Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
h i g h l i g h t s
" The polypropylene bers had caused delay in starting the degradation process.
" Reinforcement potential increased as the amount of bers increased from 0 to 2 kg m
3
" The corrosion rate in coral concrete is more than twice that in siliceous concrete.
" We concluded coral aggregates are not suitable for using in concrete structures.
" We used NDT methods (electrical resistivity, permeability) for concrete examine.
a r t i c l e
i n f o
Article history:
Received 19 December 2011
Received in revised form 8 March 2012
Accepted 25 April 2012
Keywords:
Corrosion
Permeability
Fibers reinforced concrete
Polypropylene
a b s t r a c t
One effective method for preventing corrosion of steel reinforcement and improving the mechanical
properties of concrete is changing the physical nature of concrete by adding different materials. In this
study, we have used polypropylene bers as an additional material. We have compared the corrosion rate
of rebar using different volume ratios and sizes of polypropylene bers. Reinforcement potential
increased as the amount of bers increased from 0 to 2 kg m3. The polypropylene bers delay the initial
corrosion process by preventing cracking, thereby decreasing permeability of the concrete. In addition,
the corrosion rate of concrete samples made with Kish Island coral aggregate was compared to samples
made with a siliceous aggregate. The corrosion rate in this concrete is more than twice that in siliceous
concrete. We concluded that coral aggregate is improper for making concrete and using in concrete structures in the onshore atmosphere.
2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction
It is generally understood that the initially protective environment that concrete provides for steel is due to the alkaline nature
of concrete. This is usually reected in passive or nobler corrosion
potentials (or Ecorr values) for steel in concrete. When aggressive
ions such as chlorides penetrate into concrete, the environment
can become favorable for steel corrosion [1,2]. When aggressive
ions reach the critical amounts, the potentials become more active,
and thus a shift in Ecorr values is often associated with the intrusion
of aggressive ions. This will cause the corrosion rate to increase.
When rebar embedded in concrete corrodes, the corrosion products slowly gather around the surface of the bar, taking more space
and applying pressure to the encasing concrete, leading to cracks.
The crack widths propagate in proportion to the degree of loss of
Corresponding author. Tel.: +60 45996161; fax: +60 45941011.
1
0950-0618/$ - see front matter 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.04.051
rebar mass [3]. There are observable cases where concrete will
be exposed in marine environments or bridge decks subjected to
deicing salts that are replete with chloride ions [47]. Diffusion
of chloride into concrete that is exposed to the marine environment will decrease over time due to the hydration of the concrete,
making the concrete pore structure more dense, or removing chloride ions by binding [8]. Other factors can also have affected this
process, such as the amount of cover, the method and length of
consolidation and curing, and the water/cement ratio (w/c), but
it seems that permeability plays the main role. We can potentially
decrease this permeability by the addition of polymer bers and
the encasement of concrete in a polymer resin or polymer composite [5]. Additionally, ber reinforced concrete has a longer service
life in comparison with other types of concrete because of its resistance to corrosion and chemicals [9]. Payrow et al. mentioned that
the appearance of post-peak residual strength of concrete members in bending was the best benet of the using bers in concrete
as reinforcement [10].
565
Table 1
The raw materials used in the presented mixture design.
Water
Cement
Aggregate
w
c
190 kg m3
400 kg m3
1760 kg m3
0.48
Table 2
Physical characteristics of polypropylene bers.
Specic gravity
Diameter
Width crossing
Melting point
Water absorption
Torsion resistibility
0.91g cm3
22 lm
Circular
160170 C
0
400350 MPa
566
Fig. 2. Polarization curves of concrete samples with different volumetric amount of polypropylene bers after 5 days exposure in sea water. Numbers (15) indicate
volumetric amount of polypropylene ber as follows: 1 = 0.5 kg m3, 2 = 1 kg m3, 3 = 1.5 kg m3, 4 = 2 kg m3, and 5 = 0 kg m3 polypropylene bers.
Fig. 3. Polarization curves of concrete samples with different volumetric amounts of polypropylene bers after 50 days exposure in sea water. Numbers (14) indicate
volumetric amount of polypropylene ber as follows: 1 = 0.5 kg m3, 2 = 1 kg m3, 3 = 1.5 kg m3, and 4 = 2 kg m3 polypropylene bers.
Fig. 4. Polarization curves of concrete samples with different volumetric amounts of polypropylene bers after 100 days exposure in sea water. Numbers (14) indicate
volumetric amount of polypropylene ber as follows: 1 = 0.5 kg m3, 2 = 1 kg m3, 3 = 1.5 kg m3, and 4 = 2 kg m3 polypropylene bers.
the other concrete samples. This sample was very prone to corrosion. The concrete sample with 1 kg m3 of ber also had a lower
tendency toward corrosion and was in a passive state. As the curves
show increasing polypropylene ber ratio caused a noticeable
567
Fig. 5. Polarization curves of concrete samples with different volumetric amount of polypropylene bers after 150 days exposure in sea water. Numbers (15) indicate
volumetric amount of polypropylene ber as follows: 1 = 0.5 kg m3, 2 = 1 kg m3, 3 = 1.5 kg m3, 4 = 2 kg m3, and 5 = 0 kg m3 polypropylene bers.
Increasing the number of bers has a direct relation to permeability. It causes concrete samples to become denser with lower
permeability. It means that a progressively smaller number of ions
enter the concrete samples. So corrosion potential will be more
positive and current density of corrosion will be lower [20,21]. Corrosion of rebar in the concrete sample with 2 kg m3 ber content
was severely increased after 150 days exposure in sea water. The
corrosion potential was decreased to the same level as in the concrete sample without bers. Fig. 5 shows the concrete sample with
1.5 kg m3 bers content after 150 days exposure in seawater. It
was more passive and had a more suitable degree of corrosion
resistance compared to the other concrete samples. This is because
the amount of bers has a direct inuence on the efciency of ber
reinforcement and the degree of rebar corrosion in concrete [17].
Fig. 6. Polarization curves of concrete samples with different sizes of polypropylene bers after 5 days exposure in sea water. Numbers (13) indicate the size of
polypropylene ber as follows: 1 = 6 mm, 2 = 12 mm, and 3 = 19 mm.
568
Fig. 7. Polarization curves of concrete samples with different size of polypropylene bers after 50 days exposure in sea water. Numbers (13) indicate the size of
polypropylene ber as follows: 1 = 6 mm, 2 = 12 mm, and 3 = 19 mm.
Fig. 8. Polarization curves of concrete samples with different size of polypropylene bers after 100 days exposure in sea water. Numbers (13) indicate the size of
polypropylene ber as follows: 1 = 6 mm, 2 = 12 mm, and 3 = 19 mm.
Fig. 9. Polarization curves of concrete samples with different size of polypropylene bers after 150 days exposure in sea water. Numbers (13) indicate the size of
polypropylene ber as follows: 1 = 6 mm, 2 = 12 mm, and 3 = 19 mm.
factors are not taken together with other parameters related to the
corrosion kinetics.
3.4. Corrosion rate of concrete samples
Fig. 12 shows a comparison of corrosion rate of concrete samples with different volumetric amount of polypropylene bers. As
shown, the concrete sample with 2 kg m3 of ber has the lowest
569
Fig. 13. Corrosion current changes of concrete samples with different ber sizes;
Numbers (13) indicate the size of polypropylene ber as follows: 1 = 6 mm,
2 = 12 mm, and 3 = 19 mm.
Table 3
Electrical resistivity of concrete samples with different volumetric ratio of polypropylene ber.
p (KX cm)
MSP0.5L19
MSP1L19
MSP1.5L19
MSP0
CSP0
1314
1419
1118
1415
1114
Fig. 11. Corrosion current density (icorr) versus time (days); Numbers (15) indicate
volumetric amount of polypropylene ber as follows: 1 = sample with coral
aggregate without polypropylene ber, 2 = 0 kg m3, 3 = 0.5 kg m3, 4 = 1 kg m3,
and 5 = 1.5 kg m3 polypropylene bers.
Measuring of electrical resistance is clearly described in a scientic paper by Ferreira and Jalali [28]. Electrical resistance of concrete samples was shown in Table 3. Electrical resistance is
dependent on the continuous hydration of cement and it varies in
correspondence to the changes in concrete [28]. Electrical resistance of produced concrete samples consisting of 1 kg m3 and
1.5 kg m3 bers had maximum values compared to other samples.
This is because of the decrease in corrosion induced by the electrical
current.
The concrete sample with coral aggregate was shown to have
the lowest electrical resistance. The decrease in electrical resistance is related to presence of chlorides components in coral
aggregate.
3.7. Oxygen permeability of concrete samples with different volumetric
ratio of polypropylene bers
Fig. 12. Corrosion rate of concrete samples with different volumetric amounts of
polypropylene bers; Numbers (15) indicate volumetric amount of polypropylene
ber as follows: 1 = sample with coral aggregate without polypropylene ber,
2 = 0 kg m3, 3 = 0.5 kg m3, 4 = 1 kg m3, 5 = 1.5 kg m3, and 5 = 2 kg m3 polypropylene bers.
The importance of measuring the concrete moisture is to determine the gas permeability. Therefore, it should be conducted in
such a way as to neutralise the moisture effects. In this regard the
electrical resistivity q should be determined, which can be measured by the four electrode method. For this purpose, the circuit
was between two external electrodes and the potential reduction
was measured between the two internal ones. A repeatable laboratorial method was properly obtained by comparing the results of
KT, q and Ko (oxygen permeability factor) which can be applied
for columns, the samples made up of different concrete mixtures
of different amounts of moistures. Formulas (1) and (2) were used
for dry concrete and moisture concrete, respectively.
570
Table 4
Permeability factor of different concrete samples in 3 months exposure in sea water.
Time (day)
16
KT (10
1
5
9
15
25
30
35
40
62
92
Concrete samples
MSP0.5L19
MSP1L19
MSP1.5L19
MSP2L19
MSP0
CSP0
References
3.2
0.046
0.119
0.131
0.025
0.007
0.093
0.077
0.234
0.03
3.01
0.038
0.150
0.103
0.015
0.007
0.073
0.047
0.135
0.07
8.25
0.083
0.091
0.031
0.03
0.122
0.64
0.103
0.894
1.06
13.58
0.58
0.335
0.05
0.04
0.974
0.111
0.106
0.435
0.98
[1] Spainhour LK, Wootton IA. Corrosion process and abatement in reinforced
concrete wrapped by ber reinforced polymer. Cem Concr Compos
2008;30(6):53543.
[2] Kobayashi K et al. Corrosion protection performance of high performance ber
reinforced cement composites as a repair material. Cem Concr Compos 2010;
32(6):41120.
[3] Hassan AAA, Hossain KMA, Lachemi M. Corrosion resistance of selfconsolidating concrete in full-scale reinforced beams. Cem Concr Compos
2009;31(1):2938.
[4] Bezerra E, Joaquim A, Savastano H. The effect of different mineral additions and
synthetic ber contents on properties of cement based composites. Cem Concr
Compos 2006;28(6):55563.
[5] Wheat H. Using polymers to minimize corrosion of steel in concrete. Cem
Concr Compos 2002;24(1):11926.
[6] Monticelli C, Frignani A, Trabanelli G. A study on corrosion inhibitors for
concrete application. Cem Concr Res 2000;30(4):63542.
[7] Stratfull R. Half-cell potentials and the corrosion of steel in concrete. Highway
Res Rec 1973:433.
[8] Song H-W, Lee C-H, Ann KY. Factors inuencing chloride transport in concrete
structures exposed to marine environments. Cem Concr Compos 2008;30(2):
113121.
[9] Galvn C, Gutirrez J. Corrosion-resistant bre-reinforced concrete mix. US
Patent App. 20,090/301,353; 2006.
[10] Payrow P et al. Effect of surface treatment on the post-peak residual strength
and toughness of polypropylene/polyethylene-blended ber-reinforced
concrete. J Compos Mater 2011;45(20):204754.
[11] Gonzalez JA, Andrade C. Effect of carbonation, chlorides and relative ambient
humidity on the corrosion of galvanized rebars embedded in concrete. Br
Corros J 1982;17:218.
[12] Garca-Alonso M et al. Corrosion behaviour of new stainless steels reinforcing
bars embedded in concrete. Cem Concr Res 2007;37(10):146371.
[13] Davidson, A. Reducing cracking damage due to thermal and external loads
using polypropylene ber in concrete beams; 2009.
[14] Pelisser F et al. Effect of the addition of synthetic bers to concrete thin slabs
on plastic shrinkage cracking. Constr Build Mater 2010.
[15] Subramaniam KV, Bi M. Investigation of steel corrosion in cracked concrete:
Evaluation of macrocell and microcell rates using Tafel polarization response.
Corros Sci 2010;52(8):272535.
[16] Sanjuan M, Andrade C, Bentur A. Effect of polypropylene bre reinforced
mortars on steel reinforcement corrosion induced by carbonation. Mater
Struct 1998;31(5):3439.
[17] Haddad R, Ashteyate A. Role of synthetic bers in delaying steel corrosion
cracks and improving bond with concrete. Can J Civil Eng 2001;28(5):78793.
[18] Ismail M et al. Effect of crack opening on the local diffusion of chloride in
cracked mortar samples. Cem Concr Res 2008;38(89):110611.
[19] Kakooei S et al. The effects of polypropylene bers on the properties of
reinforced concrete structures. Constr Build Mater 2012;27(1):737.
[20] Aggregate G. ASTM C33. Uniformly graded and clean. Aggregate, Coarse.
[21] Grten A, Erbil M, KayakIrIlmaz K. Effect of polyvinylpyrrolidone on the
corrosion resistance of steel. Cem Concr Compos 2005;27(78):8028.
[22] Al-Tayyib A, Mesfer M. Corrosion of steel reinforcement in polypropylene ber
reinforced concrete structures. ACI Mater J 1990;87(2).
[23] Assouli B, Ballivy G, Rivard P. Inuence of environmental parameters on
application of standard ASTM C87691: half cell potential measurements.
Corros Eng, Sci Technol 2008;43(1):936.
[24] Bayasi Z, Zeng J. Properties of polypropylene ber reinforced concrete. ACI
Mater J 1993;90(6).
[25] Toutanji H, McNeil S, Bayasi Z. Chloride permeability and impact resistance of
polypropylene-ber-reinforced silica fume concrete. Cem Concr Res 1998;
28(7):9618.
[26] Tehada T, Funahashi M. Cathodic protection of building reinforcing steel. In:
Tri-service corrosion conference; 2005.
[27] Wattanachai P, et al. A study on chloride ion diffusivity of porous aggregate
concretes and improvement method. E 2009;65(1):3044.
[28] Ferreira RM, Jalali S. NDT measurements for the prediction of 28-day
compressive strength. NDT & E Int 2010;43(2):5561.
[29] Rose A, Suguna K, Ragunath P. Strengthening of corrosion-damaged reinforced
concrete beams with glass ber reinforced polymer laminates. J Comput Sci
2009;5(6):4359.
[30] Wei T. Experimental investigation on chloride permeability of concrete
containing polypropylene bers. Fujian Build Mater 2009.
m )
6.962
0.062
3.692
2.563
2.413
0.082
0.115
0.039
0.810
0.024
2.58
0.160
0.173
0.150
0.068
0.061
0.045
0.614
0.301
0.905
0:4
1
0:7
=q
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank Mr. Ray Lingel for the English
editing of this manuscript. Facilities and funding for this study
were provided by Kish University, Iran. Also authors would like