Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Historical Roots
Early history
•Rerum Novarum (1891)
•Turn of century legislative reform
movement
•Quadragesimo Anno (1931)
Modern living wage movement
•Baltimore Living Wage Act (1994)
•London Living Wage Campaign (2001)
•London Living Wage Unit (2004)
Living Wages
The Critics
• A wage floor is harmful to low wage workers,
employers and society as a whole
– Low wage workers become unattractive to
potential employers
– Increased cost of living reduces buying power of
low wage earners, leaving them no better off
– Costs of production, inefficiency and inflation are
also increased
• There are less disruptive ways of delivering
income to the poor
Living Wages
The Proponents
• The academic literature:
– Living wage provisions are not found to be associated
with job losses or worker displacement
– There is evidence of productivity increases
– Increased cost pressure provides incentives for firms to
seek efficiency and cost savings elsewhere
• London Economics Study (2009)
– Benefits: recruitment & retention, absenteeism & sick
leave, productivity, morale & motivation, reputation,
employee financial & welfare benefits, workplace change
– ‘There is a real business case for organizations to
implement the London Living Wage.’ (p. 4)
Living Wages
For the Debate
Decent work
Forms of capital
Livelihoods
LED & VCA & Inclusive growth
Direct transfers
Access
Basic needs
Vulnerability
Living Wages
EC Findings - What’s ahead?
-Adjusted cost of living used for relocated managers
-Research and plan for smaller margins
-Campaign or legislate retailers
-Government use of an inclusive tri-partite process
-Campaign & work with employers to implement living
wage
-FLA wage ladder
-Integrate living wage into a social audit
Living Wages
Your views…