Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
ON
WORKING CAPITAL MANAGEMENT AND
RATIO ANALYSIS
At
TATA STEEL
Content
S. No
TOPIC
PAGE NO
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
OBJECTIVE OF STUDY
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
COLLECTION OF DATA
COMPANY PROFILE
SWOT ANALYSIS
WORKING CAPITAL
NET WORKING CAPITAL
FINANCIAL RATIOS OF TATA STEEL
COMPARITIVE ANALYSIS OF TATA STEEL, SAIL,
06
07
07
08
09
15
16
25
28
38
11.
12.
13.
14.
JSW
FINANCIAL RATIOS OF TATA STEEL, SAIL, JSW
RECOMMENDATION
CONCLUSION
BIBLIOGRAPHY
48
84
85
86
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Different businesses will have different working capital characteristics. There are 3 main aspects to these
differences:
a) Holding inventory
b) Taking time to pay suppliers and other accounts payable
c) Allowing customers (accounts payable) time to pay
a) Food supermarkets and other retailers receive most of their sales in the form of cash, credit card or
debit card. However, they will buy on credit from suppliers. They will therefore have the benefit of
significant cash holdings which they may chose to invest.
b) A wholesaler supplies other companies and is likely to buy and sell mainly on credit. The flow of
cash will have to be managed carefully. Such a company may have to rely on short-term borrowings and
overdrafts.
c) Small companies with a limited trading record may find it difficult to obtain trade credit. At the same
time customers will expect to receive the normal credit period to settle accounts.
Working capital is the capital required for maintenance of day-to-day business
operations. The present day competitive market environment calls for an efficient management of working
capital. The reason for this is attributed to the fact that an ineffective working capital management may force
the firm to stop its business operations, may even lead to bankruptcy. Hence the goal of working capital
management is not just concerned with the management of current assets & current liabilities but also in
maintaining a satisfactory level of working capital. Holding of current assets in substantial amount
strengthens the liquidity position & reduces the riskiness but only at the expense of profitability. Therefore
achieving risk-return trade off is significant in holding of current assets. While cash outflows are predictable
it runs contrary in case of cash inflows. Sales program of any business concern does not bring back cash
immediately. There is a time lag that exists between sale of goods & sales realization. The capital
requirement during this time lag is maintained by working capital in the form of current assets. The whole
process of this conversion is explained by the operating cycle concept.
Working capital management involves the relationship between a firm's shortterm assets and its short-term liabilities. The goal of working capital management is to ensure that a firm is
able to continue its operations and that it has sufficient ability to satisfy both maturing short-term debt and
upcoming operational expenses. The management of working capital involves managing inventories,
accounts receivable and payable, and cash.
There are many ratios that can be calculated from the financial statements pertaining to
a company's performance, activity, financing and liquidity. Some common ratios include the price-earnings
ratio, debt-equity ratio, earnings per share, asset turnover and working capital.
3
TATA STEEL has been managing the various aspect of working capital through continuous efforts over a
long period of time.
The present study is trying to investigate the different aspects of working capital
management at TATA STEEL. Working capital is generally the net difference between the total assets
and the liabilities of the company. So an attempt to understand as to how the company manages the
working capital has been done.
In my project work we are trying to identify the various systematic processes in
managing the working capital.
The study is trying to identify the various liquidity, profitability, solvency and the
turnover positions of the company as a tool of performance which will lead us to identify the financial
soundness of the company.
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
The study will be based on the QUANTATIVE and QUALITATIVE approach of the working capital
management model at TATA STEEL needs a thorough study. With the help of RATIO ANALYSIS &
TREND ANALYSIS the result of the control mechanism can be summarised which will help in
identifying the effectiveness of the system under the preview. The data for the companies under
analysis has been taken from their respective websites of the companies. `MICROSOFT EXCEL has
been used as a tool for different calculation purposes and developing the charts.
COLLECTION OF DATA:
The data has been collected from the primary and secondary sources:
i) Primary data
(1) Department visit- discussion with the concerned person and interviewing officers in accounts
and finance sector.
(2) Observation method.
ii) Secondary data
(1) Annual reports
(2) Journals and magazines
(3) Study of files and office documents
4
The Tata Group of Companies has always believed strongly in the concept of collaborative growth, and this
vision has seen it emerge as one of India's and the world's most respected and successful business
conglomerates. The Tata Group has traced a route of growth that spans through six continents and embraces
diverse cultures. The total revenue of Tata companies, taken together, was 67.4 billion USD (around
Rs319,534 crore) in 2009-10, with 57 per cent of this coming from business outside India. In the face of
trying economic challenges in recent times, the Tata Group has steered Indias ascent in the global map
through its unwavering focus on sustainable development. Over 395,000 people worldwide are currently
employed in the seven business sectors in which the Tata Group Companies operate. It is the largest
employer in India in the Private Sector and continues to lead with the same commitment towards social and
community responsibilities that it has shown in the past.
The Tata Group of Companies has business operations (114 companies and subsidiaries) in seven defined
sectors Materials, Engineering, Information Technology and Communications, Energy, Services,
Consumer Products and Chemicals. Tata Steel with its acquisition of Corus has secured a place among the
top ten steel manufacturers in the world and it is the Tata Groups flagship Company. Other Group
Companies in the different sectors are Tata Motors, Tata Consultancy Services (TCS), Tata
Communications, Tata Power, Indian Hotels, Tata Global Beverages and Tata Chemicals.
Tata Motors is Indias largest automobile company by revenue and is among the top five commercial
vehicle manufacturers in the world. Jaguar and Landrover are now part of Tata Motors portfolio.
Tata Consultancy Services (TCS) is an integrated software solutions provider with delivery centres in more
than 18 countries. It ranked fifth overall, and topped the list for IT services, in Bloomberg Businessweek's
12th annual 'Tech 100', a ranking of the world's best performing tech companies.
Tata Power has pioneered hydro-power generation in India and is the largest power generator (production
capacity of 2300 MW) in India in the private sector.
Indian Hotels Company (Taj Hotels, resorts and palaces) happens to be the leading chain of hotels in India
and one of the largest hospitality groups in Asia. It has a presence in 12 countries in 5 continents.
Tata Global Beverages (formerly Tata Tea), with its major acquisitions like Tetley and Good Earth is at
present the second largest global branded tea operation.
When Jamshedji Tata gave shape to his vision of nation building by forming what was to become the Tata
Group in 1868, he had envisaged India as an independent strength politically, economically and socially. In
order to become a force that the world has to reckon with, the Tata Group has always ventured into path
breaking territory and pioneered developments in industries of national importance.
As a policy, the Tata Group Companies promote and encourage economic, social and educational
development in the community, returning wealth to the society they serve. Two-thirds of the equity of Tata
Sons is held in philanthropic trusts that take care of endowments towards improvement programmes in these
spheres.
Through the years, the Tata Group has been amongst the most prestigious corporate presences in the world
governed by its principles of business ethics. Its foray into international business has been recognised by
various bodies and institutions. Brand Finance, a UK based consultancy firm after a recent valuation of the
Tata brand at $11.22 billion has ranked it 65th among the world's top 100 brands. In Business
Week magazine's list of the 25 most innovative companies the Tata name appears 13th and The Reputation
Institute, USA has evaluated the Tata Group as the 11th in a global study of the most reputed companies.
In the road ahead, the Tata Group is focusing on integration of new technologies in its operations and
breaking new grounds in product development. The Eka supercomputer had been ranked the worlds fourth
6
fastest in 2008 and the launch of the Nano has been a benchmark for the auto industry specifically and the
economy in general.
With a holistic approach in all its business operations, a loyal and dedicated workforce and its rooted belief
in value creation and corporate citizenship, the Tata Group is always ready to realise its vision and
objectives. The challenges of the future will only help to enhance the Groups performance and transform
newer dreams to reality.
Iron & Steel Works at Jamshedpur .He envisaged and conceived a steel
town to the very last detail, later to be named as Jamshedpur.
J.N. Tata had exhorted to his sons to pursue and develop his lifes work ;
his elder son, Sir Dorabji Tata(1859-1933) carried out the bequest with
scrupulous zeal and distinction .Thus , even though it was Jamshedji Tata
who had envisioned the mammoth projects, it was in fact Dorabji Tata who
actually brought the ventures to existence and fruition. He was the first
chairman of the gigantic Tata enterprises.
It was in 1907 that the village of Sakchi was discovered at the confluence of two rivers, Subarnarekha and
Kharkhai and the railways station of Kalimati .The Tata Iron and Steel Company was floated.
SIR DORABJI TATA (1859 1933)
Sir DorabjiTata(1859-1933) carried out the bequest with scrupulous zeal
and distinction.
Thus , even though it was Jamshedji Tata who had envisioned the
mammoth projects, it was in fact Dorabji Tata who actually brought the
ventures to existence and fruition. He was the first chairman of the gigantic
Tata enterprises.
J.R.D.Tata has been one of the greatest builders and personalities of modern
India in the twentieth century.
He assumed Chairmanship of Tata Steel at the young age of 34, but his
charismatic, disciplined and forward looking leadership over the next 50 years
led the Tata Group to new height of achievement, expansion and
modernization.
His style of management was to pick the best person for the job at hand and let
him have the latitude to carry out the job. He was never interested for MicroManagement. It was he who zeroed in on Sumant Moolgaokar, the engineering
genius who successfully steered our company for many years. He was a visionary whose thinking was far
ahead of his time, which helped Tata Group launching its own Airlines, now known as Air India. He was
awarded the countrys highest civilian honor, The Bharat Ratna in 1992.
Board of Directors
Ratan N Tata
Chairman
H M Nerurkar
Managing Director
Subodh Bhargava
Andrew Robb
Ishaat Hussain
Additional Director
B Muthuraman
Vice Chairman
Nusli N Wadia
Jacobus Schraven
S M palia
Karl-Ulrich Koehler
Mallika Srinivasan
Additional Director
10
The Businessworld Most Respected Company Award 2011 in the Metals category.
Recognised as Indias Most Admired Knowledge Enterprise (MAKE) Award Winner 2010 at the
CII KM India Summit 2010.
Awarded Asia MAKE (Most Admired Knowledge Enterprise) Award 2010. This is the seventh
time that the Company was conferred with this honour.
Tata Steel Europe awarded the Lifecycle Analysis Leadership Award 2010.
Awarded Steel Industry Website of the Year 2010 by the World Steel Association.
Tata Steel won the following awards at Asias Best Employer Awards hosted by the Employer
Branding Institute in Singapore in July 2010: the Award for Talent Management, the Award for Best
HR Strategy in line with Business and the Award for Excellence in Training.
Tata Steel Processing and Distribution Limited won the JIPM Award for 2009, awarded by the
Japan Institute of Plant Management, for excellence in TPM in plant operations.
Awarded the Rashtriya Khel Protsahan Puruskar for the second consecutive year.
Recognised in six of the seven categories at the annual awards function organised by the Joint
Committee on Safety, Health and Environment in Steel Industry (JCSSI).
Awarded the CSR Excellence Award 2010 by ASSOCHAM, National CSR Committee and CSR
Organising Committee.
Awarded the Best Corporate Social Responsibility Practice at the 6th Social and Corporate
Governance Awards 2010 by the Bombay Stock Exchange.
NatSteel awarded the Platinum HEALTH Award 2010 by the Singapore Health Promotion Board.
NatSteel conferred with the Work-Life Excellence Award 2010 by the Singapore Ministry of
Manpower for the fourth consecutive time.
11
Jindal Steel
SAIL
Essar steel
Saw pipes
Uttam steel Ltd
Ispat industry Ltd
Mukand Ltd
Mahindra Ugine steel co. Ltd
Ushaispat Ltd
Kalyani steel Ltd
Electro steel casting Ltd
Sesa Goa Ltd
SWOT ANALYSIS
12
STRENGTH:
WEAKNESS:
OPPURTUNITY:
THREATS:
13
Working capital management deals with the management of these short term funds.
The constituents of current assets & current liabilities is as follows-
CURRENT ASSETS
CURRENT LIABILITIES
1. INVENTORY
a) RAW MATERIAL
b)WORK-IN-PROGRESS
c) FINISHED GOODS
d) OTHERS
2. TRADE CREDITORS
3. LOANS AND ADVANCES
1. SUNDRY CREDITORS
2. TRADE ADVANCES
3. BORROWINGS (short term)
a) COMMERCIAL BANKS
b) OTHERS
4. PROVISIONS
WORKING CAPITAL COMPRISES OF THE FOLLOWING:1. Cash and cash equivalents: - This most liquid form of working capital requires constant
supervision. A good cash budgeting and forecasting system provides answers to key questions such
as:
Is the cash level adequate to meet current expenses as they come due?
What is the timing relationship between cash inflow and outflow?
When would cash need occur?
When and how much bank borrowing will be needed to meet any cash shortfalls?
When will repayment be expected and will the cash flow cover it?
2. Accounts receivables: - Many businesses extend credit to their customers.
If you do, is the amount of accounts receivable reasonable relative to sales?
How rapidly are receivables being collected?
Which customers are slow to pay and what should be done about them?
3.
15
Is the inventory level reasonable compared with sales and the nature of your business?
What's the rate of inventory turnover compared with other companies in your type of business?
4. Accounts payable: - Financing by suppliers is common in small business; it is one of the major
sources of funds for entrepreneurs.
Is the amount of money owed suppliers reasonable relative to what you purchase?
What is your firm's payment policy doing to enhance or detract from your credit rating?
5. Accrued expenses and taxes payable: - These are obligations of your company at any given time
and represent a future outflow of cash.
16
1. Balance sheet or Traditional concept - It shows the position of the firm at certain point of time. It is
calculated in the basis of balance sheet prepared at a specific date. In this method there are two types of
working capital:a) Gross working capital - It refers to the firms investment in current assets. The sum of the current assets
is the working capital of the business. The sum of the current assets is a quantitative aspect of working
capital. Which emphasizes more on quantity than its quality, but it fails to reveal the true financial position
of the firm because every increase in current liabilities will decrease the gross working capital.
b) Net working capital - It is the difference between current assets and current liabilities or the excess of
total current assets over total current liabilities. It is also can defined as that part of a firms current assets
which is financed with long term funds. It may be either positive or negative. When the current assets
exceed the current liability, the working capital is positive and vice versa.
2. Operating cycle concept - The duration or time required to complete the sequence of events right from
purchase of raw material for cash to the realization of sales in cash is called the operating cycle or working
capital cycle
17
Sales
Operating cycle
Raw material
Finished goods
Work-in-progress
18
The investment in working capital is influenced by four key events in the production & sales cycle of the
firm:
Purchase of raw materials.
Payment of raw materials.
Sale of finished goods.
Collection of cash for sales.
The firm begins with the purchase of raw materials which are paid after a delay which represents the
accounts payable period. The raw materials are then converted into finished goods which are then sold.
The time lag between the purchase of raw materials and the sale of finished goods is called the inventory
period. The time lag between the date of sales & the date of collection of receivables is the accounts
receivable period. The time lag between purchase of raw materials & the collection of cash for sales is
referred to as operating cycle. The time lag between payment for raw material purchases & the collection
of cash for sales is referred to as cash cycle.
19
Distribution of Dividend:
If company is short of working capital, it cannot distribute the good dividend to its shareholders in
spite of sufficient profits. Profits are to be retained in the business to make up the deficiency of
working capital. On the other contrary, if working capital is sufficient, ample dividend can be
declared and distributed. It increases the market value of shares.
20
21
E v e r y b u s i n e s s c o n c e r n s h o u l d h a v e a d e q u a t e w o r k i n g c a p i t a l t o r u n i t s business
operations. It should have neither redundant or excessive working capital nor inadequate nor shortage
of working capital. Both excessive as well as short working capital positions are bad for any
business.
1. Excessive working capital means idle funds which earn no profits for the business and hence the business
cannot earn a proper rate of return on its investments.
2. When there is redundant working capital, it may lead to unnecessary purchasing and accumulation of
inventories causing more chances of theft waste and losses.
3. Excessive working capital implies excessive debtors and defective credit Policy which may cause higher
incidence of bad debts.
4. It may result into overall inefficiency in the organization.
5. When there is an excessive working capital relation with the banks and other financial institutions may
not be maintained.
6. Due to low rate of return on investments the value of shares may also fall
22
CURRENT ASSETS
STORES AND SPARE
PARTS
STOCK-IN-TRADE
SUNDRY DEBTORS
INTREST ACCRUED
AND INVESTMENTS
CASH AND BANK
LOANS AND
ADVANCES
TOTAL(A)
CURRENT
LIABILITIES
SUNDRY
CREDITORS
SUBSIDIARY
COMPANIES
INTEREST ACCRUED
BUT NOT DUE
ADVANCE
RECEIVED FROM
THE CUSTOMER
UNCLAIMED
MATURED
DEPOSITS(DUE)
INTEREST ACCRUED
ON UNPAID
DIVIDENDS AND
UNCLAIMED
MATURED
DIVIDENDS(DUE)
UNPAID DIVIDENDS
APPLICATION
MONEY PENDING
REFUND
UNPAID MATURED
DIVIDENDS
UNPAID MATURED
DEPOSITS
UNPAID MATURED
DEBENTURES
INTEREST ACCRUED
1827.54
631.63
0.20
2047.31
543.48
0.20
2868.28
635.98
0.00
2453.99
434.83
0.29
3237.58
428.03
0.00
455.41
3055.73
465.04
2452.78
1590.60
4330.43
3234.14
3628.28
4141.54
9553.19
6475.95
6066.28
10037.48
10375.29
18076.52
3145.99
3243.42
3842.78
4086.65
4721.07
102.61
115.74
1358.12
1514.30
1711.07
47.11
231.05
506.68
676.66
679.31
198.28
226.03
297.37
334.99
293.84
0.00
0.02
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.03
0.08
0.07
0.00
0.00
23.37
0.01
29.33
5.65
33.08
0.24
39.44
0.14
41.26
0.61
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.73
0.54
2.59
1.73
1.03
0.00
0.00
1.76
1.79
0.14
0.00
0.00
1.45
0.42
0.34
0.18
0.13
23
ON UNPAID
DIVIDENDS AND
MATURED
DIVIDENDS
PROVISION FOR
RETIRING
GRATUITIES
PROVISION FOR
EMPLOYEE
BENEFITS
PROVISION FOR
TAXATION
PROVISION FOR
FRINGE BENEFITS
PROPOSED
DIVIDEND
TOTAL(B)
NET WORKING
CAPITAL
49.31
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
470.19
848.54
1143.08
1127.50
1601.75
448.68
854.74
493.59
507.13
791.29
18.37
19.12
19.12
2.12
3.88
943.91
1278.40
1278.40
709.77
1151.06
5453.66
6768.78
8974.05
8999.61
10995.81
1022.29
(702.5)
1063.43
24
1375.68
7080.71
CURRENT
LIABILITIES
SUNDRY
CREDITORS
SUBSIDIARY
COMPANIES
INTEREST
ACCRUED BUT NOT
DUE
ADVANCE
RECEIVED FROM
THE CUSTOMER
PROVISION FOR
RETIRING
GRATUITIES
PROVISION FOR
EMPLOYEE
BENEFITS
PROVISION FOR
TAXATION
PROVISION FOR
FRINGE BENEFITS
PROPOSED
DIVIDEND
TOTAL(B)
PERCENTAGE
CHANGE OF NET
5.51
17.10
57.91
147.46
12.03
-13.96
2.11
-19.73
40.10
17.02
242.04
76.55
-14.44
-31.63
103.33
-16.21
31.93
-1.56
28.06
163.30
242.16
-9.22
385.49
42.98
236.54
24.15
3.10
18.48
6.35
15.52
64.52
12.80
1073.42
11.50
12.99
93.95
390.45
119.29
33.55
0.39
7.14
14.00
31.56
12.65
-12.28
5987.65
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
63.34
34.71
0.014
42.06
79.44
90.50
-42.25
2.74
56.03
675.11
4.08
0.00
-88.91
83.01
31.19
26.19
7.33
-44.48
62.17
6959.78
638.04
1232.01
-50.61
264.96
-6717.62
-647.26
-846.52
93.59
-28.42
25
WORKING
CAPITAL
(A-B)
FINANCIAL RATIOS
PARTICULARS
NET SALES
NET WORKING
CAPITAL
WORKING
CAPITAL
TUNRNOVER
RATIO
NET SALES
NET WORKING CAPITAL
2006-2007
17551.09
1022.29
17.17
-28.03
22.87
18.19
4.15
20 17.17
0
2006-1007
-20
-40
18.19
4.15
2007-2008
-28.03
2008-2009
INTERPRETATION:
26
2009-2010
2010-2011
The net working capital of TATA STEEL Ltd. has been fluctuating over the years. A sharp decrease in the
working capital in the year 2007-2008, where the working capital was negative was mainly because of a
decrease in current assets.
As compared to the year 2009-2010 where the working capital ratio was 18.19, the ratio this year has fallen
down to 4.15. The reason for decrease can be accredited to the increase in the current assets such as
inventory, cash & bank balances and loans and advances that has increased tremendously this year. There
has been an increase in the sales and the production capacity this year. The raw materials consumption has
also increased by 13.64%.
2. CURRENT RATIO
The current ratio is used to evaluate a companys overall short term liquidity position. It
tells us whether a company is in a position to meet its obligations.
FORMULA = CURRENT ASSETS
CURRENT LIABILITIES
PARTICULARS
CURRENT
ASSESTS
CURRENT
LIABILITIES
CURRENT RATIO
2006-2007
6475.95
2007-2008
6066.28
2008-2009
10037.48
2009-2010
10375.29
2010-1011
18076.52
5453.66
6768.78
8974.05
8999.61
10995.81
1.19
0.90
1.12
1.15
1.64
current ratio
1.8
1.64
1.6
1.4
1.2 1.19
1.15
1.12
1
0.9
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0
2006-2007 2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011
27
current ratio
INTERPRETATION:
The ideal current ratio is considered to be 2:1. The current ratio has been increasing steadily over the years.
As compared to the previous year in 2009-2010 the ratio has increased to 1.64 in the year 2010-2011. The
reason for increase might be continuous investments in the current assets over the years.
3. QUICK RATIO
Quick ratio / Liquid ratio is an indicator of a companys short term solvency or liquidity
position. It is the relationship between liquid assets and liabilities. An asset is said to be liquid if it can be
converted into cash within a short period without loss of value.
FORMULA = CURRENT ASSETS INVENTORY
CURRENT LIABILITIES
PARTICULARS
CURRENT
ASSETS
INVENTORY
CURRENT
ASSETSINVENTORY
CURRENT
LIABILTY
QUICK RATIO
2006-2007
6475.95
2007-2008
6066.28
2008-2009
10037.48
2009-2010
10375.29
2010-2011
18076.52
1827.54
4648.41
2047.31
4018.97
2868.28
7169.2
2453.99
7921.3
3237.58
14838.94
5453.66
6768.78
8957.05
8999.61
10995.81
0.85
0.59
0.80
0.88
1.34
QUICK RATIO
1.34
0.88
20
11
QUICK RATIO
20
10
-
20
10
0.8
20
09
-
20
09
0.59
20
08
-
20
08
20
07
-
20
06
-
20
07
1.6
1.4
1.2
1
0.8 0.85
0.6
0.4
0.2
0
INTERPRETATION:
28
The ideal standard in case of quick ratio is 1:1. And if it is more it is considered to be better. The idea behind
this is that for every rupee of current liabilities, there should be at least one rupee of liquid asset.
Quick ratio is thus a rigorous test of liquidity and gives a better picture of short term financial position of
the firm. As shown in the graph above, we can see that after a steep fall in the quick ratio from the year
2006-2007 to 2007-2008 there has been a steady increase in the quick ratio and for the year 2010-2011 the
ratio is 1.34 which signifies that the liquidity position of the firm has improved and this is because of
increase in the cash that is lying with the firm.
PARTICULARS
AVERAGE
DEBTORS
NET SALES
DEBTORS
TURNOVER
RATIO
2006-2007
585.515
2007-2008
587.55
2008-2009
589.73
2009-2010
535.40
2010-2011
431.43
17551.09
29.98
19693.28
33.52
24315.77
41.23
25021.98
46.73
29396.35
68.13
20
11
20
10
-
20
10
20
09
-
20
09
20
08
-
46.73
41.23
33.52
20
08
20
07
-
20
06
-
20
07
80
70
60
50
40
30 29.98
20
10
0
29
DEBTORS TURNOVER
RATIO
INTERPRETATION:
Debtors turnover ratio indicates the speed with which the amount is being collected from the debtors.
The higher the ratio the better it is, since it indicates the amount from the debtors is being collected more
quickly. The more quickly the debtors pay, the less risk from bad debts, and so lower is the expenses of
collection and increase in the liquidity of the firm. By comparing the debtors turnover ratio of the current
year with the previous year, it may be assessed whether the sales policy of the management is efficient or
not.
As shown in the graph above, there has been an increase in the ratio from 2006-2007 to
2010-2011from 29.98 to 68.13 which shows that the sales management of the firm is quite efficient.
30
PARTICULAR
S
DEBTORS
TURNOVER
RATIO
NO. OF DAYS
DEBT
COLLECTION
PERIOD
2006-2007
2007-2008
2008-2009
2009-2010
2010-2011
29.98
33.52
41.23
46.73
68.13
365
12
365
11
365
9
365
8
365
5
31
DEBT COLLECTION
PERIOD
20
11
20
10
-
20
10
20
09
-
20
08
-
20
08
11
20
07
-
20
06
-
20
07
12
20
09
12
10
8
6
4
2
0
INTERPRETATION:
Debt collection period means the average number of days that the debtors take to get converted to cash. In
other words, credit sales are locked up in debtors for the number of days.
As we can see here, the debt collection period has come down from 12 days to 5 days which means that
the debtors get converted to cash in 5 days. An increase in the ratio indicates excessive blockage of funds
with the debtors which increases the chances of bad debts. In this case as we can see that there is a decrease
in the average collection period which indicates prompt payment by debtors which reduces the chances of
bad debts.
Therefore, from the above data it can be concluded that the company is in a better position and is
improving as compared to its previous years.
32
2006-2007
10174.97
2007-2008
11155.5
2008-2009
14928.65
2009-2010
15730.67
2010-2011
17471.83
1779.82
1937.43
2457.8
2661.14
2845.78
5.72
5.76
6.07
5.91
6.13
33
6.13
6.07
5.91
5.9
5.8
5.7 5.72
5.76
5.6
20
11
20
10
-
20
10
20
09
-
20
09
20
08
-
20
08
20
07
-
20
06
-
20
07
5.5
INTERPRETATION:
This ratio indicates the relationship between the cost of goods sold during the year and average stock kept
during that year. The ratio indicates whether the stock has been efficiently used or not. It shows the speed
with which the stock is turned into sales during the year.
The graph above shows that after an increase in the ratio from the year 2007-2008 to 2008-2009 (5.76-6.07)
there in the year 2009-2010(5.91) after which again a rise in the ratio in the year 2010-2011(6.13). A high
ratio is indicative that the stock is selling quickly.
34
2006-2007
2263.01
2840.01
3194.70
3543.10
3964.72
4383.86
0.79
0.73
1.76
1.31
1.56
35
20
11
PAYABLES
TURNOVER RATIO
20
10
-
20
10
1.56
20
09
-
20
09
20
08
-
20
08
1.31
1.76
0.73
20
07
-
20
06
-
20
07
2
1.5
10.79
0.5
0
INTERPRETATION:
The ratio indicates the speed with which the amount is being paid to the creditors. A higher ratio is better
since it would indicate that the creditors are being paid more quickly and this increases the credit worthiness
of the firm.
Here, the graph above shows a steep fall in the ratio from the year 2008-2009(1.76) to 2009-2010(1.31) and
then again a rise to the year 2010-2011(1.56). The reason for the fall can be attributed to a decrease in the
net credit purchases in the year 2009-2010.
COMPARITIVE
ANALYSIS OF
TATA STEEL,
SAIL
36
&
JSW
SAIL
Steel Authority of India Limited (SAIL) is the leading steel-making company in India. It is a fully
integrated iron and steel maker, producing both basic and special steels for domestic construction,
engineering, power, railway, automotive and defence industries and for sale in export markets. SAIL is
also among the five Maharatnas of the country's Central Public Sector Enterprises.
37
SAIL manufactures and sells a broad range of steel products, including hot and cold rolled sheets and
coils, galvanised sheets, electrical sheets, structural, railway products, plates, bars and rods, stainless steel
and other alloy steels. SAIL produces iron and steel at five integrated plants and three special steel plants,
located principally in the eastern and central regions of India and situated close to domestic sources of
raw materials, including the Company's iron ore, limestone and dolomite mines. The company has the
distinction of being Indias second largest producer of iron ore and of having the countrys second largest
mines network. This gives SAIL a competitive edge in terms
of captive availability of iron ore, limestone, and dolomite
which are inputs for steel making.
SAIL's wide range of long and flat steel products are much in
demand in the domestic as well as the international market.
This vital responsibility is carried out by SAIL's own Central
Marketing Organisation (CMO) that transacts business
through its network of 37 Branch Sales Offices spread across
the four regions, 25 Departmental Warehouses, 42
Consignment Agents and 27 Customer Contact Offices.
CMOs domestic marketing effort is supplemented by its ever
widening network of rural dealers who meet the demands of
the smallest customers in the remotest corners of the country. With the total number of dealers over 2000 ,
SAIL's wide marketing spread ensures availability of quality steel in virtually all the districts of the
country.
SAIL's International Trade Division ( ITD), in New Delhi- an ISO 9001:2000 accredited unit of CMO,
undertakes exports of Mild Steel products and Pig Iron from SAILs five integrated steel plants.
With technical and managerial expertise and know-how in steel making gained over four decades, SAIL's
Consultancy Division (SAILCON) at New Delhi offers services and consultancy to clients world-wide.
SAIL has a well-equipped Research and Development Centre for Iron and Steel (RDCIS) at Ranchi which
helps to produce quality steel and develop new technologies for the steel industry. Besides, SAIL has its
own in-house Centre for Engineering and Technology (CET), Management Training Institute (MTI) and
Safety Organisation at Ranchi. Our captive mines are under the control of the Raw Materials Division in
Kolkata. The Environment Management Division and Growth Division of SAIL operate from their
headquarters in Kolkata. Almost all our plants and major units are ISO Certified.
The Precursor
38
SAIL traces its origin to the formative years of an emerging nation - India. After independence the builders
of modern India worked with a vision - to lay the infrastructure for rapid industrialisaton of the country. The
steel sector was to propel the economic growth. Hindustan Steel Private Limited was set up on January 19,
1954.
Expanding Horizon (1959-1973)
Hindustan Steel (HSL) was initially designed to manage only one plant that was coming up at Rourkela. For
Bhilai and Durgapur Steel Plants, the preliminary work was done by the Iron and Steel Ministry. From April
1957, the supervision and control of these two steel plants were also transferred to Hindustan Steel. The
registered office was originally in New Delhi. It moved to Calcutta in July 1956, and ultimately to Ranchi in
December 1959.
The 1 MT phases of Bhilai and Rourkela Steel Plants were completed by the end of December 1961. The 1
MT phase of Durgapur Steel Plant was completed in January 1962 after commissioning of the Wheel and
Axle plant. The crude steel production of HSL went up from .158 MT (1959-60) to 1.6 MT. A new steel
company, Bokaro Steel Limited, was incorporated in January 1964 to construct and operate the steel plant at
Bokaro.The second phase of Bhilai Steel Plant was completed in September 1967 after commissioning of
the Wire Rod Mill. The last unit of the 1.8 MT phase of Rourkela - the Tandem Mill - was commissioned in
February 1968, and the 1.6 MT stage of Durgapur Steel Plant was completed in August 1969 after
commissioning of the Furnace in SMS. Thus, with the completion of the 2.5 MT stage at Bhilai, 1.8 MT at
Rourkela and 1.6 MT at Durgapur, the total crude steel production capacity of HSL was raised to 3.7 MT in
1968-69 and subsequently to 4MT in 1972-73.
Holding Company
The Ministry of Steel and Mines drafted a policy statement to evolve a new model for managing industry.
The policy statement was presented to the Parliament on December 2, 1972. On this basis the concept of
creating a holding company to manage inputs and outputs under one umbrella was mooted. This led to the
formation of Steel Authority of India Ltd. The company, incorporated on January 24, 1973 with an
authorized capital of Rs. 2000 crore, was made responsible for managing five integrated steel plants at
Bhilai, Bokaro, Durgapur, Rourkela and Burnpur, the Alloy Steel Plant and the Salem Steel Plant. In 1978
SAIL was restructured as an operating company.
Since its inception, SAIL has been instrumental in laying a sound infrastructure for the industrial
development of the country. Besides, it has immensely contributed to the development of technical and
managerial expertise. It has triggered the secondary and tertiary waves of economic growth by continuously
providing the inputs for the consuming industry.
39
JSW
JSW Group is one of the fastest growing business conglomerates with a strong presence in the core
economic sector. This Sajjan Jindal led enterprise has grown from a steel rolling mill in 1982 to a multi
business conglomerate worth US $ 9 billion within a short span of time.
As part of the US $ 15 billion O. P. Jindal Group, JSW Group has diversified interests in Steel, Energy,
Minerals and Mining, Aluminium, Infrastructure and Logistics, Cement and Information Technology.
On its road to growth and expansion, the Group is also conscious about its responsibility towards
environment and social development. Eco-efficiency is a matter of principle. Preventive measures for
damage to the environment are taken into account at the planning stage of production and growth.
JSW Foundation, an integral part of the Group, is the CSR wing, with a vision to create
socio economic difference in the fields of Education, Health and Sports, Community
Relationship/Propagation as well as Art, Culture and Heritage.
JSW Foundation plans and implements social development activities of the JSW group of companies. It is an
independent institution and is governed by a Board of Trustees who is drawn from the senior management of
the JSW group of companies. The Foundation is headed by Mrs Sangita Jindal while the executive is headed
by Shri Jugal Tandon in his capacity as CEO, Corporate Sustainability. A team of social development
professionals is based in Mumbai and at every location where JSW has its operations and undertake
community based activity in consultation with their respective managements. An Advisory Board
comprising of eminent NGO leaders has been constituted recently to render advice on social processes and
participatory planning and execution of projects.
A social development policy has been accepted by the group. JSW cherishes people and believes in inclusive
growth to facilitate creation of a value based and empowered society through continuous and purposeful
engagement of all stakeholders. In partnership with external development agencies, JSW would strive
toachieve sustainable development in all spheres of life including integrated community development,
promotion of arts and culture, environment protection and sports .
As a responsible corporate, JSW would integrate its environment, HR and ethical business policies with
appropriate community engagement and gender equity. JSW is committed to allocation of 1.5% of its PAT to
pursue its CSR policy. In tune with this, JSW Foundation works closely with village communities and
creates synergies with other verticals of the JSW group to assimilate their intervention in a social
development framework.
40
FORMULA =
PARTICULARS
TATA STEEL
SAIL
JINDAL
2006-2007
17.17
3.63
42.79
NET SALES
NET WORKING CAPITAL
2007-2008
-28.03
3.01
-10.49
2008-2009
22.87
2.48
-4.78
2009-2010
18.19
1.85
-8.82
2010-2011
4.15
2.06
187.34
200
150
100
TATA STEEL
SAIL
50
JINDAL
20
11
20
10
-
20
10
20
09
-
20
08
20
09
20
08
-
20
06
-
-50
20
07
-
20
07
INTERPRETATION:
The working capital ratio of TATA STEEL has been fluctuating over the years. The reason for negative
working capital for the year 2007-2008 can be attributed to the decrease in current assets whereas a sharp
decrease in working capital for the year 2010-2011 is because of the increase in current assets such as cash
and bank balances, loans and advances and also because of an increase in the raw material consumption.
The working capital ratio of SAIL Ltd. has been falling constantly from the year 2006-2007
to the year 2009-2010 after which there was an increase in the ratio.
The working capital of JSW has shown a sharp decrease from the year 2006-2007 to 20072008 where the working capital ratio remained constantly negative for three consecutive years and after that
there was an increase in the ratio. The reason for the increase in the ratio is an increase in the current assets,
loans and advances.
41
2. CURRENT RATIO
The current ratio is used to evaluate a companys overall short term liquidity position. It
tells us whether a company is in a position to meet its obligations.
2006-2007
1.19
1.86
1.08
2007-2008
0.90
1.99
0.74
2008-2009
1.12
2.02
0.61
2009-2010
1.15
1.78
0.73
2010-2011
1.64
1.84
1.01
2.5
2
1.5
1
2.02
1.99
1.19
1.08
0.5
1.15
1.12
0.9
0.74
1.84
1.64
1.78
1.64
1.01
SAIL
0.73
0.61
TATA STEEL
JINDAL
20
11
20
10
-
20
10
20
09
-
20
09
20
08
-
20
08
20
07
-
20
06
-
20
07
INTERPRETATION:
The current ratio of TATA STEEL has been rising from the year 2007-2008and it has shown a positive
graph. The reason for the constantly rising graph since 2007-2008 has been investment in the current assets,
i.e. inventories, debtors, loans and advances and the liquid cash and bank balances.
SAIL has a fluctuating current ratio over the years with various rises and falls over the
time. The reason for the fall in the ratio from the year 2008-2009 to the year 2009-2010 was the decrease in
the current assets.
JSW had witnessed a steep downfall till the year 2008-2009 after which there was a
rise in the ratio till 2010-2011. The reason for decrease in the ratio from the year 2007-2008 to the year
2008-2009 was because of the increase in current liabilities and again a rise in the year 2009-2010 was
because of the increase in the current assets.
Current ratio should therefore be maintained around its ideal standard and for
achieving this the companys should therefore maintain its current assets and current liabilities in the right
proportion.
42
3. QUICK RATIO
Quick ratio OR Liquid ratio is an indicator of a companys short term solvency or
liquidity position. It is the relationship between liquid assets and liabilities. An asset is said to be liquid if it
can be converted into cash within a short period without loss of value.
FORMULA = CURRENT ASSETS INVENTORY
CURRENT LIABILITIES
PARTICULARS
TATA STEEL
SAIL
JINDAL
2006-2007
0.85
1.25
0.64
2007-2008
0.59
1.47
0.36
2008-2009
0.80
1.42
0.34
2009-2010
0.88
1.37
0.39
2010-2011
1.34
1.29
0.60
3
2.5
2.4
2
1.5
1
0.5
1.47
0.85
0.64
0.59
0.36
TATA STEEL
1.42
1.37
0.8
0.88
0.34
0.39
1.29 SAIL
1.34
JINDAL
0.6
0
2006-2007 2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010
INTERPRETATION:
The quick ratio of TATA STEEL has been rising since 2007-2008 and the investments should be made
enough in the current assets so as to maintain the ratio of current assets and current liabilities as 1:1.
The quick ratio of SAIL had declined from 2006-2007(2.4) to 2007-2008(1.47) and
thereafter the ratio has been declining throughout but the company has maintained the ratio above the ideal
standard.
The ratio of JSW had fallen from the year 2007-2008(0.36) to 2008-2009(0.34) negligibly
and thereafter it rose to 0.39 in 2008-2009 and finally to 0.60 in 2010-2011. The reason for the increase in
the ratio in 2010-2011 was increase in the cash and bank balances maintained with the company.
43
PARTICULARS
TATA STEEL
SAIL
JINDAL
2006-2007
29.98
16.31
-
2007-2008
33.52
14.73
33.83
2009-2010
46.73
12.44
37.87
2010-2011
68.13
11.16
33.05
68.13
TATA STEEL
SAIL
JSW
20
11
11.16
20
10
-
20
10
20
09
-
20
09
20
08
-
20
08
20
07
-
20
06
-
20
07
80
70
60
50
46.73
41.23
40
33.52
30 29.98 38.07
33.8
33.05
20 16.31
14.73
14.21
12.44
10
0
7.87
2008-2009
41.23
14.21
38.07
INTERPRETATION:
The debtors turnover ratio has shown a positive rising graph throughout which is very good for the company
since it shows the speed with which the money is being recovered from the debtors. And rising graph
throughout shows that the sales management is quite efficient in recovering the money from the debtors.
SAIL has a declining graph throughout which is not a good sign and therefore it
means that credit sales have been made to the debtors who do not deserve so much of credit and therefore
the company must revise its sales policy.
44
JSW has a fluctuating graph and after a steep fall in the year 2009-2010 the ratio
rose to 33.5 in the year 2010-2011. The debtors and the sales figures have risen for the year 2010-2011 and
the reason for the rise in the ratio can be efficient sales management and a sound sales policy.
PARTICULARS
TATA STEEL
SAIL
JINDAL
2006-2007
12
22
2007-2008
11
24
10
2008-2009
9
26
9
2009-2010
8
29
9
2010-2011
5
33
11
35
30
25
20
15
TATA STEEL
10
SAIL
JSW
20
10
20
09
-
20
09
20
08
-
20
08
20
07
-
20
07
20
06
-
20
05
-
20
06
INTERPRETATION:
The lower the debt collection period the lesser the chances of bad debts and thus is better for the firm. TATA
STEEL has a sound sale policy and the average collection period has been decreasing over the years and
finally the debtors are converted to cash in 5 days as in the year 2010-2011 and lesser is the collection period
shorter is the operating cycle.
SAILs average collection period has been increasing in the number of days which means
that they have a liberal sales policy and the credit period is thus extended for the debtors. A higher debt
45
collection period generally increases the chances of bad debts and reduces the chances of recovery of money
from the debtors.
JSW has maintained its collection period at more or less a constant platform. The debtors
are converted to cash in 11 days (2010-2011). Here we can conclude that TATA STEEL is in a better position
as compared to the other two firms. SAIL should make some serious efforts to reduce its debt collection
period
2006-2007
5.72
4.22
7
5.72
6
55.87
4 4.22
2007-2008
5.76
4.68
5.87
6.07
5.89
5.76
4.68
3
2
1
0
5.29
3.62
4.09
TATA STEEL
SAIL
20
11
20
10
-
20
10
20
09
-
20
09
20
08
-
20
07
-
20
08
JSW
20
07
20
06
-
2009-2010
5.91
3.62
5.74
6.13
5.91
5.74
4.68
2008-2009
6.07
4.68
5.89
INTERPRETATION:
46
2010-2011
6.13
4.09
5.29
The stock turnover ratio of TATA STEEL has been rising throughout and the cost of goods sold has also
been rising with a rise in the average stock maintained with the company. A higher stock ratio turnover is
indicative that the stock is selling quickly, that is reflected with the higher sales.
SAIL has fluctuating ratio throughout.
JSW has a declining ratio, though the cost of goods sold and the average debtors has
been rising but certain items which have to be excluded from the cost of goods sold have been rising over
the time.
PARTICULARS
TATA STEEL
SAIL
JINDAL
2006-2007
0.79
5.46
2007-2008
0.73
5.21
7.17
47
2008-2009
1.76
6.14
6.28
2009-2010
1.31
3.13
6.51
2010-2011
1.56
3.82
8.57
8.57
9
87.17
7
6
5
6.28
6.51
6.14
5.46
5.21
TATA STEEL
3.82
3.13
3
2
1
1.76
0.79
1.31
SAIL
JSW
1.56
0.73
0
2006-2007 2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011
INTERPRETATION:
The payables turnover ratio means the speed with which the creditors are being paid. TATA STEEL has a
rising graph which indicates that the creditors of the firm are being paid on time and quite frequently and
this helps in increasing the credit worthiness of the firm.
SAIL has had a fall in the ratio drastically from the year 2008-2009 to the year
2009-2010.
JSW is quite efficient in paying off its creditors. A ratio of 8.57 times mans that the speed
with which the company pays to its creditors is quite high.
48
RATIO ANALYSIS
Ratios can be found out by dividing one number by another number. Ratios show how one number is related
to another. It may be expressed in the form of co-efficient, percentage, proportion, or rate. For example the
current assets and current liabilities of a business on a particular date are $200,000 and $100,000
respectively. The ratio of current assets and current liabilities could be expressed as 2 (i.e. 200,000 /
100,000) or 200 percent or it can be expressed as 2:1 i.e., the current assets are two times the current
liabilities. Ratio sometimes is expressed in the form of rate. For instance, the ratio between two numerical
facts, usually over a period of time, e.g. stock turnover is three times a year.
49
(B)
Functional Classification or
Classification According to Tests
(C)
Significance Ratios or Ratios
According to Importance
Profitability ratios
Primary ratios
Liquidity ratios
Secondary ratios
Activity ratios
Composite/mixed ratios
or inter statement ratios
Ratios are based only on the information which has been recorded in the financial
statements. Financial statements themselves are subject to several limitations. Thus ratios derived,
there from, are also subject to those limitations. For example, non-financial changes though
important for the business are not relevant by the financial statements. Financial statements are
affected to a very great extent by accounting conventions and concepts. Personal judgment plays a
great part in determining the figures for financial statements.
2. Comparative study required: Ratios are useful in judging the efficiency of the business only when
they are compared with past results of the business. However, such a comparison only provide
glimpse of the past performance and forecasts for future may not prove correct since several other
factors like market conditions, management policies, etc. may affect the future operations.
3. Ratios alone are not adequate: Ratios are only indicators, they cannot be taken as final regarding
good or bad financial position of the business. Other things have also to be seen.
4. Problems of price level changes: A change in price level can affect the validity of ratios calculated
for different time periods. In such a case the ratio analysis may not clearly indicate the trend in
solvency and profitability of the company. The financial statements, therefore, be adjusted keeping in
view the price level changes if a meaningful comparison is to be made through accounting ratios.
5. Lack of adequate standard: No fixed standard can be laid down for ideal ratios. There are no well
accepted standards or rule of thumb for all ratios which can be accepted as norm. It renders
interpretation of the ratios difficult.
6. Limited use of single ratios: A single ratio, usually, does not convey much of a sense. To make a
better interpretation, a number of ratios have to be calculated which is likely to confuse the analyst
than help him in making any good decision.
7. Personal bias: Ratios are only means of financial analysis and not an end in itself. Ratios have to
interpreted and different people may interpret the same ratio in different way.
8. Incomparable: Not only industries differ in their nature, but also the firms of the similar business
widely differ in their size and accounting procedures etc. It makes comparison of ratios difficult and
misleading.
FINANCIAL RATIOS
1. NET DEBT TO EQUITY
Debt is the borrowed funds and Equity is the owned funds of an organization. This ratio is calculated to
measure the extent to which debt financing has been used in a business. A ratio of 1:1 is considered to be
satisfactory. This ratio is also known as External-Internal ratio as it indicates the relationship between the
external equities or the outsiders funds and the internal equities or the shareholders funds.
FORMULA =
NET DEBT
SHAREHOLDERS FUND
51
NET DEBT= SECURED LOANS+ UNSECURED LOANS- CASH AND BANK BALANCECURRENT INVESTMENTS
EQUITY= SHAREHOLDERS FUND- MISCELLANOUS EXPENSES
FINANCIAL YEAR 2006-2007
COMPANY
NET DEBT
(1728.55)
SHAREHOLDERS
FUND
15108.68
DEBT- EQUITY
RATIO
(0.12)
TATA STEEL
SAIL
JSW
(5454.57)
3642.29
17184
5788.92
(0.32)
0.63
NET DEBT
TATA STEEL
SAIL
JSW
16519.85
(10737.77)
6283.78
SHAREHOLDERS
FUND
27455.84
23004.09
7677.25
DEBT- EQUITY
RATIO
0.61
(0.47)
0.82
SHAREHOLDERS
FUND
30281.33
0.79841
7959.25
DEBT-EQUITY
RATIO
0.73
(0.38)
1.21
SHAREHOLDERS
FUND
36961.80
33316.70
9706.34
DEBT- EQUITY
RATIO
0.55
(0.18)
0.98
SHAREHOLDERS
FUND
46944.63
37069.47
17225.27
DEBT-EQUITY
RATIO
0.45
0.07
0.35
NET DEBT
TATA STEEL
SAIL
JSW
22086.25
(10714.20)
9602.56
NET DEBT
TATA STEEL
SAIL
JSW
20285.83
(5925.12)
9529.64
NET DEBT
TATA STEEL
SAIL
JSW
21159.81
2638.56
5965.65
52
1.4
1.21
1.2
0.98
0.82
0.8
0.63
0.6
0.4
0.61
TATA STEEL
0.73
0.55
SAIL
0.2
0.45
0.35
JSW
0.07
0
-0.2
-0.4
2006-2007
-0.12
2007-2008
2009-2010
2010-2011
-0.18
-0.32
-0.6
2008-2009
-0.47
-0.38
INTERPRETATION:
The debt-equity ratio is calculated to assess the firms ability to meet its long term liabilities. Generally, a
ratio of 2:1 is considered to be safe for the long term lenders and a ratio below 2:1 provides sufficient
protection to the long term lenders and thus they are more secure and a higher ratio thus would indicate a
more risky financial position of the firm.
The debt- equity ratio for all the year and of all the three companies has been less than 2:1 and
this is indicative of a sound financial position of the firm.
SHAREHOLDERS
EQUITY
TATA STEEL
SAIL
JSW
580.67
4130.40
525.80
TOTAL
ASSETS(TANGIBLE
)
25597.50
22906.33
10779.74
SHAREHOLDERS
EQUITY RATIO
TOTAL
ASSETS(TANGIBLE
)
47075.52
27677.41
16475.62
SHAREHOLDERS
EQUITY RATIO
TOTAL
ASSETS(TANGIBLE
)
58741.77
36855.04
20653.04
SHAREHOLDERS
EQUITY RATIO
TOTAL
ASSETS(TANGIBLE
)
64232.78
51242.87
23256.39
SHAREHOLDERS
EQUITY RATIO
TOTAL
ASSETS(TANGIBLE
)
78555.91
SHAREHOLDERS
EQUITY RATIO
0.023
0.18
0.049
SHAREHOLDERS
EQUITY
TATA STEEL
SAIL
JSW
6203.30
4130.40
537.01
0.132
0.15
0.032
SHAREHOLDERS
EQUITY
TATA STEEL
SAIL
JSW
6203.45
4130.40
537.01
0.11
0.11
0.03
SHAREHOLDERS
EQUITY
TATA STEEL
SAIL
JSW
887.41
4130.40
527.11
0.014
0.08
0.023
SHAREHOLDERS
EQUITY
TATA STEEL
959.41
54
0.012
SAIL
JSW
4130.40
563.18
58726.03
31493.65
0.07
0.018
0.2
0.18
0.18
0.16
0.15
0.14
0.13
0.12
0.11
0.11
TATA STEEL
0.1
SAIL
0.08
0.08
0.07
0.06
JSW
0.05
0.04
0.03
0.02
0.03
0.02
0.01
0.02
0.01
0.02
0
2006-2007
2007-2008
2008-2009
2009-2010
2010-2011
INTERPRETATION:
A ratio used to help determine how much shareholders would receive in the event of a company-wide
liquidation. The ratio is calculated by dividing total shareholders' equity by total assets of the firm, and it
represents the amount of assets on which shareholders have a residual claim.
If we consider as in the case of TATA STEEL, the ratio for the year 2006-2007 is 0.023
so this means that the shareholders would have a claim of 2.3% on the assets in the event of the wind up of
the company.
The lower the ratio, the better it is for the company since the company would be then
able to pay off to its shareholders in case of liquidation without any burden.
TATA STEEL has made efforts to lower the ratio and finally succeeded to do so. If we
consider the ratios for the year 2010-2011, we can see that TATA ATEEL is in a better position than the other
two companies.
55
3. DEBT TO NET WORTH RATIO - The net debt to net worth ratio has significance to lenders, analysts
and business managers. If affects the ability of a company to borrow money and to finance its growth. A
business owner needs to know the optimal debt to net worth ratio for the benefit of its company. The net
debt should never be higher than the net worth; it is a bad sign for the company.
FORMULA = LONG TERM DEBT
NET WORTH
LONG TERM DEBT = SECURED LOANS + UNSECURED LOANS CASH & BANK
CURRENT INVESTMENTS
NET WORTH= EQUITY SHARE CAPITAL + PREFERENCE SHARE CAPITAL+ RESERVES &
SURPLUS MISCELLANOUS EXPENSES TO THE EXTENT NOT WRITTEN OFF.
FINANCIAL YEAR 2006-2007
COMPANY
TATA STEEL
SAIL
JSW
LONG TERM
DEBT
(1728.55)
(5454.57)
3642.29
NET WORTH
13893.62
17184
5399.18
DEBT- NET
WORTH RATIO
(0.125)
(0.32)
0.67
LONG TERM
DEBT
16519.85
(10737.77)
6283.78
NET WORTH
27145.62
23004.09
7677.25
DEBT- NET
WORTH RATIO
0.61
(0.47)
0.82
LONG TERM
DEBT
22086.25
(10714.20)
9602.56
NET WORTH
30071.19
27984.10
7959.25
DEBT- NET
WORTH RATIO
0.73
(0.38)
1.21
LONG TERM
DEBT
20285.83
(5925.12)
9529.64
NET WORTH
36961.80
33316.70
9706.34
DEBT- NET
WORTH RATIO
0.55
(0.18)
0.98
NET WORTH
DEBT- NET
LONG TERM
56
DEBT
21159.81
2638.56
5965.65
TATA STEEL
SAIL
JSW
WORTH RATIO
0.45
0.07
0.36
46944.63
37069.47
16695.89
1.4
1.21
1.2
0.98
1
0.8
0.82
0.67
0.6
0.73
0.61
0.55
0.45
TATA S TEEL
0.36
0.4
S AIL
JS W
0.2
0.07
0
-0.2
2006-2007
-0.13
-0.4
-0.32
-0.6
2007-2008
2008-2009
2009-2010
2010-2011
-0.18
-0.38
-0.47
INTERPRETATION:
This ratio is used in the analysis of financial statements to show the amount of protection available to
creditors. A high ratio usually indicates that the business has a lot of risk because it must meet
principal and interest on its obligations.
TATA STEEL has a fluctuating ratio throughout the five years. But anyhow it has tried to
maintain its position by reducing the debts and increasing the net worth of the company.
SAIL has a negative ratio but in the year 2010-2011 it has finally achieved a positive ratio.
JSW has a fluctuating graph throughout the five years but in the year 2010-2011, it has been
able to lower the ratio and thus reduce the risk involved in the business.
57
4. FIXED ASSETS TO LONG TERM RATIO - This ratio indicates the proportion of long-term funds
deployed in fixed assets. The higher the ratio, the safer will be the funds available in case of liquidation.
It also indicates the proportion of funds that is invested in working capital.
It indicates the level of fixed assets owned by a company in relation to the long-term debts of the
company. The higher the ratio the better it is for a company and the assets which are debt free and
fully owned by the company.
FORMULA =
FIXED ASSETS
LONG TERM LOANS
FIXED ASSETS
LONG TERM
FUNDS
TATA STEEL
SAIL
JSW
11040.56
11597.71
8189.10
23594.42
21493.67
9767.08
FIXED ASSTES TO
LONG TERM
RATIO
0.47
0.54
0.84
FIXED ASSETS
LONG TERM
FUNDS
TATA STEEL
SAIL
JSW
12623.56
11571.31
10955.49
45322.42
26108.81
15223.78
FIXED ASSTES TO
LONG TERM
RATIO
0.28
0.44
0.72
FIXED ASSETS
LONG TERM
FUNDS
TATA STEEL
SAIL
JSW
14482.22
12268.83
13086.44
57122.44
35522.89
19231.88
FIXED ASSTES TO
LONG TERM
RATIO
0.25
0.35
0.68
FIXED ASSETS
TATA STEEL
SAIL
16006.03
13615.28
LONG TERM
FUNDS
62201
49827.95
58
FIXED ASSTES TO
LONG TERM
RATIO
0.26
0.27
JSW
16866.14
21291.44
0.79
FIXED ASSTES TO
LONG TERM
RATIO
0.25
0.26
0.74
FIXED ASSETS
LONG TERM
FUNDS
TATA STEEL
SAIL
JSW
18774.48
15082.66
21102.15
75067.57
57234.96
28647.23
0.9
0.84
0.79
0.8
0.74
0.72
0.68
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.54
0.47
TATA STEEL
0.44
0.4
SAIL
0.35
0.28
0.3
0.25
0.27
0.26
0.26
0.25
2008-2009
2009-2010
2010-2011
JSW
0.2
0.1
0
2006-2007
2007-2008
INTERPRETATION:
This is a difficult set of ratios to interpret as asset values are based on the historical cost. An increase
in the fixed asset figure may result from the replacement of an asset at an increased price or the
purchase of an additional asset intended to increase the production capacity.
A latter transaction might be expected to result in increased sales.
59
5. PROPERITARY RATIO - This ratio indicates the proportion of long-term funds deployed in fixed
assets. The higher the ratio, the safer will be the funds available in case of liquidation. It also indicates
the proportion of funds that is invested in working capital.
It indicates the level of fixed assets owned by a company in relation to the long-term debts of the
company. The higher the ratio the better it is for a company and the assets which are debt free and
fully owned by the company.
FORMULA =
NET WORTH
TOTAL ASSETS
NET WORTH = EQUITY SHARE CAPITAL + PREFERENCE SHARE CAPITAL+ RESERVES &
SURPLUS MISCELLANOUS EXPENSES TO THE EXTENT NOT WRITTEN OFF.
TOTAL ASSETS = FIXED ASSETS + CURRENT ASSETS
FINANCIAL YEAR 2006-2007
COMPANY
NET WORTH
TOTAL ASSETS
TATA STEEL
SAIL
JSW
13893.62
17184
5399.18
25597.50
22906.33
10779.74
PROPERITARY
RATIO
0.54
0.75
0.50
NET WORTH
TOTAL ASSETS
TATA STEEL
SAIL
JSW
27145.62
23004.09
7677.25
47075.52
27677.41
16475.62
PROPERITARY
RATIO
0.57
0.83
0.47
NET WORTH
TOTAL ASSETS
TATA STEEL
SAIL
JSW
30071.19
27984.10
7959.25
58741.77
36855.04
20653.04
PROPERITARY
RATIO
0.52
0.76
0.39
NET WORTH
TOTAL ASSETS
TATA STEEL
SAIL
JSW
36961.80
33316.70
9706.34
64232.78
51242.87
23256.39
PROPERITARY
RATIO
0.58
0.65
0.42
NET WORTH
TOTAL ASSETS
60
PROPERITARY
TATA STEEL
SAIL
JSW
46944.63
37069.47
17225.27
0.9
0.8
78555.91
58726.03
31493.65
0.83
0.76
0.75
0.7
0.6
0.5
RATIO
0.60
0.63
0.55
0.65
0.54
0.58
0.57
0.52
0.5
0.63
0.6
0.55
0.47
0.4
TATA S TEEL
0.42
0.39
S AIL
JS W
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
2006-2007
2007-2008
2008-2009
2009-2010
2010-2011
INTERPRETATION:
Proprietary ratio indicates the proportion of total assets funded by owners or shareholders. A higher
proprietary ratio is an indicator of sound financial position from the long term point of view because
it means a large proportion of total assets are provided by equity and hence the firm is thus less
dependent on the external sources of finance. A lower proprietary ratio is a danger signal for l.ong
term lenders as it indicates a lower margin of safety available to them.
TATA STEEL has maintained an overall consistent ratio throughout as in
the five year time.
The proprietary ratio of SAIL has been declining since the year 2007-2008.
The proprietary ratio of JSW has been increasing since 2008-2009.
TATA STEEL has been improving over the years and though SAIL has a
declining ratio throughout but anyhow it is in a better position than the other companies.
61
6. INTEREST COVER - This ratio is also known as time interest - earned ratio. It measures the firms
ability to make contractual interest payments. This ratio measures the debt servicing capacity of a firm
insofar as fixed interest on long term loan is concerned. It indicates the extent to which a fall in EBIT is
tolerable in that the ability of the firm to service its interest payments would not be adversely affected.
For instance, coverage of five times would indicate that a fall in operating earnings only to up to onefifth level can be tolerated.
The higher the ratio the greater is the ability of the firm to handle fixed charge
liabilities and the more assured is the payment of interest to them. However, too high a ratio would imply
unused debt capacity. A low ratio is danger signal that the firm is using excessive debt and does not have the
ability to offer assured payment of interest to the lenders.
FORMULA = PBIT
INTEREST
FINANCIAL YEAR 2006-2007
COMPANY
PBIT
INTEREST
TATA STEEL
6435.55
SAIL
9754.75
JSW
2314.72
FINANCIAL YEAR 2007-2008
173.90
332.13
399.54
COMPANY
INTEREST
PBIT
TATA STEEL
7945.06
SAIL
11719.67
JSW
2924.56
FINANCIAL YEAR 2008-2009
878.70
250.94
440.44
COMPANY
INTEREST
PBIT
TATA STEEL
8468.30
SAIL
9656.69
JSW
1474.88
FINANCIAL YEAR 2009-2010
1152.69
253.24
797.25
COMPANY
INTEREST
PBIT
TATA STEEL
8722.70
SAIL
10534.04
JSW
3678.57
FINANCIAL YEAR 2010-2011
1508.40
402.01
858.92
COMPANY
PBIT
INTEREST
TATA STEEL
SAIL
JSW
11077.34
7669.26
3477.46
1300.49
474.95
695.18
62
INTEREST
COVER
37.01
29.37
5.79
INTEREST
COVER
9.04
46.70
6.64
INTEREST
COVER
7.35
38.13
1.85
INTEREST
COVER
5.78
26.20
4.28
INTEREST
COVER
8.52
16.15
5.00
46.7
50
45
40
35
38.13
37.01
29.37
26.2
30
TATA S TEEL
25
S AIL
16.15
20
15
10
9.04
5.79
6.64
8.52
7.35
5.78
1.85
JS W
4.28
0
2006-2007
2007-2008
2008-2009
2009-2010
2010-2011
INTERPRETATION:
The interest cover ratio is used to determine how easily a company can be relieved of its burden to pay
interest expenses on outstanding debt. The lower the ratio, the more the company is burdened by debt
expense. When a company's interest coverage ratio is only 1.5 or lower, its ability to meet interest expenses
may be questionable.
TATA STEEL has had a steep fall in the ratio from the year 2006-2007(37.01) to the year
2007-2008(9.04) and this was mainly because the interest expenses had risen by leaps and bounds. And
thereafter the interest expenses continued to rise.
SAIL has a fluctuating ratio. The rise in the ratio was because of the reduction in the interest
expenses and a sudden fall was when the interest expenses were high.
JSW has witnessed a ratio of 1.85 for the year 2008-2009 because this year the profit before
interest and tax was 1474.88 which was quite less as compared to the previous year and the interest expenses
were 797.25 which had risen by 1.8 times as compared to the previous year.
63
7. DIVIDEND COVER RATIO - It measures the ability of a firm to pay dividend on preference shares
which carry a stated rate of return. This ratio is the ratio of net profits after taxes (EAT) and the amount
of preference dividend. The higher the coverage the better it is and vice versa
FORMULA = NET PROFIT AFTER TAX
DIVIDEND
PROFIT AFTER
TAX
4222.15
6202.29
1292
DIVIDEND
DIVIDEND COVER
1104.33
1478.40
199.39
3.82
4.20
6.48
DIVIDEND
DIVIDEND COVER
1393.55
1787.16
241.49
3.36
4.22
7.16
DIVIDEND
DIVIDEND COVER
1492.5
1255.16
55.41
3.49
4.92
17.30
DIVIDEND
DIVIDEND COVER
878.45
1590.55
240.93
5.75
4.25
8.40
DIVIDEND
DIVIDEND COVER
PROFIT AFTER
TAX
4687.03
7536.78
1728.19
PROFIT AFTER
TAX
5201.74
6174.81
958.50
PROFIT AFTER
TAX
5046.80
6754.37
2022.74
PROFIT AFTER
TAX
6865.69
4904.74
1307.77
1152.45
64
5.25
4.26
JSW
2010.67
350.09
5.74
20
17.3
18
16
14
12
TATA S TEEL
10
8
6.48
JS W
7.16
6
4
S AIL
8.4
4.92
4.2
3.82
4.22
3.36
3.49
2006-2007
2007-2008
2008-2009
5.75
4.25
5.74
5.25
4.26
2009-2010
2010-2011
2
0
INTERPRETATION:
The dividend cover ratio means that how easily the company can be relieved of its burden of paying the
dividends to the company.
TATA STEEL has been paying off its dividends at a consistent rate. And it seems that it has been
following a conservative approach.
JSW had paid a very high dividend for the year 2008-2009, which means that the company had declared
ala large part of its profit as dividend and thus following a liberal approach for paying the dividends.
65
8. EBIDTA TO TURNOVER RATIO - This ratio is used to assess a companys profitability by comparing
its turnover and earnings. Since EBITDA is derived from revenue this would indicate the percentage of a
company remaining after operating expenses.
Generally a higher ratio would indicate that the company is able to
keep its earnings at a good level through efficient processes that have kept certain expenses low.
EBIDTA
TURNOVER
TATA STEEL
SAIL
JSW
7254.84
10966.23
2812.95
17984.76
35924.07
8699.59
EBIDTA TO
TURNOVER RATIO
0.40
0.31
0.32
EBIDTA
TURNOVER
TATA STEEL
SAIL
JSW
8779.67
12955.15
3611.74
20028.28
41890.91
11677.14
EBIDTA TO
TURNOVER RATIO
0.44
0.31
0.31
EBIDTA
TURNOVER
TATA STEEL
SAIL
JSW
9441.70
10941.81
2302.54
24624.04
46248.61
14260.81
EBIDTA TO
TURNOVER RATIO
0.38
0.24
0.16
EBIDTA
TURNOVER
TATA STEEL
SAIL
JSW
9805.88
11871.28
4801.98
25875.77
43319.61
18735.32
EBIDTA TO
TURNOVER RATIO
0.38
0.27
0.26
TURNOVER
EBIDTA TO
EBIDTA
66
TATA STEEL
SAIL
JSW
12223.53
9155.06
4856.17
TURNOVER RATIO
0.40
0.20
0.21
30187.02
44918.67
23445.88
0.5
0.44
0.45
0.4
0.35
0.4
0.38
0.32
0.31
0.38
0.4
0.31
0.31
0.3
0.27
TATA S TEEL
0.24
0.25
0.20.21
0.2
0.16
S AIL
JS W
0.15
0.1
0.05
0
2006-2007
2007-2008
2008-2009
0.26
2009-2010
2010-2011
INTERPRETATION:
EBIDTA to turnover ratio signifies that higher the ratio the better it is. Since it means that earnings
before interest, depreciation and taxation.
TATA STEEL has maintained a positive rising graph throughout. And it has a ratio better than
the other two companies.
67
9. EARNING PER SHARE - This ratio measures the profitability on a per share basis i.e. the amount that
they can get on every share held. The higher the ratio the more amount the equity shareholders receive.
FORMULA =
PROFIT ATTRIBUTABLE TO SHAREHOLDERS
WEIGHTED AVERAGE NUMBER OF ORDINARY SHARES FOR BASIC EPS
FINANCIAL YEAR 2006-2007
COMPANY
TATA STEEL
SAIL
JSW
PROFIT O
ATTRIBUTABLE
SHAREHOLDERS
4222.15
6202.29
1259.35
WEIGHTED
AVERAGE NO. OF
ORDINARY SHARES
646823122
4130400545
157208820
EARNING PER
SHARE
WEIGHTED
AVEARGE NO. OF
ORDINARY SHARES
697748601
4130400545
177855318
EARNING PER
SHARE
WEIGHTED
AVEARGE NO. OF
ORDINARY SHARES
730584834
4130400545
187048666
EARNING PER
SHARE
WEIGHTED
AVEARGE NO. OF
ORDINARY SHARES
828550811
4130400545
187048682
EARNING PER
SHARE
WEIGHTED
AVEARGE NO. OF
ORDINARY SHARES
907252572
4130400545
203595864
EARNING PER
SHARE
73.76
15.02
80.11
TATA STEEL
SAIL
JSW
PROFIT
ATTRIBUTABLE TO
SHAREHOLDERS
4687.03
7536.78
1694.19
67.17
18.25
95.26
TATA STEEL
SAIL
JSW
PROFIT
ATTRIBUTABLE TO
SHAREHOLDERS
5073.69
6174.81
424.58
69.45
14.95
22.70
TATA STEEL
SAIL
JSW
PROFIT
ATTRIBUTABLE TO
SHAREHOLDERS
4993.12
6754.37
1989.01
60.26
16.35
106.34
TATA STEEL
SAIL
JSW
PROFIT
ATTRIBUTABLE TO
SHAREHOLDERS
6861.15
4904.74
1978.24
68
75.63
11.87
97.17
2010-2011
97.17
11.87
2009-2010
75.63
106.34
16.35
60.26
22.7
14.95
2008-2009
2007-2008
TATA S TEEL
67.17
80.11
15.02
20
JS W
95.26
18.25
2006-2007
S AIL
69.45
73.76
40
60
80
100
120
INTERPRETATION:
The ratio is helpful in the determination of the market price of the equity share of the company. The ratio is
also helpful in estimating the capacity of company to declare dividends on equity shares.
Higher the EPS the better is the capital productivity. It is an important measure of the economic
performance of a corporate entity.
JSW has the highest EPS as compared to the other two firms. And TATA STEEL has been quite
consistent in maintaining its ratio throughout.
69
10. GROSS PROFIT MARGIN - The ratio measures the margin of profit available on sales. The higher the
ratio the better it is for the company. It reflects the efficiency with which a firm produces its products.
FORMULA = GROSS PROFIT * 100
SALES
FINANCIAL YEAR 2006-2007
COMPANY
GROSS PROFIT
SALES
TATA STEEL
SAIL
JSW
6153.98
8656.19
2169.49
17551.09
34223.92
8554.36
GROSS PROFIT
MARGIN
35.06
25.29
25.36
GROSS PROFIT
SALES
TATA STEEL
SAIL
JSW
7388.93
10057.87
2667.42
19693.28
39508.45
11420.00
GROSS PROFIT
MARGIN
37.52
25.46
23.35
GROSS PROFIT
SALES
TATA STEEL
SAIL
JSW
8160.03
8040.59
2005.45
24315.77
43150.08
14001.25
GROSS PROFIT
MARGIN
33.55
18.63
14.32
GROSS PROFIT
SALES
TATA STEEL
SAIL
JSW
7868.91
8190.83
3149.49
25021.98
40551.38
18202.48
GROSS PROFIT
MARGIN
31.44
20.20
17.30
GROSS PROFIT
SALES
TATA STEEL
SAIL
JSW
10286.67
5304.80
3194.82
29396.35
42718.71
23163.24
70
GROSS PROFIT
MARGIN
34.99
12.42
13.79
40
35
37.52
35.06
34.99
33.55
31.44
30
25.46
23.35
25.36
25.29
25
18.63
20
20.2
TATA S TEEL
17.3
14.32
15
S AIL
13.79
12.42
JS W
10
5
0
2006-2007
2007-2008
2008-2009
2009-2010
2010-2011
INTEPRETATION:
The ratio measures the margin of profit available on sales. The higher the ratio the better it is. The ratio of
TATA STEEL has been fluctuating but it has been on a constant platform. The sales figures have been rising
so the fluctuations in the ratio can be attributed to the difference in the prices of the raw materials, freights
and wages.
The gross profit ratio of SAIL has been falling and which is again because of
the rise in the prices of the raw materials, wages and freight which have ultimately reduced the margin of the
gross profit.
The gross profit margin of JSW has also decreased since the selling prices
have not risen in the same proportion to the increase in the cost of the raw materials and other expenses.
TATA STEEL has a much favourable ratio as compared to the other two
companies. SAIL can take some measures such as procure raw materials at a cheaper price or to increase the
selling price in order to improve its gross profit margin.
71
11. NET PROFIT MARGIN - This ratio measures the relationship between EBIT to sales. It indicates the
efficiency of the management in manufacturing, selling, administration and other activities of the firm. It
is the overall measure of a firms profitability. It is represented as a percentage.
A high net profit margin would ensure adequate returns to the
owners as well as enable a firm to withstand adverse economic conditions when selling price is
declining, cost of production is rising and demand for product id falling. A low net profit margin
has the opposite implication.
FORMULA = NET PROFIT BEFORE INTEREST AND TAX * 100
SALES
FINANCIAL YEAR 2006-2007
COMPANY
NPBIT
SALES
TATA STEEL
SAIL
JSW
6435.55
9754.75
2314.72
17551.09
34223.92
8554.36
NET PROFIT
MARGIN
36.67
28.50
27.06
NPBIT
SALES
TATA STEEL
SAIL
JSW
7945.06
11719.67
2924.56
19693.28
39508.45
11420.00
NET PROFIT
MARGIN
40.34
29.66
25.60
NPBIT
SALES
TATA STEEL
SAIL
JSW
8468.30
9656.69
1474.88
24315.77
43150.08
14001.25
NET PROFIT
MARGIN
34.82
22.38
10.53
NPBIT
SALES
TATA STEEL
SAIL
JSW
8722.70
10534.04
3678.57
25021.98
40551.38
18202.48
72
NET PROFIT
MARGIN
34.86
25.98
20.21
NPBIT
SALES
TATA STEEL
SAIL
JSW
11077.34
7669.26
3477.46
29396.35
42718.71
23163.248
45
40
40.34
37.82
36.67
35
30
NET PROFIT
MARGIN
37.68
17.95
15.01
28.5
27.06
34.86
34.82
29.66
25.98
25.6
22.38
25
20.21
20
15
TATA S TEEL
17.95
15.01
S AIL
JS W
10.53
10
5
0
2006-2007
2007-2008
2008-2009
2009-2010
2010-2011
INTERPRETATION:
Net profit ratio reflects the net profit margin on the total sales after deducting all the expenses but before
deducting the interest and taxation. This ratio measures the efficiency of the operation of the company.
The trend of the graph of the net profit ratio is quite similar to that of the gross profit
margin ratio. Higher the ratio the better it is. TATA STEEL has been quite efficient in managing the
operating expenses of the firm.
73
12. CASH PROFIT RATIO - The Cash Ratio is the most conservative of all these measures of cash
resources, as only actual cash and securities easily convertible to cash are used to measure cash
resources. The short-term liquidity of a company may be measured through cash ratio.
FORMULA = CASH PROFIT
SALES
CASH PROFIT= NET PROFIT+ DEPRICIATION
FINANCIAL YEAR 2006-2007
COMPANY
CASH PROFIT
SALES
TATA STEEL
SAIL
JSW
5041.44
7413.77
1790.23
17551.09
34223.92
8554.36
CASH PROFIT
RATIO
28.72
21.85
20.93
CASH PROFIT
SALES
TATA STEEL
SAIL
JSW
5521.64
8772.26
2415.37
19693.28
39508.45
11420.00
CASH PROFIT
RATIO
28.38
22.20
21.15
CASH PROFIT
SALES
TATA STEEL
SAIL
JSW
6175.14
7459.93
1313.16
24315.77
43150.08
14001.25
CASH PROFIT
RATIO
25.40
17.29
9.38
CASH PROFIT
SALES
TATA STEEL
SAIL
JSW
6129.98
8091.61
3146.15
25021.98
40551.38
18202.48
CASH PROFIT
RATIO
24.50
19.95
17.28
COMPANY
CASH PROFIT
SALES
TATA STEEL
SAIL
JSW
8011.88
6890.54
3389.38
29396.35
42718.71
23163.25
30
28.72
28.38
27.25
25.4
25
24.5
22.2
21.15
21.85
20.93
19.95
17.29
20
CASH PROFIT
RATIO
27.25
14.95
14.63
17.28
14.95
14.63
15
TATA S TEEL
S AIL
JS W
9.38
10
0
2006-2007
2007-2008
2008-2009
2009-2010
2010-2011
INTERPRETATION:
The ratio measures the cash generation in the business as a result of the operation expressed in terms
of sales. The cash profit ratio is more reliable indicator of performance where there are sharp
fluctuations in profit before tax and the net profit from year to year owing to the difference in
depreciation.
It facilitates the inter firm comparison of performance since different methods of depreciation
may be adopted by different companies.
TATA STEEL is ahead of the other two companies and has a better graph as compared to SAIL
and JSW.
75
13. RETURN ON ASSETS - Here the profitability is measured in terms of the relationship between net
profits and assets. The ROA may be also called as profit-to-asset ratio. It can be interpreted in two ways.
First, it measures managements ability and efficiency in using the firms assets to generate (operating)
profits. Second, it reports the total return accruing to all providers of capital (debt and equity),
independent of the source of capital.
FORMULA =
EBIT
AVERAGE TOTAL ASSETS
FINANCIAL YEAR 2006-2007
COMPANY
EBIT
TATA STEEL
6435.55
SAIL
9754.75
JSW
2314.72
FINANCILA YEAR 2007-2008
COMPANY
EBIT
TATA STEEL
7945.06
SAIL
11719.67
JSW
2924.56
FINANCIAL YEAR 2008-2009
COMPANY
EBIT
TATA STEEL
8468.30
SAIL
9656.69
JSW
1474.88
FINANCIAL YEAR 2009-2010
COMPANY
EBIT
TATA STEEL
8722.70
SAIL
10534.04
JSW
3678.57
FINANCIAL YEAR 2010-2011
COMPANY
EBIT
TATA STEEL
11077.34
AVERAGE TOTAL
ASSETS
20107.33
20644.91
RETURN ON
ASSETS
0.32
0.47
AVERAGE TOTAL
ASSETS
36336.51
25291.87
13627.68
RETURN ON
ASSETS
0.22
0.46
0.21
AVERAGE TOTAL
ASSETS
52908.65
32266.23
18564.33
RETURN ON
ASSETS
0.16
0.30
0.08
AVERAGE TOTAL
ASSETS
61487.28
44143.57
21954.72
RETURN ON
ASSETS
0.14
0.24
0.17
AVERAGE TOTAL
ASSETS
71394.35
RETURN ON
ASSETS
0.11
76
SAIL
JSW
0.5
7669.26
3477.46
0.47
54984.45
27375.02
0.14
0.13
0.46
0.45
0.4
0.35
0.32
0.3
0.3
0.25
TATA S TEEL
0.24
0.21
S AIL
0.21
0.2
0.16 0.17
0.15
JS W
0.14 0.13
0.15
0.14
2009-2010
2010-2011
0.08
0.1
0.05
0
2006-2007
2007-2008
2008-2009
INTERPRETATION:
The ratio indicates how profitable a company is relative to its total assets. The ratio illustrates how well
management is employing companys total assets to make a profit. The higher the return, the more
efficient management is in utilizing the assets base.
Here we can conclude that SAIL has not been utilizing its asset base efficiently and so the graph has
taken a downward trend.
TATA STEEL has also not been very efficient in utilizing the asset base of the company.
77
14. RETURN ON AVERAGE NET WORTH - This ratio measures the return on the total equity funds of
ordinary shares. From this ratio it can be judged whether the firm has earned a satisfactory return for its
shareholders or not. The higher the ratio, the better it is for the shareholders.
FORMULA= PROFIT AFTER TAX
AVERAGE NET WORTH
FINANCIAL YEAR 2006-2007
COMPANY
PROFIT AFTER
TAX
AVERAGE NET
WORTH
TATA STEEL
SAIL
JSW
4222.15
6202.29
1292
11697.83
14784.80
RETURN ON
AVEARGE NET
WORTH
0.36
0.42
PROFIT AFTER
TAX
AVERAGE NET
WORTH
TATA STEEL
SAIL
JSW
4687.03
7536.78
1728.19
20519.62
20094.05
6538.22
RETURN ON
AVEARGE NET
WORTH
0.23
0.38
0.26
PROFIT AFTER
TAX
AVERAGE NET
WORTH
TATA STEEL
SAIL
JSW
5201.74
6174.81
958.50
28608.41
25494.10
7827.25
RETURN ON
AVEARGE NET
WORTH
0.18
0.24
0.12
PROFIT AFTER
TAX
AVERAGE NET
WORTH
TATA STEEL
SAIL
5046.80
6754.37
33516.50
30650.40
78
RETURN ON
AVEARGE NET
WORTH
0.15
0.22
JSW
2022.74
8832.80
0.23
RETURN ON
AVEARGE NET
WORTH
0.16
0.14
0.15
PROFIT AFTER
TAX
AVERAGE NET
WORTH
TATA STEEL
SAIL
JSW
6865.69
4904.74
2010.67
41953.22
35193.09
13465.81
0.45
0.4
0.42
0.38
0.36
0.35
0.3
0.26
0.24
0.23
0.23
0.25
0.22
0.18
0.2
0.15 0.15
0.12
0.15
TATA S TEEL
0.16
0.14
S AIL
JS W
0.1
0.05
0
2006-2007
2007-2008
2008-2009
2009-2010
2010-2011
INTERPRETATION:
It expresses the net profit in terms of equity shareholders fund. It is an important yardstick of performance
for equity shareholders since it indicates the return on funds employed by them. However this measure is
based on the historical net worth and will be high for old plants and low for new plants.
The factor which motivates the shareholders to invest in a company is the
expectations of an adequate rate of return on their funds, they will want to assess the rate of return in order
to decide whether to continue their investments or not.
79
EBIT
AVERAGE CAPITAL
EMPLOYED
TATA STEEL
SAIL
JSW
6435.55
9754.75
2314.72
19879.43
20601.58
COMPANY
EBIT
AVERAGE CAPITAL
EMPLOYED
TATA STEEL
SAIL
JSW
7945.06
11719.67
2924.56
36157.69
25326.71
13530.25
COMPANY
EBIT
AVERAGE CAPITAL
EMPLOYED
TATA STEEL
SAIL
JSW
8468.30
9656.69
1474.88
52778.56
32236.49
18564.33
RETURN ON
AVERAGE CAPITAL
EMPLOYED
0.16
0.30
0.08
COMPANY
EBIT
AVERAGE CAPITAL
EMPLOYED
RETURN ON
AVERAGE CAPITAL
80
RETURN ON
AVERAGE CAPITAL
EMPLOYED
0.32
0.47
RETURN ON
AVERAGE CAPITAL
EMPLOYED
0.22
0.46
0.22
EMPLOYED
0.14
0.24
0.17
TATA STEEL
SAIL
JSW
8722.70
10534.04
3678.57
61434.74
44048.96
21954.72
COMPANY
EBIT
AVERAGE CAPITAL
EMPLOYED
TATA STEEL
SAIL
JSW
11077.34
7669.26
3477.46
71394.35
54984.45
27375.02
0.5
0.47
RETURN ON
AVERAGE CAPITAL
EMPLOYED
0.16
0.14
0.13
0.46
0.45
0.4
0.35
0.32
0.3
0.3
0.25
0.22
S AIL
0.2
0.16
0.17
0.15
0.1
TATA S TEEL
0.24
0.22
0.14
0.13
0.16
0.14
JS W
0.08
0.05
0
2006-2007
2007-2008
2008-2009
2009-2010
2010-2011
INTERPRETATION:
Return on average capital employed ratio narrows the focus to gain a better understanding of a company's
ability to generate returns from its available capital base.
By comparing net income to the sum of a company's debt and equity
capital, investors can get a clear picture of how the use of leverage impacts a company's profitability.
Financial analysts consider the ROCE measurement to be a more comprehensive profitability indicator
because it gauges management's ability to generate earnings from a company's total pool of capital.
81
16. DIVIDEND PAYOUT RATIO - This ratio indicates the percentage PAT distributed as dividends to
equity shareholders. It is also known as pay-out ratio. For instance PAT are Rs. 500000 and the dividend
is Rs. 300000 then the dividend pay -out ratio would be 60%. This implies that 40% of the profits of the
firm are retained (retention ratio) and 60% distributed as dividends. Therefore, the higher the ratio the
more dividends can be received.
= DIVIDEND (EQUITY)/ PROFIT AFTER TAX
FINANCIAL YEAR 2006-2007
COMPANY
DIVIDEND(EQUITY)
TATA STEEL
SAIL
JSW
1104.33
1478.40
199.39
4222.15
6202.29
1292
DIVIDEND PAYOUT
RATIO
26.16
23.89
15.43
DIVIDEND(EQUITY)
TATA STEEL
SAIL
JSW
1393.55
1787.16
241.49
4687.03
7536.78
1728.19
DIVIDEND PAYOUT
RATIO
29.73
23.71
13.97
DIVIDEND(EQUITY)
TATA STEEL
SAIL
JSW
1492.5
1255.16
55.41
5201.74
6174.81
958.50
DIVIDEND PAYOUT
RATIO
28.69
20.33
5.78
DIVIDEND(EQUITY)
TATA STEEL
878.45
5046.80
82
DIVIDEND PAYOUT
RATIO
17.41
SAIL
JSW
1590.55
240.93
6754.37
2022.74
23.55
11.91
DIVIDEND PAYOUT
RATIO
19.05
23.50
17.41
DIVIDEND(EQUITY)
TATA STEEL
SAIL
JSW
1307.77
1152.45
350.09
6865.69
4904.74
2010.67
35
29.73
30
28.69
26.16
25
23.89
23.71
23.55
20.3
20
19.05
17.41
15.43
15
23.5
17.41
TATA S TEEL
S AIL
13.97
JS W
11.97
10
5.78
5
0
2006-2007
2007-2008
2008-2009
2009-2010
2010-2011
INTERPRETATION:
This ratio identifies the percentage of earnings (net income) per common share allocated to paying
cash dividends to shareholders. The dividend payout ratio is an indicator of how well earnings support the
dividend payment.
It indicates the extent to the net profit distributed to the shareholders as dividend. A high payout
signifies a liberal distribution policy and a low payout reflects conservative distribution policy,
83
RECOMMENDATION:
Tata steel should try to improve its solvency so that at the time of crisis they dont have to sell of
CONCLUSION
Tata Steel has been analyzed in terms of financial aspects especially working capital and financial ratios. A
comparison has been made with JSW and SAIL to see the position of Tata Steel Ltd. in the industry.
Working capital management is a very crucial part of any organization. It needs to maintain its working
capital efficiently for its day to day operations to take place. An organization needs proper liquidity to meet
its obligations on time.
Ratio analysis is also a very important part of a business. It is a platform to judge a company based on
liquidity, profitability etc. It is very crucial for banks, investors, creditors etc. It also makes comparisons
easier.
Tata Steel has been able to maintain a good liquidity position throughout. It has been able to pay back its
liabilities on time and also has been able to give dividends on time to its shareholders. It has also maintained
a good level of EPS. The inventory turnover has been maintained efficiently which we can see from the high
inventory turnover ratio.
85
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Gerald I. White, Ashwinpaul C. Sondhi & Dov Fried (2011). The Analysis And Use Of Financial
Statements- Third edition.
http://www.tatasteel.com/about-us/company-profile.asp
http://www.ey.com/Publication/vwLUAssets/Global_Steel_Report_2010-2011/$FILE/Global%20Steel
%20Report%202010-2011%20FULL%20REPORT.pdf
http://www.zacks.com/stock/news/49743/steel-industry-outlook-%96-march-2011
Research and Markets: Analyzing the Indian Steel Industry 2012 Edition is Completed with An
Analysis of the Major Players in the Indian Steel Sector | Japan Metal Bulletin
Top Indian Steel Companies Performance | News From Business, Finance, Share Market Real Estate
86