Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
** N.SELVARAJU
Guide
Investigator
ABSTRACT
This article explained the relationship between homework and achievement in mathematics
of higher secondary students.The investigator used the survey method for data collection.The
population of the present investigation is all the higher secondary students of various school from
Virudhunagar District in Tamilnadu. From the population 300 students were randomly selected as
the sample for the study. The data were treated with the help of statistical procedures such as mean,
standard deviation t test and F test. The finding revealed thatthere is no positive relationship
between achievement and homework in mathematics of higher secondary students.
INTRODUCTION
Education is the process of bringing desirable changes in the behaviour of human beings. It
can also be defined as the process of imparting or acquiring knowledge and habits, through
instruction or study. Education comprises instruction, teaching, information gathering, knowledge
gathering and transmittance, study and reflection, discussion, demonstration of pilot programmes.
Imparting knowledge is only a fragment of education. Real education strives to awaken curiosity of
children, develop creative and critical thinking in them and inculcate desirable values.
Education is the means to a better way of living for many and for others. It is the process of
teaching required skills. Education is concerned with teaching the members of the society how they
are expected to behave in variety of selected situations. Education is an activity or a process, which
transforms the behaviour of a person from instinctive behaviour to human behaviour.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------.
* Guide,Assitent Professor in Mahatma Gandhi college of Education, Tirunelveli.
** Investigator, M.Ed., scholar,-Mahatma Gandhi college of Education, Tirunelveli.
Study No: 2
Huang and Tzufang (2009) attempted a study on the role of task-specific adapted knowledge
of response feedback in algebra problem solving online homework in a college remedial course.
objectives
The purpose of the study was to examine the effects of different types of online
homework feedback on algebra problem solving skills and achievement in a college remedial
algebra course. Two types of feedback were verification feedback and task- specific adapted
knowledge of response feedback. Problem solving skills were measured by content
understanding, problem solving strategies and selfregulation, Achievement was measured by an
online intervention homework assignment, a test a final exam and a final course grade. The
participants were student in a remedial algebra course at a university in California. Fifty
voluntary students were randomly assigned into the control group receiving verification feedback
or the experiment group receiving task-specific adapted knowledge of response feedback. All 50
students also learned individual help-seeking strategies.
Finding
The major findings of this study were there was no significant difference between
experimental groups and control groups in content understanding, problem solving strategies, selfregulation and achievement there was no difference between two groups could be due to either
cognitive overload or limited functionality of My Math Labs fools or learner control or trial and
error strategy
METHODOLOGY
METHOD USED IN THE STUDY
The investigators useda survey method for the study.
POPULATION FOR THE STUDY
The population for the present study are higher secondary students in virudhunagar district.
SAMPLE FOR THE STUDY
The investigators have used simple random sampling technique for selecting the higher
secondary students in virudhunagar district. The investigator selected 300students from 8 schools in
this district, giving importance to gender and location of the college.
TOOLS USED IN THE PRESENT STUDY
By keeping the various objectives of the study in mind the investigator has used the following tools.
1. Homework scale prepared and validated by (2011) M.Leelavathi has been adopted.
2. The marks secured by the students in the half-yearly examination have been taken as
achievement mark.
STATISTICAL TECHEIQUES USED IN THE PRESENT STUDY
The investigators have used the following statistical techniques.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Percentage Analysis
Arithmetic Mean
Standard Deviation
T test
Anova test
Chi-square test
Karl Pearsons Product Moment Correlation
ANALYSIS OF DATA
Objective: 1
To find out whether there is any significant difference between homework and its
dimensions with respect to gender.
LEVEL OF HOMEWORK AND ITS DIMENSIONSWITH RESPECT TO GENDER
TABLE 4.2
Dimensions
Student
Involvement
Teacher
Involvement
Parent
Involvement
Homework-in
Total
Null Hypotheses: 1
Gender
Low
Moderate
High
Count
Count
Count
Male
43
28.1
87
56.9
23
15.0
Female
17
11.6
103
70.1
27
18.4
Male
57
37.3
78
51.0
18
11.8
Female
15
10.2
85
57.8
47
32.0
Male
28
18.3
94
61.4
31
20.3
Female
23
15.6
107
72.8
17
11.6
Male
51
33.3
73
47.7
29
19.0
Female
22
15.0
82
55.8
43
29.3
There is no significant difference between male and female homework and its dimension
with respect to gender.
TABLE 4.14
DIFFERENCE BETWEEN MALE AND FEMALE HOMEWORK AND ITS DIMENSION
WITH RESPECT TO GENDER
Dimensions of
Homework
Student
Involvement
Teacher
Involvement
Parent
Involvement
Homework
in Total
Category
Count
Mean
S.D
Male
153
54.72
5.253
Female
147
56.50
3.919
Male
153
25.16
4.164
Female
147
28.14
2.409
Male
153
13.71
3.060
Female
147
13.39
2.605
Male
153
98.70
12.04
8
Female
147
103.46
9.116
Calculated
t value
Remarks at
5% level
3.32
7.53
0.98
NS
3.84
Null Hypotheses: 2
There is no significant difference among homework and its dimensions with respect to type
of school.
TABLE 4.17
DIFFERENCE AMONG HOMEWORK AND ITS DIMENSIONS WITH RESPECT TO
TYPE OF SCHOOL
Dimensions of
Homework
Student
Involvement
Teacher
Involvement
Parent
Involvement
Homework-in
Total
Sources
of
variation
df = 2,297
Sum of squares
Mean square
Between
410.327
205.163
Within
Between
Within
Between
6266.060
24.496
4120.184
6.009
21.098
12.248
13.873
3.004
Within
2416.138
8.135
Between
2240.776
112.388
Within
33649.954
113.300
Calculated
F value
Remarks
at 5% level
9.724
0.883
NS
0.369
NS
9.889
FINDINGS
1. There is no significant difference in parent involvement of higher secondary students
with respect to gender. But,there is significant difference in student involvement,
teacher involvement and homework-in total of higher secondary students with respect
to gender.
2. There is no significant difference in student involvement, teacher involvement, parent
involvement and homework-in total of higher secondary students with respect to type
of family.
INTERPRETATION
Thet test reveals that female students are better than the male students in their homework
in mathematics in student involvement, teacher involvement and homework in total. This may
be due to the reason that, normally female students are more involvement in their studies. The
female students finished their homework regularly and oftenly recall.
The F test reveals that aided school students are better than government and selffinanced schools students in their homework in mathematics and in their dimension, namely
student involvement, usefulness of subject. This may be due to the reason that aided schools
have more facilities and better taken care of and students may be under good discipline
compared with the government school students. The aided schools have committed staff they
are more creative in teaching and utilizing the available facilities than the government and unaided schools.
RECOMMONDATION
1
Students can be encouraged to realize the importance of homework, for better realization
SUGGESTION
1
2
CONCULUTION
The objective of the present investigator was to study the homework of higher secondary
students in mathematics. This study may be found to be useful in the field of education. The
recommendations given by the investigator may be very helpful for improving the homework of
higher secondary students in mathematics. Hence the investigator concluded that the motivation
given by parents and teachers are the key to improve the achievement of the students in
mathematics in positive way.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
BOOKS
1. Aggarwal,J.C.,(2005). Principles, Methods and Techniques of Teaching, 2nd revised
edition, Vikas publishing hiusePvt, Ltd, New Delhi.
2. Anice James,(2006). Methods of Teaching Mathematics Neelkamal publications
Pvt.Ltd,Hyderabad.
3. Arbind Kumar Jha,(2006). Homework Education, Atlantic Publishers and Distributors
Pvt.Ltd, New Delhi.
4. Bhandarkar, K M and Pathan,S.N.,(2007) Statistics In Education, Neelkamal
Publication Pvt.Ltd, New Delhi
5. Bhatta, B.D,(1970). Theory and Principles of Education of Education,Doaba House,
New Delhi.
JOURNALS
1. Amalraj.A and Anantha V.G, (2006).Study habits of higher secondary students in relation
tothe-Home Climate, Research and Reflections on Education, Vol.04, No.03, July
September 2006.
2. Jagannath.K et al., (2008) attempted a study on need of homework in secondary school.
INTERNATIONAL ABSTRACTS
Iflazoglu et al.,(2012) Homework motivation and preferences of turkish students
Dissertation abstracts International Vol. 27, No. 03.
Omlin-Ruback Holly I., (2010).A study of Mathematics homework, Dissertation Abstracts
International Vol. 70, No. 11, May 2010.
WEBSIDES
www.eric.com
www.acadamicresearch.com
www.education.world.com
www.indian.journal.com
www.netguide.com
www.wikipedia.com