PostTV

Politics
Opinions
Local
Sports
National
World
Business
Tech
Lifestyle
Entertainment
Classifieds
Jobs
Real Estate
Events
Rentals
Cars
WP BrandConnect
Newsletters & Alerts
washingtonpost.com
1996-2015 The Washington Post
Help and Contact Us
Terms of Service
Privacy Policy
Submissions and Discussion Policy
RSS Terms of Service
Ad Choices

The Washington Post

Iran: The high-stakes issue that divides Netanyahu and Obama
Subscribe
Politics
Iran: The high-stakes issue that divides Netanyahu and Obama
Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Google Plus Share via Email More Options
Resize Text Print Article Comments

President Barack Obama and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu huddle during their joint news
conference in Jerusalem on March 20, 2013. (Pablo Martinez Monsivais/AP)
By Anne Gearan March 2 at 8:03 PM
The deep rift between the U.S. and Israeli governments has been growing steadily for some time, and
not just because President Obama and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu dont like one
another.

The split, laid bare by Netanyahus planned address to Congress on Tuesday, happened because of one
thing: Iran.

For Obama, Iran represents the potential to redeem a foreign policy ethos dented by six years in the
tough trenches of governing.

If he strikes a deal to roll back Irans feared nuclear program, Obama could make good on a now-hazy
campaign promise to productively extend a hand of peace to dictators. He might end more than three
decades of enmity between two great powers with much in common. He might be the American
president to go to Tehran the way Nixon went to China.

For Netanyahu, Iran is more than a well-armed enemy at his Mideast doorstep. Its the obsession of
Netanyahus political life, the alarm he has sounded for decades, his raison detre, his white whale.

VIEW GRAPHIC
Graphic: Iran's potential nuclear capability

I plan to speak about an Iranian regime that is threatening to destroy Israel, thats devouring country
after country in the Middle East, thats exporting terror throughout the world and that is developing, as
we speak, the capacity to make nuclear weapons, Netanyahu said Monday. Lots of them.

Obama began working to improve U.S. relations with Iran almost from the dawn of his administration.
He is now weeks away from the prospect of a historic deal to hobble Irans nuclear program, which the
White House argues would make the world, and especially Netanyahus neighborhood, a lot safer than it
is now.

Netanyahu, whose second term as prime minister began shortly after Obama took office in 2009, insists
that a negotiated agreement with Iran is a fools errand.

For the U.S.-educated Israeli leader, any deal that lets Iran retain its ability to make nuclear fuel
endangers Israel. And he says that the United States and other world powers negotiating the deal are
giving away the store by easing economic sanctions without an airtight guarantee that Iran can never
build a bomb.

His view finds many supporters in Congress, from both American political parties. The speech, to be
delivered over the objections of a White House that was not told of the invitation, is a rallying cry to
members of Congress to sunder the deal by piling on more sanctions.

The purpose of my address to Congress tomorrow is to speak up about a potential deal with Iran that
could threaten the survival of Israel, Netanyahu told the American Israel Public Affairs Committee on
Monday.

Obama is not addressing AIPAC this year. Neither is Vice President Biden, or Secretary of State John F.
Kerry.

Israels Netanyahu has respect for Obama(1:33)

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu insisted Monday that despite recent differences with the
Obama administration over Iran the alliance between his country and the Unites States is stronger than
ever. (AP)
Obama will not receive Netanyahu at the White House. The president didnt watch Netanyahus warmup speech to AIPAC on Monday, White House press secretary Josh Earnest told reporters.

As the prime minister of Israel, he can set his own schedule, Earnest said. And he gets to take the
actions that he believes are consistent with his own objectives, whatever they may be.

The invitation to address Congress, however, violated years of protocol in which foreign leaders speak at
the behest of both Congress and the sitting president.

As prime minister of Israel, I have a moral obligation to speak up in the face of these dangers while
theres still time to avert them, Netanyahu said Monday.

Netanyahu used his AIPAC appearance to warn that Iran is already the foremost state sponsor of
terrorism in the world, a charge U.S. officials dont make as often as they used to.

Iran envelops the entire world with its tentacles of terror. This is what Iran is doing now without
nuclear weapons. Imagine what Iran would do with nuclear weapons, Netanyahu said. And this same
Iran vows to annihilate Israel. If it develops nuclear weapons, it would have the means to achieve that
goal. We must not let that happen.

He reminded his audience that Israel is a small democracy, an outpost of decency and progressive mores
in a dark, and savage, and desperate Middle East.

He invoked the persecution of Jews over millennia, and he invoked the Holocaust.

The days when the Jewish people are passive in the face of threats to annihilate us, those days are
over, Netanyahu thundered.

And this was supposed to be the boring speech, the one that the famously theatrical Israeli leader would
use to temper the fireworks to come on Tuesday.

The congressional speech amounts to a writing-off of Netanyahus already abysmal personal relationship
with Obama, with nearly two years to go until a new U.S. president takes over. Netanyahu faces a tight
reelection contest this month but is considered likely to retain the prime ministers office.

Obama considers Netanyahu a bully and a showboat, U.S. and Israeli officials said in interviews ahead of
the speech.

Netanyahu considers Obama callow and bloodless, those officials said. The Israeli regarded Obamas first
election as a fluke and assumed it could not be repeated, he told associates ahead of Obamas 2012
reelection.

Stuck with one another, the two leaders have mostly kept up appearances for the sake of a national
alliance that both vow cannot be broken. Iran has been the chief irritant since 2013, with the White
House fuming at what it saw as Netanyahus open attempt to sink a deal it has painstakingly nurtured.

The international talks face an end-of-March deadline.

Both Netanyahu and U.S. officials stressed Monday that the U.S.-Israel bond will survive.

Netanyahu ticked off several past examples of tension, including the suspension of American arms
transfers over the 1981 Israeli military strike that destroyed an Iraqi nuclear reactor.

Netanyahu didnt mention then-Secretary of State James A. Bakers famous 1990 put-down, when he
told Congress that Israel should call us when youre serious about peace. Baker then read out the
number of the White House switchboard.

None of the past splits were permanent, Netanyahu said.

Were like a family. Were practically mishpocha, he said, using a Yiddish word for a family network or
clan.

Now, disagreements in the family are always uncomfortable, but we must always remember that we
are family.

Now that the dirty laundry is flapping, U.S. officials were cordial Monday.

We believe firmly that Israels security and the U.S.-Israeli partnership transcends politics and always
will, the U.S. ambassador to the United Nations, Samantha Power, told the AIPAC audience.

Power defended the Obama administrations approach to negotiation with Iran and pledged anew that
the United States wont allow Iran to develop a nuclear weapon. She reassured the audience that
American military force remains an option if diplomacy fails.

Maybe the president has made this point so often that it isnt heard in the same way anymore, but we
have to keep repeating it, Power said.

Talks, no talks, agreement, no agreement, the United States will take whatever steps are necessary to
protect our national security and that of our closest allies, she said.

We believe diplomacy is the preferred route to secure our shared aim. But if diplomacy should fail, we
know the stakes of a nuclear-armed Iran as well as everyone here. We will not let it happen.

Anne Gearan is a national politics correspondent for The Washington Post.

SHARE ON FACEBOOK
SHARE ON TWITTER
COMMENTS
Get Politics
Free daily updates delivered just for you.

Most Read Politics

1
Hacked emails indicate that Hillary Clinton used a domain registered the day of her Senate hearings
2
Hillary Clinton used private e-mail for government business at State Dept.
3

Portrait artist says he painted Lewinsky reference in Bill Clinton's official painting
4
These states are poised to allow people to carry hidden guns around without a permit
5
Netanyahu says no 'disrespect' meant to Obama
The Most Popular All Over

The Dodo
12 Pets Who Are Totally You And Your Sibling

The Baltimore Sun

Ray Rice's wrongful termination grievance against Ravens was settled for $1.588 million

The Atlantic
A Brewing Problem

Our Online Games

Play right from this page

sudoku
Sudoku
Genre(s): Strategy
Put on your Sudoku hat and get ready for a challenging Sudoku puzzle!

daily-crossword
Daily Crossword
Genre(s): Word
Same fun of crosswords but online!

masque-just-words
Just Words
Genre(s): Word
Get ready to be wowed with wonderful word fun!

html5-trizzle
Trizzle
Genre(s): Strategy
Experience the joy of Trizzle!

washingtonpost.com
1996-2015 The Washington Post

Help and Contact Us

Terms of Service
Privacy Policy
Submissions and Discussion Policy
RSS Terms of Service
Ad Choices