19
899.99
293.58
657.86
3,765.51
124.84
142.62
13.23
203.19
847.11
5,367.58
317.00
237.42
221.13
850.00
656.70
235.67
Page 6 of 7
Warrants 02-25-15
Payment Dates: 2/25/2015 - 2/25/2015
Account Summary
Account Number
501-1041-924000
501-1041-930000
501-1041-933000
501-1052-921001
501-1052-932000
501-3060-920000
501-3060-922000
501-3060-924000
501-3060-925000
501-3060-926000
501-3060-927000
501-3060-928000
501-3060-928005
501-3060-930000
501-3060-933000
504-3060-930000
601-1020-930000
601-1020-932000
601-1041-924000
601-1041-930000
601-1041-933000
601-1052-921001
601-1052-932000
601-3070-920000
601-3070-921000
601-3070-922000
601-3070-924000
601-3070-925000
601-3070-926000
601-3070-928000
601-3070-928005
601-3070-930000
601-3070-933000
604-3070-930000
702-0000-222018
705-1041-933000
Account Name
OFFICE SUPPLIES
TRAVEL AND TRAINING
INTERNET SERVICES
OFFICE SUPPLIES
GASOLINE AND OIL
VEHICLE MAINTENANCE
EQUIPMENT MAINTENAN
TREATMENT CHEMICALS
TRAVEL AND TRAINING
OFFICE SUPPLIES
TRAVEL AND TRAINING
INTERNET SERVICES
TELEPHONE
OFFICE SUPPLIES
GASOLINE AND OIL
VEHICLE MAINTENANCE
TREATMENT CHEMICALS
TRAVEL AND TRAINING
SAFEWAY PMC
TRAVEL AND TRAINING
Grand Total:
Payment Amount
10.20
108.78
6.00
411.66
315.00
138.79
328.51
109.77
259.14
22.61
15.27
753.39
4,279.45
296.42
799.00
33,725.16
656.70
235.67
10.19
108.78
6.00
411.68
315.00
103.13
89.57
328.50
109.78
194.71
146.37
4,809.86
594.92
462.38
250.00
29,255.50
847.50
6.00
110,919.27
Project Account Summary

Project Account Key
**None**
Grand Total:
2/25/2015 2:01:29 PM
Payment Amount
110,919.27
110,919.27
Page 7 of 7
MINUTES
LAKEPORT CITY COUNCIL AND THE BOARD

OF DIRECTORS OF THE CITY OF LAKEPORT MUNICIPAL SEWER DISTRICT
REGULAR MEETING
February 17, 2015
CLOSED SESSION:
The meeting was called to order and adjourned to a closed session at 5:30 p.m.
Conference with Legal Counsel; Existing Litigation (Gov. Code 54956.9(d)(1))
Name of Case: City of Lakeport v. County of Lake et al.
Names of Parties: Plaintiff: City of Lakeport; Defendants: County of Lake, Office of
the Sheriff for the County of Lake, Sheriff Francisco Rivero
Case No.: SCUK CGD-1362378 (Mendocino Super. Ct.)
REPORT OUT OF CLOSED SESSION:
The meeting reconvened into open session. Mayor Pro Tem Mattina announced
that there was no reportable action.
I.
CALL TO ORDER & ROLL CALL:
Mayor Pro Tem Mattina called the regular meeting of the City Council of the City
of Lakeport to order at 6:00 p.m. with Council Members Kenneth Parlet, Mireya
Turner and Marc Spillman present. Mayor Martin Scheel was absent.
II.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE:
The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Chief Rasmussen
III.
ACCEPTANCE OF AGENDA:
A motion was made by Council Member Parlet, seconded by Council Member

Spillman, and carried by voice vote, with Mayor Scheel absent, to accept the
agenda as posted.
Urgency Items:
IV.
There were no urgency items.
CONSENT AGENDA:
A.
Ordinances:
Waive reading except by title, of any ordinances under consideration at this

meeting for either introduction or passage per Government Code Section 36934.
B.
Warrants:
Approve warrant registers from January 6, 2015.
C.
Minutes:
Approve minutes of the regular City Council meeting of February 3, 2015.
D.
Approve Application 2015-001 for Lake Family Resource Center for their annual
Child Festival in the Park on Saturday, April 11 2015, from 8:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m.
with requested street closures on Park Street.
E.
Approve Application 2015-004 for the Clearlake Club for the Care for Scarlett
Michelle fundraiser in in the alley behind the Club on Saturday, February 28, 2015,
from 9:00 a.m. to 5:30 p.m.
Vote on Consent Agenda
Council Member Turner noted a typo on Consent Agenda item D. The

organizations name is the Lake Family Resource Center.
Turner, and carried by voice vote, with Mayor Scheel absent, to approve the
Consent Agenda with the typo amended.
V.
VI.
PUBLIC PRESENTATIONS/REQUESTS:
A.
Citizen Input:
There was no Citizen Input.
B.
Introductions of New Employees
Public Works Director Mark Brannigan introduced new Public Works employees
Jay Strugnell and Steven Rodrigues.
PUBLIC HEARING:
A.
Martin Street Abandonment
Temporary City Engineer Mark Akaba gave a report regarding the proposed
vacation of a portion of the right of way on Martin Street.
The public hearing was opened at 6:09 p.m. There was no public comment, and
the hearing was closed at 6:10 p.m.
Spillman, and carried by voice vote, with Mayor Scheel absent, to adopt the
proposed resolution ordering the vacation of a portion of right of way on Martin
Street between Main Street and Forbes Street.
B.
General Plan Amendment
Special Projects Coordinator Richard Knoll gave a report regarding the proposed
General Plan Amendment.
The public hearing was opened at 6:17 p.m. There was no public comment, and
the hearing was closed at 6:18 p.m.
Council Member Turner requested a change to the language in the Urban
Boundary Element page 3-1 of the strikethrough version from City services will
be extended to say may be extended in the case of annexation.
A motion was made by Council Member Spillman, seconded by Council Member
Turner, and carried by voice vote, with Mayor Scheel absent, to adopt the
proposed resolution that includes approval of the 2014 Addendum to the City of
Lakeport General Plan as prepared by De Novo Planning Group (dated October 24,
2014) on behalf of the City of Lakeport and also includes the Lakeport General
Plan Text and Map Amendments set forth in Attachment A, as amended.
VII.
COUNCIL BUSINESS:
A.
Finance Director
1. Mid-Year Budget Review
Finance Director Buffalo gave a report regarding the Citys financial position at
mid-fiscal year, as well as requests for budget adjustments.
A motion was made by Council Member Turner, seconded by Council Member
Spillman, and carried by voice vote, with Mayor Scheel absent, to approve budget
amendment as recommended by staff.
B.
Public Works Director

1. USDA Budget Amendment and
Project Update
Public Works Director Brannigan presented a report requesting a USDA budget

amendment, presented a project update. Tom Warnock, Engineer with Pace
Engineering and Paul Ashby of Adams Ashby were available for questions.
Turner, and carried by voice vote, with Mayor Scheel absent, to authorize staff to
request additional funds and grants from USDA, not to exceed $1.6 million needed
to complete the Water and Wastewater Projects, and authorize the City Manager
to sign Amendment # 4 to the Owner-Engineer Agreement for QA/QC services
during the water and wastewater SCADA project.
2. Excavator Purchase
Public Works Director Brannigan presented the staff report regarding the
purchase of a new Excavator.
A motion was made by Council Member Spillman, seconded by Council Member
Parlet, and carried by voice vote, with Mayor Scheel absent, to authorize the City
Manager to sign a purchase order, and any other documentation that may be
required in the purchase of the excavator and accessories.
VIII.
CITY COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS:

A.
Miscellaneous Reports:
Chief Rasmussen invited Council out to observe the Polar Plunge a fundraiser for
Special Olympics. The City Manager will also participate. Chief Rasmussen will be
attending Cal Chiefs meeting next week. Lieutenant Ferguson will be in charge in
the Chiefs absence.
Finance Director Buffalo will be at California Society of Municipal Finance
Officers conference the rest of the week.
City Manager Silveira asked if Council would be available for a workshop on
March 3 at 5:00 p.m. to discuss the solid waste management contract. She also
asked whether Council could attend a goal setting meeting on March 27 from 9
am to noon.
Council member Turner announced the Chamber Mixer tomorrow. She will be
attending the Regional Economic Development workshop on February 27, 2015.
Council member Parlet will be speaking at the North Shore Business Association
meeting tomorrow.
Council member Spillman will be at the Westside Park to re-roof the storage
area. He also complimented the Road Crews who were quick to clean up after
recent storm events.
Mayor Pro Tem Mattina had nothing to report.
IX.
ADJOURNMENT:
Mayor Pro Tem Mattina adjourned the meeting at 7:54 p.m.
_______________________________________
Stacey Mattina, Mayor Pro Tem
_______________________________________
Kelly Buendia, Deputy City Clerk
2015-005
03/03/2015
From:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Date:
Brad Rasmussen
Hilary Britton
Jason Ferguson; Gary Basor; Mike Sobieraj; Rebekah Dolby
Re: Application 2015-005 - Future Bass Pro Tournament
Wednesday, February 11, 2015 5:02:13 PM
Hilary:
No police concerns.
Thanks
Brad Rasmussen
Chief of Police
Lakeport Police Department
Main: 707-263-5491
Cell: 707-367-6035
Police Website:
http://www.lakeportpolice.org/
Police FaceBook:https://www.facebook.com/pages/Lakeport-PoliceDepartment/176101292414821
Sent from my iPad
On Feb 11, 2015, at 4:22 PM, Hilary Britton <hbritton@cityoflakeport.com> wrote:
<image001.gif>
Hi All,
Please find attached Application 2015-005 from Future Pro Tours

for the FPT Classic Championship Bass Tournament to be held
March 6-8,2015 in Library Park & the Third Street Boat ramp for
your review and comments.
We would like to submit this to Council for the meeting of March

3, 2015, so please have any comments back to me by February
23, 2015.
Thank you for your input.
Hilary Britton
Department Secretary
City of Lakeport
225 Park Street
Lakeport, CA 95453
(707) 263-5615 x43
RESOLUTION NO. ____ (2015)

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
LAKEPORT AUTHORIZING
THE ACQUISITION OF 2025 SOUTH MAIN STREET, LAKEPORT
CALIFORNIA AND AUTHORIZING
DESIGNATED CITY STAFF TO EXECUTE ESCROW DOCUMENTS
AND CERTIFICATE OF ACCEPTANCE
WHEREAS, the Lakeport City Council previously authorized acquisition of real property at
2025 South Main Street, Lakeport, California (APN 005-045-42), the legal description of which is
included in Exhibit A hereto (the Property); and
WHEREAS, a written offer to acquire the Property has been negotiated; and
and
WHEREAS, an escrow account has been opened and the sale of the Property is pending;
WHEREAS, First American Title Company has requested a City of Lakeport Resolution
authorizing the acquisition of the Property, including authorization of the City Manager to execute
the escrow documents, under Government Code section 27281;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT:
1.
The City of Lakeport is authorized to acquire the Property under Government Code
section 37350.
2.
The City of Lakeport authorizes the acquisition of the Property located as a 2025
South Main Street, Lakeport, California (APN 005-045-42), which is legally described in Exhibit A
hereto.
3.
The City of Lakeport authorizes the City Manager or her designee to execute escrow
or sale documents on behalf of the City of Lakeport to conclude the purchase of said property
between the City of Lakeport and Jean D. Howe (seller).
4.
The City of Lakeport authorizes the City Clerk or her designee to execute a
certificate of acceptance on behalf of the City.
The foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council
on the 3rd day of March, 2015, by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAINING:
ABSENT:
Council Members
None
None
None
________________________________
MARTIN SCHEEL, Mayor
ATTEST:
________________________________
JANEL M. CHAPMAN, City Clerk
CERTIFICATE OF ACCEPTANCE
This is to certify that the interest in real property conveyed by the deed or grant
deed dated March 3, 2015 from Jean D. Howe to the City of Lakeport, a political
corporation and/or government agency is hereby accepted by the undersigned officer or
agent on behalf of the City Council of the City of Lakeport pursuant to authority
conferred by Resolution No. ____ (2015) of the Lakeport City Council adopted on March
3, 2015, and the grantee consents to recordation thereof by its duly authorized officer.
Dated: March 3, 2015
City of Lakeport
By: ______________________________
Janel M. Chapman, City Clerk
Redwood Empire
Municipal Insurance
Fund
City of Lakeport
March 3, 2015
Redwood Empire Municipal Insurance Fund

City of Lakeport
Established 1976 (Public Entity)
15 Members 5 Counties
7 founding members in 1976
Self Insured (No Insurance)
Liability, General/Auto
Workers Compensation
Other Coverage Programs

City of Lakeport
Who are the REMIF members?

Arcata
Lakeport (12-31-78)
Cloverdale*
Rohnert Park*
Cotati*
Sebastopol*
Eureka
Sonoma*
Ft. Bragg
St. Helena
Fortuna
Ukiah*
Healdsburg*
Willits
* 7 Founding Members
Town of Windsor

City of Lakeport
REMIF Joined California Joint Powers Risk
Management Authority (Superpool)
CJPRMA Established 1986 (Public Entity)
122 Statewide Members
Self Insured
Liability, General/Auto & Other Coverage Programs
March, 1986 - TIME Magazine

documents the insurance crisis
in America
In California, many local
governmental entities found that
coverage was either priced out of
their reach or completely
unavailable. Insurance
companies refused to write
coverage for most public
agencies and canceled those
they had.
California enacted legislation to
permit public entities to pool for
insurance and risk management.

City of Lakeport
Why Self Insure?

15 Stockholders, No Money to Outside Sources
Dividends (Refunds) Paid To Members and Not To
Outsiders

City of Lakeport
General/Auto Liability Program

REMIF Member Deductibles - $5,000-$25,000 Per Incident
REMIF is Self Insured to $500,000 Per Incident (Pooled Funds)
CJPRMA - Self Insured $500,000 to $5,000,000 Per Incident
(Pooled Funds)
CJPRMA Excess Coverage $5 million to $40,000,000 Per
Incident

City of Lakeport
Workers Compensation Program

Lakeports Deductible - $5,000 Per Injury.
REMIF is Self Insured to $1,000,000 Per Injury (Pooled Funds)
Purchase statutory (unlimited) Coverage Over $1,000,000 Per
Injury
99.9% of All Claims Under $1,000,000

City of Lakeport
Funding Process (Premiums) for Liability/Workers

Compensation Programs
Actuarial Study
75% Confidence Level for Premiums
Additional $1 million Cushion in Reserves
Anything over these Reserve Levels goes
Back to Members as Refunds
Lakeport FY 14-15 Premium
Liability $64,318 Workers Comp $133,352

City of Lakeport
Total Refunds for All Members

Liability Refunds
Past 18 Years
$18,657,853
Workers Compensation Refunds
Past 17 Years
$7,757,315

City of Lakeport
Lakeport Refunds Since 1996

Liability
$1,267,465 or 73% of Premiums
Workers Compensation
$108,649 or 18 % of Premiums

City of Lakeport
Other Coverages
Property Insurance - $300,000,000 Per Occurrence
Boiler Machinery - $22,500,000 per occurrence
Auto Physical Damage - $5,000,000 per occurrence
Employee Dishonesty Bonds
Earthquake/Flood (DIC) Coverage
Pollution
Subrogation
Redwood Empire Municipal Insurance Fund City of

Lakeport
Non-Casualty Coverages
Medical Blue Cross
Dental Delta Dental
Vision - VSP
Life/Disability Insurance
Employee Assistance Program (EAP)

Lakeport
Services
Training
- Specific/Annual
- CAJPA/PARMA/CALPELRA
(Statewide Conferences)
- Assist in Finding Trainers

Lakeport
Risk Transference Program for City Contracts
Resource Providers
- Consortium for Preparation

of Police manuals/training
- Consortium for Personnel
Advice/Training
- Set up Pre-Employment
Physical Standards
- Set up DOT Drug/Alcohol
Testing System

Lakeport
Conclusions
Members are the Stockholders
Members have a say in their fate

There are 15 members, 15 personalities, individual needs
are responded to,
Basic Benefits: Lower Costs, Rewards (refunds) for good
results due to prevention and aggressive handling, cost
effective employee benefit programs
CITY OF LAKEPORT
City Council
City of Lakeport Municipal Sewer District
Lakeport Redevelopment Successor Agency
STAFF REPORT
RE: Lake County Vector Control District General Plan Amendment
and Zone Change
MEETING DATE:
03/03/2015
GPA 13-01 / ZC 13-01 / ER 13-01

SUBMITTED BY:
Kevin M. Ingram, Community Development Director
PURPOSE OF REPORT:
Information only
Discussion
Action Item
WHAT IS BEING ASKED OF THE CITY COUNCIL/BOARD:

The City Council is being asked to initiate proceedings and set a public hearing for the consideration of a
Resolution for a General Plan Amendment from Residential and Resort Residential to Public and Civic Uses and
an Ordinance for a Zone Change from R-5 Resort Residential to PCU Public and Civic Uses on land owned by the
Lake County Vector Control District. This staff report also incorporates the California Environmental Quality Act
Initial Study/Environmental Review prepared for the proposed project. The subject properties are located at
408 and 410 Esplanade Street and 35 C Street and are further described as 025-501-17, -18, -36 and -39. A
recent merger combined several parcels but this report will reference the old APNs for consistency.
BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION:
On November 12, 2014 the Lakeport Planning Commission held a public hearing and considered the General
Plan Amendment and Zone Change proposed by the Lake County Vector Control District. The subject properties
are designated by the City of Lakeport General Plan Land Use Map and Lakeport Zoning Ordinance as shown in
the following table. This table also includes the proposed General Plan and Zoning designations:
APN/Address/Uses
025-501-17
410 Esplanade Existing
Lab/Office
025-501-18
Existing Parking Lot on
Esplanade. 410 Esplanade is
address per Assessors
Office.
025-501-36
408 Esplanade Existing
Maintenance Building (408
is posted address, 410 per
Assessors Office)
025-501-39
35 C Street Existing
Fenced Temporary Parking
Lot
Existing General Plan

Designation
Residential
Proposed General Plan

Designation
Public Civic Use
Existing
Zoning
PCU
Proposed Zoning
PCU
Residential
Public Civic Use
PCU
PCU
Resort Residential
Public Civic Use
PCU
PCU
Resort Residential
Public Civic Use
R-5
PCU
The following map identifies the properties that are owned by the applicant and are the subject of this
application.
During the course of the November 12, 2014 public hearing the public raised several concerns related, but not
limited to: parking, use of an existing private lake access easement, hazardous materials storage and the
purported piecemealing of the environmental review process related to potential future development. As a
result the Planning Commission voted to continue the public hearing to January 14, 2015 and stay any action.
Subsequent to the November 12th public hearing, Planning staff requested and received revised information
from the Lake County Vector Control District and consulted the City Attorney regarding claims related to the
purported piecemealing of the CEQA environmental review. A more detailed analysis of the issues and
evaluation of the responses to inquiries can be found in Staffs Memorandum to the Planning Commission for
the January 14, 2015 public hearing (Attachment 8). Based upon the received responses, Planning staff made
the determination that all the questions and concerns raised by the Planning Commission and the public at the
November 12, 2014 public hearing had been satisfactorily addressed and new information did not result in any
new environmental impacts that required the addition of new mitigation measures beyond those originally
contained in the staff report dated September 25, 2014 (Attachment 6).
At its meeting of January 14, 2015, the Planning Commission considered the newly presented information and
took additional public comment. Upon the conclusion of the public hearing, the Planning Commission, by a vote
of 3-1, made a recommendation that the City Council approve the requested General Plan Amendment and
Zone Change and adopt the recommended Mitigated Negative Declaration associated with the project.
OPTIONS:
1. Introduce the proposed Zone Change Ordinance; and schedule a public hearing on April 7, 2015 for the
second reading of the Zone Change Ordinance, consideration of a Resolution for General Plan Amendment
and adoption of a Mitigated Negative Declaration for the proposed project.
2. Take no action or take action to deny the project.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None
Budgeted Item?
Budget Adjustment Needed?

Affected fund(s):
Yes
General Fund
Yes
No
No
If yes, amount of appropriation increase: $
Water OM Fund
Sewer OM Fund
Other:
Comments: None
SUGGESTED MOTIONS:
Move to introduce Ordinance No. ### (2015); and schedule a public hearing for a second reading of the
Ordinance for Zone Change ZC 13-01, consideration of Resolution No. #### (2015) for General Plan Amendment
GPA 13-01 and adoption of a Mitigated Negative Declaration based on the Environmental Review/Initial Study
ER 13-01.
Attachments:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
Ordinance No. ### (2015)

Draft Resolution No. #### (2015)
Minute Order, Lakeport Planning Commission (January 14, 2015)
Abbreviated Minutes, Lakeport Planning Commission (November 12, 2014)
Application Packet
Staff Report to Planning Commission, September 25, 2014
Supplemental Memorandum to Planning Commission, November 5, 2014
Continuation Memorandum to Planning Commission, January 8, 2015
Supplemental Continuation Memorandum to Planning Commission, January
13, 2015
10. Materials submitted by public to Planning Commission at January 14, 2015
public hearing
ATTACHMENT 1
ORDINANCE NO.
(2015)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKEPORT AMENDING THE

CITY OF LAKEPORT ZONING MAP(S) FOR APN 025-501-39 KNOWN AS THE LANDS
OF LAKE COUNTY VECTOR CONTROL DISTRICT
WHEREAS, the owners of the subject property (APN 025-501-39) have applied
for a Zone Change (ZC 13-01) from the R-5 Resort/Residential base Zoning District to
the PCU Public and Civic Uses base Zoning District; and
WHEREAS, the City of Lakeport Planning Commission has conducted two public
hearings (November 12, 2014 and January 14, 2015) on the proposal submitted by the
Lake County Vector Control District and recommended that the City Council adopt the
proposed Zone Change; and
WHEREAS, the Lakeport City Council have conducted public hearings (March 3,
2015 and April 7, 2015) on the request and considered the pertinent facts; and
WHEREAS, the proposed rezoning is in conformance with Chapter 17.32 of the
Lakeport Municipal Code.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKEPORT DOES ORDAIN AS
FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1
Pursuant to Sections 17.32.010 and 17.16.010 of the Lakeport
Municipal Code, the Zoning Map of the City of Lakeport is hereby amended to rezone
the designated land identified and described on the map entitled Exhibit A, from R-5
Resort/Residential to PCU Public and Civic Uses.
SECTION 2
The City Clerk is hereby directed to cause the Zoning Map of the
City of Lakeport to be amended to show the number and date of this Ordinance and to
reflect the change effected thereby.
SECTION 3
The City Council finds that the proposed amendment is in the
publics interest, is consistent with the Lakeport General Plan, and is not detrimental to
the communitys health, safety, and welfare.
SECTION 4 The City Council further finds that the environmental impacts of this
rezoning have been adequately addressed in the Initial Study and Mitigated Negative
Declaration (ER 13-01), and that appropriate mitigation measures have been imposed
for the identified impacts. Based on the Initial Study and Mitigated Negative
Declaration, and all additional evidence in the record, the City Council hereby adopts
the Mitigated Negative Declaration indicating that the project will not have a significant
ATTACHMENT 1
adverse effect on the environment with the implementation of mitigation measures

noted in the study.
SECTION 5
All code sections or parts of code sections in conflict herewith are
hereby repealed to the extent of such conflict and no further.
SECTION 6
Within fifteen (15) days of its passage, this Ordinance shall be
published at least once in the Lake County Record-Bee, a newspaper of general
circulation printed and published within the City of Lakeport.
SECTION 7 If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion of this
Ordinance or its application to any person or circumstance is for any reason held to be
invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such
decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance or its
application to other persons and circumstances. The City Council of the City of Lakeport
hereby declares that it would have adopted this Ordinance and each section,
subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion thereof irrespective of the fact that any
one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses, phrases, or portions be declared
invalid or unconstitutional and, to that end, the provisions hereof are hereby declared
to be severable.
SECTION 8 This Ordinance shall take effect thirty days after its adoption
pursuant to California Government Code section 36937.
This Ordinance was introduced before the City Council of the City of Lakeport at a
regular meeting thereof on the 3rd day of March, 2015, by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
This Ordinance was duly enacted by the City Council of the City of Lakeport at a regular
meeting thereof on the 7th day of April, 2015, by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
___________________________
MARTIN SCHEEL, MAYOR
ATTACHMENT 1
ATTEST:
_____________________________
City of Lakeport
ATTACHMENT 1
EXHIBIT B
LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPERTY
That certain real property located at 35 C Street, Lakeport, California, APN 005045-39, and as legally described as follows:
PARCEL ONE: Beginning at a point on the Southerly line of First Avenue ) now
known as C Street: in the City of Lakeport, said point being 268 feet Easterly,
measured along the Southerly line of said First Avenue from the Easterly line of
Main Street in said City, and being also the Northeast corner of that certain tract
of land conveyed by L.L. Sanchez et ux., to Lake County Mosquito Abatement
District, by deed dated February 14, 1962, recorded February 21, 1962, in book
369 of Official Records of Lake County at page 164, and running thence Easterly,
along the Southerly line of said First Avenue, 43 feet; thence Southerly, parallel
to the Easterly line of said Main Street, 75 feet to a point; thence Westerly,
parallel to the Southerly line of said First Avenue, 43 feet, more or less, to the
Easterly line of said tract so conveyed to Lake County Mosquito Abatement
District; and thence Northerly, along the Easterly line of said tract so conveyed to
the Lake County Mosquito Abatement District, 75 feet to the point of beginning.
PARCEL TWO: beginning at the Southeast corner of that certain tract of land as
described in the deed from L.L. Sanchez, ET UX., to Robert Biagini, et ux., dated
May 22, 1963, recorded May 29, 1963, in book 400 of Official Records of Lake
County at page 99, said point being Southerly, measured parallel to the Easterly
line of Main Street in the Town of Lakeport, 75 feet from a point on the Southerly
line of First Avenue (now know as C Street) that is Easterly, measured along
said Southerly line, 311 feet from the Easterly line of said Main Street, and
running thence Southerly, parallel to the Easterly line of said Main Street, 25.5
feet to the Southerly line of that certain tract of land as described in the deed
from Union Oil Company of California, a corporation, to Juanita W. Sanchez,
dated September 24, 1942, recorded October 14, 1942 in book 146 of Official
Records of Lake County at page 261; thence Westerly, along the Southerly line
of said Sanchez tract, 43 feet to the Easterly line of said certain tract of land as
described in the deed form L.L. Sanchez to the Lake County Mosquito
Abatement District, dated February 14, 1962 recorded February 21, 1962, in
book 369 of Official Records of Lake County at page 164; thence Northerly,
along the Easterly line of said Lake County Mosquito Abatement District tract
25.5 feet to the Southwest corner of said Biagini tract; thence Easterly along the
Southerly line of said Biagini tract, 43 feet to the point of beginning.
ATTACHMENT 2
RESOLUTION NO. **** (2015)

A RESOLUTION OF THE LAKEPORT CITY COUNCIL AMENDING THE LAND USE
DESIGNATION PLAN (Figure 1) OF THE CITY OF LAKEPORT GENERAL PLAN
FOR APNs 025-501-17, 025-501-18, 025-501-36 AND 025-501-39 KNOWN AS
THE LANDS OF LAKE COUNTY VECTOR CONTROL DISTRICT FROM RESIDENTIAL AND
RESORT RESIDENTIAL TO PUBLIC AND CIVIC USES
WHEREAS, Section 65361 of the Government Code of the State of California limits the
amendment of the Lakeport General Plan to not more than four times per year; and
WHEREAS, this Resolution is presented as the second quarter amendment of 2015; and
WHEREAS, the City of Lakeport Planning Commission has conducted two public
hearings (November 12, 2014 and January 14, 2015) on the proposal submitted by the Lake
County Vector Control District (GPA 13-01) and recommended that the City Council adopt the
proposed General Plan Amendment; and
WHEREAS, the Lakeport City Council conducted a public hearing on April 7, 2015 to
consider the recommendation made by the Planning Commission and approved said
amendments.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT:
A.
The Land Use Designation Map (Figure 1) of the Lakeport General Plan is hereby amended
to change lands described as APNs 025-501-17, 025-501-18 from Residential to Public and
Civic Uses and lands described as APNs 025-501-36 and 025-501-39 from Resort
Residential to Public and Civic Uses as shown by the map marked as Exhibit A.
B.
The lands described as APNs 025-501-17, 025-501-18, 025-501-36 and 025-501-39 are
further described in the legal description marked as Exhibit B to this Resolution.
C.
The findings in support of the amendment of the General Plan are as follows:
1. The Lakeport General Plan establishes four criteria which must be satisfied to approve
a General Plan amendment.
a. The project proponent must demonstrate in a factual way that the proposed
amendment benefits the publics interest.
b. The proposed amendment must be consistent and compatible with the remainder
of the General Plan and any implementation programs that it may affect.
c. The potential impacts of the General Plan amendment have been assessed and
have been determined not to be detrimental to the public health, safety, and
welfare.
ATTACHMENT 2
d. The amendment has been processed according to the California Government Code
and California Environmental Quality Act.
2. The City Council finds that:
a. The proposed General Plan Amendments are in the publics interest as changes will
result in the correction of discrepancies that exist between the existing general
plan land use designations and that of the physical use of the buildings and
facilities located upon the land for more than sixty years. The Lake County Vector
Control District is a public entity that provides services that benefit the publics
health, safety and welfare. The District has experienced a pattern of growth and
expansion of their services and responsibilities. As public agencies grow and the
demand for public services increases over time, so does their need for buildings,
facilities, personnel and floor space.
b. The proposed General Plan Amendments are consistent with the Lakeport General
Plan and will result in the correction of incompatible and inconsistent General Plan
designations and make them consistent with the historic, present and proposed
uses of the applicants land. The General Plan encourages appropriate land uses
and the provision of a variety of services for its citizenry, such as Vector Control.
The adopted mitigation measures associated with this proposal seek to balance
the need to preserve natural resources and the existing neighborhood character
while at the same time allowing for the provision of valuable community services.
c. The proposed General Plan Amendment will not be contrary to the public health,
safety, or welfare. A majority of the subject properties have been utilized by the
Lake County Vector Control District since 1954. The District provides services
which benefit the public and are necessary to the overall health, safety and
welfare of the community. The adopted mitigation measures associated with this
proposal acknowledge that any future expansion of this site will have a direct
effect upon the surrounding neighborhood and mitigations for increased parking
and the management of hazardous materials must be considered.
d. The map of the General Plan is an expression of the Citys intent with respect to
the most appropriate land use pattern within the City. The change in land use
designations for the subject properties will result in the correction of incompatible
and inconsistent General Plan designations and make them consistent with the
historic, present and proposed uses of the applicants land. For this reason, there
would be very little detriment associated with the proposal. The potential impacts
of the proposed General Plan Zone amendments have been assessed, and there do
not appear to be any detrimental impacts to the publics health, safety, or welfare.
The proposed General Plan Amendment has been processed in accordance with
the California Environmental Quality Act. The City has completed the Initial Study /
Mitigated Negative Declaration for the project and mitigation measures have been
incorporated into the project which will reduce the impacts to a less than
significant level.
ATTACHMENT 2
3. Based on the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration, and all additional evidence
in the record, the City Council hereby adopts the Mitigated Negative Declaration
indicating that the project will not have a significant adverse effect on the
environment with the implementation of mitigation measures noted in the study.
This Resolution was passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Lakeport at a regular
meeting held on the 7th day of April, 2015.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
__________________________________
MARTIN SCHEEL, Mayor
City of Lakeport
ATTEST:
________________________________
ATTACHMENT 2
EXHIBIT B
LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPERTY
That certain real property known as APN 025-501-18 containing a portion of
property described as 410 Esplanade Street, Lakeport, California, APN 005-045-39, and
as legally described as follows:
BEGINNING at a point within the Northeast quarter of Section 25, Township 14
North, Range 10 West, M. D. M., that is North 0 16 East 248 feet from a point
on the North line of Block 7 as shown on that certain map entitled LUPOYAMA
PARK IN LAKEPORT, filed in the office of the County Recorder of said Lake
County on July 17, 1924, in Vol. 3 of Town Maps at page 104, that is East,
measured along the North line of said Block 7, 175 feet from the Northwest
corner of said Block 7, said Northwesterly corner of said Block 7 being on the
East line of Main Street in the Town of Lakeport, and running thence, from said
point of beginning, North 0 16 East 30 feet; thence North 89 43 East 44 feet;
thence, along a curve to the right with a radius of 20 feet, in a Southeasterly
direction, through a distance of 31.41feet; thence South 0 16 West 10 feet to a
point that is North 89 43 East 64 feet from point the beginning; and thence
South 89 43 West 64 feet to the point of beginning.
Together with that certain real property known as APN 025-501-47 (formerly
known as APNs 025-501-17, 025-501-36 and 025-501-39) containing 35 C Street,
Lakeport and a portion of property described as 410 Esplanade Street, Lakeport,
California, and as legally described as follows:
BEGINNING at the Easterly line of C Street (formerly known as First Avenue) in
the City of Lakeport, said point of beginning being 218 feet Easterly, measured
along the Southerly line of said C Street from the Easterly line of Main Street in
said city, and being also the Northwest corner of that certain tract of land
conveyed by L.L. Sanchez et ux., to the Lake County Mosquito Abatement
District, by deed dated February 14, 1962, recorded February 21, 1962, in book
369 of Official Records of Lake County at page 164, and thence running Easterly
along the Southerly line of said C Street, 93 feet; thence Southerly and parallel to
the Easterly line of said Main Street, 100.50 feet to the Southerly line of that
certain tract of land as described in the deed from Union Oil Company of
California, a corporation, to Juanita W. Sanchez, dated September 24, 1942,
recorded October 14, 1942 in book 146 of official records of Lake County at Page
261; thence Easterly along the Southerly line of said Sanchez tract 479 feel M/L
to the East line of Section 25, Township 14 North, Range 10 West, M.D.M.;
ATTACHMENT 2
thence South along the East line of said Section 60 feet; thence North 892039
West 520 feet; thence North 011221 East to a point on the South line of said
Sanchez tract that is 52 feet+ Easterly of the Southwest corner of said Sanchez
tract; thence Westerly along the Southerly line of said tract 52 feet+, thence
Northerly and parallel to the Easterly line of said main Street, 100.50 feet to the
point of beginning.
ATTACHMENT 3
ATTACHMENT 3
ATTACHMENT 4
CITY OF LAKEPORT
ABBREVIATED MINUTES
PLANNING COMMISSION
November 12, 2014
MINUTES
ZC 13-01/GPA 13-01/ ER 13-01 Lake County Vector Control District

Application for Zone Change, General Plan Amendment and Environmental
Review for properties located at 408 and 410 Esplanade St. and 35 C St. (APNs
025-501-36, 025-501-17, 025-501-18 and 025-501-39)
Planning Services Manager Britton addressed the Commission advising the
project consisted of General Plan Amendments from Residential and Resort
Residential to Public and Civic Uses and a Zone change from R-5 Resort
Residential to PCU Public and Civic Uses on land owned by the Lake County
Vector Control District. Britton advised that the staff report incorporates the
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) initial study and environmental
review of the proposed applications.
Britton stated the staff report includes a table which identifies existing and
proposed General Plan Designations and Zoning Designations, a map of the
project area, a site description and a project description. The District is
requesting that the City approve a General Plan Amendment to designate all of
its lands as PCU Public and Civic Uses, which is the appropriate type of Land
Use designation for the Districts current and future activities. The District is also
requesting a Zone Change for the parcel at 35 C Street from R-5 Resort
Residential to PCU Public and Civic Uses in order to achieve consistency
between the General Plan and Zoning designations.
Britton advised as noted in the site description section of staff report the
applicant has completed a voluntary merger of the three existing contiguous
parcels. The merger has been recorded however a new APN for the newly
merged parcel is still pending. There is discussion in the staff report regarding the
districts future plans which staff believes is important to acknowledge. However,
Britton emphasized that the current application was limited to the applications
for the General Plan Amendments and Zone Change.
Britton advised the General Plan Amendment and Zone Change actions must
be reviewed by the Planning Commission and forwarded on to the City Council
in the form of a recommendation. The City Council must conduct a public
ATTACHMENT 4
hearing and consider the issues and factors involved in the proposal and must
make a final decision. Assuming that the City Council approves the General
Plan Amendments and Rezoning request, a City Council Resolution and Zone
Change Ordinance must be approved.
The proposed General Plan Amendments and Zone Change applications
submitted by the Lake County Vector Control District are in general conformity
with the City of Lakeport General Plan and Zoning Ordinance as documented in
the staff report. The General Plan Amendments and Zone Change will rectify a
long standing issue for the City in that the General Plan designations of the
parcels are not appropriate and dont fit the existing and proposed uses. The
Resort Residential General Plan designations on APNs 025-501-36 and -39 and
the Residential designations on APNs 025-501-17 and -18 are inconsistent and an
amendment to Public and Civic Uses is appropriate.
Similarly, the Zoning designation of R-5 Resort Residential on APN 025-501-39 (35
C Street) is inconsistent with the proposed General Plan designation and a
change to PCU Public and Civic Uses is appropriate.
The analysis and information in this report along with the facts and information
provided by the applicant as contained in the City file support an approval of
the proposed General Plan Amendments and Zone Change. Approval of the
proposed General Plan Amendments and Zone Change will facilitate the
Districts expansion plans.
The proposed General Plan Amendments and Zone Change of the parcels
owned by the Lake County Vector Control District as described in the staff report
do have the potential to impact the environment unless mitigation measures are
incorporated into the project approval.
Staff has developed mitigation
measures which have been agreed to by the applicant, and when
implemented will mitigate the potential impacts of the General Plan and Zoning
changes to a less than significant level.
Future site improvements and expansion projects will be subject to subsequent
CEQA environmental review and mitigation as well as the Citys Architectural
and Design review process.
Staff supports a Planning Commission recommendation to the City Council for
the adoption of a Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Lake County Vector
Control General Plan Amendments and Zone Change project as provided for in
the California Environmental Quality Act, subject to the mitigation measures set
forth by the Planning Commission.
Commissioner Wicks spoke regarding the current project application that there is
a lot of information that pertains to future construction and he wanted to clarify
that the current project application was one of two being proposed, the second
to take place in the event that construction is formally proposed and brought
back to the Planning Commission in the future for approval. Planning Services
ATTACHMENT 4
Manager Britton agreed this was correct. Wicks continued advising that some of
the issues listed such as traffic and access, etc. may not actually be a part of the
current project discussion but that it was important to add the information to the
minutes and the reports in the future.
Public hearing was opened at 5:37 p.m.; Commissioner Wicks stated looking at
the preliminary plans and considering the future plans proposed, he believes the
Land Use and Planning section of the initial study should be looked at a little
closer before they move forward to construction phase. Wicks then asked when
this was reviewed how much emphasis was this given? Britton advised that an
adequate amount of attention was given to the Land Use and Planning issues.
Commissioner Russell questioned if there was going to be any change from what
they are going to be doing to what they have proposed to be doing. Britton
referred the question to the project applicant.
Commissioner Kauper questioned if it would have been easier to bring the
current item, the General Plan Amendment and Zone change, and the future
construction project to the Planning Commission at the same time? Britton
stated that it was staffs opinion that they were two separate issues. It was
suggested that with respect to the majority of the land that the Vector Control
District currently owns, these were more or less clean up issues. They have
existing uses; the existing uses are consistent with the current Zoning but
inconsistent with respect to the General Plan designation.
Input was given by Jamesina Scott, applicant spoke in support of the project;
Verna Schaffer, resident; Jeff Hansen, resident; Rob & Barbara Bertsch, resident;
Charles Hodgson, resident; John Trone, resident; and Val McMurdie, resident
each spoke expressing concerns or opposition to the project. Public hearing
closed at 6:18 p.m.
Commissioner Kauper stated he would like to see the future plans and know
what is going on before he makes a decision. Based on the way the applicants
operations have incrementally changed over the years and things that have
been approved and promised to happen but have not, he believes this is the
time to look at the whole thing as a project and include overall comprehensive
review including the buildings, etc. Britton responded that the applicant may
not be prepared to do that at this time. The applicant has a right to apply for
these applications at this point. There is no guarantee they will come forward
with future construction plans. Kauper advised he was not comfortable making
a decision without more information, he would like to see what they are
proposing to do such as a whole comprehensive review.
Public hearing was opened again at 6:22 p.m., input was given by Jamesina
Scott, project applicant. Public hearing closed at 6:30 p.m.
ATTACHMENT 4
Commissioner Wicks advised he can see both the Citys direction which is a
good one and the neighboring residents concerns. He is going to need more
time to consider the project before he could give his decision.
Commissioner Taylor agreed that some of the issues that the residents brought
up were valid issues; however, when the applicant makes a plan they will be
addressed by the Planning Commission at that time.
Commissioner Russell advised that she is in favor of exploring the matter further
and agrees with Commissioner Kauper in wanting more information before
giving a decision on the matter.
Public hearing was opened again at 6:35 p.m., input was given by Jamesina
Scott, project applicant; Ron Bertsch, resident; spoke also on the issue. Public
hearing closed at 6:41 p.m.
Commissioner Kauper moved to table the item for 60 days with the matter to be
placed on the January 14, 2015, meeting agenda. Commissioner Russell
seconded the motion.
Britton requested that the Commissioners contact him with any specific
questions regarding this item before the January meeting.
The vote was called and was as follows:
AYES: Commissioners Kauper, Wicks and Russell
NOES: Commissioner Taylor and Chairman Gayner
(3-2)
Respectfully submitted,
ANDREW BRITTON
Planning Services Manager
Community Development Department
These are the summary Minutes of the Planning Commission meeting. A recorded tape of the
meeting is available at the Community Development Department at Lakeport City Hall, 225 Park
Street, Lakeport, California for a period of 30 days after the approval of these Minutes.
ATTACHMENT 5
Office 707-263-4
7i f
leve~d .er~ www.ltve...ocg
3- 653
Andrew Britton
City of Lakeport
Community Development Department
225 Park Street
Lakeport, 95453
Received
April 22, 2013
March 28, 2013

Dear Andrew,
The District is seeking a voluntary merger of three parcels, a zone change to one parcel, and a
General Plan amendments for four parcels to facilitate improvements to the Lake County
Vector Control Districts (District) facility as described below and in the Supplemental
Attachment:
a) Voluntary Merger: The District is requesting a voluntary merger of three contiguous
parcels (APN5 025-501-17, 025-501-36, and 025-501-39). The merger is needed
because the future improvements proposed in Phase 1 of this project will extend
over existing property lines.
b) Zoning Amendment: The District is requesting an amendment to the Zoning
Designation for APN 025-501-39 from Resort Residential (R-5) to Public & Civic Uses
(PCU) to make the zoning consistent with the adjoining District-owned parcels 025501-17 and 025-501-36.
c) General Plan Amendments: The District is requesting an amendment to the General
Plan Designation to correct inconsistencies between the present General Plan and
Zoning Designations for three parcels: the Zoning Designations for APN5 025-501-17,
025-501-18, and 025-501-36 as PCU is consistent with their actual use since 1954,
however in the General Plan Designations, APN5 025-501-36 and 025-501-39 appear
as Resort Residential, and APN5 025-501-17 and 025-501-18 appear as Residential.
The District is requesting an amendment to the General Plan to designate those four
parcels as Public and Civic Use (PCU).
The existing and proposed uses, zoning, general plan designations for all four parcels are
summarized in the Table 1 on the following page.
These proposed amendments are intended to make the Zoning and General Plan Designations
consistent with the historical use of these properties and the projected use of APN 025-501-39.
410 Esplanade
PC Box 310
Lakeport, CA 95453
ATTACHMENT 5
ATTACHMENT 5
The Lake County Vector Control Districts main facility is located at 410 Esplanade (APN 025501-17), Lakeport. The District has operated from this location since 1954. In December 2011,
the District purchased the property at 35 C Street (APN 025-501-39), which sits between two
other District-owned parcels (APN 025-501-17 and APN 025-501-36) to acquire space for both
the anticipated replacement of the existing laboratory/operations building and to meet the off
street parking requirements for ADAcompliant parking.
The remainder of this letter is intended to address the amendment criteria for the Zoning and
General Plan Amendments (Sections 17.32.010 and 17.32.020, respectively).
1. The proposed Zoning and General Plan Amendments are in the publics interest.
The Lake County Vector Control District is a public health agency that protects Lake County
residents and visitors from vectors and vector-borne diseases. The proposed amendments
would correct existing inconsistencies between the Zoning and General Plan Designations
and make them consistent with the historical and actual uses of the parcels.
A) Proposed Zoning Amendment
The property at 35 C Street (APN 025-501-39) is zoned as R-5 (Resort/High Density
Residential) and designated as Resort Residential in the General Plan. The District
purchased this property in 2011 to allow for improvements to the Districts main facility
because this parcel connects two existing District parcels (APN 025-501-17 and APN 025501-36). Changing the zoning of APN-025-501-39 to Public & Civic Use (PCU) would
correctly reflect its present use and ownership by the District.
B) Proposed General Plan Amendments
The two parcels at 410 Esplanade (APN 025-501-17 and APN 025-501-18) have been
owned by the District since 1954 and are zoned correctly as PCU but designated as
Residential in the General Plan; changing their designations to PCU in the General Plan
would correct this inconsistency.
The property at 408 Esplanade (APN 025-501-36) has been owned by the District since
1962 and is zoned correctly as PCU but designated as Resort Residential in the General
Plan; changing its designation to PCU in the General Plan would correct this
inconsistency.
The property at 35 C Street (APN 025-501-39) is designated as Resort Residential in the
General Plan. The District purchased this property in 2011 to allow for improvements to
the Districts main facility because this parcel connects two existing District parcels (APN
025-501-17 and APN 025-501-36). Changing both the General Plan designation of APN025-501-39 to PCU would correctly reflect its present use and ownership by the District.
The above amendments would allow the District to improve its main facility, which would
improve the appearance of the property and provide for more efficient use of space,
ATTACHMENT 5
improved services, and compliance with universal access requirements mandated by the
Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA).
2. The proposed Zoning and General Plan Amendments are consistent and compatible with
the entire General Plan and any implementation programs that may be affected.
The District has operated out of the Esplanade facility (APNs 025-501-17, 025-501-18, and
025-501-36) for nearly 60 years. The District is requesting amendments to the Zoning and
General Plan that are consistent with the actual and historical use of three of the affected
parcels (APNs 025-501-17, 025-501-18, and 025-501-36); the District is requesting that the
parcel at 35 C Street (APN 025-501-39) be included in the proposed Zoning and General Plan
amendments to conform to the adjacent District-owned parcels.
3. The potential impacts of the proposed Zoning and General Plan Amendments have been
assessed and have been determined not to be detrimental to the communitys and
publics health, safety, and welfare.
The 410 Esplanade facility will continue to serve as the Districts main facility with no
planned increases to activity. The present facility is outdated and does not provide
sufficient workspace for the vector control technicians or the laboratory requirements of
the District. The planned improvements to the main facility are intended to provide
adequate working space for the existing employees and to accommodate improvements to
the laboratory to meet present safety requirements. The District anticipates no increase in
the number of staff or the number of daily visitors (deliveries, residents requesting service),
or traffic. Any increase in stormwater impacts from increased runoff will be mitigated in
compliance with City regulations.
4. The proposed Zoning and General Plan Amendments comply with and have been
processed in accordance with the applicable provisions of the California Government
Code and the California Environmental Quality Act.
The District is required to comply with CEQA. The District does not anticipate any changes
in the number of employees or vehicle traffic. Net changes in the projected uses of the
parcels is limited to the 35 C Street property (APN 025-501-39). The District is requesting
that the zoning and General Plan designations be amended from R-5/Resort Residential to
PCU, which would allow for the planned improvements. For APNs 025-501-17 and 025-50136 we do not anticipate any net changes. We believe that a mitigated negative declaration
is the appropriate environmental review.
If you have any questions or require additional information, please contact me or our engineer,
Bill VanDerWall.
ATTACHMENT 5
Thank you for your help in this process.

Sincerely,
istrict Manager and Research Director
ATTACHMENT 5
ATTACHMENT 5
ATTACHMENT 5
ATTACHMENT 5
Environmental Review
Supplemental Attachment
Change in scenic views or vistas from existing residential areas or public lands or roads:
The existing view shall be changed by the demolition of an existing brick faade building (Figure
1). The existing building will be replaced by
an addition to the existing administrative
building (Phase 1), which is located behind
the present laboratory building. The
architectural style of the new addition will
match the style of the existing
administrative building. There will be no
additional loss of lake views due to the new
construction.
Relationship to a larger project or series of
Figure 1. The District plans to remove this antiquated
projects:
laboratory/operational building and replace it with a
The Lake County Vector Control District is a modern, efficient facility that will be built as an addition
to the existing administrative building, which is located
public health agency that protects Lake
behind it.
County residents and visitors from vectors
and vector-borne diseases. The District is an independent special district that operates under
the California Health and Safety Code. The Districts main facility is located at 410 Esplanade in
Lakeport (APNs 025-501-17, 025-501-18, and 025-501-36). The District has operated from this
location since 1954. In December 2011, the District purchased the property at 35 C Street (APN
025-501-39, which sits between two other District-owned parcels (see attached map).
The District demolished the dilapidated residence at 35 C Street in compliance with a city
nuisance abatement order that was in place at the time of purchase; the property was graded,
graveled, secured with a temporary fence, and is being used temporarily for offstreet parking
of District vehicles. The District plans to use that parcel to accommodate the planned
laboratory and future garage improvements that would extend over existing property lines.
The District is seeking a voluntary merger of three parcels (APNs 025-501-17, 025-501-36, and
025-501-39) to facilitate improvements to the Districts facility, and amendments to the zoning
designation for one parcel (APN 501-025-39) and the General Plan designations for four parcels
(APNs 025-501-17, 025-501-18, 025-501-36, 025-501-39) to make the Zoning and General Plan
Designations consistent with the historical use of three properties (APNs 025-501-17, 025-50118, and 025-501-36) and the projected use of the 35 C Street property (APN 025-501-39).
ATTACHMENT 5
In Phase 1 of this project, the District will

submit an application to remove the existing
antiquated laboratory/operations building at
410 Esplanade (025-501-17) (Figure 1), and
replace it with modern, compliant facility
that would be an addition to the Districts
existing Administrative building and extend
into APN 025-501-39. This addition would
also allow the District to improve the
universal accessibility of its laboratory/
Figure 2. The District plans to replace the industrial-style
operations facility and provide off-street
garage/shop building with a secure, enclosed parking
disabled parking in compliance with the
building that is more attractive and compatible with the
residential character of the Esplanade neighborhood.
Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). The
addition would follow the architectural style
of the current administrative building and be compatible with the residential character of
Esplanade Street.
The District Manager and VanDerWall Engineering are preparing a Request for Proposals that
will be considered by the Districts Board of Trustees at its monthly public meeting. The District
anticipates selecting and hiring an architect during summer 2013, and submitting an
Architectural Review application to the City during the second half of 2013. The District plans
to begin construction in 2014. That phase will include the construction of the Laboratory/
Operations Addition to the existing Administrative Building, ADA-compliant parking, and the
curb and gutter along Esplanade and C Street would be brought into compliance with current
requirements.
Following the replacement of the Lab/Ops facility, the District plans to improve its Todd Road
facility (located outside the City of Lakeport) and relocate its main workshop to that site, and
will store less-frequently used equipment and vehicles in a secure, covered building.
Once the Todd Road improvements are complete, the District plans to replace the present steel
garage/shop building located on APN 025-501-36 (Figure 2) with a secure, enclosed garage for
parking District vehicles (Phase 2) that would extend into APN 025-501-39. The main purpose
of this replacement structure would be to park District vehicles in a secure, enclosed structure.
The main workshop would be relocated to the Districts Todd Road facility. The Districts
regular house of operations are 7:30 AM to 4:00 PM Monday-Friday. We estimate this
construction would begin in 2017. The appearance of the replacement garage would also be
compatible with the residential character of Esplanade Street and other nearby residences.
ATTACHMENT 5
"C" STREET
LOT LINE TO BE REMOVED
A.P.N. 025-501-36
A.P.N. 25-501-39
SCALE: 1" = 20'
LOT LINE TO BE REMOVED
ESPLANADE
ST.
VanDerWall
Engineering
A.P.N. 25-501-17
A.P.N. 025-501-18
BOUNDARY NOTE:
THE BOUNDARY SHOWN IS APPROXIMATE AND BASED OFF OF
RECORD INFORMATION. THE BASIS OF BEARINGS FOR THIS
SITE PLAN IS BETWEEN 2 FOUND MONUMENTS ON THE NORTH
SIDE OF "C" STREET AS SHOWN IN 85 RS 3 & 4. ALL OTHER
BOUNDARY DATA HAS BEEN ROTATED TO THE BASIS.
ATTACHMENT 5
"C" STREET
LOT LINE TO BE
REMOVED
A.P.N. 025-501-36
A.P.N. 25-501-39
SCALE: 1" = 20'
LOT LINE TO BE
REMOVED
ESPLANADE
ST.
VanDerWall
Engineering
A.P.N. 25-501-17
A.P.N. 25-501-18
BOUNDARY NOTE:
ATTACHMENT 5
"C" STREET
A.P.N. 25-501-09
A.P.N. 25-501-40
SCALE: 1" = 20'
ESPLANADE
ST.
VanDerWall
Engineering
A.P.N. 25-501-18
R/W 247/125
BOUNDARY NOTE:
ATTACHMENT 5
LAKE COUNTY VECTOR CONTROL

PRELIMINARY PLAN
S
Wm. Vanderwall, P.E.
PROPOSED PROJECT
PHASE 1: DEMO EXISTING 2,040 SF BUILDING,
CONSTRUCT 3,330 SF BUILDING ADDITION, VAN
ACCESSIBLE HC PARKING SPACE, AND REMODEL
ENTRANCE.
LAKE COUNTY VECTOR CONTROL

PRELIMINARY PLAN
PHASE 2
(P) GARAGE/SHOP
5,830 SF
APN: 025-501-17, 18, 36 & 39

410 ESPLANADE
LAKEPORT, CA 95453
PHASE 2: DEMO EXISTING SHOP/GARAGE BUILDING,

CONSTRUCT 5,830 SF GARAGE WITH SHOP,
SIDEWALK CURB AND GUTTER ON 'C' STREET.
PHASE 1
(P) BUILDING ADDITION
3,330 SF
W
W
W
W
W
W
THIS IS NOT A RECORD OF SURVEY. THE BOUNDARY SHOWN IS

APPROXIMATE AND BASED OFF OF RECORD INFORMATION. THE
BASIS OF BEARINGS FOR THIS SITE PLAN IS BETWEEN 2 FOUND
MONUMENTS ON THE NORTH SIDE OF "C" STREET AS SHOWN IN
85 RS 3 & 4. ALL OTHER BOUNDARY DATA HAS BEEN ROTATED
TO THE BASIS.
SCALE: 1" = 10'
VanDerWall
Engineering
ATTACHMENT 6
CITY OF LAKEPORT
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
STAFF REPORT & MITIGATED NEGATIVE
DECLARATION / INITIAL STUDY
ITEM:
VI. B.
DATE:
September 25, 2014
FILE NO:
GPA 13-01 / ZC 13-01 / ER 13-01
APPLICANT & LAND

OWNER:
Lake County Vector Control District

410 Esplanade Avenue
P.O. Box 310
Lakeport, California 95453
STAFF CONTACT:
Andrew Britton
PROPOSED ACTION AND LOCATION: Applications for General Plan Amendments from
Residential and Resort Residential to Public and Civic Uses and a Zone Change from R-5 Resort
Residential to PCU Public and Civic Uses on land owned by the Lake County Vector Control
District. This staff report also incorporates the California Environmental Quality Act Initial
Study/Environmental Review of the proposed project (applications). The subject properties are
located at 408 and 410 Esplanade Street and 35 C Street and are further described as 025-50117, 18, 36, and 39 (assignment of new County Assessor Parcel Numbers is pending).
GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION AND ZONING DISTRICT: The subject properties are designated
by the City of Lakeport General Plan Land Use Map and Lakeport Zoning Ordinance as shown in
the following table. This table also includes the proposed General Plan and Zoning
designations:
APN/Address/Uses
025-501-17
Existing General
Plan Designation
Residential
Proposed General
Plan Designation
Public Civic Use
410 Esplanade
Existing Lab/Office
Existing
Zoning
PCU
Proposed
Zoning
PCU

GPA 13-01/ZC 13-01/ER 13-01
APN/Address/Uses
025-501-18
ATTACHMENT 6
Staff Report & CEQA Initial Study
Existing General
Plan Designation
Residential
Proposed General
Plan Designation
Public Civic Use
Existing
Zoning
PCU
Proposed
Zoning
PCU
Resort Residential
Public Civic Use
PCU
PCU
Resort Residential
Public Civic Use
R-5
PCU
Existing Parking Lot

on Esplanade. 410
Esplanade is address
per Assessors Office.
025-501-36
408 Esplanade
Existing Maintenance
Building (408 is
posted address, 410
per Assessors Office)
025-501-39
35 C Street Existing
Fenced Temporary
Parking Lot
The following map identifies the properties that are owned by the applicant and are the subject
of this application.

GPA 13-01/ZC 13-01/ER 13-01
ATTACHMENT 6
SITE DESCRIPTION: The subject properties are located on and/or near the Clear Lake shoreline
in the central area of the City of Lakeport. Up until the 2014 recordation of a Voluntary Merger
of three out of four of the Vector Control Districts parcels, there were 4 separate parcels
located on Esplanade and C Streets. Three of the four parcels (APNs 025-501-17, 36, and 39)
have been merged into a single parcel which is yet to be assigned a new APN by the County
Assessors Office. The fourth parcel (025-501-18) cannot be merged because it is situated
across Esplanade Street and is not contiguous with the other parcels. This report will refer to
the pre-existing Assessor Parcel Numbers (APNs) to maintain clarity and continuity.
The Lake County Vector Control District operates under the California Health and Safety Code
with an independent Board of Trustees. As stated in application materials submitted by the
District there is a long history of Vector Control District land ownership and occupancy on
Esplanade and C Streets. The Vector Control Districts land ownership totals just less than one
acre with the majority purchased in the 1950s and 1960s. The last, small parcel (APN 025-50139, 35 C Street) was acquired in 2011.
The Vector Control District site contains the existing administration and lab building on
Esplanade, the 7 car concrete parking lot across the Esplanade Street, the equipment
storage/work/maintenance building that has double frontage on both Esplanade and C Streets,
and the adjacent temporary parking lot property on C Street. The Vector Control District
Engineer has submitted plans which depict the existing buildings and site improvements (not
including lakefront walkways and docking facilities). Based on these plans there appears to be a
total of approximately 6,500 square feet of structures currently existing on the properties.
The existing land surface elevation of the Vector Control ownership is approximately 1328 feet
above sea level.
The Vector Control District land is situated in an area which is close to Clear Lake and the
administration/laboratory building site (APN 025-501-17) fronts on the Clear Lake shoreline.
There is a mix of existing land uses in the Esplanade and C Street area including the commercial
shopping center to the west; a boat and motorcycle sales and repair business to the southwest;
single family residences on Esplanade to the south; and a single family house/secondary
residential unit to the east/northeast. A dilapidated fruit sales business, City sewer pump
station and a vacant RV park exist on the north side of C Street.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The Lake County Vector Control District owns contiguous land on
Esplanade Avenue and on C Street in central Lakeport. The District has had a physical presence
and has operated out of a portion of the site since 1954 (60 years). According to information
provided by the Vector Control District, the Clear Lake waterfront location was initially selected
for an office and lab to allow staff to work with Chaoborus astictopus (the Clear Lake Gnat) in
its natural habitat, maximize their time spent working on the lake, and provide a location for
tethering the barges used to treat the lake. In 1961 the District acquired the garage/shop
property and then built a metal garage building in 1962.
In 1997 there was a new office building built on Esplanade behind the older office building. The
existing pier was rebuilt in 2009.

GPA 13-01/ZC 13-01/ER 13-01
ATTACHMENT 6
Due to the fact that there are incompatible Lakeport General Plan and Zoning designations
existing on some of the Districts land, the City has requested that the District submit the
General Plan Amendments and Zone Change applications. These actions are necessary in order
for the District to move forward with plans to expand and modernize the property. Included in
the list of City required actions is a Voluntary Merger which was completed in early 2014. This
merger of three separate parcels has resulted in a new legal description that incorporates all
three. The merged parcels are noted on the map on Page 2 of this report.
In 2009 voters in Lake County approved a benefit assessment for the Vector Control District,
establishing an enhanced tax base. The increased tax assessment provides additional capital for
the District for replacement of the antiquated laboratory, administrative offices, and physical
operations with a modern code-compliant facility.
The Vector Control District has developed a Capital Improvement Plan which includes the
purchase of land, the merger of parcels, and the replacement of the existing laboratory building
with a new efficient, safe and compliant building. This will allow the District to connect their lab
operations to the administrative operation, provide desk space for technicians, enhance
laboratory workspace, comply with safety standards for working with infectious agents and
pesticides and meet Federal ADA access requirements. The District also intends to replace
and/or reconfigure or expand the existing garage and shop building to provide secure off street
parking for vehicles and improve access to their site.
With all of the capital improvements in mind, the District has recognized that there is a need for
a clean up action to address and correct the incompatible General Plan and Zoning issues.
The Vector Control Board has made application to the City for a General Plan Amendment to
change the designations of land owned by the District and which is incompatible with existing
and proposed uses. Some of the land is designated by the City General Plan as Resort
Residential and some of it is designated as Residential. The District is requesting that the City
approve a General Plan Amendment to designate all of its land as Public and Civic Uses (PCU),
which is the appropriate type of designation for the Districts existing and future activities.
The District is also requesting a Zone Change of the 35 C Street parcel (APN 025-501-39) from R5 Resort Residential to PCU Public and Civic Uses in order to achieve consistency between the
General Plan and Zoning Ordinance.
As noted in the site description section, the applicant has completed a Voluntary Merger of
three existing parcels (APNs 025-501-17, 18, 36, and 39). The merger has been recorded and a
new APN for the newly merged parcel is pending.
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT AND ZONE CHANGE: According to the Lakeport General Plan,
the Citys land use planning document is not to remain static. California law permits up to four
General Plan Amendments per year. Most of these amendments will involve a change in land
use designation for a particular piece of property as is the case in this application. State law
requires that any decision to amend the General Plan be based on factual information with
findings of fact. These findings are the rationale for making a decision to either approve or
deny a proposed amendment.

GPA 13-01/ZC 13-01/ER 13-01
ATTACHMENT 6
The Vector Control District has submitted written information in support of the General Plan
Amendments. The District has owned land at 410 Esplanade (the parcels previously known as
APNs 025-501- 17 and 18) since 1954. This land is zoned PCU Public and Civic Uses, which is
appropriate for the existing use, but it has an incompatible General Plan designation of
Residential. The Vector Control District also has land at 408 Esplanade (APN 025-501-36) which
has been under the Districts ownership since 1962. This parcel is also zoned as PCU Public
and Civic Uses, but has an incompatible General Plan designation of Resort Residential. The
property at 35 C Street (APN 025-501-39) was purchased by the District in 2011 and is zoned R5 Resort Residential and has a General Plan designation of Resort Residential. None of the
Districts land has an appropriate Lakeport General Plan designation despite its decades-long
ownership of three of the four parcels included in these applications. Because the District has
made a decision to maintain and expand its administrative and operational facilities at the
Esplanade/C Street site, it follows that achieving compatible Lakeport General Plan and Zoning
designations in order to recognize existing uses and allow future expansion would be in the
publics interest.
Lakeport Municipal Code Section 17.32.020: General Plan Amendments.

The Lakeport General Plan may be amended by changing the boundaries, designations, or text
whenever the public convenience, necessity, or general welfare requires such an amendment.
General Plan Amendments shall comply with state law in terms of the number of amendments
approved on an annual basis. A General Plan Amendment may be initiated by the owner of real
property. The Zoning Ordinance requires the applicant to submit a General Plan Amendment
justification statement which has been provided and is incorporated herein by reference. The
following is the staff analysis of the proposed Lake County Vector Control General Plan
Amendment application.
1. The proposed General Plan Amendment is in the publics interest.
Staff Analysis: The Lake County Vector Control District is a public entity that provides services
that benefits the publics health, safety and welfare. Sixty years ago (in 1954) the Vector
Control District made a decision to acquire lakefront land on Esplanade Street within the City of
Lakeport and develop it for their administrative offices. The District also wanted to have
convenient lake access for their barge and spray equipment. The decision was logical, well
thought out and in the publics interest given the Districts initial mission to combat the Clear
Lake Gnat.
The Vector Control District has experienced a pattern of growth and expansion of their services
and responsibilities which is to be expected over time. As public agencies grow and the
demand for public services increase over time so does their need for buildings, facilities,
personnel and floor space. The District has documented the fact that there are incompatible
and inappropriate Lakeport General Plan designations existing on some of the land that they
own on Esplanade and C Streets. The proposed amendments would correct those incompatible
and inconsistent General Plan designations and make them consistent with the historic, present
and proposed uses of the applicants land.

GPA 13-01/ZC 13-01/ER 13-01
ATTACHMENT 6
2. The proposed General Plan Amendment is consistent and compatible with the entire
General Plan and any implementation programs that may be affected.
Staff Analysis: The Lakeport General Plan has been prepared in accordance with the provisions
of California law and includes all mandatory Elements as well as several discretionary Elements.
Within each of these General Plan Elements are stated purposes, discussion about existing
conditions, Goals, Objectives, Policies, Programs and responsible parties. Taken together the
General Plan language is intended to be internally consistent and compatible and to provide the
community with a clear understanding as to what the intended land use and growth pattern of
the City will be. Although it is difficult to assess if the proposed Vector Control General Plan
Amendments are fully consistent and compatible with each and every goal, objective, policy,
and program of the General Plan, there is no indication that this proposed General Plan
Amendments are inconsistent or incompatible with any components of the General Plan.
3. The potential impacts of the proposed General Plan Amendment have been assessed and
have been determined not to be detrimental to the public health, safety, and welfare.
Staff Analysis: The public in the case of a proposed General Plan Amendment means the
public at large, the whole of the community taken together. The health, safety and welfare is
about the general well-being of the City in its entirety, not just its population, but all of the
factors and things that go into the makeup of a town. The Vector Control District provides
services which benefit the public; however, perhaps the biggest concern for City staff is the
reference made by the Vector Control District with respect to working with infectious agents
and pesticides. Its acknowledged that the District currently works with these types of
materials at their existing facility, but its also important to note that dealing with pesticide
storage or working with agents could potentially impact the community at large. The
handling/use of these potentially hazardous materials requires best management practices and
redundant safety approaches in order to safeguard nearby populations.
In light of these concerns, the Vector Control Districts Manager and Research Director recently
(9/25/14) sent an email to the City describing the Districts activities regarding the storage and
use of pesticides and other potentially hazardous materials. The email states that the District
does not store pesticides at the Esplanade facility, but at another facility that is outside the city
limits. There are incidental small quantities of pesticide in locked containers on the Districts
trucks that are parked inside the locked garage on Esplanade. The District uses small amounts
of various lab chemicals (mainly isopropyl {rubbing} alcohol, ethanol, acetone, and various
products used for water quality assays) at this site, but purchases these in small, consumable
quantities (typically less than a pint).
According to the District, the total amount of pesticides and chemicals on the Esplanade
properties is below the reporting thresholds required for a Hazardous Materials Business Plan
(HMBP). Furthermore, all of the Districts lab and operations employees are state-certified in
pesticide handling and application procedures, receive annual pesticide safety training and
complete 36 hours of continuing education every 24 months to maintain their certifications.
The email also indicates that the Districts work with infectious agents consists of collecting
mosquitoes, dead birds, and ticks that are sent to state laboratories for testing. The Districts
6

GPA 13-01/ZC 13-01/ER 13-01
ATTACHMENT 6
operations are regulated by California Department of Public HealthVectorborne Disease

Section (CDPH-VBDS), which inspects our facilities and records; the Lake County Ag
Commissioner, who reviews our pesticide applications, application records, pesticide safety,
application equipment, and pesticide storage; and Lake County Environmental Health, which
inspects their facilities for compliance with the HMBP.
The following Initial Study addresses these concerns and includes two recommended mitigation
measures that call for the applicant to provide documentation which certifies the Districts
laboratory facilities, protocols and procedures; requires the District to adhere to all appropriate
safety protocols related to pesticide handling procedures and infectious agent research; and to
maintain all required laboratory certifications. This documentation will factually represent that
these concerns are mitigated to a safe level.
The proposed General Plan Amendments, along with the requested Zone Change, will allow the
district to complete upgrades and enhancements of existing laboratory facilities, which will
presumably enhance safety of their personnel and the public at large.
The City has also has concerns about public parking impacts associated with the Districts
operations. Amendment of the General Plan will facilitate the Districts future development of
the subject property consistent with preliminary plans that have been submitted to the City.
While this is to be expected, there are potential parking safety impacts that may result
problems for the traveling public and nearby residents due to the narrow width of Esplanade
Street and lack of adequate off-street employee and customer parking. Staff believes that a
comprehensive approach and design solution will be needed to address the parking issue. Staff
has analyzed the demand for parking by essentially observing what occurs at the existing Vector
Control office. Simply put, there is a shortage of parking existing now at the Vector Control
Office and related equipment/vehicle storage facility which leads to periodic traffic and parking
congestion in the vicinity. There is a small seven-car parking lot off of Esplanade Street across
from the Vector Control facilities (APN 025-501-18) that at times can handle the parking
demand. However, based on staffs observations, there is not enough parking during times of
peak usage. Staff has noted that the applicants service vehicles are sometimes parked on the
public sidewalk, thereby restricting pedestrian access.
This existing parking situation combined with the fact that the District is proposing future
additional building area, thus adding to the demand for parking, will result in potential impact
that has the potential to be detrimental to the health, safety and welfare of the general public
in this part of Lakeport. In conjunction with future land use/development applications, the
District should provide a parking analysis which evaluates and quantifies the demand for
parking (both existing and long term) and provides for a long term design and development
solution for the provision of public and employee parking and for official vehicle parking. This
implies the need for development of additional off street parking facilities, long term shared
functional parking agreements with neighboring property owners, payment of substantial inlieu-of parking fees, and/or redesign of the proposed expansion project to reduce the amount
of square footage and resulting parking demand to ensure the District provides an adequate
amount of off-street parking.

GPA 13-01/ZC 13-01/ER 13-01
ATTACHMENT 6
One logical partial solution is to require that the majority (four spaces) of the Districts small
off-street parking lot (APN 025-501-18) be reserved for the publics use and the remainder for
District employees. All other employees should be required to park on site in or near the
proposed new maintenance building or in the nearby shopping center parking lot via a shared
parking agreement. Although the existing small parking lot requires vehicles to back into the
right-of-way, this is mitigated by the relatively low traffic volumes and slow speed on
Esplanade.
For the purpose of this report and the proposed General Plan Amendments (and Zone Change),
staff has recommended a mitigation measure that references the applicants future
development project and establishes the requirement for at least 16 off-street parking spaces
for the public and District personnel. The mitigation measure is set forth in the conclusion of
this Initial Study. A related mitigation measure calls for the applicant to submit a parking
analysis in conjunction with future project phases. The mitigation measure notes that the
suggested number of off-street parking spaces may be modified based on the
findings/conclusions of the applicants parking analysis.
It is important to acknowledge that the proposed General Plan Amendment affecting APN 025501-39 (35 C Street)from Resort Residential to Public and Civic Usesappears to be in the
publics interest and consistent with the Citys General Plan because the sites limited size (43
wide x 100.5 deep) realistically precludes its development consistent with its existing land use
designation. The parcel is too small to accommodate a high density residential project and
does not have frontage on Clear Lake like most lands that have a Resort Residential General
Plan land use designation.
4. The proposed General Plan Amendment has been processed in accordance with the
applicable provisions of the California Government Code and the California Environmental
Quality Act.
Staff Analysis: Lakeport City staff has prepared an Initial Study (IS) Environmental Review in
accordance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The CEQA IS
is incorporated into this staff report along with suggested mitigation measures. The IS has
identified potentially significant environmental impacts associated with the proposed General
Plan Amendments (and Zone Change) and recommended mitigation measures which when
implemented will reduce and eliminate the identified impacts to a less than significant level.
Lakeport Municipal Code Section 17.32.010: Zoning Amendments

An application for an amendment to the Zoning Ordinance shall include a justification
statement such as the statement submitted by the applicant and incorporated herein by
reference. The justification statement must describe the intended amendment, whether it is a
change in district boundaries, or an amendment of the zoning ordinance text. The justification
statement shall give the reasons why the amendment is necessary and shall provide
information documenting that:
1. The proposed amendment is in the publics interest.

GPA 13-01/ZC 13-01/ER 13-01
ATTACHMENT 6
Staff Analysis: As described, the Lake County Vector Control District is a public entity which
performs a variety of services that benefit the publics health, safety and welfare. The Vector
Control District has experienced a pattern of growth and expansion of their services and
responsibilities since the initiation of their activities at this site in 1954. As public agencies grow
and the demand for public services increase over time so too does the need for facilities and
space and this is the case for Vector Control.
The Vector Control District has documented the fact that there is an incompatible and
inappropriate Zoning designation existing on the land that they own at 35 C Street (APN 025501-39). The proposed Zone Change from R-5 Resort Residential to PCU Public and Civic Uses
that the District has applied for would correct this incompatible and inconsistent Zoning
designation and make it consistent with the intended Lakeport General Plan designation
described in the previous section of this report.
2. The proposed amendment is consistent with the Lakeport General Plan.
Staff Analysis: As previously described, the Lakeport General Plan was prepared in accordance
with the provisions of California law. The Zoning Amendment proposed by the applicant
affecting 35 C Street (APN 025-501-39) is consistent and compatible with the proposed General
Plan Designation of Public and Civic Uses along with other applicable goals, objectives, policies,
and programs of the General Plan. The sites limited size (43 wide x 100.5 deep) realistically
precludes its development consistent with its existing R-5 High Density Residential/Resort
zoning. The parcel is too small to accommodate a high density residential project and does not
have frontage on Clear Lake like most lands that have the R-5 zoning designation.
It is important to note that the other District-owned property at this site is properly zoned
(PCU) at this time.
3. The proposed amendment will not be detrimental to the communitys health, safety, and
welfare.
Staff Analysis: As stated in the General Plan Amendment section above, the biggest concern for
City staff is the reference made by the Vector Control District to working with infectious agents
and pesticides. Pesticide use and working with infectious agents have the potential to impact
the community at large and requires best management practices and redundant safety
approaches in order to safeguard nearby populations. Staff has developed two recommended
mitigation measures that call for the applicant to provide documentation which certifies the
Districts laboratory facilities, protocols and procedures; requires the District to adhere to all
appropriate safety protocols related to pesticide handling procedures and infectious agent
research; and to maintain all required laboratory certifications.
Amendment of the Zoning designation for the area encompassed by APN 025-501-39/35 C
Street will facilitate the future development projects described by the applicant. As noted in
the General Plan Amendment analysis, the City has a concern about vehicle parking related to
the Vector Control operations. Staff has recommended a mitigation measure that references
the applicants future development projects and establishes the requirement for at least 16 offstreet parking spaces for the public and District personnel. The mitigation measure is set forth
in the conclusion of this Initial Study. Additional analysis of the parking impacts associated with

GPA 13-01/ZC 13-01/ER 13-01
ATTACHMENT 6
the applicants pending development projects will be completed in the future in conjunction
with new development applications. The applicant will be encouraged to provide a formal
parking analysis to evaluate and quantify the demand for parking and provides for a long term
design and development solution for the provision of public and employee parking and for
official vehicle parking.
4. The proposed amendment complies with the California Government Code and California
Environmental Quality Act.
Staff Analysis: Lakeport City staff has prepared an Initial Study (IS) in accordance with the
provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The CEQA IS is incorporated into
this staff report along with proposed mitigation measures. The IS has identified potentially
significant environmental impacts associated with the proposed Zoning Amendment and
recommended mitigation measures which when implemented will reduce and eliminate those
identified impacts to a less than significant level.
INITIAL STUDY AND ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The application for Amendment of the City of Lakeport General Plan and Zone Change is subject
to the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act, Title 17 of the City of Lakeport
Municipal Code, and City Council Resolution No. 1160, all of which deal with environmental
review procedures.
The following Initial Study identifies potentially significant impacts associated with the
proposed General Plan and Zone Change actions and suggests mitigation measures which will
reduce the identified impacts to a less than significant level.
ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED
The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by the project, involving at least
one impact that is a Potentially Significant Impact or Less Than Significant with Mitigation
Incorporation as indicated by the checklist on the following pages.
AESTHETICS
AGRICULTURAL AND
FORESTRY
RESOURCES
AIR QUALITY
BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES
CULTURAL RESOURCES
GEOLOGY / SOILS
GREENHOUSE GAS
EMISSIONS
HAZARDS & HAZARDOUS

MATERIALS
HYDROLOGY / WATER
QUALITY
LAND USE / PLANNING
MINERAL RESOURCES
NOISE
POPULATION / HOUSING
PUBLIC SERVICES
RECREATION
TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC
UTILITIES / SERVICE
SYSTEMS
MANDATORY FINDINGS OF
SIGNIFICANCE
10

GPA 13-01/ZC 13-01/ER 13-01
ATTACHMENT 6
Determination
On the basis of the initial evaluation that follows:
I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment,
and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the
environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the
project have been made by or agreed to by the project proponent. A MITIGATED
NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required.
I find that the proposed project MAY have a potentially significant impact or
potentially significant unless mitigated impact on the environment, but at least one
effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable
legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier
analysis as described on attached sheets. A TIERED ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is
required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed.
I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the
environment, because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately
in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and (b)
have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION,
including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project,
no further environmental document is required. FINDINGS consistent with this
determination will be prepared.
Andrew Britton, Planning Services Manager
Signature
September 25, 2014

Date
I. AESTHETICS: The proposed amendments of the Lakeport General Plan and Rezoning of land
under the Lakeport Zoning Ordinance will not result in direct aesthetic impacts. Potential
aesthetic impacts beyond the scope of the CEQA checklist will be addressed in subsequent
project submittals.
Would the project:
Potentially
Significant
Impact
a)
Have a substantial adverse effect on
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporation
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
11

GPA 13-01/ZC 13-01/ER 13-01
ATTACHMENT 6
Potentially
Significant
Impact
b)
c)
d)
a scenic vista?
Substantially damage scenic
resources, including, but not limited
to, trees, rock outcroppings, and
historic buildings within a state
scenic highway?
Substantially degrade the existing
visual character or quality of the
site and its surroundings?
Create a new source of substantial
light or glare which would adversely
affect day or nighttime views in the
area?
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporation
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
Response I a): The proposed General Plan Amendments and Zone Change and future site
improvements will not have a substantial adverse effect on established scenic vistas. Figure 16
of the City of Lakeport General Plan (Conservation, Open Space, Parks and Recreation Element)
details environmentally sensitive areas, including view corridors. No view corridors exist in the
vicinity of the project. The nearest view corridor extends east from Library Park in the vicinity
of Second Street approximately 1,000 feet northeast of the project site. There is no impact.
Response I b): The project will not substantially damage scenic resources within a state scenic
highway. No highways are in close proximity to the subject property. There is no impact.
Response I c): The proposed project will not substantially degrade the existing visual character
or quality of the site and its surroundings. There is no impact.
Response I d): With respect to the potential creation of substantial light and glare that would
adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area, in conjunction with the future construction
of site improvements, the applicant will be required to submit details regarding lighting
specifications and a photometric plan which illustrates the amount of light that will be directed
to the subject property.
Future exterior lighting will need to be shielded and down lit to prevent impacts to the adjacent
parcels or any of the surrounding streets. This potential impact is considered to be less than
significant at this time.
The future improvements planned for the site must also mitigate aesthetic impacts associated
with the heating, cooling and ventilation systems by providing screens around mechanical
equipment and locating them away from adjacent residences.
All above-ground propane tanks and the trash/recycling bins associated with future
development projects must also be provided with appropriately designed screened enclosures.
12

GPA 13-01/ZC 13-01/ER 13-01
ATTACHMENT 6
The potential aesthetic impacts described above with be addressed in detail in conjunction with
the review of future development proposals. As such, potential impacts are considered to be
less than significant.
II. AGRICULTURE AND FOREST RESOURCES:
In determining whether impact to agricultural resources are significant environmental effects,
lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment
Model (1997) prepared by the California Department of Conservation as an optional model to
use in assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland. In determining whether impact to forest
resources, including timberland are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer
to information compiled by the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection regarding
the states inventory of forest land, including the Forest and Range Assessment Project and the
Forest Legacy Assessment project; and forest carbon measurement methodology provided in
Forest Protocols adopted by the California Air Resources Board.
Would the project:
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Convert Prime Farmland, Unique

Farmland, or Farmland of
Statewide Importance
(Farmland), as shown on the
maps prepared pursuant to the
Farmland Mapping and
Monitoring Program of the
California Resources Agency, to
non-agricultural use?
b) Conflict with existing zoning for
agricultural use, or a Williamson
Act contract?
c) Conflict with existing zoning for,
or cause rezoning of, forest land
(as defined in Public Resources
Code section 12220(g)),
timberland (as defined by Public
Resources Code section 4526), or
timberland zoned Timberland
Production (as defined by
Government Code section
51104(g))?
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporation
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
a)
13

GPA 13-01/ZC 13-01/ER 13-01
ATTACHMENT 6
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporation
Less Than
Significant
Impact
Result in the loss of forest land or

conversion of forest land to nonforest use?
e) Involve other changes in the
existing environment which, due
to their location or nature, could
result in conversion of Farmland
to non-agricultural use or
conversion of forest land to nonforest use?
No
Impact
d)
Response II a): Staff reviewed the State of California Important Farmland Map for Lake County
and visited the web site for the State of California Department of Conservation, Division of Land
Resource Protection (ftp://ftp.consrv.ca.gov/pub/dlrp/FMMP/pdf/2006/lak06.pdf), and found
that the subject property is not considered to be prime farmland, unique farmland or farmland
of statewide importance. The project site is located in an urban/built-up area according to the
Important Farmland Map. The proposal will not result in the conversion of prime farmland to
non-agricultural use. There is no impact.
Response II b): The site is not zoned for agricultural uses and City and County records indicate
that it is not subject to a Williamson Act contract. There is no impact.
Response II c), d): The site is not zoned for forest uses or timberland and the project will not
result in the loss or conversion of existing forest land. No impact is anticipated.
Response II e): There are no aspects of the project that would result in the conversion of
farmland to a non-agricultural use or the conversion of forest land to non-forest use. There is
no impact.
III. AIR QUALITY:
Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management
or air pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following determinations.
Would the project:
Potentially
Significant
Impact
a)
Conflict with or obstruct

implementation of the applicable
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporation
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
14

GPA 13-01/ZC 13-01/ER 13-01
Potentially
Significant
Impact
b)
c)
d)
e)
ATTACHMENT 6
air quality plan?

Violate any air quality standard or
contribute substantially to an
existing or projected air quality
violation?
Result in a cumulatively
considerable net increase of any
criteria pollutant for which the
project region is non-attainment
under an applicable federal or state
ambient air quality standard
(including releasing emissions which
exceed quantitative thresholds for
ozone precursors)?
Expose sensitive receptors to
substantial pollutant
concentrations?
Create objectionable odors
affecting a substantial number of
people?
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporation
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
Response III a): Notice of the future construction activities will be provided to the Lake County
Air Quality Management District (LCAQMD). The proposed General Plan Amendments and Zone
Change project will conflict with or obstruct the implementation of the Countys air quality
program. There is no impact.
Response III b): The future construction of site improvements may result in temporary localized
increases in particulate air pollution related to earthmoving, hauling, trenching, demolition, and
other construction activities. Construction activities also result in pollutant emissions from the
operation of gasoline and diesel powered equipment.
The LCAQMD typically submits comments that require normal precautions to be taken during
site preparation and construction to prevent dust, such as watering and use of palliatives, no
burning of vegetative wastes, and managed heavy equipment idling. The parcel is not located
in a mapped serpentine area. Applicant will be required to provide adequate dust controls
during future construction periods. If not adequately controlled or complaints arise, a dust
management plan may be required. Roads and parking lots should be paved, as is outlined in
the applicants proposal.
The General Plan Amendments and Zone Change affecting APN 025-501-39 (35 C Street) will
recognize the current use of this property as a temporary parking lot. The future
15

GPA 13-01/ZC 13-01/ER 13-01
ATTACHMENT 6
development of the site will include the construction of a large service building according to the
applicants preliminary development plans. The parking lot is currently covered by road base
material which has effectively limited any notable dust-generation problems. However, staff
has suggested a mitigation measure that requires the temporary/interim parking area to be
maintained with an adequate amount of road base. The suggested mitigation also addresses
keeping the C Street right-of-way clear of any gravel/debris related to the interim parking lot.
Certain air quality impacts associated with the General Plan Amendments and Zone Change
applications are less than significant with mitigation incorporation. See conclusion of report
for recommended mitigation measure related to minimizing the generation of dust and other
potential air quality issues. Additional air quality mitigation measures will likely be imposed in
conjunction with the future development activities.
Response III c): The General Plan Amendments will not directly result in a cumulatively
considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant not currently in attainment. The Lake County
region is currently under attainment levels for all criteria pollutants. There is no impact.
Response III d, e): Approval of the General Plan Amendments and Rezoning project and the
subsequent construction of expanded office/maintenance facilities are not expected to expose
sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations or result in the creation of
objectionable odors. Sensitive receptors in the City of Lakeport include residences, schools,
parks, medical offices and convalescent homes. The nearby residential area to the east of the
site may be considered a sensitive receptor.
The future project may result in an increase in traffic volumes and related vehicle emissions in
the area. The potential increase in emissions associated with the future project is not expected
to detrimentally affect the existing air quality in the area. Additional mitigation measures will
be considered in conjunction future projects at this site.
Air quality impacts associated with these two CEQA checklist items are considered to be less
than significant at this time.
IV. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES:
Would the project:
Potentially
Significant
Impact
a)
Have a substantial adverse effect,

either directly or through habitat
modifications, on any species
identified
as a
candidate,
sensitive, or special status species
in local or regional plans, policies,
or regulations, or by the California
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporation
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
16

GPA 13-01/ZC 13-01/ER 13-01
ATTACHMENT 6
Potentially
Significant
Impact
b)
c)
d)
e)
f)
Department of Fish and Game or

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service?
Have a substantial adverse effect
on any riparian habitat or other
sensitive natural community
identified in local or regional
plans, policies, regulations or by
the California Department of Fish
and Game or US Fish and Wildlife
Service?
Have a substantial adverse effect
on federally protected wetlands
as defined by Section 404 of the
Clean Water Act (including, but
not limited to, marsh, vernal pool,
coastal, etc.) through direct
removal, filling, hydrological
interruption, or other means?
Interfere substantially with the
movement of any native resident
or migratory fish or wildlife
species or with established native
resident or migratory wildlife
corridors, or impede the use of
native wildlife nursery sites?
Conflict with any local policies or
ordinances protecting biological
resources, such as a tree
preservation policy or ordinance?
Conflict with the provisions of an
adopted Habitat Conservation
Plan,
Natural
Community
Conservation Plan, or other
approved local, regional, or state
habitat conservation plan?
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporation
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
REGULATORY SETTING
Federal Endangered Species Act
17

GPA 13-01/ZC 13-01/ER 13-01
ATTACHMENT 6
The Federal Endangered Species Act (FESA) defines an endangered species as any species or
subspecies that is in danger of extinction throughout all or a significant portion of its range. A
threatened species is defined as any species or subspecies that is likely to become an
endangered species within the foreseeable future throughout all or a significant portion of its
range.
Once a species is listed it is fully protected from a take unless a take permit is issued by the
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). A take is defined as the killing, capturing, or harassing of
a species. Proposed endangered or threatened species are those species for which a proposed
regulation, but not final rule, has been published in the Federal Register.
Migratory Bird Treaty Act
To kill, possess, or trade a migratory bird, bird part, nest, or egg is a violation of the Federal
Migratory Bird Treaty Act (FMBTA: 16 U.S.C., 703, Supp. I, 1989), unless it is in accordance
with the regulations that have been set forth by the Secretary of the Interior.
Clean Water Act Section 404
Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA) regulates all discharges of dredged or fill material
into waters of the United States. The United States Army Corps of Engineers is the agency
responsible for administering the permit process for activities that affect waters of the United
States. Executive Order 11990 is a federal implementation policy, which is intended to result in
no net loss of wetlands.
Natural drainage channels and wetlands are considered Waters of the United States
(hereafter referred to as jurisdictional waters). The extent of jurisdiction within drainage
channels is defined by ordinary high water marks on opposing channel banks. Wetlands are
habitats with soils that are intermittently or permanently saturated, or inundated. The
resulting anaerobic conditions select for plant species known as hydrophytes, which show a
high degree of fidelity to such soils. Wetlands are identified by the presence of hydrophyte
vegetation, hydric soils (soils saturated intermittently or permanently saturated by water), and
wetland hydrology according to methodologies outlined in the 1987 Corps of Engineers
Wetlands Delineation Manual (USACE 1987).
Clean Water Act Section 401
Section 401 of the Clean Water Act (CWA) requires an applicant who is seeking a 404 permit to
first obtain a water quality certification from the Regional Water Quality Control Board. To
obtain the water quality certification the Regional Water Quality Control Board must indicate
that the proposed fill would be consistent with the standards set forth by the state.
Fish and Game Code 2050-2097 - California Endangered Species Act
The California Endangered Species Act (CESA) protects certain plant and animal species when
they are of special ecological, educational, historical, recreational, aesthetic, economic, and
scientific value to the people of the State. CESA established that it is the States policy to
conserve, protect, restore, and enhance endangered species and their habitats.
The CESA expanded upon the original Native Plant Protection Act and enhanced legal
protection for plants. To be consistent with Federal regulations, CESA created the categories of
18

GPA 13-01/ZC 13-01/ER 13-01
ATTACHMENT 6
"threatened" and "endangered" species. It converted all "rare" animals into the Act as
threatened species, but did not do so for rare plants. Thus, there are three listing categories for
plants in California: rare, threatened, and endangered. Under State law, plant and animal
species may be formally designated by official listing by the California Fish and Game
Commission.
Fish and Game Code 1900-1913 - California Native Plant Protection Act
In 1977, the State Legislature passed the Native Plant Protection Act (NPPA) in recognition of
rare and endangered plants of the state. The NPPA gave the California Fish and Game
Commission the power to designate native plants as endangered or rare, and to require permits
for collecting, transporting, or selling such plants.
Public Resources Code 21083.4 - Oak Woodlands Conservation
In 2004, the California legislature enacted SB 1334, which added oak woodland conservation
regulations to the Public Resources Code. This law requires a County to determine whether a
project within its jurisdiction may result in a conversion of oak woodlands that will have a
significant effect on the environment. If a County determines that there may be a significant
effect to oak woodlands, the County must require oak woodlands mitigation alternatives to
mitigate the significant effect of the conversion of oak woodlands. Such mitigation alternatives
includes: conservation through the use of conservation easements; planting and maintaining
and appropriate number of replacement of trees; contribution of funds to the Oak Woodlands
Conservation Fund for the purpose of purchasing oak woodlands conservation easements;
and/or other mitigation measures developed by the County.
Public Resources Code 21000 - California Environmental Quality Act
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) identifies that a species that is not listed on
the federal or state endangered species list may be considered rare or endangered if the
species meets certain criteria. Under CEQA, public agencies must determine if a project would
adversely affect a species that is not protected by FESA or CESA. Species that are not listed
under FESA or CESA, but are otherwise eligible for listing (i.e. candidate, or proposed) may be
protected by the local government until the opportunity to list the species arises for the
responsible agency (i.e. USFWS or CDFG).
Fish and Game Code 3503, 3503.5, 3800 - Predatory Birds
Under the California Fish and Game Code, all predatory birds in California, generally called
raptors, are protected. The law indicates that it is unlawful to take, possess, or destroy the
nest or eggs of any such bird unless it is in accordance with the code. Any activity that would
cause a nest to be abandoned or cause a reduction or loss in a reproductive effort is considered
a take. This generally includes construction activities.
Fish and Game Code 1601-1603 Streambed Alteration
Under the California Fish and Game Code, the Department of Fish and Game (CDFG) has
jurisdiction over any proposed activities that would divert or obstruct the natural flow or
change the bed, channel, or bank of any lake or stream. Private landowners or project
developers must obtain a Streambed Alteration Agreement from the CDFG prior to any
19

GPA 13-01/ZC 13-01/ER 13-01
ATTACHMENT 6
alteration of a lake bed, stream channel, or their banks. Through this agreement, the CDFG
may impose conditions to limit and fully mitigate impacts on fish and wildlife resources.
Environmental Setting
The City of Lakeport is located within the ecoregion known as the Northern California Interior
Coast Ranges. Northern California Interior Coast Ranges vegetation is predominately
characterized by the Blue Oak series, Chemise series, Purple needle grass series, and Foothill
pine series (General Plan EIR, 2008). The vegetation within these plant communities vary
greatly and are generally influenced by several ecological factors, including the amount of
water available, soil depth and chemistry, slope and aspect (angle of the terrain with regard to
direct sunlight), and climate.
The following habitat types are found within the City of Lakeport: shoreline, riparian, oak
woodlands, chaparral, agricultural lands, and urban areas. There are several special-status
plant and animal species known to occur in the vicinity of the City, however, the City is not
located within an identified migratory corridor.
There are numerous policies and measures included in the Conservation Element of the 2009
General Plan that serve to protect and preserve important natural and biological resources
(pages VII-9 through VII-10 of the 2009 Lakeport General Plan). The above-referenced policies
include requirements limiting the amount of ground disturbance during construction activities.
The Lakeport 2009 General Plan EIR includes detailed descriptions of potential special-status
plant, fish, and wildlife species, habitat types, sensitive communities, and wildlife corridors
affecting the Lakeport area.
Response IV a): The applicant has not submitted a biological assessment.
The proposed General Plan Amendments and Zone Change will not directly result in any
substantial adverse effects on candidate, sensitive, or special status species and the future
development of the site will be subject to additional environmental analysis. There is no
impact associated with this issue.
Response IV b): There are no impacts to the riparian habitat on the site as there are no
proposed improvements planned for the site that are lakeward of the existing Vector Control
building. As such, no mitigation is necessary.
Response IV c): The General Plan Amendments and Zone Change will not result in the
discharge of dredged or fill material within waters of the United States. Based on this
determination there will be no impact to wetland resources.
Response IV d): Approval of the proposed General Plan Amendments and Zone Change project
will not directly result in substantial adverse impacts to movement of native resident or
migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife
corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites. The subject property is in an
urban/built-up area and there is minimal fish and wildlife species existing on the sire. Some
wildlife, including fish, amphibians, small mammals and birds may be present in and along the
lakefront, but this area is not proposed for construction. There is no impact.
20

GPA 13-01/ZC 13-01/ER 13-01
ATTACHMENT 6
Response IV e): Approval of the General Plan Amendments and Zone Change proposal and the
subsequent development of the property and related site improvements will not directly result
in any conflicts with local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources. No native trees
will be impacted as a result of the project and the site improvements will be provided with an
adequate setback from Clear Lake. There is no impact.
Response IV f): There are no applicable Habitat Conservation Plans, Natural Community
Conservation Plans, or any other local, regional, or state conservation plans affecting the
subject property. There is no impact.
V. CULTURAL RESOURCES:
Would the project:
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Cause a substantial adverse

change in the significance of a
historical resource as defined in
15064.5?
b) Cause a substantial adverse
change in the significance of an
archaeological resource pursuant
to 15064.5?
c) Directly or indirectly destroy a
unique paleontological resource
or site or unique geologic
feature?
d) Disturb any human remains,
including those interred outside
of formal cemeteries?
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporation
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
a)
Responses V a), b), c), d): Section 15064.5 of the CEQA Guidelines discusses historical
resources and indicates that the term historical resources shall include the following:
A resource listed in, or determined to be eligible by the State Historical Resources

Commission, for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources (Public Resource
Code SS 5024.1, Title 14 CCR, Section 4850 et seq.).
A resource included in a local register of historical resources, as defined in section

5020.1(k) of the Public Resources Code or identified as significant in an historical
resource survey meeting the requirements section 5024.1(g) of the Public Resources
Code, shall be presumed to be historically or culturally significant. Public agencies must
treat any such resource as significant unless the preponderance of evidence
21

GPA 13-01/ZC 13-01/ER 13-01
ATTACHMENT 6
demonstrates that it is not historically or culturally significant.
Any object, building, structure, site, area, place, record, or manuscript which a lead
agency determines to be historically significant or significant in the architectural,
engineering, scientific, economic, agricultural, educational, social, political, military, or
cultural annals of California may be considered to be an historical resource, provided the
lead agency's determination is supported by substantial evidence in light of the whole
record. Generally, a resource shall be considered by the lead agency to be "historically
significant" if the resource meets the criteria for listing on the California Register of
Historical Resources (Pub. Res. Code SS5024.1, Title 14 CCR, Section 4852).
This section of CEQA also includes additional criteria that can be used to determine if a building,
site, area, etc. is a historical resource.
Because there are no buildings or other site development proposed at this time, a Request for
Review has not been sent to the California Historical Resources Information System (CHRIS) at
Sonoma State University. Prior to the commencement of future project construction activities,
a qualified archeologist will likely be required to conduct a formal site evaluation. There is no
impact related to this issue associated with the proposed actions.
VI. GEOLOGY AND SOILS:
Would the project:
Potentially
Significant
Impact
a) Expose people or structures to

potential substantial adverse effects,
including the risk of loss, injury, or
death involving:
i) Rupture of a known earthquake
fault, as delineated on the most
recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake
Fault Zoning Map issued by the
State Geologist for the area or
based on other substantial
evidence of a known fault? Refer
to Division of Mines and Geology
Special Publication 42.
ii) Strong seismic ground shaking?
iii) Seismic-related ground failure,
including liquefaction?
iv) Landslides?
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporation
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
X
X
X
22

GPA 13-01/ZC 13-01/ER 13-01
ATTACHMENT 6
Potentially
Significant
Impact
b) Result in substantial soil erosion or

the loss of topsoil?
c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil
that is unstable, or that would
become unstable as a result of the
project, and potentially result in onor
off-site
landslide,
lateral
spreading, subsidence, liquefaction
or collapse?
d) Be located on expansive soil, as
defined in Table 18-1-B of the
Uniform Building Code (1994),
creating substantial risks to life or
property?
e) Have soils incapable of adequately
supporting the use of septic tanks or
alternative waste water disposal
systems where sewers are not
available for the disposal of waste
water?
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporation
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
Response VI a.i, ii, iii): The Fault-Rupture Hazard Zones map prepared by the California
Geological Survey for the Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Act identifies Alquist-Priolo
zones in the northern and southern sections of Lake County, but none in the City of Lakeport.
This map is incorporated into the Citys General Plan (Figure 17, Safety Element).
The General Plan describes the seismic hazards in the vicinity of Lakeport and indicates that the
City is located in a highly active earthquake area and the potential exists for a significant
seismic event in the future.1
Active earthquake faults are defined as those for which there is evidence of activity during
the last 11,000 years, or Holocene time. Active faults in our area include the Mayacama, about
seven miles southeast of Lakeport, and the Konocti Bay, nine miles to the east. The Healdsburg
and San Andreas faults lie 24 and 35 miles to the southwest. Faults near Lakeport, categorized
as potentially active, include the Collayomi, nine miles southwest; the Barlett Springs,
approximately 20 miles east; and the Big Valley, running along the west Shore of Clear Lake.
Immediately east of the site, between the City limits and Clear Lake, there is a potentially active
fault rupture zone. Potentially active rupture zones are faults which have been active in the
1
Lakeport General Plan, Safety Element, Pg. X-1
23

GPA 13-01/ZC 13-01/ER 13-01
ATTACHMENT 6
past 2,000 years. Little is known about this shoreline fault rupture zone; however, it represents
a potential significant hazard and must be taken into consideration when development occurs
in the vicinity. 2
The subject property is in relatively close proximity to the potentially active fault rupture zone
along the Clear Lake shoreline.
The applicant has not submitted a preliminary geotechnical investigation prepared by a licensed
geotechnical engineer. This type of study will be required in conjunction with future site
development proposals. Recommendations will be incorporated as future mitigation measures
imposed during the formal review of future development projects.
There are no impacts identified related to the potential rupture of a known earthquake fault,
strong seismic ground shaking, or seismic-related ground failure associated with the proposed
General Plan Amendments and Zone Change as no development is proposed and there will be
no intensification of existing uses.
Response VI a. iv): No potential adverse effects related to landsides are anticipated as a result
of the project. There is no impact.
Response VI b), c): Future construction may require removal of fill and near surface soils below
existing grade and replacing with structural fill to provide uniform bearing soils for the
proposed building foundation. However, there is no indication that the development of the
proposed future projects will result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil. Significant
topographic changes are unlikely due to the sites relatively flat surface. Erosion control
measures will be required during the construction and post-construction periods due to storm
water mitigation requirements. New development is subject to the requirements of the Citys
erosion control regulations (Municipal Code Ch. 17.20), Storm Water Management Ordinance
(Municipal Code Ch. 8.40) and the Lake County Clean Water Programs Storm Water
Management Plan. Best Management Practices (BMPs) will be required to limit soil erosion
associated with the construction and post-construction activities. Potential issues related to
future site drainage and erosion control facilities are further addressed in the Hydrology and
Water Quality section of this initial study.
No impact has been identified at this time for the proposed General Plan Amendments and
Zone Change.
Response VI d): The possibility of the presence of the expansive soils is one of the biggest
concerns associated with construction in Lakeport and future grading and foundation plans
must incorporate a geotechnical analysis and related recommendations. A geotechnical
engineer must review the final grading and foundation plans to ensure conformance with the
reports the soil report recommendations.
No impacts related to expansive soils have been identified at this time. Appropriate mitigation
measures will be imposed in conjunction with future development proposals.
Ibid.
24

GPA 13-01/ZC 13-01/ER 13-01
ATTACHMENT 6
Response VI e): Adequacy of the sites soils to support septic tanks or other alternative waste
water disposal systems is not applicable as the Citys sewer system currently serves the project
site. No septic tanks are proposed in conjunction with this project. There is no impact.
VII. GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS:
Would the project:
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Generate greenhouse gas emissions,

either directly or indirectly, that may
have a significant impact on the
environment?
b) Conflict with an applicable plan,
policy or regulation adopted for the
purpose of reducing the emissions of
greenhouse gases?
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporation
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
a)
Response VII a): The Lake County Air Quality Management District has not yet reviewed the
future expansion project or submitted comments related to greenhouse gas emissions.
However the subsequent environmental review required for future projects will be routed to
the District. In applications involving proposed construction, the District typically indicates that
development projects may result in an increase in the amount of vehicle traffic related to
employees, customers, deliveries. The relatively small size of the future project will likely limit
the related impacts to a less than significant level provided some mitigation measures are
incorporated into the project such as:
Promotion of carpooling, local transit, or alternate means of transportation for
employees and walking traffic should be promoted.
These potential impacts will be addresses fully in conjunction with future projects. No impact is
identified at this time.
Response VII b): There is no indication that the proposed General Plan Amendments and
Rezoning project will conflict with any plan, policy or regulation related to the reduction of
greenhouse gas emissions. There is no impact.
VIII. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS:
Would the project:
25

GPA 13-01/ZC 13-01/ER 13-01
ATTACHMENT 6
Potentially
Significant
Impact
a) Create a significant hazard to the

public or the environment through
the routine transport, use, or
disposal of hazardous materials?
b) Create a significant hazard to the
public or the environment through
reasonably foreseeable upset and
accident conditions involving the
release of hazardous materials into
the environment?
c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle
hazardous or acutely hazardous
materials, substances, or waste
within one-quarter mile of an
existing or proposed school?
d) Be located on a site which is
included on a list of hazardous
materials sites compiled pursuant to
Government Code Section 65962.5
and, as a result, would it create a
significant hazard to the public or
the environment?
e) For a project located within an
airport land use plan or, where such
a plan has not been adopted, within
two miles of a public airport or
public use airport, would the project
result in a safety hazard for people
residing or working in the project
area?
f) For a project within the vicinity of a
private airstrip, would the project
result in a safety hazard for people
residing or working in the project
area?
g) Impair
implementation of or
physically interfere with an adopted
emergency response plan or
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporation
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
26

GPA 13-01/ZC 13-01/ER 13-01
ATTACHMENT 6
Potentially
Significant
Impact
emergency evacuation plan?

h) Expose people or structures to a
significant risk of loss, injury or death
involving wild land fires, including
where wild lands are adjacent to
urbanized areas or where residences
are intermixed with wild lands?
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporation
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
Response VIII a): Approval of the General Plan Amendments and Rezoning and the future
proposed site improvements may result in activities which would involve the transportation,
use, and storage of hazardous materials. Future business activities which would result in usage
of hazardous material will be guided by the policies and programs contained in the Citys Zoning
Ordinance and General Plan. The Conservation and Safety Elements of the Citys General Plan
include programs which will have a beneficial impact on protecting public health from the
hazards associated with transportation, storage, and disposal of hazardous wastes.
No impact related to the transportation, use, and storage of hazardous materials is expected.
Response VIII b): Development of the future proposed building may create a significant hazard
to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions
related to the release of pesticides into the environment due to the Vector Control District
handling of pesticides and related activities. This issue was discussed in greater detail in the
General Plan Amendment section of this report.
Staff has recommended two mitigation measures addressing this issue. This potential impact is
considered less than significant with mitigation incorporation.
Response VIII c): A private elementary school is located on South Forbes Street between C and
D Streets which is within 1/2 mile of the project site (approximately 600 west). The relatively
close proximity of the subject property means that there is potential for air quality impacts.
However, as noted in response VIII b) above, staff has recommended a mitigation measure that
adequately addresses these issues. As such, this potential impact is considered less than
significant with mitigation incorporation.
Response VIII d): According to the Lakeport General Plan EIR prepared by Quad Knopf, Inc. in
conjunction with the 2009 General Plan update, there are no sites in the City of Lakeport which
are listed on the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, Liability Information
System (CERCLIS); the National Priority List (NPL); or the Department of Toxic Substances
Control Cortese List.3 There is no impact.
Pg. 5-2, Draft EIR, City of Lakeport General Plan Update
27

GPA 13-01/ZC 13-01/ER 13-01
ATTACHMENT 6
Response VIII e), f): The project site is not located within an airport land use plan or within two
miles of an airport or public use airport which would result in a safety hazard for people
residing or working in the project area. The project is not in the vicinity of a private airstrip
which would result in a safety hazard for people working or residing in the project area. There
is no impact.
Response VIII g): Approval of the General Plan Amendments and Rezoning project and the
subsequent construction of the site improvements will not directly interfere with an adopted
emergency response plan or emergency response systems. The Fire District has the ability to
respond to emergencies affecting the site. There is no impact.
Response VIII h): The proposed General Plan Amendments and Rezoning does not have the
potential to expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury, or death involving
wild land fires as there are no wild lands adjacent to the subject property. No impact is
identified.
IX. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY:
Would the project:
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Violate any water quality standards

or waste discharge requirements?
b) Substantially deplete groundwater
supplies or interfere substantially
with groundwater recharge such
that there would be a net deficit in
aquifer volume or a lowering of the
local groundwater table level (e.g.,
the production rate of pre-existing
nearby wells would drop to a level
which would not support existing
land uses or planned uses for which
permits have been granted)?
c) Substantially alter the existing
drainage pattern of the site or area,
including through the alteration of
the course of a stream or river, in a
manner which would result in
substantial erosion or siltation on- or
off-site?
d) Substantially alter the existing
a)
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporation
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
28

GPA 13-01/ZC 13-01/ER 13-01
Potentially
Significant
Impact
e)
f)
g)
h)
i)
j)
ATTACHMENT 6
drainage pattern of the site or area,

including through the alteration of
the course of a stream or river, or
substantially increase the rate or
amount of surface runoff in a
manner which would result in flood
on- or off-site?
Create or contribute runoff water
which would exceed the capacity of
existing or planned storm water
drainage systems or provide
substantial additional sources of
polluted runoff?
Otherwise substantially degrade
water quality?
Place housing within a 100-year
flood hazard area as mapped on a
federal Flood Hazard Boundary or
Flood Insurance Rate Map or other
flood hazard delineation map?
Place within a 100-year flood hazard
area structures which would impede
or redirect flood flows?
Expose people or structures to a
significant risk of loss, injury or death
involving flooding, including flooding
as a result of the failure of a levee or
dam?
Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or
mudflow?
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporation
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
Response IX a) f): The General Plan Amendments and Rezoning will not create hydrology or
water quality impacts. Construction of the future improvements, related parking and driveway
areas, walkways and other impervious surfaces will result in the changes in absorption rates,
drainage patterns, and/or the rate and amount of surface water runoff generated from the
subject property. There will be a net increase in the amount of storm water runoff generated
at this site.
29

GPA 13-01/ZC 13-01/ER 13-01
ATTACHMENT 6
The subject property is located within the 1,667 acre Forbes Creek drainage basin according to
City records.
The impact of the new impervious surfaces will be partially mitigated via the payment of the
Citys standard storm drainage mitigation fee (currently $0.10 per square foot of new
impervious surfaces). Additional storm drainage improvements will be required in conjunction
with future construction projects.
Municipal Code Chapter 8.40 sets forth the Citys storm water management regulations and
requires the provision of adequate construction and post-construction Best Management
Practices (BMPs) necessary to prevent the illicit discharge of pollutants into nearby Clear Lake.
Staff has recommended a mitigation measure associated with future development requiring the
storm drainage facilities to be developed consistent with the Citys regulations and completed
prior to the issuance of a final occupancy permit for future improvements.
Provided future mitigation measures are imposed and implemented, the project is not
expected to violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements; substantially
alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the
course of a stream or river in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation onor off-site; create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or
planned storm water drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted
runoff; or otherwise substantially degrade water quality. These potential impacts are
considered less than significant with mitigation incorporation
The proposed General Plan Amendments and Rezoning will not substantially deplete
groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge. The Citys water
supply is not dependent on any underground aquifers in the immediate vicinity and as such the
proposed improvements are not expected to interfere substantially with groundwater
recharge. There is no indication that the project will substantially alter the existing drainage
pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or
substantially increase runoff in a manner that will result on on-site of off-site flooding. No
impact is anticipated regarding these issues.
Response IX g): Staff reviewed the Citys GIS map data which indicates the subject property is
located within a 100-year flood hazard area. This CEQA checklist question is related to new
housing in a flood zone. No housing is proposed and therefore there is no impact.
Response IX h- i): There is no indication that the proposed General Plan Amendments and
Rezoning will impede or redirect flood flows or expose people or structures to a significant risk
of loss, injury or death involving flooding. No structures are proposed at this time. Staff has
recommended a standard mitigation measure requiring all future site improvements to be
constructed in accordance with the Citys floodplain regulations. These potential impacts are
considered less than significant with mitigation incorporation.
Response IX j): The Safety Element of the Citys General Plan includes a discussion regarding
potential seiche impacts in the City related to the formation of large waves on Clear Lake as a
result of earthquakes, winds, or wave motions. Figure 18 of the General Plan identifies a seiche
inundation zone along the Clear Lake shoreline which extends landward through the subject
30

GPA 13-01/ZC 13-01/ER 13-01
ATTACHMENT 6
property. However, the Safety Element also notes that the risks associated with seiche are
considered to be relatively low when compared to the risks from earthquake and liquefaction4
in our area. Seiche waves are a potential hazard in Lakeport but there is no indication that they
will detrimentally impact the subject property. Issues associated with the potential seiche
impacts are considered to be less than significant.
X. LAND USE AND PLANNING:
Would the project:
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Physically divide an established

community?
b) Conflict with any applicable land use
plan, policy, or regulation of an
agency with jurisdiction over the
project (including, but not limited to
the general plan, specific plan, local
coastal
program,
or
zoning
ordinance) adopted for the purpose
of avoiding or mitigating an
environmental effect?
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporation
Less Than
Significant
Impact
a)
c)
No
Impact
Conflict with any applicable habitat

conservation plan or natural
community conservation plan?
Response X a): The General Plan Amendments and Rezoning will not create CEQA land use and
planning impacts. This staff report does contain an analysis of the proposed General Plan
Amendments and Zone Change in the context of the Citys Zoning Ordinance criteria.
Construction of the proposed future site improvements will not physically divide an established
community. The subject properties are partially developed and have been the site of various
governmental, office and residential activities in the past. The proposed General Plan
Amendments and Zone Change project will not impact nearby residences or businesses in terms
of access or any other ingress or egress issues. No impact has been identified.
Response X b): This checklist question asks if the project will conflict with any applicable land
use plan, policy, or regulation (including, but not limited to the General Plan, specific plan, local
coastal program, or Zoning Ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an
environmental effect.
Lakeport General Plan, Safety Element, Pg. X-3
31

GPA 13-01/ZC 13-01/ER 13-01
ATTACHMENT 6
The Citys General Plan and Municipal Code include a number of policies, programs and
regulations which address increasing public access to important natural resources including
Clear Lake, wetlands, streams and creeks. Allowing development to proceed which does not
comply with the Citys policies and regulations negatively impacts the Citys built environment
and its residents and is therefore considered to be a negative environmental impact.
Policy CD 1.2 of the General Plan Community Design Element is related to public access and
states that site design should maximize public access to and create opportunities for use of
shoreline areas in locations contiguous to the lake, stream, or wetland where such access
would not jeopardize habitats and other environmental attributes of the water body. 5 Two
related General Plan programs provide more specific details regarding public access:
Program CD 1.2-a: Development review of proposed projects shall identify opportunities for
increasing public access to Clear Lake, wetlands, streams, and creeks in the Planning Area.
Program CD 1.2-b: Public access easements to Clear Lake, streams and wetlands (where
appropriate) between properties, shall be required at mile intervals where feasible.
The Community Design Element, Pg. V-13, includes the following polices related to lakefront
access and public open space:
Policy CD 4.8: Lakefront Access. Improve and develop pedestrian paths and access between
the downtown area and the lakefront.
Policy CD 4.9: Public Open Space. Continue to preserve and acquire additional public open
space through dedications, the purchase of fee title or easements.
Policy CD 7.2: Public Open Space. Revise the development review process to ensure that a
meaningful amount of useable public open space is incorporated into commercial, retail,
mixed use and office development. Require a Public Open Space Plan for commercial
developments in excess of 3/4 acre. (Usable public open space is space which is accessible
to the public and can be utilized for walking, sitting, etc. versus space that exists only to
provide visual relief.)
The development of future new buildings or remodel of existing structures shall take into
account the goals and policies set forth in the Community Design Element of the General Plan.
Special lighting, new landscaping, street furniture, sidewalk enhancement, provision of
pedestrian paths, protection of scenic views, provision of access to the lakefront, along with the
provision of other public amenities, should be considered in the design and review of the
future site improvements.
In addition the development of new buildings or remodel of existing structures, pedestrian
circulation shall be taken into account. The widening of sidewalks, provision of additional
crosswalks, new street signage, and/or new sidewalk surfaces and treatments may be required.
These are important issues for the community and are addressed in this Initial Study at this
time so that the applicant is made aware of the need is address them in conjunction with future
Lakeport General Plan, Community Design Element, Pg. V-10
32

GPA 13-01/ZC 13-01/ER 13-01
ATTACHMENT 6
site development proposals. Impacts directly related to the proposed General Plan
Amendments and Zone Change are considered to be less than significant at this time.
Regarding the provision of parking, there are only seven existing parking spaces available to the
staff and general public associated with the site. The existing and proposed buildings will have
over 8,000 square feet of floor area. The Lakeport Municipal Code Section indicates that one
parking space per 250 square feet of floor area is required for office uses; the amount of
required parking for just the office and lab area would be 16 stalls. The preliminary plans
submitted by Vector Control do not adequately address the future parking demand.
Staff has recommended a mitigation measure (Transportation/Traffic impact) which calls for
the submittal of a future parking plan and compliance with the Citys development standards
regarding perimeter curbing, back-up distance, striping, landscaping, maintenance, etc.
Response X c): There is no applicable habitat conservation plan or natural community
conservation plan in place at the present time which affects the subject property. There is no
impact associated with this issue.
XI. MINERAL RESOURCES:
Would the project:
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Result in the loss of availability of a

known mineral resource that would
be of value to the region and the
residents of the state?
b) Result in the loss of availability of a
locally-important mineral resource
recovery site delineated on a local
general plan, specific plan or other
land use plan?
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporation
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
a)
Response XI a): There are no mining or mineral extraction operations within the Lakeport City
limits or the Sphere of Influence. Page VII-4 of the General Plans Conservation Element notes
that there is no active mineral extraction or mining operations in the City and also indicates that
the Plan prohibits any mining or mineral extraction activities within the City. There is no
impact.
Response XI b): No mineral recovery sites are located in the City; no impact has been
identified.
XII. NOISE:
Would the project result in:
33

GPA 13-01/ZC 13-01/ER 13-01
ATTACHMENT 6
Potentially
Significant
Impact
a)
b)
c)
d)
e)
f)
Exposure of persons to or generation

of noise levels in excess of standards
established in the local general plan
or noise ordinance, or applicable
standards of other agencies?
Exposure of persons to or generation
of excessive ground borne vibration
or ground borne noise levels?
A substantial permanent increase in
ambient noise levels in the project
vicinity above levels existing without
the project?
A substantial temporary or periodic
increase in ambient noise levels in
the project vicinity above levels
existing without the project?
For a project located within an
airport land use plan or, where such
a plan has not been adopted, within
two miles of a public airport or
public use airport, would the project
expose people residing or working in
the project area to excessive noise
levels?
For a project within the vicinity of a
private airstrip, would the project
expose people residing or working in
the project area to excessive noise
levels?
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporation
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
Response XII a): The General Plan Amendments and Rezoning will not directly generate noise
impacts; however, subsequent development projects and the Districts equipment operation
and maintenance activities could increase the areas existing noise levels due to an increase in
vehicle traffic, customers and employees. The typical administrative and lab activities are not
expected to generate a significant amount of additional noise. The area to the west of the
project site is relatively noisy given its proximity to South Main Street and other commercial
activities which generate notable amounts of noise.
Its important to note that the District has advised the City that they will be moving their small
workshop to its Todd Road facility within the next year, which will likely reduce noise from
34

GPA 13-01/ZC 13-01/ER 13-01
ATTACHMENT 6
maintenance and equipment operations (occasional use of drill press, welding equipment,
power saw, and air compressor) between the hours of 7:30 AM and 4:00 PM. The District has
indicated that the number of employees is not expected to increase in conjunction with the
future expansion projects.
The level of noise increase associated with the General Plan Amendments and Rezoning project
will not result in the exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of standards
established in the Lakeport General Plan or the applicable standards of other agencies.
Excessive noise in commercially-zoned areas is defined in Section 17.28.010 of the Municipal
Code as noise or other sound emissions which exceed 70 dBA for any 15-minute period in any
one-hour period during the hours of 7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. The allowable noise level
decreases to 55 dBA during the evening and early morning hours. Residential limits are 60 dBA
during the day and 45 dBA at night. This is a less than significant impact.
Response XII b), c): The General Plan Amendments and Rezoning will not have immediate noise
impacts however subsequent construction activities may have the potential to expose persons
living nearby to ground-borne vibration or ground-borne noise levels and ambient noise levels
in the project vicinity. There is no impact associated with the General Plan Amendments and
Rezoning; however, this issue will be analyzed in subsequent environmental review of the
proposed site improvements.
Response XII d): All future construction activities will be subject to the noise guidelines set
forth in Chapter 17.28 of the Lakeport Municipal Code, including a prohibition of construction
activities on Sundays. The noise regulations prohibit work starting before 7:00 a.m. or
extending later than 10:00 p.m. This is an important consideration due to the residential uses
in the vicinity of the project site.
This potential impact is considered less than significant at this time. Additional mitigation will
likely be imposed during environmental reviews associated with future development projects.
Response XII e), f): The subject property is not located within an airport land use plan or in the
vicinity of a private airstrip which would generate substantial noise impacts. There is no
impact.
XIII. POPULATION AND HOUSING:
Would the project:
Potentially
Significant
Impact
a)
Induce
substantial
population
growth in an area, either directly (for
example, by proposing new homes
and businesses) or indirectly (for
example, through extension of roads
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporation
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
35

GPA 13-01/ZC 13-01/ER 13-01
ATTACHMENT 6
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporation
Less Than
Significant
Impact
or other infrastructure)?
b) Displace substantial numbers of
existing housing, necessitating the
construction of replacement housing
elsewhere?
c) Displace substantial numbers of
people, necessitating the construction of replacement housing
elsewhere?
No
Impact
Response XIII a) - c): Based on the existing site conditions, the specific nature of the General
Plan Amendments and Zone Change and the type of anticipated site improvements, the
proposal will not induce substantial growth in the Lakeport area, either directly or indirectly;
displace any existing housing; or displace any residents in a manner that would necessitate the
construction of replacement housing. No impact has been identified.
XIV. PUBLIC SERVICES:
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Less Than
No
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporation
Significant
Impact
Impact
a) Would the project result in

substantial adverse physical impacts
associated with the provision of new
or physically altered governmental
facilities, need for new or physically
altered governmental facilities, the
construction of which could cause
significant environmental impacts, in
order to maintain acceptable service
ratios, response times or other
performance objectives for any of
the public services:
i) Fire protection?
ii) Police protection?
iii) Schools?
36

GPA 13-01/ZC 13-01/ER 13-01
ATTACHMENT 6
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Less Than
No
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporation
Significant
Impact
Impact
iv) Parks?
v) Other public facilities?
Response XIV a): The proposed General Plan Amendments and Rezoning will not impact the
provision of public services and utilities, however the future site improvement projects will
result in the minor alteration of existing governmental services including fire protection, police
protection, public facility maintenance, and other governmental services. The project will not
result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically
altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental
impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance
objectives related to fire protection, police protection, schools, parks or other public facilities.
Fire protection: The Lakeport Fire Protection District typically submits written comments
related to the proposed improvement and construction projects. No comments were
requested for the current proposed actions.
The Fire District imposes a fire mitigation fee which will be collected in conjunction with the
issuance of a building permit. The fee as of September 2014 is $1.00 per square foot for all
covered areas.
Police protection: The City of Lakeport Chief of Police will submit comments/concerns
regarding police protection in conjunction with future development projects.
Schools: The Lakeport Unified School District has adopted a school impact fee resolution in
accordance with State law. The District requires the developer of commercial structures to
pay a fee for new building area to the School District to mitigate the impacts to the schools
Parks & Other public facilities: There is no indication that the construction of the proposed
project and the related uses will substantially affect the Citys park system or other public
facilities.
Regarding the proposed General Plan Amendments and Zone Change and potential impacts to
Public Services, no impact has been identified.
XV. RECREATION:
Potentially
Significant
Impact
a) Would the project increase the use
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporation
Less Than
Significant
Impact
37
No
Impact

GPA 13-01/ZC 13-01/ER 13-01
ATTACHMENT 6
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporation
of existing neighborhood and

regional parks or other recreational
facilities such that substantial
physical deterioration of the facility
would occur or be accelerated?
b) Does the project include recreational
facilities or require the construction
or expansion of recreational facilities
which might have an adverse
physical effect on the environment?
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
Response XIV a), b): The City of Lakeport maintains a system of parks, recreation facilities and
open space for its citizens. The City has approximately 63.5 acres of parkland not including
recreational facilities at the schools. Lakeports park and recreational facilities include parks,
boat launch facilities, a public swimming pool, and partially-developed public parks.
In addition to City parks, recreational facilities in the Lakeport vicinity are provided at the
Highland Springs Reservoir, Lake County Fairgrounds, the County Park and Clearlake State Park.
Community use of school playing fields provides additional recreational facilities.
Construction of the future site improvements and the related Vector Control District activities
will not result in a substantial increase in population or employment levels which could increase
the use of existing neighborhood/regional parks such that substantial physical deterioration of
the facilities would occur or be accelerated. The project does not include any recreational
facilities nor will it require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might
have an adverse physical effect on the environment.
These potential impacts are considered to be less than significant.
XVI. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC:
Would the project:
Potentially
Significant
Impact
a)
Conflict with an applicable plan,

ordinance or policy establishing
measures of effectiveness for
performance of the circulation
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporation
38
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact

GPA 13-01/ZC 13-01/ER 13-01
ATTACHMENT 6
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporation
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
system, taking into account all

modes of transportation including
mass transit and non-motorized
travel and relevant components of
the circulation system, including but
not limited to intersections, streets,
highways and freeways, pedestrian
and bicycle paths, and mass transit?
b)
c)
d)
Conflict
with
an
applicable
congestion management program,
including, but not limited to level of
service standards and travel demand
measures, or other standards
established by the county congestion
management agency for designated
roads or highways?
Result in a change in air traffic

patterns, including either an increase
in traffic levels or a change in
location that results in substantial
safety risks?
Substantially increase hazards due to

a design feature (e.g., sharp curves
or dangerous intersections) or
incompatible uses (e.g., farm
equipment)?
e)
Result in inadequate emergency

access?
f)
Conflict with adopted policies, plans,

or programs regarding public transit,
bicycle, or pedestrian facilities, or
otherwise decrease the performance
or safety of such facilities?
Response XVI a): Approval of the General Plan Amendments and Zone Change will not conflict
with any plans, ordinances or policies related to the effective implementation of the Citys
circulation system, including streets and pedestrian facilities.
39

GPA 13-01/ZC 13-01/ER 13-01
ATTACHMENT 6
Future site improvement projects will result in a net increase in traffic in the vicinity of the
project site. This increase will primarily affect Esplanade, C Street and South Main Street and,
to a lesser degree, the arterial streets which lead to South Main Street including Martin Street,
Lakeport Boulevard, Eleventh Street and North High Street. The applicant has indicated that
the District does not anticipate an increase in personnel in conjunction with the future projects.
The potential traffic and trip generation impacts will be thoroughly analyzed in conjunction with
the future projects when the complete scope of the improvements is known.
Regarding the potential for conflict with plans, ordinances or policies related to the effective
implementation of the Citys circulation system, the most significant issues are related to the
proposed intensification of the site activities that are expected to follow the General Plan
Amendments and Zone Change actions.
Installation of improvements in the right-of-way will require an approval of engineered plans
and an encroachment permit. The applicant will be required to coordinate with the City
Engineers office for the submittal, review and approval of frontage improvement plans as well
as the issuance of an encroachment permit.
Staff has recommended typical mitigation measures which address the installation of the rightof-way improvements along the sites street frontages, including the need to dedicate land to
provide for an adequate sidewalk width and the requirement to design the improvements to be
consistent with City standards. The mitigation measures will be fully implemented in
conjunction with the future development proposals.
Additional recommended transportation-related mitigation measures are related to the
provision of adequate on-site parking, including a handicapped-accessible stall and other
related site improvements associated with anticipated future project phases. The submittal of
a parking analysis is also recommended as a mitigation measure. As described in the General
Plan Amendment section of this staff report, the parking analysis should evaluate and quantify
the demand for parking (both existing and long term) and provide long term design and
development solutions for the provision of an adequate amount of off street parking for the
public, District employees and District vehicles.
As previously noted in Checklist question XII a), the District has advised the City that they will be
moving their small workshop to its Todd Road facility within the next year. Several of the
Districts vehicles will be relocated to the Todd Road facility. This action may slightly reduce
District-related traffic on Esplanade and C Street according to the applicant.
The transportation-related impacts identified in this section are considered less than significant
with mitigation incorporation. See conclusion of report for the recommended mitigation
measures.
Response XVI b): This CEQA checklist question asks if the project will exceed, individually or
cumulatively, a level of service standard established by the county congestion management
agency. Lake County has not established a congestion management agency according to the
City Engineer. As such, this question is not applicable to this project and there is no impact.
The proposed General Plan Amendments and Zone Change will not generate traffic volumes
that will detrimentally impact nearby streets or intersections.
40

GPA 13-01/ZC 13-01/ER 13-01
ATTACHMENT 6
Response XVI c): There are no components of the project that will result in a change in air
traffic patterns including either the volume or the location of air traffic in the vicinity of the
project. No impact is identified.
Response XVI d): As previously described staff has recommended mitigation measures related
to the design of the proposed right-of-way improvements, including the potential need to
widen the public sidewalks along the C Street and Esplanade Street frontages of the applicants
properties. Provided the recommended mitigation measures are implemented, there is no
indication that the proposed project will substantially increase transportation-related hazards
due to a design feature or incompatible uses. These potential impacts are less than significant
with mitigation incorporation.
Response XVI e): Adequate emergency access will be provided into the site based on the
responses from the Fire District and the Police Department. There is no impact.
Response XVI f): As described in Response XVI a) above, future right-of-way improvements
along the sites street frontages will be required to meet the Citys development requirements.
These potential impacts are less than significant with mitigation incorporation.
XVII.
UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS
Would the project:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
a)
b)
c)
d)
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporation
Less Than
Significant
Impact
Exceed
wastewater
treatment
requirements of the applicable
Regional Water Quality Control
Board?
Require or result in the construction

of new water or wastewater
treatment facilities or expansion of
existing facilities, the construction of
which could cause significant
environmental effects?
Require or result in the construction

of new storm water drainage
facilities or expansion of existing
facilities, the construction of which
could
cause
significant
environmental effects?
Have sufficient water supplies

available to serve the project from
41
No
Impact

GPA 13-01/ZC 13-01/ER 13-01
ATTACHMENT 6
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporation
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
existing entitlements and resources,

or
are
new
or
expanded
entitlements needed?
e)
f)
g)
Result in a determination by the

wastewater treatment provider
which serves or may serve the
project that it has adequate capacity
to serve the projects projected
demand in addition to the providers
existing commitments?
Be served by a landfill with sufficient

permitted capacity to accommodate
the projects solid waste disposal
needs?
Comply with federal, state, and local

statutes and regulations related to
solid waste?
Response XVII a)- e): Approval of the proposed General Plan Amendments and Zone Change
will not exceed the wastewater treatment requirements of the Central Valley Regional Water
Quality Control Board. Sewage generated from future project phases will be treated by the
CLMSD plant in south Lakeport. The site currently has a sewer connection which serves the
existing buildings and the sewer volumes related to the future improvements are not expected
to be significantly higher. Separate mens and womens bathrooms are proposed according to
the submitted information. Community Development Department records indicate that the
sewer treatment plant has capacity for over 65 residential unit equivalents at the present time.
Adequate treatment capacity exists and the project will not require or result in the construction
of new wastewater treatment facilities. Payment of sewer expansion fees will be calculated at
the time of future construction. As such, potential impacts related to sewer capacity are
considered to be less than significant.
Significant impacts to the Citys water system are not expected given the estimated water
usage amounts. The site has an existing water connection that serves the existing buildings.
The existing connection may be upgraded if needed to serve the future expansion project. A
determination will be made at a future time to account for any additional water RUEs. City
records indicate that approximately 1,150 water RUEs are available at the present time.
Potential impacts related to the Citys water supply and distribution facilities are deemed to be
less than significant.
42

GPA 13-01/ZC 13-01/ER 13-01
ATTACHMENT 6
Potential impacts to the storm water system are not fully known at this stage. A design of the
sites storm water system has not been submitted. The construction of the future storm water
facilities is not expected to create any significant environmental impacts; however, the plans for
the future system will need to be analyzed during the environmental review of any future
construction projects.
Please see the hydrology section of this report for more discussion regarding storm water
issues.
Response XVII f), g): Approval of the proposed General Plan Amendments and Rezoning will
not create solid waste issues, however future construction of expanded site improvements will
result in a slight increase in the generation of solid waste. The City contracts with Lakeport
Disposal for its solid waste disposal and all residents and businesses are subject to mandatory
garbage service. Most solid waste from Lakeport is transferred to the East Lake landfill, located
on a 32 acre parcel just outside the City of Clearlake. The landfill has a total capacity of 6
million cubic yards and is expected to reach total capacity between 2020 and 2025. 6 Therefore,
the project will be served by a landfill with sufficient capacity and is expected to comply with all
applicable solid waste regulations.
A well-designed trash enclosure to accommodate the waste and recyclables generated by the
Districts activities will be required. A plan for the enclosure to complement the other site
improvements will be required by the City in conjunction with future development applications.
Painted steel doors, a concrete perimeter and other durable features are typically required.
No impact is identified for these issues at this time.
XVIII. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE
Potentially
Significant
Impact
a)
Does the project have the potential

to substantially degrade the quality
of the environment, substantially
reduce the habitat of a fish or
wildlife species, cause a fish or
wildlife population to drop below
self-sustaining levels, threaten to
eliminate a plant or animal
community, substantially reduce the
number or restrict the range of an
endangered, rare or threatened
species; or eliminate important
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporation
Draft EIR, City of Lakeport General Plan Update, Pg. 3-158
43
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact

GPA 13-01/ZC 13-01/ER 13-01
ATTACHMENT 6
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporation
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
examples of the major periods of

California history or prehistory?
b)
c)
Does the project have impacts that

are individually limited, but
cumulatively considerable?
("Cumulatively considerable" means
that the incremental effects of an
individual project are significant
when viewed in connection with the
effects of past projects, the effects
of other current projects, and the
effects of probable future projects)?
Does the project have environmental

effects which will cause substantial
adverse effects on human beings,
either directly or indirectly?
Response XVIII a) - c): Based on the findings set forth in the Initial Study, the proposed General
Plan Amendments and Zone Change actions have the potential to adversely impact the
environment unless mitigation measures are incorporated into the project approval. The
potentially significant effects identified herein are related to air quality, hazards and hazardous
materials, hydrology and water quality, and transportation/traffic. Staff has
developed/recommended conditions that will mitigate the identified impacts to a less than
significant level. The potential environmental impacts identified in the Initial Study are less
than significant with mitigation incorporation.
CONCLUSION AND MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE: The General Plan Amendment
and Zone Change actions must be reviewed by the Planning Commission and forwarded on to
the City Council in the form of a recommendation. The City Council must conduct a public
hearing and consider the issues and factors involved in the proposal and must make a
determination. Assuming that the City Council approves the General Plan Amendments and
Rezoning request, a City Council Resolution and Zone Change Ordinance must be approved.
The proposed General Plan Amendments and Zone Change applications submitted by the Lake
County Vector Control District are in general conformity with the City of Lakeport General Plan
and Zoning Ordinance as documented in this staff report. The Vector Control District has had
land ownership and a physical presence in this part of Lakeport since the 1950s. The District is
committed to this site as it offers the lake access that they need, the administrative and lab
space that is necessary and it will also allow for expansion. The General Plan Amendments and
Zone Change will also be rectify a long standing issue for the City in that the General Plan
44

GPA 13-01/ZC 13-01/ER 13-01
ATTACHMENT 6
designations on two of the parcels are not appropriate and dont fit the existing and proposed
uses. The Resort Residential General Plan designations on APNs 025-501-36 and -39 and the
Residential designations on APNs 025-501-17 and -18 are inconsistent and an amendment to
Public and Civic Uses is appropriate.
Similarly, the Zoning designation of R-5 Resort Residential on APN 025-501-39 is inconsistent
with the General Plan designation and a change to PCU Public and Civic Uses is appropriate.
The analysis and information in this report along with the facts and information provided by the
applicant as contained in the City file support an approval of the proposed General Plan
Amendments and Zone Change. The Citys approval of the proposed General Plan Amendments
and Zone Change will then facilitate the Districts expansion plans.
The Citys approach in completing the CEQA Initial Study is to consider the potentially
significant impacts related to the proposed General Plan and Zoning amendments and to
analyze the potentially significant environmental impacts that may occur with the expansion
and future construction project. This can be a challenge because the only project in front of the
City currently is the General Plan Amendments and Zone Change. However, this Initial Study
has addressed some of the future project impacts with the goal of providing as much
information to the applicant, and the public, as possible.
The proposed General Plan Amendments and Zone Change of the parcels owned by the Lake
County Vector Control District on Esplanade and C Streets as described herein do have the
potential to impact the environment unless mitigation measures are incorporated into the
project approval. Staff has developed mitigation measures which have been agreed to by the
applicant, and when implemented will mitigate the potential impacts of the General Plan and
Zone Changes to a less than significant level.
Future site improvements and expansion projects will be subject to subsequent CEQA
environmental review and mitigation.
Future development projects will also be subject to the Lakeport Municipal Code Chapter 17.27
(Architectural and Design Review).
Recommendation: Staff supports a Planning Commission recommendation to the City Council
for the adoption of a Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Lake County Vector Control
General Plan Amendments and Zone Change project as provided for in the California
Environmental Quality Act. Staff recommends approval of the proposed General Plan
Amendments and the proposed Zone Change as described herein and subject to the mitigation
measures set forth below.
All required mitigation measures, and other conditions of approval stemming from the project,
will be monitored/evaluated by staff in the future in accordance with the provisions of Lakeport
Municipal Code Section 17.35.020.
1.
The applicant/owner shall maintain the temporary/interim parking area at 35 C Street

(former APN 025-501-39) with an adequate amount of road base to prevent the
generation of nuisance dust. The applicant/owner shall take the appropriate steps to
effectively reduce or eliminate dust problems if the City receives legitimate complaints.
45

GPA 13-01/ZC 13-01/ER 13-01
ATTACHMENT 6
The applicant/owner shall also ensure that the C Street right-of-way is kept clear of any
gravel/debris related to the interim parking lot. (Air Quality)
2.
The applicant/owner shall provide the City documentation which certifies the Districts
laboratory facilities, protocols and procedures. (Hazards and Hazardous Materials)
3.
The applicant/owner shall adhere to all appropriate safety protocols related to pesticide
handling procedures and infectious agent research and shall maintain all required
laboratory certifications. (Hazards and Hazardous Materials)
4.
The future storm water drainage collection and conveyance facilities shall be developed in
accordance with the Citys storm water system regulations and the approved plans and
shall be completed prior to the issuance of a final occupancy permit. (Hydrology and
Water Quality)
5.
The future site improvements shall be subject to all requirements of Lakeport Municipal
Code Chapter 8.40 (Stormwater Management) and any subsequent revisions or
modifications thereof. All erosion control measures and construction and postconstruction stormwater Best Management Practices shall be completed in accordance
with the approved plan prior to the issuance of a final occupancy permit. (Hydrology and
Water Quality)
6.
The applicant/owner shall contribute the standard City storm water mitigation fee based
on the amount of new impervious surface area prior to the issuance of a development
permit associated with future site improvements. (Hydrology and Water Quality)
7.
All future site improvements in the flood zone shall be developed in accordance with the
Citys Floodplain Management Ordinance (Lakeport Municipal Code Ch. 15.16), including
the submittal of adequately detailed construction plans prior to construction. (Hydrology
and Water Quality)
8.
All future new driveway approaches, handicapped ramps and other right-of-way
improvements shall be constructed to City standard and shall comply with the
requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act.
The future right-of-way
improvements shall be detailed on construction plans prepared by a registered civil
engineer. Said plans shall be submitted to the City Engineer for review and approval prior
to the issuance of an Encroachment Permit for work within the City right-of-way. All City
insurance requirements shall be met for work that occurs in the right-of-way. The rightof-way improvements shall be completed prior to the issuance of a certificate of
occupancy for the new building. (Transportation/traffic)
9.
The applicant/owner shall provide at least 16 off-street parking spaces, including one
handicapped-accessible space in conjunction with future development projects on the
subject property. The handicapped-accessible spaces shall be van accessible. All offstreet parking spaces shall comply with the Citys standards in terms of width, depth, and
unobstructed back-up area. The handicapped parking spaces shall be developed in
accordance with the Americans with Disabilities Act in terms of size, demarcation, and
signage. Accessible paths of travel from parking areas to buildings shall also be provided.
(Transportation/traffic)
46

GPA 13-01/ZC 13-01/ER 13-01
ATTACHMENT 6
10. The applicant/owner shall submit a parking analysis in conjunction with future project
phases. The parking analysis should evaluate and quantify the demand for parking (both
existing and long term) and provide long term design and development solutions for the
provision of an adequate amount of off street parking for the public, District employees
and District vehicles. At the Citys discretion, the recommended number of off-street
parking spaces may be modified based on the findings/conclusions of the submitted
parking analysis. (Transportation/traffic)
11. Future parking areas shall be designed and developed in accordance with Lakeport
Municipal Code Chapter 17.23, including the provision of perimeter curbing in all
appropriate locations; traffic directional arrows and signage; and landscaping prior to the
issuance of a certificate of occupancy. All on-site parking lot striping, directional arrows,
traffic control markings and signage shall be maintained in the future.
(Transportation/traffic)
SAMPLE MOTION
Move that the Planning Commission find, based on the facts presented in the Initial
Study for the Lakeport General Plan Amendments and Zone Change project at 408 and
410 Esplanade and 35 C Street, that the significant environmental impacts that have
been identified are mitigated by the mitigation measures/conditions of approval to a
less than significant level. The Planning Commission recommends that the Lakeport City
Council adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration for the project as provided for in the
California Environmental Quality Act.
Move that the Planning Commission recommends City Council approval of the Lakeport
General Plan Amendments for: 1.) APNs 025-501-17 and 025-501-18 from Residential
to Public Civic Uses and 2.) APNs 025-501-36 and 025-501-39 -- from Resort Residential
to Public Civic Uses.
Move that the Planning Commission recommends City Council approval of a Lakeport
Zoning Ordinance amendment for: 1.) APN 025-501-39 from R-5 Resort Residential to
PCU Public and Civic Uses.
Further move that the Planning Commissions recommendations be based on the
following: a) the information and application documentation submitted by the project
proponent; b) the information and documentation contained in the Citys CEQA Initial
Study and staff report and City file on the project; c) the information and facts received
at the public hearing on November 12, 2014; and d) the fact that there is general
conformance with the applicable criteria and standards specified in the Lakeport
Municipal Code.
The recommendation and approval of these requests shall be subject to the
conditions/mitigation measures specified in the staff report and/or as amended at the
public hearing.
47

GPA 13-01/ZC 13-01/ER 13-01
ATTACHMENT 6
Project Condition Monitoring

A. Staff shall conduct a pre-construction/pre-permit review of the conditions that must be
satisfied prior to the issuance of a building or other development permit and note the status
accordingly.
B. Staff, in conjunction with other City departments, shall conduct a review of the project and
the conditions that must be satisfied during the construction or development phase of the
project. All required conditions shall be completed prior to the issuance of an occupancy
permit, operation of the use, or execution of a financial security agreement.
C. Staff, in conjunction with other City departments, shall conduct post-construction review of
the project and the conditions of approval. The post-construction monitoring shall be
completed as needed. The post-construction report must indicate the status of all
conditions, remedial action necessary, and other observations and recommendations. Postconstruction reports may be made available to the Lakeport Planning Commission or City
Council who may initiate actions necessary to correct any deficiencies.
I have read this Initial Environmental Study (ER 13-01) and agree that the
mitigation measures identified herein will be incorporated into the project at 408
and 410 Esplanade Street and 35 C Street in Lakeport, CA.
__________________________
_____________________________
Print Name
(applicant/owner)
Signature
48
____________
Date
ATTACHMENT 7
CITY OF LAKEPORT
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
SUPPLEMENTAL MEMORANDUM TO
STAFF REPORT
ITEM:
VI. B.
DATE:
November 5, 2014
FILE NO:
GPA 13-01 / ZC 13-01 / ER 13-01
APPLICANT & LAND

OWNER:

410 Esplanade Avenue
P.O. Box 310
Lakeport, California 95453
STAFF CONTACT:
Andrew Britton
A 30-day public review period for the staff report and Initial Study for the proposed
Mitigated Negative Declaration commenced on September 29, 2014 and concluded on
October 30, 2014. During this period interested and concerned individuals and public
agencies could submit written comments on the document. Section 15074 of the
California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines indicate that prior to approving a
project, the decision making body shall consider the proposed mitigated negative
declaration together with any comments received during the public review process.
Two sets of comments/questions were received during the public review period, both of
which are attached for your review (Attachments 1 and 2).
The first comments/questions were submitted by a neighboring property owner who
resides within 300 feet of the project site. Please see Attachment 1 for the complete
comments. The comments included two questions, both of which are addressed below:
Question 1: Why such a low number of spaces in light of the City of Lakeport parking
laws?
Staff Response: The existing Vector Control District shop building at 408 Esplanade is
also used for parking Vector Control District vehicles. On 10/15/14 City staff noted five
trucks parked inside the building. Lakeport Municipal Code (LMC) Section 17.23.040 A.
states (in part) that "Parking areas within a building shall not be included in the
computation of floor area." LMC Section 17.23.050 sets forth a variety of different uses
ATTACHMENT 7
GPA 13-01/ZC 13-01/ER 13-01
Responses to Submitted Comments
and the related parking requirements and indicates that "For any use not specifically set
forth below, the community development department, the planning commission, city
council, or other review shall determine the amount of parking required." In this case,
the Municipal Code does not set forth a specific parking standard for a government
office that includes areas devoted to administrative uses, laboratory areas and
shop/maintenance uses. The existing Vector Control facilities are not a typical
administrative office. These factors were considered when developing the
recommended mitigation measure calling for the provision of 16 off-street parking
spaces in conjunction with the future site improvements, which is not considered to be
a low number of parking spaces.
Question 2: Also, can you please clarify what the bolded text, from page 7 of the
Mitigation report, means?
Staff Response: The following statement in the staff report: "long term shared
functional parking agreements with neighboring property owners", refers to the nearby
commercial shopping center/parking lot or another nearby commercial site such as
Hillside Honda. It is not intended to suggest that neighboring residential property
owners enter into shared parking agreements with Vector Control.
The other received comments/questions were submitted by an adjoining property
owner. Please see Attachment 2 for the complete comments. The first section of
comments addresses the laboratory facilities operated by the Vector Control District
and includes the following question:
Where in the code book does it say labs are allowed in the PCU zoning?
Staff Response: The zoning regulations for the PCU (Public & Civic Uses) zoning district
(LMC Chapter 17.16) are attached (Attachment 3). Section 17.16.020 of the LMC sets
forth the types of uses that are allowed in the PCU district including public buildings;
City, county and state offices; public schools; public corporation and maintenance yards;
and other public uses similar in character to those uses listed above.. The Vector
Control District public buildings are consistent with the uses listed in LMC Section
17.16.020.
The submitted comments (first section Lab and the final paragraph) express concerns
about the applicants storage and use of pesticides and chemicals and their handling of
hazardous materials and infectious diseases. Dr. Jamesina Scott, Vector Control
Districts Manager/Research Director, sent an email to City staff in late September which
provides details regarding the Districts storage and use of pesticides, chemicals and
their laboratory operations. Portions of the email are pasted below:
I wanted to clarify that the District does not store pesticides at the Esplanade
facility, but at another facility that is outside the city limits. There are incidental
small quantities of pesticide in locked containers on the trucks that are parked
inside the locked garage on Esplanade. The District uses small amounts of
various lab chemicals (mainly isopropyl (rubbing) alcohol, ethanol, acetone, and
various products used for water quality assays) at this site, but purchases these
in small, consumable quantities (typically less than a pint). The total amount of
ATTACHMENT 7
GPA 13-01/ZC 13-01/ER 13-01
Responses to Submitted Comments
pesticides and chemicals on the Esplanade properties are below the reporting
thresholds required for a Hazardous Materials Business Plan (HMBP). All of our
lab and operations employees are state-certified in pesticide handling and
application and receive annual pesticide safety training and complete 36 hours of
continuing education every 24 months to maintain their certifications. The
Districts work with infectious agents consists of collecting mosquitoes, dead
birds, and ticks that are sent to state laboratories for testing. We are regulated
by California Department of Public HealthVectorborne Disease Section
(CDPH-VBDS), which inspects our facilities and records; the Lake County Ag
Commissioner, who reviews our pesticide applications, application records,
pesticide safety, application equipment, and pesticide storage; and Lake County
Environmental Health, which inspects our facilities for compliance with the
HMBP.
As described above, the applicants laboratory facilities are regulated by several

agencies and their personnel are properly trained and certified.
Issues associated with the applicants laboratory activities are addressed in the staff
report/Initial Studyplease see discussion on Pages 9 and 10; the Hazards and
Hazardous Materials section on Pages 25-28; and recommended mitigation measures 2
and 3 on Page 46. The applicant has agreed to comply with all of the recommended
mitigation measures.
The second set of submitted comments (Attachment 2) also describes parking problems
associated with the applicants current activities and future expansion plans. The
comments reference the 1997 development project (construction of the applicants
new laboratory) and the original City-imposed requirement to demolish the old
laboratory so that additional on-site parking could be provided. The City tried, without
success, to get the Vector Control District to comply with the requirement to demolish
the old lab and provide additional parking. The District resisted following through. In
2002, the then-Lakeport City Managers response was to recommend transferring the
responsibility for complying with the requirement to the Vector Control District. City
records indicate that a formal transfer agreement was approved by the City Council in
August 2002. The fact that the old laboratory is still present is, in staffs opinion, the
Districts responsibility.
The proposed actions are limited to the General Plan Amendment and Rezoning
applications. The staff report/Initial Study acknowledges the applicants future
development plans and contains an analysis of the potential parking issues. Please see
pages 7 through 10, 33 and 40 of the staff report for discussion regarding the parking
issues as well as recommended mitigation measures 9 and 10 (Pgs. 46 & 47) which
address the provision of new off-street parking in conjunction with future project
phases.
CONCLUSION: No new mitigation measures or changes to the mitigation measures set
forth in the staff report/Initial Study are recommended as a result of the comments and
questions submitted in conjunction with the Vector Control District project.
Attachments (3)
3
ATTACHMENT 7
Looking north on Esplanade
Attachment 1
page 2
ATTACHMENT 7
ATTACHMENT 7
Attachment 2
October 28, 2014
Andrew Britton
Community Development Dept.
City of Lakeport
225 Park Street
Lakeport, CA 95453
Concerns Regarding Staff Report and Mitigated Negative Declaration for Lake County
Vector Control District
1. LAB
60 years ago Vector Control built their administrative office on Esplanade Street.
There was no lab in the administrative office, no chemical storage in the garage.
60 years ago they were not dealing with strong cancer causing chemicals and
infectious agents. This is a residential neighborhood with some commercial
buildings, no labs. Where in the code book does it say labs are allowed in the
PCU zoning? Lake County Vector Control states that they do not store pesticides
at the Esplanade facility. I have personally seen trucks unload pallets of
pesticides and chemicals on Esplanade Street to Lake County Vector Control. I
believe the workers then move them from Esplanade to their other facility on
Todd Road. Accidents can and do happen when unloading trucks as stated on
page 27 Response VIIIb.
2. PUBLIC PARKING
Public Parking for Vector Control was mitigated 17 years ago. In 1997 Vector
Control requested that they be allowed to build a new administrative office behind
their old office bldg. At that time there was concern for parking and ADA
requirements. The City mitigated the parking problem and Vector Control agreed
they were to remove their old office bldg. and use this space for parking. 17 years
later the neighborhood is still waiting for them to tear down the old office and
make a parking lot as they agreed to do. Currently the 35 C Street property is
being used as a parking lot. I have seen 7 pickup trucks parked at this location
and at least 5 jeeps or spray rigs inside the existing garage. They cannot possibly
have all their vehicles and 9 employee vehicles in the propsed new garage.
Please consider what hazard you are putting the neighborhood in along with the two
preschools located within a few blocks of Vector Control if an accident were to happen
at this location. I strongly feel that they have grown to the point that they need to find a
new location for handling their hazardous materials and infectious diseases. I feel Vector
ATTACHMENT 7
Attachment 2, pg 2
Control has done a good job but I think because of the advanced chemicals they use and
the infectious diseases they handle it needs to be moved outside of a residential
neighborhood.
Ron Bertsch
25 C Street
Lakeport, CA 95453
ATTACHMENT 7
Lakeport Chapter 17.16 REGULATIONS FOR PUBLIC AND CIVIC USES OR PCU ZONING DISTRICT
Attachment 3
Chapter 17.16
REGULATIONS FOR PUBLIC AND CIVIC USES OR PCU ZONING DISTRICT
Sections:
17.16.010 Purpose.
17.16.020 Uses permitted.
17.16.030 Development standards.
17.16.040 General plan consistency report.
17.16.010 Purpose.
To establish areas for public buildings and facilities. (Ord. 796 Att. A(part), 1999)
17.16.020 Uses permitted.
A. Public buildings.
B. Public libraries.
C. City, county, and state offices.
D. Fire and police stations.
E. Public schools.
F. Public corporation and maintenance yards.
G. Other public uses similar in character to those uses listed above.
H. Courthouses.
I. Fairgrounds. (Ord. 796 Att. A(part), 1999)
17.16.030 Development standards.
A. Minimum Lot Sizes.
1. Eight thousand square feet for an interior lot.
2. Eight thousand five hundred square feet for a corner lot.
B. Minimum Average Lot Width.
1. Interior lots: eighty feet.
The Lakeport Municipal Code is current through Ordinance 894, passed September 16, 2014.
Page 1 of 2
ATTACHMENT 7
Lakeport Chapter 17.16 REGULATIONS FOR PUBLIC AND CIVIC USES OR PCU ZONING DISTRICT
Page 2 of 2
Attachment 3, pg 2
2. Corner lots: eighty-five feet.
C. Maximum Length to Width Ratio. Three to one.
D. Maximum Lot Coverage.
1. One story structure: sixty percent.
2. Two story structure: fifty percent.
E. Maximum Floor Area Ratio: .35.
F. Minimum Yards.
1. Front yard: ten feet.
2. Rear yard: ten feet.
3. Side yard: zero feet, or ten feet from a lot line when contiguous to any residential district.
G. Maximum Height.
1. Principal structure: two stories or thirty-five feet.
2. Accessory structures: fifteen feet.
H. Parking. See Chapter 17.23.
I. Signs. See sign ordinance. (Ord. 796 Att. A(part), 1999)
17.16.040 General plan consistency report.
Prior to development, all uses allowed in the PCU district shall comply with the general plan
consistency report requirements set forth in the California Government Code. (Ord. 796 Att. A(part),
1999)
The Lakeport Municipal Code is current through Ordinance 894, passed September 16, 2014.
ATTACHMENT 8
ATTACHMENT 8
ATTACHMENT 8
ATTACHMENT 8
ATTACHMENT 8
ATTACHMENT 8
ATTACHMENT 8
ATTACHMENT 8
ATTACHMENT 8
ATTACHMENT 8
ATTACHMENT 8
ATTACHMENT 8
ATTACHMENT 8
ATTACHMENT 8
ATTACHMENT 8
ATTACHMENT 8
ATTACHMENT 8
ATTACHMENT 8
ATTACHMENT 8
ATTACHMENT 8
ATTACHMENT 8
ATTACHMENT 8
ATTACHMENT 8
ATTACHMENT 8
ATTACHMENT 8
ATTACHMENT 8
ATTACHMENT 8
ATTACHMENT 8
ATTACHMENT 8
ATTACHMENT 8
ATTACHMENT 8
ATTACHMENT 9
CITY OF LAKEPORT
PLANNING COMMISSION
SUPPLEMENTAL
MEMORANDUM
RE: Continuation of November 12, 2014 Public
Hearing for Lake County Vector Control
MEETING DATE: January 14, 2015
GPA 13-01 / ZC 13-01 / ER 13-01

SUBMITTED BY: Kevin M. Ingram, Community Development Director
PURPOSE OF REPORT:
Information only
Discussion
Commission Action
Please be advised that the memorandum included in the agenda packet regarding the
continuation of the Lake County Vector Control project mistakenly omitted one of the
original mitigation measures included in the Staff Report and Initial Study dated
September 25, 2014, regarding the requirement to submit a parking analysis in conjunction
with future project phases.
Listed below are the eleven mitigation measures set forth in the September 25, 2014 Staff
Report and Initial Study. As indicated in the continuation memorandum included in the
agenda packet, staff supports a Planning Commission recommendation to the City
Council for the adoption of a Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Lake County Vector
Control General Plan Amendment and Zone Change project as provided for in the
California Environmental Quality Act. Staff recommends approval of the proposed
General Plan Amendment and the proposed Zone Change as described in the November
12, 2014 staff report and subject to the mitigation measures set forth below.
A sample motion is provided in the continuation memorandum included in the agenda
packet.
1.
The applicant/owner shall maintain the temporary/interim parking area at 35 C Street

(former APN 025-501-39) with an adequate amount of road base to prevent the
generation of nuisance dust. The applicant/owner shall take the appropriate steps
to effectively reduce or eliminate dust problems if the City receives legitimate
complaints. The applicant/owner shall also ensure that the C Street right-of-way is
kept clear of any gravel/debris related to the interim parking lot. (Air Quality)
2.
The applicant/owner shall provide the City documentation which certifies the
Districts laboratory facilities, protocols and procedures. (Hazards and Hazardous
Materials)
ATTACHMENT 9

GPA 13-01/ZC 13-01/ER/13-01
Supplemental Continuation Memo 01/14/2015
3.
The applicant/owner shall adhere to all appropriate safety protocols related to

pesticide handling procedures and infectious agent research and shall maintain all
required laboratory certifications. (Hazards and Hazardous Materials)
4.
The future storm water drainage collection and conveyance facilities shall be
developed in accordance with the Citys storm water system regulations and the
approved plans and shall be completed prior to the issuance of a final occupancy
permit. (Hydrology and Water Quality)
5.
The future site improvements shall be subject to all requirements of Lakeport

Municipal Code Chapter 8.40 (Stormwater Management) and any subsequent
revisions or modifications thereof. All erosion control measures and construction and
post-construction stormwater Best Management Practices shall be completed in
accordance with the approved plan prior to the issuance of a final occupancy
permit. (Hydrology and Water Quality)
6.
The applicant/owner shall contribute the standard City storm water mitigation fee
based on the amount of new impervious surface area prior to the issuance of a
development permit associated with future site improvements. (Hydrology and
Water Quality)
7.
All future site improvements in the flood zone shall be developed in accordance with
the Citys Floodplain Management Ordinance (Lakeport Municipal Code Ch. 15.16),
including the submittal of adequately detailed construction plans prior to
construction. (Hydrology and Water Quality)
8.
All future new driveway approaches, handicapped ramps and other right-of-way
improvements shall be constructed to City standard and shall comply with the
requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act.
The future right-of-way
improvements shall be detailed on construction plans prepared by a registered civil
engineer. Said plans shall be submitted to the City Engineer for review and approval
prior to the issuance of an Encroachment Permit for work within the City right-of-way.
All City insurance requirements shall be met for work that occurs in the right-of-way.
The right-of-way improvements shall be completed prior to the issuance of a
certificate of occupancy for the new building. (Transportation/traffic)
9.
The applicant/owner shall provide at least 16 off-street parking spaces, including one
handicapped-accessible space in conjunction with future development projects on
the subject property. The handicapped-accessible spaces shall be van accessible.
All off-street parking spaces shall comply with the Citys standards in terms of width,
depth, and unobstructed back-up area. The handicapped parking spaces shall be
developed in accordance with the Americans with Disabilities Act in terms of size,
demarcation, and signage. Accessible paths of travel from parking areas to
buildings shall also be provided. (Transportation/traffic)
10.
The applicant/owner shall submit a parking analysis in conjunction with future project
phases. The parking analysis should evaluate and quantify the demand for parking
(both existing and long term) and provide long term design and development
solutions for the provision of an adequate amount of off street parking for the public,
District employees and District vehicles. At the Citys discretion, the recommended
number of off-street parking spaces may be modified based on the
findings/conclusions of the submitted parking analysis. (Transportation/traffic)
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Page 2
ATTACHMENT 9

GPA 13-01/ZC 13-01/ER/13-01
11.
Supplemental Continuation Memo 01/14/2015
Future parking areas shall be designed and developed in accordance with Lakeport
Municipal Code Chapter 17.23, including the provision of perimeter curbing in all
appropriate locations; traffic directional arrows and signage; and landscaping prior
to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy. All on-site parking lot striping,
directional arrows, traffic control markings and signage shall be maintained in the
future. (Transportation/traffic)
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Page 3
ATTACHMENT 10
ATTACHMENT 10
ATTACHMENT 10
ATTACHMENT 10
ATTACHMENT 10
ATTACHMENT 10
ATTACHMENT 10

Lakeport City Council Agenda Packet

Hochgeladen von

Dokumentinformationen

Originaltitel

Copyright

Verfügbare Formate

Dieses Dokument teilen

Dokument teilen oder einbetten

Freigabeoptionen

Stufen Sie dieses Dokument als nützlich ein?

Sind diese Inhalte unangemessen?

Copyright:

Verfügbare Formate

Lakeport City Council Agenda Packet

Hochgeladen von

Copyright:

Verfügbare Formate

AGENDA

REGULAR MEETING OF THE LAKEPORT CITY COUNCIL AND THE BOARD

CALL TO ORDER & ROLL CALL:

Move to accept agenda as posted, or move to add or delete items.

Waive reading except by title, of any ordinances under consideration at this

New Police Department Building

Adopt a resolution authorizing the acquisition of 2025 South Main Street,

Mark Ferguson of REMIF will present information regarding self-insurance.

Present Certificate of achievement from the CHP to the City of Lakeport in

Community Development Director

CITY COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS:

Introduce the proposed Zone Change Ordinance; and schedule a public

Miscellaneous Reports, if any:

EXPENSE APPROVAL REGISTER

Fund: 110 - GENERAL FUND

Fund: 501 - WATER UTILITY M & O FUND

Fund: 504 - USDA WATER PROJECT FUND

USDA WATER PROJECT

Fund: 601 - CLMSD UTILITY M & O FUND

Fund: 801 - OPEB AGENCY FUND

EXPENSE APPROVAL REGISTER

Packet: APPKT00011 - WARRANTS 02-10-2015

Project Account Summary

Payment Amount Number

Packet: APPKT00015-02-20-2015 WARRANTS

Packet: APPKT00015-02-20-2015 WARRANTS

Bank Code AP BANK Summary

Packet: APPKT00015-02-20-2015 WARRANTS

Payment Dates 2/25/2015 - 2/25/2015

Fund: 110 - GENERAL FUND

Department: 1020 - ADMINISTRATION

Department: 1041 - FINANCE

FINANCE OFFICE SUPPLIES

Department: 1050 - COMMUNITY DEV: PLANNING

CLASSIFIED ADS/RB16310 & RB 110-1050-922000

Department: 1051 - COMMUNITY DEV: BUILDING

ICC CERTIFICATION REIMB

Department: 1052 - ENGINEERING & INFORMATION TECH

Department: 2010 - POLICE

Payment Dates: 2/25/2015 - 2/25/2015

Department: 3020 - ROADS AND INFRASTRUCTURE

Department: 3030 - PARKS, BUILDINGS & GROUNDS

Payment Dates: 2/25/2015 - 2/25/2015

ROGER WHEELER LANDSCAPING 6398

MONTHLY MAINT/JAN 2015

Department: 3050 - WESTSHORE POOL

Fund: 210 - ECON RLF RE-USE FUND

Fund: 414 - STORM DRAINAGE FUND

Fund 110 - GENERAL FUND Total:

CLASSIFIED ADS/RB16310 & RB 210-1054-922000

Fund 210 - ECON RLF RE-USE FUND Total:

STORM DRAIN PROJECT

Fund 414 - STORM DRAINAGE FUND Total:

Fund: 501 - WATER UTILITY M & O FUND

CONF SPACE TRAINING

Department: 1041 - FINANCE

FINANCE OFFICE SUPPLIES

Department: 1052 - ENGINEERING & INFORMATION TECH

Department: 3060 - WATER MAINTENANCE & OPERATIONS

Fund 501 - WATER UTILITY M & O FUND Total:

Payment Dates: 2/25/2015 - 2/25/2015

Fund: 504 - USDA WATER PROJECT FUND

WATER SYSTEM PROJECGT