Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Purdue e-Pubs
International Compressor Engineering Conference
1976
This document has been made available through Purdue e-Pubs, a service of the Purdue University Libraries. Please contact epubs@purdue.edu for
additional information.
Complete proceedings may be acquired in print and on CD-ROM directly from the Ray W. Herrick Laboratories at https://engineering.purdue.edu/
Herrick/Events/orderlit.html
INTRODUCTION
The compressor model presented here has been developed to simulate overall performance of reciprocatin g
hermetic and non-hermetic refrigeratio n compressors
with a high degree of accuracy, while requiring a
minimum of inputs- UQlik~ other models developed
in recent years(l),(2 J,(3J, the present model was
created for use in total systems studies. Prerequisites were that the model, while containing
sufficient detail to permit accurate simulation of
internal compressor modificatio ns, be easily manipulatable, rapid, and inexpensive to run. The present
model can be easily used to study the effects of
many design changes, such as capacity control, or
internal heat transfer modificatio ns, on overall
compressor and overall system performance. The
above is achieved through the use of approximate
representat ions of valve dynamics, manifold pressure
pulsations, and manifold heat transfer, and hence
the present model is not suited to study factors
related specificall y to valve dynamics. If dynamic
valve motion is the topic Qf ~n)terest, more complex
models must be used.(4J,(5 J,(
1:
12
VERIFICATION OF MODEL
Three different compressors have been studied for
the purpose of verifying the present compressor
model:
1. Carrier 06D-824, a relatively large, semihermetic refrigeration compressor of nominal
9-ton capacity.
2-. Carrier 060-537, a large, semi-hermetic refrigeration compressor of nominal 14-ton capacity.
The 537 is a larger version of the 824 compressor above, having the same bore, but a
longer stroke.
3. A relatively small, nominal 3-ton, fully
hermetic refrigeration compressor. (Manufacturer wishes to remain unidentified.)
All necessary data for the above compressors has
been supplied by the manufacturers. Comparisons of
actual and predicted performance for the above compressors are given in Figures 3, 4, and 5, respec- tively.
13
REFERENCES
1.
2.
PARAMETRIC STUDIES
Results of parametr ic studies, showing effects of
changing the parameters given in Table 1 on capacity ,
power, and overall efficien cy, over the entire operating range of the 06D-537 compressor, are summarized
in Table 2. It is important to note that compressors
which are designed to have low values of es and eo
normally have high values o~ 6Ps and 6PD, and conversely, compressors with low values of 6Ps and 6PD
normally have higher values of es and eo. The effect
of varying oil circulat ion from 0 to 10 percent by
14
Proceed in
3.
4.
Table 1
SUMMARY OF NORMAL F.ANGE OF VALUES FOR INPUT
PARAMETERS OF COMPRESSOR SIHULIITION
3600 RPH
VERY SMALL
eD
0 - 10
05
0 -
lO - 30 psi
~PD
llP
MEDIUH
!.ii.RGE
VARIABL~
5 - 20
20
5 - 30
5 psi
,94 _ ,98
.90 _ .%
.85 _ ,90
11me:ch
.94- .98
.94- ,98
.92- .96
%MC
.so-
"is
0 -
%011
10 - 50
UNKNOWN
~si
S :psi
.88 _ .g5
,90 - .96
.80- l.O
.so- 1.0
.80- loO
MORE SUBJECT TO DESICN VARIATIONS
1.0
o-
5%
6T 5
Heat Trans.
o - 1o;;
J.O%
~TS
30F
I o~TS
50F
10%
50F
Whe;t;e:
SVR
2. B
i~
0 - 10
10 - 30 ps;_
5 psj,
l -
SMALL
0 -
20
10 - 30 psl
5 psi
1 -
SMALL
n (New
VERY' SMALL
8D
o::::
:c
-?-
>n
~n
4 < SVR
.6PD
llP S
~
J.S
11me.ch=
%MC
%Oil =
~l's
Coto.prcssor
Mech~nical
E:fficienc.y Due to
F~iction
Circol~ting
in Syste.m
Table 2
SUMMARY OF J:FFECTS OF VARYING INPUT PARAHEJERS ON
CARRIER MODEL 06D-537 COMPRESSOR PERFORMANCE
VARY
PROM - TO
PARAHETER
CHANGE IN
CHANGE CHANGE lN OVERALl.
J:FFICIENCY
IN FLOW POWER
(%)
(%)
REMA.l!.KS
(~)
BD
0 - 10 ATDC
-4%
-3%
or.
lnveJ;"sel.y -;r;eh.teQ to
llPD
es
0 - 20 ABDC
-4%
-4%
ox
Inve:rse.ly related to
~Ps
psi
-37
+3%
-3%
5 psi
-10%
-3%
-4%
~PD
10 -
~p s
1 -
30
~is
94 - 98%
+V~
-71.
+6?.
11 mec.h
94 -
gar
+2%
-4~o
+4%
loMC
80 - 100X
17.
OTHER
%Oil
Suct.~Disc~
Be::.tt
15
Trans~
0 - lOr
EFF~CTS
- Negligible
- Negl1.gibl(-' effect on flow~ power~ or overall
efficiency, but large effect on evaporar:o:r
cap . ~city (lOi. capacity reduction)
- 30F additional ~uperheat .'lt: low suc.t:ion
pre.s!'>UI"e :and. h;igh discharge pressure reduces
flow by 7% with negligible effect: on power~
ancl hence .re:duc.es overall c.omp:re:ssar
effic.ienc.y by 4%. At lower pressure t".'atios,
the additional superhear: is much le:ss, :'l.nd
the: e:ffe:c.t of suctlon-d:i.sch<~.rge heat transfer
iR negligible.
cmWARTSO~
200
--Actual
- 0 - Prerllcted
l5F "luperhe[-lt
0F Suhcoolin~
TDC
Coolinr,
Capacity
100
BDC
-~--TDG
e
Ternp~rature
Saturated Suc.tion
40
C'F) -
50
60
16
BDC
Intake
M;i.xing
With
Residual
Compression
Discharge
]10
Re-expana;i..on
Power
Input
10
(kw)
Figure 1
0
-10
10
20
30
40
50
t:;.aturar.ed Sucti.on 'T'cmueraturl;" ( 11 r) .......________
Figure 3
Discharge
Manifold
/_
Avg.
Pressure
Pressure
.....
Disc.
;~~~s.
Cylinder
PD
- ................
--- -- -- -
-~-- -......_~:.-
300
--Actual
-0- Prerl ic tert
15p
f:uT,~e:rheat
O~F !=:ubc.oolin~
Avg.
Suet.
Man.
Cooling
Capacity
Pr~ss.
0'
rnc
180
BDC
Crank Angte
360"
TDC
-~-~
Figure 2
10
20
Saturated c;11e;tlon
30
Temn~r:l.ture
-~
(~"F)--
50
60
22
'Power
J;nput
(kw)
~~lo~-~~----~l~0---~2to.----,,~n-----.~o~--~s~o----~,n
Saturattt!rl Suc.tion Temnern.ture
Figure 4
16
("F)~
-060
rr~di~te(l
ZO"F Superheat
O"F Subc.oolin~
50
Coolin~
<-"
<-''
<""'"~
40
"'
tu/h
~~
'\<>"'
......
""&#
c.';l.pac.ir.y
c~~oJ
""
30
,,..
,_.~
co
~~f;.,
20
10
0
-1
20
10
Saturated Suction
JO
't~mper'lture
40
60
50
(F)--------- -
00
Powe:r
I:nput
(kw)
0-
0
-1
20
10
Satm;'ate:d Suction
Jn
Te:rnperat1~re
40
50
60
("F)--
Figure 5
17