Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Urban Studies
115
Urban Studies Journal Limited 2014
Reprints and permissions:
sagepub.co.uk/journalsPermissions.nav
DOI: 10.1177/0042098014552933
usj.sagepub.com
Tim Schwanen
University of Oxford, UK
Abstract
Academic research tends to overlook what happens when night falls. This special issue aims to bring the
spacetime of the urban night to the fore by asking how nocturnal cities are produced, used, experienced
and regulated in different geographical contexts. Despite local variations and specificities important similarities and ongoing transformations are identified regarding the long-term trends in the formation of the
spacetimes of the urban night. We have structured this special issue on the basis of four important focal
points of research for studying the night: (1) changing meanings and experiences of urban darkness and
nights; (2) the evolution of the night-time economy; (3) the intensification of regulation; and (4) dynamics
in practices of going out. By bringing different sets of literature and theoretical perspectives together this
special issue provides a relational perspective on the urban night.
Keywords
governance, night-time economy, night-time spaces, nightlife, urban darkness
Received July 2014; accepted July 2014
Downloaded from usj.sagepub.com at Univ of Newcastle upon Tyne on February 12, 2015
Urban Studies
Theoretical considerations
In The Production of Space, Henri Lefebvre
(1991[1974]) was one of the pioneers seeking
to explain how certain activities (especially
illegal ones) came to be permitted in particular areas at night. Williams (2008) builds on
Lefebvres framework and argues that nighttime spaces are socially mediated and constituted: night spaces do not exist prior to, or
apart from, human practices and the attendant social relationships that seek to appropriate, even to control, the darkness. Night
spaces are constituted by social struggles
about what should and should not happen
in certain places during the dark of the night
and who is welcome where (Williams, 2008:
514). The Lefebvrian perspective espoused
by Williams is very useful in understanding
the social construction of the night. The production of nightlife is, however, more than a
struggle over ideas and representations and,
as the contributions to this special issue
attest, other theoretical perspectives can be
brought to bear productively on the social
construction of the urban night. These
include, but are certainly not limited to,
Downloaded from usj.sagepub.com at Univ of Newcastle upon Tyne on February 12, 2015
The global diffusion of the urban nighttime economy: originating in the UKs
post-industrial cities, strategies to (re)position the urban night in terms of economic opportunity and revitalise (parts
of) city centres, which are underpinned
by rationalities of urban competitiveness
in a globalising economy have steadily
Downloaded from usj.sagepub.com at Univ of Newcastle upon Tyne on February 12, 2015
Urban Studies
diffused
through Europe,
North
America and Australasia and are now
also pursued, albeit in modified form, in
cities in the global South (on Jakarta,
see Tadie and Permanadeli, 2014).
Increased regulation to curb the excesses
of the night-time economy in response
to moral panics about binge-drinking
and other forms of intoxication and the
related health risks (Hadfield et al.,
2009; Measham and stergaard, 2009;
Roberts and Eldridge, 2009), as well as
broader rationalities and strategies organised around the perceived need to
obstruct the circulation of unwanted
elements (aggressive, violent visitors)
and avoid the disruption of desired
forms of circulation (consumers who
spend money).
A growth of new forms of consumption
and entertainment in the global North:
whilst youth have been colonising
urban night-time spaces organised
around consumption and entertainment
for several decades, this group is increasingly diversified as a result of globalisation and migration. Ethno-parties, and
the rise of Asian night markets in the
global North, are good examples of the
impact of globalisation on nightlife
trends (Hou, 2010; Pottie-Sherman and
Hiebert, 2013).
(3)
(4)
Downloaded from usj.sagepub.com at Univ of Newcastle upon Tyne on February 12, 2015
Downloaded from usj.sagepub.com at Univ of Newcastle upon Tyne on February 12, 2015
Urban Studies
Downloaded from usj.sagepub.com at Univ of Newcastle upon Tyne on February 12, 2015
Downloaded from usj.sagepub.com at Univ of Newcastle upon Tyne on February 12, 2015
Urban Studies
Downloaded from usj.sagepub.com at Univ of Newcastle upon Tyne on February 12, 2015
Contributions
Our ambition with this special issue is to
deepen our understanding of ongoing and
current transformations in how the space
times of the urban night are produced, used,
experienced and regulated in different geographical contexts. By bringing four sets of
literature together the changing meanings
and experiences of urban darkness and
nights, the evolution of urban night-time
economies, the intensification of regulation
and the dynamics in practices of going out
we provide a relational perspective on the
urban night. The individual contributions to
this special issue examine these transformations from at least one perspective, but some
of the articles are also connected through
cross-cutting subthemes. As explained
Downloaded from usj.sagepub.com at Univ of Newcastle upon Tyne on February 12, 2015
10
Urban Studies
Downloaded from usj.sagepub.com at Univ of Newcastle upon Tyne on February 12, 2015
11
Downloaded from usj.sagepub.com at Univ of Newcastle upon Tyne on February 12, 2015
12
Urban Studies
Chinese night markets in a Canadian suburb. One aspect of diaspora culture finds
itself seriously mismatched with the realities
of life in the suburbs of Vancouver as the
Chinese culture of late day bluntly contrasts with the quiet Richmond landscape
after 6 pm.
What happens at night in the city is clearly
more than just economy, it is also about
meeting others, creating identities and having
fun. Gallan posits that nightlife spaces are
important for cities, and also for the subcultures and music preferences of young people.
This article seeks to revisit Foucaults understanding of the temporalities of heterotopia
by describing the complexities and experience
of marginal space. Based on a case study, the
author defines how going out to the Oxford
Tavern in the Australian city of Wollongong
can be a spacetime in which significant rites
of passage are experienced and remembered.
Similarly, Roberts contribution is about the
social practices of a big night out and adds
an interesting dimension to research on the
geographies of going out. It shows that spatiality plays a significant role in the formation
of drinking experiences, cultures and the production of atmosphere, based on research in
two different British regions about the way in
which young (mainstream) people understand
the city centres at night to be their space
time and as culturally and economically
approved sites for the performance of their
rituals (pre-loading, drinking, bar-hopping,
dancing and late-night snacking). Within socalled drinking circuits, the feeling of territoriality turns out to be very important: being
recognised and respected in an environment
where people behave similarly.
Finally, Hubbard and Colosi explore the
gender dimension of the night-time city in
England and Wales. They argue that the existence of gentlemens clubs at the heart of the
city underlines the gendered nature of the
night-time economy, a spacetime which continues to privilege the male sexual gaze by
putting women on display for mens consumption. The removal of these clubs has
been hailed by some as an important step in
the creation of more gender-equal cities, challenging long-standing assumptions that
womens access to nightlife can only be on
mens terms.
Funding
The authors work on this editorial introduction
and the special issue has been supported by grant
MVI-313-99-140 Surveillance in Urban Nightscapes by the Netherlands Organization for
Scientific Research (NWO). The continued support of Jon Bannister and Ruth Harkin for the
special issue and the effort and patience of the
contributing authors are gratefully acknowledged.
Note
1. Both governmentality and biopower are
understood in various ways in contemporary
social science. Foucault himself understood
the former in different ways, including as the
conduct of conduct (Gordon, 1991: 2) the
activities by any agent to shape the actions of
others and/or the self and as a specific style
of governing others and the self. Biopower
has usefully been defined as a field comprised
of more or less rationalized attempts to intervene upon the vital characteristics of human
existence (Rabinow and Rose, 2006: 197).
References
Adey P (2009) Facing airport security: Affect,
biopolitics, and the preemptive securitisation
of the mobile body. Environment and Planning
D: Society and Space 27(2): 274295.
Amoore L (2006) Biometric borders: Governing
mobilities in the war on terror. Political Geography 25(3): 336351.
Anderson T (2009) Better to complicate, rather
than homogenize, urban nightlife: A
response to Grazian. Sociological Forum
24(4): 918925.
Bannister J, Fyfe N and Kearns A (2006) Respectable or respectful: (In)civility and the city.
Urban Studies 43(56): 919937.
Downloaded from usj.sagepub.com at Univ of Newcastle upon Tyne on February 12, 2015
13
Bianchini F (1995) Night cultures, night economies. Planning Practice and Research 10(2):
121126.
Bigo D (2002) Security and immigration: Toward
a critique of the governmentality of unease.
Alternatives 27: 6392.
Boogaarts S (2008) Claiming your place at night:
Turkish dance parties in the Netherlands.
Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 34(8):
12831300.
Boogaarts de Bruin S (2011) Something for Everyone? Changes and Choices in the Ethno-Party
Scene in Urban Nightlife. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
Bose M (2005) Difference and exclusion at work
in the club culture economy. International
Journal of Cultural Studies 8(4): 427444.
Brands J, Schwanen T and van Aalst I (2013)
Fear of crime and affective ambiguities in the
night-time economy. Urban Studies DOI:
10.1177/0042098013504009.
Brenner N and Theodore N (2002) Cities and the
geographies of actually existing neoliberalism. Antipode 34(3): 349379.
Bromley RD and Nelson AL (2002) Alcoholrelated crime and disorder across urban space
and time: Evidence from a British city. Geoforum 33(2): 239254.
Cattan N and Vanola A (2013) Gay and lesbian
emotional geograhies of clubbing: Reflections
from Paris and Tunis. Gender, Place and Culture DOI: 10.1080/0966369X.
Chatterton P (1999) University students and city
centres The formation of exclusive geographies: The case of Bristol, UK. Geoforum
30(2): 117133.
Chatterton P and Hollands R (2002) Theorising
urban playscapes: Producing, regulating and
consuming youthful nightlife city spaces.
Urban Studies 39(1): 95116.
Chatterton P and Hollands R (2003) Urban
Nightscapes. Youth Cultures, Pleasure Spaces
and Corporate Power. London and New York:
Routledge.
Comedia Consultancy (1991) Out of Hours: A Study
of Economic, Social and Cultural Life in Twelve
Town Centres in the UK. London: Comedia.
Crawford A and Flint J (2009) Urban safety,
anti-social behaviour and the night-time
Downloaded from usj.sagepub.com at Univ of Newcastle upon Tyne on February 12, 2015
14
Urban Studies
Downloaded from usj.sagepub.com at Univ of Newcastle upon Tyne on February 12, 2015
15
Morris N (2011) Night walking: Darkness and sensory perception in a night-time landscape installation. Cultural Geographies 18(3): 315342.
Nasaw D (1999) Going Out: The Rise and Fall of
Public Amusements. Boston, MA: Harvard
University Press.
Nelson A, Bromley R and Thomas C (2001) Identifying micro-spatial and temporal patterns of
violent crime and disorder in a British city centre. Applied Geography 21(3): 249274.
OBrien K, Hobbs D and Westmarland L (2009)
Negotiating violence and gender: Security and
the night time economy in the UK. In: BodyGendrot S and Spierenburg P (eds) Violence in
Europe: Historical and Contemporary Perspectives. New York: Springer, pp. 161176.
Pain R, MacFarlane R, Turner K et al. (2006)
Qualifying GIS and the effects of streetlighting
on crime and fear. Environment and Planning
A 38(11): 20552074.
Painter K (1996) The influence of street lighting
improvements on crime, fear and pedestrian
street use, after dark. Landscape and Urban
Planning 35(23): 193201.
Pottie-Sherman Y and Hiebert D (2013) Authenticity with a bang: Exploring suburban culture
and migration through the new phenomenon
of the Richmond night market. Urban Studies
DOI: 10.1177/0042098013510 954.
Rabinow P and Rose N (2006) Biopower today.
BioSocieties 1(2): 195217.
Roberts M (2013) A big night out: Young peoples drinking, social practice and spatial experience in the liminoid zones of English nighttime cities. Urban Studies DOI: 10.1177/
0042098013504005.
Roberts M and Eldridge A (2009) Planning,
urban design and the night-time city: Still at
the margins? Criminology and Criminal Justice
9(4): 487506.
Robinson J (2010) Cities in a world of cities: The
comparative gesture. International Journal of
Urban and Regional Research 35(1): 123.
Rutherford S (2007) Green governmentality: Insights
and opportunities in the study of natures rule.
Progress in Human Geography 31(3): 291307.
Sage J, Smith D and Hubbard P (2013) New-build
studentification: A panacea for balanced communities? Urban Studies 50(13): 26232641.
Downloaded from usj.sagepub.com at Univ of Newcastle upon Tyne on February 12, 2015