Sie sind auf Seite 1von 13

CONSTRUCTION RISK ASSESSMENT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

PROVISION OF TRANSPORTATION AND INSTALLATION OF OFFSHORE FACILITIES FOR SKO


PIPELINE REPLACEMENT
INTRODUCTION
1) Construction Risk Assessment (CRA) for Baram Field was conducted on the 22nd June 2011
2) The tentative works schedule are as follows:
Activities
Pipelay
Duration.
(1) Riser: 1ea x 12 inch at BADP-G
Barge Mas Approximately 1.5km (2) Riser: 1ea x 12 inch at BAP-AA
Mulia
of pipeline and 2
(3) Pipeline: 12 inch x 1.5km, FULL replacement of BADP-G ~ BAP-AA
risers 30 days
(4) Spool Tie-in: 12 inch at BAP-AA
offshore
(5) Mattress: 1 ea at BADP-G
ii) Lifting activities
iii) Riser installation
SCOPE OF ASSESSMENT
1) The CRA covered the following specific activities only:
1) Barge Setup
2) Barge Positioning
3) Pipeline pick-up
4) Barge side walk
5) Diver metrology
6) Install new riser clamp
7) Install new riser
APPROACH
1) The construction risk assessment was performed based on the project scope of work and general
execution plan for the work.
2) The construction risk assessment process was conducted firstly by listing of major work activities
followed by listing of all risk issues associated to each major work activity.
3) For each risk issue, the consequences and causes of the risk were identified. Each risk was then
evaluated using the risk matrix.
4) Mitigation measures for each cause were then identified for implementation to further reduce the
5) A re-evaluation of the risk level was done to determine the risk reduction resulting from the
implementation of the mitigation measures.
6) A conscious decision was made to exclude normal construction safety risks and other routine
activities that are generally covered by Job Safety Analysis (JSA) during assessment.
ASSESSMENT RESULTS
1)
2)

3)

For each risk issue in every activity, the highest rating was taken as the risk rating to describe the
worst case scenario.
A total of 8 risk issues were identified.
(R1) - Barge contact with platform during setup and anchor drop / drag live existing pipeline
(R2)- Heat radiation and fire ball within 42.5m radius.
(R3)- Pipe buckle (Pipeline pick-up)
(R4)- Pipe buckle (Barge side walk)
(R5)- (1) Drop object on diver
(R5)- (2) Wrong measurement
(R6)- (1) Diver hit by riser clamp during setup
(R6)- (2) Injury during water jet cleaning
(R6)- (3) Hand pinch
(R6)- (4) Drop object on diver
(R7)- Rigging failure during lifting and lowering of Riser

On overall, 0 of the risk issues fell under "Very High Risk", 1 rated in "High Risk), 5 risk issues were
rated as "Medium Risk" and 5 "Low Risk".After applying appropriate mitigation measures the ratings
were reduced as depicted below.

4)

The distribution of risks (worst case scenario) are summarised as below.

1) People
Assessment Before Mitigation
1

R5

Assessment After Mitigation


5

R1, R2

D
C

D
R3, R4
R5, R6,
R7

B
A

R3, R4

R1, R5, R7

R2, R5,
R6

2) Environment
Assessment Before Mitigation
1
2
3
4

Assessment After Mitigation


1
2
3

C
R5

R4

R3

R5, R6,
R7

R2

C
R1

R3, R4
R1, R2,
R5, R5,
R6, R7

3) Asset
Assessment Before Mitigation
1
2
3
4

Assessment After Mitigation


1
2
3

D
R3

R1, R5,
R6, R7

R5

R3, R4

C
R2

R1, R5, R7

R2, R5,
R6

4) Reputation
Assessment Before Mitigation
1
2
3
4

Assessment After Mitigation


1
2
3

C
B

R4

R3

R5

R2, R5,
R6, R7

C
R1

R3, R4
R1, R5, R7

R2, R5,
R6

A
Legend
Very High Risk
High risk
Medium Risk
Low Risk

R1 : Risk no. 1, refer to construction risk register

UMMARY

FACILITIES FOR SKO

22nd June 2011

ent of BADP-G ~ BAP-AA

e of work and general

major work activities

. Each risk was then

to further reduce the


sulting from the

and other routine


ssment.

rating to describe the

existing pipeline

Risk), 5 risk issues were


ion measures the ratings

fter Mitigation
4

fter Mitigation

fter Mitigation

fter Mitigation

n risk register

REFERENCE:RISK ASSESSMENT MATRIX

Severity

1
Insignificant

2
Minor

3
Moderate

4
Major

People

Slight injury

Minor Injury

Major Injury

Single Fatality

Asset

Slight
Damage

Minor
Damage

Environment
Reputation
E
Almost Certain
D
Likely
C
Possible
B
Unlikely
A
Remotely likely to
happen
Low Risk
Medium Risk High Risk
Very High Ris -

Happens several
times per year at
location
Happens several
times per year in
company
Incident has
occurred in our
company
Heard of incident
in industry
Never heard in
industry

Slight Impact Minor Impact

Local Damage Major Damage


Localized
Impact

Major Impact

Slight Impact

Limited
Impact

E1

E2

E3

E4

E5

D1

D2

D3

D4

D5

C1

C2

C3

C4

C5

B1

B2

B3

B4

B5

A1

A2

A3

A4

A5

Manage for continuos improvement


Incorporate risk reduction measures
Incorporate risk reduction measures
Intolerable; incorporate risk reduction measures

Considerable Major National


Impact
Impact

5
Catastrophic
Multiple
Fatalities
Extensive
Damage
Massive
Impact
Major
International
Impact

CONSTRUCTION RISK ASSESSMENT


PROJECT

PROVISION OF TRANSPORTATION AND INSTALLATION OF OFFSHORE FACILITIES FOR SKO PIPELINE REPLACEMENT

SESSION DATE

ACTIVITY

RISER INSTALLATION - PL 369

18 August 2011

LOCATION

BARAM FIELD

DESCRIPTION OF ACTIVITIES

NO

Activities

RISK ISSUES

Location

1) Barge Setup
2) Pipeline pick-up
3) Barge side walk

CONSEQUENCES

4) Diver metrology
5) Install new riser clamp
6) Install new riser

CAUSES

RISK RATING
BEFORE
P

Barge setup

(R1) Barge contact with


platform during setup and
anchor drop / drag live existing
pipeline

(1) Property damage (barge


equipment, pipelines, platform)
(2) Schedule impact
(3) Hydrocarbon release
(4) High TRCF/ loss of life/
personnel injury
(5) Tarnish image
(6) Environmental impact
(7) Cost impact

MITIGATION MEASURES

TECo Office

ACTION PARTY

DUE DATE

(1) Adverse weather condition

B3 B5 B4 B5 (1) Obtain 6hourly weather forecast


(1) OCS, BF,
(2) Weather watch on standby to observe
Surveyor, FE,
sudden changes of weather condition
MC, OIM
(3) Observe sea state limitation for anchoring
(4) Approved setup procedure/ approved
anchor pattern
(5) Permit to work system, toolbox meeting,
JHA, meeting
(6) Established communication with patform

(2) Strong current

B3 B5 B4 B5 (1) Obtain weather forecast from various


sources
(2) Closely monitor current condition at site
by using current meter

(1), OCS,
Prior to start
MC,BF, Surveyor work

(3) Poor visibility

B3 B5 B4 B5 (1) 100% backup on BMS


(2) Experienced personnel
(3) Comply with approved procedure
(4) Proper anchor management system in
place
(5) Adequate lighting facilities

(1), OCS,
Prior to start
MC,BF, Surveyor work

(4) Poor coordination between


barge/boats/platform

B3 B5 B4 B5 (1) JSA Meeting prior to anchoring


(2) Follow PCSB anchoring guide
(3) Ensure, establish and maintain
communication between barge and boats
are in working condition
(4) SISO approved before start work

(1), OCS, BF,


MC, OIM

Prior to start
work

(5) Communication failure between B3 B5 B4 B5 (1) Pre-test the communication system with (1), OCS, BF,
vessels, platform, barge (e.g. radio
all relevant parties
MC, OIM
failure)
(2) Dedicated communication channel to be
established between the barge anchor
foreman, surveyor and tug boat captain
(3) Use communication language as
captured in the communication protocol
(4) Platform spreads to notify barge before
approaching platform

Prior to start
work

(6) Anchor line/mooring parted

Prior to start
work

B3 B5 B4 B5 (1) Valid certification and visual inspection of (1) OCS, BF, MC Prior to start
towing equipment (anchor lines and tow
work
lines, winches etc)

Page 10 of 13

RISK RATING
AFTER
E

STATUS

CONSTRUCTION RISK ASSESSMENT


PROJECT

PROVISION OF TRANSPORTATION AND INSTALLATION OF OFFSHORE FACILITIES FOR SKO PIPELINE REPLACEMENT

SESSION DATE

ACTIVITY

RISER INSTALLATION - PL 369

18 August 2011

LOCATION

BARAM FIELD

DESCRIPTION OF ACTIVITIES

NO

Activities

RISK ISSUES

Location

1) Barge Setup
2) Pipeline pick-up
3) Barge side walk

CONSEQUENCES

4) Diver metrology
5) Install new riser clamp
6) Install new riser

CAUSES

RISK RATING
BEFORE
P

Pipeline Pick-up

(R2)Pipe buckle

(1) Property damage


(2) Schedule impact
(3) Cost impact

MITIGATION MEASURES

TECo Office

ACTION PARTY

DUE DATE

(7) AHT Breakdown

B3 B5 B4 B5 (1) Conduct PCSB, OSVIS and MWS


inspection for all vessels
(2) To engage only approved AHT
(3) Pre job briefing and tool box meeting /
equipment check
(4) PMS
(5) Two AHT's at site

(8) Survey system failure/ Wrong


placement

B3 B5 B4 B5 (1) Calibrate system


(1) OCS, BF,
(2) Check the survey system equipment fit to Surveyor, MC
be use.
(3) 100% equipment back up
(4) Verify data input- ensure latest revision &
comparison between pre lay survey and
TOPO Data.
(5) Approved Anchor Pattern prior to start
work
(6) Stop the activity if system malfunction

Prior to start
work

(9) Unfit and incompetent barge


and tugboat anchor running team

B3 B5 B4 B5 (1) Ensure the team is medically fit for the


task with a valid Smart Card
(2) Adequate skill, experience and
knowledge
(3) Competency certificate
(4) Assessing competency of the crews
(5) Regularly random Drug & Alcohol check

(1) OCS, BF,


MC, AHT

Prior to start
work

(1) Wrong engineering


(2) Adverse weather
(3) Miscommmunication
(4) Equipment failure
(5) Malfunction of Davits, pneumo
hoses and gauges

C1 C3 C4 C4 (1) Follow as per approved engineering


procedure
(2) Weather watch on standby
(3) Refer to single focal point and use
common language
(4) Equipment function test and Certificate
(5) Monitor pressure
(6) Specific JSA, PTW
(7) PMS
(8) Include soak test for hoses into
Installation procedure

OCS, Div Supv, Prior to start


BF, FE,CE
work

Page 11 of 13

RISK RATING
AFTER

(1) OCS, BF,


MC, AHT

Prior to start
work

STATUS

CONSTRUCTION RISK ASSESSMENT


PROJECT

PROVISION OF TRANSPORTATION AND INSTALLATION OF OFFSHORE FACILITIES FOR SKO PIPELINE REPLACEMENT

SESSION DATE

ACTIVITY

RISER INSTALLATION - PL 369

18 August 2011

LOCATION

BARAM FIELD

DESCRIPTION OF ACTIVITIES

NO

Activities

RISK ISSUES

Location

1) Barge Setup
2) Pipeline pick-up
3) Barge side walk

4) Diver metrology
5) Install new riser clamp
6) Install new riser

CONSEQUENCES

CAUSES

RISK RATING
BEFORE
P

MITIGATION MEASURES

TECo Office

ACTION PARTY

DUE DATE

Barge Side-walk

(R3)Pipe buckle

(1) Property damage


(2) Schedule impact
(3) Cost impact

(1) Adverse weather


(2) Miscommmunication
(3) Equipment failure
(4) pneumo hose entangle
(5) Malfunction of Davits, pneumo
and gauges.

C1 C2 C3 C3 (1) Weather watch on standby


(2) Refer to single focal point and use
common language
(3) Equipment function test and certificate
(4) Monitor pressure

OCS, Div Supv, Prior to start


BF, FE
work

Diver metrology

(R4) Drop object on diver

(1) Personnel injury

(1) Communication failure

B4 B2 B4 B4 (1) Refer to single focal point and use


common language
(2) Weather watch on standby
(3) 100% backup on BMS
(4) Experince diver to perform the job
(5) Follow approved procedure and design
(6) Specific JSA and PTW

OCS, Div Supv, Prior to start


BF, FE
work

(2)
Schedule impact
(3) Cost impact
(4) Damage equipment

Install new riser


clamp

(R5) Wrong measurement

(1) Schedule impact


(2) Cost impact

(R6) Diver hit by riser clamp


during setup
(R7) Injury during water jet
cleaning
(R8) Hand pinch
(R9) Drop object on diver

(1) Personnel injury

(2) Adverse weather


(3) Poor visibility
(4) Inexperience Diver
(5) Entanglement or entrapment of
diver
umbilical
(1)
Poor
visibility
B1 B1 B2 B3 (1) 100% backup on BMS
(2) Inexperience Diver
(2) Experince diver to perform the job
(3) Wrong engineering calculation
(3) Follow approved procedure and design

(1) Communication failure

B4 B2 B4 B4 (1) Refer to single focal point and use


common language
(2) Platform to provide information regarding
fire water puimp facility
(3) Platform sum pump in manual mode
during diving activity
(4) Inform OIM prior diving activity.
(5) Approved size and length of High
pressure water jet nozzle
(6) Weather watch on standby
(7) Specific JSA and PTW

(2)
Schedule impact
(3) Cost impact

(2) Not following procedure


(3) Adverse weather

Page 12 of 13

RISK RATING
AFTER

OCS, Div Supv,


BF, FE

OIM, OCS, Div


Supv, BF, FE

Prior to start
work

STATUS

CONSTRUCTION RISK ASSESSMENT


PROJECT

PROVISION OF TRANSPORTATION AND INSTALLATION OF OFFSHORE FACILITIES FOR SKO PIPELINE REPLACEMENT

SESSION DATE

ACTIVITY

RISER INSTALLATION - PL 369

18 August 2011

LOCATION

BARAM FIELD

DESCRIPTION OF ACTIVITIES

NO

Activities

RISK ISSUES

Location

1) Barge Setup
2) Pipeline pick-up
3) Barge side walk

CONSEQUENCES

4) Diver metrology
5) Install new riser clamp
6) Install new riser

CAUSES

RISK RATING
BEFORE
P

Install new riser

(R10) Rigging failure during


lifting and lowering of tie-in
spool

(1) Personnel injury/fatality


(2) Property damage
(3) Cost impact
(4) Schedule impact

(1) Lifting sling failure

TECo Office

MITIGATION MEASURES

ACTION PARTY

R
BF, RF, Div
Prior to start
Supv, FE, MWS, work
Crane Op

(2) Correct rigging practices


(2) Riser lifting Clamp slipped
(3)
Keep clear of any suspended load all the
time
(4) Properly barricade and signages the area
(5) Final inspection as per approved drawing
prior to lifting by concern parties
(6) Conduct lifting slings and shackles
inspection
(7) Sea state limitation for lifting shall be
reffered
(8) Specific JSA and PTW

(4) Adverse weather


(5) Crane failure
(6) Under rated rigging equipment

Page 13 of 13

RISK RATING
AFTER
P

B4 B2 B4 B4 (1) Check SWL of sling & inspection


certificate valid

(3) Standing below suspended


load

DUE DATE

STATUS