Default Motion by CES in Re Strunk V Jeffries Et Al. NYCPLR Article 78 - Petition 21948-12 W MOL W Exhibits

Hakeem Jeffries 35 Underhill Avenue, #2A -- Brooklyn, NY 11238
Grace Meng of 14714 34th Avenue -- Flushing, NY 11354

Felix Ortiz 189 B 33rd Street -- Brooklyn, NY 11232
Bill DeBlasio of 442 11th Street -- Brooklyn, NY 11215
Walter Cooper 150 West 96th Street, #I2G -- New York, NY 10025
Keith L.T. Wright of 2225 Fifth Avenue -- New York, NY 10037
Christine C. Quinn of 263 Ninth Avenue, #3A -- New York, NY 10001
William Thompson of 106 West 121st Street -- New York, NY 10027
Scott Stringer of 155 West 71st Street, #3A -- New York, NY 10023
Emily Giske of 440 West 24th Street -- New York, NY 10014
Anne Marie Anzalone 2827 48th Street -- Astoria, NY 11103
Archie Spigner of 11210 175th Street -- Jamaica, NY 11433
George Gresham 1313 East 233rd Street -- Bronx, NY 10466
Ruben Diaz, Jr. of 820 Boyton Avenue, #6D -- Bronx, NY 10473
Ken Jenkins 108 Bushey Avenue -- Yonkers, NY 10710
Mario Cilento 3 Isabel Road -- Orangeburg, NY 10962
Gerald D. Jennings of 1135 New Scotland Road -- Albany, NY 12208
Byron Brown 14 Blaine Street -- Buffalo, NY 14208
Robert Duffy 164 Croydon Road -- Rochester, NY 14610
Joseph Morelle of 133 Deerfield Drive -- Rochester, NY 14609
Scott Adams of 11 Poplar Avenue -- Orchard Park, NY 14127
Stephanie Miner 102 Woodside Drive -- Syracuse, NY 13224
Steve Bellone 107 Vanderbilt Avenue -- West Babylon, NY 11704
Irene Stein 101 Brandywine Drive -- Ithaca, NY 14850
Sheila Comar 29 Depot Street -- Middle Granville, NY 12849; and
Kirsten Gillibrand with DC Office 478 Russell Washington, DC 20510
County District Attorneys:
William J. Fitzpatrick District Attorney Onondaga County DA's Office
Criminal Courts Building - 4th Floor 505 South State Street Syracuse, NY 1320
Kenneth Thompson District Attorney Kings County District Attorney's Office
350 Jay Street Brooklyn, New York, NY 11201
Robert T. Johnson District Attorney The Office of the Bronx County District Attorney
198 East 161st Street Bronx, NY 10451
Sandra Doorley District Attorney Monroe County District Attorney's Office.
47 South Fitzhugh Street Rochester, NY 14614
Francis D. Phillips District Attorney Office of the Orange County District Attorney
40 Matthews Street Goshen, NY 10924
Cyrus R. Vance, Jr. District Attorney The New York County District Attorney's Office
One Hogan Place New York, NY 10013
Janet DiFiore District Attorney Office of Westchester District Attorney

111 Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. Blvd. White Plains, New York 10601
Thomas J. Spota District Attorney Suffolk County District Attorney's Office
North County Complex - Building 77 Veterans Memorial Highway Hauppauge, NY 11788
Frank A. Sedita, I11 District Attorney Erie County District Attorney's Office
25 Delaware Avenue Buffalo, New York 14202
P. David Soares District Attorney Erie County District Attorney's Ofice
25 Delaware Avenue Buffalo, New York 14202
Madeline Singas District Attorney Office of Nassau County District Attorney
262 Old Country Road Mineola, NY 11501
Kevin C. Kortright District Attorney Office Of The Washington County District Attorney
Municipal Center Building C - 383 Broadway Fort Edward, New York 12828
Gwen Wilkinson District Attorney Office of Tompkins County District Attorney
320 North Tioga Street Ithaca, New York 14850
Richard A. Brown District Attorney Queens County District Attorney's Office
125-01 Queens Boulevard Kew Gardens, New York 11415
Parties in Interest
Andrew M. Cuomo 138 Eagle Street -- Albany, NY 12202
Tom DiNapoli 100 Great Neck Road -- Great Neck, NY 11201
Eric Schneiderman 645 West End Avenue, #8F -- New York, NY 10025
Sheldon Silver of 550 Grand Street, #5A -- New York, NY 10002
Arthur M. Schack J.S.C. 360 Adams Street Brooklyn New York 11201
Preet Bharara U.S. Attorney SDNY 1 St. Andrews Plaza New York, NY, 10007
Loretta E. Lynch U.S. Attorney EDNY 271 Cadman Plaza East Brooklyn NY 11201
William J. Hochul, Jr. U.S. Attorney WDNY 138 Delaware Avenue Buffalo, NY 14202
Richard S. Hartunian U.S. Attorney NDNY P.O. Box 7198 100 South Clinton Street
Syracuse, NY 13261-7198
Strunk v Jeffries et al. Article 78 NYSSC for Kings County Index No.: 21948-2012
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
FOR THE COUNTY OF KINGS
-----------------------------------------------------------------------x
Index No.: 21948 / 2012

Hon David I Schmidt J.S.C.
Christopher-Earl : Strunk in esse Sui juris

Petitioner,
-againstHakeem Jeffries , Grace Meng, Felix Ortiz, Bill DeBlasio,
Walter Cooper, Keith L.T. Wright, Christine C. Quinn,
William Thompson, Scott Stringer, Emily Giske,
Anne Marie Anzalone, Archie Spigner, George Gresham,
Ruben Diaz, Jr.; Ken Jenkins; Mario Cilento;
Gerald D. Jennings; Byron Brown ; Robert Duffy;
PETITIONERS AFFIDAVIT
Joseph Morelle; Scott Adams; Stephanie Miner; Steve Bellone;
FOR FAILURE TO REVIEW THE
IN SUPPORT OF DEFAULT
JUDGMENT OF ELECTOR BODY
Irene Stein; Sheila Comar; and Kirsten Gillibrand

Respondents.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------x
STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF KINGS
FACTS AT TRIAL NOW NEEDS

REFERRAL TO GRAND JURY
)
) ss.
)
Accordingly, I, Christopher-Earl: Strunk in esse, being duly sworn, depose and say under penalty of perjury:
1. That as directed by the Court on 24 November 2014 to file a motion for default judgment under
CPLR 3215(a)(b) before the pre-trial conference schedule on 26 March 2015, this is Petitioners affidavit
in support of his motion for a default Judgment as to each State Officers failure to appear after service of
the Petition and Note of Issue with Notice of readiness for trial of the facts as to use of false instruments
ineligibility of Barack Hussein Obama II to serve as President of the United States (POTUS) before the
December 17, 2012 electoral college vote by the 2012 New York State Electoral College Electors for
New Yorks choice for the office of President [and Vice President] of the United States (POTUS); and
2.
Defaulters are those who were then and/or current State Officer(s), who more than just private
citizen electors, have a constitutional duty under state law, then as now with the exception of Keith L.T.
Wright and Felix Ortiz represented by Joshua Pepper NYS Assistant Attorney General (AAG) and Mario
Petitioners Motion for Default Judgment as to NYS Electors et al Page 1 of 6
Cilento represented by Steven C. Farkas Esq., include: Hakeem Jeffries , Grace Meng, Bill DeBlasio,
Christine C. Quinn, William Thompson, Scott Stringer, Emily Giske, Anne Marie Anzalone, Archie
Spigner, George Gresham, Ruben Diaz, Jr.; Ken Jenkins; Gerald D. Jennings; Byron Brown; Robert
Duffy; Joseph Morelle; Scott Adams ; Stephanie Miner; Steve Bellone; Irene Stein; Sheila Comar; and as
necessary parties are Arthur M. Schack JSC, Governor Cuomo, Attorney General Schniederman,
Assemblyman Silver, and Controller DiNapoli to be barred from holding public office when after trial on
the facts put before this court under CPLR 4317(b) would then as a Mandamus at least require
administrative action by Court reference of the findings at trial to the respective District Attorney from
where each Elector and US Senator is domiciled for further action including to the US Attorney for each
District and at the discretion of the Court incidental relief for Petitioner as to the wrongful levy of States
court costs by Justice Schack in the case Strunk v NYS BOE etaol. Index No. 6500-2011 without a trial of
the facts therein stated as germane therein and herein.
3. That the doctrine of exhaustion of administrative remedies from October 2008 thru November 19,
2012 was met when the final determination on November 6, 2012 required notice of criminal complaint
for Court review by trial of the facts to be done with findings referral for further action.
4. That on 9 November 2012 Petitioner filed with various County District Attorneys the criminal
complaint along with notice of intent to file an Article 78 by OSC on 19 November 2012 (see Exhibit 1).
5. That on 14 November 2012 Petitioner filed and served by Certified Mail an Article 78 with a
notice of intent to file an OSC as upon the State at each Respondents domicile (see Exhibit 2).
6. That on 16 November 2012, in response to the States receipt of the 9 November notice shown as
Exhibit 1 to Governor Cuomo, Attorney General Schniederman, Assemblyman Silver, and Controller
DiNapoli, The Assistant Attorney General Pepper wrote a letter to the clerk opposing the filing of an OSC
and or Petition as to Governor Andrew M. Cuomo, Attorney General Eric Schniederman, Assemblyman
Sheldon Silver, and Controller Thomas DiNapoli (see Exhibit 3).
7. As a matter of Judicial Notice, Petitioner is a pre-1933 private national citizen of the United States
versus a public US Citizen who was registered to vote at the November 6, 2012 and voted at the General
Election at which all, except for Kirsten Gillibrand, of the Respondents are Presidential Electors
("Electors"), were appointment to cast votes for President and Vice President in accordance with Election
Law 12-100 and despite have been given administrative due notice on or about 9 November 2012 of a
criminal complaint with fourteen district attorneys' offices charging the Electors with aiding and abetting
a crime, with copies sent to the 29 electors elect including the Governor, Speaker of the Assembly,
Controller, Attorney General, with due warning that were any to vote for the re-election of the defacto
usurper SOEBARKAH (aka Barry Soetoro, AKA Barack Hussein Obama II aka Barack Obama)
president of the United States (POTUS) each would be guilty of aiding and abetting a felony, sedition and
treason; after the notice of 9 November 2012 all Electors failed to review the facts of the crime at trial for
which they have been warned as to their being as State officers accessory to; and nevertheless proceeded
on December 17 to cast their vote for the slate now having committed high crimes.
8. That the November 14, 2012 Petition with Index 21948/12 shown as exhibit 2 is done to obtain
a. a trial of the facts of the forgery done by the as yet named perpetrators on or about 25 April
2011 that appears done for the express purpose of re-usurping the office of POTUS in support
of high crimes including treason in regards to Benghazi; and
b. that all except two of the Electors elect are also public officials with duties as Electors that are
incompatible with their duties as State public officials, however with notice are culpable;
c. further that under A2S1C2 the NYS Legislature has exclusive power to create the New York
Electoral College, with the proviso that it shall not attempt or instruct or allow any person
serving on the Electoral College representative also of New York State with an oath of office
to change the eligibility and or qualifications of a federal officer including POTUS; and
d. that Petitioner also sought to void the U.S. Senate election of Kirsten Gillibrand, who was not
an Elector; nevertheless was served 9 November notice on the US Senator who is culpable.
9. That Petition and relief sought is done notwithstanding the fact that the defacto President Barack
Obama had already admitted that his father is a British Subject married to his then minor aged U.S.
Citizen mother on his own 2008 campaign website is not a natural-born citizen but a native-born citizen
as if defined under the 14th Amendment United States, on November 19, 2012 Petitioner submitted an
application for an OSC inter alia for restraint and declaratory judgment as to incompatibility of classes of
29 electors that was declined to be signed by Justice Schmidt on November 19, 2012; and however was
on November 19, 2012 duly served by Certified Mail upon Electors domicile followed on November 30,
2012 by regular first class mail received at the domicile of each Elector (see Exhibit 4) and then
10. In that neither chamber had replied to Petitioners challenge to errors in the order and or bar to
further action instead Justice Schack had the Clerk of the court questionably add the NYC Board of
Elections without notice; as such on December 7, 2012, Petitioner filed his Note of Issue with Certificate
of Readiness for trial duly served upon caption parties including Joshua Pepper, AAG for his clients and
including the unnamed state officers Governor Cuomo, Attorney General Schniederman, Assembkyman
Silver, and Controller DiNapoli (see Exhibit 5).
11. That all the Electors Voted for the usurper Obama and the US Senator did not challenge the vote
in the Senate are ALL accessory after the fact of a crime and some since 2008 before the fact.
12. It is an irrefutable fact that the defacto President Obama has used a forged instrument as if his
birth certificate to re-usurp the office of POTUS and were the NYS Electoral College members having
been duly notified who voted for such usurpation they are guilty as an accessory after the fact to the
forgery crime and before the fact of criminal usurpation, and that there has never been a trial of such facts
heard before any court on the merits of the evidence anywhere in the country.
13. No court has ever heard the facts of the 2011 forgery crime and or ruled on the merits of such.
14. That on October 21, 2012, I first heard facts associated with the forged 25 April 2011 instrument
from Paul Edward Irey, who at my request affirmed the first affidavit shown in Exhibit 5 (A-2).
15. That the misprison of a felony with sedition and treason are both state and federal matters, and
Petitioner relies upon the knowledge, experience and expertise of Sherrif Joe Arpaio, his chief
investigator Mike Zullo , Paul Edward. Irey, and as of 9 March 2015, the Viscount, Christopher Walter
Monckton PhD. too, and that the charge of misprision of treason applies herein State Court as to the 2012
New York Electoral College as a Federal misprision of treason mandate under 18 USC 2382 (1) .
16. That on 9 March 2015, Viscount Monckton agreed to testify herein as to his mathematical model
proof that the false instruments presented by the POTUS and his agents are forgeries (see Exhibit 6.)
17. That on 24 November 2014, I presented a bound evidence package under seal to the Court along
with twenty five subpoenas for signature; and I request that the Court sign the subpoena for the
appearance of Lord Monckton for his travel to testify at the inquest trial here in Court on a date to be
rescheduled for after 26 March 2015 with the understanding that with such a subpoena the US State
Department will not deny a visa.
18. That Petitioner has never requested a default judgment relief before nor is anyone else to benefit.
Wherefore, Petitioner wishes the Court to order a default judgment as to each Respondent and order
a certain new date for a inquest trial on the facts presented herein with notice to be served upon the 14
County District Attorneys served with the criminal complaint on or after 9 November 2012 and or at least
that Kings County District Attorney Ken Thompson and or his agent attend the inquest and that:
a. An inquest hearing will be on the issues of facts as to forgery, sedition and treason.
b. That based upon a review of the facts associated with the forgery of public documents to
facilitate usurpation of the office of POTUS that Electors be given notice of their being held
1
18 U.S. Code 2381 Treason Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States, levies war against them or
adheres to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort within the United States or elsewhere, is guilty of
treason and shall suffer death, or shall be imprisoned not less than five years and fined under this title but not
less than $10,000; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States.
18 U.S. Code 2382 - Misprision of treason (Pub. L. 113-86, except 113-79.) Whoever, owing allegiance to
the United States and having knowledge of the commission of any treason against them, conceals and does not,
as soon as may be, disclose and make known the same to the President or to some judge of the United States,
or to the governor or to some judge or justice of a particular State, is guilty of misprision of treason and shall
be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than seven years, or both. (emphasis by Petitioner)
as an accessory after the fact to a forgery crime that would be referred for criminal
proceeding.
c. That based upon a review of the facts associated with the allegation of misprision of felony
sedition and treason that Electors be given notice of their being held as an accessory after the
fact to a felony and sedition and warned of treason per se crime that would be referred for
criminal proceeding and or for seating of a Grand Jury.
d. And for further and different relief including review of incidental damage as the Court may
deem necessary herein.
Petitioner has read this application for Default Judgment relief along with an inquest trial of the facts for
relief along with other and different relief for justice herein; as the same is true to my own knowledge,
except as to the matters therein stated to be alleged on information and belief, and as to those matters I
believe it to be true. The grounds of my beliefs as to all matters not stated upon information and belief are
as follows: 3rdparties, books and records, and personal knowledge.
A-Yp
CHRISTOPHER-EARL: STRUNK
Sworn to before me
day of March 201 5
This
//
bl TJGWS
HUGGINS
-Notag pa ijc, State of New York
No.:IlHU6103403
Quailfled ~n Klngs County
Comrn~ss~on
Exp~resDec. 29. 2
Petitioner's Motion for Default Judgment as to NYS Electors et a1 Page 6 of 6

-----------------------------------------------------------------------x
Index No.: 21948 / 2012


593 Vanderbilt Avenue 281 Brooklyn New York 11238
Petitioner,

Respondents.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------x

Exhibit 1
NEW YORK STATE SUPREME COURT

Christopher Earl Strunk in esse
Petitioner
v.
1.
2.
3.

4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.

12. Eric Schneiderman 645 West End Avenue, #8F -- New York, NY 10025
13. Walter Cooper 150 West 96th Street, #I2G -- New York, NY 10025
14. Sheldon Silver of 550 Grand Street, #5A -- New York, NY 10002
15. Keith L.T. Wright of 2225 Fifth Avenue -- New York, NY 10037
16. Christine C. Quinn of 263 Ninth Avenue, #3A -- New York, NY 10001
17. William Thompson of 106 West 121st Street -- New York, NY 10027
18. Scott Stringer of 155 West 71st Street, #3A -- New York, NY 10023
19. Emily Giske of 440 West 24th Street -- New York, NY 10014
20. Scott Adams of 11 Poplar Avenue -- Orchard Park, NY 14127
21.
22.
23.
24.

26.
27.
28.
29.

Sheila Comar 29 Depot Street -- Middle Granville, NY 12849

25. Archie Spigner of 11210 175th Street -- Jamaica, NY 11433
Respondents
NOTICE OF INTENT TO FILE AN ARTICLE 78 PETITION WITH AN ORDER TO SHOW
CAUSE APPLICATION FOR A PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION PENDING A
DECLARATORY JUDGMENT ON ISSUES OF LAW AS TO ELECTORS
Please take notice of Petitioners intent to file an order to show cause application at the Kings
County Supreme Court Building at 11 AM on the 10th Floor intake at 360 Adams Street on Monday
November 19, 2012 for a preliminary injunction relief pending a declaratory judgment on issues of
law; e.g., Are public officers to be held liable as accessories to felonies in usurpation of Office of
POTUS and Ballot access? Are public officers presented with the facts of Barack Obama ineligibility
able to change qualifications before the Electoral College Vote scheduled December 15, 2012?
For further information Contact :
Christopher-Earl: Strunk in esse

593 Vanderbilt Avenue - 281
Brooklyn New York 11238
Cellphone: 845-901-6767
Email: chris@strunk.ws
CERTIFIED RETURN RECEIPT # 70 101870000042924382
STATE OF NEW YORK
)
)
COUNTY OF KINGS
1.
Christopher,-Earl: Strunk in esse

Email: c h r i s @ s e _ . w s
88.
Accordingly, I, Christopher-Earl: Strunk in esse being duly sworn, depose and say under penalty of perjury:
COMPLAINT OF ATTEMPT TO COMMIT A CRIME BY A PUBLIC OFFICER WITH NOTICE OF INTENT TO
REQUEST AN INJUNCTION IN KINGS COUNTY WITH DECLARATORY RELIEF AS TO ELECTORS
Gwen Wilkinson District Attorney
Office of Tompkins County District Attorney
320 North Tioga Street
Ithaca, New York 14850
Based upon information and belief, Irene Stein of 101 Brandywine Drive -- Ithaca, NY 14850 is the 2012 Democratic Party candidate for Elector as part
of the slate for Barack Obama and Joe Biden at the State of New York November 6,2012 General Election for choosing New York's candidate for the
office of President and Vice President of the United States (POTUS) by their vote cast by December 15,2012; and that such Public Officers are to
participate as a member of the State of New York electoral college intending to vote for Barack Obama as if mandated by the State of New York
legislature with exclusive power afforded by Article 2 Section 1 of the U.S. Constitution with use of New York State Election Law and related rules,
McPherson v. Blacker, 146 U.S. 1 (1892), with the proviso that no Public Official may change the eligibility and or qualification requirements of a
federal officer including office of POTUS, U.S. Term Limits. Inc. v. Thornton, 514 U.S. 779 (1995).
That in addition to the foregoing, Affirmant based upon information and belief contends that Barack Obama is guilty of forgery, spoliation, concealment
intimidation of witnesses and racketeering in the matter of his alleged Common Law citizen status as if a Native-born Citizen notwithstanding the
allegiance status of his parents rather than a Natural Law Natural-born Citizen born on soil to married US citizen parents, nevertheless is a British
Subject with dual allegiance at birth wherever that was to the minor US Citizen mother in wedlock to a majori aged British subject foreign alien
student who then were duly divorced on March 20, 1964; and then when in the mother's custody during her 2"'rnarriage Barack Obama was adopted in
Indonesia by his Indonesian Citizen step-father, Lolo Soetoro, who gave the name "SOEBARKAH" according to the U.S. State Department record
affirmed on the August 13, 1968 by Stanley Ann Soetoro; and thereafter as an Indonesian Citizen SOEBARKAH (aka Barry Soetoro) reentered the USA
in 1971 alone without a US Passport to live with his grandmother who obtained foreign student funding, illegally obtained a stolen Social Security
Number no later than 1980, forged a Selective Service filing dated 1980, and inter alia in furtherance of usurpation of the office of POTUS no later than
April 25,201 1, according to more than three experts, forged a Long Form Certificate of Birth as if of Hawaii.
'
.
*-
That notwithstanding the citizenship status of Barack Obama, Affirmant contends that Barack Obama has multiple allegiances despite taking an oath .
owing exclusive allegiance to the United States, levies war against the People of the-United States, adheres to their enemies al-Qaida, Muslim
Brotherhood, Hamas, Hezbollah, GuLEN Movement and Iran against the People of the United States to establish the Caliphate from Thailand through
Morocco, giving them aid and comfort within the United States or elsewhere, is guilty of treason; and that any candidate elector and or public officer
including Irene Stein who would aid and abet Barack Obama in usurpation of office of POTUS is no less than guilty of misprision of felony, sedition and
treason. .
Based upon the foregoing subject there is a preponderance of evidence proving that the April 25,201 1 forged public document is for the purpose of
usurping the POTUS, and that were any New York State Public Officer Electors to cast a vote aiding abetting each crime the civil servant would be an
accessory after the fact to a felony under New York Penal Law; and as such Affirmant provides due notice hereby as a matter of standing guaranteed by
the U.S. Constitution, NYS Constitution, 18 U.S.C. $ 2381 through $2390 and related law, including but not limited to N.Y.S. Election Law $ 16-100,
N.Y.S. CPLR tj 7202 and N.Y.S. Civil Service Law $ 105 as applies to any public officer misapplication and administration of laws; the same is true to
my own knowledge, except as to the matters therein stated to be alleged on information and belief, and as to those matters I believe it to be true. The
grounds of my beliefs as to all matters not stated upon information and belief are as follows: 31d parties, books and records, and personal knowledge.
\.'......
Sworn to before.&& #QY[ $:.$2012

This -day $' Npe*. e r 2G-i2 "-.,
. .
: . - \I
> ..< .-.
-
p.
'
. *
-.
..
.
.
;.
..,
,&~y
2
ZVIJ MDIO
Cc: Irene Stein
of w y d
PUBLIC,
No. 0
1
1
~
Q u a l i i In Kin!$ CouW
Commission Expir'es Februaly 28,2015
Brandywine Drive -- Ithaca,
.;:
.,
CERTIFIED RETURN RECEIPT # 701010000068748706

STATE OF NEW YORK
)
)
COUNTY OF KINGS
Christopher,-Earl: Strunk in esse

Email: chris@stmnk.ws
88.
'
Kevin C. Kortright District Attorney
Office Of The Washington County District Attorney
Municipal Center Building C - 383 Broadway
Fort Edward, New York 12828
Based upon information and belief, Sheila Comar of 29 Depot Street -- Middle Granville, NY 12849 is the 2012 Democratic Party candidate for Elector
as part of the slate for Barack Obarna and Joe Biden at the State of New York November 6,201 2 General Election for choosing New York's candidate
for the office of President and Vice President of the United States (POTUS) by their vote cast by December 15,2012; and that such Public Officers are to
legislature with exclusive power afforded by Article 2 Section 1 of the U.S. Constit&on with use of New York State Election Law and related rules,
student who then w e n duly divorced on March 20, 1964; and then when in the mother's custody during her 2"'marriage
Barack Obama was adopted in
affirmed on the August 13, 1968 by Stanley Ann Soetoro; and thereafter as an Indonesian Citizen SOEBARKAH (aka Bany Soetoro) reentered the USA
That notwithstanding the citizenship status of Barack Obama, Affirmant contends that Barack Obarna has multiple allegiances despite taking an oath owing exclusive allegiance to the United States, levies war against the People of the United States, adheres to their enemies al-Qaida, Muslim
Brotherhood, Hamas, Hezbollah, GULEN Movement and Iran against the People of <he United States to establish the Caliphate from Thailand through
including Sheila Comar who would aid and abet Barack Obama in usurpation of office of POTUS is no less than guilty of misprision of felony, sedition
and treason.
the U.S. Constitution, NYS Constitution, 18 U.S.C. Ej 2381 through $2390 and related law, including but not limited to N.Y.S. Election Law $ 16-100,
N.Y.S. CPLR Ej 7202 and N.Y.S. Civil Service Law Ej 105 as applies to any public officer misapplication and administration of laws; the same is true to
grounds of my beliefs as to all matters not stated upon information and belief are as follows: 3'* parties, books and records, and personal knowledge.
.
,. .. ..
'2-.?sf2
Sworn to beforeQj@@!
id^^.
This -day e$ >Mveinber -2612:-,
:.-I
+.
cmpher-~arl : Strunk
Cc: Sheila Comar 29 Depot Street -- Middle Granville, NY 12849
I
-
C1

593 Vanderbilt Avenue - 28 1

STATE OF NEW YORK
)
) 88.
COUNTY OF KINGS
Kathleen M. Rice District Attorney
Office of Nassau County District Attorney
262 Old Country Road
Mineola, NY 11501
Based upon information and belief, Tom DiNapoli of 100 Great Neck Road -- Great Neck, NY 11201 is the 2012 Democratic Party candidate for Elector
as part of the slate for Barack Obama and Joe Biden at the State of New York November 6, 2012 General Election for choosing New York's candidate
federal officer including office of POTUS, US. Term Limits.Inc. v. Thornton, 514 U.S. 779 (1995).
student who then were duly divorced on March 20, 1964; and then when in the mother's custody during her 2n'marriage Barack Obama was adopted in
Indonesia by his Indonesian Citizen step-father, Lolo Soetoro, who gave the name "SOEBARKAH according to the U.S. State Department record
April 25, 201 1, according to more than three experts, forged a Long Form Certificate of Birth as if of Hawaii.
owing exclusive allegiance to the United States, levies war against the People of the United States, adheres to their enemies alQaida, Muslim
Brotherhood, Hamas, Hezbollah, GULEN Movement and Iran against the People of the United States to establish the Caliphate from Thailand through
including Tom DiNapoli who would aid and abet Barack Obama in usurpation of office of POTUS is no less than guilty of misprision of felony, sedition
and treason.
the U.S. Constitution, NYS Constitution, 18 U.S.C. jj 2381 through $2390 and related law, including but not limited to N.Y.S. Election Law jj 16-100,
N.Y.S. CPLR jj 7202 and N.Y.S. Civil Service Law jj 105 as applies to any public officer misapplication and administration of laws; the same is true to
grounds of my beliefs as to all matters not stated upon information and belief are as follows: 3'd parties, books and records, and personal knowledge.
,...
-.
..
Sworn to befopS.4~' .:.$y: .i~." !?
~ 8. 1 25-5
>
7;. --
.- >-
-.
( ; s i :
:
.,_-.
I-.
---- -
2-;
Christopher-Earl: Strunk
---
NI J.INDIG
PUBLIC,state of NewYork
: \.-.NO.OlIN6230559
;...-.
,,?: ..3 ~ u a rini~ingscounty 2016 CC: Tom DiNapoli 100 Gnat Neck Road
Februay
..~Mssicn
.-....___....".' -
-'?.',;a 1 --.
*, .
Notary
.&*Y
----.
- . -
-,>
-- Great Neck, NY
11201
i
:
<

STATE OF NEW YORK
)
)
COUNTY 0.F KINGS

593 ~anderbiltAvenue - 28 1
88.
P. David Soares District Attorney

Erie County District Attorney's Ofice
25 Delaware Avenue
Buffalo, New York 14202
Based upon information and belief, Andrew M. Cuomo of 138 Eagle Street -- Albany, NY 12202 and Gerald D. Jennings of 1135 New Scotland Road -Albany, NY 12208 are the 2012 Democratic Party candidate for Elector as part of the slate for Barack Obama and Joe Biden at the State of New York
November 6,2012 General Election for choosing New York's candidate for the office of President and Vice President of the United States (POTUS) by
their vote cast by December 15,2012; and that such Public Officers are to participate as a member of the State of New York electoral college intending
to vote for Barack Obama as if mandated by the State of New York legislature with exclusive power afforded by Article 2 Section 1 of the U.S.
Constitution with use of New York State Election Law and related rules, McPherson v. Blacker, 146 U.S. 1 (1892), with the proviso that no Public
Official may change the eligibility and or qualification requirements of a federal officer including office of POTUS, U.S.Term Limits. Inc. v. Thornton, 514 U.S. 779 (1995).
affirmed on the August 13, 1968 by Stanley Ann Soetoro; and thereafter as aq Indonesian Citizen SOEBARKAH (aka Bany Soetoro) reentered the USA
That notwithstanding the citizenship status of Barack Obama, Affirmant contends that Barack Obama has multiple allegiances despite taking an oath
owing exclusive allegiance to the United States, levies war against the People of the United States, adheres to their enemies al-Qaida, Muslim
Brotherhood, Harnas, Hezbollah, GijLEN Movement and Iran against the People of the United States to establish the Caliphate from Thailand through
including Andrew M. Cuomo and Gerald D. Jennings who would aid and abet Barack Obama in usurpation of office of POTUS is no less than guilty of
misprision of felony, sedition and treason.
the U.S. Constitution, NYS Constitution, 18 U.S.C. # 2381 through 82390 and related law, including but not limited to N.Y.S. Election Law 8 16-100,
N.Y.S. CPLR 8 7202 and N.Y.S. Civil Service Law 105 as applies to any public officer misapplication and administration of laws; the same is true to
grounds of my beliefs as to all matters not stated upon information and belief are as follows: 3rdparties, books and records, and personal knowledge.
~ h r i s t o ~ h e r - ~ aStrunk
rl:
i,
'
'

STATE OF NEW YORK
)
)
COUNTY OF KINGS
88.
Frank A. Sedita, I11 District Attorney
Erie County District Attorney's Office
25 Delaware Avenue
Buffalo, New York 14202
Based upon information and belief, Byron Brown of 14 Blaine Street -- Buffalo, NY 14208 is the 2012 Democratic Party candidate for Elector as part of
the slate for Barack Obama and Joe Biden at the State of New York November 6,2012 General Election for choosing New York's candidate for the
ofice of President and Vice President of the United States (POTUS) by their vote cast by December 15,2012; and that such Public Officers are to
McPherson v. Blacker, 146 U.S. 1 (1 892), with the proviso that no Public Official may change the eligibility and or qualification requirements of a
federal officer including office of POTUS, U.S. Term Limits, Inc. v. Thornton, 5 14 U.S. 779 (1995).
That notwithstanding the citizenship status of Barack Obama, Affirrnant contends that Barack Obama has multiple allegiances despite taking an oath
including Byron Brown who would aid and abet Barack Obama in usurpation of office of POTUS is no less than guilty of misprision of felony, sedition
and treason.
a c c e s o b after the fact to a felony under New York Penal Law; and as such Affirmant provides due notice hereby as a matter of standing guaranteed by
the U.S. Constitution, NYS Constitution, 18 U.S.C. $2381 through $2390 and related law, including but not limited to N.Y.S. Election Law $ 16-100,
N.Y.S. CPLR $7202 and N.Y.S. Civil Service Law 5 105 as applies to any public officer misapplication and administration of laws; the same is true to
LI....
....
_ ,
,.*-.
sworn to befws5@ I{g.yl'@

$231
This -dagof ? d ~-f <r .?O 1&
.: : < *
. " -. .
a&
Christopher-Earl: Stmnk in esse

593 ~ander6iltAvenue - 28 1
CERTIFIED RETURN RECEIPT # 70 10 1870000042924399

STATE OF NEW YORK
)
) 88.
COUNTYOF KINGS
Accordingly, I, ~ h r i s t o ~ h e r - ~ aStrunk
r l : in esse being duly sworn, depose and say under penalty of perjury:

Thomas J. Spota District Attorney
Suffolk County District Attorney's Office
North County Complex - Building 77 Veterans Memorial Highway
Hauppauge, NY 11788
Based upon information and belief, Steve Bellone of 107 Vanderbilt Avenue -- West Babylon, NY 11704 is the 2012 Democratic Party candidate for
Elector as part of the slate for Barack Obama and Joe Biden at the State of New York November 6,2012 General Election for choosing New York's
candidate for the office of President and Vice President of the United States (POTUS) by their vote cast by December 15,2012; and that such Public
Officers are to participate as a member of the State of New York electoral college intending to vote for Barack Obarna as if mandated by the State of
New York legislature with exclusive power afforded by Article 2 Section 1 of the U.S. Constitution with use of New York State Election Law and related
rules, McPherson v. Blacker, 146 U.S. 1 (1892), with the proviso that no Public Official may change the eligibility and or qualification requirements of a
allegiance status of his parents rather than a Natural Law Natural-born Citizen born on soil to married US citizen parents, nevertheless is a ~ r iish
i
. Barack Obama was adopted in
student who then were duly divorced on March 20, 1964; and then when in the mother's custody during her 2 mamage
"Y
That notwithstanding the citizenship status of Barack Obama, Affirmant contends that Barack Obarna has multiple allegiances despite taking an oath ,
Brotherhood, Hamas, Hezbollah, G ~ ~ L EMovement
N
and Iran against the People of (he United States to establish the Caliphate from Thailand through
including Steve Bellone who would aid and abet Barack Obama in usurpation of office of POTUS is no less than guilty of misprision of felony, sedition
and treason.
the U.S. Constitution, NYS Constitution, 18 U.S.C. $ 2381 through $2390 and related law, including but not limited to N.Y.S. Election Law (j 16-100,
N.Y.S. CPLR (j 7202 and N.Y.S. Civil Service Law (j 105 as applies to any public officer misapplication and administration of laws; the same is true to
>.....
"- .E;"V
09
did..
231:
..*# ,
Sworn to .bbfore.me- - , ..
This -xd$ . o f ' - N o v ~ ~20~12
k~~.
---
..'
< ,- -
7
:
;
.NI J-INDIG
NOTARY WBUC, S m of
Cc: Steve Bellone 107 Vanderbilt Avenue -- West Babylon, ~y 11704
No. 011Q u a l i in Klngs County
Co-.wion
~xpiresFebrualY 28.2015
STATE OF NEW YORK
)
)
COUNTY OF KINGS

593 ~ande;bilt Avenue - 281
Brooklyn New York 1 1238
Email: chris@strunlcws
88.
Janet DiFiore District Attorney
Office of Westchester District Attorney
1 1 1 Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. Blvd.
White Plains, New York 10601
Based upon information and belief, Ken Jenkins of 108 Bushey Avenue -- Yonkers, NY 10710 is the 2012 Democratic Party candidate for Elector as
part of the slate for Barack Obama and Joe Biden at the State of New York November 6,2012 General Election for choosing New York's candidate for
the office of President and Vice President of the United States (POTUS) by their vote cast by December 15,2012; and that such Public Officers are to
federal officer including office of POTUS, U.S. Term Limits. Inc. v. Thornton, 5 14 U.S. 779 (1995).
That in addition to the foregoing, Affirmant based upon information and belief contends that Barack Obarna is guilty of forgery, spoliation, concealment
student who then were duly divorced on March 20, 1964; and then when in the mother's custody during her 2"'maniage Barack Obarna was adopted in
Number no later than 1980, forged a Selective Service filing dated 1980, and inter alia in furtherance of usurpation of the ofice of POTUS no later than
That notwithstanding the citizenship status of Barack Obama, Affirmant contends thai Barack Obama has multiple allegiances despite taking an oath .
Brotherhood, Harnas, Hezbollah, GULEN Movement and Iran against the People of the United States to establish the Caliphate from Thailand through
including Ken Jenkins who would aid and abet Barack Obama in usurpation of office of POTUS is no less than guilty of misprision of felony, sedition
and treason.
the U.S. Constitution, NYS Constitution, 18 U.S.C. Q 2381 through $2390 and related law, including but not limited to N.Y.S. Election Law Q 16-100,
N.Y.S. CPLR jj 7202 and N.Y.S. Civil Service Law Q 105 as applies to any public officer misapplication and administration of laws; the same is true to
Christopher-Earl : Strunk
-
,$$f@
,
Notary Public
:4
PUBLIC. sag Of my&
No. 01-
> -,-?<- .-..-'oua~lfbdin Kings

- ..... - .-....chmisslqnE X ~ WF e b ~ a l y281m15
Cc: Ken Jenkins 108 Bushey Avenue -- Yonkers, NY 10710

STATE OF NEW YORK
)
)
COUNTY OF KINGS
Accordingly,
'

Brooklyn New York 1 1238
ss.
I, Christopher-Earl: Strunk in esse b e i n g duly sworn, depose and say under penalty of perjury:

Cyrus R. Vance, Jr. District A t t o r n e y

T h e New York County District Attorney's Off~ce
One Hogan P l a c e
New York, NY 10013
Based upon information and belief, Eric Schneiderman of 645 West End Avenue, #8F -- New York, NY 10025, Sheldon Silver of 550 Grand
Street, #5A -- New York, NY 10002, Walter Cooper of 150 West 96th Street, #I2G -- New York, NY, Keith L.T. Wright of 2225 Fifth Avenue -New York, NY 10037, Christine C. Quinn of 263 Ninth Avenue, #3A --New York, NY 10001 , William Thompson of 106 West 121st Street -- New
York, NY 10027 and Scott Stringer of 155 West 71st Street, #3A --New York, NY 10023, Emily Giske of 440 West 24th Street --New York, NY
10014, and Scott Adams of 11 Poplar Avenue -- Orchard Park, NY 14127 are the 2012 Democratic Party candidate for Elector as part of the slate for
Barack Obama and Joe Biden at the State of New York November 6,2012 General Election for choosing New York's candidate for the office of
President and Vice President of the United States (POTUS) by their vote cast by December 15,2012; and that such Public Officers are to participate as a
member of the State of New York electoral college intending to vote for Barack Obama as if mandated by the State of New York legislature with
exclusive power afforded by Article 2 Section 1 of the U.S. Constitution with use of New York State Election Law and related rules, McPherson V.
Blacker, 146 U.S. 1 (1892), with the proviso that no Public Official may change the eligibility and or qualification requirements of a federal officer
including office of POTUS, U.S.Term Limits. Inc. v. Thornton, 5 14 U.S. 779 (1995).
.
That in addition to the foregoing, Affirmant based upon information and belief contends that Barack Obama is guilty of forgery, spoliation,
concealment intimidation of witnesses and racketeering in the matter of his alleged Common Law citizen status as if a Native-born Citizen
notwithstanding the allegiance status of his parents rather than a Natural Law Natural-born Citizen born on soil to married US citizen parents,
nevertheless is a British Subject with dual allegiance at birth wherever that was to the minor US Citizen mother in wedlock to a majority aged British
subject foreign alien student who then were duly divorced on March 20, 1964; and then when in the mother's custody during her 2"d marriage Barack
Obama was adopted in Indonesia by his Indonesian Citizen step-father, Lolo Soetoro, who gave the name "SOEBARKAH according to the U.S. State
Department record affirmed on the August 13, 1968 by Stanley Ann Soetoro; and thereafter as an Indonesian Citizen SOEBARKAH (aka Barry Soetoro)
reentered the USA in 1971 alone without a US Passport to live with his grandmother who obtained foreign student funding, illegally obtained a stolen
Social Security Number no later than 1980, forged a Selective Service filing dated 1980, and inter alia in furtherance of usurpation of the office of
POTUS no later than April 25,201 1, according to more than three experts, forged a Long Form Certificate of Birth as if of Hawaii.
That notwithstanding the citizenship status of Barack Obama, Affirmant contends that Barack Obama has multiple allegiances despite taking an
oath owing exclusive allegiance to the United States, levies war against the People of the United States, adheres to their enemies al-Qaida, Muslim
including Eric Schneiderman, Walter Cooper, Sheldon Silver, Keith L.T. Wright, Christine C. Quinn , William Thompson, Scott Stringer, Emily Giske
and Scott Adams who would aid and abet Barack Obama in usurpation of office of POTUS is no less than guilty of misprision of felony, sedition and
treason.
Based upon the foregoing subject there is a preponderance of evidence proving that the April 25,201 1 forged public document is for the
purpose of usurping the POTUS, and that were any New York State Public Officer Electors to cast a vote aiding abetting each crime the civil servant
would be an accessory after the fact to a felony under New York Penal Law; and as such Affirmant provides due notice hereby as a matter of standing
guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution, NYS Constitution, 18 U.S.C. $ 2381 through $2390 and related law, including but not limited to N.Y.S. Election
Law $ 16-100, N.Y.S. CPLR Q 7202 and N.Y.S. Civil Service Law Q 105 as applies to any public officer misapplication and administration of laws; the
same is true to my own knowledge, except as to the matters therein stated to be alleged on information and belief, and as to those matters I believe it to be
true. The grounds of my beliefs as to all matters not stated upon information and
knowledge.
.,K~J:O:.~...~O:~
.,...
~ h E & o ~ h e r - ~ aStrunk
rl:
Sworn to before me. -,A.
NOWRYW8WC,Stooeot~Y~
No.O w m 3 f s 5 9
Qualified in KlWS County
~r-iarinn
FvnLaa Fahmaw 28.2015
Cc: Eric Schneiderman 645 West End Avenue, #8F -- New York, NY 10025
Christine C. Quinn of 263 Ninth Avenue, #3A --New York, NY 10001
Scott Stringer of 155 West 7Ist Street, #3A -- New York, NY 10023
CERTIFIED RETURN RECEIPT # 70 10 1870000042924412

STATE OF NEW YORK
)
) ss.
COUNTY OF KINGS
'


Francis D. Phillips District Attorney
Office of the Orange County District Attorney
40 Matthews Street
Goshen, NY 10924
Based upon information and belief, Mario Cilento of 3 Isabel Road -- Orangeburg, NY 10962 is the 2012 Democratic Party candidate for Elector as part
of the slate for Barack Obama and Joe Biden at the State of New York November 6,2012 General Election for choosing New York's candidate for the
office of President and Vice President of the United States (POTUS) by their vote cast by December 15,2012; and that such Public Officers are to
federal officer including office of POTUS, US. Term Limits. Inc. v. Thornton, 5 14 U.S. 779 (1995).
Subject with dual allegiance at birth wherever that was to the minor US Citizen mother in wedlock to a major:? agedBritish subject foreign alien
student who then were duly divorced on March 20, 1964; and then when in the mother's custody during her 2 marrlage Barack Obama was adopted in
including Mario Cilento who would aid and abet Barack Obama in usurpation of office of POTUS is no less than guilty of misprision of felony, sedition
and treason.
the U.S. Constitution, NYS Constitution, 18 U.S.C. $ 2381 through $2390 and related law, including but not limited to N.Y.S. Election Law Ej 16-100,
N.Y.S. CPLR 6 7202 and N.Y.S. Civil Service Law $ 105 as applies to any public officer misapplication and administration of laws; the same is true to
n
&zk
,., ...., _ ,
---pay.a .5..23;2
stopher-Earl: Strunk
Sworn to before pi$ - \ . -
Cc: Mario Cilento 3 Isabel Road - Orangeburg, NY 10962

593 ~anderbiltAvenue - 281

STATE OF NEW YORK
C
OF
~ KINGS
Y
)
) ss.
Sandra Doorley District Attorney
Monroe County District Attorney's Office.
47 South Fitzhugh Street
Rochester, NY 14614
Based upon information and belief, Robert Duffy of 164 Croydon Road -- Rochester, NY 14610 and Joseph Morelle of 133 Deerfield Drive -Rochester, NY 14609 are the 2012 Democratic Party candidate for Elector as part of the slate for Barack Obama and Joe Biden at the State of New York
their vote cast by December 15, 2012; and that such Public Officers are to participate as a member of the State of New York electoral college intending
Official may change the eligibility and or qualification requirements of a federal officer including office of POTUS, US. Term Limits, Inc. v. Thornton,
514 U.S. 779 (1995).
Subject with dual allegiance at birth wherever that was to the minor US Citizen mother in wedlock to a majori? aged British subject foreign alien
student who then were duly divorced on March 20, 1964; and then when in the mother's custody during her 2" marriage Barack Obama was adopted in
That notwithstanding the citizenship status of Barack Obama, Affirmant contends that Barack Obarna has multiple allegiances despite taking an oath
including Robert Duffy and Joseph Morelle who would aid and abet Barack Obama in usurpation of office of POTUS is no less than guilty of misprision
of felony, sedition and treason.
the U.S. Constitution, NYS Constitution, 18 U.S.C. (j 2381 through $2390 and related law, including but not limited to N.Y.S. Election Law $ 16-100,
N.Y.S. CPLR (j 7202 and N.Y.S. Civil Service Law (j 105 as applies to any public officer misapplication and administration of laws; the same is true to
of ~ e yo*
w
..__
......_...I.
Cc: Robert Duffy 164 Croydon Road -- Rochester, NY 14610

'
CERTIFIED RETURN RECEIPT # 70 10187000004292445OW

593 ~anderbiltAvenue - 28 1
Email: chris@stru&.ws
STATE OF NEW YORK
)
)
COUNTY OF KINGS
SS.
Robert T. Johnson District Attorney
The Office of the Bronx County District Attorney
198 East 161st Street
Bronx, NY 10451.
--
Based upon information and belief, George Gresham of 1313 East 233rd Street -- Bronx, NY 10466 and Ruben Diaz, Jr. of 820 Boyton Avenue, #6D
Bronx, NY 10473 are the 2012 Democratic Party candidate for Elector as part of the slate for Barack Obama and Joe Biden at the State of New York
their vote cast by December 15,2012; and that such Public Officers are to participate as a member of the State of New York electoral college intending
Official may change the eligibility and or qualification requirements of a federal officer including office of POTUS, US.Term Limits. Inc. v. Thornton,
514 U.S. 779 (1995).
student who then were duly divorced on March 20, 1964; and then when in the mother's custody during her 2"'marriage Barack Obama was adopted in
in 1971 alone without a US Passport to live with his grandmother who obtained foreign student funding. illegally obtained a stolen Social Security
owing exclusive allegiance to the United States, levies war against the People of theunited States, adheres to their enemies al-Qaida, Muslim
Brotherhood, Hamas, Hezbollah, GijLEN Movement and Iran against the People of the United States to establish the Caliphate from Thailand through
including George Gresham and Ruben Diaz, Jr. who would aid and abet Barack Obama in usurpation of office of POTUS is no less than guilty of
misprision of felony, sedition and treason.
the U.S. Constitution, NYS Constitution, 18 U.S.C. rj 2381 through $2390 and related law, including but not limited to N.Y.S. Election Law Ej 16-100,
N.Y.S. CPLR rj 7202 and N.Y.S. Civil Service Law Sj 105 as applies to any public officer misapplication and administration of laws; the same is true to
.._ \...
z . . . .
'
.\-
. Sworn to befQie. -fie.
..
.
._
-2412
..
--
Cc: George Gresham 1313 East 233rd Street -- Bronx, NY 10466

Qualifiedin Kings County
r,,,miec,ion
Expires February 289 z0I5
CERTIFIED RETURN RECEIPT # 70101870000042924474*

STATE OF NEW YORK
)
) ss.
COUNTY OF KINGS
'

Email: chris@strunk,ws
Charles J. Hynes District Attorney

Kings County District Attorney's Office
350 Jay Street
Brooklyn, New York, NY 1 1201
Based upon information and belief, Bill DeBlasio of 442 1lth Street -- Brooklyn, NY 11215, Felix Ortiz 189 B 33rd Street -- Brooklyn, NY 11232 and
Hakeem Jeffries 35 Underhill Avenue, #2A -- Brooklyn, NY are the 2012 Democratic Party candidate for Elector as part of the slate for Barack
Obama and Joe Biden at the State of New York November 6,2012 General Election for choosing New York's candidate for the office of President and
Vice President of the United States (POTUS) by their vote cast by December 15,2012; and that such Public Officers are to participate as a member of
the State of New York electoral college intending to vote for Barack Obama as if mandated by the State of New York legislature with exclusive power
afforded by Article 2 Section 1 of the U.S. Constitution with use of New York State Election Law and related rules, McPherson v. Blacker, 146 U.S. 1
(1892), with the proviso that no Public Official may change the eligibility and or qualification requirements of a federal officer including office of
POTUS, U.S. Term Limits,Inc. v. Thornton, 514 U.S. 779 (1995).
student who then were duly divorced on March 20, 1964; and then when in the mother's custody during her 2"'maniage Barack Obama was adopted in
affirmed on the August 13, 1968 by Stanley Ann Soetoro; and thereafter as q Indonesian Citizen SOEBARKAH (aka Barry Soetoro) reentered the USA
owing exclusive allegiance to the United States, levies war against the People of the united States, adheres to their enemies al-Qaida, Muslim
including Bill DeBlasio, Felix Ortiz and Hakeem Jeffries who would aid and abet Barack Obarna in usurpation of office of POTUS is no less than.
guilty of misprision of felony, sedition and treason.
the U.S. Constitution, NYS Constitution, 18 U.S.C. Ej 2381 through $2390 and related law, including but not limited to N.Y.S. Election Law Ej 16-100,
N.Y.S. CPLR Ej 7202 and N.Y.S. Civil Service Law Ej 105 as applies to any public officer misapplication and administration of laws; the same is true to
arties, books and records, and personal knowledge.
grounds of my beliefs as to all matters not stated upon information and belief are as foll
I.l-.L"'...'
%..
\;.,
....,
. - - ,'.i,&.2 B5
stopher-Earl: Strunk
2oI2
+..--?bCIJFJ,@.$ Sworn to befwi me. -.
CC: Felix Ortiz 189 B 33rd Street -- Brooklyn, NY 11232

Hakeern Jeffries 35 Underhill Avenue, #2A -- Brooklyn, NY 11238
Bill DeBlasio of 442 1 Ith Street -- Brooklyn, NY 11215
myM
QUaliiinKhrgs~nty
C&nm&&~)n
Expkes February 28,2016
-i
'
~
1. i
. ,.


d
STATE OF NEW YORK
)
) 5s.
COUNTY OF KINGS
Accordingly, I, Chstopher-Earl: Strunk in esse being duly sworn, depose and say under penalty of perjury:
1i
COMPLAINT OF ATTEMPT TO COMMIT A CFUME BY A PUBLIC OFFICER WITH NOTICE OF INTENT TO

William J. Fitzpatrick District Attorney

Onondaga County DA's Office
Criminal Courts Building - 4th Floor 505 South State Street
Syracuse, NY 13202
Based upon information and belief, Stephanie Miner of 102 Woodside Drive -- Syracuse, NY 13224 is the 2012 Democratic Party candidate for Elector
as part of the slate for Barack Obama and Joe Biden at the State of New York November 6,2012 General Election for choosing New York's candidate
McPherson v. Blacker, 146 U.S. 1 (1892), with the prdviso that no Public Official may change the eligibility and or qualification requirements of a
Subject with dual allegiance at birth wherever that was to the minor US Citizen mother in wedlock to a majoriy agedBritish subject foreign alien
student who then were duly divorced on March 20, 1964; and then when in the mother's custody during her 2 marrlage Barack Obama was adopted in
'i
That notwithstanding the citizenship status of Barack Obama, Affirmant contends that Barack Obama has multiple allegiances despite taking an oath ,
Morocco, giving them aid and comfort within the United States or elsewhere, is guilty of treason; and that any candidate elector and or public off~cer
including Stephanie Miner who would aid and abet Barack Obama in usurpation of office of POTUS is no less than guilty of misprision of felony,
sedition y d treason.
the U.S. Constitution, NYS Constitution, 18 U.S.C. 4 2381 through $2390 and related law, including but not limited to N.Y.S. Election Law 4 16-100,
N.Y.S. CPLR 7202 and N.Y.S. Civil Service Law 4 105 as applies to any public officer misapplication and administration of laws; the same is true to
mv own knowledge. exceDt as to the matters therein stated to be alleged on information and belief, and as to those matters 1 believe it to be true. The
grbunds of my beliefs as ;o all matters not stated upon information &d belief
u
,q,;.".."."
Sworn to before me,..-$ 4 fl

5;'%)s4 . ~., ~ 2
.--.
This -dav of N&fi~ber 2612 -- .,.'
-.
. ., -.
Cc: Stephanie Miner 102 Woodside Drive -- Syracuse, NY 13224
m

STATE OF N E W YORK
)
) 88.
C O U N OF
~ KINGS

il
Richard A. Brown District Attorney
Queens County District Attorney's Office
125-01 Queens Boulevard
Kew Gardens, New York 1 1415
Based upon information and belief, Grace Meng of 14714 34th Avenue -- Flushing, NY 11354 ,Anne Marie Anzalone of 2827 48th Street -- Astoria,
NY 11103 and Archie Spigner of 11210 175th Street -- Jamaica, NY 1 1433 are the 2012 Democratic Party candidate for Elector as part of the slate for
Barack Obama and Joe Biden at the State of New York November 6,2012 General Election for choosing New York's candidate for the office of
President and Vice President of the United States (POTUS) by their vote cast by December 15,2012; and that such Public Officers are to participate as a
member of the State of New York electoral college intending to vote for Barack Obama as if mandated by the State of New York legislature with
exclusive power afforded by Article 2 Section 1 of the U.S. Constitution with use of New York State Election Law and related rules, McPherson v.
Blacker, 146 U.S. 1 (1892), with the proviso that no Public Official may change the eligibility and or qualification requirements of a federal officer
including office of POTUS, U.S. Term Limits. Inc, v. Thornton, 514 U.S. 779 (1995).
That in addition to the foregoing, Afirmant based upon information and belief contends that Barack Obama is guilty of forgery, spoliation, concealment .
student who then were duly divorced on March 20, 1964; and then when in the mother's custody during her 2"'marriage Barack Obama was adopted in
including Grace Meng, Anne Marie Anzalone, and Archie Spigner who would aid and abet Barack Obama in usurpation of office of POTUS is no less
than guilty of misprision of felony, sedition and treason.
the U.S. Constitution, NYS Constitution, 18 U.S.C. $ 2381 through $2390 and related law, including but not limited to N.Y.S. Election Law $ 16-100,
N.Y.S. CPLR 4 7202 and N.Y.S. Civil Service Law $ 105 as applies to any public officer misapplication and administration of laws; the same is true to
grounds of my beliefs as to all matters not stated upon information and belief are as f o l m i e s , books and r e c H s , and personal knowledge.
\.'+'"7'
,is B:5..,zi312
. .
Sworn to before me..-., . .. .
Cc: Anne Marie Anzalone 2827 48th Street -- Astoria, NY 11103

Archie Spigner of 11210 175th Street -- Jamaica, NY 1 1433
aualiRed in King6 County

Cornmisston Expires February 28,2015
AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY REGULAR FIRST CLASS MAIL
STATE OF NEW YORK )

) ss.
COUNTY OF KINGS
a. Am over 18 years of age a n d not

b. My place of business i s located
nformed copy each of t h e respective
2012, Christ
c. On November
affidavits entitled COMPLAINT OF ATTEMPT TO COMMIT A CRIME BY A PUBLIC OFFICER WITH
2,
NOTICE OF INTENT TO REQUEST AN INJUNCTION IN KINGS COUNTY WITH DECLARATORY

RELLEF AS TO ELECTORS affirmed November 9 , 2 0 1 2 with a n d each properly addressed t o t h e District ~ t t o r n &of
t h e respective county of residence of those Electors listed b l o w , a n d in t h e s a m e envelope, a Notice of Petitioner's intent
to file an order t o show cause application a t t h e Kings County Supreme Court Building at 10 AM o n t h e l W Fioor intake
a t 360 Adams Street o n Monday November 19, 2012 delivery by USPS for service u p o n those public o E c e r s listed below.
d. On November 3,
2012, I caused each copy with proper postage for service by regular mail of listed Electors and when
each envelope was properly addressed with t h e Notification " Personal 86 Confidential' in t h e lower left hand m a of the
envelop t h a t w a s t h e n deposited with t h e USPS for service upon:
1. Andrew M. Cuomo 138 Eagle Street - Albany, NY 12202

2. Gerald D. Jennings of 1135 New Scotland Road m y , YY 12208
3. George Gresham 1313 East 233rd Street - Bronx, NY 10466
4. Ruben Diaz, Jr. of 820 Boyton Avenue, #6D - Bronx, NY 10473
5. Byron Brown 14 Blaine Street Buffalo, NY 14208
6. Felix Ortiz 189 B 33rd Street - Brooklyn, NY 11232
7. Hakeem Jefiies 35 Underhill Avenue, #2A - B r o o m N?( 11238
8. Bill DeBlasio of 442 1lth Street - B r o o m NY 11215
9. Robert D u e 164 Croydon Road - Rochester,NY 14610
10. Joseph Morelle of 133 Deerfield Drive - R c d e s u , NY 14609
11. Tom DiNapoli 100 Great Neck Road - Grea Neck NY 11M1
12. Eric Schneiderman 645 West End Avenue. Y8F New Y e W lMLS
13. Walta Cooper 150 West 96th S m #DG - 3mv York. W 114. Sheldon Silver of 550 Grand S m S5A - Nea- Y& hY 115. Keith L.T. Wright of 2225 Flifth A-?Jew Yo& SY 100316. Christine C. @inn of 263 NI& A
=A
kYO& %Y1ml
ltWT
17. William Thompson of 106 West 121sS m - S e x Y&
118. Scott Stringer of 155 West 71s S m =;A Sew Y&
19. Emily Giske of 440 West 24th Smet - b F'a437: 1OQl)ll
20. Scott Adams of 11 Poplar Awerar - O d s d Pa& hT 1413
21. Stephanie hGnu 102 Wccdskk D r k - S$7-11-224
22. Mario Cilento 3 Isabel Raad - g
\3- 10%2
23. k b h k ~ 2 % F 4 % h S L ' ~ d - - ~ X 3 - I I l ' @ 3
24. Gtace ' M a g of 14-14 3lfc - 4 v e m ~ Fl?r3IE-54
25. Amhie Spigmr of 11210 1-583 WhY 11=
26. Steve i%dIcme1K \;-A- Q-es
IlW
27. k S t z l O l ~ - w 5 n e D r k - - i ~ ? c ~ - I ~ ~
28. ~ C o n r a 2 9 D e m S ~ - l r h M k ~ i 3 ~ ~
s t ~ ~m m
b e f m me d W E T
This
& d q 0-012
4,
..
f
f
m
ir
'3Cerllfied Fee
0
0
0
0
Return Receipt Fee

(Endorsement Required)
RestrictedDelivery Fee
(Endorsement Requlred)
c
eg
yc
&
Return Receipt Fee
0 (Endorsement Required)
Total Postage & Fees
' A
- ISent TO
Sandra Doorlei
, ;
I -s,ri?et;AEN6:,:r----.
Monroe County District At ..---.----.--.--.----.-.a
orPOBox NO.
47
Street
....State,
......ZIP+$
..........Rochester,
. South Fitzhugh
. P .Cily.
NY 146 14
-............*..........
:I
2-
NEW YO% Iff 40813,
e County L-------------------
....................
*-
Certified Fee
Return R'ewipt Fee
RestrictedDc,livery Fee
I Ssnt TO
i
1 P
$&&y-
0
0
Return Receipt Fee

Cyrus R. Vance, ~r.%'sThe New York County: ....:

......;...;;..-...........
f
Office
or PO Box No.
...................
Citv. State. ZIP+4 One Hogan Place
ctiH state#
.................................
505 South State Street
New York, NY 10013
m
m
0-
3Cedifled Fee
Return Rewipt Fee
0
0
0
Return Rece~ptFee
(Endorsement Requ~red)
Restricted Delivery Fee

' A
I
/
-
Thomas J. Spota
Suffolk County District Attorney's Office
North County Complex - Building 77
Veterans Memorial Highway
U ~ ~ n n n a ~ nNV
ne 1
17RR
Isent TO
"1
--
hP
$5.7~
. Johns2-
,;4 J i
'QV@&E
_-- ---
................... The Office of the Bronx County .---.---*.---.-.A Sifeet, Apt. No.;
Attorney
9
o r ~ BOX
1.- 1----:..o....NO.
...........198 East 161st Street
cirv state ZIP+^
-.--.--.----.--4
Bronx,
1,
0TU
3-
$6.4627'
0354
\-
%":\
'
Certified Fee
0
0
Return Receipt Fee


Total Postage a Fees
i
l
- I
P
O t
7
$ b ~ 3 i i i z
Richard A. Brown I
-Street, Apt NO: Queens County District Attorney's Off----.-----.-. ;
o r p BOXNO.
~
125-01 Queens Boulevard
..- ............. Kew Gardens, New York 11415
,-------------.
city. State, ZIP
383 ~ r o a d w a ~
Fort Edward, New York 12828
fI
P
a3
dl
0
O
Postage
Ir
"_&/---
$qA%p-K&<?::,
'
Certified Fee
Return Receipt Fee
Return Receipt Fee

(EndorsementRequlred)
UJ
il
I
Cent Tn
Certified Fee
$2.95
1$
85m75
24'
Return Receipt Fee

[Endorsement Required)
1'
. .
or PO BOX
NO. '
----------------.-*---
CjU state. ZlP+4
3 5 0 ~ Street
a~
Brooklyn, N~~ yOrk,
11201
-------------
NO.
Office of Albany District Atto].-------------------6 Lodge Street, Room 401, -----...----.--.----Albany, NY 12207
-

-----------------------------------------------------------------------x
Index No.: 21948 / 2012


Petitioner,

Respondents.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------x

Exhibit 2

aristopher-Earl :Strunk in esse
593 Vanderbilt Avenue - 281 Brooklyn New York 1 1238
Index NO.:
1LTL~%\\Z
Petitioner,
-
-againstHakeem Jeffries 35 Underhill Avenue, #2A -- Brooklyn, NY 11238

Bill DeBlasio of 442 1 lth Street -- Brooklyn, NY 11215
Keith L.T. Wright of 2225 Fifth Avenue --New York, NY 10037 .
William Thompson of 106 West 121st Street --New York, NY 10027
Emily Giske of 440 West 24th Street --New York, NY I0014
Anne Marie Anzalone 2827 48th Street -- Astoria, NY 1 1 103
Gerald D. Jennings of 1135 New Scotland Road --Albany, NY 12208
Irene Stein 101 Brandywine Drive -- Ithaca, NY 14850 ,
Kirsten Gillibrand with DC Ofice 478 Russell Washington, DC 20510
Petitioner designate
The County of Kings as the
Place of trial.
The basis of venue is the
Petitioner's place to vote
Respondent@).
NOTICE OF PETITION
To the above-named Respondent(s):
YOU ARE HEREBY PETITIONED to answer the petition in this action and to serve a
copy of your answer, or, if the petition is not served with this notice, to serve a notice of
appearance, on the Petitioner within 20 days after the service of this Notice, exclusive of the day
of service; and in case of your failure to appear or answer, judgment will be taken against you by
default for the relief demanded in the petition.
Dated:
Brooklyn, New York

November 0 , 2 0 1 2
Christopher-Earl: Strunk, in esse, Petitioner

self-represent without being a n attorney
593 Vanderbilt Avenue #281,
Brooklyn, New York 11238.
(845) 901-6767 E-mail: chris@,strunk.ws
To:
Respondents as follows:

Bill DeBlasio of 442 1 1th Street -- Brooklyn, NY 11215
Scott Stringer of 1 55 West 7 1st Street, #3A -- New York, NY 10023
Kirsten Gillibrand with DC Office 478 Russell Washington, DC 2051 0
Strunk v Jeffries et al. Article 78 NYSSC for Kings County

IndexNo.:
.......................................................................
2 L q 48 /20 12
Christo her-Earl : Strunk in esse
593 VanSerbilt Avenue - 281 Brooklyn New York 11238
Petitioner,
VEFUFIED PETITION
-againstHakeem Jeffries 35 Underhill Avenue, #2A -- Brooklyn, NY 11238

FOR EQUITY RELIEF BY
Bill DeBlasio of 442 I lth Street -- Brooklyn, NY 11214
WRIT OF PROHIBITION WITH
Walter Cooper 150 West 96th Street, #I2G New York, NY 10025
Keith L.T. Wright of 2225 Fifth Avenue --New York, NY 10037
TRO STAY, INJUNCTION AND
Christine C.Quinn of 263 Ninth Avenue, #3A --New York, NY 10001
DECLARATORY JUDGMENT
Scott Stringer of 155 West 71st Street, #3A --New York, NY 10023
Emily Giske of 440 West 24th Street --New York, NY 10014
AS TO ELECTORAL COLLEGE
Anne Marie Anzalone 2827 48th Street -- Astoria, NY 11 103
PUBLIC OFFICERS WITH U.S.
CONSTITUTION ART. 2 $1 C1.2
AND VOID US SENATE ELECTION
Gerald D. Jennings of 1135New Scotland Road --Albany, NY 12208
Robert Duffy 164 Croydon Road Rochester, NY 14610
Irene Stein 101 Brandywine Drive Ithaca, NY 14850
Kirsten Gillibrand with DC Office 478 Russell Washington, DC 205 10
--
--
--
Respondents.
Petitioner, Christopher Earl: Strunk in esse, a non-surety private natural-born U.S. Citizen self
represented without an attorney, as and for his Petition for a writ of prohibition with Temporary Restraining
Order (TRO) and permanent injunction with a declaratory judgment as to U.S. Constitution Article 2 $1
Clause 2 (A2S 1C2) exclusive power of the State legislature formation of the New York electoral college that
under CPLR Article 78, the New York State Election Law Article $16-100 jurisdiction over Election Law
Article 12 and related law as applies to twenty-nine (29) U.S. Citizens to serve as Public Officer members of
the New York Electoral College afier the November 6,2012 General Election thru December 25,2012; and
Christopher-Earl: Strunk's PETITION Page 1 of 20

that this Petition requests expedited emergency equity relief with a CPLR 7805 injunction with a stay of
New York Electoral College vote due by December 15, 2012 until the Court renders a declaratory judgment
on the issues of law under CPLR 7806 regarding U.S. Constitution: Article 2 in its entirety, especially
Article 2 Section 1 paragraph 3 (A2S1C3) as amended by the Article 7 Amendments the 12th , the 14th
especially sections 3 and 4, the 20th, and the 25th ; further, especially as to the U.S. Constitution Article 2
Section 1 paragraph 5 (A2S1C5) term of art natural born Citizen (NBC) natural law issue versus the idiom
born a citizen positive law created by the New York State Board of Elections (NYS BOE); further, the
U.S. Constitution: Article 3 Section 3; Article 4; Article 6; and furthermore, related New York State law and
regulations as applies to the public officer oath, duties and obligation as applies with use of NYS Civil
Service Law 105, and that Petitioner seeks equity relief on six (6) issues of Law with Facts pertaining to the
misapplication and misadministration of Public Officer acts as relate to the December 5, 2008 Order and
Decision as a matter of State Law heard by the Honorable David I. Schmidt J.S.C. at I.A.S. Part 1 in the
Article 78 Petition with Kings County Index No.: 2008-29641, and Complaint with Index No.: 2008 29642;
and also, Petitioner challenges the New York U.S. Senate Election as void ab initio with U.S. Constitution
Amendment 17 and NYS Constitution Article 3 7 grounds; and that based upon information and belief and
at all times hereinafter mentioned, with imminent irreparable harm as time is of the essence and without
another forum for relief, alleges of captioned Respondents and related persons as follows:
1. Petitioner Christopher Earl: Strunk in esse, is a duly registered voter of the 64th Election District
of the 57th Assembly District (AD) and within the New York 8th U.S. House District at 593 Vanderbilt
Avenue 281 Brooklyn New York 11238 for ten years with email: chris@strunk.ws and cell phone 845-9016767, and an enrolled member of the Republican Party who participated at the November 6, 2012 General
Election there voted entirely for the Republican Party line of candidates with Wendy Long for US Senate.
2. On November 9, 2012, Petitioner duly served his COMPLAINT OF ATTEMPT TO COMMIT A
CRIME BY A PUBLIC OFFICER WITH NOTICE OF INTENT TO REQUEST AN INJUNCTION IN
KINGS COUNTY WITH DECLARATORY RELIEF AS TO ELECTORS (hereinafter the COMPLAINT)
upon the respective County District Attorney (DA) with jurisdiction over the domicile of residence of the
Christopher-Earl: Strunks PETITION Page 2 of 20

respective Public Officer member of the New York 2012 Presidential Election Cycle Electoral College for a
total of 29 members variously domiciled in Fourteen (14) Counties that are now duly elected without
challenge on November 6, 2012, pending the NYS BOE final tally / canvassing by the end of November, all
serve as public officer electors to cast their votes by December 15, 2012 and that then will be transmitted to
the U.S. Senate President Joseph Biden in a joint seating of the new Congress on January 3, 2013 take their
oath of office in the new Congress that there will select the next President / vice President of the United
States (POTUS) according to the 12th and 20th Amendments of A2S1C3.
3. That the criminal COMPLAINT affirms of each Public Officer in each domicile therein quote:
[each] Elector as part of the slate for Barack Obama and Joe Biden at the State of New York
November 6, 2012 General Election for choosing New Yorks candidate for the office of President
and Vice President of the United States (POTUS) by their vote cast by December 15, 2012; and that
such Public Officers are to participate as a member of the State of New York electoral college
intending to vote for Barack Obama as if mandated by the State of New York legislature with
exclusive power afforded by Article 2 Section 1 of the U.S. Constitution with use of New York State
Election Law and related rules, McPherson v. Blacker, 146 U.S. 1 (1892), with the proviso that no
Public Official may change the eligibility and or qualification requirements of a federal officer
including office of POTUS, U.S. Term Limits, Inc. v. Thornton, 514 U.S. 779 (1995).
That in addition to the foregoing, Affirmant based upon information and belief contends that Barack
Obama is guilty of forgery, spoliation, concealment intimidation of witnesses and racketeering in the
matter of his alleged Common Law citizen status as if a Native-born Citizen notwithstanding the
allegiance status of his parents rather than a Natural Law Natural-born Citizen born on soil to
married US citizen parents, nevertheless is a British Subject with dual allegiance at birth wherever
that was to the minor US Citizen mother in wedlock to a majority aged British subject foreign alien
student who then were duly divorced on March 20, 1964; and then when in the mothers custody
nd
during her 2 marriage Barack Obama was adopted in Indonesia by his Indonesian Citizen stepfather, Lolo Soetoro, who gave the name SOEBARKAH according to the U.S. State Department
record affirmed on the August 13, 1968 by Stanley Ann Soetoro; and thereafter as an Indonesian
Citizen SOEBARKAH (aka Barry Soetoro) reentered the USA in 1971 alone without a US Passport
to live with his grandmother who obtained foreign student funding, illegally obtained a stolen Social
Security Number no later than 1980, forged a Selective Service filing dated 1980, and inter alia in
furtherance of usurpation of the office of POTUS no later than April 25, 2011, according to more
than three experts, forged a Long Form Certificate of Birth as if of Hawaii.
That notwithstanding the citizenship status of Barack Obama, Affirmant contends that Barack
Obama has multiple allegiances despite taking an oath owing exclusive allegiance to the United
States, levies war against the People of the United States, adheres to their enemies al-Qaida, Muslim
Brotherhood, Hamas, Hezbollah, GLEN Movement and Iran against the People of the United
States to establish the Caliphate from Thailand through Morocco, giving them aid and comfort
within the United States or elsewhere, is guilty of treason; and that any candidate elector and or
public officer including who would aid and abet Barack Obama in usurpation of office of POTUS
is no less than guilty of misprision of felony, sedition and treason.
Based upon the foregoing subject there is a preponderance of evidence proving that the April 25,
2011 forged public document is for the purpose of usurping the POTUS, and that were any New
York State Public Officer Electors to cast a vote aiding abetting each crime the civil servant would
be an accessory after the fact to a felony under New York Penal Law; and as such Affirmant
provides due notice hereby as a matter of standing guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution, NYS
Constitution, 18 U.S.C. 2381 through 2390 and related law, including but not limited to N.Y.S.
Election Law 16-100, N.Y.S. CPLR 7202 and N.Y.S. Civil Service Law 105 as applies to any
public officer misapplication and administration of laws; the same is true to my own knowledge,
except as to the matters therein stated to be alleged on information and belief, and as to those matters
I believe it to be true. The grounds of my beliefs as to all matters not stated upon information and
rd
belief are as follows: 3 parties, books and records, and personal knowledge.
4. That the respective County DA with jurisdiction over crimes of electors in each of fourteen counties
are: P. David Soares Albany District Attorney; Robert T. Johnson The Bronx District Attorney; Frank A.
Sedita, III Erie District Attorney; Charles J. Hynes District Attorney of Kings; Sandra Doorley District
Attorney of Monroe; Kathleen M. Rice District Attorney of Nassau; Cyrus R. Vance, Jr. District Attorney of
New York; William J. Fitzpatrick District Attorney of Onondaga; Francis D. Phillips District Attorney of
Orange; Richard A. Brown District Attorney of Queens; Thomas J. Spota District Attorney of Suffolk; Gwen
Wilkinson District Attorney of Tompkins; Kevin C. Kortright District Attorney of Washington; Janet
DiFiore District Attorney of Westchester; and act independently of this civil action.
5. On November 9, 2012, Petitioner duly served a NOTICE OF INTENT TO FILE AN ARTICLE 78
PETITION WITH AN ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE APPLICATION FOR A PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
PENDING A DECLARATORY JUDGMENT ON ISSUES OF LAW AS TO ELECTORS (hereinafter known as
the NOTICE) upon the respective County District Attorney with jurisdiction over the domicile of
residence of the respective Public Officer member of the New York 2012 Presidential Election Cycle
Electoral College of 29 members in Fourteen (14) Counties got Notice that stated quote:
Please take notice of Petitioners intent to file an order to show cause application at the Kings County
Supreme Court Building at 11 AM on the 10th Floor intake at 360 Adams Street on Monday November
19, 2012 for a preliminary injunction relief pending a declaratory judgment on issues of law; e.g., Are
public officers to be held liable as accessories to felonies in usurpation of Office of POTUS and Ballot
access? Are public officers presented with the facts of Barack Obama ineligibility able to change
qualifications before the Electoral College Vote scheduled December 15, 2012?

6. On November 9, 2012, Petitioner had a person not a party to this suit serve a copy of the
COMPLAINT and NOTICE upon the New York 2012 Presidential Election Cycle Electoral College
Members for a total of 29 members in Fourteen (14) Counties individually as follows:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
27.
28.
29.

7. That Petitioner has been barred from filing any further suit without leave by the Order of Arthur M.
Schack J.S.C. in the fraud complaint Strunk v NYS BOE et al Index No.: 2011-6500 under penalty of
contempt against Public Officers:
Andrew M. Cuomo of 138 Eagle Street -- Albany, NY 12202

Tom DiNapoli of 100 Great Neck Road -- Great Neck, NY 11201
; and therefore, such named Public officers are not included herein unless by leave to do so.

AS AND FOR THE FIRST QUESTION THE NEW YORK ELECTION OF KIRSTEN
GILLIBRAND TO US SENATE IS VOID AB INITIO AS THE ELECTOR
QUALIFICATIONS ARE NOT EQUAL TO THAT OF THE NEW YORK ASSEMBLY
8. Petitioner repeats each and every allegation contained in the Introduction and paragraphs 1 thru 7
with the same force and effect as though herein set forth at length; and that as and for the first question
the New York election held November 6, 2012 of Kirsten Gillibrand to the U.S. Senate from New
York is void ab initio as to elector qualifications are not equal to that of the New York Assembly .
9. Petitioner seeks to overturn New Yorks U.S. Senate election with U.S. Const. Amendment 17
The Senate of the United States shall be composed of two Senators from each State, elected by the
people thereof, for six years; and each Senator shall have one vote. The electors in each State shall
have the qualifications requisite for electors of the most numerous branch of the State
legislatures. ..
as the November 6, 2012 election for U.S. Senator from New York between Democrat Candidate
Kirsten Gillibrand and Republican Candidate Wendy Long was conducted for electors not meeting
the qualifications of a member of the Assembly with State Constitution Article 3 Section 7:
. No person shall serve as a member of the legislature unless he or she is a citizen of the United
States and has been a resident of the state of New York for five years, and, except as hereinafter
otherwise prescribed, of the assembly district for the twelve months immediately preceding his
or her election; or member of assembly at the first election next ensuing after a readjustment or
alteration of the assembly districts becomes effective, a person, to be eligible to serve as such,
must have been a resident of the county in which the senate or assembly district is contained for
the twelve months immediately preceding his or her election. (Emphasis added by Petitioner)
10. In addition to the above listed State Officers, Petitioner has also been barred from filing any further
suit without leave by the Order of Arthur M. Schack J.S.C. in the fraud complaint Strunk v NYSBOE et al
Index No.: 2011-6500 under penalty of contempt against other Public Officers and State entities:
The New York State Board of Ellection and its agents

The New York Secretary of State
City of New York among many other persons;
as such named Public officers and agencies are not included herein unless by leave to do so, Petitioner
wishes the Court to void the U.S. Senate Election and ask the Governor set a special election, because a
significant number of the electors casting their respective vote were domiciled in New York for less than

fives years and had not lived in their respective county of domicile for at least twelve months and there is no
way to determine from the votes cast on Novemebr 6, 2012 of those qualified what candidate was voted for.
11. That Petitioners right to suffrage, a republican form of governement, Freedom and Liberty; are and
would be infringed were the election of US Senator not held void ab initio and that a new special election
held; and therefore, public officers yet name along with Respondent Kirsten Gillibrand of 15 West 26th
Street, Suite 4R, New York, NY 10010 with her present place of business at Washington, DC Office
478 Russell Washington, DC 20510, as a public officer has infringed my rights and acted contrary to the law
of the land with those yet named as each Respondent must either be sanctioned and barred from office and a
new special elelction arranged for qualified elelctors as soon as possible.
12. In addition to the US Senate Election, regarding the POTUS Election there are five (5) categories of
elector public officers who are the respondents herein that each of whom have separate and or combined
issue questioned specifically as to each member of the respective categrory or jointly, and that based upon
information and belief and at all times hereinafter mentioned, Petitioner respectfully alleges a question of law
issue as to the captioned Respondents within each category of those public or quasi public officers with
fiduciary duty who were notified of an accessory crime in which each participates in, especially if their
respective vote is cast as an elector are :
a. The Electors who are Public Officers elected to Congress duty as to matter of law and facts.
b. The Electors who are Public Union trustees have fiduciary duty as to matter of law and facts.
c. The Electors who are Registered Lobbyists have fiduciary duty as to matter of law and facts.
d. All the Electors as Public Officers when notified of crime have duty as to the law and facts.
e. The Elector private person as an Elector Public Officer duty as to matter of law and facts.
13. That Petitioner pursuant to the requirements of CPLR 7801 as to the nature of proceeding for relief
by writ of mandamus or prohibition that shall be obtained in a proceeding under this article is made for a writ
or order of prohibition, in which such reference shall, so far as applicable, be deemed to refer to the
proceeding authorized by this article.

14. That Petitioner pursuant to the requirements of CPLR 7802 as to captioned Parties of electors listed
herein in part is in keeping with the definition of "body or officer", and the expression "body or officer" that
includes every court, tribunal, board, corporation, officer, or other person, or aggregation of persons, whose
action may be affected by a proceeding under this article; and that Petitioner contends that Respondent
Electors have maliciously acted contrary to the prohibition in favor of another and where this proceeding is
brought to restrain the Electors individually and as a body or officers from proceeding without or in excess of
jurisdiction in favor of another, the latter shall be joined as a party; and that Petitioner understands that other
interested persons in adequately represented by Petitioner actions herein by order of the court may direct that
notice of the proceeding be given to any person, and may allow other interested persons to intervene were it
not to prejudice the emergency nature of this action.
15. In addition to the above question Petitioner pursuant to the requirements of CPLR 7803
raises Questions that may be raised in a proceeding under this article that are as follows:
AS AND FOR THE SECOND QUESTION AS TO PUBLIC OFFICERS HAKEEM
JEFFRIES AND GRACE MENG AS TO NEW U.S. HOUSE MEMBERS AND
ELECTORS WITH A DUTY AS TO A MATTER OF LAW AND FACTS ARE IN
CONFLICT WITH A2S1C2 AS SUCH PERSONS SIMILARLY SITUATED ARE
BARRED ELECTORAL COLLEGE VOTE REVIEW AFTER JANUARY 2, 2013.
16.
Petitioner repeats each and every allegation contained in the Introduction and paragraphs 1 thru 15
with the same force and effect as though herein set forth at length; and that public officers Respondent
Hakeem Jeffries and Respondent Grace Meng as to new U.S. House members and Electors with a duty as to
matter of law and facts are in conflict with U.S. Constitution Article 2 Section 1 paragraph 2, i.e. A2S1C2
states Each State shall appoint, in such Manner as the Legislature thereof may direct, a Number of
Electors, equal to the whole Number of Senators and Representatives to which the State may be
entitled in the Congress: but no Senator or Representative, or Person holding an Office of
Trust or Profit under the United States, shall be appointed an Elector. as such persons
similarly situated are barred Electoral College vote review after January 2, 2013.

17.
Other than U.S. Constitution Article VI it does not specify the form of oath a Congressman is to take
The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the Members of the several State
Legislatures, and all executive and judicial Officers, both of the United States and of the several
States, shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation, to support this Constitution; but no religious Test
shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust under the United States.
and was a function of the respective state and federal law as in New York State Public Officer Law 10
requires every public officer to take and file an oath or affirmation prior to the discharge of any of their
official duties and to be certified to the clerk of the respective body . The form of the oath or affirmation is
set forth in Article XIII, Section 1 of the New York State Constitution ( 1 )
18. That Petitioners understanding of the Decision and Order of Justice Schmidt referenced above is
that a New York Electoral College Elector is merely a private person not required to take an oath in New
York or elsewhere to uphold the State or Federal Constitution and as such may vote as a private person.
19. That Petitioners New York State Assembly Representative of the 57th AD is presently Respondent
Hakeem Jeffries of 35 Underhill Avenue, #2A -- Brooklyn, NY 11238 and pending the final tally and
canvassing by the end of the month of November will also be the Elected member of the United States House
of Representatives from the New York 8th House District
20. That Respondent Hakeem Jeffries intends as a House member to take his oath to uphold the State
and US Constitution on Janaury 3, 2013, intends to sit in the joint session of Congress thereafter to review
his own and other votes as an elector as a second bite of the apple despite the prohibitition by A2S1C2 to do
so; and intends so despite that Respondent has been given notice by Petitioner.
NYSC ARTICLE XIII Public Officers [Oath of office; no other test for public office] Section 1. Members of the
legislature, and all officers, executive and judicial, except such inferior officers as shall be by law exempted, shall,
before they enter on the duties of their respective offices, take and subscribe the following oath or affirmation: "I do
solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support the constitution of the United States, and the constitution of the State of
New York, and that I will faithfully discharge the duties of the office of ......, according to the best of my ability;" no
other oath, declaration or test shall be required as a qualification for any office of public trust, except that any
committee of a political party may, by rule, provide for equal representation of the sexes on any such committee, and a
state convention of a political party, at which candidates for public office are nominated, may, by rule, provide for equal
representation of the sexes on any committee of such party. (Amended by Constitutional Convention of 1938 and
approved by vote of the people November 8, 1938.)

21. Respondent Grace Meng of 14714 34th Avenue -- Flushing, NY 11354 is a American lawyer
holding an office of trust and profit and is a member of the New York State Assembly, representing the 22nd
assembly district in Flushing, Queens, New York, and pending the final tally and canvassing by the end of
November will also be the Elected member of the United States House of Representatives from the New
York 6th House District.
22. That the Respondent Grace Meng as a House member takes her oath to uphold the State and U.S.
Constitution before Janaury 3, 2013, and then intends to sit in the joint session of Congress thereafter to
review her own and other votes as an elector as a second bite of the apple despite the prohibitition by
A2S1C2 to do so; and intends so despite that Respondent has been given notice by Petitioner.
23. That arguendo re A2S1C2, but no Senator or Representative, or Person holding an Office of
Trust or Profit under the United States, shall be appointed an Elector use is still with the original meaning
and intent despite the addition of the 12th , 14th , 16th and 20th Amendments notwithstanding; and that the
original use before ratification of the 14th amendment considered each State of the several States was
sovereign and not subservient to the USA in regards to the enforcement of the Bill of Rights applied to the
Federal entity that was properly termed these United States not as now termed after ratification of the `14th
Amendment (1868) became the singular United States, as each State of the several States became and now
remain subservient along with every state citizen therein placed under USA jurisdiction per se; and
24. Further arguendo re original use of A2S1C2, but no Senator or Representative, or Person holding
an Office of Trust or Profit under the United States, shall be appointed an Elector includes any state
officer and or public officer accordingly, and that the same meaning for Senator who was appointed by the
respective State legislature before the 17th Amendment as the representative of the respective State is then
and now intended to equate that relationship to every House member even though elected by State Citizens
privileged to vote, and therefore also equates to every Person holding an Office of Trust or Profit too,
and therefore includes every Public officer, in any state or federal jurisdiction, all except a private person per
se; and.

25. Furthermore arguendo re the issues of Law with Facts pertaining to the misapplication and
misadministration of Public Officer acts in 2012 as relate to the December 5, 2008 Order and Decision as a
matter of State Law heard by the Honorable David I. Schmidt J.S.C. at I.A.S. Part 1 in the Article 78
Petition with Kings County Index No.: 2008-29641 as a matter of the Federal Law of the Land A2S1C2 still
un-amended is that the only interpretation of State law involved in the Order and Decision of December 5,
2008 by the Honorable David I. Schmidt J.S.C. must be in keeping with the exclusive power, McPherson v.
Blacker, 146 U.S. 1 (1892), of the New York State Legislature in its plenary formation of the New York
electoral college may not change the meaning of A2S1C2 and A2S1C5 at best would have to be a retiring
public officer to serve as an elector but make any Person holding an Office of Trust or Profit after
January 2, of the year following the general election of the POTUS ineligible and as such the member of the
respective Electoral College is to be a private U.S. Citizen under Federal jurisdiction as an elector is a public
officer per se who votes by no later than December 25, 2012 every four years and when the joint seating of
Congress convenes on January 3, 2013 the next year and every four years thereafter until there is a
amendment to the quasi Federal officer status of an elector means that without an amendment, no State and
or Congress may change the eligibility requirements of a Federal officer includes the elector as well as that
of POTUS with A2S1C5, U.S. Term Limits, Inc. v. Thornton, 514 U.S. 779 (1995).
26. A State Officer and local officer as public officers hold an office of trust, and that persons registered
with a privilege from the State such as an attorney, union trustee, lobbyist hold an office of trust for profit.
27. That were Respondents Grace Meng, Hakeem Jeffries and or anyother person similarly situated
according to A2S1C2 who are officers of the State while acting as electors and as persons holding an office
of trust or profit to review their own vote in Congress after Janaury 2, 2013 and also be an elector would
infringe Petitioners right to suffrage, a republican form of governement, Freedom and Liberty; and
therefore, Respondents acts as public officers is and would be contrary to the law of the land as each
Respondent must either be barred from voting or office and or if done be referred for criminal action.

AS AND FOR THE THIRD QUESTION AS TO PUBLIC OFFICERS WHO ARE THE
ELECTORS WHO ARE PUBLIC UNION TRUSTEES WHO HAVE A FIDUCIARY
DUTY AS TO MATTERS OF LAW AND FACTS ATTEMPT TO CHANGE THE
POTUS ELIGIBILITY QUALIFICATIONS OF A2S1C5 AND ARE IN CONFLICT
WITH A2S1C2 AND ARE BARRED FROM SUCH VOTE AS A BREACH OF A
FIDUCIARY DUTY TO THEIR MEMBERSHIP AND PEOPLE OF NEW YORK
with the same force and effect as though herein set forth at length; and that public officers who are the
electors who are public union trustees have a fiduciary duty as to matters of law and facts attempt
to change the POTUS eligibility qualifications of A2S1C5 and are in conflict with A2S1C2, are
barred from such vote as a breach of a fiduciary duty to their membership and People of the State of
New York.
29. That Respondent George Gresham is a incumbent elected President of 1199 SEIU United
Healthcare Workers East to participate as a member of the State of New York electoral college.
30. That Respondent George Gresham is a registered fiduciary operating with the state of New York as
a qusai Public Officer as a Person holding an Office of Trust or Profit who has a conflict of interest
as an elector despite the prohibitition by A2S1C2 and A2S1C5 to do so; and intends to proceed as an elelctor
tovote by Decmber 15, 2012 despite Notice to Respondent by Petitioner.
31. That Respondent Mario Cilento is a incumbent elected President of the New York State AFL-CIO
by the organization's Executive Council to participate as a member of the State of New York electoral
college.
32. That Respondent Mario Cilento is a registered fiduciary operating with the state of New York as a
qusai Public Officer as a Person holding an Office of Trust or Profit who has a conflict of interest

as an elector despite the prohibitition by A2S1C2 and A2S1C5 to do so; and intends to proceed as an elector
to vote by December 15, 2012 despite Notice to Respondent by Petitioner.
33. That Respondent Scott Adams is a incumbent elected director of UAW Region 9 with Local 686
Local 774 Local 1069 Local 1097 Local 2300 Local 3303 to participate as a member of the State of New
York electoral college
34. That Respondent Scott Adams is a registered fiduciary operating with the state of New York as a
quasi Public Officer as a Person holding an Office of Trust or Profit who has a conflict of interest
as an elector despite the prohibitition by A2S1C2 and A2S1C5 to do so; and intends to proceed as an elector
to vote by December 15, 2012 despite Notice to Respondent by Petitioner.
35. That were Public Union Fiduciary Respondents and any other similar representative similarly
situated to cast a vote a POTUS candidate that is not eligible for POTUS would infringe Union member trust
and similarly private US citizens like Petitioners right to suffrage, republican form of governement,
Freedom and Liberty; and therefore, their action as public officers is contrary and should lead to removal
from their office and or disbanning the respective union and return of alll union member funds.
AS AND FOR THE FOURTH QUESTION AS TO PUBLIC OFFICERS WHO ARE

THE ELECTORS WHO ARE REGISTERED LOBBYISTS HAVE FIDUCIARY
DUTY AS TO MATTERS OF LAW AND FACTS ARE QUASI PUBLIC OFFICERS
WITH A FIDUCIARY DUTY ATTEMPT TO CHANGE THE POTUS ELIGIBILITY
QUALIFICATIONS OF A2S1C5 AND ARE IN CONFLICT WITH A2S1C2 AND
ARE BARRED FROM SUCH VOTE AS A BREACH OF A FIDUCIARY DUTY TO
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
with the same force and effect as though herein set forth at length; and that public officers who are the
electors who are registered lobbyists have fiduciary duty as to matters of law and facts are quasi
public officers with a fiduciary duty attempt to change the POTUS eligibility qualifications of

A2S1C5 and are in conflict with A2S1C2, are barred from such vote as a breach of a fiduciary
duty to the People of the State of New York
37. That Respondent Emily Giske is a incumbent government affairs specialist based in New York with
extensive experience in Albany and New York City. She has lobbied for corporations, financial institutions,
not-for-profit entities and local municipalities including Las Vegas gambling interests lobbyist to participate
as a member of the State of New York electoral college.
38. That Respondent Emily Giske is a lobbyist with the state of New York as a qusai Public Officer as
a Person holding an Office of Trust or Profit who has a conflict of interest as an elector despite the
prohibitition by A2S1C2 and A2S1C5 to do so; and intends to proceed as an elector to vote by Decmber 15,
2012 despite Notice to Respondent by Petitioner.
39. That were a Lobbyist registered in New York and any other similar representative similarly situated
to cast a vote a POTUS candidate that is not eligible for POTUS would infringe the trust due the People of
New York as similarly to Petitioners right to suffrage, republican form of government, Freedom and Liberty.
And therefore their action as public officers is contrary and should lead to removal of Respondents license,
order fines levied under State Lobbying law, and crimnal investigation.
AS AND FOR THE FIFTH QUESTION AS TO PUBLIC OFFICERS WHO also are
AN ELECTOR PUBLIC OFFICER ALSO HAVE DUTY AS TO MATTERS OF
LAW AND FACTS ABSENT A VIOLATION OF LAW MAY NOT VOTE FOR
WHOM THEY WISH BY CHANGING THE ELIGIBILITY OF POTUS.
with the same force and effect as though herein set forth at length; and that all public officers holding more
than one public officer job for pay excluding a commissioner of deeds or notary public with a fiduciary
duty attempt to change the POTUS eligibility qualifications are in conflict with A2S1C2 and
A2S1C5 and are barred from such vote as a breach of a fiduciary duty to the People of the State of
New York; and

41. That each Elector is mandated by the State of New York legislature with exclusive power afforded
by A2S1C2 and A2S1C5 with use of New York State Election Law and related rules, McPherson v. Blacker,
146 U.S. 1 (1892), with the proviso that no Public Official may change the eligibility and or qualification
requirements of a federal officer including that of office of POTUS, U.S. Term Limits, Inc. v. Thornton, 514
U.S. 779 (1995) as apply to each respondent below:
42. That Respondent Robert Duffy is the incumbent 76th Lieutenant Governor of New York to
participate as a member of the State of New York electoral college
43. That Respondent Keith L.T. Wright is a incumbent Member of the New York State Assembly
from the 70th district to participate as a member of the State of New York electoral college
44. That Respondent Stephanie Miner is a incumbent 53rd Mayor of the city of Syracuse New York to
45. That Respondent Sheila Comar is a incumbent elected Executive committee chair of the New York
State Democratic Committee to participate as a member of the State of New York electoral college
46. That Respondent Joseph Morelle is a incumbent member of the New York State Assembly
representing the 132nd Assembly District, which includes eastern portions of the City of Rochester and the
Monroe County suburbs of Irondequoit and Brighton to participate as a member of the State of New York
electoral college
47. That Respondent Christine C. Quinn is a incumbent Speaker of the New York City Council
representing District 3 to participate as a member of the State of New York electoral college
48. That Respondent Ruben Diaz, Jr. is a incumbent President of the Borough of the Bronx in New
York City to participate as a member of the State of New York electoral college
49. That Respondent Ken Jenkins is a incumbent Westchester County 16th District legislator, and was
elected again Chairman of The Board of Legislators to participate as a member of the State of New York
electoral college
50. That Respondent Steve Bellone is a incumbent Suffolk County Executive to participate as a
member of the State of New York electoral college

51. That Respondent Felix Ortiz is a incumbent representing New York's 51st Assembly District to
52. That Respondent Anne Marie Anzalone is a incumbent appointed Chief of staff to Representative
Joe Crowley of the 7th New York Congressional District to participate as a member of the State of New
York electoral college
53. That Respondent William Thompson is a incumbent selected by the NYS Governor to head NYC's
Battery Park City Authority to participate as a member of the State of New York electoral college
54. That Respondent Scott Stringer is a incumbent 26th Borough President of Manhattan to participate
as a member of the State of New York electoral college
55. That Respondent Bill DeBlasio is a incumbent New York City elected official, holding the citywide
office of New York City Public Advocate to participate as a member of the State of New York electoral
college
56. That Respondent Byron Brown is a incumbent mayor of Buffalo, New York to participate as a
57. That Respondent Gerald D. Jennings is a incumbent mayor of Albany, New York to participate as
a member of the State of New York electoral college
58. That Respondent Archie Spigner is a incumbent District Leader for the 29th A.D. - Part A, and
Executive Member of the Guy R. Brewer United Democratic Club to participate as a member of the State of
New York electoral college
59. That although the following public officers are being questionably protected by the enormity of
Justice Schack invidious infringement of Petitioner basic rights otherwise protected by the US Constitution
and 14th Amendment guarantees and related State law with an order and decision taken on appeal case 20125515 filing pending, the following public officers would be effected by a Court decision herein as follows:
a. That Andrew M. Cuomo is a incumbent 56th Governor of New York to participate as a member
of the State of New York electoral college and was notified of POTUS ineligibility as the NYS
Attorney General and an elector in the 2008 Electoral College proceeded to vote.

b. That Tom DiNapoli is a incumbent 54th Comptroller of the state of New York to participate as a
member of the State of New York electoral college and was notified of POTUS ineligibility as
the NYS Attorney General and an elector in the 2008 Electoral College proceeded to vote.
c. That Sheldon Silver is a incumbent Member of the New York State Assembly from the 64th
district and speaker of the assembly to participate as a member of the State of New York
electoral college and was notified of POTUS ineligibility as the NYS Attorney General and an
elector in the 2008 Electoral College proceeded anyway to vote.
d. That Eric Schneiderman is a incumbent 65th Attorney General of New York to participate as a
60. That all the above named Public Officer Respondents as the body and or its officers with
the expressed exception of private US Citizens as electors that failed or are about to perform a duty
enjoined upon it by the law of the land as to the requirement to conform to U.S. Constitution Article
2 Section 1 Paragraph 5 as to the eligibility requirements for any candidate for the office of the
POTUS; and
61. That the named Respondents as the body and or its officers that proceeded, and is
proceeding or is about to proceed without or in excess of jurisdiction to allow violation of NBC

Eligibility ; and
62. That the named Respondents as the body and or its officers that proceeded, and is
proceeding or is about to proceed despite the warning of the misprision of felony sedition and
treason are to be referred for criminal investigation and removal from office under New York Civil
Service Law Section 105;
63. That Respondent public officers as Elector Public Officers have duty as to matter of law and facts
and when in violation of law must be held accountable or would infringe the trust due the People of New
York as similarly to Petitioners right to suffrage, republican form of government, Freedom and Liberty.

AS AND FOR THE SIXTH QUESTION AS TO PUBLIC OFFICERS WHO AS THE
ELECTOR PRIVATE PERSON WITHOUT ANOTHER PUBLIC OFFICE AS AN
ELECTOR PUBLIC OFFICER ALSO HAVE DUTY AS TO MATTERS OF LAW
AND FACTS BUT ABSENT A VIOLATION OF LAW MAY VOTE FOR WHOM
THEY WISH.
with the same force and effect as though herein set forth at length; and that public officers who as the
Elector private person without another public office as an Elector Public Officer also have duty as to matters
of law and facts but when absent a violation of law may vote for whom they wish.
65. That Respondent Irene Stein is a candidate past super delegate in the 2008 Democratic presidential
nomination and wife of Peter Stein the Tomkins County legislator for the 11th District to participate as a
66. That Respondent Walter Cooper is a candidate in an individual capacity as a citizen of New York
to participate as a member of the State of New York electoral college
67. The Elector private person as a US Citizen without another public office as an Elector Public Officer
also have duty as to matter of law and facts and when in violation of law must be held accountable or would
infringe the trust due the People of New York as similarly to Petitioners right to suffrage, republican form of
governement, Freedom and Liberty.
WHEREFORE, Petitioner wishes a temporary restraining order, preliminary injunction

hearing, and Declaratory judgment under CPLR 7806 and permanent injunction against the
Respondents of each category and such other relief as the Court deems just including a TRO Order:
a. A hearing on the legal issues as to the void ab initio US Senate Election in New York..
b. A hearing on the issues of facts as to forgery, sedition and treason.
c. A hearing on the issues of the actual historical meaning of Natural Born Citizen held by
the State of New York from before and after the 1776
'-4'
d. That Public Officers elected to Congress and as a public officer electors be barred from
reviewing the elector votes in keeping to the mandates of the law of the land
e. That based upon a review of the facts associated with the forgery of public documents to
facilitate usurpation of the office of POTUS that Electors be given notice of their being
held as an accessory after the fact to a forgery crime that would be referred for criminal
proceeding.
f. That based upon a review of the facts associated with the allegation of misprision of
felony sedition and treason that Electors be given notice of their being held as an
accessory after the fact to a felony, sedition and warned of treason per se crime that
would be referred for criminal proceeding.
g. That electors be instructed as to the actual historical meaning of Natural Born Citizen
held by the state' of New York from before and after the 1776 issuance of the
Declaration of Independence and with the proviso that were a Public Officer other than
an independent elector per se to attempt to change the eligibility of a federal offrcer
would be held in civil contempt in breach of public officer duties.
h. And for further and different relief as the Court may deem necessary herein.
Dated:
Brooklyn, New York

November
2012
/+
Christopher-Earl: Strunk, in esse, Petitioner

self-represent without being an attorney
593 Vanderbilt Avenue #28 1,
(845)90 1-6767 E-mail: chris@strunk.ws

PETITION VERIFICATION AFFIDAVIT
STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF KINGS
)
) ss.
)
Accordingly, I, Christopher-Earl: Strunk in esse, being duly sworn, depose and say under penalty of
perjury:
I have read the foregoing Petition with six (6) questions at issue against each category of
Respondent Public Officers and ~lectors'in their official capacity and or individually as against the
unlawful misadministration and misapplication of New York Public Officers in the conduct of the
General Election of November 6,201 2 in the election of US Senator Kirsten Gillibrand that is void
ab initio, and in which Petitioner wishes a writ of prohibition with Temporary Restraining Order
and permanent injunction with a Declaratory Judgment equity relief under jurisdiction of the CPLR
Article 78 in conjunction with the New York State Election Law Article $16-100 requires
emergency equity relief with a CPLR $7805 injunction with stay of New York Electoral College
vote due by December 15,2012, and a declaratory judgment under CPLR $7806 as time is of the
essence with irreparable harm; the same is true to my own knowledge, except as to the matters
therein stated to be alleged on information and belief, and as to those matters I believe it to be true.
The grounds of my beliefs as to all matters not stated upon information and belief are as follows: 3rd
parties, books and records, and personal knowledge.
26%
--'
S w o r n t o before me
,.
-.
-.
-_
_
-
I
-
ARNOLD 1. TlSHFlELD '-Notary Public State Of New YO;~"

-
..
,-
:-
N0.41-4611662
Qualified In Queens County
Certified in Kings County
Commission Expires March 30, 20
,-
SUPREME COURT OF TIIE STATE OF NEW YORK

Christopher-Earl : Strunk in esse
593 Vanderbilt Avenue - 281 Brooklyn New York 11238
Index No.:
Petitioner,
Scott Stringer of 155 West 71st Street, #3A --New York, NY 10023
George Gresham 1313 East 233rd Sheet -- Bronx, NY 10466
Steve Bellone 107 Vanderbilt Avenue -- West Babylon, NY 11704 .
Kirsten Gillibrand with DC Oflice 478 Russell Washington, DC 205 10
NOTICE OF PETITION
PETITION
PETITION VERIFICATION AFFIDAVIT
self-represent without being an attorney

593 Vanderbilt Avenue #281,
(845) 901-6767 E-mail: chris@,strunk.ws

Christopher Earl Strunk in esse
Petitioner
1.
2.
3.


Ruben Diaz, Jr. of 820 Boyton Avenue, #6D -- Bronx, NY 1W73
9. Robert D u e 164 Croydon Road -- Rochester, NY 14610
10. Joseph Morelle of 133 Deerfield Drive -- Rochester, NY 14609
r
cK Koaa -- wear
5.
6.
7.
8.
--
N-nar15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
2 1.
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
27.
28.
29.
IV,K
Keith L.T. Wright of 2225 Fifth Avenue --New York, NY 10037

Ken Jenkins 108
Avenue -- Yonkers, NY 107 10
ush he^
jo~ ( l h G
~I L
p& I B ) Z ~ N
DCQFRCG
D
q@ &rJaL
Respondents
w &S~/rvGm(3
PL
NOTICE OF INTENT TO FILE AN ARTICLE 78 PETITION WITH AN ORDER TO SHOW

CAUSE APPLICATION FOR A PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION PENDING A
Please take notice of Petitioner's intent to file an order to show cause application a t the Kings
County Supreme Court Building at 11 AM on the 10th Floor intake a t 360 Adams Street on Monday
November 19, 2012 for a preliminary injunction relief pending a declaratory judgment on issues of
law; e.g., Are public officers to be held liable as accessories to felonies in usurpation of Office of
POTUS and Ballot access? Are public officers presented with the facts of Barack Obarna ineligibility
able to change qualifications before the Electoral College Vote scheduled December 15, 2012?
For further information Contact :
Www
.=\
j~*~leo.
r/
~7977-7

593 Yanderbilf Avenue - 281
Cellphone: 845-901-6767
Strunk
v Jeffries
et al. Article 78 NYSSC for Kings County Index No.; 21948 / 2012
AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE
STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF ULSTER
) ss.
Accordingly,
a.
b.
c.
I, H. William Van Allen, being duly sworn, depose and say under penalty of perjury:
Am over 18 years of age and not a party to this action.

My place of business is located at 351 North Road Hurley New York 12243.
On November 14, 2012, Christopher Strunk instructed me to serve a true conformed copy of the NOTICE OF
PETITION, PETITION with AFFIDAVIT OF VERIFICATION affirmed November 13,2012 along with a
NOTICE OF INTENT TO FILE AN ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE APPLICATION FOR A PRELIMINARY

INJUNCTION PENDING A DECLARATORY INJUNCTION ON ISSUE OF LAW AS TO ELECTORS
DECLARATORY RELIEF AS TO ELECTORS, a Notice of Petitioner's intent to file an order to show cause
d.
application at the Kings County Supreme Court Building at 10 AM on the 10th Floor intake at 360 Adams Street on
Monday November 19,2012 placing a complete set in a properly addressed to each respondent listed below for
delivery by USPS by certified mail with request for return receipt for proof of service.
On November 14, 2012, I caused each copy with proper postage for service by certified mail on the listed Electors and
where each envelope was properly addressed with the Notification "URGENT LEGAL SERVICE" and "PERSONAL &
CONFIDENTIAL" in the lower left hand corner of the envelop that was then deposited with the USPS for service upon:
1. Hakeem Jeffries 35
2. Grace Meng ofl47l4
3.
Underhill Avenue, #2A -- Brooklyn, NY 11238
34th Avenue -- Flushing, NY 11354

4.
5.
Bill DeBlasio of 442 lith Street -- Brooklyn. NY 11215

Walter Cooper 150 West 96th Street, #[2G -- New York. NY 10025
6. Keith L.T. Wright of2225 Fifth Avenue -- New York. NY 10037
7. Christine C. Quinn of263 Ninth Avenue. #3A -- New York, NY 10001
8. William Thompson of 106 West 121st Street -- New York. NY 10027
9. Scott Stringer of 155 West 71st Street. #3A -- New York, NY 10023
10. Emily Giske 01'440 West 24th Street -- New York, NY 10014
11. Anne Marie Anzaloue 2827 48th Street -- Astoria. NY 11103
12. Archie Spigner of 11210 175th Street -- Jamaica, N'r' 11433
13. George Gresham 1313 East 233rd Street -- Bronx, NY 10466
14. Ruben Diaz, Jr. of820 Boyton Avenue. #6D -- Bronx. NY 10473
15. Ken Jenkins 108 Bushey Avenue -- Yonkers. NY 10710
16. Mario Cilento 3 Isabel Road -- Orangeburg, NY 10962
17. Gerald D. Jennings of 1135 New Scotland Road -- Albany. NY 12208
18. Byron Brown 14 Blaine Street -- Buffalo, NY 14208
19. Robert Duffy 164 Croydon Road -- Rochester, NY 14610
21. Scott Adams of 11 Poplar Avenue -- Orchard Park, NY 14127
22. Stephanie Miner 102 Woodside Drive -- Syracuse, NY 13224
23. Steve Bellone 107 Vanderbilt Avenue -- West Babylon, NY 11704
24. Irene Stein 101 Brandywine Drive -- Ithaca, NY 14850
25. Sheila Comar 29 Depot Street -- Middle Granville, NY 12849;
26. Kirsten Gillibrand with DC Office 478 Russell Washington, DC 20510
CM I RR No 7012101000068749741
CM I RR No 7012101000068749819
CM I RR No 7012101000068749758
CM
CM
CM
CM
CM
CM
I RR No
I RR No
I RR No
I RR No
IRR No
I RR No
7012101000068749765
7012101000068749956
7012101000068749826
7012101000068749833
7012101000068749840
7012101000068749857
CM
CM
CM
CM
I RR
I RR
IRR
I RR
7012101000068749864
7012101000068749901
7012101000068750242
7012101000068749963
No
No
No
No
CM I RR No 7012101000068749796
CM I RR No
CM I RR No
CM I RR No
CM I RR No
CM IRR No
CM I RR No
CM I RR No
CM I RR No
CM I RR No
CM I RR No
CM I RR No
7012101000068749949
7012101000068749895
7012101000068749970
7012101000068749802
7012101000068749772
7012101000068749789
7012101000068749871
7012101000068749888
7012101000068749918
7012101 000068749925
7012101000068749932
C"!Rl'N~':'00006R7499R7
/#~
/;l.v~2r;;/
Sworn to before me
This i
day of November
~<-Drl
tary Pubhc
~k.o-~
rlliam
2012
JUDITHS.MA YHON
STAT; OF NEW YORK
NO.01MA60B5585
QUALIFIED IN ULSTER COUNTY/'(j
NOTARYPUBUC,
COMMISSION EXPIRES JUt Y 14, 20__
Van Allen
3-
WflOKLYN NY 11238
P-
Postage $
$0.85
031%
---
e,.
1
rc
EO
RUSHING NY 11354
Postage $
.rl
$1.50
0319
Cellifled Fee
0
Retum Receipt Fee
0 (Endorsement Required)
Relum Receipt Fee

(Endorsemenl Requlred)
(EndorsementRequired)

+I
0
A
Total Postage & Fe
Hakeem Jeffries
35 Underhill Avenue, #2A -Brooklyn, NY 1 1238
Total Postage & F-
Flushing, NY 1 1354
Civ, State. ZIP+4
-.-.-------..-.----.-
1
I
...--..-...-.------.-
Postage
Jl
Certified Fee
0
D
a
u
..
Return Receipt Fee

(EndorsementRequired)
1 Sent To
city, Sl8@ ZJPM
Felix Ortiz
189 B 33rd Street -Brooklyn, NY 1 1232
.---------------.----.
---------**---'-----.
442 l lth Street -city,

state,z,P+r
-,
Return Receipt Fee

(Endorsemenl Required)
Retum Receipt Fee
[=I

~ ~ o o k l yNY
n , 11215
.-.--.-..-.-.---.---.-..-..-.. ----..-..-..,.--.
Return Receipt Fee

(Endorsernent Required)
..
Christine C. Quinn
263 Ninth Avenue, # 3 --~ ................
................
Clly.State, ZIP
New York, NY 10001
I--
Postage $
Cert~fledFee
Postage $
Cerllfied Fee
0
0
Return Rece~ptFee
0 (Endorsement Requ~red)
- -7
Return Receipt Fee

O (Endorsement Required)
Restricted Del.wery Fee

(Endorsement Requ~red)

I4
i
l
i
l
0
Fl
Scott Stringer
i
l ................
155 West 7 1 st Street, #3A ...................
New York, NY 10023
..................
CiM State, ZIP-
Emily Giske
440 West 24th Street -New York, NY 10014 ...................
..................
City. State, ZIPt4
Postage
Certified Fee
II
$2.95
Cerllfled Fee
dW
Return Receipt Fee

Return Recelpt Fee


Restricted Delive~yFee
+I
0 Total Postage & Fees
i
l
1 Sent To
/ Sent To
F;:
""
""""
"""
or PO Box No.
1lLIU
IJb'L
--IuVL
Jamaica,NY 11433
.......................
820 Boyton Avenue, #6D -- .-----------Bronx, NY 10473
Return Rece~ptFee
Return Receipt Fee
Restricted Dellvery Fee

-- & Fees
Total Postage
Total Postage &
Ken Jenkins
108 Bushey Avenue -Yonkers, NY 10710
ciry,state, ZIP+^
--.-------,--.
3-
$2.d3-%2%>x
- 1$
1
Gerald
D. Jennings
-&-- - ;.- - - - - - - - - - -
;
I
1 Sent To
1135 New Scotland Road -..-------- - -----.

---.-.----.------..Albany, NY 12208
Ciu State, ZlF+4
'.y
RestrictedDeliery Fee
--
0319
Return Receipt Fee

$4. 60~:-
TOW Postage & Fees
-.- . %+?:
.
i
Certified Fee
P
$1.30
Postage $
...-----.---------
-Y
Return Receipt Fee

~ ~a0.;
t .
or PO Box No.
EWFALO NY 14208
P-
postage $
Certified Fee
-:Eji4;m2
=()
Mario Cilento
3 Isabel Road -Orangeburg, NY 10962
,--------------
I$
1$
$6. M)
111/14zil2
Byron Brown
14 Blaine Street -Buffalo, NY 14208 .-------"-----.--.'-----.
Postage $
$1.30
HIlllLE GRANVILLE NY 1349
O'T~Q
031?
Jl
Celtltied Fee
0
0
Return Recelpt Fee

(Endorsement RequlNd)
Restrlcted Delwery Fee

a
0
Total Pcstage & Fees

--
A
0
-------..._--__.__
Clty, State, ZIP+4
rm
d
l
11.30
Postage $
Q
dl
Certif~edFee
Certified Fee
Relum Recmp?Fee
(Endorsement Requvred)
Retum Recelpt Fee


A 3iii?x3rN6;!------ Irene Stein

101 Brandywine Drive
0 o r P 0 BoxNo.
p- ----..---*-----..------.
at^,
'
stale. ZIP+4
Ithaca, NY 14850
..
1
Restrlcted Delhrety Fee

Total Postage a Fees
.--.-------.---.
-.
*
Steve Bellone
Certlfled Fee
0
0
R m m Receipt,Fee
O (Endorsement Required)
a RestrictedDelhrBty Fee
1-
i??7ZI.;;$y:;zErive ...-------------.-~rieet,~ p t NO.:

.
or PO BOX NO.
Cifx state, Z I P + ~
syracuse,
NY 13224
107 Vanderbilt Avenue -West Babylon, NY 1 l 704
-- .----.---,-.
"..
- - - - - - - - .- -..- .-- -- - -
1 $ -312
s-,e-t:-Jji:-fib:,r.-----
Scott Adarns
1I Poplar Avenue --
PO BOX NO.
.-----------------.orCity,
- -...
-...... -.. Orchard Park, NY 14127
Stale, ZIP+^
A
.
.
.
.
.
---.------
3
P
Certified Fee
Return Receipt Fee
ROCHESTER NY 14619
cO
Jl
Postage
Certified Fee
Return Recelpt Fee
C3
RestrictedDelively Fee
JosephMorelle
OrPO Box No.

-...
.....--....-. 133 Deerfield Drive -CiM ~%8te,ZIPRochester, NY 14609
.-
Reslricfed Dellvery Fee

(Endorsement Reqared)
1 Sent To
,H
1$
$6.60
Tn-/.fi/~iz
.__..____i_.._.____-------------------------.-Robert Duffj.
...------------------.----
Civ, state. z/P+4
164 Croydon Road -Rochester, NY 14610
-.....------.---.------

-----------------------------------------------------------------------x
Index No.: 21948 / 2012


Petitioner,

Respondents.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------x

Exhibit 3
STATE OF NEW YORK

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
ERIC T. SCHNEIDERMAN
ATTORNEY GENERAL
KENT T. STAUFFER
EXECUTIVE DEPUTY ATTORNEY GENERAL
DIVISION OF STATE COUNSEL
LISA R. DELL
ASSISTANT ATTORNEY GENERAL IN CHARGE
LITIGATION BUREAU
November 16, 2012
Clerk of Court
Supreme Court, Kings County
360 Adams Street
Brooklyn, NY 11201
Re:
Christopher Earl Strunk
Dear Sir or Madam:

I write because Christopher Earl Strunk has stated in the attached that he intends to file an
Order To Show Cause against, inter alia, Governor Andrew Cuomo, Attorney General Eric
Schneiderman, and Comptroller Tom DiNapoli, regarding their casting votes at the Electoral
College for President Barak Obama. The attached Order enjoins Mr. Strunk from filing any
further actions in the Unified Court System against any of these three people. Moreover, the
subject matter of Mr. Strunks threatened new litigation is precisely the same as that of the
previous litigation that resulted in the attached Order. Thus, Mr. Strunk should not be permitted
to file his Order To Show Cause.
Respectfully submitted,
Joshua Pepper
Assistant Attorney General
120 BROADWAY, NEW YORK N.Y. 10271-0332 PHONE (212) 416-8610 FAX (212) 416-6075 *NOT FOR SERVICE OF PAPERS
HTTP://WWW.AG.NY.GOV

-----------------------------------------------------------------------x
Index No.: 21948 / 2012


Petitioner,

Respondents.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------x

Exhibit 4
Strunk v Jeffries et al. Article 78 W S S C for Kings kounty Index No.; 21 948 / 2012
STATE OF NEW.YORK
COUNTY OF KINGS
Accordingly, I,
)
) ss.
)
Rou&e e@
~ALC
,being duly sworn, depose and say under penalty of pejury:
a. Am over 1 8 years of age a n d not a party t o t h i s action.

b. My place of business is located at
c.
6J5 k?Mc1 1 2
O n November 3 0 , 2 0 1 2 , Christopher S t r u n k instructed m e t o serve a true conformed copy of t h e PETITIONER'S

SECOND AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT OF OSC with EXHIBITS annexed AFFIRMED November 30,2012 along with a copy
of t h e NOTICE OF PETITION, PETITION with AFFIDAVIT OF VERIFICATION affirmed November 1 3 , 2 0 1 2
placing a complete s e t i n a properly addressed envelope to e a c h respondent listed below for delivery by USPS regular
mail.
d. O n November 3 0 , 2 0 1 2 , I caused e a c h copy with proper postage for service by first class mail o n t h e listed Electors And
where e a c h envelope w a s properly addressed with t h e Notification "URGENT LEGAL SERVICE" a n d 'PERSONAL &
CONFIDENTJAL" i n t h e lower left h a n d c o m e r of the envelop t h a t w a s then deposited with the USPS for service upon:
7. Hakeern Jeffi-ies 35 Underhill Avenue, #2A -- Brooklyn, N Y 11238
8. Bill DeBlasio of 442 1lth Street -- Brooklyn, NY 11215
11. Tom DiNapoli 100 Great Neck Road -- Great Neck, NY 11201
14. Sheldon Silver of 550 Grand Street, #5A -- New York,,NY 10002
17. William Thompson of 106 West 121st Street --New York, NY 10027
18. Scott Stringer of 155 West 71st Street, #3A --New York, NY 10023
20. Scott Adams of 11 Poplar Avenue -- Orchard Park, NY 14127 21. Stephanie Miner 102 Woodside Drive -- Syracuse, NY 13224
23. Anne Marie Anzalone 2827 48th Street -- Astoria, NY 11103
24. Grace Meng of 14714 34th Avenue -- Flushing, NY 11354
28. Sheila Comar 29 Depot Street -- Middle Granville, NY 12849
29. Ken Jenkins 108 Bushey Avenue -- Yonkers, NY 10710
30. Joshua Pepper NYSAssiatant Attorney General Office of Attorney General 120 Broadway NY NY 10171
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
31
KLQ>T
t t b~ t V r c / @ ~ 'JfaBW
Notary PJe]i'c
*.
'
KAMAL P. SON\
Notary Public, State of New York
No. 01SO6089949
Qualified in Kings C0unly
Commission Expires March 31.2015
$Ff=lC@rcCyb
K
~ ~ S ~ L~ ~WWTHI G

-----------------------------------------------------------------------x
Index No.: 21948 / 2012


Petitioner,

Respondents.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------x

Exhibit 5
-----------------------------------------------------------------------x
Index No.: 21948 / 2012
Christopher-Earl : Strunk in esse
Filed November 14, 2012
Petitioner,
Joseph Morelle; Scott Adams ; Stephanie Miner; Steve Bellone;
Respondents.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------x
STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF KINGS
PETITIONERS
AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT OF
NOTE OF ISSUE WITH
CERTIFICATE OF READINESS
FOR TRIAL OF ISSUES AND
FOR PARTIAL SEVERANCE
)
) ss.
)
Accordingly, I, Christopher-Earl: Strunk in esse, being duly sworn, depose and say under penalty of perjury:
To:
Hon. David I. Schmidt J.S.C. Part 1,

Hon. Arthur M. Schack J.S.C. Part 27,
1. This is Petitioners affidavit in support of his note of issue and certificate of readiness by CPLR 3402
for a trial of issues by December 14, 2012 with partial severance for the benefit of captioned Respondent
electors of the New York State Legislatures Electoral College and members of Congress before the deadline
to vote by December 17, 2012, and after January 3, 2013 for candidates for the office of President of the
United States, and that whether by casting a vote for Barack Obama each may be charged with the crime of
accessory after the fact of a felony committed on or about 25 April 2011 by persons as yet named, aided and
abetted by White House Counsel Bob Bauer, White House Press Secretary Jay Carney and Barack Obama who
during the 27 April 2012 White House Press Conference, see the transcript evidence herein (see Exhibit 1),
expressly presented a forged instrument to the People of the United States, a crime compounded by spoliation,
concealment, perjury, tampering with the public record, intimidation of witnesses and other crimes.
Christopher-Earl: Strunks Affidavit in support of Note of Issue Page 1 of 3
TRIAL OF THE FACTS
2. That Petitioner requires a trial of the facts of a crime before December 17, 2012 essential for the
proper execution of the Electoral College vote, say on December 13, 2012, and at which Petitioner will bring
only one expert witness for testimony by Typographer Graphics Expert Paul Edward Irey from Delray Beach
Florida to testify solely as to the nature of the forgery referenced above without determination of who the
perpetrators are per se, as that is a criminal matter for authorities with jurisdiction.
3. That expert testimony by Paul Edward Irey is based upon the Affidavit with Exhibits A through D
affirmed December 4, 2012, and herewith (see Exhibit 2) that is res ipso loquitur.
4. Petitioner contends that the body of the crime complained of has been brought to the attention of
Respondents and various district attorneys with authority and jurisdiction to further investigate, and that the
testimony deals with the fact that in 1961, well before computers or such other technologies that may be in use
today, that ANY birth certificate paperwork was done either by hand and or on forms designed for use with the
mechanical typewriter technology that was then widely used, rendering a forgery detectible; and that testimony
presents the proof of forgery in the context of then mechanical technology in use, and also to prove the forged
instrument is of current manufacturer, that the forgers use of the Unsharp Mask software by Adobe to create a
Halo around lettering thus also sets the chain of custody of the forgery along with where it was manufactured.
5. That Respondent public officers as if Elector Public Officers and private US Citizens have duty as to
matters of law and facts and when in violation of law must be held accountable or would infringe the trust due
the People of New York as similarly to Petitioners right to suffrage, republican form of government, Freedom
and Liberty, any elelctor who would commit a crimne by adiding and abbetting a felony is incompatibkle. as to
New York State law as applies to the public officer oath, duties and obligation with use of NYS Civil Service
Law 105A and is to be barred as a person holding an office of trust or profit under the United States.
6. That it is a well-settled common law rule that a public officer cannot hold two incompatible offices
simultaneously (Matter of Smith v Dillon, 267 App. Div. 39, 43 [1943]). This rule seeks to prevent offices of
public trust from accumulating in a single individual. Two offices are incompatible if one is subordinate to the
other or there is an inherent inconsistency between the two offices (see People ex rel. Ryan v Green, 58 NY
Christopher-Earl: Strunks Affidavit in support of Note of Issue Page 2 of 3
Christopher-Earl: Strunks AFFIDAVIT in support of Note of Issue
Exhibit 1
Press Gaggle by Press Secretary Jay Carney, 4/27/2011 | The White House
http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2011/04/27/press-gaggle-press-secretary-jay-carne...
What was really dominating a lot of discussion was this fake controversy, essentially, a sideshow, that was
distracting from this real issue. And an example of that would be when major Democrats and Republicans went onto
mainstream news organizations to talk about their budget plans -- including the President -- they were asked about
this. They were asked about what they thought about the controversy. They were asked if they believed the
President was born in the United States. And it was really a distraction.
Get Email Updates
That really struck the President, led him to ask his counsel to look into whether we could ask the state of Hawaii
to release the long-form certificate, which is not something they generally do. And he did that despite the fact that it
probably was not in his long-term -- it would have been in his -- probably in his long-term political interests to allow
this birther debate to dominate discussion in the Republican Party for months to come. But he thought even though
it might have been good politics, he thought it was bad for the country. And so he asked counsel to look into this.
Contact Us
Search WhiteHouse.gov
Home Briefing Room Press Briefings
The White House

Office of the Press Secretary
And now Ill have Bob explain that, and then well take your questions.
For Immediate Release
MR. CARNEY: I just want to -- sorry, I meant to mention at the top, as some of you may have seen, the
President will be coming to the briefing room at 9:45 a.m., making a brief statement about this -- not taking
questions, but just wanted to let you know.
April 27, 2011
Press Gaggle by Press Secretary Jay Carney, 4/27/2011

James S. Brady Press Briefing Room
MR. PFEIFFER: And he will use this as an opportunity to make a larger point about what this debate says about
our politics.
8:48 A.M. EDT

MR. CARNEY: Good morning, everybody. You can read the paperwork we just handed out in a minute. Let me
just get started. Thank you for coming this morning. I have with me today Dan Pfeiffer, the Presidents Director of
Communications, as well as Bob Bauer, the Presidents White House Counsel, who will have a few things to say
about the documents we handed to you today. And then we'll take your questions. I remind you this is off camera
and only pen and pad, not for audio. And I give you Dan Pfeiffer.
Go ahead, Bob.
MR. BAUER: Early last week the decision was made to review the legal basis for seeking a waiver from the
longstanding prohibition in the state Department of Health on releasing the long-form birth certificate. And so we
undertook a legal analysis and determined a waiver request could be made that we had the grounds upon which to
make that request.
March 11, 2012 8:04 PM EDT
MR. PFEIFFER: Thanks, Jay. What you have in front of you now is a packet of papers that includes the
Presidents long-form birth certificate from the state of Hawaii, the original birth certificate that the President
requested and we posted online in 2008, and then the correspondence between the Presidents counsel and the
Hawaii State Department of Health that led to the release of those documents.
And by Thursday of last week, I spoke to private counsel to the President and asked her to contact the State
Department of Health and to have a conversation about any requirements, further requirements, that they thought
we had to satisfy to lodge that waiver request. She had that conversation with the state Department of Health on
Thursday -- counsel in question is Judy Corley at the law firm of Perkins Coie, and you have a copy of the letter she
subsequently sent to the department with the Presidents written request.
If you would just give me a minute to -- indulge me a second to walk through a little of the history here, since all
of you weren't around in 2008 when we originally released the Presidents birth certificate, I will do that. And then
Bob Bauer will walk through the timeline of how we acquired these documents.
The department outlined the requirements for the President to make this request. He signed a letter making that
request on Friday afternoon upon returning from the West Coast. And private counsel forwarded his written request
-- written, signed request -- along with a letter from counsel, to the state Department of Health on Friday.
3 of 15
Call with President Karzai Following the

Report of Afghan Civilian Casualties
President Obama reached
out to President Karzai
Sunday following the
reported killing and
sounding of Afghan
civilians.
March 11, 2012 9:00 AM EDT
In 2008, in response to media inquiries, the Presidents campaign requested his birth certificate from the state of
3/11/2012 11:00 PM
B L O G PO ST S ON T H I S I SS UE
From the Archives: Tsunami in Japan
1 of 15
3/11/2012 11:00 PM
The department, as I understood it, after reviewing the law and reviewing the grounds asserted in the request,
came to the conclusion that a waiver could be appropriately granted. We were advised that the long-form birth
certificate could be copied and made available to us as early as Monday, April 25th -- the day before yesterday. And
we made arrangements for counsel to travel to Honolulu to pick it up and it was returned to the White House
yesterday afternoon.
Let me emphasize again, there is a specific statute that governs access to and inspection of vital records in the
state of Hawaii. The birth certificate that we posted online is, in fact, and always has been, and remains, the legal
birth certificate of the President that would be used for all legal purposes that any resident of Hawaii would want to
use a birth certificate for.
Hawaii. We received that document; we posted it on the website. That document was then inspected by
independent fact checkers, who came to the campaign headquarters and inspected the document -- independent
fact checkers did, and declared that it was proof positive that the President was born in Hawaii.
A look back at the U.S. response to the devastating

earthquake and tsunami that hit Japan in March of
2011.
To be clear, the document we presented on the Presidents website in 2008 is his birth certificate. It is the piece
of paper that every Hawaiian receives when they contact the state to request a birth certificate. It is the birth
certificate they take to the Department of Motor Vehicles to get their drivers license and that they take to the federal
government to get their passport. It is the legally recognized document.
Weekly Address: Investing in a Clean

Energy Future
That essentially -- for those of you who followed the campaign closely know that solved the issue. We didnt
spend any time talking about this after that. There may have been some very fringe discussion out there, but as a
campaign issue it was settled and it was --
However, there is legal authority in the department to make exceptions to the general policy on not releasing the
long-form birth certificate. The policy in question, by the way, on non-release has been in effect since the
mid-1980s, I understand. So while I cannot tell you what the entire history of exceptions has been, it is a limited
one. This is one of very few that I understand have been granted for the reasons set out in private counsels letter.
When you posted this did you post the other side of it where the signature is?
MR. PFEIFFER: Yes.
March 10, 2012 6:30 AM EDT
Speaking from a factory in Virginia, President

Obama talks about how companies are creating
more jobs in the United States, making better
products than ever before, and how many are
developing new technologies that are reducing our
dependence on foreign oil and saving families
money at the pump.
VIEW ALL RELATED BLOG POSTS
MR. PFEIFFER: We'll be happy to take some questions.

Q
Q I guess I just want to make sure that were clear on this. Even though this one says certificate of live birth
on here, this is different than the other certificate of live birth that weve seen?
Because it is not here and that's been an issue.
MR. PFEIFFER: We posted both sides and when it was looked at it was looked at by -- the fact checkers came
to headquarters and actually examined the document we had.
MR. PFEIFFER: Yes. The second page there is the one that was posted on the Internet.
Q
That settled the issue. In recent weeks, the issue has risen again as some folks have begun raising a question
about the original -- about the long-form birth certificate you now have in front of you. And Bob will explain why -the extraordinary steps we had to take to receive that and the legal restraints that are in place there.
Okay.
Facebook
YouTube
Twitter
Vimeo
Flickr
iTunes
Google+
LinkedIn
MR. PFEIFFER: And that is a copy of the one that has been kept at the Hawaii Department of Health.
But it became an issue again. And it went to -- essentially the discussion transcended from the nether regions of
the Internet into mainstream political debate in this country. It became something that when both Republicans and
Democrats were talking to the media they were asked about. It was a constant discussion on mainstream news
organizations. And the President believed that it was becoming a distraction from the major issues we're having in
this country.
Q Okay. And this is the one that would be referred to -- that people have been asking for that is the birth
certificate?
MR. PFEIFFER: They are both -- the second one is the birth certificate. The one on the top is what is referred
to as the long-form birth certificate. As you can see -- and Bob can walk you through it -- it contains some additional
information that is not on the second page, which was the birth certificate which was released during the campaign.
And he was particularly struck by the fact that right after the Republicans released their budget framework and
the President released his, we were prepared to have a very important, very vigorous debate in this country about
the future of the country, the direction were going to take, how were doing to deal with very important issues like
education, Medicare, how were going to deal with taxes in this country. And that should -- thats the debate we
If you could just explain the difference.
should be having yet.
4 of 15
3/11/2012 11:00 PM
2 of 15
3/11/2012 11:00 PM
MR. PFEIFFER: There will always be some selection of people who will believe something, and that's not the
issue. The issue is that this is not a discussion that is just happening among conspiracy theorists. Its happening
here in this room; its happening on all of the networks. And its something that, as I said, every major political figure
of both parties whos actually out trying to talk about real issues is asked about this by the media. And so the
President decided to release this. And I'll leave it to others to decide whether theres still -- there will be some who
still have a different -- have a conspiracy about this.
Q
MR. BAUER: Theres a difference between a certificate and a certification. The certification is simply a
verification of certain information thats in the original birth certificate. The birth certificate, as you can see, has
signatures at the bottom from the attending physician, the local registrar, who essentially oversees the maintenance
of the records. It contains some additional information also -- that is to say, the original birth certificate -- it contains
some additional information like the ages of the parents, birthplaces, residence, street address, the name of the
hospital.
Youve got two certified copies, according to this study. You have these physical --
The core information thats required for legal purposes and that is put into the actual certification thats a
computer-generated document, which we posted in 2008, that information is abstracted, if you will, from the original
birth certificate, put into the computerized short-form certification, and made available to Hawaiian residents at their
request.
MR. PFEIFFER: Yes. I showed you one. Just one.

Q
You showed us a photocopy of one.

So the long form, which is a certificate, has more information, but the short form has the information thats legally
sufficient for all the relevant purposes.
MR. PFEIFFER: No, I showed you -Q
Does that have a stamp?
This first one has never been released publicly, correct?
MR. BAUER: Thats correct. It is in a bound volume in the records at the state Department of Health in Hawaii.
MR. PFEIFFER: It has a seal on it.

Q
Q Bob, can you explain why President Obama let this drag on for four years? Was it Donald Trump that
prompted you to issue this?
Why does this rise to the level of a presidential statement?
MR. PFEIFFER: The President -- this in itself -- when you hear the President I think youll understand the point
hes making. That will be in not too long.
MR. BAUER: Ill let Dan -MR. PFEIFFER: Sure.
Q Did the President change his own mind about this? In other words, was he advocating during the campaign
lets just put it out there and get it over with, or was this an internal shift in thinking based -- in other words, was it
the President who steadfastly during the campaign said this is ridiculous, I don't want to give this any more ground,
and has now changed his mind? Or is this the --
Q I know you expected that question, right? (Laughter.)

MR. PFEIFFER: He even said you would be the one who would ask it. (Laughter.)
MR. PFEIFFER: Lets be very clear. You were there for the campaign. There was never a question about the
original birth certificate during the campaign. It was a settled issue. I was there for the original decision to release
the birth certificate. I was there when we posted it online. I'm not sure I even knew there was an original one that
was different than the one we posted online because it wasnt an issue. So it wasnt like -- lets be very clear. We
were asked for the Presidents birth certificate in 2008; we released the Presidents birth certificate; and it was
I dont think this dragged on for four years because this was a resolved -- for those of you who remember the
campaign, this issue was resolved in 2008. And it has not been an issue, none of you have asked about it, called
about it, reported on it until the last few weeks.
done. That was it.
this whole birther debate has been really bad for the Republican Party and would probably be good for the
President politically. But despite that, the President, as I said, was struck by how this was crowding out the debate,
7 of 15
And as I said earlier, it probably would have been -- a lot of the pundits out there have talked about the fact that
3/11/2012 11:00 PM
5 of 15
And so there hasnt been a discussion about this other document for years. Its only been in the last few weeks.
And so to your second question, the President decided to do this and he'll talk about this when he gets here -decided to do it at the timeline that Bob laid out because it was a -- this was a sideshow that was distracting from
the real challenges that we're facing.
particularly around the budget, on important issues, and was an example of the sort of sideshows that our politics
focuses on instead of the real challenges that we have to confront as a country.
And so thats why he made this decision now, because it became an issue that transcended sort of this -- it
essentially was something that was talked about, as I said, from the nether regions of the Internet onto mainstream
network newscasts. In fact, Jay has been asked about this just yesterday in this room.
Its not just a sideshow for him; its a sideshow for our entire politics that have become focused on this.
Q Not to give Donald Trump more publicity than he has, but is he the person who sort of -- sort of that bridge
between what you're calling a fringe and the mainstream? Do you think that hes the reason why this tripped the
switch to a level where you now have to deal with something you thought was dealt with?
Q So I guess the implication is that you did get political advantage by having not released this until today, over
the course of the last four years?
MR. PFEIFFER: There has been -- no one that I can recall actually asked us to -- we were asked to release the
Presidents birth certificate in 2008. We did that. And then no one -- it never -- up until a few weeks ago, there was
never an issue about that that wasnt the birth certificate from any credible individual or media outlet. And it hasnt
been until -- I mean, Jay was asked about this yesterday --
MR. PFEIFFER: Its not for me to say why mainstream media organizations began to cover this debate. Theyll
have to answer that for themselves.
Q
3/11/2012 11:00 PM
How concerned were you about running against Donald Trump in a general election?
Q
When you say that, you mean certification -- you released the certification?
MR. PFEIFFER: I'd refer any questions on the election to the campaign.
Q
MR. PFEIFFER: When any Hawaiian wants -- requests their birth certificate because they want to get a drivers
license, they want to get a passport, they do exactly what the President did in 2008. And thats what that is. And we
released that. And thats what any Hawaiian would do to release their birth certificate. And that was good enough
for everyone until very recently this became a question again. And so the President made this decision. Hell talk to
you more about his thinking on that.
Can you address the reports of Petraeus to the CIA and DOD --
MR. PFEIFFER: You get points for that, Carol. (Laughter.)

MR. CARNEY: Yes. I don't have -- but youll be disappointed to learn that I don't have a personnel
announcement for you. The President will be addressing this -- questions about personnel tomorrow.
Q And this is going to sound -- I mean, you can just anticipate what people are going to -- remain
unconvinced. Theyre going to say that this is just a photocopy of a piece of paper, you could have typed anything
in there. Will the actual certificate be on display or viewable at any -- (laughter.)
Q Dan, was there a debate about whether or not this deserved being discussed by the White House, whether
or not -- and I'm going back to the birth certificate. I lose points, I understand. But was there debate about whether
or not this was worthy of the White House?
Q
MR. PFEIFFER: The point I'd make is that we weren't the ones who -- we're not the first ones to bring this up in
this room. Jay has been asked questions about this; the President has been asked about it in media interviews.
And so that wasnt a decision that we made, and the President made the decision to do this and he made the
decision to -- and when he comes down here this morning he'll talk to you about why he thinks theres an important
point to be made here.
MR. BAUER: And youll see the letter from the director of the Health Department that states that she oversaw
the copy and is attesting to --
Q Getting back to the personnel announcements, does the President understand that these announcements
have been made and sourced satisfactorily for most news organizations before he speaks up and hes not letting his
8 of 15
Will the President be holding it?
MR. PFEIFFER: He will not, and I will not leave it here for him to do so. But it will -- the State Department of
Health in Hawaii will obviously attest that that is a -- what they have on file. As Bob said, its in a book in Hawaii.
3/11/2012 11:00 PM
6 of 15
But do you understand that this could quiet the conspiracy theorists?
3/11/2012 11:00 PM
MR. CARNEY: I don't have anything for you on that this morning.
Q
White House corroborate?
Just quickly, back on the birth certificate, yesterday you said this was a settled issue. So --
MR. CARNEY: I don't have a comment on that for you, Bill. (Laughter.)
MR. CARNEY: Well, as Dan said, again, it has been a settled issue.
Q I mean, this is such BS. Its all out there and you guys are -- okay, the President is going to talk about this
tomorrow so we can't say anything.
MR. PFEIFFER: From a factual point of view, its absolutely a settled issue. But the fact that it was a settled
issue did not keep it from becoming a major part of the political discussion in this town for the last several weeks
here. So theres absolutely no question that what the President released in 2008 was his birth certificate and
MR. CARNEY: Bill, you're free to make phone calls everywhere you can. I'm just saying that we don't have a
personnel announcement for you today.
answered that question, and many of your organizations have done excellent reporting which proved that to be the
case. But it continued; the President thought it was a sideshow and chose to take this step today for the reasons
Bob laid out.
And he'll tomorrow, he'll cover all the aforementioned switches?
MR. CARNEY: We'll have a personnel announcement tomorrow.

Q Aside from the policy distractions that was presented, did you have some concern because it was sort of
reaching back into the mainstream news coverage that this could become a factor in the 2012 election with centrist
voters?
Q Jay, yesterday you talked about failsafe triggers as sort of a positive alternative to spending cuts. I'm
wondering if the White House has any openness to including that, because its a White House proposal, including
that in any legislation that would raise the debt ceiling limit.
MR. PFEIFFER: No.

Q
MR. CARNEY: Well, what we've said very clearly, and I think Secretary Geithner said it eloquently yesterday, it
is a dangerous, risky idea to hold hostage any other -- hold hostage, rather, raising the debt ceiling, a vote on
Just to clarify what this document is --
raising the debt ceiling, to any other piece of legislation. The commitment this President has to moving aggressively
towards a comprehensive deficit reduction plan is clear. It will be clear again when the Vice President convenes a
meeting, bipartisan, bicameral meeting, next week. And he hopes that progress will be made on that very quickly.
MR. PFEIFFER: This is the -- the letter first and the two certified copies -- this is one of those. This is the same
thing you have a copy of as the first page of your packet.
Q
How did it get here?
In terms of negotiating what that would look like, I think the negotiators should do that, led by the Vice President,
Republicans and Democrats together. But again, explicitly linking or holding hostage the absolute necessity of
raising the debt ceiling to any other piece of legislation and declaring that we'll tank the U.S. economy and perhaps
the global economy if we don't get this specific thing that we want, I think is a dangerous and unprecedented thing to
do.
MR. PFEIFFER: As Bob said, it arrived by plane -- the Presidents personal counsel went to Hawaii and brought
it back and we got it last night.
Q
Last night?
And we're confident, remain confident, that the leaders of both parties in Congress, as well as the President, will
agree with the President, as I have said many times, that we do not have an alternative to raising the debt ceiling
because, as many have said, outside observers, economists and businessmen and women, the impact of that would
be calamitous at best.
MR. PFEIFFER: Last night.

Q
What time?
MR. PFEIFFER: Between 4:00 p.m. and 5:00 p.m.
11 of 15
3/11/2012 11:00 PM
9 of 15
3/11/2012 11:00 PM
When did you decide to do this gaggle?
package?
MR. PFEIFFER: Whats that?
MR. PFEIFFER: Whatever time you received your guidance suggesting that it would be this time tomorrow
morning.
MR. CARNEY: I'm not negotiating individual pieces of a package that we hope Republicans and Democrats can
come together around from this podium. But again, we believe its essential to -- the President believes -- that's one
of the reasons why we're doing this right now -- we believe that these are big debates that need to be had. They
can be contentious, argumentative, serious, comprehensive, detailed, because theyre important; theyre all about
Americas future. And theyre about visions of this country and where we're going that need to be debated. And this
debate was being crowded out in many ways by a sideshow.
Q Are these letters supposed to demonstrate the legal steps that were involved in releasing it to the White
House counsel?
And he looks forward to having a debate on the real issues that Americans want us to talk about -- long-term
economic plans, deficit reduction, investments in the kinds of things that will help this economy grow and create
When was this gaggle put on -- when was this planned?
jobs, dealing with our energy needs, a long-term energy plan. These are all issues that have been sidetracked at
least in the public debate by some of the issues that we're talking about this morning.
MR. BAUER: The letters that you have, the personal request from the President, along with the accompanying
letter from private counsel, is merely meant to document the legal path to getting the waiver of that policy so we
could get the long-form certificate.
Q
Q Is there a concern that more and more people were actually starting to believe its sideshow -- I mean,
people have been asking about --
The waiver of Hawaii state government policy?

MR. CARNEY: I will let the President speak for himself, but what Dan was saying and I think is important is that
the issue here is that the President feels that this was bad for the country; that its not healthy for our political
debate, when we have so many important issues that Americans care about, that affect their lives, to be drawn into
sideshows about fallacies that have been disproven with the full weight of a legal document for several years.
MR. BAUER: Right. The non-release of the long-form certificate, which has been in effect since the 1980s -- a
natural question would have been, well, what did you do to obtain the waiver, and those letters represent the
request.
So, again, as Dan said, and a lot of political pundits have said, you could say that it would be good politics,
smart politics, for the President to let this play out. He cares more about whats good for the country. He wants the
debate on the issues. He wants the focus on the issues that Americans care about.
Q Well, isnt it true that anybody who was born in Hawaii can write this letter? I mean, that's all there is to the
waiver process?
MR. BAUER: No. Let me just explain once again because I also noticed, by the way, in one report already the
wrong certificate was actually posted on the website. The certificate with the signatures at the bottom -- and that's a
key difference between the short form and the long form -- the long form has signatures at the bottom from the
attending physician, the local registrar, and the mother, is the original birth certificate, which sits in a bound volume
in the State Department of Health.
Q Jay, the President yesterday said that he had been talking to oil exporters about increasing output. Who
specifically has he been talking -MR. CARNEY: Well, I said -- I want to clarify. I said several times I believe from this podium when asked
questions about our overall handling of the issue of high gas prices that we've had conversations with oil-producing
states and allies and those conversations continue. I don't have specific the President spoke with this leader or
other government officials spoke with others, but those are ongoing conversations that, of course, we would be
having in a situation like this.
The short from is a computerized abstract, and that's the legal birth certificate we requested in 2008 and that
Hawaiians are entitled to. Since the mid-1980s, the State Department of Health, for administrative reasons, only
provides to people who request their birth certificate the short form. They do not provide the long form.
Q Do you guys have any comment on the NATO soldiers that were killed in Afghanistan and any confirmation
on whether there were Americans?
So in order for us to obtain the long form, we had to have a waiver. We had to actually determine that there was
12 of 15
So even though its your own proposal that you guys endorsed you don't want to see it as part of the final
3/11/2012 11:00 PM
10 of 15
3/11/2012 11:00 PM
a legal basis for providing it, and then ask them to exercise their authority to provide us with the long form. The
steps required to accomplish that were a letter from the person with the direct and vital interest -- the President -- so
you have a letter from the President, and then there was an accompanying letter from counsel basically formalizing
the request. So the reason we included that is that those were legal steps we took to obtain the long form by way of
this waiver.
Q
Do we have the letter from the President --
MR. BAUER: Its in the packet.

Q
And you went to Hawaii?
MR. BAUER: I did not go to Hawaii. The counsel, Judy Corley, who signed the -- the Presidents personal
counsel at Perkins Coie, Judy Corley, whose letter -- signed letter of request is in your packet, traveled to Honolulu
and picked up the birth certificate.
Q A question on the situation regarding the Defense of Marriage Act. Yesterday Attorney General Eric Holder
rejected attacks on Paul Clement, who is taking up defense of the statute on behalf of the U.S. House. Paul
Clement has taken a lot of heat from the LGBT community for volunteering to take up defense of DOMA. Eric
Holder said, Paul Clement is a great lawyer and has done a lot of really great things for this nation. In taking on the
representation -- representing Congress in connection with DOMA, I think he is doing that which lawyers do when
were at our best. That criticism I think was very misplaced. And Holder went on to compare the criticism of
Clement to attacks on the Justice Department lawyers for their past for detainees at Guantanamo Bay. Does the
President share Eric Holders views on this?
MR. CARNEY: We do share Eric Holders views on this. We think -- as we said from the beginning when we
talked about -- when I did from this podium -- about the decision no longer from the administration to defend the
Defense of Marriage Act, that we would support efforts by Congress if they so chose to defend it. And so I have
nothing to add to the Attorney Generals comments.
Q Following Mondays Af-Pak Situation Room meeting, what is the Presidents assessment of the situation in
Afghanistan and Pakistan? And does he think that July drawdown is still on?
MR. CARNEY: The Presidents policy, which included the beginning of a transition -- beginning of a drawdown
of American troops, is absolutely still on track. I dont have anything additionally from the meeting yesterday beyond
what weve said. But the policy remains as it was.
13 of 15
3/11/2012 11:00 PM
MR. EARNEST: Jay, we should wrap it up here.

MR. CARNEY: Yes. Last one, yes.
Q Given the comments of the Pakistani official quoted in the Wall Street Journal, is Pakistan still a U.S. ally,
and to what extent?
MR. CARNEY: Pakistan is still a U.S. ally.
Thanks.
END
14 of 15
9:18 A.M. EDT
3/11/2012 11:00 PM
Exhibit 2
AFFIDAVIT
STATE OF FLORIDA
1
) ss.
COUNTY OF PALM BEACH
I, Paul Edward Irey, being duly sworn, depose and say underpenalty of
perjury :
I.I am over the age of 18 years old, am a resident of Florida located
at Delray Beach and have been previously accepted by the courts as an
expert witness and have testified as such expert to the information
contained in this affidavit is based on my personal knowledge and,
if called as a witness, I could testify completely thereto.
2. 1 have 57 years experience in graphics. first in serving with the U.S. Air
Force being trained as a clerk typist, two of those years with the
National Security Agency for which I had a Top Secret security
clearance during the years 1957 and 1958.
3. Following that I was employed in Manhattan, New York on the art

staff of the Hearst trade journal American Druggist. I was employed at
various advertising agencies in Manhattan until 1968 when I started
my own business in Ft. Lee, New Jersey named Bergen Graphics.
4. By the mid seventies I employed 60 people as graphic artists, typesetters,
camera and darkroom workers doing pre-press services for major retail
and printing firms in the New York city area such as Montgomery Ward
Catalogs and weekly newspaper ads nationwide, Acme markets
newspaper ads for the entire supermarket chain in the northeast, Hearst
Blue Book Auto Repair manuals, Key Food Stores of New York and Long
Page
Island, Diana stores, Great Eastern Stores, Finest Supermarkets, Hills

Supermarkets, Grand Union Supermarkets, etc.
5. In addition to overall knowledge of typography,Photography, four-color
stripping and all facets of film preparation for offset printing, I have 26
years experience in desktop publishing with Macintosh Computers since
their inception and have used Adobe Photoshop and Adobe Illustrator on a
daily basis since their inceptions in 1987 and 1989.
6. The first Exhibit "A" annexed herewith is a page from a recent issue of
my latest graphic production was published by the the Washington Times
weekly edition that contains much of the evidence that I will explain in this
affidavit.
7. 1 prepared and wrote this full page shown as Exhibit A myself and attest
that the evidence contained therein is accurate and represents evidence of

forgery of what on 27 April at the Press Conference presentation by
White house Consel Bob Bauer, While Press Secretary Jay Carney and
Barack Obama himself allege is Obama's long form birth certificate.
8. The actual document I used for examination of the Obama birth certificate
is described in the following chain of evidence contained in Exhibit "B" ...
page 1 & 2 & 3 anneexed herewith, and
9. That shown as Exhibit "B" page Iand 2 is the proof of purchase of a 14" x
16" reproduction print from Associated Press through their division called
"Replay Photos" that sells photographic items from their news service and
that shown as Exhibit "B" page 3 is a copy of that page purchased as a
true and accurate copy of what the ASSOCIATED Press acquired from the
White House at the news conference on the morning of 27 April 2011.
Page 2
Paragraph 10
Shown below is an enlarged section of the Obama long form birth certificate that was released online at
whitehouse.gov on 27 April 2011. No admission has been made as to who actually scanned and converted this
to an Adobe Acrobat PDF file and posted it on the official White House website. It is not known if it was
someone at the White House or someone at the Honolulu department of health that had previously provided
two copies of Obama's birth certificate that were hand-carried from Hawaii to the White House.
The important feature to observe is that everythmg in black is outlined in white. This will be referred to as
"The White Halon.
The Honolulu dept. of health alleges that the procedure for malung copies of birth certificates is to take the
binder where the birth certificates are stored and open it up to the one they copy, place it face down on an
ordinary copy machine and simply copy the document to green security paper instead of white paper.
Given that this is the normal procedure, I see no reason for the white halo. I have seen many other birth
certificates from Honolulu in the year and a half that I have spend examining this issue of forgery, and can
attest that none of those other birth certificates from Hawaii had a white halo.
f Harpi1.L or inuirurion
(R not ip boqitd
m-
)I
inr
Paraaraph 11
anown below IS what we should have seen if the birth certificate original form was
actualy copied to the green security paper and we would see no white halo. Copiers
do not print white, which is the only way white could be seen anywhere over this
green security paper. I was able to purchase this special paper on the internet. The
green color and hash marks are dye printed through to the other side. In other word:
the paper is green on both sides and there is no white anywhere.
Paragraph 12
To answer the question as to how the white halo happened, I show the example below.
On the left is a copy from the White House release. On the right is my example of a
computer created halo. I have put a white halo on paragraph IIusing the unsharp
mask filter found in Adobe Photoshop. The settings I used iare seen here to the right. As I see it, the forger made the
(cancer)
forgery on a computer, used a scan of the security paper
preview
and included it in the file with the other elements of the
forgery. Then after flattening all the layers, applied the
unsharp mask filter to sharpen up the soft edges of the type.
The forgers serious mistake was to flatten the layers before
applying the sharpening filter. This filter that I have been
using for 22 years chokes back the black edges and leaves
-.
white to create a sharper edge. You see it everywhere even
Radius: 1
2
.
4
1
pixels
around the form type and rules. There is no other way in
graphics science to create the white halo seen on both
documents below, the forgers and mine. Proof of forgery.
Paragraph 15
The first picture at the bottom left is a section of the original PDF file released o n
whitehouse.gov o n 27 April 2012. It represents the color appearance we have been
looking at for 1 112 years. The middle picture at the bottom center is a section of the
document sent to the attorneys for the Mississippi Democratic Party in Taitz et al v.
Democratic Party of Mississippi No. 3:12-cv-00280-HWT-LRA (S.D. Miss.) See
attachment "C", the letter from the registrar of births for the
HUEISATURATION FILTER
state of Hawaii, Alvin Onaka.

It is my understanding and belief that Attorney Tepper
requested a confirmation from the director of the Honolulu
Dept. of Health, Lorretta Fuddy, that the PDF file released
o n whitehouse.org on April 27, 201 1 came from their office
and Loretta Fuddy passed it o n to Alvin Onaka who replied
LEVELS FILTER
to Tepper with letter "C". Tepper passed that o n to Begley.

Begley, who is a MS lawyer, filed it with the court, along with
the altered PDF file that we must assume came from Onaka.
The bottom right picture is my example to show the result of
the specific settings needed to match the alterations seen in
the center photograph. These settings are seen i n the 3 boxes
BLUR TOOL
at the right that resulted in my own match of Onaka's effort

to change the evidence. My conclusion is that the PFD file
000
JHirtoryY~ctiom\
was altered to eliminate the white halo by actions taken at

the Honolulu Dept. of Health so as to hide the error that
proves manipulation by a computer process not available in
1961, and otherwise represents proof of forgery,
if not altered.
SECTION OF ORIGINAL PDF
SAME SECTION OF
ALTERED VERSION
bnh-certificate-lap-form--pdf
r@
r@
r@
r
-
Open
~evels
Hue/Saturat~on
Blur
TOP OF OUR VERSION SHOWING

STEPS TAKEN TO MATCH
page 9
Paul Edward Ireys AFFIDAVIT
Exhibit A
EXHIBIT "A"
ake a eluser Look at the mama ung FDrm BirY CErtiFicatE And ThEn Ask ..."Why Hasn't our congress Taken a Cla5er Lo~IB?"
se~IIoadthe Obwlofi# ram b ' i
The
vdficdte i s dhplaycl below aid d m & la fit &is pagc.

Wcbauc~cmdifprwfsofj%gtqo.Lhiadmmeotpo
Idr and arc showmg 7 area of wreasies~w mdmmd
cvitlm hme. Wc me 2 lypograehrraw ~ l ha cmnbmcd
cxpcricoac 0170
u~anng
mdcxamiaiq w o m
~
m t 9 n g wrrb
c c x p~ w m mming,gmphic arts.
phMo&raphy.mp&~nn,
prinung. and also including
kihe~fwpmcxam.Wcrccn~tllia~c
doFumcnlcxmniocrs should km iiovolvpd in tbia. Our group
ratemplodur emgloy QWW
ofdkc 3,M UCnifi~df
d
d m m u n l tXBmjnm in I h j s mumy. All of hem r c f u d to
bul the evidence shurva US this b k h ccrtiCacnle w m r d
u h lmk at a d i a a h Obamn b i i ~ c a k .
tast ycar M a Macimosb c m n p o ~ ~sen+
~,
tarrcopies 01
-."Ido work rmlbc p-"
M -*I
W V ~
L b P I o n n l o t h e ~ 1 C l - J m 1 ~ . l b f ~ h o r u r c t k n p s l d supp~to h . "M r ~t sa llao we^: we IIQW
s mpy nub@and gave rema c@s 10the mcdia thpl
fomndl~bid~E8bra~y&#forgsry.
2The Bent Cap"Hn
1. Mk-WIatchedTLped tettsrs
e l).pmrileakrtcrscnlargcd hlbeblrth a a l k k . We have markerl
r h e w s ~ m U i a b ~ d o l u o d c r t h e a r i g i e n l k U cOflhclSp8hadmm.oncsais
r.
lrom Ihe wold Wmh& [ h a exhibilp, twn W r e m type styles oClhc W wirhia Ibt s u m
word Thcsc duppon our m m h n that tbc
k k r s w m q k d sad w m b t o d
Campare h
~ f C C S - ~
mEsekrlcrs
EE 66 11
& - & ~
~:zA A I I nnSS
rmotlbe-
rbc upc a f h old maam1typwhsa h g with m q m m

cmted dDatmcnlarimwhile $ladingand wming omawn
w h r l l b u s i i s ' cmplnyiigwer 70 people. MledgedJy
la I'M.a typmriler g
M tbis m a t on a Imm,
Wc havcmlntgd " H U S S m
ktowlopintouthbsrsrwp4'WJ.
It la iw unuEual Iw. tmwritcr leuma to
bc bcol. T k y rn o h u bcnt w h o rhc
typin gets 2 kcys swck rcgtthx and
mpuil
-maw. i r a w m
kncr is bent, il ways b c n and
~ does nm
t y p c b m ~ ~ o r ~ypiagotonlyas~ngk
th
1elvr. Th&bpt@~lergcrgh#
ktUher8q"R"sonIhLs~
%t yy ii
dfww.
~2:~s~
3.Tha CmtHkabNumbw
I l s a m c o n c ~ i l m ~ y c a r m f e r gnbinh
c
ccrtir~ab?form p m . they rvwldmcd u b i i
cemircaen u r h r ihal was issued in the lB61 era
AbabybmIhcsamcdnyinHawaii~8awk
Otwma ...dicd the o a t day. We belim &I
babies nrsaber was 61 1W1. The t ' d y
~UepaodhmbirPlccni~andpmrhcshort
fmmlviIharmmkrc4ldsaqucocc. 'Ibylhol
requcmxl8drhel q fwm ~d wem r8bspd. Tfiey
bmu& a lawseit kfm k Hawailan crwnr,It
wadmiad. wilh lhe WIMexplaining that lhc
Hmlulo Dew. of Heelth could dmide if hey
w w d a p v i d o the binh d c a c o l t k
a blw wrIme.
smjust -of
thommbhhm
r c r u m . h w o u i d ~ ~ c x d y 2 p i u s m ~ tbat~iniath.klwmtbcbtm. T h # ~ s h I d k
rbthlimforliac. ThbwaswmrnmnhaUIam
e q d , Ircrfd@kmnl, ~ l h o c b d m o n w ~ ~
mode f o r i y p r h . Wo wen d
W find anolher
waitan nlwayn mowd a 61
amounl ailor
bitih~kmHarveii~unevenIireqwing
eechtrmrwtypod W o r o J t b t t k r ~ .
a u s @ c i o u s . N o o r k s r M r t k ~ e x h I b U a likctkonc. - L n a l l W s .
a s ; W i dmw hum i#inualy otl a
mxq~utw
wuld wl &ale
tbe~xaa
qdq
TA* ~ F d o P w g s r y .
ther lhc old zayk meehpnical rypcuh*irss
1 ~ vlhitc
e b a ~ ~ . * trm
~ UK ~ n l i whim
e
HOWr d c a ~ ais a a t e outtiae
wonad evenhing w the birlh fert*c&. No otber birlh cenificate bas this. See it on Exblbir "A" below
The !mrd "KapioIaai" &uld b cxaclly

under the word"Mate",
nW s w
W.
TiL8 ispmfoffmpfy. Alao h e
Iaet~haltlorallththmfl~to~lsfiis
m e w .
Whb HHalO
& 6 x h j b i ~ " B " s W i b m v i t a h m r l d h k . Thtsw#cnudbyIbsAdoboPho~sbtlpfilserdta

sharpco*.
I t d e e s ~ s b y c ~ b e d : h c d g c t e s v i n g e w h i l e M oWeshowioExWitT'
.
bwcdidthcsrlmcrhing wour~imeacxamp6aThtHa~Dcp.ofHealrhia~upposedmhaw
pulh~ginalbinhcsniGcaGoonafopiorandpin~ba@~~y~h~dwbits
w.Tbomlyrmult pegsih8ohmtbatisMibir -gl. NOT&bih"A". l h h a l o p m w I1WIbO
f ~ c a m b i n e d a s c a n o d t h t ~ t y p ~ r ...
m flaacaedalld,thccl-iu
rt~
thefikd
then applied t
h Unshllrp M d . I1 i s mw mi h binb
a h v e ... set u p p I
dc m m . S h
& b a d i r r c t ~ d l h c b d n h d ~ f u r a ~ B o m H a w a i i . t h a twhirelrsloweawwha
~~
rhoy q k l . so we must =umc hHnwWian originelha4 i~ a h . I%& I s g r w f 4 f m r g .
~~
-1
Ekunupfmn"
W
m
o birlh oerlili
'
~ a q lEnkib~l
W
l i~
pAm
Hilhaul
h w a bh
--
-;zk
--
3u$i
Exhibit B
EXHIBIT "B"
... page 1
From: prdersO-xrwn
Sent: wedmday, oIAhr05, 2011 9:37AM
To: p u b l a l l m ~
-Replay--shipped
n
m
I I I W I W
I
-I==
AN EXCLUSIVE COLLECTION FROM THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
Your Order liom Replay Photos has been sentl
If your order contained multlpleproducts, notllcatlon about shipment of the other products In
your order may arrive In a separate emall.
If you need to reach Replay
. - Photos with a question about your Order. please emall us at
m a l t o : o r d e m ~ ~ r e d s v ~ ~ h ~ r ~ 2Ifyhu
~ 7prefbrto
8 1 4 speak
9 . to
ET Mondav
someone. dease call us at 877421-2300. Our businesshoursare 8am to 4 ~ m
through ~i-ida~.Ifyou don?reach us, please leave us a messagewith your name and & h o n e
number. We will mpond to email and voice mall prwnptly.
. - In order to expedite your emall or
call, please have your Order reference number handy.
As a reminder. w r Order reference number Is 278149.
Thank you for your business.
The Replay Photos Team
mnm.mds~swl
Replsy~andtheReplayPhobsLogoare~~bademsrlcsofR#hvPhotorCom.
905 W. Mah Stmet, Suite 23C Durham, NC m 0 1 Ph. 8T1.421.2300
From: REPlAYPH(
,M
Sent? -W
,,,x05,2011 938AM
Ta
pavment Receipt: 89067 ConflmaWn hREPMYPHOTOSCOM
EXHIBIT "B" ... page 2

F-
mW-I-06,#1119=38AM
Tot Thomas Rdmm
~ p a v m e r r t ~ p t ~ 7 ~ n M t b n m n ~ ~ O O M
REPLAYPHOTOS COM
Ws Feceipt canfims mment for yaw pdme fFom REPMY PHOTOS UC.IMs orderwill appw
on ywr c d R cad stat88 REPLAYPHOTOS COM. TO
m,P(B988 s a d an
to
or call 91&68&2100.
m p C
T m o n Tima: Oct N,2011 09:38 AM

ID:
51243
~
ph m t k
13421gBal7.41B~
8dae OFder Number:
89087
Tranraetlonm
MaiWhorre Odw
Authorltation
295471
m
s
:
Thomss Putnam
Compenv (Optloid): Motion Systems
1 !J
c!:
US Dollar Total
16 L;
16.00
-. .
~ F I C A T EOF LIVE BIRTH+,
FlLE
NUMBER
Ib.
BARACK
,
Smtt
or Ford#" Couatty)
Xenya, East Africa r
25
,'
Pull
Mmiden Nemt of Mm~htr
;
13.
I
I
"
.,
; 15.
t
STANLEY
Age of Morherll6.
'
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH
151
OBA
61 106Qt
African
12h Umal OEcupalion
"
I=. Lmi Name
Middle Nome
HUSSEIEJ
;10. A p t of Father 11. Birthplerr (lrhnd.
"
Student
lab.
Wnd of Btrdnw or IndrutrJ
University
- -:
14. Rme of Mather
ANN
Blrlhptact (Island, 5mtr
or Mrcign ~oum~r).)(
17s.
APR 2 8 ,2011
-.DUMIBM
Cawxsian
1
Type or Occupalion Ou~aideHome During P r c g m q 1 1 7 ~Dab Cosl Worked
!CERTIFY THIS IS A IXUE COPY OR

ABSTRACT OF W RECORD ON FlLE IM
THE HAWAII STATE DEPARTMENT OF H m f
Exhibit C
Case 3:12-cv-00280-HTW-LRA Document 35-2
Filed 06106112 Page 1 of 1
Wce of Health Status Monitoring

P.O. Box 3370
Depatfntentof Heath
1250 Punchbowl Street
Honolulu, Hawaii 96813
Honolulu, Hawaii 96801
STATE OF HAWAII
VERIFICATION OF BIRTH
Exhibit D
Re: binder 11 ... - Yahoo! Mail
1 of 3
http://us.mc1257.mail.yahoo.com/mc/showMessage?sMid=12&filterBy=&...
Tuesday, December 4, 2012 11:26 AM
Re: binder 11 ...

From: "Henry Wayland Blake" <hwblake@bellsouth.net>
To: "Paul Irey" <pauledwardirey@gmail.com>, "Doug Vogt" <Diehold@comcast.net>,
orly.taitz@gmail.com, cestrunck@yahoo.com, "Chito Papa" <rajska7@gmail.com>
3 Files (1688KB)
1051324
1051324
1051324
DearPaul,
Ithinkyouhaveproposedthemostprobablescenariobasedonthecrea onandfiledatesofthe
associatedcourtdocuments.
1.ThepapercopyoftheTeppertoFuddy3pagele erwasdated05/26/2012.
2.Theelectronicversionofthis3pagele erappearedonScribdon06/06/2012
3.TheTepperfourpageelectronicdocument10513240131.pdf(sameas351.pdf)wascreatedon
06/04/2012andwaslastmodifiedon06/06/2012.Pages13ofthisdocumentarethe3electronic
pagesoftheTeppertoFuddyle erthatappearedonScribdon06/06/2012.The4thelectronicpageis
theTepperpage4,LFCOLB.ThisfourpagedocumentwasfiledinMSon06/06/2012.
4.WereallydontknowwhentheTepperpage4LFCOLBwascreated.
5.ThepapercopyoftheonepageOnakatoTepperverifica onle erwasdated05/31/2012.
6.Theelectronicversion,whichiscourtdocument352,wascreatedon06/04/2012andwaslast
modifiedon06/06/2012.ThisonepageelectronicdocumentwasfiledinMSon06/06/2012.
IbelievethatthemostlikelyscenarioisthatTeppercreatedapapercopyofhisthreepagele erto
Fuddyon05/26/2012.Hea achedapaperprintoutcopyoftheoriginalWHLFCOLBandmailedthis
fourpagepapercopytoFuddy.
TepperandOnakathencollaboratedtoaltertheWHLFCOLBtocreatetheTepperpage4LFCOLB.
On06/04/2012,Teppercreatedthedocuments10513240131.pdf(sameas351)and352.
Hethenfiledthetwodocuments351and352inMSon06/06/2012.
Wereallydontknowtheindividualac onsofeitherTepperorOnakawithregardsthemodifica onsof

theWHLFCOLBPDFimagefiletocreatethealteredLFCOLBPDFimagefile.Onakamayhavemodified
theWHLFCOLBandthensentthealteredPDFimagetoTepperasaonepagePDFimagefile.Thereis
12/4/2012 3:13 PM
Re: binder 11 ... - Yahoo! Mail
2 of 3
http://us.mc1257.mail.yahoo.com/mc/showMessage?sMid=12&filterBy=&...
nothinginhisverifica onle erthatindicatesthathea achedthisalteredLFCOLBtohisverifica on

le er.However,hisle erdoesrefertotheLFCOLBcopythatwaspurportedlya achedtothefourpage
requestle erfromTeppertoFuddy.
Alterna vely,TeppermighthavehadsomeoneelsemodifytheWHLFCOLBPDFimagetocreatethe
alteredPDFimage.ThatmightexplainwhytheMETADATAwasnoten relyerasedfromhisfourpage
electronicdocument.WeknowthatascannerwasusedsoTeppersforgerwouldhavehadtohave
somemeansofresizingascannedandalteredimageoftheWHLFCOLBbacktothecorrectsizeto
matchareal1961Cer ficateofLiveBirthprintedform.
Iamnowcertainthatthe21addedobjectswhichareinvisibleinAdobeReaderpreexistedbefore
06/04/2012asaseparatePDFimage.The21objectsinclude12linesegements,2broadlinestrikeouts
and7Blackredac onrectangles.Thisredac onpageissmallerthantheLFCOLBimagepagesize.I
havesuccessfullyseparatedthissmallerredac onimagefromthefla enedandalteredWHLFCOLB
imageinbothAdobeIllustratorCS6andInkscape.Ihavea achedmylatestscreenshotsfromAdobe
Illustratorasproof.Thescreenshot[105132401131_ss3.jpg]a achedshowstheredac onpageslid
otheLFCOLBimagepagetotheright.Thebackgroundoftheredac onpageistransparent.
Soanalterna vescenariowouldbethatTepperhadhisforgermodifytheWHLFCOLBandOnaka
providedtheredac onimagetoassistTeppersforgerresizehisscannedimage.Thiswouldlessen
Onakasinvolvementwiththecrea onofthefraudulentLFCOLBTepperpage4LFCOLB.
SoscenarioAwouldbethatOnakadidthedeedandscenarioBwouldbethattheycollaboratedtodo
thedeed.
Eitherwaytheybothareguiltyofa emp ngtopulloabaitandswitchonJudgeWingate.They

subs tutedtheTepperpage4LFCOLBfortheWHLFCOLBanddidnttellJudgeWingateaboutthe
switch.
Icanprovideanotarizedcopyofmyswornadavitwheneveryouneedit.Also,Icanprovideanyofmy
screenshotsasrequired.Iwouldprefernottotes fybecauseofpersonalreasons.Ialsobelievethat.if
Iweretotes fy,thenIwouldquicklybecomeapunchingbagforthedefensebecauseIdonthavean
ITcer ficateandIhavenevertes fiedasaforensicexpert.
Sincerely,
Henry
From:PaulIrey
Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2012 5:54 AM
To: doug@vectorpub.com ; orly.taitz@gmail.com ; cestrunck@yahoo.com ; hwblake@bellsouth.net
Subject: binder 11 ...
__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 7763 (20121204)
__________
12/4/2012 3:13 PM
Exhibit 3
Strunk v Jeffries et al. Article 78 NYSSC for Kings County Index No.; 2 1948 1 20 12
AFFTJIAVTT OF SERVICE
STATE OF NEW YO=
COUNTYOFULSTER
)
) ss.
)
Accordingly, I, H.William Van Allen. being duly sworn, depose and say under penally of perjury:
a.
b.
c.
Am over 18 years of age and not a party to this action.

My place of business is located at 351 North Road Ilusley New York 12243.
On November 14, 2012, Christopher Strunic instructed me to serve a true conformed copy of the NOTICE OF
PETITION, PETITION with AFFIDAVIT OF VERIFICATION affirmed November 13,2012 along with a
NOTICE OF INTENT TO FJLE AN OHIIEH TO SHOW CAUSE APPLICATION FOR A PRELIMTNARY

INSUNCTION PENDING A DECLARATORY INJUNCTION ON ISSUE OF LAW AS TO ELECTORS
DECLARATORY RELIEF AS TO ELECTORS, a Notice of Petitioner's intent to file an order to show cause
application at the Kings County Supreme Court Building at 10 19M on the 10th Floor intake at 360 Adams Street on
Monday November 19, 2012 placing a complete set in a properly addressed to each respondent listed below for
delivery by USPS by certified mail with request for return receipt for proof of service.
d. On November 14, 2012,1 caused tach copy with proper postage for service by certified mad on the listed Electors and
where each envelope was properly addressed with the Notification "URGENT LEGAL SERVICE" and " PERSONAL &
CONFIDENTIAL" in the lower left hand corner of the envelop that was then deposited with the USPS for service upon:
--
1.
2.
Hakeem Jeffi-ies 35 Underhill Avenuc. #2A Brooklyn, NY I 1238

Grace Meng of 14714 34th Avenue -- Flushing. NY 11354
3. Felix Ortia 189 B 33rd Street -- Brooklyn. NY 1 1232
4. Bill DeBlssio of 442 I lth Sh'eet -- BrooklynNY 1 1215
5 . Walter Cooper 150 West 96th Strea, #I2G New York. NY 10025
6. Keith L.T. Wright of2225 Fifth Avenue --New York, N Y 10037
7. Christine C . Quiun of 263 Ninth Avenue, #3A -- New York NY 10001
8. William Thompson of 106 West 121st Street --New York, W 10027
9. Scott Stringer of 155 West 71st Street, #3.4 --New York, NY 10023
10. Emily Ciske of 440 West 24th Street New York NY 10014
1I . Anne Marie Anzalone 2827 48th Street Astoria NY 1 1 103
12. Archie Spigncr o f 1 1210 173h Street -- Jamaica, NY 1 1433
13. George Grcsllam 1313 East 233rd Street -- Bronx: NY 10466
14. Ruben Diaz, Jr. of X20 Royton Avenue, #GI3 -- Rmnx. NY 10473
16. Mario Cilento 3 lsabel Road -- Orangeburg, NY 10962
17. Gerald D. Jennings of 1135 New Swtland Road -- Albany. NY 12208
18. Byron Brown 14 Blaine Street -- BuKaIo, NY 14208
19. Robert naffy 164 Croydon Road -- Rochester, NY 14610
20. Joseph Marelle o f 133 Deerfield Drive Kocl~ester,NY 14609
21. Scott Gdams o f I I Poplar Avenue Orchard Park, NY 14127
22. Stephanie lMiner 102 Woodside Drive -- Syracuse, N Y 13224
23. Steve Rellone 107 Vanderbilt Avenue -- West Babylon, NY 1 1704
24. Irene Stein 101 Brandywine Driw -- Ithaca. NY 14850
25. Shcita Cornar 29 Depot Street Middle Granville, N Y 12849:
26. Kirsten Gillibmnd with DC Office 478 Russel1 Washingon, DC 2051 0
--
--
--
--
--
CM / RR No 70 1210 1 000068749741
CM/ RRNo 7012101000068749818
CM I Rli No JO 1 2 1 0 1000068749758
CM/RRNo7012101000068749765
CM I RR No 701 2101 000068749956
CM I RR No 7012 10lfl00068749826
CMtRRNo 7012101000068749833
CM / RR No 70 1 2 1 01 000068749840
CM/RRNo7012101000068749857
CM / RR No 7012101000068749864
CM / RRNo 701 21 01000068749901
CM / RR No 70 1 2 I 0 1 000068750242
CM / RR No 701 2 10 1 000068749963
CM I RR No 7012101000068749796
CM / RR No 70 1210 1000068749949
CM J RR No 701 21 01000068749895
CM / RR No 70 12I0 1000068749970
CM / RR No 70 12101000068749802
CM/RRNo 7012101000068749772
CM 1 RR No 701 21 01 000068749789
CM I RR No 7012 101000068749871
CM/~No7012101000068749888
CM/RRNo7012101000068749918
CM / RR No 701 2 1 0 1 000068749925
CM J RKNo 701210t000068749932
CM I RR No 70
000068749987
fl
Sworn to before me
day ofNovember 2012
This
JUDITH S. MAWON
NOfARY PUBLIC, STATE OF NEW YMIK
NO 01MA6095585
QUALIFIED IN ULSTER C O U m
COMMISSION EXPIRES JULY 14.20-
/g

Christopher E a r l
IN-
Shunk in e s s e
'/!
II
STA7F.OFNRH'YORK
UJUNTYOFULS7TR
11
-v,
I. Hlkeem hmer 35 Underhill Avmuc, #2A -- BmoWyn, NY 11238

2. Bill DeBlasio of442 11th Stnet-Bmok3yn.W 11215
3. F E ~ Xomz 189 B 33rd street ~ m o u y nNY
. 11732
)
83%
Petitioner
r c d i n g l ? . I, 14. \Villirlm V a n Allch kin!: dul! sanm d e w a n d w? under p a l l ? ofpmjum:

plecr ufbuanlwalnl at '351 S w h K u u l Hurlcv N w Yark 11243
a trur rnnramd my. n r U 1 IIONCE
~
OF
m o m . -on
rlth ATPIDAW OF v e r u n c A n o n allirmcd hrnmbri I J. 21112.l~l~nu
V T , ~
a
NO.I.I[ I: ( iI Y
~T F ~ TO
~ . ~FII F A S OHIIIH T ~r lIl o \ \ c , A ~ S ,\ISrLtcA.t
I:
ION FOR A PREI.I\IIYARY
IYJI'YCTIIIS Pl'>IIIN(; .\ 1>I'C'L:\H\TOHY 1\.11 \ C r 1 0 \ O X 1551 E OF LAW A\ T O ILI'CTORS
1)Fr'I.ARATIIRY HELICF hr TI1 F L F c l ' i I K r .,xllr , r . , rtlv.~nrr',~n,m,rufiir unnrnrr:.,.~,~.~l . l ~ # * r
b. \Ir
r.
5. Gerald D. lmninga of 1135 Nev ScotlandR d - Albany,NY 12208

6. GcorgeOresharn I313 Emf 233rd $met-- B m w N Y 104M
7. Rukn Dw. lr. of 820 BoronAAAAAA,
116D -- Bmm,NY I W73
8. Bymn Bmwn I 4 Blaine S t e t
Strunk v .kTTrbc*@tUI A n i c l r 7R NYSSC Br Kings Cntmly Indtx No.: ? I M R / 2 0 1 2
-- Buffnlo, NY 14208
On X m m k r 14.111I.'. Chnhlnphm RrunC m - r r u ~ r da r to -7
9. R o w Durn 164 Cmydon Road - Rochesta; NY 14610
10. Josmh Mmelle of 133 Dedeld Lhive -- Roch-.NY .
146W
~
13. WalterCoo~er150 West 96th S u e 4 1 2 G New York. NY 10025

I
_
IS. Keith L.T. Wnght of2225 Finh Aucnuc -NcwYohNY 10037
16. Christine C. Oulnn of 263 Nmfh Averme. U3A --New Yak. NY lWOl
20.
21.
22.
23
24
Scorn Adams of 11 Poplar A v m e -- Onhard Park,NY 14127

Stephanie Miner 102 Wmdside Drive Syracuse, NY 13224
Marto Cilcnlo 3 Isabel Road - Orangeburg, NY I0962
Anne Mane A n d o n e 2827 48th Stmet Aslaria, NY 11103
OraoeMtnl of 14714 34th A v m e -- Flurhinc.NY 11354
--
28. Shcmla Cornar29 D&I Strsel- Middle Oranville. NY 12849

29. Ken knkms 108 Bushsy Avenue Yonkers NY 10710
3,,.
Iclnw
G t ~ L m m u n& o m Respondents
@ m L
w W ~ N G T D UD L
VOTICE OF INTENT TO FILE AN ARTICLE 78 PETITION WITH Ah' ORDER TO SHOW

CAUSE APPLICATION FOR A PRELlnllYARY IHJUYCTION PEYDIXG A
Please take nothe of Petitioner's i n t e n t t o file an o r d e r t o show cause a~dicationat t h e Kings
County S u p r e m e C o u r t Building at 11 AM o n the lo* Floor in&
a t 360~d-s Street o n Monday
November 19,2012 for a preliminary i n j u n c t i o n relief p e n d i n g a declaratory j u d g m e n t on i s s u e s of
law. e & A n p u b l ~ comern to b e held lnnble nr nccerroner tc felonten m uourpat!on of Omcr of
P07Us and Ballot access? Are publlc omcers prrsrntrd w t h t h e facts of Barack Obama m e h g r b h r y
a b l e t o change q u a l ~ d c a n o n brforr
s
thr U l r c t o r d College Vote s c h e d u l e d December 15. 2 0 1 L?
FOR
~ F S F
~ W W *,ED.
.
For further i n f o m a t i o n C o n t a c t :
Christopher-Earl: Strunk in csse
~ 3 ~3 v m~ ~ l~t * ~x n 7u- 2 8~1

Brooklyn N e w York 1 1 2 3 8
:.
Cellphone: 845-901-6767
Email: chris@s~&.ws
f- - -
u.,,...
e.5
--
"
L - - '
-. >
~
-*-,,..
Hakeem leffnes
35 Uderhill Avenue,
0 @a>n"lr
r- ,?, ..*
,.xr--
BWOklyn, N Y 11238
......
.,,,, ,New York, NY IW23
:E.
2225 Fifth Avenue -
,nw~lv.
Ti
t-
N.
NmvYork.liY I M 3 7
.......
.............
.............
....
Ruben Die Jr.
...........
..
2-
A,
===.
"""zfl
Jmph Morelle
.133 M ~ e l d ~ ~ = Rochester, NY 14609
--.-J$
%.a Ttii~nolz
.....
.
Rochester, NY 14610
-.--.--.--.-
w.ww-
. , 6..
--
Steve Bellone
1W Vanderbllt Avenue
West Babylon, NY 11 704
.........
Strunk v Jeffries et al. Article 78 W S S C for Kings kounty Index No.; 21 948 / 2012
STATE OF NEW.YORK
COUNTY OF KINGS
Accordingly, I,
)
) ss.
)
Rou&e e@
~ALC
,being duly sworn, depose and say under penalty of pejury:
a. Am over 1 8 years of age a n d not a party t o t h i s action.

b. My place of business is located at
c.
6J5 k?Mc1 1 2
O n November 3 0 , 2 0 1 2 , Christopher S t r u n k instructed m e t o serve a true conformed copy of t h e PETITIONER'S

SECOND AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT OF OSC with EXHIBITS annexed AFFIRMED November 30,2012 along with a copy
of t h e NOTICE OF PETITION, PETITION with AFFIDAVIT OF VERIFICATION affirmed November 1 3 , 2 0 1 2
placing a complete s e t i n a properly addressed envelope to e a c h respondent listed below for delivery by USPS regular
mail.
d. O n November 3 0 , 2 0 1 2 , I caused e a c h copy with proper postage for service by first class mail o n t h e listed Electors And
where e a c h envelope w a s properly addressed with t h e Notification "URGENT LEGAL SERVICE" a n d 'PERSONAL &
CONFIDENTJAL" i n t h e lower left h a n d c o m e r of the envelop t h a t w a s then deposited with the USPS for service upon:
7. Hakeern Jeffi-ies 35 Underhill Avenue, #2A -- Brooklyn, N Y 11238
8. Bill DeBlasio of 442 1lth Street -- Brooklyn, NY 11215
11. Tom DiNapoli 100 Great Neck Road -- Great Neck, NY 11201
14. Sheldon Silver of 550 Grand Street, #5A -- New York,,NY 10002
17. William Thompson of 106 West 121st Street --New York, NY 10027
18. Scott Stringer of 155 West 71st Street, #3A --New York, NY 10023
20. Scott Adams of 11 Poplar Avenue -- Orchard Park, NY 14127 21. Stephanie Miner 102 Woodside Drive -- Syracuse, NY 13224
23. Anne Marie Anzalone 2827 48th Street -- Astoria, NY 11103
24. Grace Meng of 14714 34th Avenue -- Flushing, NY 11354
28. Sheila Comar 29 Depot Street -- Middle Granville, NY 12849
30. Joshua Pepper NYSAssiatant Attorney General Office of Attorney General 120 Broadway NY NY 10171
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
31
KLQ>T
t t ~b t ~ r c / @ ~ 'JfaBW
Notary PJe]i'c
*.
'
KAMAL P. SON\
Notary Public, State of New York
No. 01SO6089949
Qualified in Kings C0unly
Commission Expires March 31.2015
$Ff=lC@rcCyb
K
~ ~ S ~ L~ ~WWTHI G
Exhibit 4
FOR JUDICIAL INTERVENTION"
-QUEST
For court Clerk use Only:
UCS-840 (312011)
Supreme
IAS tntry Uate
COURT, COUNTY OF
Kings
&v-
Index NO:
2 1 5 9 Z"(&
WEnter the complete case caption. Do notastxet a l w et am.
Date Index Issued:
I?
20/2
If mae space is
reauired,attach a caption rider sheet.
KJI Uate
I<glm ~ b ~ ~ ~ n C
' G
H ~c ~* T ~~ ,N E
W l U J A M t & d m ~ o ~
Stun
~ , J7R,NGefll
c m ( c y GlS((F, f i N P F W A N E ~ ~ & f d l u t ? ,. . B - & c , ~SIR~G r J G Rr GWS
ewgew
Ru@)FJpf.&Z
) ? r ~
<(&-Waf
h ~ ~& 6 ~ &
a N I ~ J .w/za~
,
~mt@> 7
1 2 6 5 W W p ~ yJ, 03-a
Se ~ m . f i ~ ~h
~.f
~ia
p ~J
eeFW
) ncr;
4
I . J W ? ~6 7 - UF~
~ C F~
CL~
c a w , FWL)
~ ( I R s - ~ F w G ~ L L ~ R ~ , ~ ~o~
~ l ~ e a ; b m I e n t ( s )
.
:,-*.
*..-*--*
.
NATUREOF' ACTION ~-&O%UING?
" - 'zChe&.O~Eboro"ly
and,specify~he~i;;~f&e&. .
Z - - ..
y'= _ _ _- m .C,G
J@-
-a
<
COMMERCIAL
0 Contested
0 Uncontested
-P
zk4
d
0 Bus~nessEntlty (~nclud~ng
corporations, partnersh~ps,L ~ S et
.
0 Contract
E r----
NOTE: For all Matrimonial actions where tha p a r t i i have children under
the age of 18, complete and attach the MATRIMONIAL RJI Addendum.
TORTS
0 Asbestos
0Insurance (where insureris a party, except arbitration)=C

0 UCC (including sales, negotiable instruments)
0 Other Commercial:
23
7
-,
(rpecitv)
I 0 Breast Implant
0 Environmental:
I,
NOTE: For Cornmerclal Dhrision assignment requests 122 NYCRR 5
202.70(d)]. complete and attach the COMMERCIAL D N RJI Addendum.

REAL PROPERTY: How many properties does the applicationindude?
(apeufy)
1 0 Condemnation
Medical, Dental, or Pediatric Malpractice

0 Motor V&de
products ~iability.
0
001hw N e g l i i c e :
0Other Professional Malpractice:
0Other ToR.
'
MATRIMONIAL
0 Foreclosure
property Address:
CW
Street Address
(spa~lfy)
(specify)
complete and attach the FORECLOSURE RJI Addendum.

Block:
Lot:
0Tax Certiorari - Section:

0Other Real Property:
(seecif~)
(SpeclfY)
(~pcclty)
OTHER MATTERS
Certmcate of lncorporationlDissolution [see NOTE under Commercial]
0Emergency Medical Treatment
SPECIAL PROCEEDINGS
CPLR Art~cle75 (Arbltratm) [see NOTE under Commercial]
, CPLR Art~cle78 (Body or Officer)
9Election Law
0 Habeas Corpus
0 Local Court Appeal
0MHL Arbcle 9.60 (Kendra's Law)

0 MHL Article 10 (Sex Offender ConRnement-Initial)
0Mechanic's Lien
0 Name Change
0 MHL Article 10 (Sex OffenderConfinement-Rewew)

0 MHL Article 81 (Guardianship)
0 Other Mental Hygiene:
0Plstol Permit RevocationHearing
0 Sale or Financeof Religious/Not-for-Profit Property
0-
bpeclfy)
0Other Special y ~ e d i n g :
ISTAWS UF ACTION O R ~ P R O C ~ E ~ I.N ~ :

L
-,.,
~Specitv)
. A n s h YES or NO for EVERY &tiohUb

YES I NO
Has a summom and complaint or suhrnons wlnotice been filed?
8)
lIfyes.datefiled:
,
Is this adionlproceeding being filed post-judgment?
State
zip
NOTE: For Foreclosure actions involving a one- to four-family, owneroccupied, residential property, or an owner-occupied condominium. '
en& & i t i d
If yes, judgment date:
IY
&nation
;vhere
IAL INTERVENTION:
w ONE bax ofilpAND ede~dUiimI~jnfom&h

where indicated.
dlor Certificate of Readiness
0 Nobe of hkdical. Dental. or Pediatric Malpractice

Relief Sought:
0 Nobce bf Mobon
0 N~ofPetiaon
Relief Sought:
Relief Sought:
'
$@order
ID
Show Cause
0 Other Ex Parte Application
mo.~
Return Date:
Return Date:
Return Date:
' / P J5u P a H pA@
Relief Sought:
0 poor ~ersoraApplicat~on
0 Request for Preliminary Conference
Date lssue Joined:
H e 9 p % a 1%
0 Resdential Mortgage ForeclosureSettlement Conference
0 Wnt d Habeas Corpus
(w=JfY):
imvcASES:
,-.,
..-
List any relatedactii: FOFnilmmal acims, k;clude~&pm3la~~drninal

andhx Family Court cases. - , = =- , ,,
,
.-.
. :--.
s . .S k C .,-If-additmal spsce isnquired, complete and attach the R31 Addendum. xlfmorre;4eave blank.
.-.
~
;
IndexlCase No.
Case Tile
S%~qckr.
2SCIqI-
&@
e- z(rjB
9
by
.%&\I P w fa-n,"lt3a+ 2
v
'PAimES: ,
*PI<
4 t CJQ-rn
~ ~ - n a0, 4
~
A cnvF ZMS RPCT(WQ
S ~ ~ L Q ~ IJDGCLV
r -S
+ - eC8
KtflJ-S'f
LC
IL
Y C H ~ ~ C-7 ~SC
C CG am @3f*
ilf additionalspace'ismqulred~~~mpld~
andattacti t h e . R J l ~ ~ w d ~ -;.'
~,*~;, 2 ; r - . i:-.
*.- " .,
rys& Y
zmr
&+Q
11
"
&L1
12-sx'
,o*
*a 4
'*'p
"
*<&$s..
For partieswthout an-attom6y, check"UkRep box AN0 entmpaTty adrlrd, phone"ntmbefand~a~l~&dres&&

* ~ ~ g . g p a,.z:v ~ : ,
!Attorneys:
Parties:
Un- . ~ cpart~es
t
in caption order and
party
1 Rep lndlcate
(e'g. defendant:
3rd-party pla~ntiff).
%-J<
, 5 T g w J f Kb s t Name
Lsst Name
C/$&srdb'rf13c-wQ='C
Flnt Name
CpfAIs .iapt4~7~7
@lX
First N a m
Primary Role:
I
37-a-sV
Cltv
F i i Name
~
emall
LII~
hma
Pnmy Rob:
St#e
Cw
Stmt A d d m
F a
Phom
Mnmm
3No
last-
Fhtllrnrt
YES
~mllrrr
FbstNama
Rimy R O k
om,
cg
arbst Addrrrt
Ro* P v ) :
3YEs
R m Name
M p s r-
-=--v-(n.nyl:
=-Y
InsuranceCarrisr(s):
3YEs
NxkL
B & -Phone
- Q o L - ~7' ~ ~Fax
becbndslrRd.(ff=w:
h?&K==J
Issue
Joined
(YIN):
Provide name, firm name, business address, phone number and e-mail
address of all attorneys that have appeared in the case.
Pkav
Fax
Fn'
Lsst Hame
Lasf N a m
FkmwIII.
Fk.1 N a m
M m a y Rok:
crr
she! M d r s s r
&
)(O
Second.yRob (If any):
Phom
Fax
I AFFIRM UNDER THE PENALTY OF PERJURY THAT, TO MY KNOWLEDGE, OTHER THAN AS MOTED #BWl&THERE ARE AW
HAVE BEEN NO RELATED ACTIONS OR PROCEEDINGS, NOR
FILED IN THIS ACTION OR PROCEEDING.
Dated:
FF
~
ATTORNEY REGISTRATION NUMBER
**
SIGNATURE
c-
PRINT OR TYPE NAME
Exhibit 5

COUNTY OF KINGS:
........................................................................
CHRISTOPHER-EARL
STRUNK
PETITIONER
SPECIAL
ELECTION
PART
Index No. 21948/12

Hon. David I. Schmidt
November 19,2012
HAKEEM
JEFFRIESET AL.,
RESPONDENTS
Upon the foregoing papers, petitioner purchased an index number with the County
Clerk and submits an order to show cause with the court for signature. Although it is
difficult to discern the exact nature of the relief sought by petitioner, the main thrust of his
papers seems to challenge the validity of the November 6,20 12 election of Kirsten Gillibrand
to the office of United States Senator from the State of New York. Specifically, the petition
states that "Petitioner wishes the Court to void the U.S. Senate Election and ask the Governor
set a special election, because a significant number of the electors casting their respective
vote were domiciled in New York for less than five years." At a minimum, both the
Governor and the Board of Elections in the State of New York are necessary parties in any
proceeding seeking such relief. However, neither has been named here. In this regard, the
court notes that in an order dated April 11, 2012, Hon. Arthur Schack of this court
specifically enjoined petitioner "from commencing future litigation in the New York State
Unified Court System against the New York State Board of Elections [and] Andrew Cuomo
(among others)
. . . without prior approval of the appropriate Administrative Justice or
Judge."
Under the circumstances, the court declines to sign the instant order to show cause.
Prior to presenting any hrther orders to show cause to the court, petitioner must name all
necessary parties and obtain the proper authorization as set forth in Justice Schack's order.
This constitutes the decision and order of the court.
ENTER,

-----------------------------------------------------------------------x
Index No.: 21948 / 2012


Petitioner,

Respondents.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------x

Exhibit 6
AFFIDAVIT: WHITE HOUSE BIRTH CERTIFICATE IS A

FORGERY
Published: 4 days ago
image: http://www.wnd.com/files/2012/08/cmonckton_avatar.jpg
LORD MONCKTON About | Email | Archive
Affidavit
I, the undersigned Christopher Walter Monckton, commonly known as the Viscount Monckton of
Brenchley, Peer of the Realm, of 27 Queen Street, Edinburgh, EH2 1JX, being first duly sworn, do
hereby state under oath and under penalty of perjury that the facts are true:
1) I am over the age of 18 and am a resident of the United Kingdom. The information herein is
based upon my own personal knowledge. If called as a witness, I could testify competently thereto.
I have a degree in classical architecture from Cambridge University. The course included
instruction in mathematics. I am the director of Monckton Enterprises Ltd., a consultancy
corporation which, inter alia, has investigated scientific frauds at government level, one of the
matters on which I advised Margaret Thatcher from 1982-1986 at 10 Downing Street during her
time as prime minister. I have published several papers in the reviewed literature on climate
science and economics and was an expert reviewer for the Fifth Assessment Report(2013) of the
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. I was that years Nerenberg Lecturer in Mathematics
at the University of Western Ontario, Canada. I hold the Meese-Noble Award for Freedom and the
Intelligence Medal of the Army of Colombia for my research on climate change.
2) I have experience in the use of certain mathematical techniques which allow rigorous and
impartial assessment of probabilities including the probability that a deliberate deception has been
perpetrated. For instance, while working for Margaret Thatcher, I was approached by an inventor
who said a government department had stolen his invention. The department responded to my
inquiries with lengthy answers which contained six scientific errors each of which might conceivably
have arisen by inadvertence. The errors came from different sources and were unrelated to one
another. Each was elementary. I concluded that the probability that the errors had been inadvertent
was small, and that the department had indeed stolen the invention. The inventor went to court and
was awarded more than $1 million. In 2007, I was asked to provide scientific testimony on whether
Al Gores climate movie, An Inconvenient Truth,contained accidental or deliberate errors. I
identified 36 errors, each of which either stated that there was a problem where none existed or
that a problem that might exist was worse than it was. The judge accepted that the probability that
all of the errors would have fallen by accident in one direction only was very small. The plaintiff, a
lorry-driver who had not wanted his two schoolchildren to be subjected to political propaganda at
school, was awarded $400,000 costs. The judge said, The Armageddon scenario that he [Gore]
depicts is not based on any scientific view, and said he would have banned the film from all
schools in England and Wales had the Department of Education not offered to circulate 77 pages
of corrective guidance to all schools.
3) I am asked to give expert testimony on the probability, taking into account the results of a lawenforcement investigation by the Cold Case Posse acting for the Sheriff of Maricopa County,
Arizona, that the document purporting to be a digital photographic image of an original paper longform Hawaiian birth certificate for President Obama that was personally endorsed by him at a press
conference on April 27, 2011, and was thereupon posted on the White House website, is an image
of a genuine original document. I rely on the findings published by investigators acting at the
instance of the Sheriff of Maricopa County, Arizona, in two press conferences, given on 1 March
and 17 July 2012 respectively, and on information subsequently provided to me by the
investigators. At the second press conference, the sheriff said he was now certain that the White
House document was a forgery. Based on the findings of the law-enforcement investigation, I have
conducted a probability analysis to establish the likelihood that the White House document is
genuine.
4) Where a document contains what appear to be irregularities, they may have arisen by
inadvertence or by design. Probability theory assists in evaluating the likelihood that all of the
irregularities were indeed inadvertent.
5) The method is based on one of the earliest and simplest principles in the theory of probability,
which arose from the mathematical study of the odds at games of chance. A simple heuristic will
illustrate the method. Suppose that two dice are rigged so that they will always show a pair of
identical numbers when thrown. Then the odds that a double-six, for instance, will occur are 1 in 6.
On the other hand, if the dice are not rigged in any way, so that they land randomly, the chance of
a double six occurring is just 1 in 36, for the face that lands uppermost on one dice is entirely
independent of the face that lands uppermost on the other, and the probability that the first die will
display a six is 1 in 6, and each time that occurs there is only a 1 in 6 chance that the other die will
also display a six.
6) In general, therefore, the probability that a series of independent events will occur is simply the
product of the individual probabilities that each of the independent events in the series will occur.
Thus, with two dice each independently possessing a 1 in 6 probability that a six will show, the
probability of a double six is 1 in 6 times 1 in 6: i.e., 1 in 36. With three such dice, the probability of
a triple six is 1 in 6 times 1 in 6 times 1 in 6, or 1 in 216; and so on. The probabilities rapidly
diminish with each additional independent event.
7) The same technique may be applied to assessing the probability that a suspect document is
genuine. The technique is particularly suitable for the testing of those documents in which the
irregularities are so varied that unless they arose by design as in the fabrication of a forgery
they arose naturally or by inadvertence and are very likely to be truly independent of one another,
so that their individual probabilities fall to be multiplied together to determine the probability that,
overall, the irregularities occurred in a single document by inadvertence rather than by design.
8) The value of taking an explicitly mathematical approach to weighing evidence suggestive of
forgery particularly where the context is inescapably political is that the test is, as far as
possible, objective. Once it is accepted that certain irregularities exist and that the individual
probability of each irregularity occurring by mere inadvertence is as stated, then the overall
probability that deception is absent becomes a matter of arithmetic. If any individual probability is
thought unsuitable, a preferred value may be substituted and the calculation redone. The method
and the results are explicit, transparent, and independent of any expertise or prejudice on the part
of the mathematician. They may be independently reviewed by any other mathematician.
9) The first step in the probabilistic analysis of a document, then, is to list the individual
irregularities found therein and to assign a reasonable and legitimate individual probability to each
irregularity. I have had detailed discussions with the sheriffs investigators and with some experts
so as to form a view on the probabilities that each of the errors that have been identified are
inadvertent.
10) The investigators have said during their press conferences that one of their most serious
concerns is that the White House document appears to have been fabricated piecemeal on a
computer, inferentially by drawing together digitized data from several genuine birth certificates.
Not the least of the reasons why the investigators have reached this conclusion is that the
distribution of the electronic data between nine distinct layers exhibits characteristics untypical of
a paper document that has been scanned to create a simple, digitized photographic image that
may (0r may not) also have been processed either to sharpen the image using optical characterrecognition software or to compress the file-size by using file-compression or optimization software.
11) The investigators told me that the electronic data file of the White House document, when
opened in Adobe Illustrator, can be separated into nine separate data layers and one clippingmask path that groups the layers. Forensic experts for the Cold Case Posse established that
these layers were not an artifact either of optimization or of optical character recognition. In any
event, statements from the governor of Hawaii and from the White House Press Office establish a
chain of custody whereby no mention was made of any alteration or processing of the photocopied
images at any point.
12) I am told the electronic image was posted at the White House website in the form of a portable
document format (.pdf) file at 12.09 p.m. on 27 April 2011 using a program called Macintosh
Preview, which is recorded among the properties of the data file as the application that created it.
However, I am told that forensic experts have deduced that a different software suite, Adobe
Photoshop, was used to fabricate or alter the electronic image; then yet another program, Adobe
Illustrator, was used to compile the various layers and export them as a .pdf; then, immediately
before posting on the Internet, Macintosh Preview was used in an unsuccessful attempt to erase
the digital traces of the previous use of Adobe Photoshop and Adobe Illustrator, and to reduce the
file size.
13) A key reason for this deduction by the investigators is that Macintosh Preview will not generate
layers in the optimization process, though it will maintain any pre-existing layers generated by the
user. For this reason, the investigators consider that the attributes of the layers in the White House
document were fabricated before the file was optimized in Macintosh Preview. The presence of
layers and their object-code attributes implies that Adobe Photoshop and Adobe Illustrator were
significant contributors to and evidence of the fabrication of the electronic image, which was not
derived from a photocopy. However, for the sake of caution, I have taken no account of this
irregularity.
14) I am told that no genuine electronic document image scanned, photocopied or photographed
from a paper birth certificate in a bound volume without further processing by way of opticalcharacter recognition, file-compression or optimization would be at all likely to contain more than
one layer. Electronic images of scanned, photocopied or photographed documents typically consist
of a single data layer. Yet the White House document contains not only a single layer of 8-bit
quality but also eight separate layers each of 1-bit quality, not one of them black.
15) The meaning of 1-bit quality is that each dot of colored light that comprises the photographic
image (a picture element, or pixel), is represented in the electronic data file by a single binary
digit (or bit). A bit may have the integer value 0 or 1, and is represented in any electronic circuit
by a switch where 0 represents off and 1 represents on. The meaning of 8-bit quality is that
each pixel is represented by a group of eight bits (called a byte), representing values from
00000000, for zero, to 11111111, for 255. Thus each pixel is digitally represented by an integer
giving a different color value from 0 to 255. Each eight-bit byte in a color layer represents a
distinct hue. Clusters of pixels of various hues allow millions of distinct colors to be displayed on a
color TV monitor.
16) I am told that no optimization software generates any non-black layers of 1-bit quality, yet all of
the 1-bit-quality layers in the White House document are non-black. No such software generates
more than one layer of 1-bit quality, yet the White House document has eight such layers. No such
software generates no black layer of 1-bit quality, yet none of the eight 1-bit-quality layers in the
White House layer is black. No such software generates only one color layer, yet the White House
document has a single color layer. No such software generates fewer than 50-150 layers for an
image as complex as the White House document, yet that document possesses only nine layers.
17) Multiple layers of 1-bit quality each representing a distinct color other than black can only be
created by an operator deliberately. If the document had acquired multiple layers as a result of
optimization, it would possess only one 1-bit layer, representing all pixels that scan as black. This
layer is akin to the edges of the pieces of a jigsaw puzzle. All of the non-black layers in standard
optimization software would normally be of 8-bit quality. Each 8-bit color layer represents a single
colored region entirely bounded by black pixels. Each layer, therefore, is not really a layer at all:
instead, it represents the colored picture on a single puzzle piece bounded by black edges. In
effect, the puzzle pieces form a jigsaw puzzle. When assembled, they comprise the entire
image.
18) Any document that possesses multiple layers after automated optimization will possess only
one layer of 1-bit quality with a black color value. All other layers will be of 8-bit quality to represent
the non-black colors within the image at various locations within the document. No such document
would possess merely the single 8-bit color layer that is present in the website copy of the birth
certificate. In the data file for the White House document, the single 8-bit color layer represents the
entire greenish basket-weave pattern of the readily obtainable security paper on which the black
data were superimposed.
19) Yet a genuinely created document that possessed layers as a result of a legitimate, automated
optimization process would not have the background isolated on one 8-bit color layer: instead, the
electronic representation of the basket-weave pattern in an image as complex as a long-form birth
certificate would normally be distributed among as many as 50-200 separate jigsaw-piece layers
each bounded by a black region of the image. The investigators have told me they regard the
existence of the single 8-bit color layer representing the entire basket-weave substrate as
compelling evidence that the data structure of the document indicates that it was fabricated layer
by layer, and that it was not generated by any optimization program.
20) Where an event is certain not to occur, its probability is 0. Where it is unlikely to occur, its
probability is less than 1 in 2. Where it is likely to occur, its probability exceeds 1 in 2. Where it is
certain to occur, its probability is 1. Standing the gravity of the discrepancies between the
distribution of layers in the image on the White House website and in an image created after
processing by a normal optimization program, it would be legitimate to assign small probabilities
(somewhat close to 0) at least to each of the following discrepancies: Multiple distinct layers of 1-bit
quality, 1 in 10; none of the layers of 1-bit quality represents black, 1 in 10; a single color layer of 8bit quality represents the entire basket-weave paper, 1 in 10. If each of these evident abnormalities
in the distribution of data among the layers were independent of the others, then the combined
probability that they occurred in the same document by inadvertence is 1 in 103 i.e., odds of
1,000 to 1 against.
21) It is arguably more appropriate to regard these three probabilities as connected. It is possible
that an untypical optimization program not known to the investigators was used. However, the
investigators reviewed some 600 distinct optimization programs for the Windows operating system
and the same 600 programs for the Macintosh operating system, and did not find a single program
that created a layering structure in any way consistent with that which the White House document
exhibits. Since it is difficult to demonstrate that no optimization program consistent with the
observed layering structure exists, I have arbitrarily assumed that ten such programs exist, so that
the probability that one of these programs was used is approximately 1 in 60.
22) The date when the copy was certified by the registrar, and the registrars stamp adjacent to it,
each appear independently on separate layers of the White House document that contain no other
data of any kind. No scan of an original document could possibly produce such separation of
discrete items into distinct layers containing no other data. The forensic experts tell me they regard
this as definitive evidence that contrary to the chain-of-custody account from official sources
the document was not photocopied but fabricated piecemeal.
23) It would have been simple to place a genuine photocopy from Hawaii into a scanner, capture
the electronic image, and then print from it the copies to be distributed to reporters at the White
House press conference of April 27, 2011, uploading the innocent-seeming electronic image from
the photocopied document and concealing entirely the rare if not impossible layering
irregularities considered here. The presence of these irregularities establishes that the simpler
route was not followed, as it would have been if the original document had been genuine, and that
instead the image was pieced together electronically from several sources.
24) The two irregularly layered stamps, if inadvertent, would not only be genuinely independent of
one another but so rare as to be for all practical purposes impossible. Nevertheless, for caution I
accord them a probability of 1 in 100 each, or 1 in 10,000 together. These irregularities, taken with
the independent 1 in 60 probability of the layering irregularity, yield from the analysis of electronic
irregularities alone a probability of only 1 in 600,000 that the White House document is genuine.
25) There are further irregularities in the presentation of the apparently mechanically typed entries
on the long-form birth certificate. Manual typewriters were in use in 1961. All mechanical
typewriters then in use have fixed spacing: all letters, capital or lower-case, occupy the same width.
A common width was the Elite escapement (typically 6 points wide, i.e. 12 characters to the inch
horizontally; and 12 or 24 points line spacing, i.e. 6 single-spaced or 3 double-spaced lines to the
inch vertically). Yet the White House document is irregularly aligned both horizontally and vertically.
To demonstrate how the alignments should have appeared on a genuine form, I invited forensic
specialists to use a mechanical typewriter to enter data into a blank specimen form. The resultant
image, overlaid with a red grid to show the regularity of line-spacing and letter-spacing compared
with the irregularities in the White House document, is marked M of B 1, annexed and signed as
relative hereto.
6) The experiment demonstrates how orderly the alignment of the typewritten margins, letters,
words and lines of text would have been if the original birth certificate had been created, like others
in the public domain, by inserting a pre-printed form into a manual typewriter, aligning the carriage
at the appropriate starting point at top left, and then completing the form line by line. By contrast,
the White House document shows how unnaturally irregular the letter, word and line spacings and
alignments are.
27) In the White House document, the line spacing of the typewritten entries varies by 1 to 3 points
(1/72 to 1/24 in.) above or below the usual 24-point (1/3 in.) double-spacing. That variability would
not occur if the original document had been mechanically typewritten rather than electronically
fabricated. The Hawaiian long-form certificate, like most forms of its day that were intended for
typewriters, was designed precisely to allow double-spaced entries, so that once the first line
entered was correctly registered all other lines of type would automatically fall in the right place
within the successive form-lines as the carriage-return lever advanced the paper past the ribbon.
28) The rollers in a manual typewriter hold the paper firmly enough against the platen to avoid
slippage. The numerous visible irregularities in the line spacing of Mr Obamas copy birth certificate
are very considerably beyond what would be expected, suggesting that the typed data in the form
were placed by hand, or eyeballed.
29) The leftward foot of the letter M in Male is, as it should be, below the rightward foot,
because, as the form-lines above and below it show, the page-image curves downward near the
binding. By contrast, the word Kapiolani, unlike the word Male above it, does not curve
downward to the left as it should have done if the image had been scanned from a bound volume,
following the curvature of the form-lines above and below it.
30) The word BARACK is not aligned either to the curvature of the printed form-lines or at its
right-hand end to the words HUSSEIN and OBAMA later in the line. Also, the year 1961 is
below the adjacent month and day.
31) Variations not only line spacing but also in letter spacing are evident throughout the typewritten
form entries. One consequence is that the three flush left lines on the document are not vertically
aligned with one another, as all flush-left entries on the forensic experts document are. For
instance, the whole word Male is offset by almost half a character to the left compared with the
word Kapiolani two form-lines below it, indicating that one or the other word (or both) may have
been imported electronically from another form and inserted. In a genuine document, all the
typewritten letters and words on the form should normally have had the same vertical alignment.
32) The comma after the figure 4 is offset too much to the right, indicating that it may not have
been typed but may instead have been pasted in electronically during the composition of the
image.
33) Many of the words toward the right-hand side of the form are aligned horizontally almost half a
character farther to the right than the words on the left-hand side. This irregularity definitively
demonstrates that the document was not typed line by line from left to right. It is unlikely that a
clerk entering data into the form would have filled in the data on the left-hand side first and would
then have removed and reinserted the form in such a way as to cause so substantial a
misalignment when the right-hand half of the form was completed.
34) The typist would normally have inserted the form into the typewriter, aligned it, closed the
rollers over the platen to hold the form firmly in alignment and then typed the lines successively
from left to right. If so, the systemic rightward shift that is evident in the letters and words appearing
toward the right-hand side throughout the form could not have occurred. However, it is possible
that this discrepancy may be a consequence of parallax in the microfilm camera that was used to
take different portions of the fabricated long-form birth certificate from other documents.
35) The variable letter spacing suggests that many of the typewritten letters were placed by hand,
and not typed on a typewriter. For instance, the lower-case a appears several times on the form
more closely to the right than normal, but the capital A does not. On a mechanical typewriter, the
capital letter is carried on the same arm as the lower-case letter, so that if the document had
genuinely been typewritten either the As and as would have been correctly spaced or they
would all have been biased either leftward or rightward.
36) Word spacing is also variable in a fashion inconsistent with typewriting. Whole words are
misaligned by 1 to 3 points (1/72 to 1/24 in., or one-sixth to one-half of a character), suggesting the
words were individually pasted in as the document was fabricated piecemeal. Yet, for caution, I
have taken no account of word-spacing irregularities.
37) Though it would have been legitimate to assign individual probabilities to each of the typewriter
irregularities to which I have referred, for they would have been independent of one another if they
were inadvertent, I have cautiously assigned a single probability of 1 in 10 to all of the irregular line
spacings taken together as one irregularity, and a separate single probability of 1 in 20 to the
irregular letter spacings, likewise taken together as one irregularity. Distinct probabilities for vertical
and horizontal irregularities are appropriate because a typist creating a genuine document would
have had to take two different actions to create both irregularities. Thus, based on the
misalignments in the typing alone, the probability that the White House document is genuine is 1 in
200.
38) In addition to the irregularities in the electronic layering and in the vertical and horizontal
spacings in the typewritten entries on the form, other unexpected features suggesting forgery are
evident. Individual probabilities will be assigned to the most serious of these further irregularities.
39) A halo of white space is evident around the black portions of the White House document. The
use of Unsharp Mask a feature in the Adobe Photoshop software suite that also appears to a
more limited extent in Adobe Illustrator, and whose purpose is to clean and sharpen the image is
one of many possible causes of the problematic halo effect. However, none of these causes apply
where an original document is copied on to a photocopier, nor where that photocopy is in turn
photocopied.
40) The governor of Hawaii has said the original document was copied and given to Mr. Obamas
attorneys. The White House Press Office has said the copy birth certificates it circulated on April
27, 2011, were taken from the copies received from Hawaii the previous afternoon. At neither end
was anything done that could have caused a white halo around the typewritten entries on the form.
The existence of the white halo effect, illustrated in an image marked M of B 2, annexed and
signed as relative hereto, accordingly appears contrary to the course of events described by the
governor and the White House Press Office, which do not mention any processing or alteration of
the image that could have caused it. I assign a probability of 1 in 10 to an inadvertent occurrence
of the white halo.
41) The website copy of the birth certificate exhibits no chromatic aberration the refraction of light
when the lens of a scanner or camera comes across color contrasts (such as text against
background). I am told this aberration arises from established physics, displaying as a blue tint to
the top and left edges of a black text character, and a reddish tint to the right and bottom edges. It
can be seen in a genuine document by zooming into a text area, but it is absent in the White
House document, though it is present in the printed copies given to members of the White House
press corps, indicating that the fabricated electronic file was printed out and then photocopied,
creating the expected chromatic aberration. It is illustrated in the image marked M of B 3 annexed
and signed as relative hereto. Thus, the statements by the governor of Hawaii and the White
House Press Office cannot be correct. Since I am told the absence of chromatic aberration is
definitive evidence that that version could not have been photocopied, scanned or photographed
from a paper original, a realistic probability of inadvertent occurrence would be zero. Yet I have
cautiously assigned a probability of 1 in 100 to the actually impossible inadvertent absence of
chromatic aberration in the White House document.
42) A further irregularity is that no photocopied, scanned or photographed document would have
incorporated a clipping mask that had the effect of truncating the display of certain data forming
part of the document image. Yet the White House document has a clipping mask path that
conceals the safety paper pattern within the margins. The investigators have told me this can only
occur by deliberate manipulation and cannot result from any legitimate processing. Automated
processing such as optimization can produce a clipping mask, but a genuine mask will only define
the size of the layers and will never prevent display of data or parts of the image. The security
paper in the White House document contains a white margin that conceals not only part of the
pattern of the security paper but also some data coding numbers in pencil that are relevant to
determining whether that document is forged. A genuine electronic image of the pattern on security
paper would bleed to the edge of the document. However, I have taken no account of this
irregularity, for those creating a genuine file may have wished to trim the security paper to minimize
the data file size.
43) Mr. Obamas short-form birth certificate, when first published in 2008, had its certificate number
blacked out. It is not easy to discern any legitimate reason why this should have been done.
Indeed, a certificate number appears openly on Mr. Obamas long-form birth certificate. However,
the number is out of sequence, and it is possible that the original blacking-out of the number on the
short-form certificate was an attempt to conceal this irregularity. The certificate appears to be
stamped as having been registered on Tuesday, August 8, 1961, on which date the number 10641
was assigned to it. However, the Vital Statistics for 1961 issued by the U.S. Department of Health
& Human Services show that 17,578 births occurred that year in Hawaii: an average of 48 births
per day. Therefore, Mr. Obamas certificate should have been about 3 x 48 = 144 numbers less
than the numbers issued to two girls, the Nordyke twins, whose certificates were registered three
days later, on Friday, Aug. 11, as 10637 and 10638. It should certainly not have had a number
greater than theirs. An automated sequential numbering stamp was used, and batches of birth
certificates were collected monthly, ordered by date and time of birth and then sequentially
number-stamped in a special room by a single clerk trained for the purpose, precisely to minimize
numbering errors. However, for caution, I have assumed that 1 number in 25 might inadvertently
be out of sequence.
44) The birth date of Mr. Obamas alleged father is two years out. It not impossible that the childs
mother did not know his fathers date of birth, or that the date was incorrectly entered. I have
assigned a 1 in 40 probability to this event.
45) The alleged fathers race is described as African some 28 years before the term African or
African-American first came into general usage. In 1961, written rules forbade the use of such
generalized racial descriptors. The term African was specifically barred. Ms. Verna K. Lee, the
registrar an image of whose signature appears on the White House document, drew the
investigators attention to the list of codings that were used for statistical returns to the Federal
Government: 1 White; 2 Negro; 3 Indian (includes Aleuts and Eskimos); 4 Chinese; 5 Japanese; 6
Hawaiian (includes part-Hawaiian); 7 Other Nonwhite; Unknown or not stated (Race of parents
only). The word African is not listed. I have assigned a 1 in 25 probability to the occurrence of the
explicitly prohibited and then-uncommon use of the word African to describe the alleged fathers
race.
46) Coding numbers added to the form in pencil adjacent to various of the typed data entries on
the form are incompatible with the data that had been entered. Box 9 on the form, Race of
Father, has African typed in it. Yet the coding is 9, which stands for Unknown or not stated.
Likewise, Box 12b, Kind of Business or Industry, has University typed in it, but is also assigned
the empty-box code 9. Since these two events may have been connected even if they were
inadvertent, and bearing in mind Ms. Lees statement to investigators to the effect that mistakes
were not made on her watch, I have assigned a single 1 in 25 probability to these events taken as
one.
47) There are many further irregularities in the White House document, but I have not assigned
probabilities to them. Had I done so, the probability that the document is genuine would have been
still smaller than it is. Those irregularities to which I have assigned probabilities are as follows:
Independent event and probability
Multiple layers of 1-bit quality, no 1-bit-quality layer represents black and one 8-bit-quality color
layer: 1 in 60 (combined)
Registrars signature-stamp on its own layer: 1 in 100 (actually impossible)
Registrars date-stamp on its own layer: 1 in 100 (actually impossible)
Line spacing irregularities: 1 in 10
Letter spacing irregularities: 1 in 20
White halo effect around black text: 1 in 10
Chromatic aberration absent: 1 in 100 (actually impossible)
Certificate number out of sequence: 1 in 25
Fathers birth date two years out: 1 in 40
Use of African against written rules: 1 in 25
Miscoding of federal statistical data: 1 in 25
Probability that all errors were inadvertent: 1 in 75 quadrillion
48) As the above shows, the probability that the White House document is genuine (in that each of
the irregularities identified by the investigators occurred by inadvertence), is the product of the
individual probabilities that the mutually independent irregularities were accidental. That probability
is 1 in 75,000,000,000,000,000.
50) Likewise, even where there are as few as two defects in a forged document, each with a low
probability of innocent occurrence, the probability that the document is genuine must be small. For
instance, given that the isolation not only of the electronic data representing the registrars
signature stamp but also of the data representing his date-stamp on distinct data layers are
occurrences that forensic specialists in the examination of electronic documents consider could not
have occurred naturally, if the probability of each irregularity is taken as small (say, 1 in 100 for
each of the two irregularities, though the probabilities are likely to be much less than this), the
probability that both defects occurred by inadvertence and that thus the document is genuine is 1
in 10,000.
51) If as here there are multiple irregularities in a document, most of which possess low
probabilities of innocent occurrence, the probability that the document is genuine must be
vanishingly small In my experience, I have never found a situation which, when this probabilistic
technique is applied, is determined to be so very nearly certain to be a deception as the White
House document.
52) One might also legitimately assign probabilities no greater than 1 in 100 to each of three
irregularities in other identification documents pertaining to Mr. Obama. First, there are numerous
irregularities in the short-form abstract of his birth record published in the run-up to his 2008
candidacy, including an inconsistency between the text of the abstract and the form of words in use
at the time when it was, on its face, issued. Secondly, the Selective Service record signed by him
carries a two-digit year stamp contrary to written rules issued by the Department of Defense
specifying a four-digit stamp, which, as far as the investigators could discover, was invariably used
on all other Selective Service registration records at that time. Thirdly, his Social Security number
carries a three-digit Connecticut prefix even though he had never lived there and all adjacent
Social Security numbers with the same three-digit prefix that the investigators could trace were
issued to residents of Connecticut. Taking these three additional irregularities together with the 13
irregularities in the White House document, the probability that Mr. Obamas identity
documentation is true falls from 1 in 75 quadrillion to 1 in 75 sextillion.
53) Even if each of the 16 irregularities were assigned a probability no less than 1 in 2, implying
that each irregularity is at least as likely as not to occur in a genuine document, the probability that
the documentation is genuine would be 1 in 216, or less than 1 in 65,000. Further, in this analysis I
have cautiously left out of account several irregularities such as the indication that Mr. Obamas
Social Security number fails the official online e-verify check each of which ought to be
assigned probabilities no greater than 1 in 2, reducing the probability of genuineness still further.
Whichever way the analysis is done, that probability cannot be other than vanishingly small.
54) In this analysis, I have relied upon the published results of the Cold Case Posses
investigation. To the extent that the investigators results are reliable and robust, and to the extent
that the probabilities I have assigned to each individual irregularity that the investigators have
identified are considered reasonable, my conclusion that the probability that the White House
document is genuine is vanishingly different from zero necessarily follows. Even if the probabilities
I have chosen were to be considered excessively low, the fact that there are so many independent
irregularities, even if absurdly high probabilities of occurrence such as 1 in 2 were assigned to
each irregularity, would be sufficient to demonstrate beyond reasonable doubt that the White
House document is a forgery.
Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2015/03/affadvit-white-house-birth-certificate-is-aforgery/#fHXBOXkLRGV7igj1.99

-----------------------------------------------------------------------x
Index No.: 21948 / 2012


Petitioner,

Respondents.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------x

Exhibit 7
Strunk v Board of Elections City of N.Y. :: April, 2013 :: New York Othe...
1 of 3
Justia.com
Lawyer Directory
Legal Answers
Law
http://law.justia.com/cases/new-york/other-courts/2013/2013-ny-slip-op-...
more
in
Justia > US Law > US Case Law > New York Case Law > New York Other Courts Decisions > April, 2013 > Strunk v Board of Electi
NEW - Receive Justia's FREE Daily Newsletters of Opinion Summaries for the US Supreme Court, all US F
Courts & the 50 US State Supreme Courts and Weekly Practice Area Opinion Summaries Newsletters. Subscrib
Strunk v Board of Elections City of N.Y.

Share |
Justia on
Tweet
Like
[*1] Strunk v Board of Elections City of N.Y. 2013 NY Slip Op 50517(U) Decided on April
3, 2013 Supreme Court, Kings County Schmidt, J. Published by New York State Law
Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law 431. This opinion is uncorrected and will
not be published in the printed Official Reports.
Decided on April 3, 2013
Supreme Court, Kings County
Christopher-Earl Strunk, Petitioner,
Like
130,234 peopl
your friends lik
Daily Opinion
Subscribe to Ju
Newsletter Op
Subscr
against
Board of Elections City of New York, Hakeem Jeffries, Felix Ortiz, Keith L.T. Wright,
Mario Cilento et al., Respondents.
21948/12
Plaintiff - Self-Represented , Christopher Strunk, 593 Vanderbilt Avenue, #281,
Today on Ver
Rape by Deceptio
Impersonation, a
California Bill
Justia columnist an
law professor Sher
discusses two type
that may not at firs
mind when one thi
that are very traum
rape by impersona
deception.
By Sherry F. Colb
Brooklyn, NY 11238
Defendant Attorney: Colleran, O'Hara & Mills, LLP, 1225 franklin Avenue, Suite 450,
Ask a Lawyer
Garden City, NY 11530.
Question:
David I. Schmidt, J.
5/1/2013 3:29 PM
2 of 3
Upon the foregoing papers in this Article 78 proceeding, respondents Felix Ortiz and
Keith L.T. Wright moves to dismiss the petition against them. In a separate motion,
About Leg
respondent Mario Cilento moves to dismiss the petition against him.

On November 14, 2012, petitioner Christopher-Earl Stunk commenced this proceeding
Connect with
by filing a petition with the County Clerk. Among other things, the petition sought an
Follow @Ju
injunction staying the December 15, 2012 vote of the New York Electoral College as well
as a judgment declaring that Presidential Electors who comprise the Electoral College
RT @TechCrunch:
Alleged Skype Pate
Cases Against ... http://t.co/g
are precluded by their fiduciary and legal duties from voting for President Obama. In
this regard, it is petitioner's contention that President Obama is not qualified to serve as
Justia
President of the United States inasmuch as he is not a natural-born citizen of the United
Like
States as [*2]required under relevant provisions of the United States Constitution.[FN1]
130,234 people like Justia.
Respondents Ortiz, Wright, and Cilento, all of whom are Presidential Electors and
members of New York State's Electoral College, now move to dismiss the petition as
against them. In support of his motion, Cilento argues that: petitioner lacks standing;
the petition fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted; the petitioner's
Facebook social plugin
claims are barred by collateral estoppel, and that petitioner failed to properly serve the
petition. Respondent Celento further argues that petitioner should be sanctioned under
Find a Lawye
22 NYCRR 130-1.1(a) for engaging in frivolous conduct. In support of their subject,

respondents Wright and Ortiz raise these same arguments. In addition, Wright and Ortiz
argue that the petition must be dismissed as moot inasmuch as the Electoral College
vote has already taken place.
In opposition to the motion, petitioner contends that the subject respondents are "de
Lawyers - Ge
facto state officers," and as such, were properly served pursuant to CPLR 307.
Get a free full dir
Petitioner also argues that collateral estoppel does not bar his claims inasmuch there
has never been a trial of facts regarding his underlying claim - namely the President
Obama's Hawaiian birth certificate is a forgery. Petitioner further contends that he does
have standing in this matter in his capacity as a private citizen under the 14th
Amendment. In addition, petitioner argues that his claims are justiciable inasmuch as
the members of the New York State Electoral College are subject to the jurisdiction of
state court. Finally, petitioner argues that his claims are not moot inasmuch as the
likelihood of repetition and a continued injury requires a decision by the court.
Initially, it is clear that respondent failed to properly serve the moving respondents with
the petition. In particular, it is undisputed that petitioner merely mailed a copy of the
notice of petition and petition to the movants, which does not satisfy the requirements
for service upon an individual set forth in CPLR 308 (Matter of Charters III v Vegiante, 2
AD3d 730, 731 [2003]). Moreover, even if the court were to deem the moving
respondents to be state officers, petitioner failed to properly serve said respondents in
accordance with CPLR 307. Consequently, the petition must be dismissed as against the
moving respondents based upon lack of personal jurisdiction.
Further, even if petitioner had properly served the petition, the matter would have to be
dismissed based upon additional fatal defects. Specifically, petitioner lack standing. In
5/1/2013 3:29 PM
3 of 3
this regard, in an Article 78 proceeding, "a private citizen who does not show any
special rights or interests in the matter in controversy, other than those common to all
tax-payers and citizens, has no standing to sue" (Matter of Meehan v County of
Westchester, 3 AD3d 533, 534 [2004]). Here, petitioner has not demonstrated any such
special rights or interest other than those common to all citizens. In addition, the
petition fails to state any cognizable claim against the moving respondents under either
New York State Election Law, Federal Law, or the common-law. Moreover, inasmuch as
the New York State Electoral College has already voted, petitioner's claims against the
moving respondents are moot (Saratoga County Chamber of Commerce, Inc. v Pataki,
100 NY2d 801, 810 [2003]). [*3]
As a final matter, under the circumstances presented, the court declines to impose
sanctions against petitioner.
Accordingly, the respondents' motions are granted to the extent that the petition is
dismissed as against respondents Ortiz, Wright, and Cilento.
This constitutes the decision and order of the court.
E N T E R,
J. S. C. Footnotes
Footnote 1: The petition also seeks to void the election of New York Senator Kirsten
Gillibrand.
Copyright Justia :: Company :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Contact Us
5/1/2013 3:29 PM

-----------------------------------------------------------------------x
Index No.: 21948 / 2012


Petitioner,

Respondents.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------x

Exhibit 8
3/2/2015
USPS FAQ
Review Email
Please review the request before submitting.
Your request details:
Request Type
[edit]
InquiryType Problem
Category Business
Topic Other Business Services > Other
Additional Detail:
Additional
CHRISTOPHER EARL STRUNK OF 593 VANDERBILT AVENUE PMB 281
Information:BROOKLYN NEW YORK 11238 PH 718-414-3760
NEEDS RE: CASE #121904202 OF THE USPS A TRACKING REPORT FOR EACH OF THE
FOLLOWING CERTIFIED MAIL PACKAGES SENT DURING 2012:
Certified Mail on November 9, 2012:

70101870000042924382
70121010000068748706
70101870000042924498
70101870000042924443
70101870000042924467
70101870000042924399
70121010000068748690
70101870000042924436
70101870000042924412
70101870000042924481
70101870000042924450
70101870000042924474
70101870000042924429
70101870000042924405
Certified Mail on November 14, 2012:
70121010000068749741
70121010000068749818
70121010000068749758
70121010000068749765
70121010000068749956
70121010000068749826
70121010000068749833
70121010000068749840
70121010000068749857
https://prd2faq.usps.com/faq/iq/usps/request.do?create=kb:USPSFAQ&forward=inquiryType#
1/2
3/2/2015
USPS FAQ
70121010000068749864
70121010000068749901
70121010000068750242
70121010000068749963
70121010000068749796
70121010000068749949
70121010000068749895
70121010000068749970
70121010000068749802
70121010000068749772
70121010000068749789
70121010000068749871
70121010000068749888
70121010000068749918
70121010000068749925
70121010000068749932
70121010000068749987
Contact Information:
[edit]
First
CHRISTOPHER
Name
Middle
E
Initial
Last
STRUNK
Name
Company
Name
Address 1 593 VANDERBILT AVENUE
Address 2 PMB 281
City BROOKLYN
State NY
Urbanization
ZIP
11238
Code
Phone 718-414-3760
Email suretynomore@gmail.com
Preferred
email
response
method
https://prd2faq.usps.com/faq/iq/usps/request.do?create=kb:USPSFAQ&forward=inquiryType#
2/2

-----------------------------------------------------------------------x
Index No.: 21948 / 2012


Petitioner,

Respondents.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------x

Exhibit 9
Four Judge Panel of NYS Appellate Court admits it is unable to provide for civilian due process of law
when under statutory national emergency of 12 USC 95 and 50 USC App. 5(b) proclamation 2040 of FDR and
continuing under POTUS Commander-in-chief BHO Executive ALL defacto Federal and State Courts.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------x
Index No.: 21948 / 2012


Petitioner,
PETITIONERS MOL FOR

NOTICE OF MOTION
FOR CPLR 3215(a)(b)
DEFAULT JUDGMENT

Respondents.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------x
This is Petitioners Memorandum of Law in support of his Motion with CPLR 3215(a)(b) for a
Default Judgment as to each State Officers failure to appear after service of the Petition and Note of
Issue with Notice of readiness for review at trial of the facts as to use of false instruments and ineligibility
of Barack Hussein Obama II to serve as President of the United States that requires an inquest and
criminal referral of findings;
There was an interlocutory decision by this court as yet to be entered (see Exhibit 7).
There is an ongoing saga of unresolved events by my request of the US Postal Service request for
a tracking log of the certified mail service back in the 2012 archives (see Exhibit 8).
That on 4 March 2014 the New York State Supreme Court Appellate Division for the Second
Department Judicial panel sitting in review of pre-1933 Private National Citizen of the United States
Appellants Amicus motion in Appeal Cases 2012-05515, 2013-06335 and 2014-00297 from orders in the
trial court for Index No: 6500-2011, to my demand that it provide for civilian due process of law rather
than the continued martial due process of law under statutory direct authority of the POTUS Commanderin-chief over the de facto Federal and NYS Unified Court System courts under statutory authority of 12
USC 95 and 50 USC App. 5(b) ORDERED to deny for civilian due process of law (see Exhibit 9).
As a point of law the 9 November 2012 Certified Mail Service upon the respective DA makes the
DA a party to the Article 78 matter too under the unusual circumstance of State officers also serving as
Electors as if Private U.S. Citizens under the state of war recognized by the Appellate Division panel,
when each is surety-indenture for the Public U.S. Citizen in commerce, not a pre-1933 Private National
Citizen, when warned of criminal involvement then ties private discretion to Public Officer duties too.
The unique nature of this Article 78 matter bridges the period from October 2008 through
November 9, 2012 and involves a criminal complaint duly filed with the respective District Attorney for
the Domicile County of the respective elector appointed at the November 6, 2012 General Election; and
Further as to the unique nature of this Article 78 matter is that Elections in New York are not run
by the Secretary of State as in other state of the several states, but by Private Political Parties, the
Democratic and Republican Parties, that by operation of law are quasi State Parties chosen at the
Gubernatorial election every four years, and as such both statutory entities are by their very nature in
conjunction with the National Party organizations by operation of law are charged with the determination
of who is or is not eligible to be a candidate under El Article 12 by the choice of the New York State
Legislature; and
Further, unlike any other state legislature, the New York legislature allows its own members as
state officers along with other state public officers either elected appointed or licensed subject to NYS
Public Officer Law to also serve as electors accordingly, as of right, under the Federal Constitution
Article 2 and 12th Amendment appointment of POTUS electors, accordingly burdens each State Officer;
However, as a function of the New York State Legislature choice with use of NYS Election Law
Article 12 it may not also suspend the obligation of State and Public officers oath to uphold the State and
Federal Constitutions and or obey the law of the land under martial due process of law; and therefore,
when state officers are formed as a body to serve the legislative purpose and each is designated to serve
from the respective members domicile rather than at the respective government office, that domicile is
for the body the official address for place of service for the respective State Officers under CPLR 307 (1)
That the Certified Mail service of the Affidavit Criminal Complaint upon the respective District
Attorney of the County of the Electors domicile with due notice given to each Elector of the intent to file
a Petition for the Elector to seek review of the actual evidence of the falsified instruments requiring of the
NYS CPLR 307. Personal service upon the state. 2. Personal service on a state officer sued solely in an
official capacity or state agency, which shall be required to obtain personal jurisdiction over such an officer or
agency, shall be made (2) by mailing the summons by certified mail, return receipt requested, to such officer or
to the chief executive officer of such agency, and by personal service upon the state in the manner provided by
subdivision one of this section. Service by certified mail shall not be complete until the summons is received in a
principal office of the agency and until personal service upon the state in the manner provided by subdivision one
of this section is completed. For purposes of this subdivision, the term "principal office of the agency" shall
mean the location at which the office of the chief executive officer of the agency is generally located. Service
by certified mail shall not be effective unless the front of the envelope bears the legend "URGENT LEGAL MAIL"
in capital letters. The chief executive officer of every such agency shall designate at least one person, in addition to
himself or herself, to accept personal service on behalf of the agency. For purposes of this subdivision the term
state agency shall be deemed to refer to any agency, board, bureau, commission, division, tribunal or other entity
which constitutes the state for purposes of service under subdivision one of this section.
Strunk v. Jeffries et al Index No.: 21948-2012

STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF KINGS
)
) ss.
)
Accordingly, I, FRANCISCO POHOLE, being duly sworn, depose and say under penalty of perjury:
a. Am over 18 years of age and not a party to this action.
b. My place of business is located at 753 39TH Street Brooklyn New York .
c. On March 13, 2015, Christopher Strunk instructed me to serve a true conformed copy of
PETITIONERS MOTION FOR CPLR 3215 (a)(b) DEFAULT JUDGMENT and AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT
affirmed March 11, 2015 with Exhibits and Memorandum of Law Annexed in the Petition Index
no: 21948-2012, by regular mail and/or with Certified Mail as designated below for delivery by
the USPS upon respondents and those listed below.
d. On March 13, 2015, I caused each copy with proper postage for service by the USPS with each
envelope marked URGENT LEGAL MAIL or PERSONAL & CONFIDENTIAL deposited with
USPS for service upon:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.

Kirsten Gillibrand with DC Office 478 Russell Washington, DC 20510
3/15/2015
English
USPS.com - USPS Tracking

Customer Serv ice
USPS Mobile
Register / Sign In
Customer Service
USPS Tracking
Have questions? We're here to help.
Tracking Number: 70142120000309141151
Expected Delivery Day: Monday, March 16, 2015
Product & Tracking Information

Postal Product:
Extra Svc:
First-Class Mail
Certified Mail
Available Actions
Return Receipt
DATE & TIME
STATUS OF ITEM
LOCATION
March 14, 2015 , 11:53 pm
Departed USPS Facility
NEW YORK, NY 10199
Text Updates
Email Updates
Your item departed our USPS facility in NEW YORK, NY 10199 on March 14, 2015 at 11:53 pm. The
item is currently in transit to the destination.
March 14, 2015 , 9:51 pm
Arrived at USPS Origin

Facility
NEW YORK, NY 10199
March 13, 2015 , 8:31 pm
Departed Post Office
BROOKLYN, NY 11201
March 13, 2015 , 7:23 pm
Acceptance
BROOKLYN, NY 11201
Track Another Package

Tracking (or receipt) number
Track It
Copyright 2015 USPS. All Rights Reserved.
https://tools.usps.com/go/TrackConfirmAction?qtc_tLabels1=70142120000309141151
1/2

Default Motion by CES in Re Strunk V Jeffries Et Al. NYCPLR Article 78 - Petition 21948-12 W MOL W Exhibits

Hochgeladen von

Dokumentinformationen

Originaltitel

Copyright

Verfügbare Formate

Dieses Dokument teilen

Dokument teilen oder einbetten

Freigabeoptionen

Stufen Sie dieses Dokument als nützlich ein?

Sind diese Inhalte unangemessen?

Copyright:

Verfügbare Formate

Default Motion by CES in Re Strunk V Jeffries Et Al. NYCPLR Article 78 - Petition 21948-12 W MOL W Exhibits

Hochgeladen von

Copyright:

Verfügbare Formate

Hakeem Jeffries 35 Underhill Avenue, #2A -- Brooklyn, NY 11238

Grace Meng of 14714 34th Avenue -- Flushing, NY 11354

Janet DiFiore District Attorney Office of Westchester District Attorney

Index No.: 21948 / 2012

Christopher-Earl : Strunk in esse Sui juris

Joseph Morelle; Scott Adams; Stephanie Miner; Steve Bellone;

FOR FAILURE TO REVIEW THE

Irene Stein; Sheila Comar; and Kirsten Gillibrand

FACTS AT TRIAL NOW NEEDS

Petitioners Motion for Default Judgment as to NYS Electors et al Page 1 of 6

Petitioners Motion for Default Judgment as to NYS Electors et al Page 2 of 6

Petitioners Motion for Default Judgment as to NYS Electors et al Page 3 of 6

Petitioners Motion for Default Judgment as to NYS Electors et al Page 4 of 6

Petitioners Motion for Default Judgment as to NYS Electors et al Page 5 of 6

Petitioner's Motion for Default Judgment as to NYS Electors et a1 Page 6 of 6

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Index No.: 21948 / 2012

Christopher-Earl : Strunk in esse Sui juris

Joseph Morelle; Scott Adams; Stephanie Miner; Steve Bellone;

FOR FAILURE TO REVIEW THE

Irene Stein; Sheila Comar; and Kirsten Gillibrand

FACTS AT TRIAL NOW NEEDS

NEW YORK STATE SUPREME COURT

Hakeem Jeffries 35 Underhill Avenue, #2A -- Brooklyn, NY 11238

Bill DeBlasio of 442 11th Street -- Brooklyn, NY 11215

Gerald D. Jennings of 1135 New Scotland Road -- Albany, NY 12208

Andrew M. Cuomo 138 Eagle Street -- Albany, NY 12202

George Gresham 1313 East 233rd Street -- Bronx, NY 10466

Byron Brown 14 Blaine Street -- Buffalo, NY 14208

Ruben Diaz, Jr. of 820 Boyton Avenue, #6D -- Bronx, NY 10473

Joseph Morelle of 133 Deerfield Drive -- Rochester, NY 14609

Tom DiNapoli 100 Great Neck Road -- Great Neck, NY 11201

Stephanie Miner 102 Woodside Drive -- Syracuse, NY 13224

Steve Bellone 107 Vanderbilt Avenue -- West Babylon, NY 11704

Grace Meng of 14714 34th Avenue -- Flushing, NY 11354

Christopher-Earl: Strunk in esse

CERTIFIED RETURN RECEIPT # 70 101870000042924382

STATE OF NEW YORK

Christopher,-Earl: Strunk in esse

Sworn to before.&& #QY[ $:.$2012

Brandywine Drive -- Ithaca,

CERTIFIED RETURN RECEIPT # 701010000068748706

Christopher,-Earl: Strunk in esse

Cc: Sheila Comar 29 Depot Street -- Middle Granville, NY 12849

Christopher-Earl: Strunk in esse

CERTIFIED RETURN RECEIPT # 70 101870000042924498

CERTIFIED RETURN RECEIPT # 70101870000042924443

COUNTY 0.F KINGS

Christopher-Earl: Strunk in esse

P. David Soares District Attorney

CERTIFIED RETURN RECEIPT # 70 101870000042924467

Christopher-Earl: Strunk in esse

sworn to befws5@ I{g.yl'@

Christopher-Earl: Stmnk in esse

CERTIFIED RETURN RECEIPT # 70 10 1870000042924399

COMPLAINT OF ATTEMPT TO COMMIT A CRIME BY A PUBLIC OFFICER WITH NOTICE OF INTENT TO

CERTIFIED RETURN RECEIPT # 70 1010000068748690

STATE OF NEW YORK

Christopher-Earl: Strunk in esse

PUBLIC. sag Of my&

> -,-?<- .-..-'oua~lfbdin Kings

Cc: Ken Jenkins 108 Bushey Avenue -- Yonkers, NY 10710

CERTIFIED RETURN RECEIPT # 70101870000042924436