Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Hazards: Neighborhood-level
Environmental Health Information
Concerning Coal Ash Ponds
Stephanie Piperno, Jeff Rose PhD
Davidson College
Davidson, NC
March 13, 2015
Research questions
q 1) How aware are Stonewater residents of Riverbends coal ash
ponds and how did these residents become aware and
educated about the ponds?
q 2) What sources of information did the residents find most
trustworthy?
q 3) What sources of information do the residents perceive as
responsible for disseminating environmental risk information?
Hypotheses
Two dependent variables:
q Knowledge
q Source of information
q Independent Variables:
q Years lived in Stonewater
q Level of education
q Race
q Gender
Methods
q Developed a 23-question questionnaire
q Created a pilot questionnaire and distributed it to a local community
q Administered using three methods:
o By foot to 150 homes
o On the community home page
o Personal emails sent to 140 residents
Questionnaire results
q 35 responses over a 27 day period
q 82% white
q 56% of respondents were male
q Response rate?
Level of Education
Response
3%
Trade/technical/vocational
training
0%
Associate degree
27%
Master's degree
10
30%
Professional degree
10
30%
Doctorate degree
9%
Total
33
100%
Number of
Year moved into home
Residents
N/A
2003
2005
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
Results
Regression 1: Knowledge as dependent variable
Regression
Statistics
Multiple
R
0.595474941
R
Square
0.354590405
Adjusted
R
Square
-0.063027568
Standard
Error
0.592327159
Observations
29
ANOVA
df
Regression
Residual
Total
Intercept
Year
Q19
Education
Q21
Black
Q21
Asian
Q20
Female
Q12
Duke
Q12
Developer
Q12
Real
Estate
Q12
Media
Q12
Town
Q12
Resident
11
17
28
Coefficients
53.02666334
-0.026182068
-0.079059514
0.545384906
0.496171336
0.315492364
0.216003403
0.162012683
-0.216281638
0.130467425
-0.122943198
0.14665833
SS
MS
3.276904432 0.2979004
5.964474879 0.35085146
9.24137931
Standard
Error
102.2934584
0.050811314
0.121141439
0.686721332
0.53576043
0.286871643
0.155471719
0.254332517
0.238170013
0.164184032
0.182025283
0.165518477
t
Stat
0.51837785
-0.5152803
-0.6526215
0.79418664
0.92610672
1.09976839
1.38934209
0.63701128
-0.9080977
0.79464138
-0.6754183
0.88605413
F
Significance
F
0.84907841 0.59957727
P-value
0.610876077
0.612992693
0.52272829
0.438033376
0.367351978
0.286763574
0.182659516
0.532602834
0.376520471
0.437775834
0.50849388
0.387950738
Lower
95%
-162.79367
-0.1333846
-0.3346456
-0.9034705
-0.6341844
-0.2897539
-0.1120133
-0.374582
-0.7187764
-0.2159306
-0.506983
-0.2025551
Upper
95%
268.846995
0.08102043
0.17652658
1.99424027
1.62652704
0.92073863
0.54402006
0.69860739
0.28621316
0.47686545
0.26109658
0.49587179
Significant Results
Significance F
P-Value
(Education)
Coefficients
Social Media
0.024
0.035
-5.835
Real Estate
0.020
0.035
-5.711
Community
0.025
0.039
-5.753
Discussion
q Residents are more informed today about environmental risks of
coal ash ponds.
q Level of education influences what sources people use
Awareness when first moved to Stonewater
Answer
Awareness today
Response
Response
Very aware
15%
19
56%
Somewhat aware
12
35%
14
41%
Unaware
24%
3%
26%
0%
Total
34
100%
34
100%
Conclusions
Research
q Small sample size
q Needed more questions about
demographics (income, job, and
age)
q Most concerned residents could
have already moved out of
Stonewater
q Could explore further the types of
sources individuals use to obtain
information
Ex. What kind of materials are
people using when they select
personal investigation
Application
q One organized, trusted, and
accessible system of
environmental risk information
q Mixed levels of community
engagement
q Economic interests outweigh
health concerns
Sources
http://appvoices.org/coalash/facts/
http://earthjustice.org/features/the-coal-ash-problem
http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2011/
apr/04/world-bank-funding-coal-power
http://www.southeastcoalash.org/
http://www.resilience.org/stories/2013-07-22/
water-stress-threatens-future-energy-production
http://imgarcade.com/1/coal-ash-pond/