Sie sind auf Seite 1von 86

PROJECT REPOT

ON
WORKING CAPITAL MANAGEMENT AND
RATIO ANALYSIS
At
TATA STEEL

Content
S. No

TOPIC

PAGE NO

1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
OBJECTIVE OF STUDY
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
COLLECTION OF DATA
COMPANY PROFILE
SWOT ANALYSIS
WORKING CAPITAL
NET WORKING CAPITAL
FINANCIAL RATIOS OF TATA STEEL
COMPARITIVE ANALYSIS OF TATA STEEL, SAIL,

06
07
07
08
09
15
16
25
28
38

11.
12.
13.
14.

JSW
FINANCIAL RATIOS OF TATA STEEL, SAIL, JSW
RECOMMENDATION
CONCLUSION
BIBLIOGRAPHY

48
84
85
86

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Different businesses will have different working capital characteristics. There are 3 main aspects to these
differences:
a) Holding inventory
b) Taking time to pay suppliers and other accounts payable
c) Allowing customers (accounts payable) time to pay
a) Food supermarkets and other retailers receive most of their sales in the form of cash, credit card or
debit card. However, they will buy on credit from suppliers. They will therefore have the benefit of
significant cash holdings which they may chose to invest.
b) A wholesaler supplies other companies and is likely to buy and sell mainly on credit. The flow of
cash will have to be managed carefully. Such a company may have to rely on short-term borrowings and
overdrafts.
c) Small companies with a limited trading record may find it difficult to obtain trade credit. At the same
time customers will expect to receive the normal credit period to settle accounts.
Working capital is the capital required for maintenance of day-to-day business
operations. The present day competitive market environment calls for an efficient management of working
capital. The reason for this is attributed to the fact that an ineffective working capital management may force
the firm to stop its business operations, may even lead to bankruptcy. Hence the goal of working capital
management is not just concerned with the management of current assets & current liabilities but also in
maintaining a satisfactory level of working capital. Holding of current assets in substantial amount
strengthens the liquidity position & reduces the riskiness but only at the expense of profitability. Therefore
achieving risk-return trade off is significant in holding of current assets. While cash outflows are predictable
it runs contrary in case of cash inflows. Sales program of any business concern does not bring back cash
immediately. There is a time lag that exists between sale of goods & sales realization. The capital
requirement during this time lag is maintained by working capital in the form of current assets. The whole
process of this conversion is explained by the operating cycle concept.
Working capital management involves the relationship between a firm's shortterm assets and its short-term liabilities. The goal of working capital management is to ensure that a firm is
able to continue its operations and that it has sufficient ability to satisfy both maturing short-term debt and
upcoming operational expenses. The management of working capital involves managing inventories,
accounts receivable and payable, and cash.

There are many ratios that can be calculated from the financial statements pertaining to
a company's performance, activity, financing and liquidity. Some common ratios include the price-earnings
ratio, debt-equity ratio, earnings per share, asset turnover and working capital.
3

OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY

TATA STEEL has been managing the various aspect of working capital through continuous efforts over a
long period of time.
The present study is trying to investigate the different aspects of working capital
management at TATA STEEL. Working capital is generally the net difference between the total assets
and the liabilities of the company. So an attempt to understand as to how the company manages the
working capital has been done.
In my project work we are trying to identify the various systematic processes in
managing the working capital.
The study is trying to identify the various liquidity, profitability, solvency and the
turnover positions of the company as a tool of performance which will lead us to identify the financial
soundness of the company.

RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
The study will be based on the QUANTATIVE and QUALITATIVE approach of the working capital
management model at TATA STEEL needs a thorough study. With the help of RATIO ANALYSIS &
TREND ANALYSIS the result of the control mechanism can be summarised which will help in
identifying the effectiveness of the system under the preview. The data for the companies under
analysis has been taken from their respective websites of the companies. `MICROSOFT EXCEL has
been used as a tool for different calculation purposes and developing the charts.

COLLECTION OF DATA:
The data has been collected from the primary and secondary sources:
i) Primary data
(1) Department visit- discussion with the concerned person and interviewing officers in accounts
and finance sector.
(2) Observation method.
ii) Secondary data
(1) Annual reports
(2) Journals and magazines
(3) Study of files and office documents
4

(4) Websites of TATA STEEL and other steel companies.

CHAPTER: - 2 COMPANY PROFILE

The Tata Group of Companies has always believed strongly in the concept of collaborative growth, and this
vision has seen it emerge as one of India's and the world's most respected and successful business
conglomerates. The Tata Group has traced a route of growth that spans through six continents and embraces
diverse cultures. The total revenue of Tata companies, taken together, was 67.4 billion USD (around
Rs319,534 crore) in 2009-10, with 57 per cent of this coming from business outside India. In the face of
trying economic challenges in recent times, the Tata Group has steered Indias ascent in the global map
through its unwavering focus on sustainable development. Over 395,000 people worldwide are currently
employed in the seven business sectors in which the Tata Group Companies operate. It is the largest
employer in India in the Private Sector and continues to lead with the same commitment towards social and
community responsibilities that it has shown in the past.

The Tata Group of Companies has business operations (114 companies and subsidiaries) in seven defined
sectors Materials, Engineering, Information Technology and Communications, Energy, Services,
Consumer Products and Chemicals. Tata Steel with its acquisition of Corus has secured a place among the
top ten steel manufacturers in the world and it is the Tata Groups flagship Company. Other Group
Companies in the different sectors are Tata Motors, Tata Consultancy Services (TCS), Tata
Communications, Tata Power, Indian Hotels, Tata Global Beverages and Tata Chemicals.

Tata Motors is Indias largest automobile company by revenue and is among the top five commercial
vehicle manufacturers in the world. Jaguar and Landrover are now part of Tata Motors portfolio.

Tata Consultancy Services (TCS) is an integrated software solutions provider with delivery centres in more
than 18 countries. It ranked fifth overall, and topped the list for IT services, in Bloomberg Businessweek's
12th annual 'Tech 100', a ranking of the world's best performing tech companies.

Tata Power has pioneered hydro-power generation in India and is the largest power generator (production
capacity of 2300 MW) in India in the private sector.

Indian Hotels Company (Taj Hotels, resorts and palaces) happens to be the leading chain of hotels in India
and one of the largest hospitality groups in Asia. It has a presence in 12 countries in 5 continents.

Tata Global Beverages (formerly Tata Tea), with its major acquisitions like Tetley and Good Earth is at
present the second largest global branded tea operation.

When Jamshedji Tata gave shape to his vision of nation building by forming what was to become the Tata
Group in 1868, he had envisaged India as an independent strength politically, economically and socially. In
order to become a force that the world has to reckon with, the Tata Group has always ventured into path
breaking territory and pioneered developments in industries of national importance.

As a policy, the Tata Group Companies promote and encourage economic, social and educational
development in the community, returning wealth to the society they serve. Two-thirds of the equity of Tata
Sons is held in philanthropic trusts that take care of endowments towards improvement programmes in these
spheres.

Through the years, the Tata Group has been amongst the most prestigious corporate presences in the world
governed by its principles of business ethics. Its foray into international business has been recognised by
various bodies and institutions. Brand Finance, a UK based consultancy firm after a recent valuation of the
Tata brand at $11.22 billion has ranked it 65th among the world's top 100 brands. In Business
Week magazine's list of the 25 most innovative companies the Tata name appears 13th and The Reputation
Institute, USA has evaluated the Tata Group as the 11th in a global study of the most reputed companies.

In the road ahead, the Tata Group is focusing on integration of new technologies in its operations and
breaking new grounds in product development. The Eka supercomputer had been ranked the worlds fourth
6

fastest in 2008 and the launch of the Nano has been a benchmark for the auto industry specifically and the
economy in general.

With a holistic approach in all its business operations, a loyal and dedicated workforce and its rooted belief
in value creation and corporate citizenship, the Tata Group is always ready to realise its vision and
objectives. The challenges of the future will only help to enhance the Groups performance and transform
newer dreams to reality.

FOUNDERS OF TATA STEEL


JAMSEDJI NUSSERWANJI TATA (1839 1904)
He was a visionary behind Tata Steel .He realized that Indias real freedom depended upon its selfsufficiency in scientific knowledge, power and steel, thus devoted the major part of his life, and his fortune
to three great enterprises-The Indian institute of Science at Bangalore, the Hydro-electric schemes and the

Iron & Steel Works at Jamshedpur .He envisaged and conceived a steel
town to the very last detail, later to be named as Jamshedpur.
J.N. Tata had exhorted to his sons to pursue and develop his lifes work ;
his elder son, Sir Dorabji Tata(1859-1933) carried out the bequest with
scrupulous zeal and distinction .Thus , even though it was Jamshedji Tata
who had envisioned the mammoth projects, it was in fact Dorabji Tata who
actually brought the ventures to existence and fruition. He was the first
chairman of the gigantic Tata enterprises.
It was in 1907 that the village of Sakchi was discovered at the confluence of two rivers, Subarnarekha and
Kharkhai and the railways station of Kalimati .The Tata Iron and Steel Company was floated.
SIR DORABJI TATA (1859 1933)
Sir DorabjiTata(1859-1933) carried out the bequest with scrupulous zeal
and distinction.
Thus , even though it was Jamshedji Tata who had envisioned the
mammoth projects, it was in fact Dorabji Tata who actually brought the
ventures to existence and fruition. He was the first chairman of the gigantic
Tata enterprises.

BHARAT RATNA JEHANGIR RATANJI DADABHAI TATA (1904 1993)

J.R.D.Tata has been one of the greatest builders and personalities of modern
India in the twentieth century.
He assumed Chairmanship of Tata Steel at the young age of 34, but his
charismatic, disciplined and forward looking leadership over the next 50 years
led the Tata Group to new height of achievement, expansion and
modernization.
His style of management was to pick the best person for the job at hand and let
him have the latitude to carry out the job. He was never interested for MicroManagement. It was he who zeroed in on Sumant Moolgaokar, the engineering
genius who successfully steered our company for many years. He was a visionary whose thinking was far
ahead of his time, which helped Tata Group launching its own Airlines, now known as Air India. He was
awarded the countrys highest civilian honor, The Bharat Ratna in 1992.

RATAN NAVAL TATA


Ratan Navel Tata was born on December 28, 1937, in Surat. He is the
present Chairman of Tata Group, Indias largest conglomerate founded by
Jamshedji Tata and consolidated and expanded by later generation of his
family. He is one of the most well-known and respected industrialists in
India.
Tata was born into wealthy and famous family of Mumbai. His
childhood was troubled as his parents separated in the mid-1940s,
when he was about seven and his younger brother was five. His
mother moved out and both he and his brother were raised by his grandmother Lady Navarjbai.
Ratan Tata completed his degree in architecture with structural engineering from Cornell University in 1962,
and the Advance management Program from Harvard Business School in 1975. He joined the Tata Group in
December 1962 on the advice of JRD Tata. He was first sent to Jamshedpur to work at Tata steel. He worked
on the floor with the other blue collar employees, shoveling limestone and handling the blast furnaces. He
was appointed the Director In Charge of The National Radio & Electronics Company Limited (Nelco) in
1971 and was successful in turning Nelco around.

LIST OF BOARD OF DIRECTORS

Board of Directors

Ratan N Tata

Chairman

H M Nerurkar

Managing Director

Subodh Bhargava

Independent, Non-Executive Director

Andrew Robb

Independent, Non-Executive Director

Ishaat Hussain

Non Executive, Non Independent Director

Cyrus Pallonji Mistry

Additional Director

B Muthuraman

Vice Chairman

Nusli N Wadia

Independent, Non-Executive Director

Jacobus Schraven

Independent, Non-Executive Director

S M palia

Independent, Non-Executive Director

Karl-Ulrich Koehler

Non Executive, Non Independent Director

Mallika Srinivasan

Additional Director

10

AWARDS AND RECOGNITIONS


CORPORATE AWARDS

The Businessworld Most Respected Company Award 2011 in the Metals category.

Recognised as Indias Most Admired Knowledge Enterprise (MAKE) Award Winner 2010 at the
CII KM India Summit 2010.

Awarded Asia MAKE (Most Admired Knowledge Enterprise) Award 2010. This is the seventh
time that the Company was conferred with this honour.

Tata Steel Europe awarded the Lifecycle Analysis Leadership Award 2010.

Awarded Steel Industry Website of the Year 2010 by the World Steel Association.

Tata Steel won the following awards at Asias Best Employer Awards hosted by the Employer
Branding Institute in Singapore in July 2010: the Award for Talent Management, the Award for Best
HR Strategy in line with Business and the Award for Excellence in Training.

Tata Steel Processing and Distribution Limited won the JIPM Award for 2009, awarded by the
Japan Institute of Plant Management, for excellence in TPM in plant operations.

FE-EVI Green Business Leadership Award 2009-2010.

AWARDS FOR EXCELLENCE IN CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY


Conferred with the Safety and Health Excellence Recognition Award 2010 by the World Steel
Association.

Awarded the Rashtriya Khel Protsahan Puruskar for the second consecutive year.

Recognised in six of the seven categories at the annual awards function organised by the Joint
Committee on Safety, Health and Environment in Steel Industry (JCSSI).

Awarded the CSR Excellence Award 2010 by ASSOCHAM, National CSR Committee and CSR
Organising Committee.

Awarded the Businessworld-FICCI-SEDF Corporate Social Responsibility Award 2009.

Awarded the Best Corporate Social Responsibility Practice at the 6th Social and Corporate
Governance Awards 2010 by the Bombay Stock Exchange.

NatSteel awarded the Platinum HEALTH Award 2010 by the Singapore Health Promotion Board.

NatSteel conferred with the Work-Life Excellence Award 2010 by the Singapore Ministry of
Manpower for the fourth consecutive time.

11

TOP COMPETITORS OF TATA STEEL

Jindal Steel
SAIL
Essar steel

SOME OTHER MAJOR PLAYER IN THIS INDUSTRY

Saw pipes
Uttam steel Ltd
Ispat industry Ltd
Mukand Ltd
Mahindra Ugine steel co. Ltd
Ushaispat Ltd
Kalyani steel Ltd
Electro steel casting Ltd
Sesa Goa Ltd

SWOT ANALYSIS
12

STRENGTH:

Strong brand name like Tata Steel & Corus


Indian operation capable of meeting its own requirement
Strong supply chain for raw material leading sales & distribution
Low cost, high skilled labor.

WEAKNESS:

Low R & D Investment


Unscientific mining method
Technologically backward
Low productivity

OPPURTUNITY:

Unexplored rural markets


Growing domestic market
Growing global market
Carbon trade
High investment in infrastructure sector

THREATS:

Major player entering Indian market


China set to become a net exporter
High duties and taxes from the government
Environmental concerns & laws
Global slowdown

13

CHAPTER.3. WORKING CAPITAL MANAGEMENT


WHAT IS WORKING CAPITAL???
Working capital is the cash needed to pay for the day to day operation of the business. Working capital is a
financial metric which represents operating liquidity available to a business, organization or other entity,
including governmental entity. Along with fixed assets such as plant and equipment, working capital is
considered a part of operating capital. Net working capital is calculated as current assets minus current
liabilities.. It is a derivation of working capital, that is commonly used in valuation techniques such as DCFs
(Discounted cash flows). If current assets are less than current liabilities, an entity has a working capital
deficiency, also called a working capital deficit.
A company can be endowed with assets and profitability but short of liquidity if its assets cannot
readily be converted into cash. Positive working capital is required to ensure that a firm is able to continue
its operations and that it has sufficient funds to satisfy both maturing short-term debt and upcoming
operational expenses. The management of working capital involves managing inventories, accounts
receivable and payable, and cash.
Working capital management is a very important component of corporate finance because it directly
affects the liquidity and profitability of the company. It involves the decision of the amount and composition
of current assets and the financing of these assets. Efficient working capital management involves planning
and controlling current assets and current liabilities in a manner that eliminates the risk of inability to meet
due short term obligations on the one hand and avoid excessive investment in these assets on the other hand.
Working capital means that part of the total assets of the business that change from one form to
another form in the ordinary course of business operations. Also known as revolving or circulating capital
or short-term financial management it is nothing but the difference between current assets and current
liabilities. The word working capital is made of two words- Working & Capital. The word working
means day to day operation of the business, whereas the word capital means monetary value of all assets
of the business. Working capital is of major importance to internal and external analysis because of its close
relationship with the current day-to- day operations of a business.
Every business needs funds for two purposes.
Long term funds are required to create production facilities through purchase of fixed assets such as
plants, machineries, lands, building, etc.
Short term funds are required for the purchase of raw materials, payment of wages, and other dayto-day expenses.
14

Working capital management deals with the management of these short term funds.
The constituents of current assets & current liabilities is as follows-

CURRENT ASSETS

CURRENT LIABILITIES

1. INVENTORY
a) RAW MATERIAL
b)WORK-IN-PROGRESS
c) FINISHED GOODS
d) OTHERS
2. TRADE CREDITORS
3. LOANS AND ADVANCES

1. SUNDRY CREDITORS
2. TRADE ADVANCES
3. BORROWINGS (short term)
a) COMMERCIAL BANKS
b) OTHERS
4. PROVISIONS

4.CASH AND BANK BALANCE

WORKING CAPITAL COMPRISES OF THE FOLLOWING:1. Cash and cash equivalents: - This most liquid form of working capital requires constant
supervision. A good cash budgeting and forecasting system provides answers to key questions such
as:
Is the cash level adequate to meet current expenses as they come due?
What is the timing relationship between cash inflow and outflow?
When would cash need occur?
When and how much bank borrowing will be needed to meet any cash shortfalls?
When will repayment be expected and will the cash flow cover it?
2. Accounts receivables: - Many businesses extend credit to their customers.
If you do, is the amount of accounts receivable reasonable relative to sales?
How rapidly are receivables being collected?
Which customers are slow to pay and what should be done about them?

3.

Inventory: - Inventory is often as much as 50 percent of a firm's current assets, so naturally it


requires continual scrutiny.

15

Is the inventory level reasonable compared with sales and the nature of your business?
What's the rate of inventory turnover compared with other companies in your type of business?
4. Accounts payable: - Financing by suppliers is common in small business; it is one of the major
sources of funds for entrepreneurs.
Is the amount of money owed suppliers reasonable relative to what you purchase?
What is your firm's payment policy doing to enhance or detract from your credit rating?
5. Accrued expenses and taxes payable: - These are obligations of your company at any given time
and represent a future outflow of cash.

THERE ARE TWO DIFFERENT CONCEPTS OF WORKING CAPITAL:-

16

1. Balance sheet or Traditional concept - It shows the position of the firm at certain point of time. It is
calculated in the basis of balance sheet prepared at a specific date. In this method there are two types of
working capital:a) Gross working capital - It refers to the firms investment in current assets. The sum of the current assets
is the working capital of the business. The sum of the current assets is a quantitative aspect of working
capital. Which emphasizes more on quantity than its quality, but it fails to reveal the true financial position
of the firm because every increase in current liabilities will decrease the gross working capital.
b) Net working capital - It is the difference between current assets and current liabilities or the excess of
total current assets over total current liabilities. It is also can defined as that part of a firms current assets
which is financed with long term funds. It may be either positive or negative. When the current assets
exceed the current liability, the working capital is positive and vice versa.
2. Operating cycle concept - The duration or time required to complete the sequence of events right from
purchase of raw material for cash to the realization of sales in cash is called the operating cycle or working
capital cycle

17

Debtors and bills


recievable
Cash

Sales

Operating cycle

Raw material

Finished goods

Work-in-progress

18

The investment in working capital is influenced by four key events in the production & sales cycle of the
firm:
Purchase of raw materials.
Payment of raw materials.
Sale of finished goods.
Collection of cash for sales.
The firm begins with the purchase of raw materials which are paid after a delay which represents the
accounts payable period. The raw materials are then converted into finished goods which are then sold.
The time lag between the purchase of raw materials and the sale of finished goods is called the inventory
period. The time lag between the date of sales & the date of collection of receivables is the accounts
receivable period. The time lag between purchase of raw materials & the collection of cash for sales is
referred to as operating cycle. The time lag between payment for raw material purchases & the collection
of cash for sales is referred to as cash cycle.

19

IMPORTANCE OF WORKING CAPITAL


The advantages of working capital or adequate working capital may be enumerated as below: 1. Cash Discount:
If a proper cash balance is maintained, the business can avail the advantage of cash discount by
paying cash for the purchase of raw materials and merchandise. It will result in reducing the cost of
production.
2. It creates a Feeling of Security and Confidence:
The proprietor or officials or management of a concern are quite carefree, if they have proper
working capital arrangements because they need not worry for the payment of business expenditure
or creditors. Adequate working capital creates a sense of security, confidence and loyalty, not only
throughout the business itself, but also among its customers, creditors and business associates.

3. Must for Maintaining Solvency and Continuing Production:


In order to maintain the solvency of the business, it is but essential that the sufficient amount t of
fund is available to make all the payments in time as and when they are due. Without ample working
capital, production will suffer, particularly in the era of cut throat competition, and a business can
never flourish in the absence of adequate working capital.
4. Sound Goodwill and Debt Capacity:
It is common experience of all prudent businessmen that promptness of payment in business creates
goodwill and increases the debt of the capacity of the business. A firm can raise funds from the
market, purchase goods on credit and borrow short-term funds from bank, etc. If the investor and
borrowers are confident that they will get their due interest and payment of principal in time.
5. Easy Loans from the Banks:
An adequate working capital i.e. excess of current assets over current liabilities helps the company to
borrow unsecured loans from the bank because the excess provides a good security to the unsecured
loans, Banks favour in granting seasonal loans, if business has a good credit standing and trade
reputation.
6.

Distribution of Dividend:
If company is short of working capital, it cannot distribute the good dividend to its shareholders in
spite of sufficient profits. Profits are to be retained in the business to make up the deficiency of
working capital. On the other contrary, if working capital is sufficient, ample dividend can be
declared and distributed. It increases the market value of shares.
20

7. Exploitation of Good Opportunity:


In case of adequacy of capital in a concern, good opportunities can be exploited e.g., company may
make off-season purchases resulting in substantial savings or it can fetch big supply orders resulting
in good profits.
8. Meeting Unseen Contingency:
Depression shoots the demand of working capital because sock piling of finished goods become
necessary. Certain other unseen contingencies e.g., financial crisis due to heavy losses, business
oscillations, etc. can easily be overcome, if company maintains adequate working capital.
9. High Morale:
The provision of adequate working capital improves the morale of the executive because they have
an environment of certainty, security and confidence, which is a great psychological, factor in
improving the overall efficiency of the business and of the person who is at the hell of fairs in the
company.
10. Increased Production Efficiency:
A continuous supply of raw material, research programme, innovations and technical development
and expansion programmes can successfully be carried out if adequate working capital is maintained
in the business. It will increase the production efficiency, which will, in turn increases the efficiency
and morale of the employees and lower costs and create image among the community.

21

DISADVANTAGES OF EXCESSIVE WORKING CAPITAL

E v e r y b u s i n e s s c o n c e r n s h o u l d h a v e a d e q u a t e w o r k i n g c a p i t a l t o r u n i t s business
operations. It should have neither redundant or excessive working capital nor inadequate nor shortage
of working capital. Both excessive as well as short working capital positions are bad for any
business.
1. Excessive working capital means idle funds which earn no profits for the business and hence the business
cannot earn a proper rate of return on its investments.
2. When there is redundant working capital, it may lead to unnecessary purchasing and accumulation of
inventories causing more chances of theft waste and losses.
3. Excessive working capital implies excessive debtors and defective credit Policy which may cause higher
incidence of bad debts.
4. It may result into overall inefficiency in the organization.
5. When there is an excessive working capital relation with the banks and other financial institutions may
not be maintained.
6. Due to low rate of return on investments the value of shares may also fall

DISADVANTAGES OF INADEQUATE WORKING CAPITAL


1) A concern, which has inadequate working capital, canno t pay its short-term liabilities
in time. Thus it will loose its reputation and shall not be able to get good credit facilities.
2) The firm cannot pay day-to-day expenses of its operations and it creates
inefficiencies, increases costs and reduces the profits of the business.
3) It becomes impossible to utilize efficiently the fixed assets due to non
- availability of liquid funds.
4 ) T h e r a t e o f r e t u r n o n i n v e s t m e n t s a l s o f a l l s w i t h t h e s h o r t a g e o f w o r k i n g capital.

22

NET WORKING CAPITAL

CURRENT ASSETS
STORES AND SPARE
PARTS
STOCK-IN-TRADE
SUNDRY DEBTORS
INTREST ACCRUED
AND INVESTMENTS
CASH AND BANK
LOANS AND
ADVANCES
TOTAL(A)

2006-2007 2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011


505.44
557.67
612.19
623.76
716.18

CURRENT
LIABILITIES
SUNDRY
CREDITORS
SUBSIDIARY
COMPANIES
INTEREST ACCRUED
BUT NOT DUE
ADVANCE
RECEIVED FROM
THE CUSTOMER
UNCLAIMED
MATURED
DEPOSITS(DUE)
INTEREST ACCRUED
ON UNPAID
DIVIDENDS AND
UNCLAIMED
MATURED
DIVIDENDS(DUE)
UNPAID DIVIDENDS
APPLICATION
MONEY PENDING
REFUND
UNPAID MATURED
DIVIDENDS
UNPAID MATURED
DEPOSITS
UNPAID MATURED
DEBENTURES
INTEREST ACCRUED

2006-2007 2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011

1827.54
631.63
0.20

2047.31
543.48
0.20

2868.28
635.98
0.00

2453.99
434.83
0.29

3237.58
428.03
0.00

455.41
3055.73

465.04
2452.78

1590.60
4330.43

3234.14
3628.28

4141.54
9553.19

6475.95

6066.28

10037.48

10375.29

18076.52

3145.99

3243.42

3842.78

4086.65

4721.07

102.61

115.74

1358.12

1514.30

1711.07

47.11

231.05

506.68

676.66

679.31

198.28

226.03

297.37

334.99

293.84

0.00

0.02

0.01

0.00

0.00

0.03

0.08

0.07

0.00

0.00

23.37
0.01

29.33
5.65

33.08
0.24

39.44
0.14

41.26
0.61

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.73

0.54

2.59

1.73

1.03

0.00

0.00

1.76

1.79

0.14

0.00

0.00

1.45

0.42

0.34

0.18

0.13

23

ON UNPAID
DIVIDENDS AND
MATURED
DIVIDENDS
PROVISION FOR
RETIRING
GRATUITIES
PROVISION FOR
EMPLOYEE
BENEFITS
PROVISION FOR
TAXATION
PROVISION FOR
FRINGE BENEFITS
PROPOSED
DIVIDEND
TOTAL(B)
NET WORKING
CAPITAL

49.31

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

470.19

848.54

1143.08

1127.50

1601.75

448.68

854.74

493.59

507.13

791.29

18.37

19.12

19.12

2.12

3.88

943.91

1278.40

1278.40

709.77

1151.06

5453.66

6768.78

8974.05

8999.61

10995.81

1022.29

(702.5)

1063.43

24

1375.68

7080.71

PERCENTAGE CHANGE IN NET WORKING CAPITAL


CURRENT ASSETS
STORES AND
SPARE PARTS
STOCK-IN-TRADE
SUNDRY DEBTORS
CASH AND BANK
LOANS AND
ADVANCES
TOTAL(A)

2006-2007 2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011


14.18
10.33
9.78
1.89
14.81

CURRENT
LIABILITIES
SUNDRY
CREDITORS
SUBSIDIARY
COMPANIES
INTEREST
ACCRUED BUT NOT
DUE
ADVANCE
RECEIVED FROM
THE CUSTOMER
PROVISION FOR
RETIRING
GRATUITIES
PROVISION FOR
EMPLOYEE
BENEFITS
PROVISION FOR
TAXATION
PROVISION FOR
FRINGE BENEFITS
PROPOSED
DIVIDEND
TOTAL(B)

2006-2007 2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011

PERCENTAGE
CHANGE OF NET

5.51
17.10
57.91
147.46

12.03
-13.96
2.11
-19.73

40.10
17.02
242.04
76.55

-14.44
-31.63
103.33
-16.21

31.93
-1.56
28.06
163.30

242.16

-9.22

385.49

42.98

236.54

24.15

3.10

18.48

6.35

15.52

64.52

12.80

1073.42

11.50

12.99

93.95

390.45

119.29

33.55

0.39

7.14

14.00

31.56

12.65

-12.28

5987.65

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

63.34

34.71

0.014

42.06

79.44

90.50

-42.25

2.74

56.03

675.11

4.08

0.00

-88.91

83.01

31.19

26.19

7.33

-44.48

62.17

6959.78

638.04

1232.01

-50.61

264.96

-6717.62

-647.26

-846.52

93.59

-28.42

25

WORKING
CAPITAL
(A-B)

FINANCIAL RATIOS

1. WORKING CAPITAL TURNOVER RATIO


It is a ratio that reflects the amount of working capital needed to maintain a given level of
sales. A high ratio indicates the firm is in a good liquidity position and vice-versa.
FORMULA =

PARTICULARS
NET SALES
NET WORKING
CAPITAL
WORKING
CAPITAL
TUNRNOVER
RATIO

NET SALES
NET WORKING CAPITAL

2006-2007
17551.09
1022.29

2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011


19693.28
24315.77
25021.98
29396.35
(702.5)
1063.43
1375.68
7080.71

17.17

-28.03

22.87

18.19

4.15

working capital turnover ratio


40
22.87

20 17.17
0
2006-1007
-20
-40

18.19
4.15

2007-2008
-28.03

2008-2009

INTERPRETATION:

26

2009-2010

2010-2011

The net working capital of TATA STEEL Ltd. has been fluctuating over the years. A sharp decrease in the
working capital in the year 2007-2008, where the working capital was negative was mainly because of a
decrease in current assets.
As compared to the year 2009-2010 where the working capital ratio was 18.19, the ratio this year has fallen
down to 4.15. The reason for decrease can be accredited to the increase in the current assets such as
inventory, cash & bank balances and loans and advances that has increased tremendously this year. There
has been an increase in the sales and the production capacity this year. The raw materials consumption has
also increased by 13.64%.

2. CURRENT RATIO
The current ratio is used to evaluate a companys overall short term liquidity position. It
tells us whether a company is in a position to meet its obligations.
FORMULA = CURRENT ASSETS
CURRENT LIABILITIES

PARTICULARS
CURRENT
ASSESTS
CURRENT
LIABILITIES
CURRENT RATIO

2006-2007
6475.95

2007-2008
6066.28

2008-2009
10037.48

2009-2010
10375.29

2010-1011
18076.52

5453.66

6768.78

8974.05

8999.61

10995.81

1.19

0.90

1.12

1.15

1.64

current ratio
1.8
1.64
1.6
1.4
1.2 1.19
1.15
1.12
1
0.9
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0
2006-2007 2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011

27

current ratio

INTERPRETATION:
The ideal current ratio is considered to be 2:1. The current ratio has been increasing steadily over the years.
As compared to the previous year in 2009-2010 the ratio has increased to 1.64 in the year 2010-2011. The
reason for increase might be continuous investments in the current assets over the years.

3. QUICK RATIO
Quick ratio / Liquid ratio is an indicator of a companys short term solvency or liquidity
position. It is the relationship between liquid assets and liabilities. An asset is said to be liquid if it can be
converted into cash within a short period without loss of value.
FORMULA = CURRENT ASSETS INVENTORY
CURRENT LIABILITIES
PARTICULARS
CURRENT
ASSETS
INVENTORY
CURRENT
ASSETSINVENTORY
CURRENT
LIABILTY
QUICK RATIO

2006-2007
6475.95

2007-2008
6066.28

2008-2009
10037.48

2009-2010
10375.29

2010-2011
18076.52

1827.54
4648.41

2047.31
4018.97

2868.28
7169.2

2453.99
7921.3

3237.58
14838.94

5453.66

6768.78

8957.05

8999.61

10995.81

0.85

0.59

0.80

0.88

1.34

QUICK RATIO
1.34
0.88

20
11

QUICK RATIO

20
10
-

20
10

0.8

20
09
-

20
09

0.59

20
08
-

20
08
20
07
-

20
06
-

20
07

1.6
1.4
1.2
1
0.8 0.85
0.6
0.4
0.2
0

INTERPRETATION:

28

The ideal standard in case of quick ratio is 1:1. And if it is more it is considered to be better. The idea behind
this is that for every rupee of current liabilities, there should be at least one rupee of liquid asset.
Quick ratio is thus a rigorous test of liquidity and gives a better picture of short term financial position of
the firm. As shown in the graph above, we can see that after a steep fall in the quick ratio from the year
2006-2007 to 2007-2008 there has been a steady increase in the quick ratio and for the year 2010-2011 the
ratio is 1.34 which signifies that the liquidity position of the firm has improved and this is because of
increase in the cash that is lying with the firm.

4. DEBTORS TURNOVER RATIO


Debtors Turnover Ratio or Receivables Turnover Ratio indicates the relationship between
net sales and average debtors. It shows the rate at which cash is generated by the turnover of debtors.

FORMULA = AVERAGE DEBTORS


NET SALES
AVERAGE DEBTORS= (OPENING DEBTORS + CLOSING DEBTORS) / 2

PARTICULARS
AVERAGE
DEBTORS
NET SALES
DEBTORS
TURNOVER
RATIO

2006-2007
585.515

2007-2008
587.55

2008-2009
589.73

2009-2010
535.40

2010-2011
431.43

17551.09
29.98

19693.28
33.52

24315.77
41.23

25021.98
46.73

29396.35
68.13

DEBTORS TURNOVER RATIO


68.13

20
11

20
10
-

20
10

20
09
-

20
09

20
08
-

46.73

41.23

33.52

20
08

20
07
-

20
06
-

20
07

80
70
60
50
40
30 29.98
20
10
0

29

DEBTORS TURNOVER
RATIO

INTERPRETATION:
Debtors turnover ratio indicates the speed with which the amount is being collected from the debtors.
The higher the ratio the better it is, since it indicates the amount from the debtors is being collected more
quickly. The more quickly the debtors pay, the less risk from bad debts, and so lower is the expenses of
collection and increase in the liquidity of the firm. By comparing the debtors turnover ratio of the current
year with the previous year, it may be assessed whether the sales policy of the management is efficient or
not.
As shown in the graph above, there has been an increase in the ratio from 2006-2007 to
2010-2011from 29.98 to 68.13 which shows that the sales management of the firm is quite efficient.

30

5. DEBT COLLECTION PERIOD


Days Sales Outstanding is a short term (operating) Activity ratio which tells us about the
debtors holding time. The more the holding period the more risky it becomes for the company. A high debt
collection period indicates that the company is taking time to collect cash from its debtors. The cash is not
being collected on time which is not a good sign for the company, it is a red flag.

FORMULA = 365/ DEBTORS TURNOVER RATIO

PARTICULAR
S
DEBTORS
TURNOVER
RATIO
NO. OF DAYS
DEBT
COLLECTION
PERIOD

2006-2007

2007-2008

2008-2009

2009-2010

2010-2011

29.98

33.52

41.23

46.73

68.13

365
12

365
11

365
9

365
8

365
5

31

DEBT COLLECTION PERIOD

DEBT COLLECTION
PERIOD

20
11

20
10
-

20
10

20
09
-

20
08
-

20
08

11

20
07
-

20
06
-

20
07

12

20
09

12
10
8
6
4
2
0

INTERPRETATION:
Debt collection period means the average number of days that the debtors take to get converted to cash. In
other words, credit sales are locked up in debtors for the number of days.
As we can see here, the debt collection period has come down from 12 days to 5 days which means that
the debtors get converted to cash in 5 days. An increase in the ratio indicates excessive blockage of funds
with the debtors which increases the chances of bad debts. In this case as we can see that there is a decrease
in the average collection period which indicates prompt payment by debtors which reduces the chances of
bad debts.
Therefore, from the above data it can be concluded that the company is in a better position and is
improving as compared to its previous years.

32

6. STOCK TURNOVER RATIO


The Inventory Turnover Ratio measures the efficiency of the firms inventory
management. A higher ratio indicates that inventory does not remain in warehouses or on the shelves but
rather turns over rapidly from the time of acquisition to sales. A lower inventory turnover ratio means
accumulation of inventories, over investment in inventory or unsalable goods.

FORMULA = COST OF GOODS SOLD


AVERAGE STOCK
AVERAGE STOCK= (OPENING STOCK+CLOSING STOCK)/2
PARTICULARS
COST OF
GOODS SOLD
AVERAGE
STOCK
STOCK
TURNOVER
RATIO

2006-2007
10174.97

2007-2008
11155.5

2008-2009
14928.65

2009-2010
15730.67

2010-2011
17471.83

1779.82

1937.43

2457.8

2661.14

2845.78

5.72

5.76

6.07

5.91

6.13

33

STOCK TURNOVER RATIO


6.2
6.1

6.13

6.07

5.91

5.9
5.8
5.7 5.72

STOCK TURNOVER RATIO

5.76

5.6
20
11
20
10
-

20
10
20
09
-

20
09
20
08
-

20
08
20
07
-

20
06
-

20
07

5.5

INTERPRETATION:
This ratio indicates the relationship between the cost of goods sold during the year and average stock kept
during that year. The ratio indicates whether the stock has been efficiently used or not. It shows the speed
with which the stock is turned into sales during the year.
The graph above shows that after an increase in the ratio from the year 2007-2008 to 2008-2009 (5.76-6.07)
there in the year 2009-2010(5.91) after which again a rise in the ratio in the year 2010-2011(6.13). A high
ratio is indicative that the stock is selling quickly.

34

7. PAYABLES TURNOVER RATIO


Although accounts payable are liabilities rather than assets, their trend is significant as they represent an
important source of financing for operating activities. The creditors turnover ratio is an important tool of
analysis as a firm can reduce its requirement of current assets by relying on suppliers credit. This shows the
relationship between credit purchases and average accounts payable. Higher ratio shows that accounts are to
be settled rapidly whereas, low ratio reflects liberal credit terms granted by suppliers.
FORMULA- NET CREDIT PURCHASE
AVERAGE CREDITORS
AVERAGE CREDITORS= (OPENING CREDITORS+CLOSING CREDITORS)/2
PARTICULARS
NET CREDIT
PURCHASE
AVERAGE
CREDITORS
PAYABLES
TURNOVER
RATIO

2006-2007
2263.01

2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011


2353.80
6241.61
5215.42
6853.95

2840.01

3194.70

3543.10

3964.72

4383.86

0.79

0.73

1.76

1.31

1.56

35

PAYABLES TURNOVER RATIO

20
11

PAYABLES
TURNOVER RATIO

20
10
-

20
10

1.56

20
09
-

20
09

20
08
-

20
08

1.31

1.76

0.73

20
07
-

20
06
-

20
07

2
1.5
10.79
0.5
0

INTERPRETATION:
The ratio indicates the speed with which the amount is being paid to the creditors. A higher ratio is better
since it would indicate that the creditors are being paid more quickly and this increases the credit worthiness
of the firm.
Here, the graph above shows a steep fall in the ratio from the year 2008-2009(1.76) to 2009-2010(1.31) and
then again a rise to the year 2010-2011(1.56). The reason for the fall can be attributed to a decrease in the
net credit purchases in the year 2009-2010.

COMPARITIVE
ANALYSIS OF
TATA STEEL,
SAIL
36

&
JSW

SAIL

Steel Authority of India Limited (SAIL) is the leading steel-making company in India. It is a fully
integrated iron and steel maker, producing both basic and special steels for domestic construction,
engineering, power, railway, automotive and defence industries and for sale in export markets. SAIL is
also among the five Maharatnas of the country's Central Public Sector Enterprises.

37

SAIL manufactures and sells a broad range of steel products, including hot and cold rolled sheets and
coils, galvanised sheets, electrical sheets, structural, railway products, plates, bars and rods, stainless steel
and other alloy steels. SAIL produces iron and steel at five integrated plants and three special steel plants,
located principally in the eastern and central regions of India and situated close to domestic sources of
raw materials, including the Company's iron ore, limestone and dolomite mines. The company has the
distinction of being Indias second largest producer of iron ore and of having the countrys second largest
mines network. This gives SAIL a competitive edge in terms
of captive availability of iron ore, limestone, and dolomite
which are inputs for steel making.
SAIL's wide range of long and flat steel products are much in
demand in the domestic as well as the international market.
This vital responsibility is carried out by SAIL's own Central
Marketing Organisation (CMO) that transacts business
through its network of 37 Branch Sales Offices spread across
the four regions, 25 Departmental Warehouses, 42
Consignment Agents and 27 Customer Contact Offices.
CMOs domestic marketing effort is supplemented by its ever
widening network of rural dealers who meet the demands of
the smallest customers in the remotest corners of the country. With the total number of dealers over 2000 ,
SAIL's wide marketing spread ensures availability of quality steel in virtually all the districts of the
country.
SAIL's International Trade Division ( ITD), in New Delhi- an ISO 9001:2000 accredited unit of CMO,
undertakes exports of Mild Steel products and Pig Iron from SAILs five integrated steel plants.
With technical and managerial expertise and know-how in steel making gained over four decades, SAIL's
Consultancy Division (SAILCON) at New Delhi offers services and consultancy to clients world-wide.
SAIL has a well-equipped Research and Development Centre for Iron and Steel (RDCIS) at Ranchi which
helps to produce quality steel and develop new technologies for the steel industry. Besides, SAIL has its
own in-house Centre for Engineering and Technology (CET), Management Training Institute (MTI) and
Safety Organisation at Ranchi. Our captive mines are under the control of the Raw Materials Division in
Kolkata. The Environment Management Division and Growth Division of SAIL operate from their
headquarters in Kolkata. Almost all our plants and major units are ISO Certified.

BACKGROUND & HISTORY

The Precursor

38

SAIL traces its origin to the formative years of an emerging nation - India. After independence the builders
of modern India worked with a vision - to lay the infrastructure for rapid industrialisaton of the country. The
steel sector was to propel the economic growth. Hindustan Steel Private Limited was set up on January 19,
1954.
Expanding Horizon (1959-1973)
Hindustan Steel (HSL) was initially designed to manage only one plant that was coming up at Rourkela. For
Bhilai and Durgapur Steel Plants, the preliminary work was done by the Iron and Steel Ministry. From April
1957, the supervision and control of these two steel plants were also transferred to Hindustan Steel. The
registered office was originally in New Delhi. It moved to Calcutta in July 1956, and ultimately to Ranchi in
December 1959.
The 1 MT phases of Bhilai and Rourkela Steel Plants were completed by the end of December 1961. The 1
MT phase of Durgapur Steel Plant was completed in January 1962 after commissioning of the Wheel and
Axle plant. The crude steel production of HSL went up from .158 MT (1959-60) to 1.6 MT. A new steel
company, Bokaro Steel Limited, was incorporated in January 1964 to construct and operate the steel plant at
Bokaro.The second phase of Bhilai Steel Plant was completed in September 1967 after commissioning of
the Wire Rod Mill. The last unit of the 1.8 MT phase of Rourkela - the Tandem Mill - was commissioned in
February 1968, and the 1.6 MT stage of Durgapur Steel Plant was completed in August 1969 after
commissioning of the Furnace in SMS. Thus, with the completion of the 2.5 MT stage at Bhilai, 1.8 MT at
Rourkela and 1.6 MT at Durgapur, the total crude steel production capacity of HSL was raised to 3.7 MT in
1968-69 and subsequently to 4MT in 1972-73.
Holding Company
The Ministry of Steel and Mines drafted a policy statement to evolve a new model for managing industry.
The policy statement was presented to the Parliament on December 2, 1972. On this basis the concept of
creating a holding company to manage inputs and outputs under one umbrella was mooted. This led to the
formation of Steel Authority of India Ltd. The company, incorporated on January 24, 1973 with an
authorized capital of Rs. 2000 crore, was made responsible for managing five integrated steel plants at
Bhilai, Bokaro, Durgapur, Rourkela and Burnpur, the Alloy Steel Plant and the Salem Steel Plant. In 1978
SAIL was restructured as an operating company.
Since its inception, SAIL has been instrumental in laying a sound infrastructure for the industrial
development of the country. Besides, it has immensely contributed to the development of technical and
managerial expertise. It has triggered the secondary and tertiary waves of economic growth by continuously
providing the inputs for the consuming industry.

39

JSW
JSW Group is one of the fastest growing business conglomerates with a strong presence in the core
economic sector. This Sajjan Jindal led enterprise has grown from a steel rolling mill in 1982 to a multi
business conglomerate worth US $ 9 billion within a short span of time.
As part of the US $ 15 billion O. P. Jindal Group, JSW Group has diversified interests in Steel, Energy,
Minerals and Mining, Aluminium, Infrastructure and Logistics, Cement and Information Technology.
On its road to growth and expansion, the Group is also conscious about its responsibility towards
environment and social development. Eco-efficiency is a matter of principle. Preventive measures for
damage to the environment are taken into account at the planning stage of production and growth.
JSW Foundation, an integral part of the Group, is the CSR wing, with a vision to create
socio economic difference in the fields of Education, Health and Sports, Community
Relationship/Propagation as well as Art, Culture and Heritage.
JSW Foundation plans and implements social development activities of the JSW group of companies. It is an
independent institution and is governed by a Board of Trustees who is drawn from the senior management of
the JSW group of companies. The Foundation is headed by Mrs Sangita Jindal while the executive is headed
by Shri Jugal Tandon in his capacity as CEO, Corporate Sustainability. A team of social development
professionals is based in Mumbai and at every location where JSW has its operations and undertake
community based activity in consultation with their respective managements. An Advisory Board
comprising of eminent NGO leaders has been constituted recently to render advice on social processes and
participatory planning and execution of projects.
A social development policy has been accepted by the group. JSW cherishes people and believes in inclusive
growth to facilitate creation of a value based and empowered society through continuous and purposeful
engagement of all stakeholders. In partnership with external development agencies, JSW would strive
toachieve sustainable development in all spheres of life including integrated community development,
promotion of arts and culture, environment protection and sports .
As a responsible corporate, JSW would integrate its environment, HR and ethical business policies with
appropriate community engagement and gender equity. JSW is committed to allocation of 1.5% of its PAT to
pursue its CSR policy. In tune with this, JSW Foundation works closely with village communities and
creates synergies with other verticals of the JSW group to assimilate their intervention in a social
development framework.

40

1. WORKING CAPITAL RATIO


It is a ratio that reflects the amount of working capital needed to maintain a given level of sales. A
high ratio indicates the firm is in a good liquidity position and vice-versa.

FORMULA =

PARTICULARS
TATA STEEL
SAIL
JINDAL

2006-2007
17.17
3.63
42.79

NET SALES
NET WORKING CAPITAL
2007-2008
-28.03
3.01
-10.49

2008-2009
22.87
2.48
-4.78

2009-2010
18.19
1.85
-8.82

2010-2011
4.15
2.06
187.34

200
150
100

TATA STEEL
SAIL

50

JINDAL

20
11
20
10
-

20
10
20
09
-

20
08

20
09
20
08
-

20
06
-

-50

20
07
-

20
07

INTERPRETATION:
The working capital ratio of TATA STEEL has been fluctuating over the years. The reason for negative
working capital for the year 2007-2008 can be attributed to the decrease in current assets whereas a sharp
decrease in working capital for the year 2010-2011 is because of the increase in current assets such as cash
and bank balances, loans and advances and also because of an increase in the raw material consumption.
The working capital ratio of SAIL Ltd. has been falling constantly from the year 2006-2007
to the year 2009-2010 after which there was an increase in the ratio.
The working capital of JSW has shown a sharp decrease from the year 2006-2007 to 20072008 where the working capital ratio remained constantly negative for three consecutive years and after that
there was an increase in the ratio. The reason for the increase in the ratio is an increase in the current assets,
loans and advances.

41

2. CURRENT RATIO
The current ratio is used to evaluate a companys overall short term liquidity position. It
tells us whether a company is in a position to meet its obligations.

FORMULA = CURRENT ASSETS


CURRENT LIABILITIES
PARTICULARS
TATA STEEL
SAIL
JINDAL

2006-2007
1.19
1.86
1.08

2007-2008
0.90
1.99
0.74

2008-2009
1.12
2.02
0.61

2009-2010
1.15
1.78
0.73

2010-2011
1.64
1.84
1.01

2.5
2
1.5
1

2.02

1.99
1.19
1.08

0.5

1.15

1.12

0.9
0.74

1.84
1.64

1.78

1.64

1.01

SAIL

0.73

0.61

TATA STEEL
JINDAL

20
11
20
10
-

20
10
20
09
-

20
09
20
08
-

20
08
20
07
-

20
06
-

20
07

INTERPRETATION:
The current ratio of TATA STEEL has been rising from the year 2007-2008and it has shown a positive
graph. The reason for the constantly rising graph since 2007-2008 has been investment in the current assets,
i.e. inventories, debtors, loans and advances and the liquid cash and bank balances.
SAIL has a fluctuating current ratio over the years with various rises and falls over the
time. The reason for the fall in the ratio from the year 2008-2009 to the year 2009-2010 was the decrease in
the current assets.
JSW had witnessed a steep downfall till the year 2008-2009 after which there was a
rise in the ratio till 2010-2011. The reason for decrease in the ratio from the year 2007-2008 to the year
2008-2009 was because of the increase in current liabilities and again a rise in the year 2009-2010 was
because of the increase in the current assets.
Current ratio should therefore be maintained around its ideal standard and for
achieving this the companys should therefore maintain its current assets and current liabilities in the right
proportion.
42

3. QUICK RATIO
Quick ratio OR Liquid ratio is an indicator of a companys short term solvency or
liquidity position. It is the relationship between liquid assets and liabilities. An asset is said to be liquid if it
can be converted into cash within a short period without loss of value.
FORMULA = CURRENT ASSETS INVENTORY
CURRENT LIABILITIES

PARTICULARS
TATA STEEL
SAIL
JINDAL

2006-2007
0.85
1.25
0.64

2007-2008
0.59
1.47
0.36

2008-2009
0.80
1.42
0.34

2009-2010
0.88
1.37
0.39

2010-2011
1.34
1.29
0.60

3
2.5

2.4

2
1.5
1
0.5

1.47
0.85
0.64

0.59
0.36

TATA STEEL
1.42

1.37

0.8

0.88

0.34

0.39

1.29 SAIL
1.34
JINDAL
0.6

0
2006-2007 2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010

INTERPRETATION:
The quick ratio of TATA STEEL has been rising since 2007-2008 and the investments should be made
enough in the current assets so as to maintain the ratio of current assets and current liabilities as 1:1.
The quick ratio of SAIL had declined from 2006-2007(2.4) to 2007-2008(1.47) and
thereafter the ratio has been declining throughout but the company has maintained the ratio above the ideal
standard.
The ratio of JSW had fallen from the year 2007-2008(0.36) to 2008-2009(0.34) negligibly
and thereafter it rose to 0.39 in 2008-2009 and finally to 0.60 in 2010-2011. The reason for the increase in
the ratio in 2010-2011 was increase in the cash and bank balances maintained with the company.

43

4. DEBTORS TURNOVER RATIO


Debtors Turnover Ratio or Receivables Turnover Ratio indicates the relationship between
net sales and average debtors. It shows the rate at which cash is generated by the turnover of debtors

FORMULA = AVERAGE DEBTORS


NET SALES
AVERAGE DEBTORS= (OPENING DEBTORS + CLOSING DEBTORS) / 2

PARTICULARS
TATA STEEL
SAIL
JINDAL

2006-2007
29.98
16.31
-

2007-2008
33.52
14.73
33.83

2009-2010
46.73
12.44
37.87

2010-2011
68.13
11.16
33.05

68.13

TATA STEEL
SAIL
JSW

20
11

11.16

20
10
-

20
10
20
09
-

20
09
20
08
-

20
08
20
07
-

20
06
-

20
07

80
70
60
50
46.73
41.23
40
33.52
30 29.98 38.07
33.8
33.05
20 16.31
14.73
14.21
12.44
10
0
7.87

2008-2009
41.23
14.21
38.07

INTERPRETATION:
The debtors turnover ratio has shown a positive rising graph throughout which is very good for the company
since it shows the speed with which the money is being recovered from the debtors. And rising graph
throughout shows that the sales management is quite efficient in recovering the money from the debtors.
SAIL has a declining graph throughout which is not a good sign and therefore it
means that credit sales have been made to the debtors who do not deserve so much of credit and therefore
the company must revise its sales policy.

44

JSW has a fluctuating graph and after a steep fall in the year 2009-2010 the ratio
rose to 33.5 in the year 2010-2011. The debtors and the sales figures have risen for the year 2010-2011 and
the reason for the rise in the ratio can be efficient sales management and a sound sales policy.

5. DEBT COLLECTION PERIOD


Days Sales Outstanding is a short term (operating) Activity ratio which tells us about
the debtors holding time. The more the holding period the more risky it becomes for the company. A high
debt collection period indicates that the company is taking time to collect cash from its debtors. The cash is
not being collected on time which is not a good sign for the company, it is a red flag.
FORMULA = 365/ DEBTORS TURNOVER RATIO

PARTICULARS
TATA STEEL
SAIL
JINDAL

2006-2007
12
22

2007-2008
11
24
10

2008-2009
9
26
9

2009-2010
8
29
9

2010-2011
5
33
11

35
30
25
20
15

TATA STEEL

10

SAIL

JSW
20
10

20
09
-

20
09

20
08
-

20
08

20
07
-

20
07

20
06
-

20
05
-

20
06

INTERPRETATION:
The lower the debt collection period the lesser the chances of bad debts and thus is better for the firm. TATA
STEEL has a sound sale policy and the average collection period has been decreasing over the years and
finally the debtors are converted to cash in 5 days as in the year 2010-2011 and lesser is the collection period
shorter is the operating cycle.
SAILs average collection period has been increasing in the number of days which means
that they have a liberal sales policy and the credit period is thus extended for the debtors. A higher debt
45

collection period generally increases the chances of bad debts and reduces the chances of recovery of money
from the debtors.
JSW has maintained its collection period at more or less a constant platform. The debtors
are converted to cash in 11 days (2010-2011). Here we can conclude that TATA STEEL is in a better position
as compared to the other two firms. SAIL should make some serious efforts to reduce its debt collection
period

6. STOCK TURNOVER RATIO


The Inventory Turnover Ratio measures the efficiency of the firms inventory
management. A higher ratio indicates that inventory does not remain in warehouses or on the shelves but
rather turns over rapidly from the time of acquisition to sales. A lower inventory turnover ratio means
accumulation of inventories, over investment in inventory or unsalable goods.

FORMULA = COST OF GOODS SOLD


AVERAGE STOCK
AVERAGE STOCK= (OPENING STOCK+CLOSING STOCK)/2
PARTICULARS
TATA STEEL
SAIL
JINDAL

2006-2007
5.72
4.22

7
5.72
6
55.87
4 4.22

2007-2008
5.76
4.68
5.87

6.07

5.89
5.76
4.68

3
2
1
0

5.29
3.62

4.09
TATA STEEL
SAIL

20
11
20
10
-

20
10
20
09
-

20
09
20
08
-

20
07
-

20
08

JSW

20
07
20
06
-

2009-2010
5.91
3.62
5.74

6.13

5.91

5.74
4.68

2008-2009
6.07
4.68
5.89

INTERPRETATION:

46

2010-2011
6.13
4.09
5.29

The stock turnover ratio of TATA STEEL has been rising throughout and the cost of goods sold has also
been rising with a rise in the average stock maintained with the company. A higher stock ratio turnover is
indicative that the stock is selling quickly, that is reflected with the higher sales.
SAIL has fluctuating ratio throughout.
JSW has a declining ratio, though the cost of goods sold and the average debtors has
been rising but certain items which have to be excluded from the cost of goods sold have been rising over
the time.

7. PAYABLES TURNOVER RATIO


Although accounts payable are liabilities rather than assets, their trend is
significant as they represent an important source of financing for operating activities. The creditors turnover
ratio is an important tool of analysis as a firm can reduce its requirement of current assets by relying on
suppliers credit. This shows the relationship between credit purchases and average accounts payable.
Higher ratio shows that accounts are to be settled rapidly whereas, low ratio reflects liberal credit terms
granted by suppliers.

FORMULA- NET CREDIT PURCHASE


AVERAGE CREDITORS
AVERAGE CREDITORS= (OPENING CREDITORS+CLOSING CREDITORS)/2

PARTICULARS
TATA STEEL
SAIL
JINDAL

2006-2007
0.79
5.46

2007-2008
0.73
5.21
7.17

47

2008-2009
1.76
6.14
6.28

2009-2010
1.31
3.13
6.51

2010-2011
1.56
3.82
8.57

8.57

9
87.17
7
6
5

6.28

6.51
6.14

5.46

5.21

TATA STEEL

3.82
3.13

3
2
1

1.76
0.79

1.31

SAIL
JSW

1.56

0.73
0
2006-2007 2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011

INTERPRETATION:

The payables turnover ratio means the speed with which the creditors are being paid. TATA STEEL has a
rising graph which indicates that the creditors of the firm are being paid on time and quite frequently and
this helps in increasing the credit worthiness of the firm.
SAIL has had a fall in the ratio drastically from the year 2008-2009 to the year
2009-2010.
JSW is quite efficient in paying off its creditors. A ratio of 8.57 times mans that the speed
with which the company pays to its creditors is quite high.

48

RATIO ANALYSIS

WHAT IS RATIO ANALYSIS???


A tool used by individuals to conduct a quantitative analysis of information in a company's financial
statements. Ratios are calculated from current year numbers and are then compared to previous years, other
companies, the industry, or even the economy to judge the performance of the company. Ratio analysis is
predominately used by proponents of fundamental analysis.
Single most important technique of financial analysis in which quantities are converted into ratios for
meaningful comparisons, with past ratios and ratios of other firms in the same or different industries. Ratio
analysis determines trends and exposes strengths or weaknesses of a firm.

Ratios can be found out by dividing one number by another number. Ratios show how one number is related
to another. It may be expressed in the form of co-efficient, percentage, proportion, or rate. For example the
current assets and current liabilities of a business on a particular date are $200,000 and $100,000
respectively. The ratio of current assets and current liabilities could be expressed as 2 (i.e. 200,000 /
100,000) or 200 percent or it can be expressed as 2:1 i.e., the current assets are two times the current
liabilities. Ratio sometimes is expressed in the form of rate. For instance, the ratio between two numerical
facts, usually over a period of time, e.g. stock turnover is three times a year.
49

Classification of Accounting Ratios:


Ratios may be classified in a number of ways to suit any particular purpose. Different kinds of ratios are
selected for different types of situations. Mostly, the purpose for which the ratios are used and the kind of
data available determine the nature of analysis. The various accounting ratios can be classified as follows:

Classification of Accounting Ratios / Financial Ratios


(A)
Traditional Classification or
Statement Ratios

(B)
Functional Classification or
Classification According to Tests

(C)
Significance Ratios or Ratios
According to Importance

Profit and loss account


ratios or revenue/income
statement ratios

Profitability ratios

Primary ratios

Liquidity ratios

Secondary ratios

Balance sheet ratios or


position statement ratios

Activity ratios

Composite/mixed ratios
or inter statement ratios

Leverage ratios or long


term solvency ratios

Advantages of Ratios Analysis:


Ratio analysis is an important and age-old technique of financial analysis. The following are some of the
advantages / Benefits of ratio analysis:
1. Simplifies financial statements: It simplifies the comprehension of financial statements. Ratios tell
the whole story of changes in the financial condition of the business
2. Facilitates inter-firm comparison: It provides data for inter-firm comparison. Ratios highlight the
factors associated with successful and unsuccessful firm. They also reveal strong firms and weak
firms, overvalued and undervalued firms.
3. Helps in planning: It helps in planning and forecasting. Ratios can assist management, in its basic
functions of forecasting. Planning, co-ordination, control and communications.
4. Makes inter-firm comparison possible: Ratios analysis also makes possible comparison of the
performance of different divisions of the firm. The ratios are helpful in deciding about their
efficiency or otherwise in the past and likely performance in the future.
5. Help in investment decisions: It helps in investment decisions in the case of investors and lending
decisions in the case of bankers etc.
50

Limitations of Ratios Analysis:


The ratios analysis is one of the most powerful tools of financial management. Though ratios are simple
to calculate and easy to understand, they suffer from serious limitations.
1.

Ratios are based only on the information which has been recorded in the financial
statements. Financial statements themselves are subject to several limitations. Thus ratios derived,
there from, are also subject to those limitations. For example, non-financial changes though
important for the business are not relevant by the financial statements. Financial statements are
affected to a very great extent by accounting conventions and concepts. Personal judgment plays a
great part in determining the figures for financial statements.
2. Comparative study required: Ratios are useful in judging the efficiency of the business only when
they are compared with past results of the business. However, such a comparison only provide
glimpse of the past performance and forecasts for future may not prove correct since several other
factors like market conditions, management policies, etc. may affect the future operations.
3. Ratios alone are not adequate: Ratios are only indicators, they cannot be taken as final regarding
good or bad financial position of the business. Other things have also to be seen.
4. Problems of price level changes: A change in price level can affect the validity of ratios calculated
for different time periods. In such a case the ratio analysis may not clearly indicate the trend in
solvency and profitability of the company. The financial statements, therefore, be adjusted keeping in
view the price level changes if a meaningful comparison is to be made through accounting ratios.
5. Lack of adequate standard: No fixed standard can be laid down for ideal ratios. There are no well
accepted standards or rule of thumb for all ratios which can be accepted as norm. It renders
interpretation of the ratios difficult.
6. Limited use of single ratios: A single ratio, usually, does not convey much of a sense. To make a
better interpretation, a number of ratios have to be calculated which is likely to confuse the analyst
than help him in making any good decision.
7. Personal bias: Ratios are only means of financial analysis and not an end in itself. Ratios have to
interpreted and different people may interpret the same ratio in different way.
8. Incomparable: Not only industries differ in their nature, but also the firms of the similar business
widely differ in their size and accounting procedures etc. It makes comparison of ratios difficult and
misleading.

FINANCIAL RATIOS
1. NET DEBT TO EQUITY
Debt is the borrowed funds and Equity is the owned funds of an organization. This ratio is calculated to
measure the extent to which debt financing has been used in a business. A ratio of 1:1 is considered to be
satisfactory. This ratio is also known as External-Internal ratio as it indicates the relationship between the
external equities or the outsiders funds and the internal equities or the shareholders funds.
FORMULA =

NET DEBT
SHAREHOLDERS FUND

51

NET DEBT= SECURED LOANS+ UNSECURED LOANS- CASH AND BANK BALANCECURRENT INVESTMENTS
EQUITY= SHAREHOLDERS FUND- MISCELLANOUS EXPENSES
FINANCIAL YEAR 2006-2007
COMPANY

NET DEBT
(1728.55)

SHAREHOLDERS
FUND
15108.68

DEBT- EQUITY
RATIO
(0.12)

TATA STEEL
SAIL
JSW

(5454.57)
3642.29

17184
5788.92

(0.32)
0.63

FINANCIAL YEAR 2007-2008


COMPANY

NET DEBT

TATA STEEL
SAIL
JSW

16519.85
(10737.77)
6283.78

SHAREHOLDERS
FUND
27455.84
23004.09
7677.25

DEBT- EQUITY
RATIO
0.61
(0.47)
0.82

SHAREHOLDERS
FUND
30281.33
0.79841
7959.25

DEBT-EQUITY
RATIO
0.73
(0.38)
1.21

SHAREHOLDERS
FUND
36961.80
33316.70
9706.34

DEBT- EQUITY
RATIO
0.55
(0.18)
0.98

SHAREHOLDERS
FUND
46944.63
37069.47
17225.27

DEBT-EQUITY
RATIO
0.45
0.07
0.35

FINANCIAL YEAR 2008-2009


COMPANY

NET DEBT

TATA STEEL
SAIL
JSW

22086.25
(10714.20)
9602.56

FINANCIAL YEAR 2009-2010


COMPANY

NET DEBT

TATA STEEL
SAIL
JSW

20285.83
(5925.12)
9529.64

FINANCIAL YEAR 2010-2011


COMPANY

NET DEBT

TATA STEEL
SAIL
JSW

21159.81
2638.56
5965.65

52

1.4

1.21

1.2

0.98

0.82

0.8

0.63

0.6
0.4

0.61

TATA STEEL

0.73
0.55
SAIL

0.2

0.45
0.35
JSW
0.07

0
-0.2
-0.4

2006-2007

-0.12

2007-2008

2009-2010

2010-2011

-0.18

-0.32

-0.6

2008-2009

-0.47

-0.38

INTERPRETATION:

The debt-equity ratio is calculated to assess the firms ability to meet its long term liabilities. Generally, a
ratio of 2:1 is considered to be safe for the long term lenders and a ratio below 2:1 provides sufficient
protection to the long term lenders and thus they are more secure and a higher ratio thus would indicate a
more risky financial position of the firm.
The debt- equity ratio for all the year and of all the three companies has been less than 2:1 and
this is indicative of a sound financial position of the firm.

2. SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY RATIO


This ratio helps to determine how much shareholders would receive in the event of a company-wide
liquidation. It represents the amount of assets on which shareholders have a residual claim. The higher the
ratio the more shareholders may receive and vice-versa.
53

FORMULA= SHAREHOLDRES EQUITY


TOTAL ASSETS

FINANCIAL YEAR 2006-2007


COMPANY

SHAREHOLDERS
EQUITY

TATA STEEL
SAIL
JSW

580.67
4130.40
525.80

TOTAL
ASSETS(TANGIBLE
)
25597.50
22906.33
10779.74

SHAREHOLDERS
EQUITY RATIO

TOTAL
ASSETS(TANGIBLE
)
47075.52
27677.41
16475.62

SHAREHOLDERS
EQUITY RATIO

TOTAL
ASSETS(TANGIBLE
)
58741.77
36855.04
20653.04

SHAREHOLDERS
EQUITY RATIO

TOTAL
ASSETS(TANGIBLE
)
64232.78
51242.87
23256.39

SHAREHOLDERS
EQUITY RATIO

TOTAL
ASSETS(TANGIBLE
)
78555.91

SHAREHOLDERS
EQUITY RATIO

0.023
0.18
0.049

FINANCIAL YEAR 2007-2008


COMPANY

SHAREHOLDERS
EQUITY

TATA STEEL
SAIL
JSW

6203.30
4130.40
537.01

0.132
0.15
0.032

FINANCIAL YEAR 2008-2009


COMPANY

SHAREHOLDERS
EQUITY

TATA STEEL
SAIL
JSW

6203.45
4130.40
537.01

0.11
0.11
0.03

FINANCIAL YEAR 2009-2010


COMAPNY

SHAREHOLDERS
EQUITY

TATA STEEL
SAIL
JSW

887.41
4130.40
527.11

0.014
0.08
0.023

FINANCIAL YEAR 2010-2011


COMPANY

SHAREHOLDERS
EQUITY

TATA STEEL

959.41

54

0.012

SAIL
JSW

4130.40
563.18

58726.03
31493.65

0.07
0.018

0.2
0.18

0.18

0.16

0.15

0.14

0.13

0.12

0.11
0.11

TATA STEEL

0.1

SAIL

0.08

0.08

0.07

0.06

JSW

0.05

0.04

0.03
0.02

0.03

0.02
0.01

0.02

0.01

0.02

0
2006-2007

2007-2008

2008-2009

2009-2010

2010-2011

INTERPRETATION:

A ratio used to help determine how much shareholders would receive in the event of a company-wide
liquidation. The ratio is calculated by dividing total shareholders' equity by total assets of the firm, and it
represents the amount of assets on which shareholders have a residual claim.
If we consider as in the case of TATA STEEL, the ratio for the year 2006-2007 is 0.023
so this means that the shareholders would have a claim of 2.3% on the assets in the event of the wind up of
the company.
The lower the ratio, the better it is for the company since the company would be then
able to pay off to its shareholders in case of liquidation without any burden.
TATA STEEL has made efforts to lower the ratio and finally succeeded to do so. If we
consider the ratios for the year 2010-2011, we can see that TATA ATEEL is in a better position than the other
two companies.

55

3. DEBT TO NET WORTH RATIO - The net debt to net worth ratio has significance to lenders, analysts
and business managers. If affects the ability of a company to borrow money and to finance its growth. A
business owner needs to know the optimal debt to net worth ratio for the benefit of its company. The net
debt should never be higher than the net worth; it is a bad sign for the company.
FORMULA = LONG TERM DEBT
NET WORTH
LONG TERM DEBT = SECURED LOANS + UNSECURED LOANS CASH & BANK
CURRENT INVESTMENTS
NET WORTH= EQUITY SHARE CAPITAL + PREFERENCE SHARE CAPITAL+ RESERVES &
SURPLUS MISCELLANOUS EXPENSES TO THE EXTENT NOT WRITTEN OFF.
FINANCIAL YEAR 2006-2007
COMPANY
TATA STEEL
SAIL
JSW

LONG TERM
DEBT
(1728.55)
(5454.57)
3642.29

NET WORTH
13893.62
17184
5399.18

DEBT- NET
WORTH RATIO
(0.125)
(0.32)
0.67

FINANCIAL YEAR 2007-2008


COMPANY
TATA STEEL
SAIL
JSW

LONG TERM
DEBT
16519.85
(10737.77)
6283.78

NET WORTH
27145.62
23004.09
7677.25

DEBT- NET
WORTH RATIO
0.61
(0.47)
0.82

FINANCIAL YEAR 2008-2009


COMPANY
TATA STEEL
SAIL
JSW

LONG TERM
DEBT
22086.25
(10714.20)
9602.56

NET WORTH
30071.19
27984.10
7959.25

DEBT- NET
WORTH RATIO
0.73
(0.38)
1.21

FINANCIAL YEAR 2009-2010


COMPANY
TATA STEEL
SAIL
JSW

LONG TERM
DEBT
20285.83
(5925.12)
9529.64

NET WORTH
36961.80
33316.70
9706.34

DEBT- NET
WORTH RATIO
0.55
(0.18)
0.98

NET WORTH

DEBT- NET

FINANCIAL YEAR 2010-2011


COMPANY

LONG TERM

56

DEBT
21159.81
2638.56
5965.65

TATA STEEL
SAIL
JSW

WORTH RATIO
0.45
0.07
0.36

46944.63
37069.47
16695.89

1.4
1.21

1.2

0.98

1
0.8

0.82
0.67

0.6

0.73
0.61

0.55
0.45

TATA S TEEL
0.36

0.4

S AIL
JS W

0.2

0.07

0
-0.2

2006-2007
-0.13

-0.4

-0.32

-0.6

2007-2008

2008-2009

2009-2010

2010-2011

-0.18
-0.38
-0.47

INTERPRETATION:
This ratio is used in the analysis of financial statements to show the amount of protection available to
creditors. A high ratio usually indicates that the business has a lot of risk because it must meet
principal and interest on its obligations.
TATA STEEL has a fluctuating ratio throughout the five years. But anyhow it has tried to
maintain its position by reducing the debts and increasing the net worth of the company.
SAIL has a negative ratio but in the year 2010-2011 it has finally achieved a positive ratio.
JSW has a fluctuating graph throughout the five years but in the year 2010-2011, it has been
able to lower the ratio and thus reduce the risk involved in the business.

57

4. FIXED ASSETS TO LONG TERM RATIO - This ratio indicates the proportion of long-term funds
deployed in fixed assets. The higher the ratio, the safer will be the funds available in case of liquidation.
It also indicates the proportion of funds that is invested in working capital.
It indicates the level of fixed assets owned by a company in relation to the long-term debts of the
company. The higher the ratio the better it is for a company and the assets which are debt free and
fully owned by the company.
FORMULA =

FIXED ASSETS
LONG TERM LOANS

FIXED ASSETS = GROSS FIXED ASSETS DEPRICIATION


LONG TERM LOANS = SHARE CAPITAL+ RESERVES+ LONG TERM LOANS
FINANCIAL YEAR 2006-2007
COMPANY

FIXED ASSETS

LONG TERM
FUNDS

TATA STEEL
SAIL
JSW

11040.56
11597.71
8189.10

23594.42
21493.67
9767.08

FIXED ASSTES TO
LONG TERM
RATIO
0.47
0.54
0.84

FINANCIAL YEAR 2007-2008


COMPANY

FIXED ASSETS

LONG TERM
FUNDS

TATA STEEL
SAIL
JSW

12623.56
11571.31
10955.49

45322.42
26108.81
15223.78

FIXED ASSTES TO
LONG TERM
RATIO
0.28
0.44
0.72

FINANCIAL YEAR 2008-2009


COMPANY

FIXED ASSETS

LONG TERM
FUNDS

TATA STEEL
SAIL
JSW

14482.22
12268.83
13086.44

57122.44
35522.89
19231.88

FIXED ASSTES TO
LONG TERM
RATIO
0.25
0.35
0.68

FINANCIAL YEAR 2009-2010


COMPANY

FIXED ASSETS

TATA STEEL
SAIL

16006.03
13615.28

LONG TERM
FUNDS
62201
49827.95
58

FIXED ASSTES TO
LONG TERM
RATIO
0.26
0.27

JSW

16866.14

21291.44

0.79

FIXED ASSTES TO
LONG TERM
RATIO
0.25
0.26
0.74

FINANCIAL YEAR 2010-2011


COMPANY

FIXED ASSETS

LONG TERM
FUNDS

TATA STEEL
SAIL
JSW

18774.48
15082.66
21102.15

75067.57
57234.96
28647.23

0.9

0.84
0.79

0.8

0.74

0.72

0.68

0.7
0.6
0.5

0.54
0.47

TATA STEEL

0.44

0.4

SAIL

0.35
0.28

0.3

0.25

0.27
0.26

0.26
0.25

2008-2009

2009-2010

2010-2011

JSW

0.2
0.1
0
2006-2007

2007-2008

INTERPRETATION:
This is a difficult set of ratios to interpret as asset values are based on the historical cost. An increase
in the fixed asset figure may result from the replacement of an asset at an increased price or the
purchase of an additional asset intended to increase the production capacity.
A latter transaction might be expected to result in increased sales.

59

5. PROPERITARY RATIO - This ratio indicates the proportion of long-term funds deployed in fixed
assets. The higher the ratio, the safer will be the funds available in case of liquidation. It also indicates
the proportion of funds that is invested in working capital.
It indicates the level of fixed assets owned by a company in relation to the long-term debts of the
company. The higher the ratio the better it is for a company and the assets which are debt free and
fully owned by the company.
FORMULA =

NET WORTH
TOTAL ASSETS

NET WORTH = EQUITY SHARE CAPITAL + PREFERENCE SHARE CAPITAL+ RESERVES &
SURPLUS MISCELLANOUS EXPENSES TO THE EXTENT NOT WRITTEN OFF.
TOTAL ASSETS = FIXED ASSETS + CURRENT ASSETS
FINANCIAL YEAR 2006-2007
COMPANY

NET WORTH

TOTAL ASSETS

TATA STEEL
SAIL
JSW

13893.62
17184
5399.18

25597.50
22906.33
10779.74

PROPERITARY
RATIO
0.54
0.75
0.50

FINANCIAL YEAR 2007-2008


COMPANY

NET WORTH

TOTAL ASSETS

TATA STEEL
SAIL
JSW

27145.62
23004.09
7677.25

47075.52
27677.41
16475.62

PROPERITARY
RATIO
0.57
0.83
0.47

FINANCIAL YEAR 2008-2009


COMPANY

NET WORTH

TOTAL ASSETS

TATA STEEL
SAIL
JSW

30071.19
27984.10
7959.25

58741.77
36855.04
20653.04

PROPERITARY
RATIO
0.52
0.76
0.39

FINANCIAL YEAR 2009-2010


COMPANY

NET WORTH

TOTAL ASSETS

TATA STEEL
SAIL
JSW

36961.80
33316.70
9706.34

64232.78
51242.87
23256.39

PROPERITARY
RATIO
0.58
0.65
0.42

FIANANCIAL YEAR 2010-2011


COMPANY

NET WORTH

TOTAL ASSETS
60

PROPERITARY

TATA STEEL
SAIL
JSW

46944.63
37069.47
17225.27

0.9
0.8

78555.91
58726.03
31493.65

0.83
0.76

0.75

0.7
0.6
0.5

RATIO
0.60
0.63
0.55

0.65
0.54

0.58

0.57
0.52

0.5

0.63
0.6
0.55

0.47

0.4

TATA S TEEL

0.42

0.39

S AIL
JS W

0.3
0.2
0.1
0
2006-2007

2007-2008

2008-2009

2009-2010

2010-2011

INTERPRETATION:
Proprietary ratio indicates the proportion of total assets funded by owners or shareholders. A higher
proprietary ratio is an indicator of sound financial position from the long term point of view because
it means a large proportion of total assets are provided by equity and hence the firm is thus less
dependent on the external sources of finance. A lower proprietary ratio is a danger signal for l.ong
term lenders as it indicates a lower margin of safety available to them.
TATA STEEL has maintained an overall consistent ratio throughout as in
the five year time.
The proprietary ratio of SAIL has been declining since the year 2007-2008.
The proprietary ratio of JSW has been increasing since 2008-2009.
TATA STEEL has been improving over the years and though SAIL has a
declining ratio throughout but anyhow it is in a better position than the other companies.

61

6. INTEREST COVER - This ratio is also known as time interest - earned ratio. It measures the firms
ability to make contractual interest payments. This ratio measures the debt servicing capacity of a firm
insofar as fixed interest on long term loan is concerned. It indicates the extent to which a fall in EBIT is
tolerable in that the ability of the firm to service its interest payments would not be adversely affected.
For instance, coverage of five times would indicate that a fall in operating earnings only to up to onefifth level can be tolerated.
The higher the ratio the greater is the ability of the firm to handle fixed charge
liabilities and the more assured is the payment of interest to them. However, too high a ratio would imply
unused debt capacity. A low ratio is danger signal that the firm is using excessive debt and does not have the
ability to offer assured payment of interest to the lenders.
FORMULA = PBIT
INTEREST
FINANCIAL YEAR 2006-2007
COMPANY

PBIT

INTEREST

TATA STEEL
6435.55
SAIL
9754.75
JSW
2314.72
FINANCIAL YEAR 2007-2008

173.90
332.13
399.54

COMPANY

INTEREST

PBIT

TATA STEEL
7945.06
SAIL
11719.67
JSW
2924.56
FINANCIAL YEAR 2008-2009

878.70
250.94
440.44

COMPANY

INTEREST

PBIT

TATA STEEL
8468.30
SAIL
9656.69
JSW
1474.88
FINANCIAL YEAR 2009-2010

1152.69
253.24
797.25

COMPANY

INTEREST

PBIT

TATA STEEL
8722.70
SAIL
10534.04
JSW
3678.57
FINANCIAL YEAR 2010-2011

1508.40
402.01
858.92

COMPANY

PBIT

INTEREST

TATA STEEL
SAIL
JSW

11077.34
7669.26
3477.46

1300.49
474.95
695.18
62

INTEREST
COVER
37.01
29.37
5.79
INTEREST
COVER
9.04
46.70
6.64
INTEREST
COVER
7.35
38.13
1.85
INTEREST
COVER
5.78
26.20
4.28
INTEREST
COVER
8.52
16.15
5.00

46.7

50
45
40
35

38.13

37.01
29.37

26.2

30

TATA S TEEL

25

S AIL
16.15

20
15
10

9.04
5.79

6.64

8.52

7.35

5.78
1.85

JS W

4.28

0
2006-2007

2007-2008

2008-2009

2009-2010

2010-2011

INTERPRETATION:

The interest cover ratio is used to determine how easily a company can be relieved of its burden to pay
interest expenses on outstanding debt. The lower the ratio, the more the company is burdened by debt
expense. When a company's interest coverage ratio is only 1.5 or lower, its ability to meet interest expenses
may be questionable.
TATA STEEL has had a steep fall in the ratio from the year 2006-2007(37.01) to the year
2007-2008(9.04) and this was mainly because the interest expenses had risen by leaps and bounds. And
thereafter the interest expenses continued to rise.
SAIL has a fluctuating ratio. The rise in the ratio was because of the reduction in the interest
expenses and a sudden fall was when the interest expenses were high.
JSW has witnessed a ratio of 1.85 for the year 2008-2009 because this year the profit before
interest and tax was 1474.88 which was quite less as compared to the previous year and the interest expenses
were 797.25 which had risen by 1.8 times as compared to the previous year.

63

7. DIVIDEND COVER RATIO - It measures the ability of a firm to pay dividend on preference shares
which carry a stated rate of return. This ratio is the ratio of net profits after taxes (EAT) and the amount
of preference dividend. The higher the coverage the better it is and vice versa
FORMULA = NET PROFIT AFTER TAX
DIVIDEND

FINANCIAL YEAR 2006-2007


COMPANY
TATA STEEL
SAIL
JSW

PROFIT AFTER
TAX
4222.15
6202.29
1292

DIVIDEND

DIVIDEND COVER

1104.33
1478.40
199.39

3.82
4.20
6.48

DIVIDEND

DIVIDEND COVER

1393.55
1787.16
241.49

3.36
4.22
7.16

DIVIDEND

DIVIDEND COVER

1492.5
1255.16
55.41

3.49
4.92
17.30

DIVIDEND

DIVIDEND COVER

878.45
1590.55
240.93

5.75
4.25
8.40

DIVIDEND

DIVIDEND COVER

FINANCIAL YEAR 2007-2008


COMPANY
TATA STEEL
SAIL
JSW

PROFIT AFTER
TAX
4687.03
7536.78
1728.19

FINANCIAL YEAR 2008-2009


COMPANY
TATA STEEL
SAIL
JSW

PROFIT AFTER
TAX
5201.74
6174.81
958.50

FINANCIAL YEAR 2009-2010


COMPANY
TATA STEEL
SAIL
JSW

PROFIT AFTER
TAX
5046.80
6754.37
2022.74

FINANCIAL YEAR 2010-2011


COMPANY
TATA STEEL
SAIL

PROFIT AFTER
TAX
6865.69
4904.74

1307.77
1152.45
64

5.25
4.26

JSW

2010.67

350.09

5.74

20
17.3

18
16
14
12

TATA S TEEL

10
8

6.48

JS W

7.16

6
4

S AIL

8.4

4.92

4.2
3.82

4.22
3.36

3.49

2006-2007

2007-2008

2008-2009

5.75
4.25

5.74
5.25
4.26

2009-2010

2010-2011

2
0

INTERPRETATION:

The dividend cover ratio means that how easily the company can be relieved of its burden of paying the
dividends to the company.
TATA STEEL has been paying off its dividends at a consistent rate. And it seems that it has been
following a conservative approach.
JSW had paid a very high dividend for the year 2008-2009, which means that the company had declared
ala large part of its profit as dividend and thus following a liberal approach for paying the dividends.

65

8. EBIDTA TO TURNOVER RATIO - This ratio is used to assess a companys profitability by comparing
its turnover and earnings. Since EBITDA is derived from revenue this would indicate the percentage of a
company remaining after operating expenses.
Generally a higher ratio would indicate that the company is able to
keep its earnings at a good level through efficient processes that have kept certain expenses low.

FORMULA = EARNING BEFORE INTEREST, TAX AND DEPRICIATION


TURNOVER
FINANCIAL YEAR 2006-2007
COMPANY

EBIDTA

TURNOVER

TATA STEEL
SAIL
JSW

7254.84
10966.23
2812.95

17984.76
35924.07
8699.59

EBIDTA TO
TURNOVER RATIO
0.40
0.31
0.32

FINANCIAL YEAR 2007-2008


COMPANY

EBIDTA

TURNOVER

TATA STEEL
SAIL
JSW

8779.67
12955.15
3611.74

20028.28
41890.91
11677.14

EBIDTA TO
TURNOVER RATIO
0.44
0.31
0.31

FINANCIAL YEAR 2008-2009


COMPANY

EBIDTA

TURNOVER

TATA STEEL
SAIL
JSW

9441.70
10941.81
2302.54

24624.04
46248.61
14260.81

EBIDTA TO
TURNOVER RATIO
0.38
0.24
0.16

FINANCIAL YEAR 2009-2010


COMPANY

EBIDTA

TURNOVER

TATA STEEL
SAIL
JSW

9805.88
11871.28
4801.98

25875.77
43319.61
18735.32

EBIDTA TO
TURNOVER RATIO
0.38
0.27
0.26

TURNOVER

EBIDTA TO

FINANCIAL YEAR 2010-2011


COMPANY

EBIDTA

66

TATA STEEL
SAIL
JSW

12223.53
9155.06
4856.17

TURNOVER RATIO
0.40
0.20
0.21

30187.02
44918.67
23445.88

0.5
0.44

0.45
0.4
0.35

0.4

0.38

0.32
0.31

0.38

0.4

0.31
0.31

0.3

0.27

TATA S TEEL

0.24

0.25

0.20.21

0.2

0.16

S AIL
JS W

0.15
0.1
0.05
0
2006-2007

2007-2008

2008-2009

0.26
2009-2010

2010-2011

INTERPRETATION:
EBIDTA to turnover ratio signifies that higher the ratio the better it is. Since it means that earnings
before interest, depreciation and taxation.
TATA STEEL has maintained a positive rising graph throughout. And it has a ratio better than
the other two companies.

67

9. EARNING PER SHARE - This ratio measures the profitability on a per share basis i.e. the amount that
they can get on every share held. The higher the ratio the more amount the equity shareholders receive.
FORMULA =
PROFIT ATTRIBUTABLE TO SHAREHOLDERS
WEIGHTED AVERAGE NUMBER OF ORDINARY SHARES FOR BASIC EPS
FINANCIAL YEAR 2006-2007
COMPANY

TATA STEEL
SAIL
JSW

PROFIT O
ATTRIBUTABLE
SHAREHOLDERS
4222.15
6202.29
1259.35

WEIGHTED
AVERAGE NO. OF
ORDINARY SHARES
646823122
4130400545
157208820

EARNING PER
SHARE

WEIGHTED
AVEARGE NO. OF
ORDINARY SHARES
697748601
4130400545
177855318

EARNING PER
SHARE

WEIGHTED
AVEARGE NO. OF
ORDINARY SHARES
730584834
4130400545
187048666

EARNING PER
SHARE

WEIGHTED
AVEARGE NO. OF
ORDINARY SHARES
828550811
4130400545
187048682

EARNING PER
SHARE

WEIGHTED
AVEARGE NO. OF
ORDINARY SHARES
907252572
4130400545
203595864

EARNING PER
SHARE

73.76
15.02
80.11

FINANCIAL YEAR 2007-2008


COMPANY

TATA STEEL
SAIL
JSW

PROFIT
ATTRIBUTABLE TO
SHAREHOLDERS
4687.03
7536.78
1694.19

67.17
18.25
95.26

FINANCIAL YEAR 2008-2009


COMPANY

TATA STEEL
SAIL
JSW

PROFIT
ATTRIBUTABLE TO
SHAREHOLDERS
5073.69
6174.81
424.58

69.45
14.95
22.70

FINANCIAL YEAR 2009-2010


COMPANY

TATA STEEL
SAIL
JSW

PROFIT
ATTRIBUTABLE TO
SHAREHOLDERS
4993.12
6754.37
1989.01

60.26
16.35
106.34

FINANCIAL YEAR 2010-2011


COMPANY

TATA STEEL
SAIL
JSW

PROFIT
ATTRIBUTABLE TO
SHAREHOLDERS
6861.15
4904.74
1978.24
68

75.63
11.87
97.17

2010-2011

97.17

11.87

2009-2010

75.63
106.34

16.35

60.26

22.7
14.95

2008-2009

2007-2008

TATA S TEEL

67.17
80.11

15.02

20

JS W

95.26

18.25

2006-2007

S AIL

69.45

73.76
40

60

80

100

120

INTERPRETATION:

The ratio is helpful in the determination of the market price of the equity share of the company. The ratio is
also helpful in estimating the capacity of company to declare dividends on equity shares.
Higher the EPS the better is the capital productivity. It is an important measure of the economic
performance of a corporate entity.
JSW has the highest EPS as compared to the other two firms. And TATA STEEL has been quite
consistent in maintaining its ratio throughout.

69

10. GROSS PROFIT MARGIN - The ratio measures the margin of profit available on sales. The higher the
ratio the better it is for the company. It reflects the efficiency with which a firm produces its products.
FORMULA = GROSS PROFIT * 100
SALES
FINANCIAL YEAR 2006-2007
COMPANY

GROSS PROFIT

SALES

TATA STEEL
SAIL
JSW

6153.98
8656.19
2169.49

17551.09
34223.92
8554.36

GROSS PROFIT
MARGIN
35.06
25.29
25.36

FINANCIAL YEAR 2007-2008


COMPANY

GROSS PROFIT

SALES

TATA STEEL
SAIL
JSW

7388.93
10057.87
2667.42

19693.28
39508.45
11420.00

GROSS PROFIT
MARGIN
37.52
25.46
23.35

FINANCIAL YEAR 2008-2009


COMPANY

GROSS PROFIT

SALES

TATA STEEL
SAIL
JSW

8160.03
8040.59
2005.45

24315.77
43150.08
14001.25

GROSS PROFIT
MARGIN
33.55
18.63
14.32

FINANCIAL YEAR 2009-2010


COMPANY

GROSS PROFIT

SALES

TATA STEEL
SAIL
JSW

7868.91
8190.83
3149.49

25021.98
40551.38
18202.48

GROSS PROFIT
MARGIN
31.44
20.20
17.30

FINANCIAL YEAR 2010-2011


COMPANY

GROSS PROFIT

SALES

TATA STEEL
SAIL
JSW

10286.67
5304.80
3194.82

29396.35
42718.71
23163.24

70

GROSS PROFIT
MARGIN
34.99
12.42
13.79

40
35

37.52
35.06

34.99

33.55
31.44

30
25.46
23.35

25.36
25.29
25

18.63

20

20.2

TATA S TEEL

17.3

14.32

15

S AIL
13.79
12.42

JS W

10
5
0
2006-2007

2007-2008

2008-2009

2009-2010

2010-2011

INTEPRETATION:

The ratio measures the margin of profit available on sales. The higher the ratio the better it is. The ratio of
TATA STEEL has been fluctuating but it has been on a constant platform. The sales figures have been rising
so the fluctuations in the ratio can be attributed to the difference in the prices of the raw materials, freights
and wages.
The gross profit ratio of SAIL has been falling and which is again because of
the rise in the prices of the raw materials, wages and freight which have ultimately reduced the margin of the
gross profit.
The gross profit margin of JSW has also decreased since the selling prices
have not risen in the same proportion to the increase in the cost of the raw materials and other expenses.
TATA STEEL has a much favourable ratio as compared to the other two
companies. SAIL can take some measures such as procure raw materials at a cheaper price or to increase the
selling price in order to improve its gross profit margin.

71

11. NET PROFIT MARGIN - This ratio measures the relationship between EBIT to sales. It indicates the
efficiency of the management in manufacturing, selling, administration and other activities of the firm. It
is the overall measure of a firms profitability. It is represented as a percentage.
A high net profit margin would ensure adequate returns to the
owners as well as enable a firm to withstand adverse economic conditions when selling price is
declining, cost of production is rising and demand for product id falling. A low net profit margin
has the opposite implication.
FORMULA = NET PROFIT BEFORE INTEREST AND TAX * 100
SALES
FINANCIAL YEAR 2006-2007
COMPANY

NPBIT

SALES

TATA STEEL
SAIL
JSW

6435.55
9754.75
2314.72

17551.09
34223.92
8554.36

NET PROFIT
MARGIN
36.67
28.50
27.06

FINANCIAL YEAR 2007-2008


COMPANY

NPBIT

SALES

TATA STEEL
SAIL
JSW

7945.06
11719.67
2924.56

19693.28
39508.45
11420.00

NET PROFIT
MARGIN
40.34
29.66
25.60

FINANCIAL YEAR 2008-2009


COMPANY

NPBIT

SALES

TATA STEEL
SAIL
JSW

8468.30
9656.69
1474.88

24315.77
43150.08
14001.25

NET PROFIT
MARGIN
34.82
22.38
10.53

FINANCIAL YEAR 2009-2010


COMPANY

NPBIT

SALES

TATA STEEL
SAIL
JSW

8722.70
10534.04
3678.57

25021.98
40551.38
18202.48
72

NET PROFIT
MARGIN
34.86
25.98
20.21

FINANCIAL YEAR 2010-2011


COMPANY

NPBIT

SALES

TATA STEEL
SAIL
JSW

11077.34
7669.26
3477.46

29396.35
42718.71
23163.248

45
40

40.34
37.82

36.67

35
30

NET PROFIT
MARGIN
37.68
17.95
15.01

28.5
27.06

34.86

34.82
29.66

25.98

25.6
22.38

25

20.21

20
15

TATA S TEEL
17.95
15.01

S AIL
JS W

10.53

10
5
0
2006-2007

2007-2008

2008-2009

2009-2010

2010-2011

INTERPRETATION:
Net profit ratio reflects the net profit margin on the total sales after deducting all the expenses but before
deducting the interest and taxation. This ratio measures the efficiency of the operation of the company.
The trend of the graph of the net profit ratio is quite similar to that of the gross profit
margin ratio. Higher the ratio the better it is. TATA STEEL has been quite efficient in managing the
operating expenses of the firm.

73

12. CASH PROFIT RATIO - The Cash Ratio is the most conservative of all these measures of cash
resources, as only actual cash and securities easily convertible to cash are used to measure cash
resources. The short-term liquidity of a company may be measured through cash ratio.
FORMULA = CASH PROFIT
SALES
CASH PROFIT= NET PROFIT+ DEPRICIATION
FINANCIAL YEAR 2006-2007
COMPANY

CASH PROFIT

SALES

TATA STEEL
SAIL
JSW

5041.44
7413.77
1790.23

17551.09
34223.92
8554.36

CASH PROFIT
RATIO
28.72
21.85
20.93

FINANCIAL YEAR 2007-2008


COMPANY

CASH PROFIT

SALES

TATA STEEL
SAIL
JSW

5521.64
8772.26
2415.37

19693.28
39508.45
11420.00

CASH PROFIT
RATIO
28.38
22.20
21.15

FINANCIAL YEAR 2008-2009


COMPANY

CASH PROFIT

SALES

TATA STEEL
SAIL
JSW

6175.14
7459.93
1313.16

24315.77
43150.08
14001.25

CASH PROFIT
RATIO
25.40
17.29
9.38

FINANCIAL YEAR 2009-2010


COMPANY

CASH PROFIT

SALES

TATA STEEL
SAIL
JSW

6129.98
8091.61
3146.15

25021.98
40551.38
18202.48

FINANCIAL YEAR 2010-2011


74

CASH PROFIT
RATIO
24.50
19.95
17.28

COMPANY

CASH PROFIT

SALES

TATA STEEL
SAIL
JSW

8011.88
6890.54
3389.38

29396.35
42718.71
23163.25

30

28.72

28.38

27.25
25.4

25

24.5

22.2
21.15

21.85
20.93

19.95
17.29

20

CASH PROFIT
RATIO
27.25
14.95
14.63

17.28
14.95
14.63

15

TATA S TEEL
S AIL
JS W

9.38
10

0
2006-2007

2007-2008

2008-2009

2009-2010

2010-2011

INTERPRETATION:
The ratio measures the cash generation in the business as a result of the operation expressed in terms
of sales. The cash profit ratio is more reliable indicator of performance where there are sharp
fluctuations in profit before tax and the net profit from year to year owing to the difference in
depreciation.
It facilitates the inter firm comparison of performance since different methods of depreciation
may be adopted by different companies.
TATA STEEL is ahead of the other two companies and has a better graph as compared to SAIL
and JSW.

75

13. RETURN ON ASSETS - Here the profitability is measured in terms of the relationship between net
profits and assets. The ROA may be also called as profit-to-asset ratio. It can be interpreted in two ways.
First, it measures managements ability and efficiency in using the firms assets to generate (operating)
profits. Second, it reports the total return accruing to all providers of capital (debt and equity),
independent of the source of capital.

FORMULA =
EBIT
AVERAGE TOTAL ASSETS
FINANCIAL YEAR 2006-2007
COMPANY

EBIT

TATA STEEL
6435.55
SAIL
9754.75
JSW
2314.72
FINANCILA YEAR 2007-2008
COMPANY

EBIT

TATA STEEL
7945.06
SAIL
11719.67
JSW
2924.56
FINANCIAL YEAR 2008-2009
COMPANY

EBIT

TATA STEEL
8468.30
SAIL
9656.69
JSW
1474.88
FINANCIAL YEAR 2009-2010
COMPANY

EBIT

TATA STEEL
8722.70
SAIL
10534.04
JSW
3678.57
FINANCIAL YEAR 2010-2011
COMPANY

EBIT

TATA STEEL

11077.34

AVERAGE TOTAL
ASSETS
20107.33
20644.91

RETURN ON
ASSETS
0.32
0.47

AVERAGE TOTAL
ASSETS
36336.51
25291.87
13627.68

RETURN ON
ASSETS
0.22
0.46
0.21

AVERAGE TOTAL
ASSETS
52908.65
32266.23
18564.33

RETURN ON
ASSETS
0.16
0.30
0.08

AVERAGE TOTAL
ASSETS
61487.28
44143.57
21954.72

RETURN ON
ASSETS
0.14
0.24
0.17

AVERAGE TOTAL
ASSETS
71394.35

RETURN ON
ASSETS
0.11

76

SAIL
JSW

0.5

7669.26
3477.46

0.47

54984.45
27375.02

0.14
0.13

0.46

0.45
0.4
0.35

0.32

0.3

0.3
0.25

TATA S TEEL

0.24
0.21

S AIL

0.21

0.2

0.16 0.17

0.15

JS W
0.14 0.13

0.15
0.14

2009-2010

2010-2011

0.08

0.1
0.05
0
2006-2007

2007-2008

2008-2009

INTERPRETATION:

The ratio indicates how profitable a company is relative to its total assets. The ratio illustrates how well
management is employing companys total assets to make a profit. The higher the return, the more
efficient management is in utilizing the assets base.
Here we can conclude that SAIL has not been utilizing its asset base efficiently and so the graph has
taken a downward trend.
TATA STEEL has also not been very efficient in utilizing the asset base of the company.

77

14. RETURN ON AVERAGE NET WORTH - This ratio measures the return on the total equity funds of
ordinary shares. From this ratio it can be judged whether the firm has earned a satisfactory return for its
shareholders or not. The higher the ratio, the better it is for the shareholders.
FORMULA= PROFIT AFTER TAX
AVERAGE NET WORTH
FINANCIAL YEAR 2006-2007
COMPANY

PROFIT AFTER
TAX

AVERAGE NET
WORTH

TATA STEEL
SAIL
JSW

4222.15
6202.29
1292

11697.83
14784.80

RETURN ON
AVEARGE NET
WORTH
0.36
0.42

FINANCIAL YEAR 2007-2008


COMPANY

PROFIT AFTER
TAX

AVERAGE NET
WORTH

TATA STEEL
SAIL
JSW

4687.03
7536.78
1728.19

20519.62
20094.05
6538.22

RETURN ON
AVEARGE NET
WORTH
0.23
0.38
0.26

FINANCIAL YEAR 2008-2009


COMPANY

PROFIT AFTER
TAX

AVERAGE NET
WORTH

TATA STEEL
SAIL
JSW

5201.74
6174.81
958.50

28608.41
25494.10
7827.25

RETURN ON
AVEARGE NET
WORTH
0.18
0.24
0.12

FINANCIAL YEAR 2009-2010


COMPANY

PROFIT AFTER
TAX

AVERAGE NET
WORTH

TATA STEEL
SAIL

5046.80
6754.37

33516.50
30650.40
78

RETURN ON
AVEARGE NET
WORTH
0.15
0.22

JSW

2022.74

8832.80

0.23

RETURN ON
AVEARGE NET
WORTH
0.16
0.14
0.15

FIANANCIAL YEAR 2010-2011


COMPANY

PROFIT AFTER
TAX

AVERAGE NET
WORTH

TATA STEEL
SAIL
JSW

6865.69
4904.74
2010.67

41953.22
35193.09
13465.81

0.45
0.4

0.42
0.38

0.36

0.35
0.3

0.26

0.24
0.23

0.23

0.25

0.22

0.18

0.2

0.15 0.15
0.12

0.15

TATA S TEEL
0.16
0.14

S AIL
JS W

0.1
0.05
0
2006-2007

2007-2008

2008-2009

2009-2010

2010-2011

INTERPRETATION:

It expresses the net profit in terms of equity shareholders fund. It is an important yardstick of performance
for equity shareholders since it indicates the return on funds employed by them. However this measure is
based on the historical net worth and will be high for old plants and low for new plants.
The factor which motivates the shareholders to invest in a company is the
expectations of an adequate rate of return on their funds, they will want to assess the rate of return in order
to decide whether to continue their investments or not.

79

15. RETURN ON AVERAGE CAPITAL EMPLOYED - Return on average capital employed is a


profitability ratio. The term capital employed refers to long-term funds supplied by the lenders and
owners of the firm. Capital employed basis provides a test of profitability related to the sources of longterm funds. It is an insight into how efficiently the long-term funds of owners and lenders are being used.
The higher the ratio, the more efficient is the use of capital employed.

CAPITAL EMPLOYED = TOTAL FUNDS EMPLOYED MISCELLANOUS EXPENSES TO


THE EXTENT NOT WRITTEN OFF
COMPANY

EBIT

AVERAGE CAPITAL
EMPLOYED

TATA STEEL
SAIL
JSW

6435.55
9754.75
2314.72

19879.43
20601.58

COMPANY

EBIT

AVERAGE CAPITAL
EMPLOYED

TATA STEEL
SAIL
JSW

7945.06
11719.67
2924.56

36157.69
25326.71
13530.25

COMPANY

EBIT

AVERAGE CAPITAL
EMPLOYED

TATA STEEL
SAIL
JSW

8468.30
9656.69
1474.88

52778.56
32236.49
18564.33

RETURN ON
AVERAGE CAPITAL
EMPLOYED
0.16
0.30
0.08

COMPANY

EBIT

AVERAGE CAPITAL
EMPLOYED

RETURN ON
AVERAGE CAPITAL

80

RETURN ON
AVERAGE CAPITAL
EMPLOYED
0.32
0.47

RETURN ON
AVERAGE CAPITAL
EMPLOYED
0.22
0.46
0.22

EMPLOYED
0.14
0.24
0.17

TATA STEEL
SAIL
JSW

8722.70
10534.04
3678.57

61434.74
44048.96
21954.72

COMPANY

EBIT

AVERAGE CAPITAL
EMPLOYED

TATA STEEL
SAIL
JSW

11077.34
7669.26
3477.46

71394.35
54984.45
27375.02

0.5

0.47

RETURN ON
AVERAGE CAPITAL
EMPLOYED
0.16
0.14
0.13

0.46

0.45
0.4
0.35

0.32

0.3

0.3
0.25

0.22

S AIL

0.2

0.16

0.17

0.15
0.1

TATA S TEEL

0.24

0.22

0.14

0.13

0.16
0.14

JS W

0.08

0.05
0
2006-2007

2007-2008

2008-2009

2009-2010

2010-2011

INTERPRETATION:

Return on average capital employed ratio narrows the focus to gain a better understanding of a company's
ability to generate returns from its available capital base.
By comparing net income to the sum of a company's debt and equity
capital, investors can get a clear picture of how the use of leverage impacts a company's profitability.
Financial analysts consider the ROCE measurement to be a more comprehensive profitability indicator
because it gauges management's ability to generate earnings from a company's total pool of capital.

81

16. DIVIDEND PAYOUT RATIO - This ratio indicates the percentage PAT distributed as dividends to
equity shareholders. It is also known as pay-out ratio. For instance PAT are Rs. 500000 and the dividend
is Rs. 300000 then the dividend pay -out ratio would be 60%. This implies that 40% of the profits of the
firm are retained (retention ratio) and 60% distributed as dividends. Therefore, the higher the ratio the
more dividends can be received.
= DIVIDEND (EQUITY)/ PROFIT AFTER TAX
FINANCIAL YEAR 2006-2007
COMPANY

DIVIDEND(EQUITY)

PROFIT AFTER TAX

TATA STEEL
SAIL
JSW

1104.33
1478.40
199.39

4222.15
6202.29
1292

DIVIDEND PAYOUT
RATIO
26.16
23.89
15.43

FINANCIAL YEAR 2007-2008


COMPANY

DIVIDEND(EQUITY)

PROFIT AFTER TAX

TATA STEEL
SAIL
JSW

1393.55
1787.16
241.49

4687.03
7536.78
1728.19

DIVIDEND PAYOUT
RATIO
29.73
23.71
13.97

FINANCIAL YEAR 2008-2009


COMPANY

DIVIDEND(EQUITY)

PROFIT AFTER TAX

TATA STEEL
SAIL
JSW

1492.5
1255.16
55.41

5201.74
6174.81
958.50

DIVIDEND PAYOUT
RATIO
28.69
20.33
5.78

FINANCIAL YEAR 2009-2010


COMPANY

DIVIDEND(EQUITY)

PROFIT AFTER TAX

TATA STEEL

878.45

5046.80
82

DIVIDEND PAYOUT
RATIO
17.41

SAIL
JSW

1590.55
240.93

6754.37
2022.74

23.55
11.91

DIVIDEND PAYOUT
RATIO
19.05
23.50
17.41

FINANCIAL YEAR 2010-2011


COMPANY

DIVIDEND(EQUITY)

PROFIT AFTER TAX

TATA STEEL
SAIL
JSW

1307.77
1152.45
350.09

6865.69
4904.74
2010.67

35
29.73

30

28.69

26.16
25

23.89

23.71

23.55
20.3

20

19.05

17.41
15.43

15

23.5

17.41

TATA S TEEL
S AIL

13.97

JS W

11.97

10
5.78
5
0
2006-2007

2007-2008

2008-2009

2009-2010

2010-2011

INTERPRETATION:

This ratio identifies the percentage of earnings (net income) per common share allocated to paying
cash dividends to shareholders. The dividend payout ratio is an indicator of how well earnings support the
dividend payment.
It indicates the extent to the net profit distributed to the shareholders as dividend. A high payout
signifies a liberal distribution policy and a low payout reflects conservative distribution policy,

83

RECOMMENDATION:
Tata steel should try to improve its solvency so that at the time of crisis they dont have to sell of

their inventory to pay off debts.


They should maintain quick ratio above or equal to 1.0.
Fluctuations in operating cycle should be reduced.
TATA STEEL must keep eye on its WIP conversion period.
TATA STEEL should try to minimize its inventory conversion period and also try to minimize the

average age of stock to reduce the cost of inventories.


As sale price per unit is lesser than the competitors it must keep trend increasing mode of sales to
reduce the blockage of its price in its inventory.
Try to generate more revenue from other country.
TATA STEEL should try for acquisition of more mines in India to reduce the raw material
outsourcing or import cost.
There should be a proper balance between the current assets and the currents liabilities. The working
capital became negative due to an improper balance.
It should not allow its net debt to become negative. A negative net debt indicates more cash and less
debt which means that the company is not investing enough in its growth.
New and advanced concept must be introduced in inventory control management.
Adequate planning is required for procurement of store items.
Advance payments should be avoided. If at all advance payments are required, it should be against
securities like bank guarantees etc.
The essence of effective working capital management is proper cash flow forecasting. This should
take into account the unforeseen events, market cycles, sudden fall in demand, fall in selling price,
loss in prime customers etc. This is a very important factor that has to be taken into account.
84

CONCLUSION
Tata Steel has been analyzed in terms of financial aspects especially working capital and financial ratios. A
comparison has been made with JSW and SAIL to see the position of Tata Steel Ltd. in the industry.
Working capital management is a very crucial part of any organization. It needs to maintain its working
capital efficiently for its day to day operations to take place. An organization needs proper liquidity to meet
its obligations on time.
Ratio analysis is also a very important part of a business. It is a platform to judge a company based on
liquidity, profitability etc. It is very crucial for banks, investors, creditors etc. It also makes comparisons
easier.
Tata Steel has been able to maintain a good liquidity position throughout. It has been able to pay back its
liabilities on time and also has been able to give dividends on time to its shareholders. It has also maintained
a good level of EPS. The inventory turnover has been maintained efficiently which we can see from the high
inventory turnover ratio.

85

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Gerald I. White, Ashwinpaul C. Sondhi & Dov Fried (2011). The Analysis And Use Of Financial
Statements- Third edition.

M Y Khan & P K Jain (2010). Management Accounting- Fifth Edition.

http://www.tatasteel.com/about-us/company-profile.asp

http://www.ey.com/Publication/vwLUAssets/Global_Steel_Report_2010-2011/$FILE/Global%20Steel
%20Report%202010-2011%20FULL%20REPORT.pdf

zenithresearch.org.in/images/stories/pdf/2012/Jan/ZIJMR/13 SURESH VADDE Steel_paper.pdf

http://www.zacks.com/stock/news/49743/steel-industry-outlook-%96-march-2011

Research and Markets: Analyzing the Indian Steel Industry 2012 Edition is Completed with An
Analysis of the Major Players in the Indian Steel Sector | Japan Metal Bulletin

Top Indian Steel Companies Performance | News From Business, Finance, Share Market Real Estate

86

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen