Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
any tax levied for a special purpose shall be treated as a special fund and paid out for such
purpose only. The Congress may, by law, authorize the President to fix within specified
limits, and subject to such limitations and restriction as it may impose, tariff rates, import and
export quotas, tonnage and wharfage dues, and other duties or imposts within the framework
of the national development program of the Government (Article VI, Section 28, paragraph ).
The laws governing taxation in the Philippines are contained within the National
Internal Revenue Code. This code underwent substantial revision with passage of the Tax
Reform Act of 1997. This law took effect on January 1, 1998. Taxation is administered
through the Bureau of Internal Revenue which comes under the Department of Finance.
Tax law in the Philippines covers national and local taxes. National taxes refer to
national internal revenue taxes imposed and collected by the national government through the
Bureau of Internal Revenue (BIR) and local taxes refer to those imposed and collected by the
local government.
In Uganda, according to Bird (1974), tax administration refers to the identification of
the taxpayer, assessment of tax payable, collection of taxes and enforcement of tax liability.
According to Olman (1967), tax administration refers to a structure/procedure of
identification of potential taxpayer, collection and laws governing taxation.
RoyBahl (1988) says that much attention should be paid to critical aspects of tax
administration, training, procedures, staffing, collection and use of information. The
weaknesses in tax administration are mainly caused by lack of relevant information about the
taxpayer, continued criticism of the tax and its structure. The tax structure should be simple
in order to avoid tax evasion. Income tax is affected by the complexity of the rules and
procedures to be followed in in the calculation of tax bands. This hinders tax administration
in the economy and consequently the performance of the business sector,
On the assessment of tax payer, Income Tax Act (1997) section 3 (a), defines
assessment as the ascertainment of the chargeable income and the amount of tax payable on it
by the tax payer for a year of income. Assessment of tax is a process of ascertaining the
amount of tax to be levied on a person/business according to his/its income. According to the
income tax Act (1997) section 96 (1) the commissioner is required to make an assessment of
the chargeable income based on his returns and on any other information available within
seven days from the date the return was furnished. However, small-scale businesses are not
required to submit in any return to the commissioner.
For Small-scale business, according to the Income Tax Act (1997), small-scale
businesses are those with growth turn-over of less than 50 million shillings per annum. In
Uganda, it is not only income tax Act that has tried to define small-scale businesses; there are
also institutions, which have tried to define small-scale business (SSB) such as; Ministry of
Finance Planning and Economic Development (MFPED), the Uganda Small Scale Industries
Association (USSIA). The MFPED defines SSB as a unit with a capital investment not
exceeding US$ 300,000. The USSIA defines SSB as those with employees between 1-25
people and assets and capital exceeding US$ 1,000,000.
In the Philippines the tax department, popularly known as Bureau of Internal Revenue
(BIR), is under the aegis of the Department of Finance. The tax department has enormous
and wide ranging administrative and legislative powers when it comes to assessment,
enforcing taxes and collection. The tax department in the Philippines does not collect VAT
(value added tax) and excise tax as these are collected by the Bureau of Customs. The BIR is
considered to be the main revenue "earning" agency for the government of Philippines.
Annual the bureau collects practically 80 percent of the total generated revenue. The BIR has
monthly and annual targets for collection and this is determined by the Development Budget
and Coordinating Council, which is an inter-agency council headed by the Department of
Budget and Management. History of taxation in the Philippines is not that old. Selfassessment system for individuals and corporations was introduced as early as 1934 when the
first Philippine Tax Code was enacted by the parliament. This code was immediately applied
to income tax, corporation income tax, and inheritance tax. Later on the area of application
was expanded and other national internal revenue taxes were encompassed. The Withholding
Tax System was introduced and implemented in 1951. Even today, this system is the main
method of collecting income. Today tax payers can directly pay taxes either to the BIR using
conduits like RDOs or authorized banks. In the Philippines, individual tax returns have to be
filed by April 15 of the following year for the previous calendar year. There is the option of
paying and filing taxes electronically using the Internet banking through Electronic Filing
and Payment System (EFPS). This system was introduced in 2001.
And recently, the Bureau of Internal Revenue stated that owners of small sari-sari
(variety) stores, farmers, fishermen, single-unit tricycle operators and other marginal income
earners (MIEs) are still liable to pay tax. BIR reminded concerned individuals specifically
MIEs which have been enjoying certain privileges under the law that they must still comply
with several tax and tax-related requirements.
Theoretical Framework
Governments at all levels (national, regional and local) need to raise revenue from a
variety of sources to finance public expenditure. Public expenditure concerns the optimal
provision of public goods. In public-finance literature, there are two theories: the ability
theory (presented by Arthur Cecil Pigou and the benefit theory (developed by Erik Lindahl.
The benefit theory has a modern version, known as the "voluntary exchange" theory.Most
governments collect funds from various sources to provide public services or to finance
transfer payments. Taxation is the most common source of revenue in mixed economies.
Under the benefit theory, tax levels are automatically determined, because taxpayers
pay proportionately for the government benefits they receive. In other words, the individuals
who benefit the most from public services pay the most taxes.In analyzing the benefit
approach, two models have been discussed: the Lindahl model and the Bowen model.
A Lindahl tax is a form of taxation in which individuals pay for the provision of a
public good according to their marginal benefits. So each individual pays according to his/her
marginal benefit derived from the public good. e.g. If AZ loves scenic beauty and likes to be
close to nature he might be ready to pay 5 dollars per day for sitting in a park, whereas a
college student who does not visit the park very often will not be ready to pay so much, but
might agree to pay 1 dollar. So a person who values the good more pays more.
A Lindahl equilibrium is a state of economic equilibrium under such a tax.
Individuals in a society have different preferences based on their nature, personal choice etc.
So an individual's willingness to pay for a public good is a function of many factors, like
income, preference etc. So a student will want to pay just 1 dollar for entering a museum but
a business man will be ready to pay 10 dollars for the same museum. So in such cases the
problem of supply of the public good, at optimal levels arises. Lindahl taxation is a solution
for this problem.
In his 1919 contribution entitled "Just TaxationA Positive Solution" (a part of his
book Die Gerechtigkeit der Besteuerung), Lindahl treats the problem of tax-share
determination as one of bilateral exchange in an "isolated" community with two categories of
taxpayers, one "well-to-do" and the other "relatively poor". The problem of the distribution
of the tax shares is then considered to be one settled by free argument, or "a kind of
economic exchange." (Lindahl of course recognized that this process was filtered through
protagonists in a political process and that resultant tax-share distributions assigned would be
influenced by their relative power, but he assumed initially that such political "blocs" did not
influence the model under free exchange.).
Bowens model has more operational significance, since it demonstrates that when
social goods are produced under conditions of increasing costs, the opportunity cost of
private goods is foregone. The ability-to-pay approach treats government revenue and
expenditures separately. Taxes are based on taxpayers ability to pay; there is no quid pro
quo. Taxes paid are seen as a sacrifice by taxpayers, which raises the issues of what the
sacrifice of each taxpayer should be and how it should be measured: (1) Equal sacrifice: The
total loss of utility as a result of taxation should be equal for all taxpayers (the rich will be
taxed more heavily than the poor); (2)Equal proportional sacrifice: The proportional loss of
utility as a result of taxation should be equal for all taxpayers; (3)Equal marginal sacrifice:
The instantaneous loss of utility (as measured by the derivative of the utility function) as a
result of taxation should be equal for all taxpayers. This will entail the least aggregate
sacrifice (the total sacrifice will be the least).
Ability to pay, the dominant theory of taxation, is usually interpreted in terms of
sacrifice. It is held to justify progressive taxation under any one of three possible
interpretations of sacrifice: the equal, equal-proportional, and least-sacrifice theories. These
theories rest in turn on three assumptions: the declining marginal utility of money with an
increase in its supply, the existence of sacrifice. Analysis discloses each of these supports to
be defective and thereby breaks down the theory of ability to pay. Progressive taxation may,
however, be justified on other grounds. These grounds should be founded on the broad
realities of the economic system. Taxes have economic effects, and these effects entail social
consequences. The choice of the taxes to be laid and rates at which they are to be applied
expresses a preference for one set of economic effects, and hence of social consequences, to
another. The theory of taxation, progressive or other, should correspond to these facts. The
thin nebula of hedonism in reverse is no longer adequate.
Helmholtz (1821-1894) is considered one of the founders of perceptual research. He
argued that between sensations and our conscious perception of the real world there must be
intermediate processes. Such processes would be, for example, 'inferential thinking' - which
allows us to go beyond the evidence of the senses (these inferences are at an unconscious
level). Thus Helmholtz was an early Constructivist who believed perception is more than
direct registration of sensations, but that other events intervene between stimulation and
experience. Top-down and bottom-up are both strategies of information processing and
knowledge ordering, used in a variety of fields including software, humanistic and scientific
theories and management and organization. In practice, they can be seen as a style of
thinking and teaching.
Marginal Income
Earners
a. Farmer
b. Fishermen
c. Small sarisari store
owner
d. Driver /
operator
e. Small
carenderia
turoturo
f. Computer
shop owner
PROCESS
a. Survey
questionnair
e
b. Analysis
and
interpretatio
n
c. Statistical
tools
Frequency
of
percentage
Sample
mean
OUTPUTS
Memorandum
Circular No. 72014
FEEDBACK
As derived from the taxation process models, the Marginal Income Earners: farmer,
fishermen, small sari-sari store owner, driver / operator, small carinderia turo- turo and
computer shop owner as dependent variable. Consequently, the Memorandum Circular No 72014 is determined on how home-based business owners perceived about taxation. It relates
10
the knowledge of home-based business owners to taxes imposed to them, to their level of
awareness to the privileges and requirement of the tax system.
11
12
13
14
Withholding tax is the amount of an employee's pay withheld by the employer and
sent directly to the government as partial payment of income tax.