Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Bragg-Williams Theory
As noted in Chapter 11, an alternative mean-field approach is to derive a free energy, F , in
terms of our order parameter,m, and then minimize F with respect to m.
We begin with a slightly different definition for m,
m=
(N N )
N
(13.1)
N
S = kB ln
N
N!
= kB ln
(13.2)
N (1+m)
N (1m)
!
!
2
2
Applying Stirlings approximation, the above equation reduces to,
N (1 + m)
N (1 + m)
N (1 + m)
S = kB [N ln N N {
ln
2
2
2
N (1 m)
N (1 m)
N (1 m)
+
ln
}]
2
2
2
N (1 + m)
N (1 + m) (1 + m)
= kB [N ln N N {
ln N +
ln
2
2
2
N (1 + m) N (1 m)
N (1 m) (1 m) N (1 m)
+
ln N +
ln
}]
2
2
2
2
2
N (1 + m) (1 + m) N (1 m) (1 m)
= kB
ln
ln
2
2
2
2
and hence,
1
1
S
= kB ln 2 (1 + m) ln(1 + m) (1 m) ln(1 m)
s(m)
N
2
2
(13.3)
87
where, again, q = 2d is the lattice coordination number or the number of nearest neighbour
sites for a d-dimensional hypercubic lattice.
Let us now write down the free energy for this system, we have:
F (T, m)
E TS
=
N
N
1
1
= Jqm2 + kB T [(1 + m) ln(1 + m) + (1 m) ln(1 m)]
2
2
kB T ln 2
f (T, m)
(13.5)
1 4s
1 2s
2
m +
m4 + . . .
(13.6)
s(m) = s(0) +
2
4
2! m m=0
4! m m=0
where,
and,
2s
m2
4s
m4
=
m=0
kB
(1 + m)(1 m)
= 2kB
m=0
= kB
m=0
1 m2 + 2m
(1 + m)3 (1 m)3
= 2kB
m=0
s(m) = kB
1
1
ln 2 m2 m4 + . . .
2
12
(13.7)
1
1 2
1
2
f (m) = kB T ln 2 + Jqm + kB T m + kB T m4
2
2
12
or
1
T m4
f (m)
= (T Tc )m2 +
T ln 2
kB
2
12
(13.8)
88
It is clear from the above equation that for T > Tc , the minimum in the free energy occurs
for m = 0. For T < Tc , where does the minimum in f (m) occur?
f (m)/k
4T m3
= (T Tc )m +
=0
m
12
3(Tc T )
m2 =
T
or
m= 3
1/2
Tc
1
T
(13.9)
which is the same result as derived for the Weiss Molecular Field theory!
To explicitly see the behaviour of the free energy, as a function of the order parameter m,
in the vicinity of Tc , refer to the following figure,
h=0
F
T>Tc
T=Tc
T<Tc
13.1
Let us now consider our system of spins in the presence of an external magnetic field, h,
such that the free energy becomes f f hm. Referring to Eq. 13.5 we have,
1
1
f (T, m) = Jqm2 hm + kB T [(1 + m) ln(1 + m) + (1 m) ln(1 m)] kB T ln 2
2
2
(13.10)
Minimizing the above expression with respect to m we have,
f
1
1+m
= Jqm h + kT ln
=0
m
2
1m
89
1
1+m
h = Jqm + kT ln
2
1m
1
m3 m5
= Jqm + kT m +
+
+ . . . , |m| < 1
2
3
5
= Jqm + kT tanh 1m, or
h
Tc
m = tanh
+ m
kT
T
(13.11)
which again is the same result that we obtained from the Weiss Molecular Field Theory
model.
13.2
Using the expression for the average energy, Eq. 13.4 with the mean field result, Eq. 13.9,
we have,
N Jq
E '
3
2
Tc T
T
3N Jq
3N k
E
=
'
Ch |T Tc =
T T Tc
2Tc
2
(13.12)
(13.13)
Since m = 0 for T > Tc , this implies the average energy and, hence, the heat capacity are
zero as we approach Tc from the positive side. The qualitative behaviour of the heat capacity
actually demonstrates a cusp discontinuity, as seen below.
This behaviour is in contrast to more exact theories and experiments which demonstrate a power law dependence of the heat capacity,
Ch = B |T Tc |
(13.14)
90
Cv
discontinuity at T
Tc