Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Revision 1.2
September 10th, 2007
Revision 1.0
UT Starcom Inc.
New Jersey Technical Center,
33, Wood Avenue South,
Iselin, NJ, 08830
Introduction
UTStarcoms BBS Series of Optical Line Terminals (OLT) provides a direct optical interface to
the Ethernet/IP network core. Together with UTStarcoms Optical Network Unit (ONU), it
completes the end-to-end optical last mile with up to 1 Gbps of bandwidth to residential and
business customers. Combining the economic benefits of Ethernet Passive Optical Network
(GEPON) with built-in L2/L3 switching and routing functionalities, the BBS is an optimal
transport platform for bandwidth-intensive triple play services.
2
Scope
Page 2 of 13
Revision 1.0
Audience
This documented is intended for UTStarcom GEPON customers, Sales engineering and field
support engineers.
First step is to calculate the total optical loss budget and verify that it is within the loss
budget of the UTStarcom PON being deployed.
4.1.1 UTStarcom PON budget
OLT TX Power
OLT RX Sensitivity
ONU TX Power
ONU RX Sensitivity
Range
Worst Case
+2 to +7dBm
3.5dBm
-30dBm
-30dBm
-1 to +3 dBm
-1 dBm
-25.5 dBm
-25.5 dBm
Page 3 of 13
Receiver
Saturation
-10 dBm
-3 dBm
Revision 1.0
Network Components
Item Description
Attenuation
Units
Notes
0.33
db/km
@ 1490 nm
0.21
db/km
@ 1550 nm
0.19
db/km
Insertion
Loss
2. Fiber splice
0.1
db
3. SC connector
0.4
db
4. 1x2 splitter
3.5
db
5. 1x4 splitter
7.4
db
6. 1x8 splitter
11
db
7. 1x16 splitter
14.3
db
8. 1x32
17.8
db
1.5
db
db
Page 4 of 13
Revision 1.0
Figure 1 gives a typical GEPON installation identifying the various components and the
considerations for optical power budget
OLT
EDFA / WDM
Mux
Legend:
ODF
Fiber
Optic
Cable
Fiber
Optic
Cable
1:16
Splitter
NAP
SC connector
1:4
Splitter
Fiber splice
LCP
Optical
junction
box
ONU
Telephone
Subs
premise
budget
Link
Characterization
Splitter & Splice
Characterization
Figure 1
4.2
Page 5 of 13
Revision 1.0
In this step Fiber loss and attenuation should be measured to ensure that it meets the
specifications. This should be measured from OLT to Splitter and from Splitter to ONU before
splicing. This should be done for each wavelength (1310nm, 1490nm and 1550nm) as the
loss varies with the wavelength and is higher for higher wavelength.
This measurement enables us to identify any potential problem in the fiber deployment like
macro-bends. Macro-bends will cause extra signal loss. It may be cause by several factors
including tight tie wraps or sharp bend angles.
4.3
This should be done after splicing to ensure that splitter meets the specifications.
4.4
This is done between OLT end and the ONU end, bidirectional and for all three wavelengths
(1310,1490 and 1550nm). One should ensure that the end to end loss is within the optical
power budget of UTStarcom PON equipment as indicated above. Please note that The total
loss should be less then the total optical power budget but more then the receiver
saturation threshold as identifies in Table 1. This test will verify that:
4.5
Back-reflection measurement is OK: Telcordia sets an objective of -40 dB, but this
assumes that all components are newly installed and that all of them respect the
latest Telcordia recommendations. Generally speaking though, a value in the -30 to
-35 dB range is sufficient. Values less than -30 dB should trigger corrective action.
Splice losses should be below 0.1 dB
OTL/ONU Power On
The last step is to verify the OLT power received at the ONU end ot verify that it is greater
then the receiver sensitivity and less then the saturation threshold.
Page 6 of 13
Revision 1.0
Below is a sample calculation for the GEPON network identified above. It assumed the worst
case Scenario for OLT and Transmit power.
OLTONU
ONUOLT
forward
Down
Up
1550
Input Power
1490
1310
nm
NA
NA
dbm
Transmit Power
29
3.5
-1
dbm
Receiver Sensitivity
-9
-30
-25.5
dbm
Range
38
29
29
db
db
db
1.65
db
Cable Loss
Feeder (C.O. - LCP)
Km.
0
Wavelength
1310
0.33
1490
0.21
1550
Dist. ( LCP-NAP-Drop)
Km.
5
Wavelength
0.19
Attenuation ( db/km)
1310
0.33
1490
0.21
1550
0.19
1.05
db
0.95
Connector
Pair Loss
#
C.O. (OLT-ODF)
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.4
db
LCP
0.4
db
NAP
0.4
db
0.4
0.8
0.8
0.8
db
Subs premise
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.4
db
0.1
db
0.6
0.6
db
Splice Loss
#
Loss (db)
10
Overlay+Mux
WDM MUX
0.6
0.6
Power Split
1x8
11
11
db
Splitter Loss
Location
#
1
Type
1x2
3.5
db
1x4
7.4
7.4
7.4
7.4
db
1x8
11
db
1x16
14.3
14.3
14.3
14.3
db
1x32
17.8
db
Page 7 of 13
db
1
db
37.85
26.95
27.55
db
Revision 1.0
Page 8 of 13
-34.85
-23.45
-28.55
db
0.15
2.05
1.45
db
4.6
Revision 1.0
Here is a list of best practices complied from our experience with current customer base.
1. It is recommended that customer go through the 5 step process described above as
part of the installation process. These steps would help in network planning and
identifying any potential problem up front thus reducing costly maintenance later on.
2. It is recommended that customers use splitters verified by us. In case third party
equipment it is important to verify that they fall within the optical budget.
3. It is recommended that only UTStarcom supplied GEPON SFP be used. No other SFPs
are recommended at this time.
4. Common Mistakes to avoid:
a. Failure to do proper power budget calculation. Budgeting with no or very less
margins can cause random problems that are difficult and costly to pinpoint
and fix post installation.
b. Sharp Fiber bends: Fiber bends increase losses. These losses increase with
the wavelength. Fiber should not be bent beyond its bent radius. This is
around 30mm for PON case. Thus care should be taken to prevent bends,
especially at the access points (Connectors/splitters).
c. Micro-bends: Micro bends are cause by too tight cable ties and add to optical
power loss. Simple solution like using Velcro can alleviate this problem.
5. We recommend the following instruments for this installation planning and check.
These equipments are also available for rent by major optical fiber companies like
corning (http://www.corningcablesystems.com/web/corp/engserv.nsf/ehtml/eqrent )
a. OTDR
b. Variable F/b Digital attenuator
c. Fiber cleaning kit.
d. Power Meter
4.7
Page 9 of 13
Revision 1.0
Following example shows undesirable fiber bend at the splitter and possible solution for
the same.
Page 10 of 13
Page 11 of 14
Revision 1.0
Page 12 of 13
Revision 1.0
Revision 1.0
Potential
Sharp Bend
due to entry
and exist
Splitter
2
1
1
44
2
1
1
Page 2
Input to this level
Pass Through
Pass Through
44
Pass Through
Page 13
of 13
Page 3
2
1
1